Quantitative Techniques for Sustainable Decision Making in Forest-to-Lumber Supply Chain: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Method
2.1. Research Questions
2.2. Search Strategy
2.3. Selection and Evaluation Process
2.4. Analysis and Synthesis
3. Results
3.1. Forest
3.1.1. Forest Entities and Sustainability
3.1.2. Forest Entities: One Sustainability Dimension
3.1.3. Forest Entities: Two Sustainability Dimensions
3.1.4. Forest Entities: Three Sustainability Dimensions
3.2. Transport
3.2.1. Transport Entities and Sustainability
3.2.2. Transport Entities: One Sustainability Dimension
3.2.3. Transport Entities: Two Sustainability Dimensions
3.3. Sawmill
3.3.1. Sawmill Entities and Sustainability
3.3.2. Sawmill Entities: One Sustainability Dimension
3.3.3. Sawmill Entities: Two Sustainability Dimensions
3.3.4. Sawmill Entities: Three Sustainability Dimensions
3.4. Other Entities
3.4.1. Other Entities and Sustainability
3.4.2. Other Entities: One Sustainability Dimension
3.4.3. Other Entities: Two Sustainability Dimensions
3.4.4. Other Entities: Three Sustainability Dimensions
4. Analysis
5. Conclusions
- Include a broader approach that considers the social impact of operations in the forest supply chain and not only focuses on economic or environmental aspects. Identifying and developing metrics that more fully reflect the social impact of forestry activities is required, as well as considering the social conflicts that may arise in local contexts.
- Evaluate the adaptability of Industry 4.0 and data science using sensors for different entities in the forest-to-lumber supply chain.
- Value the contribution of competitiveness and collaboration through a game theory approach of the different entities in the forest-to-lumber supply chain to drive efficiencies, reduce costs, and strengthen the sector’s competitiveness, thus contributing to a more agile and sustainable transportation system.
- Evaluate the integral preventive management of forest fires, water consumption, and nutrient depletion of the soils where planted forests are located.
- Analyze the environmental impacts and social conflicts produced by the forestry supply chain affecting indigenous people in their worldview and natural environment.
- Evaluate the social impact generated when mechanizing and automating work in high-volume tasks in the forestry industry.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brundtland, G.H. World Commission on Environment and Development ONU. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Mebratu, D. Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1998, 18, 483–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcalde-Calonge, A.; Ruiz-Palomino, P.; Sáez-Martínez, F.J. The Circularity of the Business Model and the Performance of Bioeconomy Firms: An Interactionist Business-Environment Model. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2022, 9, 2140745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.; da Silva, C.; Carvalho, A. Opportunities and Challenges in Sustainable Supply Chain: An Operations Research Perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 268, 399–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purvis, B.; Mao, Y.; Robinson, D. Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rönnqvist, M. Optimization in Forestry. Math. Program. Ser. B 2003, 97, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, J.; Borland, H.; Orlitzky, M.; Lindgreen, A. Seeing Versus Doing: How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics. 2020, 164, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, R.; Morales, R.; Serón, J.; Weintraub, A. Use of OR Systems in the Chilean Forest Industries. Interfaces 1999, 29, 7–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Amours, S.; Rönnqvist, M.; Weintraub, A. Using Operational Research for Supply Chain Planning in the Forest Products Industry. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2008, 46, 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weintraub, A. Using Mathematical Models in the Management of Forest Industries. In Applied Decision Analysis; Girón, F.J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 85–97. ISBN 978-94-017-0759-6. [Google Scholar]
- Päivinen, R.; Lindner, M.; Rosén, K.; Lexer, M.J. A Concept for Assessing Sustainability Impacts of Forestry-Wood Chains. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marta, C.; Maurizio, C.; Giacomo, C.; Marco, B.; Alessandro, P. A Social Assessment of Forest Resource Based on Stakeholders’ Perception: An Application in Three Balkans Rural Areas. J. For. Res. 2020, 25, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambero, C.; Sowlati, T. Assessment and Optimization of Forest Biomass Supply Chains from Economic, Social and Environmental Perspectives—A Review of Literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 36, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başkent, E.Z. A Review of the Development of the Multiple Use Forest Management Planning Concept. Int. Forest. Rev. 2018, 20, 296–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, A.; Carvalho, A.; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.; Marques, A.; Amorim, P. Assessment and Optimization of Sustainable Forest Wood Supply Chains—A Systematic Literature Review. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 105, 112–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, J.M.; Partidario, M.R. Plurality in Sustainability—Multipe Understandings with a Variable Geometry. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Vance, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Hartley, D. Data Analytics for Enhancement of Forest and Biomass Supply Chain Management. Curr. For. Rep. 2020, 6, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mobtaker, A.; Ouhimmou, M.; Audy, J.-F.; Rönnqvist, M. A Review on Decision Support Systems for Tactical Logistics Planning in the Context of Forest Bioeconomy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 148, 111250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Turner, P. A Systematic Review on Technologies and Industry 4.0 in the Forest Supply Chain: A Framework Identifying Challenges and Opportunities. Logistics 2021, 5, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Väätäinen, K.; Anttila, P.; Eliasson, L.; Enström, J.; Laitila, J.; Prinz, R.; Routa, J. Roundwood and Biomass Logistics in Finland and Sweden. Croat. J. Eng. 2021, 42, 39–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chabanet, S.; Bril El-Haouzi, H.; Morin, M.; Gaudreault, J.; Thomas, P. Toward Digital Twins for Sawmill Production Planning and Control: Benefits, Opportunities, and Challenges. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 2190–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tham, L.T.; Pretzsch, J.; Darr, D. Asian Timber Value Chains- a Systematic Review and Research Agenda. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 112, 102116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.; Brennan, S.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldhahn, C.; Cabane, E.; Chanana, M. Sustainability in Wood Materials Science: An Opinion about Current Material Development Techniques and the End of Lifetime Perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2021, 379, 20200339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kenessey, Z. The Primary, Secondary, Tertiary and Quaternary Sectors of the Economy. Rev. Income Wealth 1987, 33, 359–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, D.; Bumgardner, M. Challenges and Opportunities for North American Hardwood Manufacturers to Adopt Customization Strategies in an Era of Increased Competition. Forests 2018, 9, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, K.; Bergman, R.; Alanya-Rosenbaum, S.; Gu, H.; Liang, S. Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Based Products: A Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hietala, J.; Hänninen, R.; Kniivilä, M.; Toppinen, A. Strategic Management Towards Competitive Advantage—Patterns of Internationalization in the Finnish and Swedish Sawmill Industries. Curr. For. Rep. 2019, 5, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zargar, S.; Roy, B.B.; Li, Q.; Gan, J.; Ke, J.; Liu, X.; Tu, Q. The Application of Industrial Ecology Methods to Understand the Environmental and Economic Implications of the Forest Product Industries. Curr. For. Rep. 2022, 8, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Rodríguez, F.; Nunes, L.; Azevedo, J. Solving Multi-Objective Problems for Multifunctional and Sustainable Management in Maritime Pine Forest Landscapes. Climate 2018, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, F.; Jaeger, D.; Hanewinkel, M. Digitization in Wood Supply—A Review on How Industry 4.0 Will Change the Forest Value Chain. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 162, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picchio, R.; Proto, A.R.; Civitarese, V.; Di Marzio, N.; Latterini, F. Recent Contributions of Some Fields of the Electronics in Development of Forest Operations Technologies. Electronics 2019, 8, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxena, A.; Buettner, W.C.; Kestler, L.; Kim, Y.-S. Opportunities and Barriers for Wood-Based Infrastructure in Urban Himalayas: A Review of Selected National Policies of Nepal. Trees For. People 2022, 8, 100244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsioras, P.A.; Karaszewski, Z. RFID Implementations in the Wood Supply Chains: State of the Art and the Way to the Future. Drewno 2022, 65, 072022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes Silva, F.J.; Kirytopoulos, K.; Pinto Ferreira, L.; Sá, J.C.; Santos, G.; Cancela Nogueira, M.C. The Three Pillars of Sustainability and Agile Project Management: How Do They Influence Each Other. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2022, 29, 1495–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uusitalo, J.; Pearson, M. Introduction to Forest Operations and Technology; JVP Forest Systems Oy.: Hämeenlinna, Finland, 2010; ISBN 952-92-5269-2. [Google Scholar]
- Lundholm, A.; Corrigan, E.; Nieuwenhuis, M. Implementing Climate Change and Associated Future Timber Price Trends in a Decision Support System Designed for Irish Forest Management and Applied to Ireland’s Western Peatland Forests. Forests 2019, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, U.F. Analysis of Forest Wood Supply Chains for Round-Wood Production Restricted by Technical Constraints. For. Syst 2019, 28, eSC01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarrazin, F.; Le Bel, L.; Lehoux, N. Analyzing the Impact of Implementing a Logistics Center for a Complex Forest Network. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushakhian, S.; Ouhimmou, M.; Rönnqvist, M. Salvage Harvest Planning for Spruce Budworm Outbreak Using Multistage Stochastic Programming. Can. J. For. Res. 2020, 50, 953–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rijal, B.; Le Bel, L.; Gautam, S.H.; Cantegril, P. A Sequential Optimization Approach in Tactical Planning for Value Creation in the Forest Products Industry. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roth, A.; Pinta, F.; Negny, S.; Montastruc, L. Importing Participatory Practices of the Socio-Environmental Systems Community to the Process System Engineering Community: An Application to Supply Chain. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2021, 155, 107530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, D.; Handler, R.M. Life-Cycle Assessment of Forest Harvesting and Transportation Operations in Tennessee. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 176, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marto, M.; Reynolds, K.; Borges, J.; Bushenkov, V.; Marques, S.; Marques, M.; Barreiro, S.; Botequim, B.; Tomé, M. Web-Based Forest Resources Management Decision Support System. Forests 2019, 10, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozgeris, G.; Kazanavičiūtė, V.; Juknelienė, D. Does Aiming for Long-Term Non-Decreasing Flow of Timber Secure Carbon Accumulation: A Lithuanian Forestry Case. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, S.; Li, J.; Guan, X.; Gao, X.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Mi, F.; Li, D. The Evaluation of Forestry Ecological Security in China: Developing a Decision Support System. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 91, 664–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sears, R.R.; Cronkleton, P.; Miranda Ruiz, M.; Pérez-Ojeda Del Arco, M. Hiding in Plain Sight: How a Fallow Forestry Supply Chain Remains Illegitimate in the Eyes of the State. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2021, 4, 681611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, P.H.D.; Gomide, L.R.; Figueiredo, E.O.; Carvalho, L.M.T.D.; Ferraz-Filho, A.C. Optimal Selective Logging Regime and Log Landing Location Models: A Case Study in the Amazon Forest. Acta Amaz. 2018, 48, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- She, J.; Chung, W.; Han, H. Economic and Environmental Optimization of the Forest Supply Chain for Timber and Bioenergy Production from Beetle-Killed Forests in Northern Colorado. Forests 2019, 10, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marano, G.; Langella, G.; Basile, A.; Cona, F.; De Michele, C.; Manna, P.; Teobaldelli, M.; Saracino, A.; Terribile, F. A Geospatial Decision Support System Tool for Supporting Integrated Forest Knowledge at the Landscape Scale. Forests 2019, 10, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundholm, A.; Black, K.; Corrigan, E.; Nieuwenhuis, M. Evaluating the Impact of Future Global Climate Change and Bioeconomy Scenarios on Ecosystem Services Using a Strategic Forest Management Decision Support System. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossit, D.; Pais, C.; Weintraub, A.; Broz, D.; Frutos, M.; Tohmé, F. Stochastic Forestry Harvest Planning under Soil Compaction Conditions. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 296, 113157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- She, J.; Chung, W.; Vergara, H. Multiobjective Record-to-record Travel Metaheuristic Method for Solving Forest Supply Chain Management Problems with Economic and Environmental Objectives. Nat. Resour. Model. 