Next Article in Journal
Nomenclature Notes and Typification of Names in Dracaena (Asparagaceae, Nolinoideae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Highlighting a New Morphospecies within the Dialium Genus Using Leaves and Wood Traits
Previous Article in Journal
The Contributions of Soil Fauna to the Accumulation of Humic Substances during Litter Humification in Cold Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anatomical, Physical, Chemical, and Biological Durability Properties of Two Rattan Species of Different Diameter Classes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/f13081236
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Seasonal Variation on Leaf Cuticular Waxes’ Composition in the Mediterranean Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.)

by
Rita Simões
,
Isabel Miranda
* and
Helena Pereira
Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(8), 1236; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081236
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Diversity of Wood and Non-Wood Forest Products: Anatomical, Physical and Chemical Properties, and Potential Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Quercus suber L. (cork oak) leaves were analyzed along one annual cycle for cuticular wax content and chemical composition. This species, well adapted to the long dry summer conditions prevailing in the Mediterranean, has a leaf life span of about one year. The cuticular wax revealed a seasonal variation with a coverage increase from the newly expanded leaves (115.7 µg/cm2 in spring) to a maximum value in fully expanded leaves (235.6 µg/cm2 after summer). Triterpenoids dominated the wax composition throughout the leaf life cycle, corresponding in young leaves to 26 µg/cm2 (22.6% of the total wax) and 116.0 µg/cm2 (49% of the total wax) in mature leaves, with lupeol constituting about 70% of this fraction. The total aliphatic compounds increased from 39 µg/cm2 (young leaves) to 71 µg/cm2 (mature leaves) and then decreased to 22 µg/cm2 and slightly increased during the remaining period. The major aliphatic compounds were fatty acids, mostly with C16 (hexadecanoic acid) and C28 (octacosanoic acid) chain lengths. Since pentacyclic triterpenoids are located almost exclusively within the cutin matrix (intracuticular wax), the increase in the cyclic-to-acyclic component ratio after summer shows an extensive deposition of intracuticular waxes in association with the establishment of mechanical and thermal stability and of water barrier properties in the mature leaf cuticle.

1. Introduction

The plant cuticle is a continuous extracellular hydrophobic membrane that forms a primary barrier between the plant’s air-exposed surfaces and the external environment and also plays important functions in organ growth and development. Particularly in leaves, the cuticle plays a key role in limiting uncontrolled water loss and provides protection from biotic or abiotic stresses such as drought and high temperatures.
The cuticle is a heterogeneous membrane consisting of a matrix of polymeric cutin and cuticular waxes [1,2,3]. Cutin is a polyester formed by C16 and C18 hydroxy fatty acids and their derivatives and glycerol. Cuticular waxes predominantly comprise very long-chain fatty acids and their derivatives (including aldehydes, primary alcohols, and alkanes), as well as, in some species, cyclic molecules especially pentacyclic triterpenoids, sterols, and aromatics (e.g., Ficus elastica Roxb.) [1,2,3]. Cuticular waxes are distinguished according to their location in an intracuticular layer within the cutin matrix and an epicuticular layer deposited on the outer surface of the cutin [2].
The functional properties of the cuticle are largely related to the structural arrangement of the cuticular waxes’ layers and their chemical compositions [1,2,3]. The limitation of the non-stomatal water loss is one of the most important features and has therefore been analyzed in terms of both the role of intracuticular and epicuticular waxes and the role of the different cuticular wax components. The functional barrier against water diffusion through the cuticle is preferentially established by the intracuticular wax, while the epicuticular wax does not contribute to the transpiration barrier [4]. Regarding the contribution of the chemical wax components, it was shown that it is the very long-chain aliphatic fraction of the wax that establishes the transpiration barrier [1,2,5], whereas the triterpenoids provide mechanical and thermal stability to the plant cuticle [6,7]. For instance, the triterpenoids deposited within the cutin matrix restrict the polymer’s thermal expansion and thus prevent thermal damage to the highly ordered aliphatic wax barrier, even at high temperatures [7].
The cork oak (Quercus suber L.) is one of the most important evergreen species in the western Mediterranean Basin, with important economic value because of the production of cork that feeds a dedicated industrial chain [8]. This species is well-adapted to the adverse conditions of the Mediterranean, that is, to the long, dry summer conditions with high solar irradiances, air temperatures and vapor pressure deficit, and little or no precipitation, as well as moderately cold winters. The leaves are sclerophilic, oval in shape with a dark green color on the adaxial face and without epidermal hairs (trichomes), and the abaxial face is lighter with numerous stomata and densely covered with trichomes in the form of starry multicellular hairs [8,9]. The leaf’s cuticular membrane contains substantial amounts of cuticular wax (154.3–235.1 µg/cm2) composed largely of pentacyclic triterpenoid compounds (61%–72% of the identified compounds, with lupeol as the main component), while long-chain aliphatic components are mainly fatty acids (mainly in C30, C28, and C16) (17%–23% of the identified compounds) that contribute to building a nearly impermeable membrane [8]. Cutin is present in high amounts (518 μg/cm2 of leaf area) and has as major monomeric constituents 10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic and 9,10,18-trihydroxyoctadecanoic acids [10].
Cork oak has a specific foliage phenology, characterized by short-lived leaves that usually fall within one year concurrently with spring growth, with a cycle that is much shorter than that of other evergreen oaks, such as the Iberian holm oak (Quercus rotundifolia Lam.= Q. ilex L. subsp. ballota), whose leaves last 1–3 years, or the kermes oak (Q. coccifera L.), whose leaves can last 5–6 years [11,12,13]. In Q. suber, physiological activity starts in February/March with bud development and shoot growth, and the development of new foliage begins in April and is terminated by June. Most leaves emerge and expand within 1 month. The leaf life duration is approximately 14 months, with a range of 11–18 months [12,14,15]. Most of the older leaves (1-year-old) fall in spring during the early part of shoot growth [11].
The present work addresses the study of the seasonal variation of the chemical composition of cuticular waxes in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) leaves in the Mediterranean climate. It is hypothesized that the content and composition of the leaf cuticular waxes depend on the seasonally related leaf development stage and on the prevailing climatic variables. The results aim at understanding the role of cuticular wax components of sclerophilic leaves and their protective role regarding biotic and abiotic stresses in association with leaf development, thereby contributing to climate change adaptation measures.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling

The study was carried out on a provenance trial of 21-year-old Quercus suber L. trees at Herdade Monte Fava, Santiago do Cacém, in central Portugal (38°00′ N, 08°70′ W, altitude 79 m). This trial was established with seedlings of cork oak trees raised from seeds of different provenances: Portugal (PT35), Spain (ES11), Italy (IT13), France (FR3), Morocco (MA27), and Tunisia (TU32). A more detailed trial and site description is given in Sampaio et al. [16] and Varela [17]. The sampling included the collection of leaves from two trees from each of the six provenances. The first sampling was in May 2019 on fully expanded leaves from the current year’s spring flushing followed by samplings, in the same trees, in September 2019, December 2019, January 2020, and March 2020. The leaves were collected randomly from different branches on the south-exposed crown side, in the lower part of the canopy up to a height of approximately 2 m, making up a total sample per tree of about 100 leaves. A composite leaf sample per provenance was prepared with the leaves of the two trees.

2.2. Morphological Variables

The morphological variables leaf area and specific leaf area were measured in 40 leaves that were randomly selected from the leaves sampled for each provenance. Leaf area was measured by digitalizing and calculated with Leica Qwin vs. 3.0 Image Analysis Software. The leaves were oven-dried at 70 °C until no change in mass was detected, and the total dry mass per leaf was determined. Specific leaf area (SLA, cm2/g) was calculated as the ratio between the measured leaf area and the dry weight and used to describe the sclerophyllous nature of leaves.

2.3. Extraction of Cuticular Waxes

Cuticular wax was extracted from whole fresh leaves with dichloromethane over 6 h in a Soxhlet apparatus [9]. This extraction method yields a solution containing both the epicuticular and intracuticular waxes from both leaf sides. The amount of the soluble cuticular compounds was determined from the mass difference of the extracted leaves after drying at 105 °C and was expressed on a leaf surface area and dry weight basis (the ratio between wax in µg and the two-sided leaf surface area in cm2, obtained by digitalization) [9].

2.4. Cuticular Wax Composition

The cuticular wax, obtained as dichloromethane extracts, was analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Two milligrams of each leaf extract was taken and derivatized in 120 µL of pyridine; the compounds with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups were trimethylsilylated into trimethylsilyl (TMS) ethers and esters, respectively, by adding 80 µL of bis(trimethylsily)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and reacting at 60 °C for 30 min. The derivatized extracts (1 µL) were immediately analyzed by GC-MS (EMIS, Agilent 5973 MSD, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The detailed experimental conditions are given elsewhere [9]. The compounds were identified as TMS derivatives by matching with GC-MS spectral libraries (Wiley, NIST) and published fragmentation profiles [18,19]. Two replicates were made per extract.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the means ± standard deviation of the six independent provenances’ samples analyzed in duplicate. To compare data along the leaf cycle, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. Duncan’s post hoc tests were used to analyze pairwise differences between provenances. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the Sigmaplot® (Version 11.0, Systat Software, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

The seasonal changes in Q. suber leaves regarding leaf size, specific leaf area, and cuticular wax content and composition were followed throughout the first year, beginning with the newly expanded leaves in late spring (May) and ending with one-year-old leaves in the early spring (March) of the following year.

3.1. Leaf Area and SLA

In May, the newly developed leaves had a leaf size of 5.8 ± 1.7 cm2, which increased through summer to a maximum size of 6.5 ± 1.4 cm2 in September (corresponding to the fully expanded mature leaves) that remained unchanged throughout the winter months (6.5 ± 2.3 cm2 in December and 6.5 ± 1.4 cm2 in January). In March, when the 1-year-old leaves began to fall, the average leaf size decreased to 5.7 ± 1.7 cm2 (Figure 1). Although differences in leaf size occurred during the study period, they were not statistically significant (p = 0.449).
Specific leaf area (SLA), i.e., leaf surface per unit leaf dry mass, varied significantly throughout the study period (p < 0.001), with the values of May and January significantly different from those of September, December, and March (Figure 1). In May, the SLA of the young leaves was high (81.4 cm2/g) and declined with time to a mean value of 61.0 cm2/g, after the summer. SLA remained unchanged from September to December at a mean value of 63.2 cm2/g and increased in January (82.3 cm2/g). In March, the remaining one-year-old leaves were on average smaller, and the SLA was 61.1 cm2/g.

3.2. Cuticular Wax Content

Our results revealed a seasonal variation in total wax quantity deposited in the cuticle of the cork oak leaves (p < 0.001), with the May value significantly different from the other ones (Figure 2). In May, the newly developed leaves exhibited the lowest value of total wax coverage over the annual cycle (115.7 μg/cm2 on average, ranging between 68.9 and 172.5 μg/cm2). In the next three months—within June, July and August —and until September, the biosynthesis of leaf wax lipids was very dynamic, doubling up to 235.6 μg/cm2 (ranging from 173.7 to 267.4 μg/cm2). Wax content decreased afterwards to 182.1 μg/cm2 in December (ranging 151.0 and 208.0 μg/cm2). The cuticular wax content in January and March (193.6 μg/cm2 and 220.3 μg/cm2, respectively) increased, although not significantly, due to sample variation.

3.3. Cuticular Wax Composition

The seasonal changes in the composition of the leaf cuticular waxes grouped by major chemical families (µg/cm2) are presented in Figure 3. The composition and the relative abundances of individual components are shown in Table 1.
In the new expanding spring leaves in May, the cuticular wax was mainly composed of cyclic terpene compounds and linear long-chain aliphatic molecules. Pentacyclic triterpenoids were abundant, accounting for 26 µg/cm2 of the leaf wax coverage (22.6% of the total wax). The major component was lupeol (7.4% of all compounds, 32% of the triterpenic fraction), with β-amyrin (2.3% of all compounds) and betulin (2% of all compounds) as other important constituents. Sterols amounted to 14 µg/cm2 (12.2% of the wax), mainly β-systosterol (12.0% of the compounds). Aromatics comprised 8.7% of all compounds (10 µg/cm2), with hexadecy-(E)-p-coumarate as the major compound. The linear long aliphatic molecules of acids, alcohols, and alkanes together represented 39.1 µg/cm2 (33.9% of the total wax) and were the most abundant wax components. Fatty acids were the main compounds (17.3 µg/cm2, 15% of total wax), mostly C16 (hexadecanoic acid) and C28 (octacosanoic acid) fatty acids, which together accounted for 59% of the total fatty acids. The aliphatic alcohols contributed to 11.4 µg/cm2 of leaf surface coverage (12% of total wax), mostly C24 (tretracosan-1-ol), with 85% of total aliphatic alcohols. Alkanes accounted for 7.2% of the wax, with C29 (nonacosane, 4.8% of all compounds) and C30 (triacontane, 1.4%) as predominant molecular species.
After the summer, the cuticular wax on the mature leaves increased significantly, mainly by pentacylic triperpenes, which reached 116.0 µg/cm2 (49% of the total wax) (five times more than in spring leaves). Lupeol was the major constituent, followed by smaller amounts of epifriedelanol and friedelin. Pentacylic triterpenes were always the main wax components during the following months until the end of the annual cycle (March, with 12-month-old leaves), with a constant amount and composition (109.4 µg/cm2, 111.8 µg/cm2, and 106.3 µg/cm2, respectively, in December, January, and March). The statistical analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the time-related chemical composition in the amount of terpenes (Figure 3), with the May value different from the other ones.
Sterols were relatively constant over time (8% of the wax compounds in September and 5% in March) and composed exclusively of β-systosterol. Aromatic compounds were present in minor amounts.
Fatty acids showed the highest variability in concentration, with a maximum in September (75.6 µg/cm2, 17.1% of all compounds), decreasing to 28.7 µg/cm2 in December and slightly increasing during the remaining period. The statistical analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the amount of fatty acids (Figure 3), with the September value different from the other ones. Fatty acids were composed of a homologous series of even and saturated components from C16 to C30, mostly including octacosanoic (C28) and triacontanoic (C30) acids, followed by hexadecanoic (C16) acid.
The aliphatic alcohols, including mainly tretracosan-1-ol, were highest in spring but remained rather constant throughout the period.
n-Alkanes, including only nonacosane and triacontane, were highest in September (28.5 µg/cm2) and then decreased and remained relatively constant (between 13.6 and 17.0 µg/cm2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Leaf Area and SLA

In Q. suber, the shoot growth and the development of new foliage occur during the late spring and early summer, most likely reaching a maximum enlargement rate in summer (June/August) [11,20,21]. This was confirmed in the present study. The leaf size increased through summer to a maximum in September corresponding to the fully expanded mature leaves, which remained unchanged throughout the winter. The smaller leaf size measured in March is probably related to a canopy change related to leaf fall. In fact, the longevity of cork oak leaves is about one year, much shorter than other evergreen oaks; e.g., leaves last 1–3 years in Quercus rotundifolia and 5–6 years in Q. coccifera [13,14,22]. The leaf size measured in the present study matches the few available reports for mature Q. suber leaves. Mediavilla et al. [23] reported values between 5.5 ± 0.3 and 7.4 ± 0.5 cm2 in leaves taken from different orientations in the canopy, and Prats et al. [21] observed 7.1 ± 1.5 cm2 for full expanded leaves.
Specific leaf area (SLA) was the highest for the young leaves in May (Figure 1), when leaves were expanding and growing quickly, with the tree investing less in dry matter per leaf [24]. SLA declined after the summer as a result of the increase in leaf mass by the retention of the photosynthetic compounds produced during the late spring and early summer period, when the mature leaves were totally expanded. SLA changes resulting from leaf structure modification are an underlying mechanism facilitating acclimatization to a drought that increases with declining rainfall [25,26]. SLA increased in January when low temperatures limited photosynthesis and reflect the remobilization or loss of resources, namely, before leaf abcission [22]. In March, the remaining one-year-old leaves were on average smaller and maintained their loss of photosynthetic capacity. Photosynthetic activity has been shown to decrease with leaf age in other sclerophylls, and this strategy fits expectations for drought-tolerant species such as evergreen Mediterranean oaks [27].
The seasonal leaf variation in Q. suber was previously reported by Passarinho et al. [28] for three periods, spring to early summer, summer, and autumn–winter; the dry matter content of new leaves was low, increased with age to the maximum level in August/September, with SLA values of 85.0 ± 39 cm2/g (April–July), 74.4 ± 41 cm2/g (July–September), and 89.9 ± 37 cm2/g (September–February). The findings of the present study accord with these reported results.

4.2. Cuticular Wax Content

The occurrence of cuticular waxes in the leaves revealed a significant seasonal variation in total wax quantity, as expressed by the unit area of the leaf surface, as shown in Figure 2. The lowest value was found in May, in the newly developed cork oak leaves, suggesting that leaf growth was more efficient than the wax lipids biosynthesis during this spring period, when the environmental conditions are mild in terms of temperature and water availability, and therefore, the leaves did not require special protection. This changed drastically during the summer months, when biosynthesis of leaf wax lipids was very dynamic, doubling from May to September. This is in line with the need to provide efficient protection to minimize water loss through the cuticular layer when all stomata are closed due to the summer abiotic stress [24,29,30,31,32]. In fact, one of the leaf-related strategies that plants may adopt to cope with drought conditions is increasing wax accumulation on the leaf surface [33,34]. In winter, wax content decreased, likely because of natural wax erosion and evaporation due to environmental factors such as light, temperature, rain, and wind [29,31,35,36] and then increased slightly during the remaining period.There are no previous studies on the variation in the cuticular waxes along the development of Q. suber leaves, and the results reported here are the first for this species. They accord with the few available studies on leaves of several species that showed that the cuticular wax content in the early development stage is lower than that observed in mature leaves, reaching maximum values after full leaf expansion, e.g., on the leaves of Quercus robur L. [30], Fagus sylvatica L. [29], three Hosta genotypes (Hosta plantaginea (Lam) Asch., H. lancifolia Engl. and H. ‘Krossa Regal’) [31], Hedera helix L. [35], and Actinidia deliciosa (A.Chev.) C.F.Liang & A.R.Ferguson [36].
The importance of a steadily present continuous outer leaf coverage as a protective strategy is shown by the self-healing of voids in the epicuticular wax layer on living plants, which is a dynamic process, at least in the early stages of leaf development [37,38,39]. Wax regeneration after removing the original epicuticular wax layer by peeling with a water-based glue applied to the leaf surface was observed on young leaves of Prunus laurocerasus L. [40] and on leaves with different ages of diverse species [37,39,41].

4.3. Cuticular Wax Composition

To our knowledge, no previous studies have been made on the seasonal changes in the composition of the cuticular waxes of Q. suber leaves. In this work, we have found a clear compositional variation, namely between the young and the mature leaves, i.e., between May and September (Figure 3), regarding the proportion of each chemical family. The cuticular wax composition of the young leaves (Table 1) included terpenes, sterols, linear long aliphatics (fatty acids, alcohols, and alkanes), and aromatics representing a proportion in the wax of 22.6%, 12.2%, 33.9%, and 8.7%, respectively. After the summer, the cuticular wax on the mature leaves increased significantly, mainly by pentacylic triperpenes, which represented nearly half of the total wax and about five times more than in spring leaves. The proportion of the four wax chemical classes of terpenes, sterols, linear long aliphatics, and aromatics in the mature leaves was, respectively, 60.5%, 9.6%, 15.7%, and 1.9%. Within each chemical family, the composition did not vary over time (Table 1).
In general, the Q. suber cuticular wax compositions found in this study were similar to that previously identified in 1-year-old Q. suber mature leaves sampled in March showing predominantly pentacyclic triterpenoids (61%–72% of the identified compounds, mainly lupeol) and aliphatic compounds (17%–23% of the identified compounds, mainly fatty acids (C30, C28, and C16)) [9].
A similar wax composition is found in other oaks. For instance, Quercus coccifera leaf wax contains pentacyclic triterpenoids as the most abundant class (49% and 61%), with germanicol and lupeol as major constituents, and very-long-chain aliphatic compounds from C20 to C51 (25%–34%) with n-alkanes as the main class comprising a homologous series from C25 to C32 [42]. The cuticular wax composition from the adaxial surface of fully expanded olive tree leaves (Olea europaea L.) was also mainly composed of pentacyclic triterpenoids (83% of total wax, with oleanolic acid as the major triterpenoid) with a ratio between the very long chain acyclic and the cyclic wax of 0.04 with n-alkanes as the main compound class (3% of the total wax) of the long-chain aliphatic fraction [43]. A high proportion of pentacyclic triterpenoids is found in the leaf cuticles of desert plants, for instance, in Rhazya stricta Decne., for which pentacyclic triterpenoids make up 85.2% of the total cuticle wax, while long-chain aliphatics with chain lengths ranging from C20 to C33 represent only 3.4% with alkanes as the main class (2.5% of the total wax, 73.6% of the aliphatics) [7].
In the present study, the solubilized cuticular waxes were not differentiated into the epicuticular waxes, deposited on cutin, and the intracuticular waxes found within the cutin matrix, since the extraction method was aimed at the total removal of the lipophilic soluble components [9,10].
Recent studies revealed a substantial compositional gradient between the epicuticular wax and the intracuticular wax: while epicuticular wax is only composed of very-long-chain fatty acid derivatives (e.g., alkanes, primary alcohols, fatty acids), intracuticular wax is composed of alicyclic compounds (e.g., triterpenoids and steroids) and long-chain aliphatic molecules [4,44]. The wax compositional differences between the cork oak leaves throughout their development cycle may be linked to the proportional occurrence of epicuticular and intracuticular waxes over time, which can be estimated by analyzing the ratio between cyclic compounds and linear-chain compounds. In the young leaves from May, the pentacyclic triterpenoids (26 μg/cm2) in the wax mixture were less than aliphatic compounds (39 μg/cm2), with a cyclic-to-acyclic component ratio of 0.7, while in the mature leaves, this ratio was 1.6 in September, 3.8 in December, and 2.4 in March. Since the pentacyclic triterpenoids are located almost exclusively in the intracuticular wax compartment, the increase in the ratio after summer shows an extensive deposition of intracuticular waxes. This is in association with the establishment of mechanical and thermal stability given by the triterpenoids [6] and the water loss barrier in the mature leaf cuticle as given by the intracuticular waxes [7]; however, a natural effect of wax weathering with leaf age and with environmental factors was superimposed on the seasonal pattern of variation. This was detected by comparing the lowest ratio value from September with the highest value from December.

5. Conclusions

The seasonal dynamics of cuticular waxes in the cuticle of cork oak leaves were characterized for the first time, and the initial investigation hypothesis of an effect of seasonality on leaf wax coverage and composition was confirmed. There was an increase in wax coverage on the newly expanded leaves to a maximum value in the fully expanded leaves, and a decline after the summer as a result of the natural weathering of the cuticular waxes with leaf age and with environmental factors. A subsequent renewal of the external layer followed, thereby reflecting the importance of a steadily present continuous outer leaf coverage in such harsh climatic conditions. The leaf cuticular wax layer was mainly composed of cyclic terpene compounds and linear long-chain aliphatic molecules. Triterpenoids dominated the wax mixture throughout the leaf life cycle, with a high proportion of lupeol. In the very long-chain aliphatic wax fraction, fatty acids showed the highest concentration variability along the leaf-development cycle, with a decrease in autumn but an increasing trend in the next spring. The results on the chemical dynamics of the cuticular waxes along the leaf cycle support the role of the intracuticular layer and the long-chain lipids as a transpiration barrier during the summer drought in the Mediterranean climate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P. and I.M.; methodology, I.M. and R.S.; validation, H.P., I.M. and R.S.; experimental analysis, R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, H.P. and I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through funding from the Forest Research Centre (UIDB/00239/2020). Funding for this work was also provided by a doctoral scholarship from the FCT SUSFOR Doctoral Programme (PD/BD/128259/2016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Rita Simões acknowledges a doctoral scholarship from FCT with the SUSFOR Doctoral Programme (PD/BD/128259/2016). The cork oak provenance field trials were funded by the European Commission (FAIR1-CT-95-0202) and national programs (PBIC/AGR/2282/95, PAMAF 4027, PRAXIS/3/3.2/Flor/2110/95). We thank Ana Rodrigues for her technical assistance in field sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jetter, R.; Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Composition of plant cuticular waxes. In Biology of the Plant Puticle; Riederer, M., Müller, C., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, MS, USA, 2006; pp. 145–181. [Google Scholar]
  2. Buschhaus, C.; Jetter, R. Composition differences between epicuticular and intracuticular wax substructures: How do plants seal their epidermal surfaces? J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 841–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yeats, T.H.; Rose, J.K.C. The formation and function of plant cuticleds. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zeisler-Diehl, V.; Müller, Y.; Schreiber, L. Epicuticular wax on leaf cuticles does not establish the transpiration barrier, which is essentially formed by intracuticular wax. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 227, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Seufert, P.; Staiger, S.; Arand, K.; Bueno, A.; Burghardt, M.; Riederer, M. Building a barrier: The influence of different wax fractions on the water transpiration barrier of leaf cuticles. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 766602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsubaki, S.; Sugimura, K.; Teramoto, Y.; Yonemori, K.; Azuma, J.I. Cuticular membrane of Fuyu persimmon fruit is strengthened by triterpenoid nano-fillers. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Schuster, A.-C.; Burghardt, M.; Alfarhan, A.; Bueno, A.; Hedrich, R.; Leide, J.; Thomas, J.; Riederer, M. Effectiveness of cuticular transpiration barriers in a desert plant at controlling water loss at high temperatures. AoB Plants 2016, 8, plw027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pereira, H. Cork: Biology, Production and Uses; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simões, R.; Rodrigues, A.; Ferreira-Dias, S.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Chemical composition of cuticular waxes, pigments and morphology of leaves of Quercus suber trees from different provenances. Plants 2020, 9, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simões, R.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Chemical composition of leaf cutin in six Quercus suber provenances. Phytochemistry 2021, 181, 112570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, J.S.; Beyschlag, G.; Lange, O.L.; Beyschlag, W.; Tenhunen, J.D. Comparative phenology of four mediterranean shrub species growing in Portugal. In Plant Response to Stress; Tenhunen, J.D., Catarino, F.M., Lange, O.L., Oechel, W.C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; pp. 503–514. [Google Scholar]
  12. Escudero, A.; Del Arco, J.M.; Sanz, I.C.; Ayala, J. Effects of leaf longevity and retranslocation efficiency on the retention time of nutrients in the leaf biomass of different woody species. Oecologia 1992, 90, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pausas, J.G.; Pereira, J.S.; Aronson, J. The tree. In Cork Oak Woodlands on the Edge: Conservation, Adaptive Management, and Restoration; Aronson, J., Pereira, J.S., Pausas, J.G., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Oliveira, G.; Correia, O.; Martins-Loução, M.A.; Catarino, F. Phenological and growth patterns of the Mediterranean oak Quercus suber L. Trees 1994, 9, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fialho, C.; Lopes, F.; Perreira, H. The effect of cork removal on the radial growth and phenology of young cork oak trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 141, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sampaio, T.; Gonçalves, E.; Patrício, M.S.; Cota, T.M.; Almeida, M.H. Seed origin drives differences in survival and growth traits of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) populations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 448, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Varela, M.C. European Network for the Evaluation of Genetic Resources of Cork Oak for Appropriate Use in Breeding and Gene Conservation Strategies; INIA: Lisbon, Portugal, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kolattukudy, P.E.; Agrawal, V.P. Structure and composition of aliphatic constituents of potato tuber skin (suberin). Lipids 1974, 9, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ferreira, J.P.; Miranda, I.; Sen, A.; Pereira, H. Chemical and cellular features of virgin and reproduction cork from Quercus variabilis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grant, O.M.; Tronina, L.; Ramalho, J.C.; Besson, C.K.; Lobo-Do-Vale, R.; Pereira, J.S.; Jones, H.G.; Chaves, M.M. The impact of drought on leaf physiology of Quercus suber L. trees: Comparison of an extreme drought event with chronic rainfall reduction. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4361–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Prats, K.A.; Brodersen, C.R.; Ashton, M.S. Influence of dry season on Quercus suber L. leaf traits in the Iberian Peninsula. Am. J. Bot. 2019, 106, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garcia-Plazaola, J.I.; Faria, T.; Abadía, J.; Abadía, A.; Chaves, M.M.; Pereira, J.S. Seasonal changes in xanthophyll composition and photosynthesis of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) leaves under Mediterranean climate. J. Exp. Bot. 1997, 48, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mediavilla, S.; Martín, I.; Babiano, J.; Escudero, A. Foliar plasticity related to gradients of heat and drought stress across crown orientations in three Mediterranean Quercus species. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dwyer, J.M.; Hobbs, R.J.; Mayfield, M.M. Specific leaf area responses to environmental gradients through space and time. Ecology 2014, 95, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aranda, I.; Pardos, M.; Puértolas, J.; Jiménez, M.D.; Pardos, J.A. Water-use efficiency in cork oak (Quercus suber) is modified by the interaction of water and light availabilities. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gouveia, A.C.; Freitas, H. Modulation of leaf attributes and water use efficiency in Quercus suber along a rainfall gradient. Trees 2009, 23, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramírez-Valiente, J.A.; Sánchez-Gómez, D.; Aranda, I.; Valladares, F. Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in leaf ecophysiological traitsof 13 contrasting cork oak populations under different water availabilities. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Passarinho, J.A.P.; Lamosa, P.; Baeta, J.P.; Santos, H.; Ricardo, C.P.P. Annual changes in the concentration of minerals and organic compounds of Quercus suber leaves. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 127, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prasad, R.B.N.; Gülz, P.G. Surface structure and chemical composition of leaf waxes from Quercus robur L., Acer pseudoplatanus L. and JugIans regia L. Z. Naturforsch. C 1990, 45, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gülz, P.-G.; Müller, E. Seasonal variation in the composition of epicuticular waxes of Quercus robur leaves. Z. Naturforsch. C 1992, 47, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jenks, M.A.; Gaston, C.H.; Goodwin, M.S.; Keith, J.A.; Teusink, R.S. Seasonal variation in cuticular waxes on hosta genotypes differing in leaf surface glaucousness. HortScience 2002, 37, 637–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Fang, Y.; Xiong, L. General mechanisms of drought response and their applicationin drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, J.Y.; Broeckling, C.D.; Blancaflor, E.B.; Sledge, M.K.; Sumner, L.W.; Wang, Z.Y. Overexpression of WXP1, a putativeMedicago truncatula AP2 domain-containing transcription fac-tor gene, increases cuticular wax accumulation and enhancesdrought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant J. 2005, 42, 689–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cameron, K.D.; Teece, M.A.; Smart, L.B. Increased accumu- lation of cuticular wax and expression of lipid transfer protein in response to periodic drying events in leaves of tree tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hauke, V.; Schreiber, L. Ontogenetic and seasonal development of wax composition and cuticular transpiration of ivy (Hedera helix L.) sun and shade leaves. Planta 1998, 207, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Celano, G.; D’Auria, M.; Xiloyannis, C.; Mauriello, G.; Baldassarre, M. Composition and seasonal variation of soluble cuticular waxes in Actinidia deliciosa leaves. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Neinhuis, C.; Koch, K.; Barthlott, W. Movement and regeneration of epicuticlar waxes through plant cuticles. Planta 2001, 213, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Koch, K.; Neinhuis, C.; Ensikat, H.-J.; Barthlott, W. Self assembly of epicuticular waxes on living plant surfaces imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM). J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Koch, K.; Bhushan, B.; Ensikat, H.-J.; Barthlott, W. Self-healing of voids in the wax coating on plant surfaces. Philos. Trans. Royal Society A 2009, 367, 1673–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jetter, R.; Schäffer, S. Chemical composition of the Prunus laurocerasus leaf surface. dynamic changes of the epicuticular wax film during leaf development. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1725–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Huth, M.A.; Huth, A.; Koch, K. Morphological diversity of β-diketone wax tubules on Eucalyptus gunnii leaves and real time observation of self-healing of defects in the wax layer. Aust. J. Bot. 2018, 66, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bueno, A.; Sancho-Knapik, D.; Gil-Pelegrín, E.; Leide, J.; Peguero-Pina, J.J.; Burghardt, M.; Riederer, M. Cuticular wax coverage and its transpiration barrier properties in Quercus coccifera L. leaves: Does the environment matter? Tree Physiol. 2020, 40, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, H.; Burghardt, M.; Schuster, A.; Leide, J.; Lara, I.; Riederer, M. Chemical compositions and water permeabilities of fruit and leaf cuticles of Olea europaea L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8790–8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jetter, R.; Riederer, M. Localization of the transpiration barrier in the epi- and intracuticular waxes of eight plant species: Water transport resistances are associated with fatty acyl rather than alicyclic components. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Forests 13 01236 g001 550
Figure 1. Seasonal variation in specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf area in Quercus suber L. (mean and standard deviation).
Figure 1. Seasonal variation in specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf area in Quercus suber L. (mean and standard deviation).
Forests 13 01236 g001
Forests 13 01236 g002 550
Figure 2. Seasonal variation of cuticular wax (µg/cm2) in Quercus suber leaves (mean and standard deviation).
Figure 2. Seasonal variation of cuticular wax (µg/cm2) in Quercus suber leaves (mean and standard deviation).
Forests 13 01236 g002
Forests 13 01236 g003 550
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in the cuticular wax chemical families (µg/cm2) of Quercus suber leaves.
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in the cuticular wax chemical families (µg/cm2) of Quercus suber leaves.
Forests 13 01236 g003
Table
Table 1. Seasonal variation in the leaf cuticular waxes composition in cork oak (Quercus suber) (mean of six provenances), as determined by GC-MS, as a % of total peak area (only compounds with over 0.10% are shown).
Table 1. Seasonal variation in the leaf cuticular waxes composition in cork oak (Quercus suber) (mean of six provenances), as determined by GC-MS, as a % of total peak area (only compounds with over 0.10% are shown).
May 2019September 2019December 2019January 2020March 2020
Wax Content (µg/cm2)115.7 ± 52.6235.6 ± 33.6182.1 ± 31.6215.1 ± 48.5220.3 ± 56.0
n-Alkanes
Hexacosane (C26)-0.16 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.150.13 ± 0.050.15 ± 0.17
Heptacosane (C27)0.63 ± 0.241.06 ± 0.450.55 ± 0.450.68 ± 0.300.70 ± 0.17
Octacosane (C28)0.21 ± 0.070.72 ± 0.200.46 ± 0.120.60 ± 0.190.46 ± 0.14
Nonacosane (C29)4.75 ± 0.948.69 ± 3.387.23 ± 3.455.07 ± 2.615.24 ± 2.21
Triacontane (C30)1.43 ± 0.541.38 ± 0.320.84 ± 0.400.93 ± 0.401.13 ± 0.29
n-Alkanols
Hexadecan-1-ol (C16OH)0.10 ± 0.030.15 ± 0.050.14 ± 0.100.11 ± 0.090.12 ± 0.06
Docosan-1-ol (C22OH)0.89 ± 0.290.21 ± 0.100.12 ± 0.020.25 ± 0.100.18 ± 0.14
Tretracosan-1-ol (C24OH)9.92 ± 6.11.80 ± 0.891.14 ± 0.682.23 ± 1.051.84 ± 0.46
Pentacosan-1-ol (C25OH0.11 ± 0.07----
Hexacosan-1-ol (C26OH)0.35 ± 0.30----
Octacosn-1-ol (C28OH)---0.32 ± 0.220.25 ± 0.26
Dotriacontan-1-ol (C32OH)-0.11 ± 0.10---
Fatty acids
Saturated
Decanoic acid (C10:0)----0.21 ± 0.07
Dodecanoic acid (C12:0)0.10 ± 0.03--0.10 ± 0.070.22 ± 0.04
Tetradecanoic acid (C14:0)0.30 ± 0.160.12 ± 0.070.22 ± 0.110.15 ± 0.140.19 ± 0.23
Hexadecanoic acid (C16:0)4.97 ± 2.761.32 ± 0.654.31 ± 2.622.07 ± 0.602.02 ± 0.42
Octadecanoic acid (C18:0)0.51 ± 0.140.23 ± 0.090.17 ± 0.050.26 ± 0.140.20 ± 0.08
Eicosanoic acid (C20:0)0.20 ± 0.050.21 ± 0.11-0.18 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.08
Docosanoic acid (C22:0)0.32 ± 0.100.21 ± 0.17-0.26 ± 0.070.30 ± 0.17
Tetracosanoic acid (C24:0)0.80 ± 0.240.24 ± 0.15-0.24 ± 0.080.20 ± 0.17
Hexacosanoic acid (C26:0)0.71 ± 0.341.01 ± 0.43-0.56 ± 0.190.45 ± 0.16
Octacosanoic acid (C28:0)1.49 ± 1.094.65 ± 2.890.18 ± 0.091.46 ± 0.441.69 ± 0.36
Triacontanoic acid (C30:0)0.95 ± 1.018.15 ± 6.180.96 ± 0.742.28 ± 1.232.37 ± 0.61
Dotriacontanoic acid (C32:0)0.13 ± 0.090.41 ± 0.150.10 ± 0.70.32 ± 0.070.31 ± 0.12
Unsaturated
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (C18:2)1.42 ± 1.140.10 ± 0.05--0.15 ± 0.08
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid (C18:3)2.54 ± 2.190.26 ± 0.160.24 ± 0.120.17 ± 0.120.51 ± 0.14
Glycerides
Glycerol3.52 ± 1.320.12 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.070.33 ± 0.381.03 ± 0.39
4-Hydroxyphenylglycolic acid0.19 ± 0.210.35 ± 0.401.01 ± 0.451.18 ± 0.71-
2-Palmitoglycerol0.63 ± 0.090.21 ± 0.10-0.21 ± 0.26-.
Glycerol monostearate0.17 ± 0.07----
1-Monolinoleate Glycerol0.33 ±0.15----
Linolenoylglycerol0.13 ± 0.07---0.18 ± 0.12
Sterols
β-Systosterol11.94 ± 5.286.29 ± 1.869.64 ± 4.264.01 ± 1.114.91 ± 1.03
Terpenes
Diterpenes
Phytol4.00 ± 2.400.61 ± 0.280.35 ± 0.390.49 ± 0.361.01 ±0.23
Pentacylic triperpenes
α-Amyrin1.61 ± 0.531.34 ± 0.400.72 ± 0.470.76 ± 0.290.64 ± 0.21
β-Amyrin2.33 ± 0.953.98 ± 1.384.90 ± 2.743.50 ± 1.323.97 ± 1.25
Germanicol0.27 ± 0.428.16 ± 1.698.10 ± 6.508.40 ± 2.476.38 ± 1.49
Lupeol7.38 ± 5.7128.20 ± 10.4136.59 ± 11.1327.75 ± 7.0624.11 ± 6.81
Epifriedelanol0.43 ± 0.322.38 ± 2.263.75 ± 3.251.92 ± 2.223.12 ± 2.38
Erythrodiol0.21 ± 0.17-0.14 ± 0.121.62 ± 1.270.39 ± 0.30
Friedelin1.14 ±0.962.47 ± 2.732.82 ± 2.822.16 ± 2.002.38 ±1.85
Betulin0.40 ± 1.090.36 ± 0.100.80 ± 0.631.09 ± 0.811.46 ± 0.71
Betulinic acid0.46 ± 0.250.42 ± 0.150.75 ± 0.63-0.98 ± 0.381.21 ± 0.53
Ursolic acid0.44 ± 0.160.27 ± 0.100.24 ± 0.190.27 ± 0.160.28 ± 0.15
Aromatic compounds
Benzoic acid0.33 ± 0.290.16 ± 0.070.33 ± 0.090.27 ± 0.050.36 ± 0.06
Hexadecy-(E)-p-coumarate4.93 ± 2.87-0.20 ± 0.09--
Vanillin acid0.47 ± 0.170.11 ± 0.060.11 ± 0.060.40 ± 0.490.16 ± 0.15
4-(Hydroxymethyl)phenol0.66 ± 0.310.10 ± 0.080.51 ± 0.54-1.36 ± 0.24
Other compounds
Myo-inositol1.35 ± 0.990.34 ± 0.180.10 ± 0.091.35 ± 2.311.18 ±1.27
D-Fructose0.67 ± 0.200.32 ± 0.09-3.31 ± 2.801.04 ±1.36
α-Tocopherol1.62 ±1.11---1.04 ± 1.36
β-Tocopherol0.33 ± 0.130.95 ± 0.50---
γ-Tocopherol--0.55 ± 0.62--
α-Tocopherolquinone0.19 ± 0.170.13 ± 0.100.10 ± 0.160.40 ± 0.462.05 ± 2.1
Erythrono-1,4-lactone0.33 ± 0.14--0.37 ± 0.22-
Ribonic acid, 1,4-lactone0.33 ± 0.130.10 ± 0.06-0.51 ± 0.340.31 ± 0.22
Quinic acid---1.93 ± 0.76-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simões, R.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Effect of Seasonal Variation on Leaf Cuticular Waxes’ Composition in the Mediterranean Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.). Forests 2022, 13, 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081236

AMA Style

Simões R, Miranda I, Pereira H. Effect of Seasonal Variation on Leaf Cuticular Waxes’ Composition in the Mediterranean Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.). Forests. 2022; 13(8):1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simões, Rita, Isabel Miranda, and Helena Pereira. 2022. "Effect of Seasonal Variation on Leaf Cuticular Waxes’ Composition in the Mediterranean Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.)" Forests 13, no. 8: 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop