Next Article in Journal
De Novo Assembly and Characterization of Bud, Leaf and Flowers Transcriptome from Juglans Regia L. for the Identification and Characterization of New EST-SSRs
Previous Article in Journal
Burning Potential of Fire Refuges in the Boreal Mixedwood Forest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Starvation on the Structure of Gut-Associated Bacterial Communities in the Chinese White Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus armandi)
Article

Host Defense Mechanisms against Bark Beetle Attack Differ between Ponderosa and Lodgepole Pines

1
Colorado State Forest Service, Colorado State University, 5060 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-5060, USA
2
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, E211 Plant Sciences Bldg., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177, USA
3
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, C202 Plant Sciences Bldg., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Christopher J. Fettig
Forests 2016, 7(10), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100248
Received: 30 June 2016 / Revised: 10 October 2016 / Accepted: 11 October 2016 / Published: 21 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Defense Physiology to Bark Beetles)
Conifer defenses against bark beetle attack include, but are not limited to, quantitative and qualitative defenses produced prior to attack. Our objective was to assess host defenses of lodgepole pine and ponderosa pine from ecotone stands. These stands provide a transition of host species for mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae; MPB). We asked two questions: (1) do the preformed quantitative host defenses (amount of resin) and (2) the preformed qualitative host defenses (monoterpene constituents) differ between lodgepole and ponderosa pines. We collected oleoresins at three locations in the Southern Rocky Mountains from 56 pairs of the pine species of similar size and growing conditions. The amount of preformed-ponderosa pine oleoresins exuded in 24 h (mg) was almost four times that of lodgepole pine. Total qualitative preformed monoterpenes did not differ between the two hosts, though we found differences in all but three monoterpenes. No differences were detected in α-pinene, γ-terpinene, and bornyl acetate. We found greater concentrations of limonene, β-phellandrene, and cymene in lodgepole pines, whereas β-pinene, 3-carene, myrcene, and terpinolene were greater in ponderosa pine. Although we found differences both in quantitative and qualitative preformed oleoresin defenses, the ecological relevance of these differences to bark beetle susceptibility have not been fully tested. View Full-Text
Keywords: quantitative defenses; qualitative defenses; Dendroctonus ponderosae; Pinus contorta; Pinus ponderosa quantitative defenses; qualitative defenses; Dendroctonus ponderosae; Pinus contorta; Pinus ponderosa
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

West, D.R.; Bernklau, E.J.; Bjostad, L.B.; Jacobi, W.R. Host Defense Mechanisms against Bark Beetle Attack Differ between Ponderosa and Lodgepole Pines. Forests 2016, 7, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100248

AMA Style

West DR, Bernklau EJ, Bjostad LB, Jacobi WR. Host Defense Mechanisms against Bark Beetle Attack Differ between Ponderosa and Lodgepole Pines. Forests. 2016; 7(10):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100248

Chicago/Turabian Style

West, Daniel R.; Bernklau, Elisa J.; Bjostad, Louis B.; Jacobi, William R. 2016. "Host Defense Mechanisms against Bark Beetle Attack Differ between Ponderosa and Lodgepole Pines" Forests 7, no. 10: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100248

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop