Next Article in Journal
Introduction to the Special Issue on Tropical Forests: Management and Ecology in the Anthropocene
Previous Article in Journal
The Dual Method Approach (DMA) Resolves Measurement Range Limitations of Heat Pulse Velocity Sap Flow Sensors
Open AccessArticle

Assessing Forest Governance in the Countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion

1
RECOFTC—The Center for People and Forests, Bangkok 10903, Thailand
2
Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
3
WWF-Netherlands, 3708 Zeist, The Netherlands
4
WWF-US, Washington, DC 20037, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010047
Received: 24 October 2018 / Revised: 20 December 2018 / Accepted: 5 January 2019 / Published: 10 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science)
The forest landscapes of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) are changing dramatically, with a multitude of impacts from local to global levels. These changes invariably have their foundations in forest governance. The aim of this paper is to assess perceptions of key stakeholders regarding the state of forest governance in the countries of the GMS. The work is based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the perceptions of forest governance in the five GMS countries, involving 762 representatives from government, civil society, news media, and rural communities. The work identified many challenges to good forest governance in the countries in the region, as well as noting reasons for optimism. Generally speaking, there was a feeling that the policies, legislation, and institutional frameworks were supportive, but there are numerous challenges in terms of implementation, enforcement, and compliance. The work also presents a program of activities recommended by the research participants to address governance challenges and opportunities in the GMS countries. These include the development of a forest governance monitoring system, and initiatives that support informed decision-making by forest product consumers in the region as well as the implementation of a capacity development program for non-state actors (e.g., civil society, news media) to ensure they are more able to support the diverse, and often demanding, forest governance initiatives. View Full-Text
Keywords: forest governance; Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS); civil society; deforestation; illegal logging and trade; FLEGT VPA; REDD+ forest governance; Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS); civil society; deforestation; illegal logging and trade; FLEGT VPA; REDD+
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gritten, D.; Lewis, S.R.; Breukink, G.; Mo, K.; Thuy, D.T.T.; Delattre, E. Assessing Forest Governance in the Countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion. Forests 2019, 10, 47.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop