Next Article in Journal
Simulating the Impacts of Drought and Warming in Summer and Autumn on the Productivity of Subtropical Coniferous Forests
Previous Article in Journal
Growth Rhythm Analysis of Young Stand and Selection of Superior Families in Choerospondias axillaris
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arthrinium arundinis, a Novel Causal Agent of Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Culm Rhomboid Rot and Its Sensitivity to Fungicides
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Volumetric Spore Traps Are a Viable Alternative Tool for Estimating Heterobasidion Infection Risk

Forests 2022, 13(12), 2146; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122146
by László Benedek Dálya 1, Miloň Dvořák 1,* and Petr Sedlák 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2146; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122146
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection and Analysis of Forest Pathogens)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript provides information about the use of automatic volumetric spore trapping providing an accurate method to detect Heterobasidion. Experiments were done in combination to a passive method quantifying how much Heterobasidion is located in a forest stand. As expected the automatic volumetric spore trapping was more sensitive and the authors recommend this method of detection. The manuscript is well written and there are just a few suggestions listed below to improve the paper. However, one major question needs to be discussed and explained. Heterobasidion species produce asexual spores. The production of these spores is not mentioned in the introduction or discussion. Although the ability of the asexual spores to cause infection may be debated, these airborne spores are being collected by the automated spore traps and their DNA is contributing to the amount of Heterobasidion detected. This raises questions about the threshold of spores needed for stump infection. With DNA from asexual Heterobasidion spores being collected, it is providing an inaccurate analyses of the number of basidiospores collected and the spore load present that causes infection. As the authors indicate on line 93, lots of conidiophores of Heterobasidion are produced and seen on the wood discs used for passive spore detection.

 

Line 15 – why are they distinct?

Lines 26-30 Asexual spores are also being detected by spore traps? Information is needed on these spores in the paper since the automatic volumetric spore traps collect them as well as basidiospores.

Line 71 – why use distinct?

Line 83 – How long was exposure?

The following recent papers using an automative rotary arm spore collector for Heterobasidion detection have been published and may be useful in the discussion:

Bérubé, J.A.; Potvin, A.; Stewart, D. Importance of local and long-distance Heterobasidion irreugulare aerial basidiospore dispersal for future infection centres in thinned red pine plantation in Quebec. For. Chron. 2017, 93, 241–245.

Bérubé, J.A.; Dubé, J.; Potvin, A. Incidence of Heterobasidion irregulare aerial basidiospores at different locations in southern Quebec. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 40, 34–38.

Otto, E., B. Held, S. Redford and R. A. Blanchette. 2021. "Detecting Heterobasidion irregulare in Minnesota and Assessment of Indigenous Fungi on Pines" Forests 12, no. 1: 57. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/1/57

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

we would like to thank you for very valuable suggestions. All were included in the current version of the manuscript.

We hope you will be satisfied.

With best regards

MD

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

thank you for your comments and ecaluation, we provide the replies to your suggestions in the attached file. We hope we have explained our point of view sufficiently.

With best regards

MD

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop