Environmental Drivers of Regeneration in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea: Thresholds for Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Hainan’s Intertidal Zones
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Seed Collection
2.2. Study Materials
2.3. Experimental Design for Seed Germination
2.3.1. Temperature and Photoperiod
2.3.2. Salinity and Light Intensity
2.3.3. Soil Substrate
2.4. Experimental Design for Seedling Growth
2.4.1. Temperature
2.4.2. Salinity
2.4.3. Light Intensity
2.4.4. Flooding Regime
2.5. Data Collection
2.5.1. Germination Statistics
2.5.2. Seedling Growth and Physiology Statistics
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Environmental Factors on S. hydrophyllacea Seed Germination
3.1.1. Temperature Effects on Seed Germination
3.1.2. Photoperiod Effects on Seed Germination
3.1.3. Salinity Effects on Seed Germination
3.1.4. Substrate Composition Effects on Seed Germination
3.1.5. Light Intensity Effects on Seed Germination
3.2. Environmental Effects on S. hydrophyllacea Early Seedling Growth
3.2.1. Temperature Effects on Early Seedling Growth
3.2.2. Salinity Effects on Early Seedling Growth
3.2.3. Light Intensity Effects on Early Seedling Growth
3.2.4. Flooding Duration Effects on Early Seedling Growth
3.3. Effects of Flooding Duration on One-Year-Old S. hydrophyllacea Seedlings
3.3.1. Seedling Growth and Biomass Allocation
3.3.2. Photosynthetic Characteristics
3.3.3. Physiological Responses
4. Discussion
4.1. Environmental Controls on S. hydrophyllacea Seed Germination
4.2. Stress Effects on S. hydrophyllacea Seedling Growth Performance
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alongi, D.M. Carbon cycling in mangrove forests. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alongi, D.M. Impact of global change on nutrient dynamics in mangrove forests. Forests 2018, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamin, N.M.; Zakaria, R.; Hashim, R.; Yin, Y. Establishment of Avicennia marina mangroves on accreting coastline at Sungai Haji Dorani, Selangor, Malaysia. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2011, 94, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.M.; Ke, X.R.; Bai, H.; Deng, K.X.; Zhang, M.W.; Fang, Z.S.; Zhong, C.R.; Li, S.; Pan, M.; Tam, N.F.Y.; et al. A population structure and flowering traits in endangered Sonneratia mangroves: Conservation implications on Hainan Island, China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2025, 59, e03483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayen, S. Occurrence, bioavailability and toxic effects of trace metals and organic contaminants in mangrove ecosystems: A review. Environ. Int. 2012, 48, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Wang, M. The Mangroves of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.C.; Zhong, C.R. Research and restoration status of endangered mangrove plants in China. J. Oceanogr. 2021, 40, 142–153. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, H.; Sun, S.; Zheng, B.J.; Zhu, L.Q.; Li, H.K.; Liu, Q. Conservation Implications of Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Properties in Endangered Mangrove Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea on Hainan Island, China. Sustainability 2025, 17, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, W.P.; Kennedy, P.G.; Mitchell, B.J.; Ordónez, L.B.M. Supply-side ecology in mangroves: Do propagule dispersal and seedling establishment explain forest structure? Ecol. Monogr. 2007, 77, 53–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMillan, C. Environmental factors affecting seedling establishment of the black mangrove on the central Texas coast. Ecology 1971, 52, 927–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, T.J., III. Differential distribution between sub-species of the mangrove Ceriops tagal: Competitive interactions along a salinity gradient. Aquat. Bot. 1988, 32, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, F.Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, L.N.; Wang, S.Q. Seed Germination Traits of Endangered Mangrove Plant Sonneratia ovata. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 19, 5150–5156. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Cheng, X.L.; Lin, K.Y.; Xu, F.H.; Chen, Y.C. Study on Hypocotyls germination characteristics of mangrove plant ceriops tagal. J. Zhangjiang Norm. Coll. 2012, 33, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Zhong, C.R.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, Y. The Morphological Structure and Germination Characters of Seed of Enda ngered Mangrove Lumnitzera littorea (Jack.) Voigt. Mol. Plant Breed. 2016, 14, 2851–2858. [Google Scholar]
- Li, R.Q.; Wang, J.P. Plant Stress Physiology; Wuhan University Press: Wuhan, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Naidoo, G.; Rogalla, H.; Von-Willert, D.J. Gas exchange responses of a mangrove species, Avicennia marina, to waterlogged and drained conditions. Hydrobiologia 1997, 352, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Ling, Y.; Liao, N.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Liang, H.; Li, J.; Chen, F. Effects of Seed Biological Characteristics and Environmental Factors on Seed Germination of the Critically Endangered Species Hopea chinensis (Merr.) Hand.-Mazz. in China. Forests 2023, 14, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uarl, C. Effects of Salinity on Seed Germination and Early Seedling Stage; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M.; Saha, S.K.; Salekin, S.; Abdullah-al-Mamun; Siddique, M.R.; Abdullah, S.R. Salinity Influence On Germination Of Four Important Mangrove Species of The Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Agric. For. 2014, 60, 125–135. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Y.; Lu, C.; Hu, H.Y.; Tan, N.F.Y. Comparison of tolerance of three salt-secreting mangrove plants to salt stress. J. Ecol. 2004, 11, 171–196. [Google Scholar]
- Stearns, F.; Olson, J. Interactions of Photoperiod and Temperature Affecting Seed Germination in Tsuga canadensis. Amer. J. Bot. 1958, 45, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cumming, B.G. The dependence of germination on photoperiod, light quality, and temperature in Chenopodium spp. Can. J. Bot. 2011, 41, 1211–1233. [Google Scholar]
- Soltani, E.; Gruber, S.; Oveisi, M.; Salehi, N.; Alahdadi, I.; Javid, M.G. Water stress, temperature regimes and light control induction, and loss of secondary dormancy in Brassica napus L. seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2017, 27, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francis, J.K.; Rodríguez, A. Seeds of Puerto Rican Trees and Shrubs, 2nd ed.; Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 1993; pp. 383–386. [Google Scholar]
- Jayasuriya, K.M.G.; Wijetunga, A.S.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Seed dormancy and storage behaviour in tropical Fabaceae: A study of 100 species from Sri Lanka. Seed Sci. Res. 2013, 23, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, M.L.; Casasolai, P.M. Effect of burial by sand on seedling growth and survival in six tropical sand dune species from the Gulf of Mexico. J. Coast. Res. 1992, 12, 406–419. [Google Scholar]
- Wijayasinghe, K.; Hettiarachchi, M.; Weerakkody, W.; Amaratunga, K.; Yapa, P.; Premathilake, K. Seed dormancy diversity of the mangrove plant community in Sri Lanka to assist in direct seeding and seedling transplanting restoration. Seed Sci. Res. 2023, 33, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Lu, C.Y.; Wong, Y.S.; Tam, N.F.Y. Diaspore trait and inter-tidal zonation of non-viviparous mangrove species. Acta Bot. Sin. 2004, 46, 896–906. [Google Scholar]
- Akaji, Y.; Inoue, T.; Tomimatsu, H.; Kawanishi, A. Photosynthesis, respiration, and growth patterns of Rhizophora stylosa seedlings in relation to growth temperature. Trees 2019, 33, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez, N.; Medina, E. Salinity effect on plant growth and leaf demography of the mangrove, Avicennia germinans L. Trees 2005, 19, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basyuni, M.; Manalu, N.B. Impact of different salt levels on the seedling growth and root development of Bruguiera sexangula for the regeneration of mangroves. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 713, 012013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basyuni, M.; Keliat, D.A.; Lubis, M.U.; Manalu, N.B.; Syuhada, A.; Wati, R.; Yunasfi. Growth and root development of four mangrove seedlings under varying salinity. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 130, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.Q.; Lin, P. Effects of salinity on the growth of mangrove plant Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. J. Xiamen Univ. 1999, 02, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
- Dangremond, E.M.; Feller, I.C.; Sousa, W.P. Environmental tolerances of rare and common mangroves along light and salinity gradients. Oecologia 2015, 179, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.P.; Ye, Y.; Niedz, R.P. Effects of Salinity and Nutrient Addition on Mangrove Excoecaria agallocha. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pranchai, A.; Jenke, M.; Thongmee, J.; Sutthinon, P.; Karuna, S.; Wongkamhaeng, K.; Berger, U. Artificial macropores enhance mangrove establishment in hypersaline environments. Restor. Ecol. 2025, 33, e70015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.Z.; Lin, P.; Wang, W.Q. Research progress on flooding stress response of mangrove plants. J. Ecol. 2006, 02, 586–593. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.Z.; Wang, W.Q.; Lin, P. Influence of waterlogging time on the growth of Kandelia candel seedlings. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2004, 23, 149–158. [Google Scholar]
- Voesenek, L.; Colmer, T.D.; Pierik, R.; Millenaar, F.F.; Peeters, A.J. How plants cope with complete submergence. New Phytol. 2006, 170, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapin, F. The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1990, 21, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey-Serres, J.; Voesenek, L.A. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flexas, J.; Ribas-Carbó, M.; Bota, J.; Galmés, J.; Henkle, M.; Martínez-Cañellas, S.; Medrano, H. Decreased Rubisco activity during water stress is not induced by decreased relative water content but related to conditions of low stomatal conductance and chloroplast CO2 concentration. New Phytol. 2006, 172, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herms, D.A.; Mattson, W.J. The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 1992, 67, 283–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbs, J.; Greenway, H. Review: Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.H.; Wu, B.H.; Li, R.T.; Bao, S.M. Effects of flooding on SOD, POD activity and some nutrients of watermelon seedlings. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 05, 146–147+274. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, B.W.; Qiu, F.Y.; Zhang, L.E.; Han, J.; Guan, W. Adaptability of mangrove Avicennia marina seedlings to simulated tide-inundated times. Environ. Sci. 2010, 31, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, M.J. Studies on the Aegiceras corniculatum Seedlings in Response to Simulated Tidal Flooding Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, China Academy of Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China, 20 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, L.; Lin, P. Leaf anatomical responses to periodical waterlogging insimulated semidiurnal tides in mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhiza seedlings. Aquat. Bot. 2007, 86, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Treatment | GE (%) | GP (%) | MGT (d) | GL (d) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature | 25 °C | 1.33 ± 1.15 a | 1.33 ± 1.15 a | 77.00 ± 4.24 a | 77.00 ± 4.24 a |
30 °C | 9.33 ± 11.01 a | 10.00 ± 10.58 a | 57.01 ± 13.18 ab | 45.00 ± 11.00 b | |
35 °C | 6.66 ± 6.11 a | 6.66 ± 6.11 a | 37.79 ± 0.76 b | 33.00 ± 0.00 b | |
Photoperiod | 24L/0D | 16.66 ± 3.05 a | 17.33 ± 3.05 a | 57.11 ± 5.26 b | 48.33 ± 1.15 b |
12L/12D | 1.33 ± 1.15 b | 1.33 ± 1.15 b | 77.00 ± 4.24 a | 77.00 ± 4.24 a | |
0L/24D | - | - | - | - | |
Salinity | 0‰ | 36.66 ± 1.15 a | 40.67 ± 3.05 a | 59.72 ± 7.71 b | 50 ± 5.00 c |
2‰ | 36.66 ± 1.15 a | 26.66 ± 5.77 b | 85.40 ± 4.54 a | 69.00 ± 0.00 b | |
5‰ | 16.00 ± 6.00 b | 5.33 ± 7.57 c | 89.71 ± 5.25 a | 90.00 ± 0.00 a | |
10‰ | 0.00 ± 0.00 c | 2.00 ± 2.00 c | 97.25 ± 3.88 a | 94.5 ± 7.77 a | |
Soil substrate | Sand/potting soil (1:1 v/v) | 26.00 ± 2.00 a | 33.33 ± 3.05 ab | 74.40 ± 4.82 a | 61.00 ± 6.00 a |
Pure Sand | 29.33 ± 13.01 a | 40.66 ± 6.11 a | 80.50 ± 8.59 a | 67.00 ± 0.00 a | |
Sand/potting soil (2:1 v/v) | 25.33 ± 8.08 a | 38.00 ± 2.00 ab | 78.13 ± 9.42 a | 61.00 ± 6.00 a | |
Sand/red soil (2:1 v/v) | 26.67 ± 11.55 a | 26.66 ± 11.54 b | 71.03 ± 3.70 a | 58.00 ± 3.00 a | |
Light intensity | 12,000 lux | 1.33 ± 1.15 b | 1.33 ± 1.15 b | 77.00 ± 4.24 a | 77.00 ± 4.24 a |
25,000 lux | 36.66 ± 1.15 a | 40.67 ± 3.05 a | 59.72 ± 7.71 b | 50 ± 5.00 b |
Treatment | Seedling Height Increment (cm) | Crown Expansion Increment (cm) | Number of Blades | Root Length (cm) | Mortality (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature | 25 °C | 0.22 ± 0.07 b | 0.33 ± 0.16 a | 3.50 ± 1.44 b | 4.40 ± 1.79 a | 20 |
30 °C | 0.35 ± 0.10 a | 0.45 ± 0.18 a | 5.50 ± 1.87 a | 4.65 ± 1.11 a | 0 | |
35 °C | 0.23 ± 0.09 b | 0.35 ± 0.15 a | 3.83 ± 0.57 b | 2.16 ± 0.45 b | 73.33 | |
Salinity | 0‰ | 0.32 ± 0.08 a | 0.22 ± 0.08 a | 3.86 ± 1.76 a | 4.43 ± 1.08 a | 0 |
5‰ | 0.30 ± 0.07 a | 0.29 ± 0.19 a | 2.61 ± 0.96 a | 3.39 ± 0.85 b | 6 | |
10‰ | 0.16 ± 0.05 b | 0.24 ± 0.13 a | 2.75 ± 1.03 a | 3.02 ± 0.72 b | 46 | |
20‰ | 0.17 ± 0.08 b | 0.19 ± 0.10 a | 2.20 ± 0.63 b | 3.09 ± 1.01 b | 66 | |
Light intensity | 6000 lux | 0.32 ± 0.08 a | 0.22 ± 0.08 b | 3.86 ± 1.76 a | 4.43 ± 1.08 a | 0 |
25,000 lux | 0.33 ± 0.10 a | 0.36 ± 0.14 a | 4.66 ± 1.79 a | 4.16 ± 1.12 a | 0 | |
Flooding rhythm | 0 h | 0.32 ± 0.08 b | 0.22 ± 0.08 b | 3.86 ± 1.76 b | 4.43 ± 1.08 a | 0 |
4 h | 0.33 ± 0.09 b | 0.28 ± 0.11 a | 5.20 ± 1.01 a | 4.50 ± 0.43 a | 0 | |
8 h | 0.38 ± 0.12 a | 0.36 ± 0.17 a | 4.53 ± 1.35 ab | 4.41 ± 0.84 a | 0 | |
12 h | 0.41 ± 0.09 a | 0.37 ± 0.14 a | 4.84 ± 1.28 ab | 4.73 ± 0.60 a | 13.33 |
Flooding Rhythm | Growth Amount | Dry Biomass | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seedling Height Increment (cm) | Basal Diameter Increment (mm) | Increment in Leaf Number | Root Dry Weight (g) | Stem Dry Weight (g) | Leaf Dry Weight (g) | Total Dry Weight (g) | |
0 h | 11.18 ± 3.13 a | 2.49 ± 0.61 ab | 5.86 ± 3.29 ab | 1.04 ± 0.70 a | 0.53 ± 0.48 b | 0.60 ± 0.23 a | 2.18 ± 1.29 ab |
4 h | 11.80 ± 2.46 a | 2.55 ± 0.62 a | 7.80 ± 3.70 a | 0.35 ± 0.12 a | 0.40 ± 0.12 b | 0.68 ± 0.05 a | 1.45 ± 0.26 b |
8 h | 10.22 ± 2.36 a | 2.70 ± 0.64 a | 6.06 ± 4.43 ab | 0.96 ± 0.53 a | 0.83 ± 0.31 b | 0.81 ± 0.34 a | 2.61 ± 1.14 ab |
12 h | 7.56 ± 2.28 b | 2.05 ± 0.73 b | 4.93 ± 3.75 b | 1.25 ± 0.59 a | 1.03 ± 0.18 a | 0.78 ± 0.28 a | 3.07 ± 1.04 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, H.; Zheng, B.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Lv, X.; Zhong, C.; Bai, H. Environmental Drivers of Regeneration in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea: Thresholds for Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Hainan’s Intertidal Zones. Forests 2025, 16, 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081346
Yang H, Zheng B, Li J, Chen X, Lv X, Zhong C, Bai H. Environmental Drivers of Regeneration in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea: Thresholds for Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Hainan’s Intertidal Zones. Forests. 2025; 16(8):1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081346
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Haijie, Bingjie Zheng, Jiayi Li, Xu Chen, Xiaobo Lv, Cairong Zhong, and He Bai. 2025. "Environmental Drivers of Regeneration in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea: Thresholds for Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Hainan’s Intertidal Zones" Forests 16, no. 8: 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081346
APA StyleYang, H., Zheng, B., Li, J., Chen, X., Lv, X., Zhong, C., & Bai, H. (2025). Environmental Drivers of Regeneration in Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea: Thresholds for Seed Germination and Seedling Establishment in Hainan’s Intertidal Zones. Forests, 16(8), 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081346