Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms for Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Bark Beetle Infestation
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Urban Forest Types and Traits on Soil Organic Carbon Stock in Beijing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/f12040396
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages

by
Agnieszka Błasiak
,
Andrzej Węgiel
*,
Adrian Łukowski
,
Sławomir Sułkowski
and
Mieczysław Turski
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2021, 12(4), 396; https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040396
Submission received: 8 February 2021 / Revised: 23 March 2021 / Accepted: 25 March 2021 / Published: 27 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to understand the relationships between stand structure (tree size, volume, biomass, social position, stand density) and the variability of specific leaf area (SLA) at the stand level, which could improve forest management modeling. The study was carried out on 100 trees selected from 10 stands of Scots pine located in northwestern Poland. The stands had been established in a similar way and were similarly managed. Five mid-aged (51–60 years) and five mature (81–90 years) pure Scots pine stands were selected. To obtain the SLA index, we used the direct method, which involves scanning ca. 50 needles from each part of the tree crown. The average SLA was from 4.65 to 6.62 m2·kg−1 and differed significantly according to the part of the crown measured (p < 0.0001) and the tree age (p < 0.0001). The smallest SLA was in the upper part of the crown and the largest in the lower part of the crown, which is in line with the known relation to the light exposure of needles. Mid-aged stands of Scots pine have higher SLA values than mature ones. Dominant trees in mid-aged stands have a lower SLA than more shaded intermediate ones, which is probably due to the different lighting conditions within the canopy. No clear relationship is observed between the stand density and the SLA.

1. Introduction

Specific leaf area (SLA) is a ratio of leaf area per unit leaf dry mass (in m2·kg−1) that describes the distribution of leaf biomass in relation to leaf area [1]. SLA affects the efficiency of light capture and photosynthetic capacity [2]. This insight might contribute to regulating plant photosynthesis, growth, and productivity at scales from a single leaf to an ecosystem [2,3,4]. SLA is one of the most widely accepted key leaf characteristics [5], a key trait in plant growth [6,7], and an important indicator of plant strategies [8,9] that has been used widely in plant ecology, agronomy, and forestry [10]. Plants’ SLA is valuable information in making decisions on forest management not only from an environmental but also from an economic standpoint, and it is used as an easily measured parameter in several models of forest growth [11,12].
Specific leaf area is highly correlated with light level and decreases with increasing light intensity [13,14,15]. Therefore, SLA is related to a leaf’s position in the crown. Trees generally have a lower SLA at the top of the canopy, where direct solar radiation is received, and a higher SLA at the lower parts of the crown, where leaves may be shaded [16,17,18]. Plants grown under conditions of high light generally have thick leaves with a low SLA. This is an adaptation to maximize the radiant energy harvest. A given amount of foliage biomass should be spread over the entire crown of the tree. By having more biomass in a given area, the increase in the photosynthetic capacity of the high-light leaves comes at the cost of having less light capture per unit biomass at lower irradiances [15].
Stand structure has an influence on light conditions and therefore also affects the SLA [16,19]. Many studies have demonstrated that characteristics of the stand structure influence SLA, including stand age, stand density, canopy depth, and average tree size [13,20,21,22]. Stand structure can be regulated, to some extent, according to applied silviculture treatments, such as thinning operations of different intensity and frequency. Thinning reduces density, improves the resource availability for the remaining trees, and increases their growth [23,24]. Some long-term experiments have shown that the higher the intensity of thinning, the lower the stand growth, hence the most intense growth was noted in stands that had not been thinned [25,26,27]. By implementing thinning at various intensities and frequencies, it is possible to grow stands of different densities, which, in turn, affects forest growth, productivity [28,29,30], and profits [31]. Many management activities directly or indirectly affect the crown structure and foliage distribution. Understanding how these activities affect foliar biomass and traits guides treatments for specific purposes and aids the prediction of response to natural disturbances and the evaluation of different silvicultural systems [18].
Competition for light is especially important for light-demanding species such as Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), which usually forms even-aged stands, according to the common silviculture approach. Scots pine has the largest geographic distribution of all pine species and is probably the most widely distributed coniferous species in the world [24]. Scots pine covers 24% of the forest area in Europe [32] and is, therefore, a tree species of substantial economic and environmental significance [23,30].
Understanding the relationships between stand structure and the variability of SLA at the stand level could improve forest management modeling [19]. However, process-based models remain uncertain due to the scarcity of such studies at the stand level [19,21]. There is little research regarding the ratio of the leaf area to its weight in the context of stand density. Shi, Yu, Wang, and Zhang [19] focused on Chinese pine SLA on the stand level and compared it with changing density and crown length. Tree age was reported to be negatively correlated with SLA [33,34,35,36], but the effects of tree age and tree size are difficult to disentangle [19]. However, studies that have attempted to separate these factors suggested that tree size rather than age is the main factor influencing the foliar structure [37,38,39].
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of tree size, volume, biomass, social position, and stand density on the SLA of mid-aged and mature Scots pine stands in the central part of the species’ geographical distribution. We hypothesize that: (1) the SLA of the upper part leaves is significantly lower in comparison to other parts of the canopy, especially for dominant trees, (2) SLA is correlated with the stand age and is decreasing with tree maturation, (3) the SLA of the dominant trees is significantly lower than the thinned ones, and (4) density affects positively tree SLA in a significant manner.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was carried out on 100 trees selected from 10 stands (Figure 1) of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), located in the Drawno Forest District, northwestern Poland (E 15°50′–16°0′, N 53°10′–53°13′). This area has nutrient-poor habitats on podzolic soils, where the dominant tree species are Scots pine. It mostly forms uniform stands with a small admixture of other tree species. The altitude of this area is 100–120 m above sea level.
It was assumed that the stands had been established in a similar way (with the same initial spacing) and were similarly managed (with the same owner and manager). Since 1945, the stands have been managed by the State Forests National Forest Holding. Standard management practice in these stands has been to perform thinning once per decade, but selected stands had not been thinned in the past 5 years. The sample plots were located close to each other and in the same habitats to maintain similar tree growth conditions. The average annual rainfall in this area is 589 mm, the average temperature is 7 °C, and the growing season lasts 200–220 days [31]. Substantial differences in the density of the sampled stands could be the result of various biotic stressors (fungi, insects) and random events affecting forests during their growth.

2.2. Selection of Sample Trees

Tree measurements and sample collections were performed from July to September 2012. Five mid-aged (51–60 years) and five mature (81–90 years) pure Scots pine stands were selected. The differentiating factor was the stand density, expressed as the number of trees in a given area, ranging from 703 to 1373 and 476 to 824 trees per hectare for mid-aged and mature stands, respectively (Table 1). All the stands were characterized by shared attributes: a single layer of crowns, single species, even-aged, flat terrain (without hills or pits), same soil type (Carbic Podzol), same habitat type (according to Polish classification), site index (dominant height at a standard age of 100 years [40]) from 24.1 to 29.1, similar nutrients content in needles [41], not damaged or deformed, and without any gaps or understory. In selected stands, rectangular sample plots were established (one plot per stand) of 0.3 hectares in mid-aged and 0.5 hectares in mature stands (a minimum number of 200 trees per plot was assumed).
In order to select sample trees, on each sample plot all the diameters at breast height (DBH) were measured, and for 20% of the trees, their height was also measured. Based on these data, for each separate plot, Näslund’s height curves were calculated to establish the height of each tree. The social position of the sample trees was determined based on two attributes, crown position, and crown form, according to the Schädelin classification [42]. All trees in each sample plot were grouped into 10 classes of an equal number of trees based on their DBH. The mean DBH of the class ranged from 10.7 to 31.1 cm in mid-aged stands and from 15.3 to 36.8 cm in mature stands. In each diameter class, one sample tree was selected at random. In this way, 10 trees were selected from each plot, representing the range of diameters present. In total, 100 sample trees were selected.
Table
Table 1. Main characteristics of the sample plots established in mid-aged and mature Scots pine stands.
Table 1. Main characteristics of the sample plots established in mid-aged and mature Scots pine stands.
Sample PlotAge
(Years)		Stand
Density
(Trees·ha−1)		Reineke’s Density IndexBasal Area
(m2·ha−1)		Standing Stock
(m3·ha−1)		Mean ± SE DBH
(cm)		 Mean ± SE Height
(m)		Mean ± SE Stem
Volume
(m3)		Mean ± SE Aboveground Biomass of Tree
(kg)		Mean ± SE Needle
Biomass of Tree
(kg)		Canopy Depth
(m)
Mid-aged stands
15970363331.231224.1 ± 1.322.1 ± 0.40.50 ± 0.06257 ± 329.0 ± 1.56.7
25789065931.031020.9 ± 1.520.3 ± 0.60.37 ± 0.06188 ± 336.1 ± 1.16.2
355112073933.832520.1 ± 1.320.1 ± 0.20.31 ± 0.04160 ± 215.8 ± 1.06.3
453132370530.626516.7 ± 1.616.5 ± 1.90.24 ± 0.05120 ± 253.7 ± 0.85.8
555137385538.536418.1 ± 1.219.6 ± 0.60.24 ± 0.03112 ± 143.5 ± 0.56.2
Mature stands
68247657530.531928.5 ± 1.622.9 ± 0.50.71 ± 0.08357 ± 429.9 ± 1.27.5
78259061531.530125.2 ± 1.821.4 ± 0.40.51 ± 0.08244 ± 346.4 ± 1.06.4
88267260830.127524.3 ± 1.520.3 ± 0.60.48 ± 0.06235 ± 336.6 ± 1.16.4
98275671535.733424.3 ± 1.721.2 ± 0.50.48 ± 0.08244 ± 398.3 ± 1.57.0
108282465831.528621.4 ± 1.319.6 ± 0.30.34 ± 0.05167 ± 265.1 ± 1.06.2
SE—standard error; DBH—diameter at breast height. The equation for the Reineke’s Density Index after [43].

2.3. Needle Measurement

The tree crown of each sample tree was divided into 3 parts: upper, middle, and lower. We detached needles from branches in each part of the tree crown, mixed them, and then randomly picked 50 of the needles. To obtain the SLA index, we used the direct method of scanning 50 needles from each part of the tree crown. The fresh needles were scanned, and their dimensions were measured with the WinFOLIA Reg 2012a (Regent Instruments, Québec, QC, Canada). Aliquoted samples were dried in the Universal oven Model UFE 700 (Memmert GmbH + Co.KG, Schwabach, Germany) at 65 °C to a constant mass and weighed. Finally, each SLA was obtained using a scanned area of 50 needles divided by their dry mass.

2.4. Biomass Assessment

Sample trees were felled and divided into the following compartments (tree parts): stem (wood with bark), living branches, dead branches, foliage (needles), and cones. The fresh weight of each compartment was weighed directly in the field, and a representative sample of each tree part was collected. These samples were weighed fresh, dried to a constant mass at 65 °C, and weighed again. Using the sample’s proportion of dry and fresh mass, the dry mass of each part of each sample tree was estimated. The stand biomass was determined based on allometric equations developed on the basis of 100 sampled trees, which were presented in a previous paper [44].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To assess the impact of the studied factors and the main associated variable, i.e., DBH, two-way ANCOVA was conducted to compare the values of measured needle parameters of Scots pine sample trees. The analysis was based on the average needle data calculated for each part of tree crowns of model trees that belong to plots nested in the stand age category. One-way ANCOVA was used to compare the values of SLA of the three parts of the crown and of the whole crown for trees growing in stands of different densities, with DHB serving as covariant (cov). Moreover, a one-way ANCOVA was conducted to compare the values of SLA of the three parts of the crown and of the whole crown for trees of different social positions in the stands, with DHB served as covariant. Parametric Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated between SLA and selected stand parameters of the Scots pine sample trees. Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05) was employed to assess the significance of differences among treatments. Before all analyses, normal distribution was verified with the Shapiro–Wilk test. The data are given as means with the standard errors of the mean (±SE). Bold values indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).

3. Results

The needle parameters for different parts of the crowns of Scots pine trees are shown in Table 2. In mid-aged stands, the average needle length was from 52.7 to 63.8 mm, the average width was from 1.14 to 1.35 mm, and the average area was from 61.1 to 87.6 mm2. In mature stands, the average length was from 48.0 to 58.7 mm, the average width was from 1.14 to 1.35 mm, and the average area was from 55.6 to 80.4 mm2. All these parameters differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between parts of the crown. The largest needles (largest length, width, and area) were in the upper part of the crown, and the smallest were in the lower part of the crown. The length and area of needles also differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between mid-aged and mature stands. The average weight of one needle was from 9.5 to 17.4 mg in mid-aged stands and from 10.1 to 17.6 mg in mature stands. The average SLA was from 5.23 to 6.62 m2·kg−1 in mid-aged stands and from 4.65 to 5.57 m2·kg−1 in mature stands (Figure 2). It differed significantly between parts of the crown (p < 0.0001) and stand ages (p < 0.0001). The smallest SLA was in the upper part of the crown and the largest in the lower part of the crown. The interaction stand age × crown part was also significant.
The mean SLA of the whole tree crown differed significantly between stands of different densities for mid-aged stands (p < 0.0001) and mature stands (p = 0.0003). It also differed for each part of the crown except the lower part of the crown in mature stands (Table 3).
The mean SLA of the whole crown differed significantly between stands of different tree social positions for mid-aged stands (p = 0.0142) but did not differ for mature stands (Table 4).
In mid-aged stands, the SLA of the whole crown was correlated with the DBH, tree height, stem volume, needle biomass of the tree, and aboveground biomass of the tree. The SLA of some parts of the crown was also correlated with the same tree parameters (Table 5). In mature stands, the SLA of the whole crown was not correlated with any of these tree parameters. Only the SLA of the lower part of the crown was correlated with DBH, stem volume, needle biomass of the tree, and aboveground biomass of the tree. All significant correlations were negative (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The mean specific leaf area of mature stands was from 4.86 to 5.40 m2∙kg−1 (Table 3) and was within the range (2.87–5.50 m2∙kg−1) reported for 20 Scots pine stands located in different places in Europe [45]. On the other hand, the mean SLA of mid-aged stands was from 5.53 to 7.11 m2∙kg−1 (Table 3) and was above the range reported by Mencuccini and Bonosi [45]. Similarly, a high SLA of 6.16 m2∙kg−1 was found by Goude et al. [46] for young and mid-aged Scots pine stands in Sweden.
In both age groups of our stands, the SLA differed significantly between different parts of the crown. The smallest SLA was in the upper part of the crown and the largest was in the lower part of the crown, which was expected due to its known relation to light exposure [14,15,16]. Plants generally have a lower SLA in parts of the canopy where direct solar radiation is received and a higher SLA where leaves may be shaded. Many investigations have found that the SLA increases from the top of the tree to the base of the crown as leaves become thinner, and thus the ratio of area to mass increases [13,21,47,48,49].
We found significant differences between SLA in stands of different ages. Mid-aged stands had a higher SLA than mature ones. For many deciduous and coniferous tree species, it has been found that SLA is negatively correlated with tree age [18,20,34,50]. However, our results are in contrast to previous studies of Scots pine [38,51]. Van Hees and Bartelink [51] analyzed the foliage area characteristics of 12 trees selected out of 4 stands of different ages (9–38 years) in the Netherlands. Mencuccini et al. [38] sampled trees spread across the continuum of ages (up to 269 years) in Scotland. Both of them found that the age of trees had no effect on the SLA.
We also found that trees of different social positions differ significantly in SLA in mid-aged stands, which is probably due to the different lighting conditions within the canopy. The dominant trees had a lower SLA than the more shaded intermediate ones (Table 4). The effect of the tree’s social position on the SLA could be more noticeable if suppressed trees were included. These trees were not included in the analysis due to their very small number in the even-aged managed pine stands we investigated. A stronger effect of tree social position on the SLA was shown by the needles of the upper part of the crown. These differences were also more significant in mid-aged stands than in mature stands (Table 4). Kellomäki and Oker-Blom [13] observed for Scots pine that in suppressed trees, the SLAs were as high as 3–5 times those in dominating trees. For other tree species, lower values of SLA in dominant and codominant trees than in intermediate and suppressed individuals were also observed [52,53].
The stand density may have had an impact on the SLA, but our study did not strongly confirm this. Both younger and older stands of different densities had significantly different SLAs. However, no clear relationship was observed in mature stands, showing that SLA increases with stand density, but the mid-aged stands of highest density had the highest SLA (Table 3). We did not find such studies for Scots pine, but Shi, Yu, Wang, and Zhang [19] also found for Chinese pine that the stand density and SLA were positively and significantly correlated.
Our results to some extent fill the knowledge gap on the effect of tree and stand traits on SLA for Scots pine. Regulation of stand density by thinning intensity can affect some stand traits, including SLA and thus the photosynthetic capacity and forest productivity [2,4]. Stand density is also related to tree size [54,55], which can influence the value of forest products [31]. In addition, SLA could be related to the structural defense mechanism against folivorous insects. A high value of SLA indicating a low toughness of leaves differentiate heavily damaged shade leaves from the less damaged sun leaves [56]. Defoliation and insect performance are strongly associated with leaf toughness [57,58]. Furthermore, the indirect effect may relate to litter decay rate (nutrients cycling). Leaves with higher SLA have a faster rate of decomposition because they are more accessible to the microorganisms that decay them [59,60]. However, further studies are needed to complete our findings and allow for better management of stand density.
The SLA of the mid-aged stands was negatively correlated with DBH, tree height, stem volume needle biomass, and aboveground biomass of the tree. For mature stands, we found such a correlation only for the SLA of the lower part of the crown. All these attributes are related to the size of the tree. It is therefore possible that the correlations we found actually relate to the tree height because the position of the crown in the canopy is often associated with differences in light exposure. Some other studies have also shown that the SLA is correlated with tree size [48,61,62,63]. However, Nagel and O’Hara [16] were unable to detect the effect of tree size on SLA in even-aged pine stands but detected it in multi-aged stands. The effect of tree size on the SLA may be due to the fact that larger trees tended to have heavier, thicker needles [21].
Many different environmental variables (radiation, temperature, concentrations of CO2, nutrient availability, water limitation) can also affect SLA [10,64]. We did not study these factors because our sample stands were located on the same soils and under the same climatic conditions. However, our results for this case study may be an excellent resource for future analyses involving a broad spectrum of environmental factors.

5. Conclusions

Based on our results, we can draw the following conclusions:
  • The achieved SLA values of Scots pine needles growing in Poland are within the range of previously noted values for trees of this species of similar age classes.
  • The smallest SLA values are found in the upper part of the crown, which is in line with SLA’s known relation to the light exposure of needles.
  • Mid-aged stands of Scots pine have higher SLA values than mature ones.
  • Dominant trees in mid-aged stands have a lower SLA than more shaded intermediate ones, which is probably due to the different lighting conditions within the canopy.
  • Contrary to expectations, no clear relationship was observed between the stand density and the SLA.
  • Some parameters of mid-aged stands, like DBH, height, steam volume, aboveground, and needle biomass were negatively correlated with SLA. This has not been observed in mature stands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., A.W. and A.Ł.; methodology, A.B. and A.W.; formal analysis, A.Ł.; investigation, A.B., A.W. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and A.W.; writing—review and editing, A.B., A.W., A.Ł. and M.T.; visualization, A.Ł.; supervision, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (INT-09-0039). The publication is cofinanced within the framework of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education program “Regional Initiative Excellence” in the years 2019–2022, Project Number 005/RID/2018/19.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants of the International Scientific Camps for Forestry Students, ForseenPOMERANIA, for their valuable contribution to the laborious field studies on research plots in Drawno Forest District (Pomerania Region, Poland). We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments, which were helpful in improving the final version of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pierce, L.L.; Running, S.W.; Walker, J. Regional-scale relationships of leaf area index to specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen content. Ecol. Appl. 1994, 4, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Reich, P.B.; Walters, M.B.; Ellsworth, D.S. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 13730–13734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Schulze, E.-D.; Kelliher, F.M.; Körner, C.; Lloyd, J.; Leuning, R. Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: A global ecology scaling exercise. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1994, 25, 629–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Poorter, H.; Niklas, K.J.; Reich, P.B.; Oleksyn, J.; Poot, P.; Mommer, L. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 30–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wright, I.J.; Reich, P.B.; Westoby, M.; Ackerly, D.D.; Baruch, Z.; Bongers, F.; Cavender-Bares, J.; Chapin, T.; Cornelissen, J.H.C.; Diemer, M.; et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 2004, 428, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lambers, H.; Poorter, H. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1992, 23, 187–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Falster, D.S.; Duursma, R.A.; FitzJohn, R.G. How functional traits influence plant growth and shade tolerance across the life cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Grime, J.P. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. Westoby, M.; Falster, D.S.; Moles, A.T.; Vesk, P.A.; Wright, I.J. Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33, 125–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Poorter, H.; Niinemets, Ü.; Poorter, L.; Wright, I.J.; Villar, R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 565–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. White, M.A.; Thornton, P.E.; Running, S.W.; Nemani, R.R. Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME?BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls. Earth Interact. 2000, 4, 1–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nippert, J.B.; Marshall, J.D. Sources of variation in ecophysiological parameters in Douglas-fir and grand fir canopies. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kellomäki, S.; Oker-Blom, P. Specific needle area of Scots pine and its dependence on light conditions inside the canopy. Silva Fenn. 1981, 15, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, H.Y.H.; Klinka, K.; Kayahara, G.J. Effects of light on growth, crown architecture, and specific leaf area for naturally established Pinus contorta var. latifolia and Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca saplings. Can. J. For. Res. 1996, 26, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Evans, J.R.; Poorter, H. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nagel, L.M.; O’Hara, K.L. The influence of stand structure on ecophysiological leaf characteristics of Pinus ponderosa in western Montana. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 2173–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Temesgen, H.; Weiskittel, A.R. Leaf mass per area relationships across light gradients in hybrid spruce crowns. Trees 2006, 20, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goudie, J.W.; Parish, R.; Antos, J.A. Foliage biomass and specific leaf area equations at the branch, annual shoot and whole-tree levels for lodgepole pine and white spruce in British Columbia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 361, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J. The effects of stand structure on specific needle area in closed-canopy Chinese pine plantations. J. For. Res. 2013, 18, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. England, J.R.; Attiwill, P.M. Changes in leaf morphology and anatomy with tree age and height in the broadleaved evergreen species, Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. Trees 2006, 20, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weiskittel, A.R.; Temesgen, H.; Wilson, D.S.; Maguire, D.A. Sources of within- and between-stand variability in specific leaf area of three ecologically distinct conifer species. Ann. For. Sci. 2008, 65, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fellner, H.; Dirnberger, G.F.; Sterba, H. Specific leaf area of European Larch (Larix decidua Mill.). Trees 2016, 30, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Giuggiola, A.; Bugmann, H.; Zingg, A.; Dobbertin, M.; Rigling, A. Reduction of stand density increases drought resistance in xeric Scots pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 310, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tahvonen, O.; Pihlainen, S.; Niinimäki, S. On the economics of optimal timber production in boreal Scots pine stands. Can. J. For. Res. 2013, 43, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Curtis, R.O.; Marshall, D.D.; Bell, J.F. LOGS: A pioneering example of silvicultural research in coast Douglas-fir. J. For. 1997, 95, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuliešis, A.; Saladis, J.; Kuliešis, A.A. Development and productivity of young Scots pine stands by regulating density. Balt. For. 2010, 16, 235–246. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nilsson, U.; Agestam, E.; Ekö, P.-M.; Elfving, B.; Fahlvik, N.; Johansson, U.; Karlsson, K.; Lundmark, T.; Wallentin, C. Thinning of Scots pine and Norway spruce monocultures in Sweden. Studia For. Suec. 2010, 219, 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mäkinen, H.; Hynynen, J.; Isomäki, A. Intensive management of Scots pine stands in southern Finland: First empirical results and simulated further development. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 215, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. del Río, M.; Calama, R.; Cañellas, I.; Roig, S.; Montero, G. Thinning intensity and growth response in SW-European Scots pine stands. Ann. For. Sci. 2008, 65, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Valinger, E.; Elfving, B.; Mörling, T. Twelve-year growth response of Scots pine to thinning and nitrogen fertilisation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 134, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Węgiel, A.; Bembenek, M.; Łacka, A.; Mederski, P.S. Relationship between stand density and value of timber assortments: A case study for Scots pine stands in north-western Poland. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 2018, 48, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Janssens, I.A.; Sampson, D.A.; Cermak, J.; Meiresonne, L.; Riguzzi, F.; Overloop, S.; Ceulemans, R. Above- and belowground phytomass and carbon storage in a Belgian Scots pine stand. Ann. For. Sci. 1999, 56, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wright, I.J.; Leishman, M.R.; Read, C.; Westoby, M. Gradients of light availability and leaf traits with leaf age and canopy position in 28 Australian shrubs and trees. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Thomas, S.C.; Winner, W.E. Photosynthetic differences between saplings and adult trees: An integration of field results by meta-analysis. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Han, Q.; Kawasaki, T.; Nakano, T.; Chiba, Y. Leaf-age effects on seasonal variability in photosynthetic parameters and its relationships with leaf mass per area and leaf nitrogen concentration within a Pinus densiflora crown. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Greenwood, M.S.; Day, M.E.; Berlyn, G.P. Regulation of foliar plasticity in conifers: Developmental and environmental factors. J. Sustain. For. 2009, 28, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Niinemets, Ü. Stomatal conductance alone does not explain the decline in foliar photosynthetic rates with increasing tree age and size in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiol. 2002, 22, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mencuccini, M.; Martínez-Vilalta, J.; Vanderklein, D.; Hamid, H.A.; Korakaki, E.; Lee, S.; Michiels, B. Size-mediated ageing reduces vigour in trees. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Vanderklein, D.; Martínez-Vilalta, J.; Lee, S.; Mencuccini, M. Plant size, not age, regulates growth and gas exchange in grafted Scots pine trees. Tree Physiol. 2007, 27, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Socha, J.; Tymińska-Czabańska, L.; Grabska, E.; Orzeł, S. Site index models for main forest-forming tree species in Poland. Forests 2020, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Węgiel, A.; Bielinis, E.; Polowy, K. Macronutrient stocks in Scots pine stands of different densities. Forests 2018, 9, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wertz, B.; Bembenek, M.; Karaszewski, Z.; Ochał, W.; Skorupski, M.; Strzeliński, P.; Węgiel, A.; Mederski, P.S. Impact of stand density and tree social status on aboveground biomass allocation of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. Forests 2020, 11, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pretzsch, H.; Biber, P. A Re-Evaluation of Reineke’s Rule and Stand Density Index. For. Sci. 2005, 51, 304–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Węgiel, A.; Polowy, K. Aboveground carbon content and storage in mature Scots pine stands of different densities. Forests 2020, 11, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mencuccini, M.; Bonosi, L. Leaf/sapwood area ratios in Scots pine show acclimation across Europe. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Goude, M.; Nilsson, U.; Holmström, E. Comparing direct and indirect leaf area measurements for Scots pine and Norway spruce plantations in Sweden. Eur. J. For. Res. 2019, 138, 1033–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Han, Q.; Kawasaki, T.; Katahata, S.; Mukai, Y.; Chiba, Y. Horizontal and vertical variations in photosynthetic capacity in a Pinus densiflora crown in relation to leaf nitrogen allocation and acclimation to irradiance. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Marshall, J.D.; Monserud, R.A. Foliage height influences specific leaf area of three conifer species. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xiao, C.-W.; Ceulemans, R. Allometric relationships for needle area of different needle age classes in young Scots pines: Needles, branches and trees. Forestry 2004, 77, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Day, M.E.; Greenwood, M.S.; White, A.S. Age-related changes in foliar morphology and physiology in red spruce and their influence on declining photosynthetic rates and productivity with tree age. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. van Hees, A.F.M.; Bartelink, H.H. Needle area relationships of Scots pine in the Netherlands. For. Ecol. Manag. 1993, 58, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barna, M. Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: Leaf size variation. Pol. J. Ecol. 2004, 52, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  53. Konôpka, B.; Pajtík, J.; Marušák, R.; Bošeľa, M.; Lukac, M. Specific leaf area and leaf area index in developing stands of Fagus sylvatica L. and Picea abies Karst. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 364, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mäkinen, H.; Isomäki, A. Thinning intensity and long-term changes in increment and stem form of Scots pine trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 203, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Del Rio, M.; Montero, G.; Bravo, F. Analysis of diameter-density relationships and self-thinning in non-thinned even-aged Scots pine stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 142, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karolewski, P.; Giertych, M.J.; Żmuda, M.; Jagodziński, A.M.; Oleksyn, J. Season and light affect constitutive defenses of understory shrub species against folivorous insects. Acta Oecologica 2013, 53, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Peeters, P.J.; Sanson, G.; Read, J. Leaf biomechanical properties and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dominy, N.J.; Grubb, P.J.; Jackson, R.V.; Lucas, P.W.; Metcalfe, D.J.; Svenning, J.-C.; Turner, I.M. In tropical lowland rain forests monocots have tougher leaves than dicots, and include a new kind of tough leaf. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 1363–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cornwell, W.K.; Cornelissen, J.H.; Amatangelo, K.; Dorrepaal, E.; Eviner, V.T.; Godoy, O.; Hobbie, S.E.; Hoorens, B.; Kurokawa, H.; Pérez-Harguindeguy, N.; et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Łukowski, A.; Giertych, M.J.; Żmuda, M.; Mąderek, E.; Adamczyk, D.; Karolewski, P. Decomposition of herbivore-damaged leaves of understory species growing in oak and pine stands. Forests 2021, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hager, H.; Sterba, H. Specific leaf area and needle weight of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in stands of different densities. Can. J. For. Res. 1985, 15, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Niinemets, Ü.; Kull, O. Effects of light availability and tree size on the architecture of assimilative surface in the canopy of Picea abies: Variation in shoot structure. Tree Physiol. 1995, 15, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Monserud, R.A.; Marshall, J.D. Allometric crown relations in three northern Idaho conifer species. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29, 521–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wright, I.J.; Reich, P.B.; Westoby, M. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct. Ecol. 2001, 15, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Forests 12 00396 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of sample plots in mid-aged and mature Scots pine stands in northwestern Poland.
Figure 1. Distribution of sample plots in mid-aged and mature Scots pine stands in northwestern Poland.
Forests 12 00396 g001
Forests 12 00396 g002 550
Figure 2. Boxplots with specific leaf area (SLA) of needle different crown parts (lower, middle, and upper) of Scots pine sample trees growing in mid-aged and mature stands. Results of the ANCOVA are presented. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different ages and crown parts (p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Figure 2. Boxplots with specific leaf area (SLA) of needle different crown parts (lower, middle, and upper) of Scots pine sample trees growing in mid-aged and mature stands. Results of the ANCOVA are presented. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different ages and crown parts (p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Forests 12 00396 g002
Table
Table 2. Means (±standard error) of the needle parameters of Scots pine sample trees with ANCOVA results. Statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table 2. Means (±standard error) of the needle parameters of Scots pine sample trees with ANCOVA results. Statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Stand Age
(Development Stage)		Crown PartNNeedle
Length
(mm)		Needle Width
(mm)		Needle
Area
(mm2)		Needle Weight
(mg)
Mid-agedUpper4863.8 ± 0.31.35 ± 0.00487.6 ± 0.617.4 ± 0.64
Middle4857.3 ± 0.21.23 ± 0.00471.1 ± 0.412.4 ± 0.44
Lower4852.7 ± 0.21.14 ± 0.00461.1 ± 0.49.5 ± 0.33
MatureUpper4958.7 ± 0.21.35 ± 0.00580.4 ± 0.517.6 ± 0.57
Middle5053.0 ± 0.21.23 ± 0.00466.3 ± 0.413.1 ± 0.42
Lower5048.0 ± 0.21.14 ± 0.00455.6 ± 0.410.1 ± 0.33
ANCOVADf
Stand age1F52.802.0532.921.59
p<0.00010.1540<0.00010.2080
Crown part2F69.8085.61113.08147.24
p<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Stand age × crown part2F0.130.080.200.1111
p0.87550.91930.81640.8949
DBH(cov)1F13.1212.5121.0031.27
p0.00030.0005<0.0001<0.0001
Df error286
N—number of samples.
Table
Table 3. The mean SLA of the three parts of the crown (upper, middle, and lower) and the mean SLA of the whole crown for trees growing in stands of different densities. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different densities (p = 0.05).
Table 3. The mean SLA of the three parts of the crown (upper, middle, and lower) and the mean SLA of the whole crown for trees growing in stands of different densities. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different densities (p = 0.05).
Plot
Number		Stand
Density
(Trees·ha−1)		Mean (±SE) SLA of Different Part of Crown (m2 kg−1)Mean (±SE) SLA of Whole Crown
(m2 kg−1)
UpperMiddleLower
Mid-aged stands
17034.89 ± 0.11 b5.50 ± 0.15 b6.31 ± 0.20 b5.57 ± 0.14 b
28905.25 ± 0.29 b5.54 ± 0.37 b6.44 ± 0.47 b5.72 ± 0.23 b
311204.98 ± 0.15 b5.96 ± 0.18 b6.47 ± 0.18 b5.80 ± 0.15 b
413235.01 ± 0.14 b5.59 ± 0.16 b6.04 ± 0.16 b5.53 ± 0.12 b
513736.22 ± 0.50 a7.17 ± 0.29 a7.77 ± 0.36 a7.11 ± 0.25 a
ANCOVADf
Stand
density		4F5.555.922.899.78
p0.00100.00070.0331<0.0001
DBH(cov)1F3.847.494.1712.28
p0.05630.14610.04720.0197
Df error44
Mature stands
14764.83 ± 0.14 a5.06 ± 0.16 ab5.44 ± 0.155.11 ± 0.10 ab
25904.90 ± 0.11 a5.45 ± 0.16 a5.70 ± 0.185.34 ± 0.10 ab
36724.35 ± 0.08 b4.71 ± 0.10 b5.52 ± 0.114.86 ± 0.11 b
47564.84 ± 0.18 a5.55 ± 0.10 a5.81 ± 0.175.40 ± 0.12 a
58244.32 ± 0.12 b4.93 ± 0.15 c5.39 ± 0.164.88 ± 0.12 b
ANCOVADf
Stand
density		4F8.338.252.246.47
p<0.0001<0.00010.07940.0003
DBH(cov)1F12.807.3811.4313.26
p0.00090.00940.00150.0007
Df error44
Statistically significant correlations at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 4. The mean SLA of the three parts of the crown (upper, middle, and lower) and the mean SLA of the whole crown for trees of different social positions. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different social positions (p = 0.05).
Table 4. The mean SLA of the three parts of the crown (upper, middle, and lower) and the mean SLA of the whole crown for trees of different social positions. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey’s honestly significant difference test) between stands of different social positions (p = 0.05).
Social Position of a TreeMean (±SE) SLA of Different Part of Crown (m2 kg−1)Mean (±SE) SLA of Whole Crown
(m2 kg−1)
UpperMiddleLower
Mid-aged stands
Dominant5.10 ± 0.09 b5.89 ± 0.166.63 ± 0.16 a5.92 ± 0.14 ab
Codominant5.03 ± 0.28 b5.63 ± 0.136.17 ± 0.27 b5.67 ± 0.26 b
Intermediate6.90 ± 0.74 a6.88 ± 0.587.67 ± 0.93 a7.15 ± 0.48 a
ANCOVADf
Social
position		2F8.993.154.104.67
p0.00050.05220.02310.0142
DBH(cov)1F2.214.345.265.85
p0.14380.04280.02640.0196
Df error46
Mature stands
Dominant4.51 ± 0.075.00 ± 0.085.47 ± 0.084.99 ± 0.06
Codominant4.86 ± 0.135.40 ± 0.155.91 ± 0.125.37 ± 0.12
Intermediate4.86 ± 0.235.23 ± 0.215.45 ± 0.195.18 ± 0.19
ANCOVADf
Social
position		2F3.071.952.512.06
p0.05630.15390.09290.1388
DBH(cov)1F0.080.033.050.43
p0.77770.85840.06780.5139
Df error46
Statistically significant correlations at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Table
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the SLA and selected stand parameters of the Scots pine sample trees.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the SLA and selected stand parameters of the Scots pine sample trees.
SLA DBHTree
Height		Stem
Volume		Needle
Biomass
of Tree		Aboveground Biomass
of Tree
Mid-aged stands
Crown partUpper−0.342−0.425−0.329−0.325−0.347
Middle−0.294−0.243−0.297−0.284−0.296
Lower−0.270−0.260−0.323−0.289−0.313
Whole crown−0.348−0.340−0.370−0.358−0.369
Mature stands
Crown partUpper−0.1930.029−0.136−0.144−0.107
Middle−0.191−0.029−0.164−0.139−0.161
Lower−0.348−0.241−0.309−0.292−0.2937
Whole crown−0.269−0.093−0.223−0.212−0.207
Statistically significant correlations at p < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Błasiak, A.; Węgiel, A.; Łukowski, A.; Sułkowski, S.; Turski, M. The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages. Forests 2021, 12, 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040396

AMA Style

Błasiak A, Węgiel A, Łukowski A, Sułkowski S, Turski M. The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages. Forests. 2021; 12(4):396. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Błasiak, Agnieszka, Andrzej Węgiel, Adrian Łukowski, Sławomir Sułkowski, and Mieczysław Turski. 2021. "The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages" Forests 12, no. 4: 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040396

APA Style

Błasiak, A., Węgiel, A., Łukowski, A., Sułkowski, S., & Turski, M. (2021). The Effects of Tree and Stand Traits on the Specific Leaf Area in Managed Scots Pine Forests of Different Ages. Forests, 12(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop