Logging Industry in the United States: Employment and Profitability
2. Data and Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
3. Results and Discussions
3.3. General Discussion
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
- Häggström, C.; Kawasaki, A.; Lidestav, G. Profiles of forestry contractors and development of the forestry-contracting sector in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 2013, 28, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodson, E.; Hayes, S.; Meek, J.; Keyes, C.R. Montana logging machine rates. Int. J. For. Eng. 2015, 26, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Facchinetti, D. Logging companies in the European mountains: An example from the Italian Alps. Int. J. For. Eng. 2013, 24, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirk, P.M.; Byers, J.S.; Parker, R.J.; Sullman, M.J. Mechanisation developments within the New Zealand forest industry: The human factors. J. For. Eng. 1997, 8, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
- Erlandsson, E. The Impact of Industrial Context on Procurement, Management and Development of Harvesting Services: A Comparison of Two Swedish Forest Owners Associations. Forests 2013, 4, 1171–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conrad, I.V.J.L.; Greene, W.D.; Hiesl, P. A Review of Changes in US Logging Businesses 1980s–Present. J. For. 2018, 116, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rummer, R.B. Labor for Forestry Operations? Issues for the 1990s. Trans. ASAE 1994, 37, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, S.A.; Greene, W.D. Changes in Georgia’s logging workforce, 1987–2007. South. J. Appl. For. 2008, 32, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Grushecky, S.T.; McGill, D.W.; Anderson, R.B. Inventory of Wood Residues in Southern West Virginia. North. J. Appl. For. 2006, 23, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Broussard Allred, S. Logging firm succession and retention. For. Prod. J. 2009, 59, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
- Bolding, M.C.; Barrett, S.M.; Munsell, J.F.; Groover, M.C. Characteristics of Virginia’s logging businesses in a changing timber market. For. Prod. J. 2010, 60, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egan, A. Characteristics of and Challenges Faced by Logging Business Owners in Southern New England. North. J. Appl. For. 2011, 28, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Leon, B.H.; Benjamin, J.G. A Survey of Business Attributes, Harvest Capacity and Equipment Infrastructure of Logging Businesses in the Northern Forest; School of Forest Resources, University of Maine: Orono, ME, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Greene, W.D.; Marchman, S.C.; Baker, S.A. Changes in logging firm demographics and logging capacity in the US South. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Council on Forest Engineering Meeting, Missoula, MT, USA, 7–10 July 2013; p. 7. [Google Scholar]
- LeBel, L.G.; Stuart, W.B. Technical Efficiency Evaluation of Logging Contractors Using a Nonparametric Model. J. For. Eng. 1998, 9, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, T.T.; Han, H.; Shook, S.R. A structural assessment of the contract logging sector in the Inland Northwest. For. Prod. J. 2008, 58, 27. [Google Scholar]
- Butler, B.J. Family Forest Owners of the United States, 2006; Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2008; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Grice, A.; Peer, J.M.; Morris, G.T. (Eds.) Today’s aging workforce—Who will fill their shoes? In Proceedings of the 64th Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers; IEEE, College Station, TX, USA, 11–14 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Schwatka, N.V.; Butler, L.M.; Rosecrance, J.R. An Aging Workforce and Injury in the Construction Industry. Epidemiologic Rev. 2011, 34, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Dorr, B.M.; Feuerhelm, S.L. Addressing the silver tsunami in the accounting industry. J. Work. Manag. 2021, 13, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eriksson, M.; Lebel, L.; Lindroos, O. The Effect of Customer–Contractor Alignment in Forest Harvesting Services on Contractor Profitability and the Risk for Relationship Breakdown. Forests 2017, 8, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mac Donagh, P.; Velazco, S.J.E.; Botta, G.F.; Schlichter, T.; Cubbage, F. Logging Contractors’ Growth in the Southern Cone: An Analysis of Contractor Business Strategies, Innovation, and Mechanization. Forests 2019, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hultaker, O.; Bohlin, F. Developing the business: Logging contractors’ strategic choices for profitability and work environment. In Scandinavian Forest Economics, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Vallvägen, Sweden, 2004; 2004; pp. 13–22. Available online: http://www.metla.fi/tapahtumat/2004/ssfe/presentations/wg1/ssfe-Hultaker_Bohlin-2004.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2020).
- Demir, M. Investigation of timber harvesting mechanization progress in Turkey. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 1628–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rickenbach, M.; Steele, T.W. Comparing mechanized and non-mechanized logging firms in Wisconsin: Implications for a dynamic ownership and policy environment. For. Prod. J. 2005, 55, 21. [Google Scholar]
- Conrad, J.L., IV; Greene, W.D.; Hiesl, P. The evolution of logging businesses in Georgia 1987–2017 and South Carolina 2012–2017. For. Sci. 2018, 64, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abt, K.L. Employment and income trends and projections for forest-based sectors in the US. In The Southern Forest Futures Project: Technical Report; Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-178; USDA-Forest Service; Wear, D.N., Greis, J.G., Eds.; Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2013; Volume 178, pp. 293–308. [Google Scholar]
- Egan, A.; Taggart, D. Public Perceptions of the Logging Profession in Maine and Implications for Logger Recruitment. North. J. Appl. For. 2009, 26, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Bayne, K.M.; Parker, R.J. The introduction of robotics for New Zealand forestry operations: Forest sector employee perceptions and implications. Technol. Soc. 2012, 34, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penttinen, M.J.; Mikkola, J.; Rummukainen, A. Profitability of Wood Harvesting Enterprises; Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute; Finnish Forest Research Institute: Helsinki, Finland, 2009; Volume 126. [Google Scholar]
- Soirinsuo, J.; Mäkinen, P. Importance of the financial situation for the growth of a forest machine entrepreneur. Scand. J. For. Res. 2009, 24, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, S.; Dodson, B.; Greene, D.; Hayes, S. (Eds.) Evaluation of an Online National Survey of Timber Harvesting Contractors. In Proceedings of the 37th Council on Forest Engineering Annual Meeting, Moline, IL, USA, 22–25 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Blinn, C.R.; O’Hara, T.J.; Chura, D.T.; Russell, M.B. Minnesota’s Logging Businesses: An Assessment of the Health and Viability of the Sector. For. Sci. 2015, 61, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Milauskas, S.J.; Wang, J. West Virginia logger characteristics. For. Prod. J. 2006, 56, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Office of Management and Budget. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Revision for 2017. Available online: https://www.census.gov/naics/reference_files_tools/2017_NAICS_Manual.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2021).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. OES Data Overview. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm# (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Employment Statistics. Available online: www.bls.gov/oes/ (accessed on 26 December 2020).
- U.S. Census Bureau. Quarterly Workforce Indicators. 2019. Available online: https://qwiexplorer.ces.census.gov/static/explore.html#x=0&g=0 (accessed on 19 September 2020).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Handbook of Methods: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cew/home.htm (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages: One-Screen Data Search. Available online: https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/en (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/cew/ (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Timber Products Output Studies. Available online: https://www.fia.fs.fed.us/program-features/tpo/ (accessed on 20 January 2021).
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Timber Product Output (TPO) Reports, Knoxville, TN, 2019. Available online: http://srsfia2.fs.fed.us/php/tpo_2009/tpo_rpa_int1.php (accessed on 19 September 2020).
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Producer Price Index by NAICS Industry. Available online: https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/pc (accessed on 20 December 2020).
- Harrison, P.; Sharpe, A. A Detailed Analysis of the Productivity Performance of the Canadian Forest Products Sector Since 2000, Ottawa. 2009. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.660.1782&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 1 September 2020).
- Moulton, B.R. The Measurement of Output, Prices, and Productivity: What’s Changed Since the Boskin Commission? Available online: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-measurement-of-output-prices-and-productivity (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- Leontief, W. Input-Output Economics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1986; ISBN 0195365224. [Google Scholar]
- Norman, J.; Charpentier, A.D.; MacLean, H.L. Economic Input−Output Life-Cycle Assessment of Trade between Canada and the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Carnegie Mellon University. Theory and Method behind EIO-LCA. Available online: http://www.eiolca.net/Method/eio-lca-method.html (accessed on 6 January 2021).
- Khongprom, P.; Champanoi, S.; Suwanmanee, U. An Input-Output Approach for Environmental Life Cycle: Assessment of Cement Production. Chem. End. Trans. 2020, 81, 1345–1350. [Google Scholar]
- Carnegie Mellon University. Economic Results: Value Added Effects in Monetary Units. Available online: http://www.eiolca.net/Method/interp-results/econ_direct_percent.html (accessed on 6 January 2021).
- Goldstein, J.P.; Irland, L.C.; Senick, J.A.; Bassett, E.W. The Intergenerational Supply of Loggers under Conditions of Declining Economic Well-Being. Ind. Relations: A J. Econ. Soc. 2005, 44, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shivan, G.C.; Potter-Witter, K.; Blinn, C.R.; Rickenbach, M. The Logging Sector in the Lake States of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: Status, Issues, and Opportunities. J. For. 2020, 118, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Logging Workers. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/farming-fishing-and-forestry/logging-workers.htm (accessed on 8 December 2020).
- Egan, A. “The best workers they had”–le bûcheron québécois in Maine’s north woods. For. Chron. 2014, 90, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- O’Neal, B.; Shaffer, B. Hispanic Logging Worker Safety in the South; Technical Release 06-R-17; Forest Resources Association: Rockville, MD, USA, 2006; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neal, B.S. Safety Training for Spanish-Speaking Workers in the Logging Industry in the Southeastern United States. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Bruno, A. Immigration: Policy Considerations Related to Guest Worker Programs. Available online: https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL32044.html (accessed on 29 November 2021).
- Brodbeck IV, A.M. Immigrant Labor in the Forest Industry: The Impacts of H-2B Employment on Local Livelihoods. Ph.D. Thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Moseley, C.; Reyes, Y. Comparing job quality in logging and forestry services in Oregon. J. For. 2007, 105, 293–300. [Google Scholar]
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wages: 45-4021 Fallers. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes454021.htm#st (accessed on 17 March 2020).
- Wilson, J. The Job No One Wants: Why Won’t young People Work in Logging? Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/23/logging-industry-work-employment-oregon (accessed on 12 May 2021).
- Jodłowski, K.; Kalinowski, M. Current possibilities of mechanized logging in mountain areas. For. Res. Pap. 2018, 79, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Duduman, G.; Bouriaud, L. Managing innovations in wood harvesting and primary processing firms–case study of Suceava. For. Stud. 2007, 46, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
- Błuszkowska, U.; Nurek, T. Effect of mechanization level on manpower needs in forestry. Folia For. Pol. 2014, 56, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Penttinen, M.; Rummukainen, A.; Mikkola, J. Profitability, Liquidity and Solvency of Wood Harvesting Contractors in Finland. Small-Scale For. 2010, 10, 211–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carson, W.W. Is New Zealand ready for steep country logging? New Zealand J. For. 1983, 28, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
- Drapala, P. Decline in Housing Market Hits Forestry Industry Hard. Mississippi Agricultural News [Online]. 17 December 2009. Available online: https://extension.msstate.edu/news/feature-story/2009/decline-housing-market-hits-forestry-industry-hard?page=2 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
- Abbas, D.; Handler, R.; Hartsough, B.; Dykstra, D.; Lautala, P.; Hembroff, L. A survey analysis of forest harvesting and transportation operations in Michigan. Croat. J. For. Eng. J. Theory Appl. For. Eng. 2014, 35, 179–192. [Google Scholar]
- Rummukainen, A.; Brogt, T.; Kastenholz, E. Challenges for Forestry Contractors: Various Structures but Mutual Problems in Finland, Germany, Poland and Romania. In Issues Affecting Enterprise Development in the Forest Sector in Europe; Research Notes 169; Niskanen, A., Ed.; University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry: Joensuu, Finland, 2006; pp. 149–174. [Google Scholar]
- Carnegie Mellon University. Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment Model. Available online: http://www.eiolca.net (accessed on 1 November 2020).
- Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve Economic Data: New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started. Available online: Fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST# (accessed on 29 September 2021).
- Cubbage, F.W.; Stokes, B.J.; Granskog, J.E. Trends in southern forest harvesting equipment and logging costs. For. Prod. J. 1988, 32, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
- Spinelli, R.; Magagnotti, N.; Jessup, E.; Soucy, M. Perspectives and challenges of logging enterprises in the Italian Alps. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timber Update. All Timber Prices. Available online: https://timberupdate.com/timber-prices/ (accessed on 15 November 2020).
- Jacobson, M.; Finley, J.; Schmid, C. Factors and Trends in Pennsylvania’s Logging Industry; Hardwoods Development Council: Duncannon, PA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Barynin, P.; Taylor, D.; Ghouri, W.; Warth, C. Wood Supply Chain Analysis: Special Market Analysis Study; RISI: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.; Smidt, M.; Zhang, Y. Logging worker wage, performance, and experience. For. Prod. J. 2014, 64, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates: NAICS 113300—Logging. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/may/naics4_113300.htm (accessed on 1 September 2020).
- Costello, B.; Suarez, R. Truck Driver Shortage Analysis 2015; The American Trucking Associations: Arlington, VA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Egan, A.; Taggart, D. Who will log? Occupational choice and prestige in New England’s north woods. J. For. 2004, 102, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
- Regula, J.; Germain, R.; Bick, S.; Zhang, L. Assessing the Economic Viability of Loggers Operating Tree-Length Harvest Systems in the Northeast. J. For. 2018, 116, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Morgan, T.A.; Keegan, C.E.; Hayes, S.W.; Sorenson, C.B. Montana’s Forest Products Industry: 2013 Outlook. Available online: https://www.bber.umt.edu/pubs/forest/Outlook/forestproducts2015.pdf (accessed on 14 November 2021).
- Wang, S.; An, H. Technical change and productivity growth in the Alberta logging industry. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 102, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, S.; Greene, D.; Harris, T. Impact of Timber Sale Characteristics on Harvesting Costs. In Proceeding of the Southern Forest Economics Workshop, Charlotte, NC, USA, 15–17 March 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Taggart, D.; Egan, A. Logging across Borders and Cultures: An Example in Northern Maine. For. Prod. J. 2011, 61, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duc, N.M.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Smidt, M. Logging productivity and production function in Alabama, 1995 to 2000. For. Prod. J. 2009, 59, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
|Region||Total Employment, 1997 *||Total Employment, 2017||Total Growth of Employment (%)||Annual Growth of Employment (%)|
|Region||State||Report Year||Volume of Output||Value of Output||Hours Worked||Labor Productivity (Volume)||Labor Productivity (Value)|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
He, M.; Smidt, M.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y. Logging Industry in the United States: Employment and Profitability. Forests 2021, 12, 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121720
He M, Smidt M, Li W, Zhang Y. Logging Industry in the United States: Employment and Profitability. Forests. 2021; 12(12):1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121720Chicago/Turabian Style
He, Mingtao, Mathew Smidt, Wenying Li, and Yaoqi Zhang. 2021. "Logging Industry in the United States: Employment and Profitability" Forests 12, no. 12: 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121720