2021, 34, e12256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paluš, H.; Slašťanová, N.; Parobek, J.; Čerešňa, R. Proposal of a Model for the Implemantation of Environmentally Sustainable Purchasing in Wood Processing Industry. Acta. Fac. Xylologiae Zvolen 2023, 65, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teymourifar, A.; Trindade, M.A.M. A Framework to Design and Evaluate Green Contract Mechanisms for Forestry Supply Chains. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, R.R.; Fraj-Andrés, E.; Rojo-Alboreca, A.; Gracioli, C.R. Implementation of Forest Certification in Brazil, Spain And Portugal: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Application. Int. Forest. Rev. 2019, 21, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eggers, J.; Holmgren, S.; Nordström, E.-M.; Lämås, T.; Lind, T.; Öhman, K. Balancing Different Forest Values: Evaluation of Forest Management Scenarios in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 103, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacchelli, S.; Bernetti, I. Integrated Management of Forest Ecosystem Services: An Optimization Model Based on Multi-Objective Analysis and Metaheuristic Approach. Nat. Resour. Res. 2019, 28, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenslade, C.; Murphy, R.; Morse, S.; Griffiths, G.H. Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Factors Limiting Woodland Management and Sustainable Local Wood Product Use in the South East of England. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hildebrandt, J.; Bezama, A.; Thrän, D. Insights from the Sustainability Monitoring Tool SUMINISTRO Applied to a Case Study System of Prospective Wood-Based Industry Networks in Central Germany. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thrippleton, T.; Blattert, C.; Bont, L.G.; Mey, R.; Zell, J.; Thürig, E.; Schweier, J. A Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Strategic Planning at the Swiss Forest Enterprise Level: Coping with Climate Change and Shifting Demands in Ecosystem Service Provisioning. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2021, 4, 693020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başkent, E.Z.; Kašpar, J. Exploring the Effects of Management Intensification on Multiple Ecosystem Services in an Ecosystem Management Context. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 518, 120299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krsnik, G.; Reynolds, K.M.; Murphy, P.; Paplanus, S.; Garcia-Gonzalo, J.; González Olabarria, J.R. Forest Use Suitability: Towards Decision-Making-Oriented Sustainable Management of Forest Ecosystem Services. Geogr. Sustain. 2023, 4, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lämås, T.; Sängstuvall, L.; Öhman, K.; Lundström, J.; Årevall, J.; Holmström, H.; Nilsson, L.; Nordström, E.-M.; Wikberg, P.-E.; Wikström, P.; et al. The Multi-Faceted Swedish Heureka Forest Decision Support System: Context, Functionality, Design, and 10 Years Experiences of Its Use. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2023, 6, 1163105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terribile, F.; Acutis, M.; Agrillo, A.; Anzalone, E.; Azam-Ali, S.; Bancheri, M.; Baumann, P.; Birli, B.; Bonfante, A.; Botta, M.; et al. The LANDSUPPORT Geospatial Decision Support System (S-DSS) Vision: Operational Tools to Implement Sustainability Policies in Land Planning and Management. Land Degrad. Dev. 2024, 35, 813–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franca, C.S.S.; Persson, U.M.; Carvalho, T.; Lentini, M. Quantifying Timber Illegality Risk in the Brazilian Forest Frontier. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 6, 1485–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holzfeind, T.; Kanzian, C.; Gronalt, M. Challenging Agent-Based Simulation for Forest Operations to Optimize the European Cable Yarding and Transport Supply Chain. Int. J. For. Eng. 2021, 32, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palander, T.; Haavikko, H.; Kortelainen, E.; Kärhä, K.; Borz, S.A. Improving Environmental and Energy Efficiency in Wood Transportation for a Carbon-Neutral Forest Industry. Forests 2020, 11, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kühmaier, M.; Kral, I.; Kanzian, C. Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Forest Supply Chain in Austria in the Year 2018. Sustainability 2022, 14, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogler, C.; Rauch, P. A Discrete-Event Simulation Model to Test Multimodal Strategies for a Greener and More Resilient Wood Supply. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 1298–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keramati, A.; Lu, P.; Sobhani, A.; Haji Esmaeili, S.A. Impact of Forest Road Maintenance Policies on Log Transportation Cost, Routing, and Carbon-Emission Trade-Offs: Oregon Case Study. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2020, 146, 04020028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Höök, C.; Asmoarp, V.; Edlund, B.; Bergström, D. A Method of Finding HCT Roundwood Corridors for Reduction of GHG Emissions and Fuel Costs in Sweden. Forests 2020, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flisberg, P.; Rönnqvist, M.; Willén, E.; Frisk, M.; Friberg, G. Spatial Optimization of Ground-Based Primary Extraction Routes Using the BestWay Decision Support System. Can. J. For. Res. 2021, 51, 675–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palander, T.; Vesa, L. Data-Driven Optimization of Forestry and Wood Procurement toward Carbon-Neutral Logistics of Forest Industry. Forests 2022, 13, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuna, M.; Sánchez-García, S.; Canga, E. An Optimization Approach to Assess the Impact of Drying and Dry Matter Losses of Eucalyptus Globulus Roundwood and Biomass on Supply Chains Costs and GHG Emissions. Forests 2022, 13, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogler, C.; Rauch, P. Lead Time and Quality Driven Transport Strategies for the Wood Supply Chain. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2023, 47, 100946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 14040; Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
- ISO 14044; Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
- Ben Ali, M.; D’Amours, S.; Gaudreault, J.; Carle, M.-A. Configuration and Evaluation of an Integrated Demand Management Process Using a Space-Filling Design and Kriging Metamodeling. Oper. Res. Perspect. 2018, 5, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergara, F.; Palma, C.; Nelson, J. Modeling Lean and Agile Approaches: A Western Canadian Forest Company Case Study. Forests 2018, 9, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kühle, S.; Teischinger, A.; Gronalt, M. Form-Based Postponement in the Solid Hardwood Supply Network. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2019, 6, 1701887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben Ali, M.; D’amours, S.; Gaudreault, J.; Carle, M.-A. Integrating Revenue Management and Sales and Operations Planning in a Make-To-Stock Environment: Softwood Lumber Case Study. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2019, 57, 314–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumetz, L.; Gaudreault, J.; El-Haouzi, H.B.; Thomas, A.; Lehoux, N.; Marier, P. Simulation and Evaluation of Coordination Mechanisms for a Decentralized Lumber Production System with Coproduction. For. Prod. J. 2019, 69, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babuka, R.; Sujová, A.; Kupčák, V. Cascade Use of Wood in the Czech Republic. Forests 2020, 11, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Layton, R.J.; Horta Arduin, R.; Yazdeen, H.; Pommier, R.; Sonnemann, G. Material Flow Analysis to Evaluate Supply Chain Evolution and Management: An Example Focused on Maritime Pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armir, N.A.; Zakaria, S.; Begum, R.A.; Ariff, N.M.; Chamhuri, N.; Harun, J.; Talib, N.M.; Kadir, M.A. Factors Affecting Industrial Localization of Timber Mills in Peninsular Malaysia by Econometric and Spatial Analysis. Env. Dev Sustain 2022, 24, 7833–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sodiya, O.E.; Parajuli, R.; Abt, R.C.; Gray, J. Spatial Analysis of Forest Product Manufacturers in North Carolina. For. Sci. 2023, 69, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egri, P.; Dávid, B.; Kis, T.; Krész, M. Robust Facility Location in Reverse Logistics. Ann Oper Res 2023, 324, 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Hansen, D.W.; Chen, Z. Leveraging Digital Twins to Support Industrial Symbiosis Networks: A Case Study in the Norwegian Wood Supply Chain Collaboration. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, R.; Campanella, S.; Corsano, G.; Montagna, J.M. Optimal Design of a Forest Supply Chain in Argentina Considering Economic and Social Aspects. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, H.; Han, H.; Cho, S.; Jung, G.; Kim, B.; Ryu, J.; Won, H.K.; Park, J. Investigating the Optimal Location of Potential Forest Industry Clusters to Enhance Domestic Timber Utilization in South Korea. Forests 2020, 11, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghizadeh, K.; Zimon, D.; Jum’a, L. Modeling and Optimization Sustainable Forest Supply Chain Considering Discount in Transportation System and Supplier Selection under Uncertainty. Forests 2021, 12, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kühle, S.; Teischinger, A.; Gronalt, M. Optimal Location of Laminated Beech Production Plants within the Solid Hardwood Supply Network in Austria. Silva Fenn. 2019, 53, 10074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagarda-Leyva, E.A.; Acosta-Quintana, M.P.G.; Portugal-Vásquez, J.; Naranjo-Flores, A.A.; Bueno-Solano, A. System Dynamics and Sustainable Solution: The Case in a Large-Scale Pallet Manufacturing Company. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanya-Rosenbaum, S.; Bergman, R.D.; Ganguly, I.; Pierobon, F. A Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Briquetting Logging Residues and Lumber Manufacturing Coproducts in Western United States. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2018, 34, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, S.; Marchamalo, M.; Alvarez, S. Organization Environmental Footprint Applying a Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Case Study of a Wood Parquet Company in Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 618, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taskhiri, M.S.; Jeswani, H.; Geldermann, J.; Azapagic, A. Optimising Cascaded Utilisation of Wood Resources Considering Economic and Environmental Aspects. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2019, 124, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babaeinesami, A.; Ghasemi, P.; Chobar, A.P.; Sasouli, M.R.; Lajevardi, M. A New Wooden Supply Chain Model for Inventory Management Considering Environmental Pollution: A Genetic Algorithm. Found. Comput. Decis. Sci. 2022, 47, 383–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Tian, X. Research on Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Synergy in Forest Industry Based on High-Quality Development: A Case Study in Northeast China. Forests 2022, 13, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, S.; Ali, S.M.; Hasan, M.A.; Paul, S.K.; Kabir, G. Critical Success Factors for Supply Chain Sustainability in the Wood Industry: An Integrated PCA-ISM Model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Concu, G. Feasibility of a Local Production Chain for Structural Timber in Sardinia, Italy. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barmpoutis, P.; Kamperidou, V.; Stathaki, T. Forest Biomass Species Categorization and Evaluation of Their Condition and Quality Using Aerial Images. Pro Ligno 2019, 15, 314–320. [Google Scholar]
Reference | Reviewed Period | Purpose | Number of Articles | Characteristics |
---|---|---|---|---|
[14] | 1998 to 2018 | Forest management planning | 138 | Classifications and spatial organization of stands, Ecosystem goods and services, Decision-making environments. |
[15] | 1995 to 2017 | Wood forest products | 188 | Sustainability dimensions, Stakeholders Involvement, Model characteristics, Decision levels & Uncertainty. |
[16] | 2011 to 2018 | Sustainability | 830 | Plurality in sustainability and sustainable development. |
[17] | - | Forest and biomass supply chain | - | Data Analytics, Model characteristics, Economic Feasibility, Uncertainty. |
[18] | 2004 to 2019 | Forest bioeconomy | 66 | Type of physical flow in the value chain, Model characteristics, Solution method, Contribution, Case. |
[19] | 2011 to 2021 | Forest Supply chain | 45 | Technologies, Industry 4.0, Sustainability dimensions. |
[20] | 2000 to 2020 | Roundwood and Biomass Logistics | 138 | Truck transport and roads, Terminal concepts and terminal logistics, Storage of wood, Multimodal transport, Supply chain logistics. |
[21] | 1980 to 2020 | Sawmill industry | 133 | Planning problems, Model characteristics, Metaheuristics, Uncertainty, Simulation technologies, Digital twins |
Present review | 2018 to 2023 | Lumber forest products | 85 | Entities involvement, Sustainability dimensions, Metrics, Methodology, or Quantitative technique characteristics |
Criteria | Description |
---|---|
Language | English |
Publication year | Between 2018 and 2023 |
Publication Type | Peer-reviewed journal article |
Subject/content | Research related to the topic of sustainability and forest-to-lumber supply chain. Final products are based on lumber or solid wood, excluding publications using wood for energy or pulp. Research whose subject matter is methodological or quantitative techniques for decision-making. |
Metrics | Methodology or Technique | Region | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic | Environmental | Social | |||
NPV. | - | - | Forestry Management DSS (FMDSS) | Ireland | [37] |
Wood volume, Profitability, Productivity. | - | - | Evaluating the theoretical and technical potential of the roundwood supply | Mexico | [38] |
Costs | - | - | Linear programming model | Quebec, Canada | [39] |
Costs | - | - | Stochastic multistage mixed-integer model | Quebec, Canada | [40] |
Costs NPV | - | - | Linear programming model | Quebec, Canada | [41] |
Costs | - | - | Agent-based simulation model | Cévennes, France | [42] |
- | LCA GHG emissions Energy use | - | LCA | Tennessee, United States | [43] |
- | Carbon sequestration | - | Forestry Management DSS (wSADfLOR) | Portugal | [44] |
- | Carbon sequestration | - | Forestry simulation models | Lithuania | [45] |
Ecological security indexes | Econometric models and mathematical methods | China | [46] | ||
Illegal logging | Rural income | Semi-structured interviews, community meetings, and participant observation. | Amazonian, Peru | [47] | |
Costs | Selective logging | Integer linear programming model | Amazonian, Brazil | [48] | |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | Mixed and multiobjective integer linear programming models | Colorado, United States | [49] | |
Harvesting costs | Soil conservation Standing volume of wood | Two DSS, GIFT and SOILCONSWEB-GCI | Southern Italy | [50] | |
NPV | Carbon sequestration Water quality | Linear programming model | Ireland | [51] | |
Costs | Soil compaction | Stochastic programming model | Argentina | [52] | |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | Mixed linear programming model and multiobjective metaheuristic model | Colorado, United States | [53] | |
Cost, Operating efficiency | Water consumption, Waste, Use of recycled materials | Conceptual model for environmentally sustainable purchasing in the wood processing industry | Slovakia | [54] | |
Cost, Revenue, Profitability. | Carbon sequestration, Emission reduction, Waste | Multicriteria decision-making (MADM) methods, including TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) | Global | [55] | |
Forest benefits | Management activities, High conservation values, Environmental values and impacts | Compliance with laws, Workers’ rights, Conditions of employment, Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Community relations | Analysis hierarchical method (AHP) | Brazil, Spain, and Portugal | [56] |
NPV, Total harvest, Growth, Growing stock | Mature forest with a high share of broadleaves, Old forest, Large diameter trees, Fresh deadwood | Sparse forest, Clear-cut area, Mature forest | Scenario analysis, Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) | Sweden | [57] |
Volume of wood produced, Economic value of ecosystem services | Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity average | Recreation | Multiobjective linear programming models | Central Italy | [58] |
Financial incentives | Tree growth and health, Balance between wood production, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem services, Control of invasive species | Human perceptions of landscape change, Challenges of managing forests on longer-than-human time scales. | Semi-structured qualitative interviewing approach | Southeast England | [59] |
Value added, Costs | Fresh water consumption, Auxiliary waste of fossil origin, Cascade factor, Cumulative energy, Land use, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2, Green energies | Employment, Adequate remuneration, Prevention of accidents at work | Sustainability monitoring tool application (SUPPLY) | Central Germany | [60] |
Volume of wood harvested, Forest productivity, Growing stock | Sustainability of wood use, Biodiversity, Carbon sequestration, Gravitational risk protection | Recreational value. | Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) | Switzerland | [61] |
NPV, Economic return on investment, Costs, Wood harvesting | Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity, Soil protection, Water supply | Recreational value, Cultural value. | Simulation of forest development DSS of forest management ETCAP. | Turkey | [62] |
Cost, Productivity | Soil protection, Carbon sequestration, Ecosystem services, Biodiversity, Water regulation | Recreational value, Cultural Value | Geospatial logic model based on NetWeaver Developer | Catalonia, Spain | [63] |
NPV, Total volume of harvest | Biodiversity, Water quality | Recreation | Heureka DSS | Sweden | [64] |
Stocks of wood, Volume harvested | Soil protection, Water quality, Water use, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | Stakeholder and end-user participation, Co-design of tools with communities | S-DSS LANDSUPPORT web platform, MLFS (Machine Learning Forest Simulator) | Europe, Middle East, and Asia (10 countries) | [65] |
Cost, Roundwood production | Illegal Logging | Illegality risk | Forest Exploitation Authorization System (AUTEX) and the Digital DOF System | Brazil | [66] |
Metrics | Methodology or Technique | Region | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic | Environmental | Social | |||
Costs | - | - | Agent-based simulation model | European Alps | [67] |
- | Fuel consumption, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Dynamic linear programming | Finland | [68] |
- | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | LCA | Austria | [69] |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Discrete-event simulation model | Austria | [70] |
Costs | Energy consumption, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Geographic Information System | Oregon, United States | [71] |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Digitization of road network and applies a calibrated route finder (CRF) | Sweden | [72] |
Costs | Impacts to soil Impacts to water | - | Mixed integer programming model | Sweden | [73] |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Dynamic linear programming model | Finland | [74] |
Costs | Fuel consumption, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Linear programming modeling | Northern Spain | [75] |
Costs, Price of wood, Lead time | Emissions CO2, Emissions NOx, Particulate material | - | Discrete event simulation model | Austria | [76] |
Metrics | Methodology or Technique | Region | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic | Environmental | Social | |||
Cost | - | - | Simulation | Canada | [79] |
Profits | - | - | Mixed integer programming models (MIP) | British Columbia, Canada | [80] |
Costs | - | - | Linear programming model (PL) | Austria | [81] |
Costs | - | - | Mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) | Canada | [82] |
Volume transformed into money | - | - | Simulation | - | [83] |
Costs | - | - | Biomass uses the cascade principle and reverses the input method | Czech Republic | [84] |
Costs | - | - | Material Flow Analysis (MFA) | Landes de Gascogne, France | [85] |
Wood processing levels, Raw materials consumption | - | - | Binomial negative regression models | Malaysian Peninsula | [86] |
Costs | - | - | Binomial negative regression models | Carolina del Norte, United States | [87] |
Costs | - | - | Robust two-level facility location model and two-level integer programming model | - | [88] |
- | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | - | Qualitative research approach based on semi-structured in-depth interviews | Norway | [89] |
Profits | - | Employment rate, Unemployment rate. | Mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) with multiobjective formulation | Argentina | [90] |
Costs | Distance from industries, Water availability Air quality | Local employment, Population density | Analytic Hierarchy Methodology (AHP) Geographic Information Systems (GIS) | South Korea | [91] |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2 | Employment rate, Unemployment rate, Regional economic development | Mixed integer multiobjective nonlinear programming mathematical model (MINLP) | - | [92] |
Metrics | Methodology or Technique | Region | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic | Environmental | Social | |||
Costs | - | - | Mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) | Austria | [93] |
Cash inflow, Production cost, Sale price, Overall utility | - | - | Multicriteria decision-making analysis (MCDM) | Mexico | [94] |
- | Emissions of CFC, CO2, O3, SO2, and N. | - | LCA | Pacific Northwest United States | [95] |
Costs | Ozone depletion, GHG emissions Equivalent CO2, Human toxicity, Acidification | - | Multi-regional input-output analysis and LCA | Spain | [96] |
Costs | GHG emissions Equivalent CO2. | - | Multiobjective linear programming model | - | [97] |
Costs | Environmental effects and costs, Land cover, Distance from industries. | - | Linear programming model and metaheuristics Genetic Algorithm | - | [98] |
Costs | CO2 emissions, Water consumption. | Job creation. | Mixed integer linear programming model (MILP) and the Genetic Algorithm | China | [99] |
Costs, Profitability | Energy, Water, Biodiversity, Pollution | Health, Safety, Human rights, Community, Ethics | Success factor impact matrix, Interpretive structural modeling, Matrice impacts Croisés-Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement analysis | Bangladesh | [100] |
Costs | CO2 emissions, Waste recovery | Job creation. | Experimental methodology | Italy | [101] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mena-Reyes, J.F.; Vergara, F.; Linfati, R.; Escobar, J.W. Quantitative Techniques for Sustainable Decision Making in Forest-to-Lumber Supply Chain: A Systematic Review. Forests 2024, 15, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020297
Mena-Reyes JF, Vergara F, Linfati R, Escobar JW. Quantitative Techniques for Sustainable Decision Making in Forest-to-Lumber Supply Chain: A Systematic Review. Forests. 2024; 15(2):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020297
Chicago/Turabian StyleMena-Reyes, Jorge Félix, Francisco Vergara, Rodrigo Linfati, and John Willmer Escobar. 2024. "Quantitative Techniques for Sustainable Decision Making in Forest-to-Lumber Supply Chain: A Systematic Review" Forests 15, no. 2: 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020297
APA StyleMena-Reyes, J. F., Vergara, F., Linfati, R., & Escobar, J. W. (2024). Quantitative Techniques for Sustainable Decision Making in Forest-to-Lumber Supply Chain: A Systematic Review. Forests, 15(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020297