Next Article in Journal
Salicylic Acid Alleviated Salt Damage of Populus euphratica: A Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating Phylogeographic Analysis and Geospatial Methods to Infer Historical Dispersal Routes and Glacial Refugia of Liriodendron chinense
Previous Article in Journal
Local Users and Other Stakeholders’ Perceptions of the Identification and Prioritization of Ecosystem Services in Fragile Mountains: A Case Study of Chure Region of Nepal
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Conceptual Model for Forest Naturalness Assessment and Application in Quebec’s Boreal Forest
Open AccessArticle

Species-Area Relationship and Its Scale-Dependent Effects in Natural Forests of North Eastern China

by Beibei Chen 1,2, Jun Jiang 1,2,* and Xiuhai Zhao 1,2
Forestry School, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Research Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(5), 422;
Received: 15 April 2019 / Revised: 13 May 2019 / Accepted: 14 May 2019 / Published: 15 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity Conservation in Managed Forests)
The Species-area relationship is one of the core issues in community ecology and an important basis for scale transformation of biodiversity. However, the effect of scale on this relationship, together with the selection of an optimal species-area model for different sampling methods, is still controversial. This study is based on the data from two sampling areas of 40 km2 in size, one in a Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc) broad-leaved mixed forest in Mt. Changbai and the other in Jiaohe, Jilin Province. The logarithmic, power, and logistic model were established on a scale of 10 km2, 20 km2, and 30 km2, respectively, using a nested sampling plot and random sampling plot. The goodness of the species-area model was tested by the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The results show that the sampling method affected the relationship between species and area, and the data were fitted better under random sampling compared with nested sampling. The construction of the relationship between species and area was closely related to the upper limit of the sampling area size. On a small scale (10 km2), the data were fitted best with the logarithmic and logistic model, whereas the logistic model was the best fit on a medium (20 km2) and large scale (30 km2). We evaluated the scale dependence of species-area relationship in two forests with nested and random sampling methods. We further showed that the logistic model based on the random sampling plot can explain most soundly the species-area relationship in Jiaohe and Mt. Changbai. More studies are needed in other regions to develop models to optimize sampling designs for different forest types under different density constraints at different spatial scales, and for a more accurate estimation of forest dynamics under long-term observations. View Full-Text
Keywords: species-area relationship; sampling; goodness-of-fit; scale-dependent; diversity species-area relationship; sampling; goodness-of-fit; scale-dependent; diversity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, B.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, X. Species-Area Relationship and Its Scale-Dependent Effects in Natural Forests of North Eastern China. Forests 2019, 10, 422.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop