Next Article in Journal
Tree Species Selection in the Face of Drought Risk—Uncertainty in Forest Planning
Next Article in Special Issue
Forest Certification and Country of Origin: Choice Experiment Analysis of Outdoor Decking Material Selection in E-Commerce Market in Finland
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Changes in Water Use Efficiency to Understand Drought Induced Tree Mortality
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Analysis of Non-State and State Approaches for Forest Certification in Mexico
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2017, 8(10), 364; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100364

Forest Certification Perspectives in the Wood Products Supply Chain in Virginia, U.S.A.

1
Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2
Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Fred Cubbage
Received: 30 August 2017 / Revised: 11 September 2017 / Accepted: 18 September 2017 / Published: 26 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Forest Management and Forest Certification)
Full-Text   |   PDF [941 KB, uploaded 27 September 2017]   |  

Abstract

Participation among private forest owners, logging contractors, and wood products manufacturers in the forest certification sector remains low. Those that enroll are mainly large-acreage owners and specialized manufacturers. Little is known about certification perspectives across the supply chain and how they relate. Comparing what owners, contractors, and manufacturers think about certification would increase insight regarding sector growth. In this study, 2741 private forest owners, logging contractors, and wood products manufacturers in Virginia, U.S.A. were surveyed about their beliefs regarding the impact of certification on economic opportunities and image and the extent to which they think it positively affects the forestry sector and understand how to certify forestland. Co-orientation was used to map alignment and predictions between respondents. Owner and contractor responses were similar and predictions about each other mostly accurate, but manufacturer responses and predictions were largely incongruent. Manufacturers generally aligned more so with contractors than owners but contractors identified slightly more with owners. Owners and contractors shared perspectives and a discernable identity, whereas manufacturers viewed certification in a less positive light. Implications for participation in forest certification focus largely on interrelationships of actor perspectives regardless of scale and emphasize the roles each can play in the forest certification sector. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable forestry; private forest owners; logging contractors; wood products manufacturers; co-orientation sustainable forestry; private forest owners; logging contractors; wood products manufacturers; co-orientation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Munsell, J.F.; Ares, A.; Barrett, S.M.; Bond, B.H.; Gagnon, J.L. Forest Certification Perspectives in the Wood Products Supply Chain in Virginia, U.S.A.. Forests 2017, 8, 364.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top