Next Article in Journal
Using Linear Mixed-Effects Models with Quantile Regression to Simulate the Crown Profile of Planted Pinus sylvestris var. Mongolica Trees
Previous Article in Journal
Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil

An Examination of Diameter Density Prediction with k-NN and Airborne Lidar

USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, University of Washington, P.O. Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA
Washington State Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 47000, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia, WA 98504-7000, USA
Faculty of Science and Forestry, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland
Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Peavy 204, OR 97331-5706, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(11), 444;
Received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 30 October 2017 / Accepted: 10 November 2017 / Published: 16 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Inventory, Modeling and Remote Sensing)
While lidar-based forest inventory methods have been widely demonstrated, performances of methods to predict tree diameters with airborne lidar (lidar) are not well understood. One cause for this is that the performance metrics typically used in studies for prediction of diameters can be difficult to interpret, and may not support comparative inferences between sampling designs and study areas. To help with this problem we propose two indices and use them to evaluate a variety of lidar and k nearest neighbor (k-NN) strategies for prediction of tree diameter distributions. The indices are based on the coefficient of determination (R2), and root mean square deviation (RMSD). Both of the indices are highly interpretable, and the RMSD-based index facilitates comparisons with alternative (non-lidar) inventory strategies, and with projects in other regions. K-NN diameter distribution prediction strategies were examined using auxiliary lidar for 190 training plots distribute across the 800 km2 Savannah River Site in South Carolina, USA. We evaluate the performance of k-NN with respect to distance metrics, number of neighbors, predictor sets, and response sets. K-NN and lidar explained 80% of variability in diameters, and Mahalanobis distance with k = 3 neighbors performed best according to a number of criteria. View Full-Text
Keywords: forest inventory; dbh; diameter distribution; performance criteria forest inventory; dbh; diameter distribution; performance criteria
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Strunk, J.L.; Gould, P.J.; Packalen, P.; Poudel, K.P.; Andersen, H.-E.; Temesgen, H. An Examination of Diameter Density Prediction with k-NN and Airborne Lidar. Forests 2017, 8, 444.

AMA Style

Strunk JL, Gould PJ, Packalen P, Poudel KP, Andersen H-E, Temesgen H. An Examination of Diameter Density Prediction with k-NN and Airborne Lidar. Forests. 2017; 8(11):444.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Strunk, Jacob L., Peter J. Gould, Petteri Packalen, Krishna P. Poudel, Hans-Erik Andersen, and Hailemariam Temesgen. 2017. "An Examination of Diameter Density Prediction with k-NN and Airborne Lidar" Forests 8, no. 11: 444.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop