Next Article in Journal
The Potential of Low-Cost 3D Imaging Technologies for Forestry Applications: Setting a Research Agenda for Low-Cost Remote Sensing Inventory Tasks
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Urbanization Intensity on the Distribution of Black Carbon in Urban Surface Soil in South China
Previous Article in Journal
Forest Structure and Composition Are Critical to Hurricane Mortality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Scion Variety on the Phosphorus Efficiency of Grafted Camellia oleifera Seedlings

1
College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
2
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for the Protection and Restoration of Forest Ecosystem in Poyang Lake Basin, Nanchang 330045, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(2), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020203
Submission received: 17 December 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2022 / Accepted: 25 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Chemistry and Biochemistry in Forests)

Abstract

:
Grafting provides a way to improve tolerance to low phosphorus (P) stress for plants, and has been extensively applied in commercial cultivars grafted onto appropriate rootstocks. However, little literature is available concerning the scion-mediated effect on P efficiency in grafted plants. In this study, three different Camellia oleifera Abel. scion cultivars (G8, G83-1, and W2) were grafted onto the same rootstock (W2) under controls (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) availability for eight months. The results showed that the scions significantly affected root-to-shoot weight ratios, the root morphology with a diameter larger than 1 mm, P accumulation, and the P utilization efficiency (PUE) of the root. A higher increase in the root-to-shoot weight ratio under the low-P supply was observed in the G83-1/W2 (26.15%) than in the G8/W2 (0%) and the W2/W2 (5.32%). Root PUE of the scion G8, G83-1, and W2 was improved by up to 113.73%, 45.46%, and 20.97% under the low-P supply. Moreover, G8/W2 exhibited higher shoot P accumulation and the highest root PUE under the low-P supply, indicating a high capability to tolerate P deficiency by maximizing the cost-effectiveness of P remobilization to photosynthetic organs. This suggested the vigorous variety of G8 could be a promising scion to improve grafted C. oleifera tolerance to low-P stress. Our results would have important implications for exploration and identification of a superior scion variety to enhance the ability of resistance concerning P deficiency stress in C. oleifera.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus (P), as an important component of macromolecular substances, which include nucleic acid and the cytomembrane, is intimately involved in plant growth and development [1,2]. Even when soil total P is relatively high, only 10–25% is available for plants owing to P’s immobilization in soil [3,4]. Accordingly, P deficiency has become a primary factor limiting agriculture. Application of P fertilizers is required to improve and maintain crop yields worldwide, but only 10–20% of applied P fertilizer is directly utilized by plants [5,6,7]. The remaining P fertilizer is wasted and ultimately results in the loss of resources and surface water P pollution. As such, balancing the relationship between the amount of applied P fertilizer and P utilization of plants has been gaining extensive attention among policymakers and plant scientists.
Differences in the ability of plants to acquire P exist among different species or varieties within a single species [8,9,10]. Genetic improvement of P efficiency in plants, as achieved through the breeding of P-efficient cultivars, has been utilized to optimize plant production under lower fertilizer use conditions [11,12,13]. In many plants, rootstocks are widely employed to promote the P use efficiency of scion cultivars [14,15]. This is possible through rootstocks with high P efficiency being able to uptake more ions by efficient root morphologies and root architectures [16,17]. The selection of P-efficient rootstocks has been conducted in various species [18,19]. However, the P efficiency of grafted plants is both rootstock and scion dependent. Most of the available information on the P efficiency of plants has been obtained through experiments with rootstocks, while the P use of scions and P transportation between rootstocks and scions have been under-examined [20,21]. For example, the P efficiency of different scions grafted onto the same rootstock has not been reported yet.
The tea-oil camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) is an important woody edible-oil species cultivated in East Asia [22,23]. Tea-seed oil extracted from the seeds of this plant is well known as a healthy cooking oil owing to its high contents of unsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, and vitamins [24]. In China, this species has been cultivated for over 2300 years. The cultivation areas were more than 4.5 million ha in 2020. C. oleifera is often planted in the hilly areas and low mountains of South China [22]. Owing to heavy rain leaching and adsorption of aluminum phosphate, the soil found in extensive areas of South China is characterized by P deficiency, which severely limits the growth and productivity of tea-oil cultivation [25,26].
Nurse seedling grafting is a primary way of propagating C. oleifera cultivars, in which semi-woody branches (scions) are joined to young seedling rootstocks without leaves. Because of high cell division activity between scions and rootstocks of the grafted plants with good compatibility, the young shoot tissue can enhance the survival probability of the grafted plant, and this technique is extensively applied in many camellia species [17]. There have been some studies focusing on the underlying physiological mechanisms determining the healing process and signaling pathways of the union formation process of C. oleifera [27,28]; however, our knowledge of whether the grafting alters the tolerance to abiotic stress in C. oleifera remains poor and somewhat fragmented. Additionally, some varieties with random rootstocks that influence the root development in grafted C. oleifera plants have been reported [29]. However, the effects of different vigorous scion varieties grated on the same rootstock on biomass allocation and strategies of P uptake and utilization under low-P stress have yet been estimated.
In this study, we evaluated the response of three different C. oleifera scions grafted onto the same rootstock cultivar under controls and low-P conditions (0.5 mM and 0 mM, respectively). The current research focused on the following: (1) Scion-mediated and P availability impact on the biomass allocation; (2) scion-mediated and P availability impact on root morphology in different diameter classes; (3) scion-mediated and P availability impact on P accumulation and P utilization efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

This experiment used three C. oleifera cultivars (‘Ganwu 2’, ‘Gan 8’, and ‘Ganshi 83-1’) as the scions, which had obvious different morphology and had relatively greater planting areas in Jiangxi Province, eastern China. For example, ‘Gan 8’ (G8) has a greater crown and leaf area ratio [30]. ‘Ganshi 83-1’ (G83-1) has greater biomass [31]. ‘Ganwu 2’ (W2) has a relatively greater seedling height [32], of which seedlings were used as the rootstock in this experiment. In November, large, plump, and shiny seeds (W2) were collected from the C. oleifera germplasm bank in Jiangxi province, and stored outdoors in wet river sands until the following May. After germinating, the resulting plants were employed as rootstocks (Figure 1a). Robust half-lignified branches (W2, G8, and G83-1) were picked from the cutting orchard and used as scions for cleft grafting (Figure 1b). The nurse seedling grafting procedure for C. oleifera followed the methods of Feng et al. [32]. A total of three grafting combinations were generated, including W2 self-grafted (W2/W2) and two scion genotypes grafted onto W2 (G8/W2 and G83-1/W2).

2.2. Experimental Design

All seedlings were planted in a seedbed fertilized with farmyard manure and covered by a sun shelter. Because of high cell division activity for C. oleifera [32], all nurse grafting unions in this experiment almost survived. There were no significant differences in the affinity found among the three combinations. Until the next spring (January), uniformly growing plants were selected and transplanted into plastic containers (diameter and depth of 20.5 cm and 17.0 cm, respectively). In total, 36 grafting plants were transplanted. Each container filled with river sand contained one plant. The camellia seedlings were first rinsed with tap water for one month and then modified Hoagland nutrient solution. In this study, we employed 0.5 mM as the control condition, recognized as the optimum P availability for C. oleifera [33]. Owing to high adaptation in acidic red soils with P deficiency of wild C. oleifera trees, extremely low P (0 mM) was employed as deficient P in the experiment duration. The concentrations of the other macro- and micro-nutrient solution were: 2.0 mM Ca(NO3)2, 2.0 mM KNO3, 1.0 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM (NH4)2SO4, 50 μM H3BO3, 50 μM Fe-EDTA, 15 μM ZnSO4, 2.0 μM CuSO4, and 50 μM MnSO4. KH2PO4 was used as the P source. There were six treatments, with three grafted combinations (W2/W2, G8/W2, and G83-1/W2), two P levels (0.5 mM, 0 mM), and six replicates with one grafting plant for each treatment. Every ten days, 200 mL of the corresponding nutrient solutions was replenished. All experiments were conducted in a greenhouse at the Science and Technology Park of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China (28°45′ N, 115°49′ E).

2.3. Determination of Biomass and Tissue Phosphorus Concentration

Eight months after starting low-P treatment, the whole plants were harvested and separated into different tissues (Figure 1e). Shoots and roots were oven-dried to weigh the shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW). Total P contents were determined by the molybdenum antimony anti-colorimetric method [20]. P uptake efficiency was estimated as the total P accumulated in the plant. P accumulation and P utilization efficiency (PUE) were calculated as follows [33,34]:
P   accumulation   ( mg ) = P   concentration   ( mg / g )   ×   dry   weight   ( g )  
PUE   ( g / mg ) = dry   weight ( g ) / P   accumulation   ( mg )

2.4. Root Morphology

After cleaning using running water, the whole roots were dispersed in a transparent acrylic container over the Expression 10000XL 3.49 scanner (Epson Telford Ltd. Telford, UK) and scanned (Figure 1d). WinRHIZO (Pro2012b) software (Regent Instruments Company, Quebec, Canada) was employed to evaluate root length, root surface area, and root volume.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to explore the influence of scion cultivars, P availability, and their interaction among different grafted plants using SPSS 25.0. Throughout all figures, ***, **, and * indicate significance at the p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.01, and p ≤ 0.05 thresholds, respectively, while ‘ns’ indicates p > 0.05. The one-way ANOVA was used to determine any statistically significant differences between the control and low P conditions. The comparison was carried out using Duncan multiple range test at α = 0.05%.

3. Results

3.1. Scions Affected the Dry Weight of Grafted C. oleifera

We evaluated the shoot dry weight (SDW) and the root dry weight (RDW) among grafted C. oleifera with different scions on the same rootstocks under control and low-P availability. The results showed that the RDWs were not altered among different scions of grafted C. oleifera in either treatment (Figure 2a). However, the SDWs were significantly affected by the use of scion cultivars and the interaction between scion cultivar and P availability (Figure 2b). Considering total DW (TDW) for the whole plant, the grafted unions of G8/W2 and G83-1/W2 performed better than that of the self-grafted plants (W2/W2) under control conditions (Figure 2c). Furthermore, TDW of G8/W2 was enhanced by up to 22.7% compared with the G83-1/W2 under the low-P supply, but no significant differences were found between G8/W2 and G83-1/W2 under control conditions. Moreover, the RDW of G8 and G83-1 scion cultivars were higher compared with the self-grafted (W2/W2) under controls and the low-P supply (Figure 2a). The ratio of root to shoot was affected by the use of different scion cultivars, P availability, and their interaction (Figure 2d). The root-to-shoot ratio of G83-1/W2 under low P supply was significantly increased compared to controls; it was up to 26.15% higher than that of G8/W2 (0%) and W2/W2 (5.32%).

3.2. Scions Affected Root Morphology of Grafted C. oleifera

In this work, several root morphological indexes on different classes of root diameters were utilized to determine which scion cultivars, the P availability, and their interactions would influence the grafted C. oleifera plants. The results showed that scion cultivars significantly affected the total root surface area and root volume, but did not influence the total root length (Figure 3). On the other hand, scion impact on the root length with a root diameter larger than 1 mm was detected for grafted C. oleifera seedlings (Table 1). However, the root length with a root diameter less than 1 mm (accounting for 79.8% of the total root length), which were observably higher than the rest of the root diameter classes (Figure 3a), was not significantly affected by nutrient treatment and scion varieties (Table 1). Furthermore, the root volume with a root diameter larger than 3 mm, accounting for 64.2% of the total root volume, exceeded the total root volume of the remaining diameter classes (Figure 3c).
The total root length, root surface area, and root volume for three scion cultivars of grafted plants under low-P supply were lower compared to controls (Figure 3). No significant differences in the root morphological parameters were detected among any combinations at any root diameter classes under low-P supply. Only the root length and root surface area (larger than 3 mm in a root diameter) of G8/W2 and/or G83-1/W2 were higher than that of the self-grafted plants (W2/W2) under low-P supply (Figure 3a,b). However, there were obvious differences in root surface area and root volume among three grafting combinations at all root diameter classes under control conditions (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 3). Moreover, different scions grafted onto W2 rootstock (including G8/W2 and G83-1/W2) under controls showed the greater potential of the root growth in comparison with the self-grafted plants (Figure 3). Interestingly, the scion G8 had the highest root surface area and root volume (larger than 3 mm in diameter) under controls (p ≤ 0.05) and achieved relatively great performance on root length and root surface area (less than 1 mm in a diameter) even under the low-P supply (Figure 3).

3.3. Scions Affected P Accumulation and P Utilization Efficiency (PUE) of the Root of Grafted C. oleifera

The root P accumulation was apparently affected by scion cultivars and P availability (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 2). P accumulation of G8/W2 and G83-1/W2 combinations in the root under low-P supply were apparently decreased compared to under controls, while no similar result was detected in grated W2/W2 plants. The percentage of P accumulation in the root was much lower in G8/W2 (23.08%) than in grafted plants G83-1/W2 (52.59%) under low-P conditions. Scion varieties significantly affected the shoot P accumulation under low-P supply, while no expectations were found under controls. Low-P treatments also decreased the P accumulation in the shoots of G8/W2 and G83-1/W2. However, the decreases of shoot P accumulation imposed by the P deficiency were smaller in G8/W2 (24.64%) than in grafted plants G83-1/W2 (56.55%).
The root PUE and the shoot PUE were significantly affected by scion cultivars, P availability, and their integration (p ≤ 0.001) (Figure 4a). Compared with the plants grown under control conditions, low-P treatment significantly increased the PUE of the root, shoot, and whole plant of all grafting C. oleifera plants regardless of scion genotypes (Figure 4c). The increases of the root PUE imposed by the reduced P supply were higher in G8/W2 (113.73%) than in W2/W2 (20.97%) and G83-1/W2 (45.46%), while there was no significant difference in shoot PUE under the low-P supply.

4. Discussion

To improve plant adaptation to a range of stress, grafting scion varieties onto rootstocks is extensively employed for many woody economic species [35,36]. A great deal of research has been conducted on rootstock-induced changes in scion vigor [37,38,39], but there has been a lack of literature that has examined the influence of scion genotypes on biomass allocation and root development in grafted plants, especially under nutrient limitation. A previous study reported variety differences in spatial distribution and monthly dynamics of fine roots for five different cultivars of C. oleifera using the minirhizotron technique [29]. However, they used the random rootstocks and also did not investigate the effect of P nutrient availability. This work found that the scion genotypes and P availability could affect the dry weights allocations, root morphology, root P accumulations, and root PUE among three different scion cultivars grafted onto the same C. oleifera rootstock.
Plant biomass allocation is generally influenced by nutrient availability, developmental stage, and genotype [40]. In the present study, the genetic variability among scions largely explained differences in the dry weights and allocation biomass of the aboveground organ among the grafted C. oleifera seedlings (Figure 2). The total DW of G8/W2 grafted plants performed better under two treatment conditions than the other grafted combinations (Figure 2c), indicating that G8 was a vigorous scion with relatively higher photochemical efficiency and higher dry weight. Wang et al. [41] reported that the C. oleifera scion cultivars of G8 had a relatively greater crown and leaf area. The RDW/SDW of G83-1/W2 under low P supply was higher compared to controls (Figure 2d), and no similar results were found in the other grafting unions, suggesting that scion cultivar G83-1 was sensitive to low P stress. The SDW of G83-1/W2 was lower (Figure 2b) and the root P accumulation was higher under the low-P level (Table 2), indicating that low P may restrict the shoot growth and promote P transfer from the leaves to the roots for scion cultivars G83-1.
Root development can be determined by the intrinsic genetic program of the rootstock and nutrient conditions in the external environment. In this study, we found that the scion genotypes also strongly impacted the root length (larger than 1 mm in diameter), root surface area, and root volume of the same rootstocks in different grafted C. oleifera combinations (Figure 3 and Table 1). Furthermore, the root growth of G8/W2 and G83-1/W2 under controls performed better than that of the self-grafted plants (Figure 3). These effects may have resulted from differences in the ability of the grafted plants to transport carbon supply from the shoot, which could thus determine root carbon acquisition and control root development [42,43]. Previous studies reported that coarse roots (larger than 3 mm in a diameter) could affect water and nutrient transport capacity [44,45]. In the current study, the scion cultivar of G8 with high SDW as a vigorous scion performed better on root surface area and root volume of coarse roots than that of the other grafted C. oleifera under controls (p ≤ 0.05), suggesting vigorous scion can promote the growth of roots and enhance plants’ ability to absorb P.
Fine roots (less than 1 mm in diameter), as a better indicator of root response to the nutrients in the soil [46,47], accounted for 79.8% of the total root length in this study (Figure 3a). However, no significant differences in root length were detected among fine roots (less than 1.0 mm in diameter) under both controls and low-P treatments (Figure 3a). Furthermore, no significant effect on root morphology was detected among combinations at the low-P supply, with a few exceptions (Figure 3). Because of the presence of P mainly in the upper layers of soil and decreasing with depth, root growth can be enhanced under P deficiency, especially with respect to the fine roots [48,49,50,51]. However, no effects were found in the current study, perhaps owing to our sampling only once for the whole experiment. Moreover, since nutrients and water were added regularly during the treatment, it was unlikely that differences in fine roots (less than 1 mm in diameter) resulted in different shoot performance and P uptake, especially for woody species. Similar results were detected in tomato roots under low P availability [21].
When facing nutrient stress, more efficient plants/genotypes have evolved underlying strategies allowing them to get access to obtain sufficient amounts of the nutrient (nutrient accumulation) and/or improve efficiency utilizing quantities (nutrient utilization efficiency) of the existing nutrients [52,53]. The scion variety of G8 significantly improved shoot P accumulation (Table 2) and root PUE under the low-P supply (Figure 4a). These results indicate that the higher tolerance of G8 to P deficiency was owing to a higher root PUE and a higher accumulation to transfer more P to the shoot. The capability to recycle P from non-photosynthetic organs like roots to upper shoots can maximize the cost-effectiveness of P remobilization to tolerate P deficiency [54]. However, the more P sensitive scion G83-1 grafted onto W2 showed higher P accumulation in the root and lower PUE in the shoot (Table 2 and Figure 2), which may affect the tolerance to the low-P stress.

5. Conclusions

This work comprised a comprehensive study of the scion-mediated effect on the root growth and strategies of nutrient uptake and utilization in grafted Camellia oleifera Abel. seedlings under low phosphorus (P) treatments. The more vigorous scion variety of ‘Gan 8’ with higher shoot dry weights can improve grafting plants’ tolerance to the low-P supply, which appeared to result from a greater ability to take up P and translocate it to the shoot. Therefore, our results suggested ‘Gan 8’ as promising scions for farmers under low-P supply for grafted C. oleifera plants.

Author Contributions

J.Z., L.L. and A.X. conducted the research work and collected the data. J.Z. and J.L. analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. L.Z., W.Z. and X.G. revised the manuscript. D.H. designed and supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000603), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760223), Second Batch of Forestry Science and Technology Innovation Special Project (2019) No.23.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data reported in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors. The data are not publicly available yet due to the authors are writing some other papers by mining these data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vance, C.P.; Uhde-Stone, D. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol. 2003, 157, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Merbach, W.; Deubel, A.; Gransee, A.; Ruppel, A.S. Phosphorus solubilization in the rhizosphere and its possible importance to determine phosphate plant availability in soil. A review with main emphasis on German results. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2010, 56, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hibbard, L.P. Estimation of plant available phosphate in soil. Soil Sci. 1933, 35, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuchenbuch, R.O.; Buczko, U. Re-visiting potassium- and phosphate-fertilizer responses in field experiments and soil-test interpretations by means of data mining. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc. 2011, 174, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holford, C.R.I. Soil phosphorus: Its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Soil Res. 1997, 35, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martinefsky, M.J.; Assuero, S.G.; Mollier, A.S.; Pellerin, S. Analysis of the response of two tall fescue cultivars of different origin to P deficiency. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 69, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fita, A.; Nuez, F.; Picó, B. Diversity in root architecture and response to P deficiency in seedlings of Cucumis melo L. Euphytica. 2011, 181, 323–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mundim, G.B.; Viana, J.M.S.; Maia, C. Early evaluation of popcorn inbred lines for phosphorus use efficiency. Plant Breed. 2013, 132, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nava, G.; Ciotta, M.N.; Brunetto, G. ‘Fuji’ apple tree response to phosphorus fertilization. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2017, 39, 17369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bonou-gbo, Z.; Djedatin, G.; Dansi, A.; Tamo, M. Screening of 134 maize genotypes collected in Benin for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency. Int. J. Curr. Res. Biosci. Plant Biol. 2017, 4, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.; Yan, H.L.; Zhang, S.X. Differences of rhizosphere characteristics of two P-efficient wheat genotypes on two calcareous soils. Soil Fertil. Sci. China 2009, 4, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng, Y.Y.; He, J.; Jin, Y.; Li, F.M. High Phosphorus acquisition and allocation strategy is associated with soybean seed yield under water- and P-limited conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Camilo, S.; Odindo, A.O.; Kondwakwenda, A.; Sibiya, J. Root traits related with drought and phosphorus tolerance in common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, Z.Q.; Zang, X.L.; Sun, L.L.; Zhai, H. Comparison of phosphorus efficiency on different rootstocks and their grafted seedlings with cabernet sauvignon. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2014, 41, 1289–1296. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhou, X.; Jia, Z.M.; Wang, D.B. Effects of limited phosphorus supply on growth, root morphology and phosphorus uptake in citrus rootstocks seedlings. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Serra, I.; Strever, A.; Myburgh, P.A.; Deloire, A. Review: The interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine R. 2014, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nawaz, M.A.; Imtiaz, M.; Kong, Q.; Cheng, F.; Ahmed, W.; Huang, Y.; Bie, Z. Grafting: A technique to modify ion accumulation in horticultural crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gautier, A.T.; Merlin, I.; Doumas, P.; Cochetel, N.; Cookson, S.J. Identifying roles of the scion and the rootstock in regulating plant development and functioning under different phosphorus supplies in grapevine. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 185, 104405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ollat, N.; Peccoux, A.; Papura, D.; Esmenjaud, D.; Marguerit, E.; Tandonnet, J.P.; Bordenave, L.; Cookson, S.J.; Barrieu, F.; Rossdeutsch, L.; et al. Rootstocks as a Component of Adaptation to Environment; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 68–108. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zambrosi, F.C.B.; Mattos, D.; Quaggio, J.A.; Cantarella, H.; Boaretto, R.M. Phosphorus uptake by young citrus trees in low-P soil depends on rootstock varieties and nutrient management. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 2013, 44, 2107–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martínez-Andújar, C.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Dodd, I.C.; Albacete, A.; Pérez-Alfocea, F. Hormonal and nutritional features in contrasting rootstock-mediated tomato growth under low-phosphorus nutrition. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tu, J.; Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; Ai, W.; Chen, L. Plantation quality assessment of Camellia oleifera in mid-subtropical China. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 186, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qu, X.; Zhou, J.; Masabni, J.; Yuan, J. Phosphorus relieves aluminum toxicity in oil tea seedlings by regulating the metabolic profiling in the roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 152, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xie, Y.; Wang, X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis identifies genes responsible for fruit count and oil yield in the oil tea plant Camellia chekiangoleosa. Sci. Rep. UK 2018, 8, 6637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. He, G.; He, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Hu, X.; Hu, X.; Wu, J.; Wu, J. Effect of aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency on the growth and photosynthesis of oil tea (Camellia oleifera Abel.) seedlings in acidic red soils. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, J.; Tan, X.; Yuan, D.; Zhang, X.; Ye, S.; Zhou, J. Effect of phosphates on the growth, photosynthesis, and P content of oil tea in acidic red soils. J. Sustain. Forest. 2013, 32, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z.J.; Feng, J.L.; Chen, H. Anatomical study on healing process of grafting port of Camellia oleifera seedling stock. Plant. Sci. J. 2013, 31, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, J.L.; Chen, H.; Chen, S.P.; Lin, W.J.; Yang, Z.J. Relationship between graft healing and endogenous hormones in Camellia oleifera seedling stock. J. Forest Environ. 2018, 38, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, J.P.; Liu, G.; You, L.; Yu, S.Q.; Lian, L.N.; Wang, H.K.; Yan, M.; Hu, D.N. Temporal and spatial distribution dynamics of fine roots of different Camellia oleifera varieties. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 3927–3933. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng, L.M.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D.N.; Wu, N.S.; Huang, H.N. Evaluation on fruit characters of 10 clonesof young Camellia oleifera group gan. Study on phenotypic variation and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of young trees of Gan Camellia oleifera clone. Jiangxi Agric. Univ. 2011, 33, 0906–0910. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zuo, J.L.; Xing, W.N.; Lei, X.L.; Liu, S.; Yi, W.H.; Zhou, W.C.; Gong, C.; Ao, W.C.; Xu, L.C. Growth performance of one year old Camellia oleifera clones. Eco. For. R. 2009, 27, 77–80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Feng, J.; Yang, Z.; Chen, S.; El-Kassaby, Y.A.; Chen, H. Signaling pathway in development of Camellia oleifera nurse seedling grafting union. Trees 2017, 31, 1543–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chen, L.S.; Chen, Y.Z.; Yang, X.H.; Tang, L.T.; Wang, R.; Wang, X.N.; Peng, S.F. Effects of low phosphorus stress on the growth and nutrient utilization efficiency of different Camellia oleifera clones. J. Nanjing Univ. 2014, 38, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yuan, H.; Jing, L.; Hua, B.; Liu, Z.; Bie, Z. Grafting onto different rootstocks as a means to improve watermelon tolerance to low potassium stress. Sci. Hortic-Amst. 2013, 149, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tandonnet, J.P.; Cooksoon, S.J.; Vivin, P.; Ollat, N. Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine R. 2010, 16, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kodur, S.; Tisdall, J.M.; Tang, C.; Walker, R.R. Accumulation of potassium in grapevine rootstocks (Vitus) as affected by dry matter partitioning, root traits and transpiration. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, W.; Zhao, X.; Liang, N.; He, L.; Yu, L.; Zhan, Y. Phosphorus deficiency promotes the lateral root growth of Fraxinus mandshurica seedlings. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sc. 2019, 182, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schwarz, D.; Öztekin, G.B.; Tüzel, Y.; Brückner, B.; Krumbein, A. Rootstocks can enhance tomato growth and quality characteristics at low potassium supply. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2013, 149, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhen, A.; Bie, Z.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, Q. Effects of scion and rootstock genotypes on the anti-oxidant defense systems of grafted cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 56, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, M.; Bie, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, H. Genotypic variation for potassium efficiency in wild and domesticated watermelons under ample and limited potassium supply. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc. 2013, 176, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, C.T.; Hu, D.N.; You, L.; Zhong, L.S.; Shen, J.; Luo, H.D.; Meng, F.H.; Wang, X.X. Variation analysis of growth characters of 19 Camellia oleifera strains in Ganmao series. J. Jiangxi Agric. Univ. 2016, 38, 905–912. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruhl, E.H. Uptake and distribution of potassium by grapevine rootstocks and its implication for grape juice pH of scion varieties. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1989, 29, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, W. Systemic long-distance signaling and communication between rootstock and scion in grafted vegetables. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Domenicano, S.; Coll, L.; Messier, C.; Berninger, F. Nitrogen forms affect root structure and water uptake in the hybrid poplar. New Forest. 2011, 42, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Doi, R.; Tanikawa, T.; Miyatani, K.; Hirano, Y. Intraspecific variation in morphological traits of root branch orders in Chamaecyparis obtusa. Plant Soil 2017, 416, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, H.; Zhao, J.; Gong, L. The morphological and chemical properties of fine roots respond to nitrogen addition in a temperate Schrenk’s spruce (Picea schrenkiana) forest. Sci. Rep. UK 2021, 11, 3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thomas, S.C.; Martin, A.R. Carbon Content of Tree Tissues: A Synthesis. Forests 2012, 3, 332–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zeng, F.; Chen, X.; Huang, B.; Chi, G. Distribution changes of phosphorus in soil–plant systems of larch plantations across the chronosequence. Forests 2018, 9, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ahmed, H.M.A.; Versiani, M.A.; De-Deus, G.; Dummer, P.M.H. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Placido, D.F.; Sandhu, J.; Sato, S.J.; Nersesian, N.; Quach, T.; Clemente, T.E.; Staswick, P.E.; Walia, H. The lateral root density gene regulates root growth during water stress in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1955–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ying, L.; Peng, L.; Lie, X.; Kuxia, Y.; Wen, W. High heterogeneity of root carbon allocation affects root turnover rate and production of bothriochloa ischaemum under drought stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 226–239. [Google Scholar]
  52. Dissanayaka, D.; Plaxton, W.C.; Hans, L.; Meike, S.; Buddhi, M.W.; Jun, W. Molecular mechanisms underpinning phosphorus-use efficiency in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1483–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hafsi, C.; Atia, A.; Lakhdar, A.; Debez, A.; Abdelly, C. Differential responses in potassium absorption and use efficiencies in the halophytes Catapodium rigidum and Hordeum maritimum to various potassium concentrations in the medium. Plant Prod. Sci. 2011, 14, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dunlop, J.B.; Tomkins, B. Chapter 13-Genotypic differences in potassium translocation in ryegrass. Transp. Transf. Process Plants 1976, 221, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. C. oleifera nurse seedling grafting and the root morphology. (a) Rootstock; (b) Scion; (c) Grafted combination; (d) Root morphology for the grafted C. oleifera; (e) Grafted C. oleifera seedlings with two years.
Figure 1. C. oleifera nurse seedling grafting and the root morphology. (a) Rootstock; (b) Scion; (c) Grafted combination; (d) Root morphology for the grafted C. oleifera; (e) Grafted C. oleifera seedlings with two years.
Forests 13 00203 g001
Figure 2. Root dry weight (RDW) (a), shoot dry weight (SDW) (b), total DW (TDW) (c), and root-to-shoot ratio (RDW/SDW) (d) of the scions (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicated significant differences among grafted combination under controls and the low-P supply treatments, respectively. * and ** in the figure legend indicated significant effect of Scion, P, and their interaction at level of p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively. ns, no significant different between treatments. * on the bar indicated significant differences between control and low-P treated plants (α = 0.05%).
Figure 2. Root dry weight (RDW) (a), shoot dry weight (SDW) (b), total DW (TDW) (c), and root-to-shoot ratio (RDW/SDW) (d) of the scions (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicated significant differences among grafted combination under controls and the low-P supply treatments, respectively. * and ** in the figure legend indicated significant effect of Scion, P, and their interaction at level of p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively. ns, no significant different between treatments. * on the bar indicated significant differences between control and low-P treated plants (α = 0.05%).
Forests 13 00203 g002
Figure 3. Root length (a), root surface area (b), root volume (c) of the scion (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicate significant differences among grafted combination under controls and the low-P supply treatments, respectively (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Root length (a), root surface area (b), root volume (c) of the scion (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicate significant differences among grafted combination under controls and the low-P supply treatments, respectively (p ≤ 0.05).
Forests 13 00203 g003
Figure 4. Root P utilization efficiency (Root PUE) (a), shoot P utilization efficiency (Shoot PUE) (b), and P utilization efficiency (PUE) (c) of the scions (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicate significant differences among the grafted combination under controls and low-P supply treatments, respectively. * on the bar indicated significant differences between control and low-P treated plants according to the one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05%). ** and *** in the figure legend indicated significant effect of Scion, P, and their interaction at level of p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. ns, no significant different between treatments.
Figure 4. Root P utilization efficiency (Root PUE) (a), shoot P utilization efficiency (Shoot PUE) (b), and P utilization efficiency (PUE) (c) of the scions (W2, G8, and G83-1) grafted onto W2 rootstock under control (0.5 mM) and low-P (0 mM) conditions during eight months. Lowercase and uppercase indicate significant differences among the grafted combination under controls and low-P supply treatments, respectively. * on the bar indicated significant differences between control and low-P treated plants according to the one-way ANOVA test (α = 0.05%). ** and *** in the figure legend indicated significant effect of Scion, P, and their interaction at level of p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively. ns, no significant different between treatments.
Forests 13 00203 g004
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA on the effects of scion cultivars, P availability, and their interaction on root length, root surface area, and root volume (p-values) for roots of diameters (d) ≤1 mm, 1 to 3 mm, and >3 mm (ns, nonsignificant).
Table 1. Two-way ANOVA on the effects of scion cultivars, P availability, and their interaction on root length, root surface area, and root volume (p-values) for roots of diameters (d) ≤1 mm, 1 to 3 mm, and >3 mm (ns, nonsignificant).
Root Diameter (mm)FactorRoot LengthRoot Surface AreaRoot Volume
Total rootsScionns<0.01<0.05
Phosphorusnsnsns
Scion × Phosphorusnsnsns
d ≤ 1Scionns<0.05<0.05
Phosphorusnsnsns
Scion × Phosphorusnsnsns
1 < d ≤ 3Scion<0.001<0.001<0.001
Phosphorus<0.01<0.01<0.01
Scion × Phosphorusnsnsns
d > 3Scion<0.01<0.01<0.01
Phosphorus<0.01<0.05ns
Scion × Phosphorusnsnsns
Table 2. Effects of scion cultivars, P availability and their interaction on P accumulation and P uptake efficiency.
Table 2. Effects of scion cultivars, P availability and their interaction on P accumulation and P uptake efficiency.
Scion/RootstockP AvailabilityRoot P AccumulationShoot P AccumulationPlant P Uptake EfficiencyRoot P Accumulation/Plant P Uptake Efficiency
mMmgmgmg%
W2/W2Control3.30 ± 0.46 B6.70 ± 2.07 A10.00 ± 3.92 B33.00
Low-P2.98 ± 0.36 ab5.74 ± 1.36 ab8.72 ± 2.36 a34.17
G8/W2Control5.03 ± 0.20 AB *9.82 ± 1.44 A14.85 ± 1.44 AB *33.87
Low-P2.22 ± 0.36 b7.40 ± 1.68 a9.62 ± 2.10 a23.08
G83-1/W2Control7.76 ± 0.55 A *8.86 ± 2.96 A *16.62 ± 3.00 A *46.69
Low-P4.27 ± 0.88 a3.85 ± 2.2 b8.12 ± 2.61 a52.59
Significance
Scion (S) ****ns
Phosphorus (P) *******
S × P nsnsns
The values represent the means ± standard error. *, **, and *** denote p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. Lowercase and uppercase indicate significant differences among grafted combination under controls and the low-P supply treatments, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). * indicates significant differences between control and low-P treated plants (α = 0.05%).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, J.; Liu, J.; Lian, L.; Xu, A.; Guo, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Hu, D. Effects of Scion Variety on the Phosphorus Efficiency of Grafted Camellia oleifera Seedlings. Forests 2022, 13, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020203

AMA Style

Zeng J, Liu J, Lian L, Xu A, Guo X, Zhang L, Zhang W, Hu D. Effects of Scion Variety on the Phosphorus Efficiency of Grafted Camellia oleifera Seedlings. Forests. 2022; 13(2):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Jin, Juan Liu, Lunan Lian, Aowen Xu, Xiaomin Guo, Ling Zhang, Wenyuan Zhang, and Dongnan Hu. 2022. "Effects of Scion Variety on the Phosphorus Efficiency of Grafted Camellia oleifera Seedlings" Forests 13, no. 2: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop