Next Article in Journal
Global Tree Taper Modelling: A Review of Applications, Methods, Functions, and Their Parameters
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Profile Analysis Reveals the Regulation Mechanism of Stamen Abortion in Handeliodendron bodinieri
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Defoliation on the Defense Reactions of Silver Birch (Betula pendula) Infected with Phytophthora plurivora
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated SMRT Technology with UMI RNA-Seq Reveals the Hub Genes in Stamen Petalody in Camellia oleifera
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of miR397a and Its Functional Characterization in Callus Growth and Development by Regulating Its Target in Liriodendron

1
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education of China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(7), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070912
Submission received: 30 May 2021 / Revised: 9 July 2021 / Accepted: 9 July 2021 / Published: 13 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Genetics: Molecular and Functional Characterization of Genes)

Abstract

:
Callus growth and development, a crucial process in plant propagation, is involved in hormonal balance and abundant gene regulation. MiRNAs are key regulators in the process of cell differentiation and development. MiR397 was identified as participating in plant growth, development, and response to stress, and it was regulated by targeting the LAC gene. The regulatory function of miR397 during callus growth and development was not clear in Liriodendron. In this study, LhmiR397a and its targets were identified, and its regulatory function between LhmiR397a and LhLAC11 was shown using qRT-PCR and transient expression in protoplasts. Furthermore, to clarify the regulatory function of LhmiR397a-LhLAC11, transgenic calli overexpressing LhMIR397a, LhLAC11, and mLhLAC11 were separately obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transfer. The results showed that overexpressing LhMIR397a might retard callus proliferation, while overexpressing LhLAC11 or mLhLAC11 could promote callus proliferation. Genes associated with the cell cycle had decreased expression when LhMIR397a was overexpressed, while increased expression was observed when LhLAC11 or mLhLAC11 was overexpressed. Additionally, the calli overexpressed with LhMIR397a could generate early cotyledons 21 days after induction, and the somatic embryo induction time was short compared with other genotypes. This study identified LhmiR397a and its targets and provided a functional characterization of LhmiR397a in callus growth and development by regulating its target in Liriodendron.

1. Introduction

Liriodendron sino-americanum is an excellent woody tree species and garden afforestation tree species. It is crucial to improve the quality and yield of Liriodendron sino-americanum. According to previous studies, the somatic embryogenesis system is a powerful tool for massive propagation and character improvement of higher plants. As a result, the determination of the mechanism of somatic embryogenesis in Liriodendron sino-americanum is urgently needed.
Having pluripotency for regenerating new organs or whole plants under certain conditions is one central characteristic of plant cells [1]. The in vitro plant regeneration process often begins with callus induction. Callus refers to a disorganized cell mass and can be induced by wounding stress, which activates a set of reprogramming-related genes, including ERF115, WIND1WIND4, PLT3, PLT5, and PLT7 [2,3,4]. In addition, calli can be formed in vitro when cultured with an optimal ratio of auxin/cytokinin [5]. In Liriodendron, a balance between auxin and cytokinin successfully induced callus formation [6].
Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is the process of embryogenesis induced by somatic cells. Under appropriate conditions, calli can be induced to undergo the SE program [7]. The in vitro regeneration process was mainly regulated by auxin associated with cytokinin; a low auxin–cytokinin ratio could induce shoot regeneration, and a high auxin–cytokinin ratio could promote root formation [8,9]. In addition to phytohormones as regulatory factors, multiple genes were employed during the SE process. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous, noncoding, small RNAs of only 17–25 nucleotides (nt) in length [10,11]. Previous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs are essential for cell differentiation and the development process during early embryogenesis [12,13,14]. The role of miRNAs during somatic embryogenesis has been verified in multiple plants, including loblolly pine [15], Arabidopsis [16], sweet orange [17], larch [18], longan [19], cotton [20], radish [21], and Lilium [22]. Several miRNAs, such as miR156, miR157, miR159, miR160, miR165, miR166, miR167, miR390, miR393, and miR396, have emerged as key regulators in embryogenesis.
MiR397 was first identified as a novel member of the abiotic-stress-regulated miRNAs in Arabidopsis [23]. Later, several studies confirmed the stress responsive regulator of miR397 in other plants. In Arabidopsis [24] and Populus trichocarpa [25], miR397 was reported to be a Cu-responsive miRNA. In Arabidopsis [26] and maize [27], miR397 was identified as a regulator of nitrogen starvation. Dong [28] reported that miR397 overexpression improved plant tolerance to cold stress in Arabidopsis. The regulation of drought response in Oryza sativa was also confirmed [29]. In addition, in rice, Luo [30] identified that miR397 carries out a vital regulated role of maintaining embryonic cells in a thin wall and meristematic state. It also has a regulatory role in flowering and flower, seed, and fruit development in Arabidopsis [31,32], rice [33], Nicotiana tabacum [34], citrus [35], and pear [36]. Recently, the biological functions of miR397 were broadly involved in plant growth, development, and stress response [37].
In our previous study, we found that miR397 can be tested by chip hybridization, and the targeted transcripts of miR397 were identified by the degradome sequence. However, the regulatory effect of miR397 during callus development and differentiation in Liriodendron sino-americanum remains unknown. In this study, LhmiR397a was identified, and the sequences of LhmiR397a and its targets were obtained. Additionally, the regulatory role of LhmiR397a and its targets were further analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Synchronized cultures of somatic embryos at different developmental stages were obtained from an improved L. sino-americanum system (L. tulipifera × L. chinense) established in our lab. They were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further use according to previous methods [6].

2.2. Bioinformatics Analysis

The miR397 sequence was analyzed according to its miRNA sequence and microarray as previously reported. The miR397 sequence in other plants was downloaded from miRbase22.1 (http://www.mirbase.org/ftp.shtml, accessed on 30 June 2021). WebLogo 2.8.2 (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi, accessed on 30 June 2021) [38] was used to analyze sequence conservation. The secondary structure was analyzed with an RNAfold 2.4.18 (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi, accessed on 30 June 2021) [39]. The targets of miR397a were predicted with psRNATarget 2017 (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/, accessed on 30 June 2021) [40] and analyzed using a t-plots assay with the data reported previously.

2.3. Cloning and Transformation

The pre-miR397a cDNA was amplified from L. chinense (Lushan) by PCR with the forward primer 5′ GTG ATG AGG ACG GTG TCG GTC TTG 3′ and reverse primer 5′ ATT TGG CGC GCT ATC TAT CAT GC 3′. LhLAC11 cDNA was amplified with the forward primer 5′ AGA CAT GGA GTC ATG GGT TCG AG 3′ and reverse primer 5′ TCG GTC CAT CCT CAT CAT CTA TTG 3′. The mutagenic primer for mutant LhLAC11 was 5′ AAG AAG AGC TCT TCG TTT AGG GCG GCG TTA ATG AGC CGG AGC ATG 3′. The transient transfection vectors were constructed with the pJIT166 plasmid and transformed into Liriodendron protoplasts mediated by PEG. The protoplast was prepared based on a previous report [41]. The plant expression vectors were constructed with the pBI121 plasmid and transformed into Liriodendron calli by Agrobacterium-mediated transfer.

2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The total RNA of each sample was extracted using the Total RNA Purification kit (Norgen Biotek Corporation, Thorold, ON, Canada). The reverse transcription reactions for miRNAs and cDNA were carried out using the miRNA 1st strand cDNA Synthesis kit (by stem-loop) (Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) and the HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China), respectively. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the Roche Applied Science LightCycler 480. qRT-PCR was performed as described by Li et al. [6]. The expression level of 18S and Actin were used as the internal control to standardize the RNA samples for each reaction. The relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔ method, and error bars indicate the standard deviation of three sample replicates. The stem-loop primer for miR397 was 5′ CTC AAC TGG TGT CGT GGA GTC CGG CAA TTC AGT TGA ATC AAC GC 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for miR397 were a forward primer, 5′ ACA CTC CAG CTG GGT CAT TGA GTG 3′, and a reverse primer, 5′ AAC TGG TGT CGT GGA G 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for LhLAC11 were a forward primer, 5′ TGG GCC ACT CTC AAA TTG CT 3′, and a reverse primer, 5′ TAG GAG GAC GTT GGT GGT CT 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for CYCA were a forward primer, 5′ ATG CAA TGA ACA GGC AAC GG 3′, and a reverse primer, 5′ TTG GTG GTT GGT GCT GTC AT 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for CYCB were a forward primer, 5′ AGA GCT TGT GGA CTG TGC AA 3′, and a reverse primer, 5′ CAG CTC CGC GTA GAG GAT TC 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for CYCD were a forward primer, 5′ GTC GGA GCT CTT TCA GAC CC 3′, and a reverse primer. 5′ TGC AGT CGC GCT CTT CCA TTG TCT TG 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for 18S were a forward primer, 5′ ATT TCT GCC CTA TCA ACT TTC G 3′, and a reverse primer, 5′ TTG TTA TTT ATT GTC ACT ACC TCC C 3′. The qRT-PCR primers for Actin were a forward primer, 5′ TGG ACT CTG GGG ATG GTG TTA’, and a reverse primer, 5′ CTC GGC TGT GGT TGT GAA AG 3′.

2.5. Callus Proliferation and MTS Assays

Calli from the wild-type and those overexpressing LhMIR397a, LhLAC11, or mLhLAC11 were cultured on callus-inducing medium. After culturing for 25 days, the fresh calli were weighed. The cell proliferation rate was tested with an MTS assay using the Cell-Titer 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Kit (Promega) as described previously [42].

2.6. Physiological Analyses

The soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein content in different tissues were determined according to the method of Peng [43]. Fresh tissues (0.2–0.5 g) were obtained to detect and analyze biochemical events, with three replications performed per treatment.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of miR397 and LhmiR397a Differentially Expressed during Early SE

According to the miRNA sequence and microarray, we obtained four miR397 in L. sino-americanum. The miR397 in Liriodendron was 21 nt in length, which was consistent with that of most plants. The mature sequences of all four miR397s were compared with 84 mature miR397 sequences found in miRbase 22, and the results showed high conservatism among Picea abies, Amborella trichopoda, Camelina sativa, seven monocotyledons, and 23 dicotyledons. The 1st, 2nd, 14th, and 21st bases were completely conserved, while the bases at positions 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 15 were different (Figure 1A). To further identify LhmiR397a, the sequence of pre-miR397a was obtained with BLAST; the secondary structure was predicted with RNAfold. The results showed that the pre-miR397a might fold into a stem-loop structure (Figure 1B), which was considered a classical structure of pre-miRNA. The mature LhmiR397a was generated from the 5p arm of the precursor. In addition, the minimum folding free energy (ΔG), which is considered a threshold for assessing the identity of pre-miRNA, was also evaluated. In this study, ΔG for LhMIR397a was −49.41 kcal mol–1, which is within the standard range.
The microarray assay indicated that LhmiR397a was differentially expressed during somatic embryogenesis progress. To confirm the effect of LhmiR397a on early SE, qRT-PCR was used to test the expression level at different induction times. The results demonstrated that the expression of LhmiR397a decreased during early SE (Figure 1C), and the trend was consistent with the microarray. The expression level of LhmiR397a in the embryonic suspension cells 7 days after sub-culture (ES1) was the highest. It was then reduced in embryonic single cells 2 days after sub-culture (ES2) and further reduced in embryonic tissues 2 days after differentiation culture (ES3). It reached the lowest expression in globular embryos 7 days after differentiation culture (ES4). The results suggested that LhmiR397a may play an essential role in the early regulation of SE.

3.2. Three LAC Genes Are Targets of miR397a

Previously, studies showed that the laccase (LAC) gene is the target transcript of miR397a in other plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, Poplar, pears, tobacco, and Eucalyptus grandis. In L. sino-americanum, a strongly matched position in LhLAC was identified for LhmiR397a by PsRNATarget prediction. Based on the degradome sequence, cleavage on LhLAC was confirmed at the 10th and 11th bases (Figure 2).
To further determine whether LhmiR397a directed the regulation of LAC11 at the post-transcription level, transient expression of LhMIR397a was performed in protoplasts with LhLAC11 or the mutant of LhLAC11 (mLhLAC11). Sixteen hours after transfection, brilliant green fluorescence was observed when LhMIR397a was co-transfected with mLhLAC11. When LhMIR397a was co-transfected with LhLAC11, the fluorescence signal became almost invisible (Figure 3A–F). The green fluorescence signal was also observed when transfected only with LhLAC11. The results showed that LhmiR397a could regulate the expression of LhLAC11 through identification of the complementary sequences. qRT-PCR was used to test the expression of LhLAC11 in the protoplast transfected with different plasmids. The trend of the expression of qRT-PCR was consistent with the fluorescence signal (Figure 3G). When the plasmid containing LhLAC11 was delivered into protoplasts, the high expression level of LhLAC11 was tested. The level of LhLAC11 transcripts showed a marked decrease when co-transfected with LhMIR397a, while a dramatic decline did not appear when LhMIR397a was co-transfected with mLhLAC11. The results further suggested that LhLAC11 acts as a direct target of LhmiR397a through complementary sequences.

3.3. Downregulation of LAC Transcript Abundance by miR397a Overexpression

To further elucidate the roles of LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC11, LhmiR397a precursors LhLAC11 and mLhLAC11 were constructed to pBI121-based overexpression plasmids, and then introduced into calli by Agrobacterium-mediated transfer. After antibiotic screening culture for 2 months, transgenic calli were observed. Significant overexpression of LhmiR397a was found in randomly selected calli transfected with LhMIR397a. To examine whether the expression of LhLAC11 was altered in LhMIR397a-overexpressed calli, the same calli were analyzed by qRT-PCR simultaneously. Consistent with the regulatory pattern of LhmiR397a and its target, the expression of LhLAC11 was reduced with the increase in LhmiR397a.

3.4. miR397a Downregulated LAC Transcript and Affected Callus Growth and Development

To further elucidate the regulatory role of miR397a-LAC in the callus growth and development process, proliferation was investigated with wild-type and transgenic calli. After culturing for 25 days on the callus-inducing medium, callus proliferation was observed and the proliferation rate of calli, represented by the fresh weight, was analyzed. Callus-overexpressing LhMIR397a had a decreased growth rate, and the new growth calli were yellow with small particles. The LhLAC11-overexpressing calli had an increased growth rate, and the new callus granules were large and white (Figure 4A–B). Microscopic observation revealed that the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a had abundant cell inclusions, while LhLAC11- or mLhLAC11-overexpressing calli had thin cell contents (Figure 4C).
To further investigate the proliferation of calli with different genotypes, qRT-PCR was used to test the expression levels of cell-cycle-related genes, such as cyclin-dependent protein kinase genes. The results showed that the expression levels of CYCA and CYCB markedly decreased when LhMIR397a was overexpressed, while the expression levels increased when LhLAC11 or mLhLAC11 were overexpressed. There was no obvious difference in the expression level of CYCD (Figure 4D).
Afterwards, callus proliferation was assayed using a tetrazolium compound (3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt [MTS]) and an electronic coupling agent (phenazine ethosulfate). The OD values showed a significant increase in the calli overexpressing LhLAC11 or mLhLAC11, and the OD values decreased in the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a (Figure 4E).
In addition to the effect on callus growth, to clarify whether the expression of LhmiR397a had an effect on callus development, calli with different genotypes were cultured on somatic embryo-inducing medium, focusing on SE progress. The results showed that the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a generated early cotyledons after 21 days of induction, and the somatic embryo induction time was short compared with other genotypes (Figure 5). As abundant cell inclusion is considered to be a favorable condition for SE, we speculated that the overexpression level of LhmiR397a may promote somatic embryo formation, while the high expression level of LhLAC11 or mLhLAC11 may suppress somatic embryo formation.

3.5. Accumulation of Soluble Sugar, Starch, and Soluble Protein in Callus-Overexpressing miR397a

Concentrations of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein were determined in the wild-type and transgenic calli (Figure 6). The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein significantly increased in the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a. The amount of soluble sugar in the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a was the highest (2.819 mg/g FW); the content was 1.54 times higher than that of the wild-type (1.822mg/g FW), 1.99 times that of the calli overexpressing LhLAC11 (1.416 mg/g FW), and 2.19 times that of the calli overexpressing mLhLAC11 (1.289 mg/g FW). The calli overexpressing LhMIR397a had the highest amount of starch (15.231 mg/g FW), and the concentration was 1.5 times higher than that of the wild-type (10.178 mg/g FW), 1.5 times that of the calli overexpressing LhLAC11 (9.828 mg/g FW), and 1.8 times that of the calli overexpressing mLhLAC11 (8.374 mg/g FW). Soluble protein accumulated in the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a (35.6 mg/g FW), which was 1.2 times higher than that of the wild-type (30.438 mg/g FW), 1.4 times that of the calli overexpressing LhLAC11 (25.175 mg/g FW), and 1.6 times that of the calli overexpressing mLhLAC11 (22.763 mg/g FW).

4. Discussion

4.1. Characteristic Analysis of the miR397 Gene and Identification of the Target Transcript

miRNAs are a type of non-coding small RNA with a length of 17–25 nt. High conservation is widespread between the mature miRNA sequences in various plants. miRBase22 was searched, and 84 miR397 members were obtained from 35 plants. The number of miR397 members distributed in the plants was uneven. Picea abies had 21 miR397 members, which were the most numerous. Vitis vinifera, Ricinus communis, Theobroma cacao, Salvia sclarea, Digitalis purpurea, Nicotiana tabacum, Cucumis melo, Lotus japonicas, Prunus persica, Triticum aestivum, Fragaria vesca, and Camelina sativa had just one miR397 member. The majority (89%) of miR397 members were 21 nt in length, but 22 and 20 nt miR397 forms were also present. Four miR397 were also identified in Liriodendron by BLAST, all of which were 21 nt. After alignment with the miR397 from other plants, the highly conserved sequence was found in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 14th, and 21st bases, and the bases at positions 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 15 were different. Interestingly, miRNAs regulated the cleavage of target transcripts often located between 10 and 11 bases; therefore, the different sites may result in the differentially regulated targets of miRNA family members.
The miRNA genes were transcribed and further processed to generate pre-miRNA, which was in the shape of the stem-loop structure, while the mature miRNAs were located on the arm of the stem-loop [12,44]. The precursor of LhmiR397a could be folded into a stem-loop form with an appropriate ΔG, and the mature LhmiR397a was located on the 5p arm of the precursor. In addition to bioinformatics prediction, cloning was also performed to further identify the sequence of pre-miR397a.
Mature miRNA is incorporated onto an Argonaute (AGO) protein to generate an effector complex called an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [45]. Then, the plant miRNAs are implicated in targeting complementary RNAs for cleavage or perhaps for translational repression within the silencing complex to participate in development regulation [46]. MiR397 was first reported to regulate stress responses in Arabidopsis [23] and was then found to be regulated during post-embryogenic development in rice [30]. Afterwards, miR397 was reported to be involved in plant growth, development, and stress response by regulating its target LAC gene. In Liriodendron, LhLAC was predicted as a target of LhmiR397a, and the regulatory role was confirmed by transient transfection with protoplasts. The T-plot analysis further confirmed that LhLAC was regulated by LhmiR397a and also showed the cleavage site. We speculated that LhmiR397a performs a regulatory role in Liriodendron through its targets.

4.2. miR397a-LAC Regulation is Involved in Callus Growth and Development

miRNAs and their targets involved in callus generation and differentiation have been identified in many plants. In rice [30], miR397 exhibited high expression in undifferentiated embryogenic calli (EC), while it had low expression in differentiated tissues. In sweet oranges [17], miR397 was undetectable in EC but showed a high expression in globular-shaped embryos, as well as non-embryogenic calli. The target of miR397a was the LAC gene, which is a member of the multicopper-containing oxidase family. The homolog of laccase, ascorbate oxidase [47], was confirmed to be involved in cell growth and may control the cell-division cycle [48]. SKU, another member of the multicopper oxidase family, was identified to regulate root development by affecting cell expansion [49,50]. In Liriodendron, high expression of LhmiR397a may downregulate the expression of LhLAC11 and inhibit callus proliferation. When cultured on the callus-inducing medium, the calli genetically modified by LhMIR397a overexpression showed a significantly reduced proliferation rate. The calli overexpressing LhLAC11 had an increased proliferation rate, while mLhLAC11 overexpression led to a further increase in the proliferation rate. The increase in callus fresh weight in different genotypes may be caused by the cellular morphology or the rate of cell division. Many cyclins are involved in cell-cycle progression. A-type cyclins (CYCA) were highly expressed from the S phase to the M phase, and B-type cyclins (CYCB) were involved in the G2–M transition and during the M phase; D-type cyclins (CYCD) were mainly present during the G1–S transition [51,52]. In this study, CYCA and CYCB were downregulated when overexpressing LhMIR397a and upregulated when overexpressing the target of LhLAC11 and mLhLAC11, while CYCD showed no significant difference. Therefore, miR397a-LAC may affect cell proliferation because it affects the expression of cell-cycle-associated genes.
Studies have shown that the content of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein in plants is an important indicator of the physiological and biochemical status of cells and is involved in cell division and differentiation. Soluble sugar is the main energy source of plant growth and development, while starch is considered the main energy storage substance in plant cells, which participates in various physiological and biochemical reactions of the plant body and is an indispensable nutrient in plant culture in vitro. As the product of gene expression, the increase or decrease in protein expression is thought to be related to the process of cell growth and differentiation. In this study, there was a higher content in callus cells overexpressing LhMIR397a, and soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein contents were much higher than in the wild-type. In Ormosia henryi [53], the soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein content were higher in embryogenic calli than in non-embryogenic calli. These phenomena were consistent with the results of Albizia lebbeck [54]. The higher the soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein content in cells, the more active the metabolism in cells. A high soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein content in LhMIR397A-overexpressing callus cells, compared with the wild-type and callus cells overexpressing LhLac11 or mLhLac11, indicated that the LhMIR397A-overexpressing callus cells had a better material and energy base for cell differentiation and somatic embryo generation. Consistently, we found that the calli overexpressing LhMIR397a exhibited a short time for somatic embryo induction compared with the wild type.

5. Conclusions

In summary, four miR397s were identified in L. sino-americanum, and LhLAC was confirmed as a target of LhmiR397a. The high expression of LhmiR397a resulted in an decreased expression level of LhLAC and then inhibited callus proliferation and showed a significantly reduced proliferation rate. The calli overexpressing LhMIR397a showed a higher content of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein and required a shorter time for inducing somatic embryos than the wild-type. This provides us with a deep understanding of the regulatory function of miR397a-LAC in callus growth and development in Liriodendron. It also provides a useful resource for further studies on the genetic mechanisms of callus growth and development in other plants, since Liriodendron is regarded as a basal angiosperm.

Author Contributions

D.W., J.S. and J.C. conceived and designed the research. D.W. performed the experiments. D.W., J.C. performed data analysis. F.L., Y.L., T.C., Z.H. contributed reagents/materials. D.W., J.S. and J.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [32071784], the State Forestry and grassland administration [2020133106], and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Thorpe, T. History of plant tissue culture. Mol. Biotechnol. 2007, 37, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stobbe, H.; Schmitt, U.; Eckstein, D.; Dujesiefken, D. Developmental stages and fine structure of surface callus formed after debarking of living lime trees (Tilia sp.). Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cline, M.N. The histology and histochemistry of the wound-healing process in geranium cuttings in relationship to basal stem rot caused by pythium ultimum. Plant Dis. 1980, 67, 636–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ikeuchi, M.; Favero, D.S.; Sakamoto, Y.; Iwase, A.; Coleman, D.; Rymen, B.; Sugimoto, K. Molecular mechanisms of plant regeneration. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 377–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Skoog, F.; Miller, C.O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1957, 54, 118–130. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, T.T.; Chen, J.H.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, P.K.; Yang, L.W.; Lu, Y.; Shi, J.S. Deep Sequencing and Microarray Hybridization Identify Conserved and Species-Specific MicroRNAs during Somatic Embryogenesis in Hybrid Yellow Poplar. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steward, F.C.; Mapes, M.O.; Mears, K. Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Am. J. Bot. 1958, 45, 705–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Birnbaum, K.D.; Alvarado, A.S. Slicing across kingdoms: Regeneration in plants and animals. Cell 2008, 132, 697–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Valvekens, D.; Montagu, M.V.; Lijsebettens, M.V. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 5536–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, N.; Tu, L.L.; Tang, W.X.; Gao, W.H.; Lindsey, K.; Zhang, X.L. Small RNA and degradome profiling reveals a role for miRNAs and their targets in the developing fibers of Gossypium barbadense. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 80, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xie, F.L.; Wang, Q.L.; Sun, R.R.; Zhang, B.H. Deep sequencing reveals important roles of microRNAs in response to drought and salinity stress in cotton. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 789–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Bartel, B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 19–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, X.M. Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 25, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nodine, M.D.; Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs prevent precocious gene expression and enable pattern formation during plant embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 2678–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Oh, T.J.; Wartell, R.M.; Cairney, J.; Pullman, G.S. Evidence for stage-specific modulation of specific microRNAs (miRNAs) and miRNA processing components in zygotic embryo and female gametophyte of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). New Phytol. 2008, 179, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Willmann, M.R.; Mehalick, A.J.; Packer, R.L.; Jenik, P.D. MicroRNAs regulate the timing of embryo maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1871–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wu, X.M.; Liu, M.Y.; Ge, X.X.; Xu, Q.; Guo, W.W. Stage and tissue-specific modulation of ten conserved miRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis of Valencia sweet orange. Planta 2011, 233, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, S.G.; Han, S.Y.; Wu, T.; Li, X.M.; Li, W.F.; Qi, L.W. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in larch and stage-specific modulation of 11 conserved microRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis. Planta 2012, 236, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, Y.L.; Lai, Z.X. Comparative analysis reveals dynamic changes in miRNAs and their targets and expression during somatic embryogenesis in Longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yang, X.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Yuan, D.J.; Lindsey, K.; Zhang, X.L. Small RNA and degradome sequencing reveal complex miRNA regulation during cotton somatic embryogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1521–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhai, L.L.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.Q.; Yu, R.G.; Limera, C.; Gong, Y.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide Identification of Embryogenesis-Associated microRNAs in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) by High-Throughput Sequencing. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2014, 32, 900–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Xue, B.Y.; Gai, M.Z.; Song, S.L.; Jia, N.N.; Sun, H.M. Small RNA and transcriptome sequencing reveal a potential miRNA-mediated interaction network that functions during somatic embryogenesis in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sunkar, R.; Zhu, J.K. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Pilon, M. MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15932–15945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lu, S.F.; Yang, C.M.; Chiang, V.L. Conservation and diversity of microRNA-associated copper-regulatory networks in Populus trichocarpa. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liang, G.; He, H.; Yu, D.Q. Identification of nitrogen starvation-responsive microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Xu, Z.H.; Zhong, S.H.; Li, X.H.; Li, W.X.; Rothstein, S.J.; Zhang, S.H.; Bi, Y.M.; Xie, C.X. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in response to low nitrate availability in maize leaves and roots. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dong, C.H.; Pei, H.X. Over-expression of miR397 improves plant tolerance to cold stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Biol. 2014, 57, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, L.G.; Liu, Y.H.; Liu, Z.C.; Kong, D.Y.; Duan, M.; Luo, L.J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of drought-responsive microRNAs in Oryza sativa. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 4157–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, Y.C.; Zhou, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.Y.; Yang, J.H.; Chen, Y.Q.; Qu, L.H. Rice embryogenic calli express a unique set of microRNAs, suggesting regulatory roles of microRNAs in plant post-embryogenic development. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Feng, Y.Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, Y.F.; Yang, Y.W.; Lei, M.Q.; Lian, J.P.; He, H.; Zhang, Y.C.; Huang, W.; Chen, Y.Q. A natural variant of miR397 mediates a feedback loop in Circadian Rhythm. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, C.Y.; Zhang, S.C.; Yu, Y.; Luo, Y.C.; Liu, Q.; Ju, C.L.; Zhang, Y.C.; Qu, L.H.; Lucas, W.J.; Wang, X.J.; et al. MiR397b regulates both lignin content and seed number in Arabidopsis via modulating a laccase involved in lignin biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, Y.C.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Li, Z.Y.; Liu, Q.; Xu, J.; Liao, J.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Qu, L.H.; Chen, F.; et al. Overexpression of microRNA OsmiR397 improves rice yield by increasing grain size and promoting panicle branching. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Burklew, C.E.; Xie, F.; Ashlock, J.; Zhang, B. Expression of microRNAs and their targets regulates floral development in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2014, 14, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Cheng, F.S.; Dai, C.; Sun, Y.F.; Lu, J.; Huang, Y.T.; Li, M.M.; He, Y.; Wang, F.Z.; et al. Identification of microRNAs correlated with citrus granulation based on bioinformatics and molecular biology analysis. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 118, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xue, C.; Yao, J.L.; Qin, M.F.; Zhang, M.Y.; Allan, A.C.; Wang, D.F.; Wu, J. PbrmiR397a regulates lignification during stone cell development in pear fruit. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 17, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, S.L.; Zhou, J.J.; Gao, L.; Tang, Y.L. Plant miR397 and its functions. Funct. Plant Biol. 2020, 48, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Crooks, G.; Hon, G.; Chandonia, J.; Brenner, S. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1188–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zuker, M.; Stiegler, P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acid Res. 1981, 9, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, P.X. psRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Huo, A.L.; Chen, Z.Y.; Wang, P.K.; Yang, L.M.; Wang, G.P.; Wang, D.D.; Liao, S.C.; Cheng, T.L.; Chen, J.H.; Shi, J.S. Establishment of transient gene expression systems in protoplasts from Liriodendron hybrid mesophyll cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172475. [Google Scholar]
  42. Min, L.; Hu, Q.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X. Leafy cotyledon1-casein kinase I-tcp15-phytochrome interacting factor4 network regulates somatic embryogenesis by regulating auxin homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2805–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Peng, C.X.; Gao, F.; Wang, H.; Shen, H.L.; Yang, L. Physiological and Biochemical Traits in Korean Pine Somatic Embryogenesis. Forests 2020, 11, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Achkar, N.P.; Cambiagno, D.A.; Manavella, P.A. miRNA biogenesis: A dynamic pathway. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ha, M.J.; Kim, V.N. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Rydén, L.G.; Hunt, L.T. Evolution of protein complexity: The blue copper-containing oxidases and related proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 1993, 36, 41–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kato, N.; Esaka, M. Changes in ascorbate oxidase gene expression and ascorbate levels in cell division and cell elongation in tobacco cells. Physiol. Plant 2010, 105, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sedbrook, J.C.; Carroll, K.L.; Hung, K.F.; Masson, P.H.; Somerville, C.R. The Arabidopsis SKU5 gene encodes an extracellular glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein involved in directional root growth. Plant Cell. 2002, 14, 1635–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Zhang, K.; Wang, F.; Liu, B.Y.; Xu, C.Z.; He, Q.X.; Cheng, W.; Zhao, X.Y.; Ding, Z.H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, K.W.; et al. Zmsks13, a cupredoxin domain-containing protein, is required for maize kernel development via modulating redox homeostasis. New Phytol. 2020, 229, 2163–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Inzeé, D.; De Veylder, L. Cell Cycle Regulation in Plant Development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2006, 40, 77–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Veylder, L.D.; Beeckman, T.; Inze, D. The ins and outs of the plant cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wu, G.Y.; Wei, X.L.; Wang, X.; Wei, Y. Changes in biochemistry and histochemical characteristics during somatic embryogenesis in Ormosia henryi Prain. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 144, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saeed, T.; Shahzad, A. High frequency plant regeneration in Indian Siris via cyclic somatic embryogenesis with biochemical, histological and SEM investigations. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of the LhmiR397a sequence and its expression. (A) Analysis of sequence conser-vation in the miR397 family (weblogo.berkeley.edu, accessed on 15 June). (B) Hairpin structure of LhmiR397a precursors. (C) LhmiR397a expression level analyzed by qRT-PCR. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with ES1 by Student’s t test (** p ≤ 0.01).
Figure 1. Analysis of the LhmiR397a sequence and its expression. (A) Analysis of sequence conser-vation in the miR397 family (weblogo.berkeley.edu, accessed on 15 June). (B) Hairpin structure of LhmiR397a precursors. (C) LhmiR397a expression level analyzed by qRT-PCR. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with ES1 by Student’s t test (** p ≤ 0.01).
Forests 12 00912 g001
Figure 2. Target plot (t-plot) of representative miRNA targets validated by degradome sequencing. The red line and arrow indicate cleavage sites (x-axis), and the y-axis represent the detected reads. The alignment sequence of miRNA and target are shown on the upper of the t-plots. (A) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC2. (B) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC10. (C) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC11.
Figure 2. Target plot (t-plot) of representative miRNA targets validated by degradome sequencing. The red line and arrow indicate cleavage sites (x-axis), and the y-axis represent the detected reads. The alignment sequence of miRNA and target are shown on the upper of the t-plots. (A) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC2. (B) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC10. (C) LhmiR397a and its target LhLAC11.
Forests 12 00912 g002
Figure 3. Verification that LhmiR397a targets LhLAC11 by transient expression in protoplasts and qRT-PCR. (AF) Transient co-expression of LhMIR397a and its target reduces the fluorescence signal. (AC) In the ‘miR397+LhLAC11′ group, transient transfection with LhMIR397a and its target gene LhLAC11. (DF) In the ‘miR397a+mLhLAC11′ group, transient transfection with LhMIR397a and its target gene the LhLAC11 mutant (mLhLAC11). (G) The expression level of LhLAC11 tested by qRT-PCR. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with ES1 by Student’s t test (** p ≤ 0.01).
Figure 3. Verification that LhmiR397a targets LhLAC11 by transient expression in protoplasts and qRT-PCR. (AF) Transient co-expression of LhMIR397a and its target reduces the fluorescence signal. (AC) In the ‘miR397+LhLAC11′ group, transient transfection with LhMIR397a and its target gene LhLAC11. (DF) In the ‘miR397a+mLhLAC11′ group, transient transfection with LhMIR397a and its target gene the LhLAC11 mutant (mLhLAC11). (G) The expression level of LhLAC11 tested by qRT-PCR. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with ES1 by Student’s t test (** p ≤ 0.01).
Forests 12 00912 g003
Figure 4. Different transgenic calli in Liriodendron affect callus proliferation. (A) Callus growth of the wild-type (WT), overexpressing miR397a (OEmiR397a), overexpressing LhLAC11 (OELhLAC11), and overexpressing LhLAC11 mutant (OEmLhLAC11) on callus-inducing medium after 25 days. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Callus proliferation displayed as the fresh weight change. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with wild-type by Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01). (C) Cells observed with a microscope. (D) Expression levels of cell-proliferation-related genes were validated by qRT-PCR. (E) MTS assays.
Figure 4. Different transgenic calli in Liriodendron affect callus proliferation. (A) Callus growth of the wild-type (WT), overexpressing miR397a (OEmiR397a), overexpressing LhLAC11 (OELhLAC11), and overexpressing LhLAC11 mutant (OEmLhLAC11) on callus-inducing medium after 25 days. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Callus proliferation displayed as the fresh weight change. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with wild-type by Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01). (C) Cells observed with a microscope. (D) Expression levels of cell-proliferation-related genes were validated by qRT-PCR. (E) MTS assays.
Forests 12 00912 g004
Figure 5. Induction of somatic embryo with callus. Transgenic callus with LhMIR397a, LhLAC11, and mLhLAC11 cultured on embryo induction medium after 21 days. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Figure 5. Induction of somatic embryo with callus. Transgenic callus with LhMIR397a, LhLAC11, and mLhLAC11 cultured on embryo induction medium after 21 days. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Forests 12 00912 g005
Figure 6. Concentration of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein in different transgenic calli. (A) Soluble sugar concentration. (B) Starch concentration. (C) Soluble protein concentration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with wild-type by Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01).
Figure 6. Concentration of soluble sugar, starch, and soluble protein in different transgenic calli. (A) Soluble sugar concentration. (B) Starch concentration. (C) Soluble protein concentration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with wild-type by Student’s t test (* p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01).
Forests 12 00912 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, D.; Lu, F.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, T.; Shi, J.; Chen, J.; Hao, Z. Identification of miR397a and Its Functional Characterization in Callus Growth and Development by Regulating Its Target in Liriodendron. Forests 2021, 12, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070912

AMA Style

Wang D, Lu F, Lu Y, Cheng T, Shi J, Chen J, Hao Z. Identification of miR397a and Its Functional Characterization in Callus Growth and Development by Regulating Its Target in Liriodendron. Forests. 2021; 12(7):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Dan, Fengjuan Lu, Ye Lu, Tielong Cheng, Jisen Shi, Jinhui Chen, and Zhaodong Hao. 2021. "Identification of miR397a and Its Functional Characterization in Callus Growth and Development by Regulating Its Target in Liriodendron" Forests 12, no. 7: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop