Next Article in Journal
Design and Experiment of the Mold for the Production Process of Natural Arc-Shaped Bamboo Laminated Lumber
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Green Infrastructure on Mitigating Urban Heat Island Effect: Current Status, Trends, and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short-Term Changes in the Soil Respiration of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance

1
Hainan Academy of Forestry (Hainan Academy of Mangrove), Haikou 571100, China
2
Hainan Wenchang Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Wenchang 571300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2025, 16(9), 1451; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091451
Submission received: 15 August 2025 / Revised: 4 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Hazards and Risk Management)

Abstract

Typhoon disturbances significantly influence forest carbon cycling by altering both physical structures and biogeochemical processes. Typhoon-induced fluctuations in soil respiration can substantially affect the carbon balance in forest ecosystems. In this study, we conducted a comparative investigation of soil respiration in plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia L. that were either affected or unaffected by the severe Typhoon Yagi, which ravaged Hainan Island, China, in 2024. The soil respiration and its components in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations in the coastal areas of Hainan, China, as well as their responses to environmental factors before and after typhoon disturbance, were investigated based on total soil respiration rate (Rs), heterotrophic respiration rate (Rh), 5 cm soil temperature (T5), and 10 cm soil moisture (W10) to support the carbon emission estimation in coastal sandy land plantations. The mean Rs and Rh in the typhoon-disturbed plots were (1.82 ± 0.16) and (1.19 ± 0.26) μmol·m−2·s−1, respectively, while those in the control plots were (2.62 ± 1.08) and (1.41 ± 0.23) μmol·m−2·s−1, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). In both plots, Rs exhibited a significant positive correlation with T5 (p < 0.01). The T5 correlation and Q10 values for soil respiration were significantly higher in the typhoon-disturbed plots than in the control plots (p < 0.05). W10 of the soil exhibited significant negative correlations with Rs and Rh in typhoon disturbance plots (p < 0.05). Consequently, typhoon disturbance markedly inhibited soil respiration and its components in the Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations, indicating substantial impacts of typhoons on soil respiration processes and carbon cycling within the forest ecosystem. This study provides key parameters and empirical evidence to improve the accuracy of soil carbon emission estimates in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations on coastal sandy soils affected by typhoon events.

1. Introduction

In recent years, global climate change has markedly influenced the carbon cycling within ecosystems. The dynamics of soil carbon sinks have received increasing attention as key sensitivity indicators of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change [1,2,3]. Since the Industrial Revolution, fossil fuel combustion has elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations to over 415 ppm [4], and climate models project a global temperature rise of 1.5–4.4 °C by the end of the 21st century [5]. Consequently, the stability of soil carbon sinks, comprising approximately two-thirds of the total terrestrial carbon sinks, is facing growing threats. Soil respiration, which represents the flux of CO2 released from soil organic carbon decomposition, is the second-largest carbon flux in terrestrial ecosystems following plant photosynthesis [6]. Globally, soil respiration accounts for approximately 80–98 Pg·C·yr−1, nearly tenfold higher than fossil fuel emissions, indicating that even minor fluctuations could substantially affect the atmospheric carbon balance [7].
Forest soil respiration is a key process governing material exchange among the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the lithosphere. Its dynamic fluctuations affect the carbon cycle balance, energy flow, and chemical element migration within the Earth’s surface system, making it an important entry point for understanding inter-sphere interactions in the Earth system. As the largest carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a pivotal role in global carbon balance. Soil respiration in forests comprises autotrophic respiration (Ra), originating from root metabolic activity, and heterotrophic respiration (Rh), generated by the microbial decomposition of organic matter. The dynamic equilibrium between these components directly governs the forest’s carbon sink capacity [8]. Low-latitude forests store approximately one-third to one-half of the global vegetation carbon (~200–500 Gt·C) and exhibit 30%–50% greater sensitivity in soil respiration to climate change than temperate forests [9]. However, previous research has primarily concentrated on subtropical forests, while the mechanisms regulating soil respiration in tropical forests, particularly those frequently affected by extreme disturbances, such as typhoons, remain inadequately understood.
Typhoon disturbances exert substantial effects on forest carbon cycling through the combined effects of physical disruption and biogeochemical processes. First, the mechanical damage directly caused by typhoons can increase the forest canopy openness by 50%–80%, resulting in a 2- to 3-fold increase in the surface solar radiation and expanding diurnal soil temperature fluctuations by 1.5–2 °C [10]. Second, post-typhoon litterfall inputs may surge to 3–5 times the normal annual level, significantly altering soil substrate availability and enhancing soil respiration by 30%–60% within 3–6 months [11]. Third, typhoons can modify local microclimatic conditions by bringing precipitation, which decreases soil temperature while increasing soil moisture, thereby affecting organic matter decomposition rates [12]. Although the short-term soil CO2 flux may rise by 20%–30% following typhoon events [12,13], soil respiration responses remain highly heterogeneous, and the influence of forest type and typhoon intensity on CO2 flux remains uncertain. Moreover, the differential responses of Ra and Rh to typhoon disturbances remain inadequately explored.
This study focused on the Casuarina equisetifolia L. coastal shelter forest in northern Hainan, a region experiencing an annual average of 2.6 typhoons between 1995 and 2020. Notably, Super Typhoon Rammasun (central wind speed: 60 m/s) in 2014 and Typhoon Yagi (58 m/s) in September 2024 severely damaged approximately 3.5 × 106 hm2 of forest. Because of the limited availability of dynamic soil respiration data following typhoon disturbances in this region, we hypothesized that typhoon disturbance would affect soil respiration and its components and alter the regulatory roles of environmental factors, ultimately increasing the temperature sensitivity of carbon release. To test this hypothesis, this study aimed to address three key issues: (1) accurate quantification of the temporal variation in soil respiration during the growing season after typhoon disturbance, (2) analysis of the effects of typhoon disturbance on the distinct components of soil respiration, and (3) identification of the principal environmental factors regulating soil respiration under typhoon influence. These findings are expected to clarify the role of typhoon disturbance in soil carbon cycling within Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations and provide a mechanistic basis for model-based carbon sink accounting for coastal ecosystems.

2. Experiment

2.1. Study Area

The study area is situated in Wenchang City, northeastern Hainan Island (N: 19°52′–20°03′; E: 110°57′–111°01′), within a tropical monsoon climate zone. The region has an average annual temperature of approximately 23.9 °C, with minimum temperatures rarely falling below 10 °C and extreme lows ranging from 0.3 to 6.6 °C. The annual precipitation averaged 1721.6 mm, with a pronounced seasonal distribution. The rainy season spans from May to November, accounting for 80% of the total annual precipitation, and includes the typhoon season (August–November). The dry season extends from December to April, contributing only 20% of the annual precipitation. This area is frequently affected by typhoons, averaging 2.6 occurrences per year. The average elevation is 30 m, and the soil is classified as coastal sandy soil. The dominant tree species are Casuarina equisetifolia L. and Cocos nucifera L.

2.2. Plot Arrangement

This study examined Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations following Typhoon Yagi in September 2024. Three fixed plots were randomly established in typhoon-disturbed areas with uniform soil conditions, each separated by over 30 m. In addition, three undisturbed control plots were established in the adjacent areas (Figure 1). Both the disturbed and control plots measured 20 m × 30 m, resulting in a total of six plots. The vegetation characteristics of the control and disturbance plots are summarized in Table 1.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Soil Respiration Measurement

The soil CO2 flux was measured using an automated soil respiration flux system (LI-8100A, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) via the dynamic closed chamber method. The built-in infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) had a precision of ±1.5% of the reading, with a 30 s sampling interval. The measurements were recorded continuously until the CO2 concentration rate stabilized, typically within 3–5 min. In December 2023, three 20 m × 10 m monitoring zones were established within each plot. Each zone was randomly equipped with three PVC soil respiration rings (inner diameter: 20 cm; height: 12 cm), resulting in nine rings per plot. Total soil respiration rate (Rs) was measured directly under natural conditions. Rh was determined using the trenching method [14,15,16], wherein four 1 m × 1 m isolation quadrats were established 1–2 m outside each plot in the four cardinal directions. The trenches were dug to a depth of 60–80 cm (until no fine roots were visible), and a double-layer polyethylene film (0.2 mm thick) was installed along the trench walls before backfilling with the original soil to restore the bulk density. All live vegetation within the quadrats was removed, and the PVC rings were installed using the same procedure as for the Rs measurements. Ra was calculated as Ra = RsRh, and the root contribution rate to soil respiration (Rc) was expressed as Rc = Ra/Rs × 100%. Soil respiration was measured between 9:00 and 11:00 on clear days during the early and late parts of each month from September 2024 to March 2025 using trenched quadrats that were maintained free of live plants. Moreover, the built-in temperature probe and moisture sensor were used to monitor 5 cm soil temperature (T5) and soil moisture of the 0–10 cm soil layer (W10).

2.3.2. Statistical Analysis

Data processing and analysis were conducted using Excel 2010 and SPSS 18.0. One-way ANOVA was applied to verify the differences in the group means, with Origin 2021 employed for graphical visualization. The regression model describing the relationship between soil respiration and T5 was established as follows [17,18,19]:
Rs = α × e β×T,
where Rs represents the soil respiration rate (μmol·CO2·m−2·s−1); T represents the T5 (°C); and α and β are the regression coefficients.
The temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil respiration can be calculated as [20,21]
Q10 = e 10×β,
where β is the regression coefficient derived from Equation (1).

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Soil Respiration, Soil Temperature, and Soil Moisture in Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance

As shown in Figure 2a, Rs in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plots affected by the super typhoon was significantly lower than in the control plots (p < 0.05). Specifically, Ra in the control plots was markedly higher than in the typhoon-disturbed plots (p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference in Rh was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). Compared with the control, T5 in the typhoon-disturbed plots was significantly higher (p < 0.05; Figure 2b). However, no significant differences in T5 were found between Rs and Rh in either the control or disturbed plots (p > 0.05). Following the super typhoon disturbance, W10 associated with Rs in the disturbed plots was significantly lower than that in the control plots (p < 0.01; Figure 2c). Similarly, W10 corresponding to Rh in the disturbed plots was significantly reduced compared with that of the control (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant difference in W10 was observed between Rs and Rh in the control plots (p < 0.05), whereas no such difference was detected in typhoon-disturbed plots.

3.2. Dynamic Trends of Soil Respiration in Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Typhoon Disturbance

As shown in Figure 3a, Rs exhibited significant temporal variation within seven months following typhoon disturbance (p < 0.05), displaying an inverted single-peak trend. In both the control and disturbance plots, Rs initially decreased and subsequently increased. In the control plot, the maximum and minimum Rs values were recorded in March (3.69 ± 0.27 μmol·m−2·s−1) and December (1.48 ± 0.11 μmol·m−2·s−1), respectively. In the typhoon-disturbed plot, the corresponding values occurred in October (2.60 ± 0.25 μmol·m−2·s−1) and December (0.87 ± 0.05 μmol·m−2·s−1).
In both typhoon-disturbed and non-disturbed (control) plots, the maximum and minimum T5 were recorded in September 2024 and January 2025, respectively. The monthly T5 showed significant temporal variation (p < 0.05) (Figure 3b). In the control plot, the maximum and minimum T5 were 26.03 ± 0.39 °C and 18.87 ± 0.22 °C, respectively. In contrast, in the typhoon-disturbed plot, the corresponding values were 28.79 ± 0.25 °C and 19.86 ± 0.35 °C.
In both the control and typhoon-disturbed plots, W10 exhibited significant temporal variation (p < 0.05, Figure 3c). The maximum values were recorded in September and October, whereas the minimum values occurred in March.
The temporal patterns of Rh and Ra closely mirrored those of Rs (Figure 3a and Figure 4), with all exhibiting an inverted single-peak trend. Significant temporal variability in Rh was observed between typhoon-disturbed and control plots across all months, except December (p < 0.05; Figure 3a). In both plots, Rh consistently decreased initially and then increased, with the control plot reaching its maximum in March (2.33 ± 0.29 μmol·m−2·s−1) and minimum in December (0.75 ± 0.09 μmol·m−2·s−1), while the disturbed plot peaked in October (2.13 ± 0.28 μmol·m−2·s−1) and reached its lowest value in December (0.64 ± 0.12 μmol·m−2·s−1). Similarly, Ra also showed significant temporal variability (p < 0.05; Figure 3b), following the same pattern of an initial decline followed by an increase. The control plot recorded the highest Ra in March (1.61 ± 0.28 μmol·m−2·s−1) and the lowest in December (0.74 ± 0.17 μmol·m−2·s−1), whereas the disturbed plot reached its maximum Ra in September (0.96 ± 0.21 μmol·m−2·s−1) and minimum in December (0.24 ± 0.06 μmol·m−2·s−1). Additionally, Rc showed significant temporal variability between typhoon-disturbed and control plots across all months (p < 0.05; Figure 3c). During the observation period, the mean Rc was 46.86% ± 1.49% in the control plot and 33.38% ± 0.79% in the disturbed plot, indicating a significant reduction of 13.48% following typhoon disturbance.
Following typhoon disturbance, soil respiration and its components in both the control and disturbed plots exhibited distinct seasonal variations. During the dry season (December–March), Rs in the control plot was significantly higher than that in the disturbed plot (p < 0.05, Figure 5a), whereas no significant difference was observed during the rainy season (September–November). In the dry season, Rh in the control plot also exceeded that in the disturbed plot (p < 0.05, Figure 5b). Conversely, during the rainy season, Rh in the control plot was significantly lower than that in the disturbed plot (p < 0.01). For Ra, significantly higher values were observed in the control plot during the dry season (p < 0.001), whereas no notable differences were detected between the two plots during the rainy season.

3.3. Correlations Between Soil Respiration and Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture of the Soil

In both the control and typhoon-disturbed plots, T5 was significantly positively correlated with Rs (p < 0.01) and showed a significant positive correlation with Rh (p < 0.05). In the typhoon-disturbed plot, W10 was significantly negatively correlated with both Rs and Rh (p < 0.05), whereas no such correlations were observed in the control plot (Table 2). The Q10 value of Rs in the control plot (1.90 ± 1.22) was significantly lower than that in the disturbed plot (2.29 ± 1.15) (p < 0.05), while that of Rh was significantly lower in the control plot (1.73 ± 1.20) than in the disturbed plot (2.01 ± 1.16) (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

4.1. Short-Term Effects of Typhoon Disturbance on Soil Respiration

As a major natural disturbance, typhoons profoundly influence the structure and function of forest ecosystems and alter soil carbon cycling [22,23]. Previous studies have suggested that typhoons can enhance soil respiration. For instance, Chiang et al. [24] reported that the mean annual soil respiration of four saplings increased from 7.65 to 9.13 t C·ha−1 following a typhoon, indicating a 19.3% increase in soil carbon emissions. Similar findings were reported by Maneke-Fiegenbaum et al. [25]. In contrast, this study suggested that typhoon disturbance suppressed soil respiration in the Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Specifically, Typhoon Yagi reduced the mean Rs by 22.9% in the short term, which may be attributed to the storm’s high intensity. As a Category 17 typhoon, Yagi caused severe structural damage, with approximately 90% of the trees snapped or uprooted, resulting in extensive root destruction and reduced soil respiration. The analysis of respiration components demonstrated no significant difference in mean Rh between the disturbed and control plots (p > 0.05), whereas the mean Ra in the control plot was significantly higher than that in the disturbed plot (p < 0.01), confirming that reduced autotrophic respiration due to root damage contributed to the observed decline in Rs.
Rh has been shown to account for 50%–68% of Rs in various forest ecosystems [26,27,28]. In this study, the mean Rh contributed 56.84% of Rs in the control plot and 67.35% in the typhoon-disturbed plot, indicating a marked increase in the relative contribution of Rh following typhoon disturbance. This increase may be attributed to the substantial litter input caused by extensive treefall and branch breakage in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations, which introduced abundant labile carbon substrates into the surface soil and stimulated microbial respiration [29,30]. This pattern is consistent with observations in older fallow fields, where greater soil organic carbon accumulation highlights how significant organic inputs enhance carbon availability and microbial activity [31]. Additionally, typhoon-induced root mortality likely increases root exudation and the availability of decomposable organic matter, thereby further promoting heterotrophic respiration [32].

4.2. Seasonal Effects of Typhoon Disturbance on Soil Respiration

Following typhoon disturbance, distinct seasonal patterns were observed in Rs, Rh, and Ra within Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. During the dry season, Rs and Rh were significantly higher in the control plot than in the disturbed plot. This difference was primarily attributed to the intact vegetation in the control plot, which maintained greater root activity through enhanced root metabolism and rhizodeposition, thereby sustaining higher Ra [33]. In contrast, vegetation damage in the disturbed plot (including root fractures and canopy loss) reduced photosynthetic capacity and suppressed root metabolic activity, thereby leading to significantly lower Ra [33]. Meanwhile, the relatively stable microbial community in the control plot facilitated continuous organic matter decomposition, whereas typhoon-induced alterations in soil temperature, moisture, and aeration disrupted the microbial environment in the disturbed plot, likely reducing microbial activity and suppressing Rh [34,35,36].
However, during the rainy season, increased precipitation elevated W10 in both plots. Excess water saturated soil pores, which limited oxygen diffusion and inhibited Rs to a similar extent in both plots; hence, no significant difference in Rs was observed [37,38]. Conversely, Rh was significantly higher in the disturbed plot during this season, likely due to the accumulation of readily decomposable plant debris and organic fragments following the typhoon. These substrates, combined with high soil moisture, stimulate microbial activity, thereby enhancing Rh [39].

4.3. Relationships Between Soil Respiration and Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture After Typhoon Disturbance

Soil temperature and moisture are the two primary factors that regulate soil respiration [40,41,42]. In this study, their effects on Rs and Rh differed significantly, and typhoon disturbances modified their regulatory roles. Specifically, T5 demonstrated a significant positive correlation with Rs in both control and disturbed plots (p < 0.01), indicating that elevated temperatures promoted soil respiration in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. This finding was consistent with the known temperature sensitivity of microbial and root metabolism, where increased soil temperature enhances microbial activity and root exudation to increase CO2 emissions [43]. Stronger correlations between Rs, Rh, and T5 were observed in the typhoon-disturbed plot than in the control plot (Table 1). This could be due to the canopy damage that increased the solar radiation at the soil surface, thereby amplifying the temperature response of soil respiration components [44]. Furthermore, Q10 of the disturbed plot was significantly higher than that of the control plot. This difference may have resulted from the increased availability of labile organic matter following the influx of litterfall, which decomposes more rapidly under elevated temperatures [45] and contributes to a higher Q10 value.
Soil moisture has been widely recognized as a key factor influencing soil respiration, although the findings remain inconsistent. Some studies have reported significant negative correlations between soil moisture and respiration [40,46], while others have observed positive correlations within specific soil moisture ranges [47,48] or no clear relationship at all [49,50]. In this study, W10 was significantly negatively correlated with Rs and Rh in the typhoon-disturbed plot (p < 0.05) compared to the control plot. This may be attributed to typhoon-induced structural damage to the soil, including reduced porosity and disrupted aggregates, which altered pore distribution and water movement. Elevated W10 during the rainy season could exacerbate the oxygen limitations of microorganisms, thereby inhibiting aerobic microbial respiration. Additionally, the affected gas exchange and diffusion due to structural changes may further suppress respiration [51]. It is worth noting that the sharp increase in W10 in the disturbed plot in October likely resulted from the combined effects of the rainy season and the substantial accumulation of plant debris and litterfall following the typhoon, which collectively enhanced soil water retention capacity (Figure 2). Although typhoon disturbance significantly influenced the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration, the effects of soil moisture appeared to be more dependent on site-specific vegetation and physical soil conditions. Future research should incorporate long-term observations and mechanistic modeling to quantify the sustained impacts of extreme climate events on soil carbon cycling.

5. Conclusions

This study, based on observations of Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations on northern Hainan Island following the disturbance of Typhoon Yagi, found that the typhoon significantly reduced Rs, primarily due to a notable decrease in Ra caused by root damage. Meanwhile, the disturbance altered the regulatory effects of environmental factors on Rs. Although T5 remained a strong positive predictor of Rs in typhoon-disturbed and control plots, W10 showed a significant negative correlation with Rs and Rh only in the disturbed stand. Furthermore, the increase in Q10 after disturbance suggests enhanced vulnerability of carbon release processes to climate change. These findings indicate that typhoons not only suppress carbon release in the short term but may also affect the long-term carbon balance of Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations by altering environmental regulatory mechanisms. The results provide new data and theoretical insights into the effects of frequent strong typhoons on soil respiration and carbon cycling in coastal protective forests under global climate change. However, this study was limited to 7 months of monitoring, which may not fully capture the long-term recovery dynamics of Rs components. Future studies should extend the observation period and incorporate dynamic monitoring of soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying soil respiration responses to typhoon disturbances.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D. and S.S.; methodology, L.D. and Z.C.; investigation, L.D., S.S., Z.L., S.N., Y.C., Z.C., X.L., J.J. and H.C.; data curation, L.D. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D.; writing—review and editing, S.N., Y.C. and Z.C.; project administration, S.S., Y.C. and Z.C.; funding acquisition, S.N., Y.C. and Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Hainan Province Department of Science and Technology (Technological Innovation Special Grant for Provincial Research Institutes, No. KYYSLK2023-014).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Peng, C.; Luo, Y.; Terrer, C.; Yue, C.; Peng, S.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; Shangguan, Z.; et al. Future soil organic carbon stocks in China under climate change. Cell Rep. Sustain. 2024, 1, 100179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, P.; Ding, S.; Liu, N.; Mo, Y.; Liang, Y.; Ma, J. Soil Microbial Community in Relation to Soil Organic Carbon and Labile Soil Organic Carbon Fractions under Detritus Treatments in a Subtropical Karst Region during the Rainy and Dry Seasons. Forests 2023, 14, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jia, J.; Liu, Z.; Haghipour, N.; Wacker, L.; Zhang, H.; Sierra, C.A.; Ma, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Luo, A.; et al. Molecular 14C evidence for contrasting turnover and temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter components. Ecol. Lett. 2023, 26, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, Z.; Wang, C. Responses of tree leaf gas exchange to elevated CO2 combined with changes in temperature and water availability: A global synthesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2021, 30, 2500–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, Y.; Gillett, N.P.; Monahan, A.H. Climate Model Projections of 21st Century Global Warming Constrained Using the Observed Warming Trend. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2019GL086757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Y.; Li, T.; Pokharel, P.; Liu, L.; Qiao, J.; Wang, Y.; An, S.; Chang, S.X. Global effects on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity depend on nitrogen addition rate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 174, 108814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Fang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y. Diurnal Dynamics of Soil Respiration: Relationship with Temperature and the Most Suitable Measuring Time. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2015, 1, 159–170. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun, H.R.; Xu, Z.Z.; Jia, B.R. A compiled soil respiration dataset at different time scales for forest ecosystems across China from 2000 to 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 2951–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alamgir, M.; Campbell, M.J.; Turton, S.M.; Pert, P.L.; Edwards, W.; Laurance, W.F. Degraded tropical rain forests possess valuable carbon storage opportunities in a complex, forested landscape. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, B.; Pan, L.; Xue, L. Effects of typhoons on forests. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 1596–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Xu, Q.; Yang, Q.; Su, T.; Fu, Q.; Yang, H.; Liu, W. Effects of forest gaps in tropical montane rainforest in Jianfengling, Hainan on soil respiration. Chin. J. Trop. Crop. 2021, 12, 3685–3691. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ma, Q.; Cao, R.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Yang, W. The immediate effect of typhoon disturbance on soil carbon fractions along a subtropical forest gap gradient. Catena 2025, 254, 108986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deng, Q.; Hui, D.; Chu, G.; Han, X.; Zhang, Q. Rain-induced changes in soil CO2 flux and microbial community composition in a tropical forest of China. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Savage, K.E.; Davidson, E.A.; Abramoff, R.Z.; Finzi, A.C.; Giasson, M.A. Partitioning soil respiration: Quantifying the artifacts of the trenching method. Biogeochemistry 2018, 140, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chin, M.Y.; Lau, S.Y.L.; Midot, F.; Jee, M.S.; Lo, M.L.; Sangok, F.E.; Melling, L. Root exclusion methods for partitioning of soil respiration: Review and methodological considerations. Pedosphere 2023, 33, 683–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sayer, E.J.; Tanner, E.V.J. A new approach to trenching experiments for measuring root–rhizosphere respiration in a lowland tropical forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Y.; Wang, G.; Xiang, D.; Zhou, S.; Xiong, L. Biophysical control of daytime and nighttime soil respiration during growing and non-growing seasons in a temperate deciduous forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2024, 350, 109998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Luo, W.; Zeng, G.; Yang, H.; Wang, M.; Lyu, Y.; Cheng, A.; Zhang, L.; Cai, X.; Chen, J.; et al. CO2 flux of soil respiration in natural recovering karst abandoned farmland in Southwest China. Acta Geochim. 2020, 39, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ming, G.; Zhang, Q.; Gong, W.; Wang, B.; Hu, H.; Tian, F. The characteristics of ecosystem respiration and its components of a representative film-mulched and drip-irrigated cotton field in Northwest China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 352, 108506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gromova, M.S.; Matvienko, A.I.; Makarov, M.I.; Cheng, C.H.; Menyailo, O.V. Temperature Sensitivity (Q10) of Soil Basal Respiration as a Function of Available Carbon Substrate, Temperature, and Moisture. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2020, 53, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, H.; Xia, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Liu, S. Temperature response of soil respiration decreases with latitude and elevation in abandoned croplands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2024, 363, 108862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.C.; Friend, A.; Huang, C. Simulating the effects of typhoon-induced defoliation on forest dynamics using a process-based model in a subtropical forest. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 23–28 July 2017; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 3503–3506. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ping, J.; Zhou, J.; Huang, K.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Xia, J. Modeling the typhoon disturbance effect on ecosystem carbon storage dynamics in a subtropical forest of China’s coastal region. Ecol. Model. 2021, 455, 109636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chiang, P.N.; Yu, J.C.; Lai, Y.J. Soil Respiration Variation among Four Tree Species at Young Afforested Sites under the Influence of Frequent Typhoon Occurrences. Forests 2021, 12, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maneke-Fiegenbaum, F.; Santos, S.H.; Klemm, O.; Yu, J.; Chiang, P.; Lai, Y. Carbon Dioxide Fluxes of a Young Deciduous Afforestation Under the Influence of Seasonal Precipitation Patterns and Frequent Typhoon Occurrence. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2021, 126, e2020JG005996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiao, Z.; Wang, X. Contrasting Rhizospheric and Heterotrophic Components of Soil Respiration during Growing and Non-Growing Seasons in a Temperate Deciduous Forest. Forests 2018, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, S.; Liu, L. Quantifying Components of Soil Respiration and Their Response to Abiotic Factors in Two Typical Subtropical Forest Stands, Southwest China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Phyo, Z.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sha, L.; Song, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liang, N.; Myo, S.T.Z.; Lu, Z.; Xu, K.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Soil Respiration Dynamics and Heterotrophic Respiration Sensitivity to Warming in a Subalpine Coniferous Forest and a Subtropical Evergreen Broadleaf Forest in Southwest China. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 24, 4522–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, L.; See, C.R.; Wang, H.; Cao, R.; Liang, G.; Zhang, A.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, B.; et al. Soil fauna trophic multifunctionality mediates the release of elements from decomposing typhoon-generated leaf litter. Funct. Ecol. 2025, 39, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiao, S.; Ye, G.; Zhang, L.; Jin, Z.; Liu, L. Soil heterotrophic respiration in Casuarina equisetifolia plantation at different stand ages. J. For. Res. 2009, 20, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arunrat, N.; Sereenonchai, S.; Kongsurakan, P.; Yuttitham, M.; Hatano, R. Variations of soil properties and soil surface loss after fire in rotational shifting cultivation in Northern Thailand. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1213181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, Q.; Kumar, P. Impacts of Landscape Evolution on Heterotrophic Carbon Loss in Intensively Managed Landscapes. Front. Water 2021, 3, 666278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nakane, K.; Tsubota, H.; Yamamoto, M. Cycling of soil carbon in a Japanese red pine forest II. Changes occurring in the first year after a clear-felling. Ecol. Res. 1986, 1, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Silva, S.; Kariyawasam Hetti Gamage, L.; Thapa, V.R. Impact of Drought on Soil Microbial Communities. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lao, Q.; Chen, F.; Jin, G.; Lu, X.; Chen, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, Q. Characteristics and mechanisms of typhoon-induced decomposition of organic matter and its implication for climate change. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2023, 128, e2023JG007518. [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Ji, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, L. A super typhoon disturbs organic contamination in agricultural soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2021, 8, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liang, G.; Stefanski, A.; Eddy, W.C.; Bermudez, R.; Montgomery, R.A.; Hobbie, S.E.; Rich, R.L.; Reich, P.B. Soil respiration response to decade-long warming modulated by soil moisture in a boreal forest. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 17, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Herbst, M.; Tappe, W.; Kummer, S.; Vereecken, H. The influence of soil structure on heterotrophic respiration response to soil water content. In Proceedings of the 22nd EGU General Assembly, Online, 4–8 May 2020; p. 3365. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rosado, I.I.M. Diversity and Dynamics of Arthropods and Microbes, and Nutrient Release during Green Litter Decomposition in a Simulated Hurricane Experiment. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad del Turabo, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, J.N.; Cui, R.; Chi, C.L.; Dong, L.B.; Zhang, J.L. The effect of experimental warming on soil respiration and its components of Quercus mongolica forest. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 22, 10367–10376. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, L.H.; Chen, Y.N.; Zhao, R.F.; Li, W.H. Impact of temperature and soil water content on soil respiration in temperate deserts, China. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 33, 936–949. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bao, X.; Zhu, X.; Chang, X.; Wang, S.; Xu, B.; Luo, C.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Rui, Y.; Cui, X. Effects of soil temperature and moisture on soil respiration on the tibetan plateau. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Eng, A.Y.; Narayanan, A.; Alster, C.J.; DeAngelis, K.M. Thermal adaptation of soil microbial growth traits in response to chronic warming. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0082523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hogan, J.A.; Sharpe, J.; Van Beusekom, A.; Stankavich, S.; Matta Carmona, S.; Bithorn, J.E.; Shiels, A.B. Solar radiation and soil moisture drive tropical forest understory responses to experimental and natural hurricanes. Ecosphere 2022, 13, e4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Conant, R.T.; Ryan, M.G.; Birge, H.E.; Davidson, E.A.; Eliasson, P.E.; Evans, S.E.; Frey, S.D.; Giardina, C.P.; Hopkins, F.M.; Hyvnen, R.; et al. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates—Synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17, 3392–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Han, G.; Sun, B.; Chu, X.; Xing, Q.; Song, W.; Xia, J. Precipitation events reduce soil respiration in a coastal wetland based on four-year continuous field measurements. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 256, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yan, J.X.; Feng, Y.; Li, J.; Li, H.J.; Ding, G. Response of soil respiration and Q10 to temperature and moisture in naturally regenerated and bare lands based on an 11-year observation period. Catena 2022, 208, 105711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, J.X.; Li, H.J.; Li, J.J.; Xue, Y.T.; Ding, G.W.; Shao, H.B. Response of soil respiration to temperature and soil moisture: Effects of different vegetation types on a small scale in the eastern loess plateau of China. Plant Biosyst. 2013, 147, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Luo, L.; Shen, G.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, L. Soil Respiration Components and Their Sensitivity to Temperature in Four Typical Forests along an Altitudinal Gradient in Shennongjia. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 35, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Xiong, D.; Lin, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. Analysis of Soil Respiration and Its Components in Castanopsis carlesii and Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2014, 38, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ma, J.; Pang, D.; He, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Li, X.; Chen, L. Response of soil respiration to short-term changes in precipitation and nitrogen addition in a desert steppe. J. Arid. Land 2023, 15, 1084–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the study area and sample plot locations.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the study area and sample plot locations.
Forests 16 01451 g001
Figure 2. Effects of typhoon disturbance on soil respiration components (a), T5 of each component (b), and W10 of each component (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and no significant differences, respectively.
Figure 2. Effects of typhoon disturbance on soil respiration components (a), T5 of each component (b), and W10 of each component (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and no significant differences, respectively.
Forests 16 01451 g002
Figure 3. Effects of typhoon disturbance on dynamic trends of Rs (a), T5 (b), and W10 (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations.
Figure 3. Effects of typhoon disturbance on dynamic trends of Rs (a), T5 (b), and W10 (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations.
Forests 16 01451 g003
Figure 4. Effects of typhoon disturbance on dynamic trends of Rh (a), Ra (b), and Rc (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, ***, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and no significant differences, respectively.
Figure 4. Effects of typhoon disturbance on dynamic trends of Rh (a), Ra (b), and Rc (c) in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, ***, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and no significant differences, respectively.
Forests 16 01451 g004
Figure 5. Effects of typhoon disturbance on seasonal trends of Rs (a), Rh (b), and Ra (c) during the dry and rainy seasons in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, ***, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and no significant differences, respectively. In the box plots, the dashed line within each box represents the median, and the solid line represents the mean.
Figure 5. Effects of typhoon disturbance on seasonal trends of Rs (a), Rh (b), and Ra (c) during the dry and rainy seasons in Casuarina equisetifolia L. plantations. Note: *, **, ***, and NS denote significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and no significant differences, respectively. In the box plots, the dashed line within each box represents the median, and the solid line represents the mean.
Forests 16 01451 g005
Table 1. Vegetation in the control plot and typhoon disturbance plot.
Table 1. Vegetation in the control plot and typhoon disturbance plot.
TreatmentAltitude (m)Soil TypeStand Age (Year)Diameter at Breast Height (cm)Tree Height (m)Crown DensityPlanting Density (Plant/ha)Stand Density (Plant/ha)Understory Vegetation
Control plot33Coastal sandy soil1013.46 ± 0.7610.40 ± 0.880.8714751401Bidens pilosa L.
Waltheria indica L.
Cyperus rotundus L.
Spermacoce pusilla Wallich.
Typhoon disturbance plot30Coastal sandy soil1014.17 ± 0.8510.85 ± 0.710.901370135Bidens pilosa L.
Cyperusrotundus L.
Table 2. Correlation analysis of Rs, Rh with T5 (°C) and W10.
Table 2. Correlation analysis of Rs, Rh with T5 (°C) and W10.
T5/°CW10/%
Rs of Control plot0.524 **−0.36
Rs of Typhoon disturbance0.889 **−0.58 *
Rh of Control plot0.517 *−0.27
Rh of Typhoon disturbance0.786 *−0.61 **
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Exponential regression model of T5 with Rs, Rh, and Q10.
Table 3. Exponential regression model of T5 with Rs, Rh, and Q10.
NFitting Equation Parameter αFitting Equation Parameter βQ10R2Fp
Rs of Control plot1260.50 ± 0.260.064 ± 0.0201.90 ± 1.220.62227.49<0.001
Rs of Typhoon disturbance1260.25 ± 0.090.083 ± 0.0142.29 ± 1.150.47247.04<0.001
Rh of Control plot 840.35 ± 0.160.055 ± 0.0181.73 ± 1.200.20283.63<0.001
Rh of Typhoon disturbance 840.23 ± 0.080.070 ± 0.0152.01 ± 1.160.34208.54<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, L.; Su, S.; Lin, Z.; Nong, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Lei, X.; Jia, J.; Chen, H. Short-Term Changes in the Soil Respiration of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance. Forests 2025, 16, 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091451

AMA Style

Du L, Su S, Lin Z, Nong S, Chen Y, Chen Z, Lei X, Jia J, Chen H. Short-Term Changes in the Soil Respiration of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance. Forests. 2025; 16(9):1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Limin, Shaofeng Su, Zhipan Lin, Shouqian Nong, Yiqing Chen, Zongzhu Chen, Xiangling Lei, Junting Jia, and Haihui Chen. 2025. "Short-Term Changes in the Soil Respiration of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance" Forests 16, no. 9: 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091451

APA Style

Du, L., Su, S., Lin, Z., Nong, S., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Lei, X., Jia, J., & Chen, H. (2025). Short-Term Changes in the Soil Respiration of Casuarina equisetifolia L. Plantations After Severe Typhoon Disturbance. Forests, 16(9), 1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop