Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Long-Term Fertilisation of Potato Starch Wastewater on the Growth of Scots Pines: A Retrospective Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Construction of a Core Collection of Germplasms from Chinese Fir Seed Orchards
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Biochar Application Pyrolyzed at Different Temperatures on Soil Properties, Growth and Leaf Secondary Metabolite Accumulation in Cyclocarya paliurus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dendroclimatological Analysis of Chinese Fir Using a Long-Term Provenance Trial in Southern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation of Fertility and Phenological Synchronization in Cunninghamia lanceolata Seed Orchard: Implications for Seed Production

1
Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Forestry Engineering on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River & National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River & Rainy Area of West China Plantation Ecosystem Permanent Scientific Research Base, Institute of Ecology & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Hongya State-Owned Forest Farm, Meishan 620300, China
3
Experimental Center of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Xinyu 336600, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(10), 1571; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101571
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 18 September 2022 / Accepted: 22 September 2022 / Published: 26 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Long-Term Genetic Improvement and Molecular Breeding of Chinese Fir)

Abstract

:
Reproductive synchronicity between parents influences the seed production and quality in seed orchards. Our objective was to determine clonal variation in fertility and phenological synchronization, as well as their effect on seed production, in a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) open-pollinated seed orchard. Significant variation of female fertility and male phenological synchronization occurred in the clones. The flowering of the male was 2 days earlier than the female. The gamete contribution of female and male were unbalanced between clones (the phenological synchronization indexes (POij) were 0.000–0.585 (as female) vs. 0.000–0.385 (as male)). In general, the average POij value of as a male was lower than as a female, but the number of male flowers were significantly higher than female, indicating that the management of female flowers should be enhanced. The average POij of self-pollination was 0.298, higher than cross-pollination (0.236), indicating that there was a larger probability to selfing in the orchard. The middle phenological type possessed higher phenological synchronization indexes than early and late phenological type. Genetic control was stronger for number of female flowers (H2 = 0.277) than for male and female initial stages and flower duration (H2 = 0.193–0.239). We found a positive correlation between POij and TSW (r = 0.756), SOsc (r = 0.612), and Cp (r = 0.337), suggesting the phenological synchronization determined the seed quality and yield. Comprehensively, this study provided fertility and phenology information for management of a Chinese fir seed orchard, as well as a reference for the establishment of advanced seed orchards of conifer trees.

1. Introduction

Seed orchards, which consist of populations with excellent clones or families of economically important trees, are established to produce seeds with high genetic quality [1,2,3]. Higher genetic gains in seed orchards are expected without pollen from unimproved trees, full synchrony, and random mating between clones [4,5]. Therefore, flowering phenology and synchronization and fertility variation are important considerations in the genetic management of seed orchards [6].
Studies on fertility variation are the basis for seed orchard management and for parent selection in advanced-generation seed orchards [7]. The imbalance of gamete contributions in seed orchards affects the genetic composition of the progeny, which can lead to a reduction in genetic diversity [8,9,10,11]. In seed orchards, knowledge about variation in fertility is important for genetic management [8,12]. There are tremendous differences in fertility variation among different tree species, and most previous studies showed that most variation in fertility in forest tree populations (sibling coefficient, Ψ) among trees ranged from 1.00 to 41.67 [13,14]. Great differences in male and female strobilus production has been shown to cause fertility variation between clones in many seed orchards, such as those of Pinus densiflora, P. thunbergia, and P. koraiensis [15]. Knowledge of fertility variation is preferred for parental management in seed orchards because of parental management is relatively easy, is inexpensive, and is not survey intensive [3,16]. Fecundity determines the proportion of female or male gamete contributions and ultimately affects genetic gain. Consequently, on the basis of the results of fertility variation among clones in seed orchards, knowledge of fertility variation can help optimize the genetic compositions of the gamete pool to improve genetic gains, such as thinning or replanting.
Genetic exchange among trees and the genetic composition of progeny in seed orchards are substantially influenced by the flower phenology of trees [15,17]. Complete phenology synchronization among parents is needed to achieve the expected overall genetic gain in seed orchards [18]. Weak synchronization between female receptiveness and pollen dispersal decreases the effective population size, leading to an unbalanced contribution of clones, an unbalanced overall selfing proportion, and an increased risk of contamination in seed orchards [2,18,19]. Data from many studies of seed orchards suggest that asynchronization is a serious problem in seed production (Sp) [2,20,21,22]. For example, the low degree of flowering synchronization between clones indicated great potential for selection and optimization in a Schima superba seed orchard [23]. In a P. patula seed orchard, the overlap of flowering between clones in a seed orchard and natural forest stands was shown to cause pollen contamination [2]. Knowledge of synchronization is considered basic information for pollen management in seed orchards and advanced-generation seed orchard establishment [24]. Therefore, understanding the phenology and synchronization could enable optimization of the configuration of parents, thereby increasing the overall level of outcrossing in seed orchards.
Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) is an important, fast-growing timber tree species used for afforestation in southern China [25]. To date, the phenology and pollen distribution in first-generation seed orchards and flowering synchronization between elite trees have been studied comprehensively [9,20,26,27]. Chen et al. (1995) investigated the reproductive phenology of first-generation Chinese fir seed orchards in Guizhou Province and reported that the average synchronization index was very low (0.30–0.37). The current clonal Chinese fir seed orchards were established early and have provided seeds for afforestation, but low Sp and quality still occur in some of the seed orchards. Flowering phenology is influenced by physical factors (e.g., insolation, exposure within seed orchards, and temperature), and plantation establishment of and parental combinations in seed orchards also affect flowering synchronization. Therefore, further quantification of fertility variation and phenological synchronization are fundamental information for seed orchard management to obtain high Sp and quality and are referenced for the establishment of advanced-stage seed orchards. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to (1) determine the fertility variation in seed orchards via flowering data, (2) determine the degree of phenology synchronization, and (3) discuss the effects of fertility and synchronization variation on seed production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Investigated Seed Orchard

A second-generation clonal seed orchard (CSO) of Chinese fir at the Hongya state-owned forest farm in Sichuan, China (29.70° N, 103.26° E; 960–1200 m above sea level), was selected as the survey and study plot. The CSO was established in 2003 through grafting, and the plots were established in accordance with a completely randomized block design, with an isolation belt of Cryptomeria fortunei artificially planted trees. The orchard covers an area of 8.7 ha, with 110 clones in a 3 × 4 m row spacing, and the distance between ramets of the same clone is 20 m; there are 30–66 ramets per clone (mean = 48, median = 41), which were randomly arranged in the blocks. The CSO consists of 12 blocks, and each subline contains all 110 clones, with a mean of 5.3 ± 0.5 ramets per clone. Eighty-seven clones (3–4 ramets per clone, for a total of 305 ramets) were selected for the survey. These 87 clones were selected from seven provenance sites in Sichuan and Chongqing provinces, China: the Yuejiang forest farm (14 clones), Xuyong forest farm (21 clones), Nanchuan forest farm (19 clones), Junlian forest farm (14 clones), Hongya state-own forest farm (7 clones), Fushun forest farm (9 clones), and Gongxian seed orchard (3 clones) (Table 1). Four branches from the four cardinal directions per tree were marked for the flowering surveys, phenological data collection, and seed surveys.

2.2. Flowering Survey

The production of strobili was investigated by the standard branch method [9]. Four standard branches (lateral branches facing the eastern, southern, western, and northern directions) per individual tree were marked. The number of male (Nm) and female flowers (Nf) on a standard branch were recorded.

2.3. Phenological Data Collection

The phenological progress of male and female strobili was monitored on four marked branches at flowering time (approximately from March to April). These data were recorded every two days (7 March–2 April 2020). The male and female flowers were divided into four stages [9]. The stages of the male flowers were as follows: 1, initial stage (ISf, staminate strobilus whitening with little pollen shedding); 2, peak stage (PSf, a large amount of pollen shedding); 3, final stage (FSf, 90% of pollen has shed); and 4, end stage (ESf, 100% of pollen has shed, and the staminate strobilus has browned). The stages of the female flowers were as follows: 1, initial stage (ISm, female flower bud is yellow, with invisible ovules; 2, peak stage (PSm, at least two whorls of ovuliferous scales expanding, while the ovule is golden yellow with droplets); 3, final stage (FSm, ovule no longer fresh, with little droplets); and 4, end stage (ESm, ovuliferous scales completely closing). The days until male and female flowering of each clone were also recorded as the flowering duration of males (FDm) and females (FDf), respectively. Julian dates for every stage were recorded for each tree.
The individuals were divided into three types (early, middle, and late) by the beginning of pollen shedding and female receptivity [20]. Early individuals began shedding pollen (M_E) or were receptive (F_E) within 2 days before the earliest individuals, late individuals began shedding pollen (M_L) or were receptive (F_L) within 2 days after the latest individuals, and all other individuals were classified as “middle” in terms of the timing of their pollen shedding (M_M) and receptivity (F_M).

2.4. Evaluation of Seed Production

Cones were removed by hand from the marked branches. Then, the cone production (Cp) of each marked branch was investigated, and the Cp of each tree was calculated. Then, the cones were dried, and all cones from each tree were randomly selected to measure the seed production (Sp, g) and seed output of a single cone (SOsc, g). The thousand-seed weight (TSW, g) per tree was also measured.

2.5. Data Analysis

The variance of fertility, phenology, and production were calculated according to the general linear model (GLM) procedure by SPSS software according to the following statistical model [28]. “Clone” was nested within “Provenance” for all analyses of variance (ANOVAs):
Y i j = μ + P i + δ i j + e i j
where Y i j is the fertility, phenology, or production of clone j; μ is the overall mean; Pi is the effect of provenance; δ i j is the effect of the clone in which the clone is nested in the provenance; and e i j k represents the random error.
The clonal broad-sense heritability ( H c 2 ) for fertility (flower production), phenology, and seed traits was calculated as follows [29]:
H c 2 = σ c 2 σ t o t a l 2
where σ c 2 is the estimate of variance for clones and σ t o t a l 2 is the total estimate of the variance, which includes both genetic and environmental variance.
The coefficients of variation (CVf for the female strobilus; CVm for the male strobilus) were calculated and applied to estimate the fertility variation. The variation in female (ψf) and male fertility (ψm) among individuals was estimated as follows [15]:
ψ f = C V f 2 + 1
ψ m = C V m 2 + 1
The correlation between female and male strobilus production (r) was analyzed via Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The sibling coefficient (ψ), which is derived from combined fertility variation, is calculated by the following formula if there is a significant correlation between female and male strobilus production [30].
ψ = 0.25 ψ f + ψ m + 0.5 1 + r × ψ f 1 ψ m 1
If no correlation is detected between female and male strobilus production, the ψ value is calculated as follows [16]:
ψ = 0.25 ψ f + ψ m + 0.5
The parameters of effective number of parents (Np) in the seed orchard is calculated as Np = n/ψ, where n is the total number of ramets in the seed orchard (the same as below). Similarly, the effective number of female (Npf = n/ψf) and male gametic parents (Npm = n/ψm), the relative effective number of parents (Nr = Np/n), and the relative effective numbers of female (Nrf = Npf /n) and male parents (Nrm = Npm /n) were also calculated [31,32,33]. A parent–balance curve was used to estimate the female and male gametic contributions. The trees were ranked from high to low according to their female and male strobilus production, and then the cumulative percentage calculations were plotted against the equal cumulative percentage in the seed orchard [34].
There were significant differences in the amount of pollen shed and the degree of receptivity between each phenological stage. A weight value was assigned to each phenological stage to fully reflect the differences between clones. The weight values of female flowers in the ISf, PSf, and FSf were 0.4, 1.0, and 0.2, respectively, and the weight values of male flowers in the ISm, PSm, and FSm were 0.2, 1.0, and 0.2, respectively [9]. The proportion of pollen shed or receptivity equaled the sum of the frequency multiplied by the weight value at each stage in a whole day. The phenological synchronization index (POij) was then calculated as follows [35]:
P O i j = k = 1 n min ( M k i , P k j ) / k = 1 n max M k i , P k j
where POij is the phenological synchronization index between the ith and jth clones, Mki is the proportion of pollen shedding of the ith clone on day k, Pkj is the proportion of the female receptivity of the jth clone on day k, and n is the number of days of total flower duration of i and j. The variance of the synchronization index among different types (early, middle, and late) of female and male flowering was calculated by one-way ANOVA.
Linear regression analysis between the ISf and ISm and the FDf and FDm was performed to determine the influence of the initial stage of male and female flowering on flowering duration. Moreover, correlations between diameter at breast height (DBH) and Nf, Nm, ISf, ISm, and female and male flower duration (FDf, FDm) were analyzed by linear regression analysis. Linear regression analysis between POij and Cp, Sp, SOsc, and TSW was also performed to determine the implications of phenology synchronization concerning Sp and quality.

3. Results

3.1. Fertility Variation in the CSO

In the current study, the obvious variation of male and female flower production among clones occurred in the Chinese fir CSO (Table 2). A large difference was detected between male and female strobilus production, which was also the case among clones. The Nf and Nm varied among individuals within the seed orchard, and fertility was low (ψ = 2.03). The parent–balance curves for Nm and Nf revealed a significant deviation from balanced production (Figure 1). The most abundant 10 tree types (approximately 7% of total) produced 30.47% of Nm, and the most abundant of five tree types (approximately 6% of total) produced 32.63% Nf, indicating that the female and male parents unequally contributed to the gamete gene pool in the seed orchard. The coefficients of variation of females (ψf = 2.85) and males (ψm = 2.69) were low among clones. There was small difference in Np (93.59); the Npf (66.61) was lower than the Npm (0.59). Moreover, Nr, Nrf, and Nrm were low in the seed orchard, with values of 0.49, 0.35, and 0.37, respectively.

3.2. Genetic Variation in Reproductive Phenology

The ISm and ISf occurred on 7 March and 9 March, respectively (Figure 2). The ISm lasted 2–8 days, with an average of 4 days, and the PSm lasted 2–14 days; afterward, the trees entered the FSm after an average of 9 days. The ISf lasted 2–8 days, with an average of 4 days, and the PSf lasted 4–14 days; afterward, the trees entered the FSf after 9 days. There was a significantly negative correlation between FDf and ISf, with a high R2 value (0.464), but there was no correlation between ISm and FDm (Figure 3). Clones of the early phenological type shed pollen and sustained receptivity longer than did the clones of the late phenological type. The variation in ISm and FDm was significantly influenced by genotype (Table 3). All phenological traits exhibited moderate-to-low clonal heritability (0.272–0.476), and female receptivity reflected lower genetic control than did pollen shedding.

3.3. Phenological Synchronization

The rate of pollen shedding affects the female receptivity rate during the flowering period, which is beneficial to pollen dispersal (Figure 4B). There was an obvious difference in phenological synchronization among clones/individuals (Figure 4A,C). The phenological synchronicity averaged 0.286, indicating that there was 28.6% overlap between pollen shedding and female receptivity. The synchronization indexes of the clones ranged from 0.000 to 0.585 (with the clone as the pollen donors) and 0.000 to 0.385 (with the clones as the pollen receptors). Our analyses revealed only 28.6% overlap between pollen shedding and female receptivity, which ultimately affected the gamete contribution of the parents and the genetic composition of seeds. Approximately 41.61% of the combinations had a POij of zero, indicating that only approximately 60% of trees had an overlap of female and male flowering. Trees in the early (E), middle (M), and late (L) phenology classes showed significantly different POij values (Table 4). The group comprising F_M and M_M had the highest POij. The M phenology group had a higher mean POij than the other groups did, such as the F_M × M_M and F_E × M_M groups, whose POij values were 0.461 and 0.489, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the other combinations. The average POij of self-pollination was 0.298, which was higher than that of cross-pollination (0.236), indicating that there was a larger probability of selfing in the seed orchard.

3.4. Relationships between Seed Production, Fertility, and Synchronization

There were no significant differences in Cp or Sp among provenances and clones, but the variation in TSW was significantly influenced by provenance and genotype (Table 5). The low value of heritability (0.280–0.477) indicated that the seed traits underwent low genetic control in the seed orchard. The results of linear regression analysis showed that there were significant relationships between POij and both Cp and Sp (Figure 5), but POij showed a weak correlation with both TSW (R2 = 0.048, p = 0.280) and SOsc (R2 = 0.001, p = 0.868), indicating the phenological synchronization among clones had a significant influence on seed yield.

4. Discussion

Expected genetic gains may not be obtained if the gamete contribution deviates from that of random mating in seed orchards [33,36]. Differences in strobilus production have also been found among individuals or clones within a population of other forest tree species such as Cedrus libani [16], Eucalyptus camaldulensis [33], and Pinus koraiensis [15]. Notably, parent selection is important for Sp and orchard management. The variation in fertility causes gametic phase disequilibrium, which increases the general probability of inbreeding or pollen contamination in seed orchards [9]. The Np is used to characterize seeds produced from seed orchards; this parameter is based on correlations between male and female fertility. When the Np is small, the genetic composition of seeds produced in the seed orchard may be different from the expected value [15]. The Nr is used to compare the total number of clones and effective number in the seed orchard [15]. In this study, the Nr (0.49) in seed orchard was low, indicating that as much as 49% of the clones had the same coancestry and an average degree relatedness within the gene pool among seeds in the seed orchard. These findings also implied that a low effective population size leads to a low genetic diversity of seeds. Therefore, balancing the Np should be fully considered for orchard management. ψ expresses how fertility varies among parents, as this parameter reflects the increase in the probability that sibs occur compared to that when parents have equal fertility [31]. As in previous reports of C. libani seed orchards [16], the ψ in the seed orchard in the current study was 2.03, indicating that the probability that two individuals share a parent was twice as high as that when the parental fertility is equal across the seed orchard [13,16]. Hence, knowledge of the gamete contribution to variation in seed orchards is very valuable when breeders wish to obtain the maximum expected genetic gain.
Phenological synchronization is the basic information of major importance for management in seed orchards [24]. In our study, the genetic differences among clones for ISm and FDm was reflected by a GLM. As in other seed orchards [17,24], significant variation in flowering phenology among clones occurred in the Chinese fir seed orchard in the current study. However, unlike that of Chinese fir clones at another site, the male flowering of clones in the seed orchard in the present study started approximately 2 days before the female flowering [20]. The pollen shedding stage occurred prior to female receptivity, which was beneficial to pollination in the seed orchard. Regression analysis of the initial stage against pollen shedding and receptivity duration indicated that the pollen shedding and receptivity of the early flowering clones were significantly longer than those of the late-flowering clones. This suggested that duration of flowering is influenced by the initiation of flowering when the climate, temperature, and light conditions are consistent. Low synchronization results in nonrandom mating in seed orchards, reducing the genetic gain and diversity of seeds [24,37]. Somewhat lower phenological synchronization was also detected in a Quercus rubra seed orchard (POij = 0.30) [17], first-generation Chinese fir seed orchard (POij = 0.30–0.37) [9], and P. tabuliformis seed orchard (POij = 0.12–0.38) [24]. Because flowering differences resulted in decreased POij values, in the current study, the low POij of early flowering types of female flowers and of the early and late-flowering types of male flowers were likely caused by lower POij values across orchards. In our study, the average POij of the female parents was slightly higher than that of the male parents, but the Nf was significantly lower than the Nm. These results indicated that female flower management is more important for Sp than male flower management is under the premise that the seed orchard can still produce enough pollen and is a major factor affecting the genetic gain of seeds in seed orchards of Chinese fir. Moreover, self-pollination reduces the genetic gain and diversity of seeds. As in previous reports on first-generation seed orchards of Chinese fir [9], in this study, most clones had a high risk of self-pollination, as predicted by the higher average POij of self-pollination compared with cross-pollination. Measures should be utilized to decrease these effects, such as increasing the number of clones and selecting dichogamy parents.
The difference in Nf and Nm and flowering asynchrony cause imbalances in gamete contribution, decreased genetic diversity, and a high selfing rate and pollen contamination rate in seed orchards [9]. To achieve maximum seed yields, all female strobili must be pollinated by the pollen of male flowers in the seed orchard when the former are fully receptive to pollen [16]. The flowering habit of clones have a substantial effect on the genetic composition of seeds in seed orchards. Seed germination time, germination rate, and germination potential significantly influenced the TSW of Chinese fir [38]. Positive significant correlations were found between POij and seed characteristics in the seed orchard, indicating that the final seed yield and quality are influenced by phenological synchronization among clones. Consequently, this study is essential for providing basic information for making decisions for seed orchard management and future establishment of advanced-stage seed orchards to obtain the maximum expected genetic gain; these decisions include practices such as pruning, increasing biomass, controlling pollination, and adjusting parent configurations.

5. Conclusions

Significant variation in fertility and flowering phenology occurred between clones in a second-generation seed orchard of Chinese fir. The most abundant types of trees (7% and 6%) produced 30.47% and 32.63% male and female flowers, respectively, and the gamete contributions of the female and male flowers were unbalanced among clones in the seed orchard. A low synchronization index (POij = 0.298) and high risk of selfing in the seed orchard indicate that the rate of pollen shedding affects female receptivity during flowering. The average POij of female parents was slightly higher than that of male parents, but the Nf was significantly lower than the Nm; therefore, female flower management is more important for Sp than male flower management under the premise that the Chinese fir seed orchard could produce enough pollen needed in the future. Genetically, there is a low clonal Hc2 (0.272–0.477) for fertility and flower production. We also found a significantly positive correlation between POij and Sp and Cp, indicating that phenological synchronization affects seed quality and yield. Overall, management practices such as increasing biomass, controlling pollination, and resetting of parents are necessary to improve flowering synchronization and the balance of gamete contributions, which are beneficial for increasing Sp and quality in Chinese fir seed orchards. Furthermore, continuous monitoring of flowering phenology in seed orchards is important for obtaining high genetic gains and for providing reference data for the establishment of advanced-stage seed orchards.

Author Contributions

This study designed by J.X. and H.Y.; data collection were performed by J.X., Y.L., Y.Z. and X.H.; data analysis was conducted by H.Y., P.Z. and F.L.; authors J.X. and J.Y. wrote the paper; H.Y., L.C. and P.Z. modified the language. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Province under grant 2021YFYZ0032; the Sichuan Science and Technology Program under grant 2019YJ0416; and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province under grants 2022NSFSC1062 and 2022NSFSC0091.

Acknowledgments

We thank Guozhi Yu for the help during data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

CSOClonal seed orchardFDfFemale flower duration
NmNumber of male flowersFDmMale flower duration
NfNumber of female flowersFDmFlowering duration of males
ISfInitial stage of female flowerFDfFlowering duration of females
PSfPeak stage of female flowerF_EEarly individuals began receptive
FSfFinal stage of female flowerF_LLate individuals began receptive
ESfEnd stage of female flowerM_LLate individuals began shedding pollen
ISmInitial stage of male flower H c 2 The clonal broad-sense heritability
PSmPeak stage of male flowerNrRelative effective number of parents
FSmFinal stage of male flowerNrfRelative effective numbers of female
ESmEnd stage of male flowerNrmRelative effective numbers of male
CpCone productionPOijThe phenological synchronization index
SpSeed productionM_EEarly individuals began shedding pollen
SOscSeed output of a single coneCVmThe coefficients of variation for the male strobilus
TSWThousand-seed weightCVfThe coefficients of variation for the female strobilus
ψfVariation in female fertilityNpfThe effective number of female gametic parents
ψmVariation in male fertilityNpmThe effective number of male gametic parents
ψThe sibling coefficient F_M“Middle” in terms of the timing of their receptivity
NpEffective number of parentsM_M“Middle” in terms of the timing of their pollen shedding
DBHDiameter at breast height rThe correlation between female and male strobilus production

References

  1. Askew, G.R. Estimation of gamete pool compositions in clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 1988, 37, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
  2. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, L.; Vargas-Hernández, J.J.; López-Upton, J.; Ramírez-Herrera, C.; Jiménez-Casas, M.; Aldrete, A. Variation in reproductive phenology in a Pinus patula seed orchard and risk of genetic contamination from nearby natural stands. New For. 2019, 50, 1027–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kang, K.; Bilir, N. Seed Orchards (Establishment, Management and Genetics); CRN Promotion and Press: Ankara, Turkey, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Korecký, J.; El-Kassaby, Y. Pollination dynamics variation in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Silva Fenn. 2016, 50, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pupin, S.; Sebbenn, A.M.; Cambuim, J.; da Silva, A.M.; Zaruma, D.U.; Silva, P.H.; Rosse, L.N.; Souza, I.C.; Marino, C.L.; Moraes, M.L. Effects of pollen contamination and non-random mating on inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a seedling seed orchard of Eucalyptus urophylla. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 437, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kartikawati, N.K. Fertility variation of Melaleuca cajuput subsp cajuputi and its implication seed orchard management. Indones. J. For. Res. 2016, 3, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan, H.; Li, Z.; Fang, P.; Li, W.; Li, Y. Variation and Stability in Female Strobili Production of a First-Generation Clonal Seed Orchard of Chinese Pine (Pinus tabuliformis). Silvae Genet. 2014, 63, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bila, A.D.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation in Milletia sthuhlmannii, Brachystegia spiciformis, Brachystegia bohemii and Leucaena leucocephala and its effects on relatedness in seeds. For. Genet. 1998, 5, 119–129. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, X.; Shen, X.; Yang, P.; Pan, Q.; Li, W. A study on characteristics of reproductive phenology of Chinese fir seed orchard. J. Beijing For. Univ. 1995, 17, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kjær, E.D. Estimation of effective population number in aPicea abies(Karst.) seed orchard based on flower assessment. Scand. J. For. Res. 1996, 11, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lindgren, D.; Gea, L.; Jefferson, P. Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genet. 1996, 45, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kang, K.S.; Mullin, T.J. Variation in Clone Fertility and its Effect on the Gene Diversity of Seeds From a Seed Orchard of Chamaecyparis obtusa in Korea. Silvae Genet. 2007, 56, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kang, K.; Bila, A.; Harju, A.; Lindgren, D. Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2003, 76, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bilir, N.; Kang, K.-S.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation in six populations of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) over altitudinal ranges. Euphytica 2005, 141, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kang, K.; Lindgren, D. Fertility variation and its effect on the relatedness of seeds in Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii and Pinus koraiensis clonal seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 1998, 47, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bilir, N.; Kang, K.-S. Fertility variation, seed collection and gene diversity in natural stands of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani). Eur. J. For. Res. 2020, 140, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alexander, L.W.; Woeste, K.E. Phenology, dichogamy, and floral synchronization in a northern red oak (Quercus rubra) seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 2016, 46, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, L.; Vargas-Hernández, J.J.; López-Upton, J.; Ramírez-Herrera, C.; Jiménez-Casas, M. Clonal variation in phenological synchronization and cone production in a Pinus patula seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 2020, 69, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burczyk, J.; Chalupka, W. Flowering and cone production variability and its effect on parental balance in a Scots pine clonal seed orchard. Ann. For. Sci. 1997, 54, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bian, L.; Huang, D.; Zhang, X.; Tong, X.; Ye, D.; Jisen, S. Analysis on flowering phenology and synchronization indexed of Chinese fir clonal archive. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 44, 207–212. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gömöry, D.; Bruchánik, R.; Longauer, R. Fertility variation and flowering asynchrony in Pinus sylvestris: Consequences for the genetic structure of progeny in seed orchards. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 174, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, H.; Zhang, R.; Song, P.; Zhou, Z. Flowering phenology and synchronization of clones among plant ages in a seed orchard of Schima superba. For. Res. 2017, 30, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, H.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, Z. Pollen dispersal, mating patterns and pollen contamination in an insect-pollinated seed orchard of Schima superba Gardn. et Champ. New For. 2017, 48, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, W.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. Variation in Floral Phenological Synchronization in a Clonal Seed Orchard of Pinus tabuliformis in Northeast of China. Silvae Genet. 2012, 61, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.-Q.; Kirschbaum, M.U.; Hou, Z.; Guo, Z. Carbon stock changes in successive rotations of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (lamb) hook) plantations. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 202, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, R.; Hu, D.; Zheng, H.; Liu, W.; Liang, R.; Yang, B. Genetic variation analysis of flowering phenology in the 2.5 generation seed orchard of Cunninghamia laceolata. J. Southwest For. Univ. 2013, 33, 25–29, 43. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, X.; Li, W.; Pan, Q.; Yang, M. Studies on spacial distribution and the spread distance of pollen in Chinese fir seed orchards. J. Beijing For. Univ. 1996, 18, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  28. Corp, I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0; IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wright, J.W. Introduction to Forest Genetics; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, K.-S.; El-Kassaby, Y. Considerations of correlated fertility between genders on genetic diversity: The Pinus densiflora seed orchard as a model. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 1183–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, K.S.; Lindgren, D.; Mullin, T.J. Prediction of genetic gain and gene diversity in seed orchard crops under alternative management strategies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 103, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lindgren, D.; Mullin, T.J. Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can. J. For. Res. 1998, 28, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suraj, P.; Nagabhushana, K.; Kamalakannan, R.; Varghese, M. Impact of fertility variation on genetic diversity and phenotypic traits in second generation seed production areas and clonal seed orchards of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Silvae Genet. 2019, 68, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaisurisri, K.; El-Kassaby, Y. Estimation of clonal contribution to cone and seed crops in a Sitka spruce seed orchard. Ann. Des Sci. For. 1993, 50, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Askew, G.R.; Blush, D. Short note: An index of phenological overlap in flowering for clonal conifer seed orchards. Silvae Genet. 1990, 39, 168–171. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamalakannan, R.; Varghese, M.; Suraj, P.G.; Arutselvan, T. Options for converting a clone trial of Eucalyptus camaldulensis into a clonal seed orchard considering gain, fertility and effective clone number. J. For. Res. 2015, 27, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El-Kassaby, Y.; Ritland, K. The relationship of outcrossing rate to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 1986, 35, 240–244. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheng, L.; Chen, Q.; Chen, S.; Dai, J.; Dong, L.; Chen, X.; Tan, W.; Chen, D.; Huang, K.; Li, K.; et al. Study on cone and seed qualities among different Cunninghamia lanceolata clones. Guangxi For. Sci. 2021, 50, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Parental–balance curve of female and male strobilus production in the CSO.
Figure 1. Parental–balance curve of female and male strobilus production in the CSO.
Forests 13 01571 g001
Figure 2. Period of flower receptivity (A) and pollen shedding (B) of the clones. Note: (A) shows the period of female flower receptivity at the initial, peak, and end stages of the clones in the seed orchard; (B) shows the period of pollen shedding at the initial, peak, and end stages of the clones in the seed orchard.
Figure 2. Period of flower receptivity (A) and pollen shedding (B) of the clones. Note: (A) shows the period of female flower receptivity at the initial, peak, and end stages of the clones in the seed orchard; (B) shows the period of pollen shedding at the initial, peak, and end stages of the clones in the seed orchard.
Forests 13 01571 g002
Figure 3. Linear regression between the initial stage and male and female flower duration. Note: ** means a significant difference at the level of 0.01.
Figure 3. Linear regression between the initial stage and male and female flower duration. Note: ** means a significant difference at the level of 0.01.
Forests 13 01571 g003
Figure 4. Variation in phenological synchronization of clones/individuals in seed orchard. Note: POij is the phenological synchronization index of individuals. (A) Phenological synchronization among individuals. (B) Periods of pollen shedding and female receptivity in the seed orchard. (C) Distribution of phenology synchronization index values of all individuals.
Figure 4. Variation in phenological synchronization of clones/individuals in seed orchard. Note: POij is the phenological synchronization index of individuals. (A) Phenological synchronization among individuals. (B) Periods of pollen shedding and female receptivity in the seed orchard. (C) Distribution of phenology synchronization index values of all individuals.
Forests 13 01571 g004
Figure 5. Correlations between the synchronization index and Cp and Sp. Note: ** means a significant difference at the level of 0.01.
Figure 5. Correlations between the synchronization index and Cp and Sp. Note: ** means a significant difference at the level of 0.01.
Forests 13 01571 g005
Table 1. Information of clones in the second-generation clonal seed orchard.
Table 1. Information of clones in the second-generation clonal seed orchard.
OriginLongitude (°)Latitude (°)Collection No.
Fushun forest farm,
Sichuan Province, China
104.85 29.01 EQ48, EQ60, EQ59, EQ61, EQ58, EQ46, EQ41, EQ42, EQ43
Gongxian seed orchard,
Sichuan Province, China
104.71 28.45 T91, T72, T73
Hongya state-own forest farm,
Sichuan Province, China
103.26 29.70 T209, T204, T205, T206, T217, T218, T164
Nanchuan forest farm,
Chongqing Province, China
107.14 29.14 T313, T301, T312, T314, T311, T315, T316, T317, T309, T308, T307, T319, T320, T321, T305, T334, T336, T335, T328
Xuyong forest farm,
Sichuan Province, China
105.44 28.16 T358, T359, T367, T361, T360, T372, T363, T378, EQ22, EQ23, T382, T379, EQ24, EQ25, T380, EQ27, T312R, EQ28, EQ21, EQ29, T376
Yuejiang forest farm,
Sichuan Province, China
104.52 28.44 T2, T3, T6, T7, T5, T8, T13, T12, T10, T9, T14, T15, T16, T17
Junlian forest farm,
Sichuan Province, China
104.50 28.16 T101, T113, T114, T115, T119, T120, T105, T103, T109, T121, T122, T107, T106, T112
Table 2. GLM-based ANOVA for flower number in the CSO.
Table 2. GLM-based ANOVA for flower number in the CSO.
SourceTraitsdfType III SSMean SquareFHc2
ProvenanceNm637,855.4346309.2390.230
Nf63618.721603.1201.750
Clone (provenance)Nm791,770,227.26122,407.9400.8080.396
Nf7935,415.797448.3011.2850.318
ErrorNm551,507,138.58327,402.520
Nf5518,952.333344.588
Note: Nm, number of male flowers; Nf, number of female flowers. A total of 80 and 56 clones with male and female flowers, respectively, were included in the investigation; therefore, male flower data were collected from 80 clones, and female flowers data were collected from 56 clones.
Table 3. GLM-based ANOVA for the initial stage and flower duration.
Table 3. GLM-based ANOVA for the initial stage and flower duration.
SourceTraitsdfType III SSMean SquareFHc2
ProvenanceISm610.0561.6761.398
FDm657.5999.6002.040
ISf62.7390.4570.132
FDf625.3324.2220.300
Clone (provenance)ISm79173.7132.1991.834 *0.433
FDm791025.77712.9852.760 **0.476
ISf5580.7681.4690.4240.272
FDf55556.81710.1240.7200.356
ErrorISm5262.3331.199
FDm52244.6674.705
ISf2069.3333.467
FDf20281.33314.067
Note: ISm, male flower initial stage; FDm, male flower duration; ISf, female flower initial stage; FDf, female flower duration; * and ** mean significant differences at the levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. A total of 80 and 56 clones with male and female flowers, respectively, were included in the investigation; therefore, male flower data were collected from 80 clones, and female flowers data were collected from 56 clones.
Table 4. Average synchronization index at different flowering types.
Table 4. Average synchronization index at different flowering types.
MaleFemale
Early Phenological TypeMiddle Phenological TypeLate Phenological Type
Early phenological type0.197 a0.354 c0.266 b
Middle phenological type0.489 e0.461 e0.333 c
Late phenological type0.164 a0.381 d0.288 b
Note: The same letters mean no significant differences; the different small letters in the table mean significant differences.
Table 5. GLM-based ANOVA for Cp and Sp.
Table 5. GLM-based ANOVA for Cp and Sp.
SourceTraitdfType III SSMean SquareFHc2
ProvenanceCp51539.855307.9710.708
Sp5365.21173.0422.383
TSW513.7472.7493.740 *
SOsc50.4370.0872.548
Clone (provenance)Cp4018,319.518457.9881.0530.381
Sp402410.36060.2591.9660.368
TSW40127.043.1764.320 **0.477
SOsc401.8910.0471.3770.280
ErrorCp187825.833434.769
Sp14429.14930.653
TSW139.5570.735
SOsc140.4810.034
Note: Cp, cone production; Sp, seed production; SOsc, seed production of a single cone; TSW, thousand-seed weight. * and ** mean significant differences at the levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Cones and seeds from only 41 clones and 6 provenances were harvested for GLM-based analysis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, J.; Huang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, P.; Zhu, Y.; Li, F.; Yao, J.; Chen, L.; Yang, H. Variation of Fertility and Phenological Synchronization in Cunninghamia lanceolata Seed Orchard: Implications for Seed Production. Forests 2022, 13, 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101571

AMA Style

Xie J, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhu P, Zhu Y, Li F, Yao J, Chen L, Yang H. Variation of Fertility and Phenological Synchronization in Cunninghamia lanceolata Seed Orchard: Implications for Seed Production. Forests. 2022; 13(10):1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101571

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Jiaxin, Xin Huang, Yingquan Liu, Peng Zhu, Yuanwei Zhu, Fengqing Li, Jiabao Yao, Lianghua Chen, and Hanbo Yang. 2022. "Variation of Fertility and Phenological Synchronization in Cunninghamia lanceolata Seed Orchard: Implications for Seed Production" Forests 13, no. 10: 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101571

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop