Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Harvesting Methods on Aboveground Nutrient Pools of Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Forest in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of the Combined Charring and Coating Treatments as a Wood Surface Protection Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Ecological Vulnerability in the Red Soil Erosion Area of Changting under Continuous Ecological Restoration: Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evolution and Prediction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

n-Heptadecane-Impregnated Wood as a Potential Material for Energy-Saving Buildings

Forests 2022, 13(12), 2137; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122137
by Ahmet Can 1,2,* and Jure Žigon 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2137; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122137
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall this manuscript is written well, however, If the author adds more results on energy storage will be preferred. this is because this paper aims at energy storage. DSC and TGA are not sufficient

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions on our manuscript.

Please fint attached our answers and the revised version of the manuscript.

Best regrads.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The resolution of Figure 1 needs to be further improved and I think that a comparison of the three samples in a single figure would give a more intuitive view of the changes in functional groups.

2、The characterization test of X-ray diffraction can be implemented to study the crystallization of crystals before and after modification.

3. The authors have not designed the experiments in such a way that the microstructure of the samples can be analyzed. I believe that scanning electron microscopy tests are necessary, and that SEM can be used to microscopically observe the morphology and structure of the samples before and after impregnation and before and after fungal infestation, which would further corroborate the authors' statements.

4. The design of the experiments is lacking, and the required characterization and tests are missing to corroborate the results obtained.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions on our manuscript.

Please find attached our answers and the revised version of the manuscript. 

Best regrads.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attachment. Thanks.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions on our manuscript.

Please find attached our answers and the revised version of the manuscript.

Best regrads.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I agree with the scientific publication.

Back to TopTop