Next Article in Journal
Countering Negative Effects of Terrain Slope on Airborne Laser Scanner Data Using Procrustean Transformation and Histogram Matching
Next Article in Special Issue
Mixed-Severity Fire Fosters Heterogeneous Spatial Patterns of Conifer Regeneration in a Dry Conifer Forest
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Climatic Geographical Range of Liriodendron chinense
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Linear Disturbances and Fire Severity on Velvet Leaf Blueberry Abundance, Vigor, and Berry Production in Recently Burned Jack Pine Forests
Article

Fire Effects on Historical Wildfire Refugia in Contemporary Wildfires

1
Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 1133, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
Department of Geography, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 3021, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
3
College of the Environment, Wesleyan University, 284 High Street, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
4
School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Equal contribution.
Forests 2017, 8(10), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100400
Received: 2 August 2017 / Revised: 6 October 2017 / Accepted: 10 October 2017 / Published: 20 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wildland Fire, Forest Dynamics, and Their Interactions)
Wildfire refugia are forest patches that are minimally-impacted by fire and provide critical habitats for fire-sensitive species and seed sources for post-fire forest regeneration. Wildfire refugia are relatively understudied, particularly concerning the impacts of subsequent fires on existing refugia. We opportunistically re-visited 122 sites classified in 1994 for a prior fire refugia study, which were burned by two wildfires in 2012 in the Cascade mountains of central Washington, USA. We evaluated the fire effects for historically persistent fire refugia and compared them to the surrounding non-refugial forest matrix. Of 122 total refugial (43 plots) and non-refugial (79 plots) sites sampled following the 2012 wildfires, one refugial and five non-refugial plots did not burn in 2012. Refugial sites burned more severely and experienced higher tree mortality than non-refugial plots, potentially due to the greater amount of time since the last fire, producing higher fuel accumulation. Although most sites maintained the pre-fire development stage, 19 percent of sites transitioned to Early development and 31 percent of sites converted from Closed to Open canopy. These structural transitions may contribute to forest restoration in fire-adapted forests where fire has been excluded for over a century, but this requires further analysis. View Full-Text
Keywords: burn severity; forest structure; succession; Cascade Range; restoration; mixed-conifer forest burn severity; forest structure; succession; Cascade Range; restoration; mixed-conifer forest
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolden, C.A.; Bleeker, T.M.; Smith, A.M.S.; Poulos, H.M.; Camp, A.E. Fire Effects on Historical Wildfire Refugia in Contemporary Wildfires. Forests 2017, 8, 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100400

AMA Style

Kolden CA, Bleeker TM, Smith AMS, Poulos HM, Camp AE. Fire Effects on Historical Wildfire Refugia in Contemporary Wildfires. Forests. 2017; 8(10):400. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100400

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kolden, Crystal A., Tyler M. Bleeker, Alistair M.S. Smith, Helen M. Poulos, and Ann E. Camp. 2017. "Fire Effects on Historical Wildfire Refugia in Contemporary Wildfires" Forests 8, no. 10: 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100400

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop