Next Article in Journal
Diagnosing Schizophrenia Using Effective Connectivity of Resting-State EEG Data
Previous Article in Journal
KDAS-ReID: Architecture Search for Person Re-Identification via Distilled Knowledge with Dynamic Temperature
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Bayesian Nonparametric Learning Approach to Ensemble Models Using the Proper Bayesian Bootstrap
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue on “Bayesian Networks: Inference Algorithms, Applications, and Software Tools”

by
Daniele Codetta-Raiteri
Computer Science Institute, Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
Algorithms 2021, 14(5), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/a14050138
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 22 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
In the field of Artificial Intelligence, Bayesian Networks (BN) [1] are a well-known framework for reasoning under uncertain knowledge. BNs have been applied in a wide range of real-world domains, such as medical diagnosis, forensic analysis, dependability assessment, risk management, etc. With respect to other types of models, BNs provide relevant advantages: at the modelling level, the compact representation of the joint distribution of the system variables leads to the factorization of the set of possible states, avoiding the generation of the complete state space of the system; at the analysis level, inference algorithms can compute the probability distribution of any variable, possibly conditioned on the observation of the value (state) of other variables, so that predictive and diagnostic measures can be easily evaluated. During the years, BNs have been extended in order to increase their modelling and analysis power; for instance, Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) and Continuous-Time Bayesian Networks take time into account, Hybrid Bayesian Networks deal with both discrete and continuous variables, Decision Networks (DN) contain decision nodes and value nodes.
This Special Issue covers a range of case studies examined by means of BNs and their extensions. DBNs are exploited for the risk assessment of a nuclear reactor in [2]. This infrastructure belongs to the class of Complex Engineering Systems (CES) and DBNs enable the forward and backward inference of system states, diagnosing current system health, and forecasting future system prognosis. Simulated accident sequence data are used as evidence during DBN inference; the results can serve as a training tool for CES operators to better prepare for accident scenarios. Autonomous vehicles, taking the environmental context into account, are another application field documented in [3], where BNs help in Fault Detection Isolation and Recovery (FDIR) in real-time conditions. The models are automatically generated from Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and operate online for autonomous vehicles. Then, in the safe mission planning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), DNs are experimented as decision-making models; several realistic examples show the benefits.
A BN can be constructed by means of parameter and structure learning from data, as discussed in [4]. When data are incomplete, learning is usually implemented with the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm computing the relevant sufficient statistics by belief propagation, or with the Structural Expectation-Maximization (Structural EM) algorithm building the network structure from those sufficient statistics. Since practical implementations often impute missing data to compute sufficient statistics, the impact of using imputation instead of belief propagation, is investigated on the quality of the resulting BNs. Given synthetic data, reference BNs, and several scenarios, the better approach is recommended according to the characteristics of the data. As a result, a Decision Tree (DT) is built to guide practitioners in choosing the EM algorithm.
Another work about machine learning is presented in [5] and deals with the problem of traffic barrier crashes, with the goal of identifying and optimizing the heights of the barriers, based on the monetary saving and the reduction of frequency and severity of crashes. The paper presents an empirical cost-benefit analysis based on Bayesian hierarchical machine learning technique, where a hierarchical model is employed to provide a flexible way of addressing the problem. This work is extended in [6] where Finite Mixture Model (FMM) is used to find the distribution parameters characterizing the observation dataset. FMM accuracy may be compromised by several problems affecting data, like overdispersion, heterogeneity, loss of information. Thus a new methodology called Bayesian Hierarchical Finite Mixture, is implemented, where the FMM parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood technique.
Bootstrap resampling techniques, approximating statistical distributions, are presented in a general Bayesian framework in [7]. Several bootstrap techniques are used and compared in predictive classification and regression models based on ensemble approaches, i.e. bagging models involving DTs. In particular, Proper Bayesian bootstrap is used to sample the posterior distribution over trees, introducing prior distributions on the covariates and the target variable. The results obtained on simulated and real data, are compared with respect to other competitive procedures employing different bootstrap techniques.
In summary, this Special Issue covers aspects like learning BN structure and parameters from data, and the utilization of BN modeling and analysis for monitoring, fault diagnosis and future state prediction of safety-critical systems like power plants and autonomous vehicles. Besides BNs, the Special Issue collects works about Bayesian approaches for data analysis, such as machine learning and FMM (both applied to traffic barrier crashes), or bootstrap resampling techniques. We hope that these articles help us advance in our understanding of the capabilities of BNs and Bayesian methods, in particular when exploited for risk and reliability assessment of infrastructures characterized by dependability requirements.

Funding

This work is original and has a financial support of the Università del Piemonte Orientale.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BNBayesian Network
CESComplex Engineering System
DBNDynamic Bayesian Network
DNDecision Network
DTDecision Tree
EMExpectation-Maximization
FDIRFault Detection Isolation and Recovery
FMEAFailure Mode and Effects Analysis
FMMFinite Mixture Model
UAVUnmanned Aerial Vehicle

References

  1. Portinale, L.; Codetta-Raiteri, D. Modeling and Analysis of Dependable Systems: A Probabilistic Graphical Model Perspective; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis, A.D.; Groth, K.M. A Dynamic Bayesian Network Structure for Joint Diagnostics and Prognostics of Complex Engineering Systems. Algorithms 2020, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dezan, C.; Zermani, S.; Hireche, C. Embedded Bayesian Network Contribution for a Safe Mission Planning of Autonomous Vehicles. Algorithms 2020, 13, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruggieri, A.; Stranieri, F.; Stella, F.; Scutari, M. Hard and Soft EM in Bayesian Network Learning from Incomplete Data. Algorithms 2020, 13, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rezapour, M.; Ksaibati, K. Two-Component Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Traffic Barrier Crash Count. Algorithms 2020, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rezapour, M.; Ksaibati, K. Application of Bayesian Hierarchical Negative Binomial Finite Mixture Model for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Barriers Optimization, Accounting for Severe Heterogeneity. Algorithms 2020, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Galvani, M.; Bardelli, C.; Figini, S.; Muliere, P. A Bayesian Nonparametric Learning Approach to Ensemble Models Using the Proper Bayesian Bootstrap. Algorithms 2021, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Codetta-Raiteri, D. Editorial for the Special Issue on “Bayesian Networks: Inference Algorithms, Applications, and Software Tools”. Algorithms 2021, 14, 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14050138

AMA Style

Codetta-Raiteri D. Editorial for the Special Issue on “Bayesian Networks: Inference Algorithms, Applications, and Software Tools”. Algorithms. 2021; 14(5):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14050138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Codetta-Raiteri, Daniele. 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Bayesian Networks: Inference Algorithms, Applications, and Software Tools”" Algorithms 14, no. 5: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14050138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop