Next Article in Journal
First-Principles Investigation of the Effects of B-Type Medium Entropy Local Sublattice on the Physical Properties of ABX3 (A = K, Ag, Cu; B = SixGeySnzPb(1−xyz); X = Br, I) Metal Halide Perovskites
Next Article in Special Issue
Vari Morph Cast Iron—A High IQ Material—Structure, Properties, Ultrasonic Control, Technology and Industrial Application
Previous Article in Journal
Electrical Potential and Cell Immobilisation Capacity of a Laser-Treated Titanium Alloy Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Topography and Corrosion Resistance Characteristics of Fe40Al5Cr0.2ZrB Alloy and X18CrN28 Steel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of the Application of Five-, Seven- and Nine-Roll Sheet Straightening Using Numerical Tools

1
Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, 19 Armii Krajowej Av., 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
2
Serwistal Sp. z. o.o., 2A Dojazdowa Str., 19-300 Ełk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2026, 19(6), 1053; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061053
Submission received: 5 November 2025 / Revised: 2 March 2026 / Accepted: 4 March 2026 / Published: 10 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Achievements in Foundry Materials and Technologies)

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a numerical analysis of the roller straightening process. The study evaluated straightening systems consisting of 5, 7, and 9 rollers. The assessment was based on real data obtained under industrial conditions. The research involved the use of two widely used structural steel grades, namely S235JR and S500MC. As part of the study, an analysis of the anisotropy of sheet properties within the coil volume was also conducted. Additionally, the surface topography of the sheets was analyzed and subsequently used in the numerical simulations. The inclusion of real data regarding both material anisotropy and actual geometry allowed for an increase in calculation accuracy. Furthermore, investigations were carried out to analyze the method of implementing material data into the mathematical model. The work also analyzed the accuracy of the obtained numerical results based on material data from the traditional method of introducing material information in the form of an approximated curve. Numerical studies confirmed by a physical test developed by the authors, which can be easily implemented in industrial conditions, confirmed the research assumptions and literature data. The main advantage of the presented solutions is their relative ease of implementation and use in manufacturing facilities with limited research facilities.

1. Introduction

The production of sheet metal in the form of flat sheets, used as feedstock for processes such as laser cutting or press forming, requires several technological stages resulting from the fact that the material is delivered in coils. Sheet metal coils offer undeniable advantages, such as easier transportation. However, after uncoiling, the sheets exhibit waviness and non-uniform residual stress levels both across their cross-section and along their length. This is, among other things, a remnant of the rolling and coiling process, commonly referred to as the “coil memory,” which contributes to the formation of geometric defects and increased, uneven distributions of residual stresses [1,2,3].
Producing high-quality sheets requires identifying the defects that occur after uncoiling as well as after preliminary straightening in a roller straightener. An important aspect is the evaluation of sheet flatness after uncoiling, before preliminary straightening in roller straighteners, since at this stage it is crucial to eliminate a significant portion of geometric defects and reduce the level of residual stresses, which will subsequently affect the residual stress state during tension straightening [4,5,6].
Implementing any improvements in the straightening process requires determining the initial geometry of the sheet. The most characteristic defects found in cold-rolled and hot-rolled sheets include longitudinal bowing, transverse bowing, edge waviness, and center waviness. A schematic view of these defects is shown in Figure 1.
The characteristics of the technological process of producing flat products, particularly in the finishing rolling stage, are closely related to the non-uniform deformation occurring in the roll gap. At the exit of the rolling mill, the transverse contour of the strip is uneven, which is the main cause of residual stresses along its length. In the case of a convex contour, compressive stresses occur at the edges of the sheet, while tensile stresses develop in the center. If these stresses exceed the critical buckling strength of the strip, edge deformation may occur in the form of waviness or cyclic bulging in the central part of the strip, resulting from partial stress relaxation.
An additional source of stress during rolling is deformation caused by coiling and uncoiling of the strip, as well as by uneven cooling of the coiled sheet during hot rolling. As a result of all these technological processes [4,5,8], a complex residual stress state exists in the sheet strip, leading to shape deformations that must be removed to ensure the semi-finished product meets quality requirements [9,10].
Many authors [11,12,13] have studied the possibilities of using roller systems to reduce residual stresses. For particular note is the study [11], in which the authors used numerical tools to model straightening in multi-roller systems. This is important because such systems offer great flexibility for eliminating many types of defects. The defects shown in Figure 1 can be significantly reduced or even completely eliminated [14,15,16] through roller straightening, especially when combined with tension straightening. However, it is necessary to identify the type and magnitude of defects after uncoiling in order to choose the appropriate straightening methodology (in the case of a preliminary roller straightener—to determine the correct roller positions).
In addition to visible geometric defects, sheets also exhibit “hidden defects” in the form of residual stresses [17,18,19], which, when too high, can cause deformation—particularly during cutting. Such defects can be eliminated during the tensioning process. Their origin lies in non-uniform rolling conditions, and in the case of hot-rolled sheets, additional factors such as temperature non-uniformity further contribute to their formation. Uneven temperature distribution in the sheet leads to residual stresses, which often affect sheet geometry as well.
However, in order to apply the appropriate straightening method [20,21,22] (in the case of a roller straightener—proper roller positioning), it is necessary to determine the type and magnitude of defects after uncoiling.
Excellent results in process design, acceleration, and cost reduction in research can be achieved through the use of numerical tools, such as the finite element method (FEM). Many authors, including the authors of this paper, have used FEM-based tools to solve similar problems [23,24,25].
It is evident that internal stresses, which in the described case are a primary source of geometric defects, result from manufacturing processes. Many authors, in their works regarding stresses across various product groups, have described both their effects on properties or microstructure [26,27,28] and on defects, such as surface irregularities [29,30,31]. Another element to be considered in the field of internal stresses is their origin resulting from heat or thermomechanical treatment [32,33,34]. The observed effects—manifesting as changes in properties, microstructural non-homogeneity, delamination, and cracking—are unfavorable.
In industrial conditions, particularly on production lines dedicated to formatting sheet metal into sheets for further production, it is impossible to fully investigate stress distribution directions or determine their root causes. Therefore, it is crucial to develop solutions that allow for their reduction in a relatively universal manner. In this study, the authors focused on the analysis of such a production line; consequently, the origin of the stresses, regardless of its nature, was not the primary evaluation criterion. Among the most commonly used industrial techniques for reducing internal stress states are technologies utilizing multi-roller systems. The research presented in this paper is part of a much larger project, the results of which led to significant positive outcomes, namely the reduction in geometric defects in metal sheets. The multi-roller system itself, while critical, was only one component of this solution, which constitutes the intellectual property of Serwistal and is legally protected; therefore, it is not possible to present all elements of the production line.

2. Research Material and Preliminary Tests

The material used for the study consisted of sheets uncoiled from coils made of structural steels S235JR + AR and S500MC. The selection of research materials was driven by the fact that these two steel grades account for a significant share of Serwistal’s current production. Another important consideration was that both materials were subjected to similar finishing treatments. Both steels were in the hot-rolled condition and can be subjected to an annealing process after rolling; however, to reduce production costs, they are typically rolled into coils without additional heat treatment. During hot rolling, the rolls are cooled with water, and in most cases, the edges of the sheet cool faster than the central part, which may lead to differences in properties between the central and edge regions. Neither the microstructure nor the material texture was analyzed within this work or in the project (POIR.01.01.01-00-0477/18). Such analyses are not feasible under industrial conditions; furthermore, the material manufacturer is responsible for both the quality of the microstructure and the chemical composition. This work presents results that can be obtained quite quickly and easily in industrial conditions. The chemical composition of the tested steels, determined using spark spectroscopy, is presented in Table 1.
As part of the first stage of the research, the anisotropy of the material properties was evaluated. The tests were carried out using Vickers hardness measurements with a Matsuzawa Via S hardness tester (Matsuzawa, Akita, Japan) and a static tensile test using an MTS E45.305 testing machine (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN, USA).
Hardness test samples were taken from six areas of the coil—the beginning (b), middle (m), and end (e). Assuming symmetry of properties across the sheet width, the number of samples in the transverse direction was limited to two—one taken from the edge and one from the center of the strip. The areas from which hardness samples were taken covered the same zones of the beginning, middle and end of the coil that were examined later in the article. These locations were selected because the literature data, observations from sheet metal manufacturer Serwistal (Ełk, Poland), and preliminary studies indicated that these areas differ significantly in surface geometry. Additionally, as also presented in works [4,5], it was determined that these places are characterized by significant unevenness in internal stresses. Table 2 presents the sample identification and the corresponding area of the sheet (edge or center) from which each specimen was taken, while Table 3 and Table 4 show the measured results obtained.
The obtained data indicate that the greatest differences in values were recorded at the beginning and end areas of the coil. These differences were observed regardless of the steel grade, which is closely related to the rolling process technology. Hot-rolled sheets exhibited greater hardness non-uniformity across the strip width, with differences reaching up to 9.7%.
The analysis of the anisotropy of mechanical properties aimed not only to investigate the hypothesis regarding significant differences between individual areas of the ring, but also to determine the extent of these differences. Only this knowledge allowed for an assessment of the feasibility of numerical studies and the identification of necessary simplifications. This is particularly crucial because, while incorporating the actual geometry of an object into numerical tools is a relatively straightforward task, implementing significant anisotropy is essentially impossible or nearly so. The use of relatively simple tests, such as hardness and static tensile testing, served a dual purpose. Firstly, these tests are feasible under production conditions; secondly, they give a clear result. As will be explained further in this paper, the development of a tabular material model—as the most effective method for defining material anisotropy parameters—enabled its implementation in numerical research. Due to the fact that during the implementation of project POIR.01.01.01-00-0477/18, a sheet metal straightening system was designed and developed based on two components consisting of a preliminary multi-roller leveler and a final tension leveler, knowledge regarding the non-uniformity of mechanical properties in the longitudinal direction was essential. The multi-roller straightening system presented in this work served as a preliminary stress relief stage. Since this stage is important but not the primary factor, the research was simplified to focus solely on longitudinal properties. Consequently, it was possible to introduce a simplification by limiting the study to the investigation of properties in the longitudinal direction. By combining the roller system with the final tension stage, it is possible to orient the stresses and ultimately obtain high-quality products characterized by the absence of surface defects. Related studies [4,5] provide additional data on this project, specifically regarding stress states measured using the Barkhausen noise method.
Subsequently, tensile tests were carried out to determine the actual anisotropy of mechanical properties (Ys—yield strength; UTS—ultimate tensile strength). The samples used for testing at room temperature are shown in Figure 2.
The sampling locations included the beginning, middle, and end of the coil—both from the central part of the sheet and near its side edges. Three samples were prepared from each location. The results are presented in Table 4 and Table 5.
The data presented in Table 4 and Table 5 show that the greatest differences in yield strength and tensile strength values—regardless of the steel grade—were observed across the sheet width at the beginning and end of the coil. This results from the rolling process technology. The differences across the width reached nearly 10%, while smaller variations, up to about 6%, were observed along the coil length.
For accurate numerical modeling, it was necessary to adopt a certain degree of data homogenization. To achieve this, the obtained values were averaged. Due to the significant number of samples intended for testing, dedicated computer software was developed to enable automatic numerical analysis of the collected data. The data, initially stored as text files, were processed into a structured table containing the essential parameters required to generate flow stress curves for each steel grade. Additionally, the results were averaged within each steel grade category.
Figure 3 presents examples of flow stress curves obtained for the selected steel grades, while Table 6 shows their averaged characteristics.
For the obtained curves, an exponential function was fitted using the developed computer program, as it most accurately represented the experimental data. An analysis of different forms of exponential functions, varying in the number of coefficients, showed that the four-parameter exponential function provided the best fit to the actual curve behavior. The function takes the following form:
σ f = K ε m 1 e x p m 2 ε e x p ε m 3 , [ MPa ]
The obtained flow stress curves were then subjected to numerical analysis using the developed software. A least-squares approximation was performed using a four-parameter quadratic exponential function dependent on strain, which made it possible to determine the coefficients of function (1): K, m1, m2, and m3. The applied method for determining the function coefficients minimizes the deviation error between the fitted function and the actual flow stress curves. Table 3 presents the coefficients of function (1) for the selected steel grades.
The developed mathematical model of flow stress enables computer simulations of sheet behavior using a deformable body model in an elasto-plastic state. The elastic state is represented by Young’s modulus, while the deformation range beyond the yield point is described by the flow stress function.
The final stage of the preliminary research involved analyzing the geometry of the selected sheets using 3D laser scanning. These tests were carried out with a Creaform MetraSCAN 3D optical-laser scanner (AMETEK Inc. Lévis, AC, Canada), used together with the C-Track tracking system, enables precise measurement of components. In combination with the HandyPROBE (AMETEK Inc. Lévis, QC, Canada) measuring device, sheet scanning within a range of 1 to 10 m is possible. An example view of the scanning process is shown in Figure 4, while the obtained sheet surface geometries are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Based on the conducted scans, it was possible to determine the geometric parameters of the examined sheets and subsequently create the actual geometries to be used as input material for FEM simulations. An example view of the prepared simulation file is shown in Figure 7.

3. Validation of the Mathematical Model of the Material Database

The mathematical model—material database—is one of the key elements for correctly performing numerical simulations [35,36,37]. Many authors point out that the accuracy of calculations based on plasticity curves is insufficient [36,37,38], and standard models are increasingly replaced with multi-parameter curves [29,39,40,41]; however, this approach is not always adequate. Therefore, as part of the work related to modeling the reduction in internal stresses and defects in uncoiled sheet metal, it was necessary to carry out validation of the obtained material model.
As part of the model verification, a comparison was made between the actual flow stress curves and those generated numerically based on Equation (1) and the coefficients listed in Table 7. Figure 8 presents an example of such a comparison for steel grade S235JR + AR. In Table 8 is presented the geometric parameters of the sheet waviness measurement for the selected steel grades using the 3D laser scanning method after uncoiling.
By analyzing the course of stress changes as a function of strain, it can be observed that discrepancies occur between the curve determined during experimental tests and the curve obtained by approximating the results of static tensile tests. This is particularly noticeable in the region where the material transitions into the plastic state (the area marked with an arrow and enlarged). An imprecise mathematical description of the flow stress value (σf) may be one of the causes of significant numerical errors during tensile test simulations (determination of the range of plastic deformation). To reduce the discrepancies between the approximated and the actual results, it is necessary to introduce the flow stress values in a tabular form, without approximating the static tensile test results. When constructing such a table, it should be assumed that the accuracy of the flow stress values after approximation depends on the number of input data points for the actual strain and stress σf values. Reading the flow stress values for real strain increments equal to 0.05 may, in some strain ranges, result in underestimated σp values due to the adopted computational step size. Based on the obtained results of static tensile tests for individual steel grades, tabular forms of the flow stress were developed, as shown in Figure 9.
Based on the obtained data for the flow stress region, the differences between the experimental and simulation results were determined for two variants: one using the flow stress function and the other using the tabular form of the flow stress. The values of the relative percentage differences are presented in Table 9.
As can be observed, the obtained differences in stress values fall within the range of 0.63–2.35%, which indicates that the proposed testing procedure is highly accurate and can be applied to determine the range of forces and elongations. The developed mathematical model of flow stress enables computer simulation of the sheet metal using a model of the deformable object in the elastic–plastic state. The elastic state is represented by Young’s modulus, while the deformation range beyond the yield point is implemented using the actual values taken from the table. This is particularly important when testing at ambient temperature. In such cases, models using approximation curves exhibit greater error in the area of elastic and small plastic strains.

4. Numerical Analysis of Sheet Straightening in a Roll Straightener

As part of the research continuing the work presented in [4], computer simulations of the straightening process were carried out using a roll straightener equipped with 5 rolls with a diameter of 200 mm, and 7 and 9 rolls with a diameter of 160 mm. The study was conducted using the software ForgeNxT®. The simulation used the rigid bodies model for the tools, this simplification was used because the aim of this research was the selection of roll pre-leveler parameters to ensure the removal of so-called “coil memory”, reducing waviness (geometry defects). The 5-roll straightener is treated as the reference model. Numerical modeling of the sheet metal rolling process is a challenging task, primarily due to geometric factors—specifically the high width-to-thickness ratio. For the calculations, an elasto-plastic model of the deformed material was applied, disregarding the influence of strain rate. Material properties were determined based on tensile tests; the resulting tensile curves were converted into stress–strain curves and implemented as constitutive data. From the perspective of sheet straightening, properties in the longitudinal direction are of paramount importance. The strip geometry, obtained through 3D scanning, was introduced as a boundary condition. Contact between the material and the rollers was defined using the Coulomb friction model. Due to the unfavorable thickness-to-width ratio, the analysis of stress–strain states was performed using localized mesh refinement. These areas were kept small to allow for a finite element mesh dense enough to ensure sufficiently accurate results. The computer simulation of the leveling process was carried out with the use of an elastoplastic model in the triaxial state of strain by using the ForgeNxT® v2.1 Transvalor program, whereas the properties of the deformed material were described according to the Norton–Hoff [42,43] conservation law. The application of the computer program ForgeNxT® using the thermo-mechanical models that it contains requires the definition of boundary conditions, which are decisive to the correctness of numerical computation. The theoretical analysis was performed for the following conditions: friction coefficient, µ—0.15 (according to the ForgeNxT® v2.1 Transvalor database and [44]); sheet temperature—20 °C; Poisson coefficient—0.3, leveling velocity 45 m/min., number of elements 210,000; specific heat—480 J/(kg·K); density—7850 kg/m3; conductivity—29.9 W/(m·K). Figure 10 presents the diagrams of the roll straighteners and the models used for the simulations.
Due to the complexity of the results, the data are presented in two ways: as projections of stress intensity distributions (Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13) and as side views, which also allow for a better assessment of the cross-sectional geometry. Due to the fact that the present work was carried out as part of a larger project and some of the results were presented, among others, in [4], the authors will not duplicate the results.
In the following part of the study, the results are presented in a side view. This approach also made it possible to evaluate the geometry of the strip. Figure 14 shows a view of the areas (measuring points) in which measurement data were collected. To limit the graphical data in this article, the results from the measurement points are presented in Table 10. The mesh was selected in such a way that when the box option was used, compaction occurred in the areas of contact with the rollers. This mesh densification approach not only accelerated calculations but, more importantly, improved their quality.
Based on the data shown in Figure 14 and Table 10, it can be observed that the values of stress intensity and strain intensity, similarly to the seven-roll straightener, increase in the areas where the straightened sheet contacts the rolls, and then decrease in the free-forming regions of the sheet between consecutive rolls. However, when using the nine-roll straightener, the increase in stress and strain within the straightened sheet is much more gradual—both compared to the currently used five-roll straightener and the newly designed seven-roll straightener. Analysis of the obtained numerical simulation results showed that for the remaining components of stress and strain, the distributions are similar to those obtained for the seven-roll straightener, but the nature of their variation becomes smoother due to the addition of an extra pair of rolls. An important observation is the increase in plastic deformation through the thickness of the straightened sheet as a result of adding more straightening rolls. Therefore, increasing the number of rolls in this case is fully justified. Interesting distributions were obtained for the elastic and plastic strain intensities. While the plastic strain intensity decreases as the sheet moves between subsequent rolls—which is a natural consequence of smaller deflections of the following rolls—the elastic strain intensity increases as the sheet passes through successive rolls. This indicates that the plastic deformation in the subsequent bending zones of the sheet has an increasingly smaller effect, and thus the sheet begins to deform mainly within the elastic range. A similar relationship was noted for the total strain in the straightened sheet, which is plastically deformed. However, in the case of the nine-roll straightener, plastic deformations are distributed over the first seven rolls, where the total strain reaches its highest and most intense values (as a sum of elastic and plastic strains), and then decreases sharply in the last two rolls, where the sheet is deformed only elastically.
In summary, the results of the numerical calculations for the five-roll straightener and the seven- and nine-roll straighteners indicate that increasing the number of rolls positively affects the plasticization of the sheet. The plasticization process becomes smoother, and increasing the number of rolls to nine improves the straightness of the sheet and enhances the reduction in residual stresses—one of the main objectives of using a preliminary multi-roll straightener. Due to the fact that, based on numerical data, it was determined that the most effective system was one containing nine rollers for physical testing, such a system was selected. As mentioned, the research was conducted with an industrial partner, and therefore, one of the goals was to develop inspection tools suitable for such conditions. For this purpose, an original tool was developed in the form of a specially prepared laser-cut sheet of metal. A sample view is presented in Figure 15, and the results of measurements performed with commonly available engineering tools are presented in Table 11 and Figure 16.
The choice of the method for assessing the state of internal stresses was based on the assumption that a material with trapped stresses in its volume will lead to their release and change in geometry. An easy and clear comparison result is the deflection measurement shown in the data in Table 10.

5. Conclusions

The numerical studies carried out demonstrated a high sensitivity of the input parameters to the obtained results. The validation of the mathematical model of the material database, combined with the integration of tabular data and real data from sheet surface scans, made it possible to achieve highly accurate results. Based on the obtained research findings, the following statements and conclusions can be formulated:
  • The anisotropy of the examined sheets, determined both by hardness measurements and static tensile tests, is evident. Therefore, for proper numerical analyses, it is essential to average the real material properties based on the obtained data.
  • To perform computer simulations with higher computational accuracy, it was necessary to transition from a material model based on the flow curve equation to a tabular form of data.
  • The incorporation of real sheet geometries, correlated with actual anisotropy properties, allowed for a high degree of accuracy in the obtained research results.
  • In the case of the nine-roll straightener, plastic deformations are distributed over the first seven rolls; total deformations reach their highest and most intense values (as a sum of elastic and plastic strains), and then decrease sharply in the last two rolls, where the sheet is deformed only within the elastic range.
  • On the base of numerical simulation it can be stated that use of a nine-roll configuration has a positive effect on the sheet straightening capability.
  • The proprietary method of analyzing the state of internal stresses enables a quick and rough assessment that can be applied in industrial conditions.
  • The measurements of real materials showed some differences between the tested steel grades and confirmed that the use of a nine-roll straightening system significantly reduces the stress on the material.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M., P.S., T.G. and G.S.; methodology, S.M., P.S. and J.G.; formal analysis, S.M., G.S. and R.G.; data curation, S.M., P.S. and G.S.; investigation, S.M., P.S., T.G., G.S., J.G. and R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M., P.S. and T.G.; writing—review and editing, S.M., J.G. and R.G.; visualization, S.M., P.S. and G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Center for Research and Development (NCBiR), grant no. POIR.01.01.01-00-0477/18.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Jakub Gróbarczyk and Radosław Gryczkowski were employed by the company Serwistal Sp. z. o.o. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hidveghy, J.; Michel, J.; Bursak, M. Residual Stress in Microaloyed Steel Sheet. Metalurgija 2003, 42, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abvabi, A. Effect of Residual Stresses in Roll Forming Process of Metal Sheets. Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhalaybeh, T.S.; Akhtar, H.; Chowdhury, A.I.; Lou, Y. Anisotropic Hardening of HC420 Steel Sheet: Experiments and Analytical Modeling. Metals 2025, 15, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mróz, S.; Szota, P.; Garstka, T.; Stradomski, G.; Gróbarczyk, J.; Gryczkowski, R. The Selection of Leveler Parameters Using FEM Simulation. Materials 2024, 17, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Garstka, T.; Szota, P.; Mróz, S.; Stradomski, G.; Gróbarczyk, J.; Gryczkowski, R. Calibration Method of Measuring Heads for Testing Residual Stresses in Sheet Metal Using the Barkhausen Method. Materials 2024, 17, 4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeon, Y.; Jeong, K.; Kim, G.-h.; Yoon, J. 1.5 GPa Grade High-Strength Steel Sheet Flattening by Roll Gap Adjustment Considering Pattern Roll Effects. Materials 2025, 18, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Available online: https://www.arku.com/pl/blog/jak-wyeliminowac-defekty-w-blasze (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  8. Dömling, F.; Paysan, F.; Breitbarth, E. Numerical Simulations of Stress Intensity Factors and Fatigue Life in L-Shaped Sheet Profiles. Metals 2024, 14, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mroziński, S.; Golański, G.; Jagielska-Wiaderek, K.; Szarek, A. Impact of Microstructural Anisotropy on the Low-Cycle Fatigue of S420M Steel. Materials 2025, 18, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roh, Y.-H.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.-E.; Kim, S.-G.; Lee, Y. Development and Validation of a Large Strain Flow Curve Model for High-Silicon Steel to Predict Roll Forces in Cold Rolling. Machines 2025, 13, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Perzynski, K.; Pyzynski, K.; Swierczynski, S.; Pidvysots’kyy, V.; Klis, J.; Madej, L. Influence of the roll leveler setup parameters on the quality of high-strength steel leveling operation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 120, 1203–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liao, T.W. A new curvature analytical method in plate leveling process. ISIJ Int. 2018, 58, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Smith, R.P. The effect of the number of leveling rolls on the straightening process. Iron Steel Technol. 2007, 4, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  14. Keecheol, P.; Kyungsuk, O. Effect of the Leveling Conditions on Residual Stress Evolution of Hot Rolled High Strength Steels for Cold Forming. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 896, 012117. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brautigam, H.; Becker, S. Leveling with Roller Levelers; ARKU Maschinenbau GmbH: Baden-Baden, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, W. Mechanism of lateral metal flow on residual stress distribution during hot strip rolling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 288, 116838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Li, X.; Chen, J. Overview on the Prediction Models for Sheet Metal Forming Failure: Necking and Ductile Fracture. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 2018, 31, 259–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cazacu, O. New Yield Criteria for Isotropic and Textured Metallic Materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2018, 139–140, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Richard, P.; Smith, J. Modeling Plastic Strain During Cold Leveling of Steel Plates. In Proceedings of the AISE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 10–12 May 1999. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gruber, M.; Hirt, G. A strategy for the controlled setting of flatness and residual stress distribution in sheet metals via roller leveling. Proc. Eng. 2017, 207, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Behrens, B.-A.; El Nadi, T.; Krimm, R. Development of an analytical 3D-simulation model of the levelling process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2011, 211, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Widmark, M.; Melander, A.; Meurling, F. Low cycle constant amplitude fully reversed strain-controlled testing of low carbon and stainless sheet steels for simulation of straightening operations. Int. J. Fatigue 2000, 22, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pietrzyk, M.; Madej, L.; Rauch, L.; Szeliga, D. Computational Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Frederick, C.O.; Armstrong, P.J. A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect. Mater. High Temp. 2007, 24, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, J.-B.; Kang, S.-S. Numerical modeling of roller leveler for thick plate leveling. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2018, 19, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wiewiórowska, S.; Siemiński, M.; Śleboda, T.; Dyl, T.; Koczurkiewicz, B. Determination of Two-Stage Heat Treatment Parameters in Industrial Conditions in Order to Obtain a TRIP Structure in Low-Alloy Carbon Steel Wires. Materials 2022, 15, 8965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rydz, D.; Dyja, H.; Berski, S. The prediction of curvature of bimetallic plate Al-Cu during asymmetrical cold rolling. Metalurgija 2003, 42, 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  28. Stradomski, G.; Gzik, S.; Jakubus, A.; Nadolski, M. The assessment of resistance to thermal fatigue and thermal shock of cast iron used for glass moulds. Arch. Foundry Eng. 2018, 18, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dyl, T.; Starosta, R.; Rydz, D.; Koczurkiewicz, B.; Kusmierska-Matyszczak, W. The experimental and numerical research for plastic working of nickel matrix composite coatings. Materials 2020, 13, 3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dyl, T.; Rydz, D.; Szarek, A.; Stradomski, G.; Fik, J.; Opydo, M. The Influence of Slide Burnishing on the Technological Quality of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 Steel. Materials 2024, 17, 3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garstka, T.; Dyl, T. Circumferential residual stresses in tubes estimated by means of deflection method. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2006, 2, 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dembiczak, T.; Knapiński, M. Shaping microstructure and mechanical properties of high-carbon bainitic steel in hot-rolling and long-term low-temperature annealing. Materials 2021, 14, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schindler, I.; Kawulok, R.; Opela, P.; Kawulok, P.; Rusz, S.; Sojka, J.; Sauer, M.; Navrátil, H.; Pindor, L. Effects of austenitization temperature and pre-deformation on CCT diagrams of 23MnNiCrMo5-3 steel. Materials 2020, 13, 5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dyl, T.; Starosta, R. Effect of the Ceramic Dispersion in the Nickel Matrix Composite Coatings on Corrosion Properties after Plastic Working. Solid State Phenom. 2012, 183, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dyl, T.C.; Kuśmierska-Matyszczak, W. The Effect of the Burnishing Process on the Strain Rate and State Stress in Hollow Steel Tubes. Metals 2025, 15, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stradomski, G.; Rydz, D.; Dyja, H. Bimetal plate St3S + Cu. Metalurgija 2005, 44, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
  37. Transvalor, S.A. FORGE® Reference Guide Release; Parc de Haute Technologie: Sophia–Antipolis, France, 2024; Available online: https://www.transvalor.com/en/forge (accessed on 20 October 2025).
  38. Banaszek, G.; Stefanik, A. Theoretical and laboratory modelling of the closure of metallurgical defects during forming of a forging. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 177, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hartley, P.; Pillinger, I. Numerical simulation of the forging process. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195, 6676–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, K.; Yang, Y.; Shao, G.; Liu, K. Strain function analysis method for void closure in the forging process of the large−sized steel ingot. Comput. Master. Sci. 2012, 51, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goh, C.-H.; Dachowicz, A.P.; Allen, J.K.; Mistree, F. A Computational Method for the Design of Materials Accounting for the Process–Structure–Property–Performance (PSPP) Relationship. In Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) for Metals; Horstemeyer, M.F., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Norton, F.H. Creep of Steel at High Temperature; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1929. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoff, N.J. Approximate Analysis of Structures in the Presence of Moderately Large Steps Deformation. Quart. Appl. Mech. 1954, 12, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
  44. Trzepieciński, T. A Study of the Coefficient of Friction in Steel Sheets Forming. Metals 2019, 9, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic view of defects: (a,b) longitudinal defects in sheets—(a) downward bending direction—positive, (b) upward bending direction—negative; (c,d) transverse defects in sheets in the form of bending—(c) downward bending direction—positive, (d) upward bending direction—negative; (e) edge waviness in sheets. Own elaboration based on [7].
Figure 1. Schematic view of defects: (a,b) longitudinal defects in sheets—(a) downward bending direction—positive, (b) upward bending direction—negative; (c,d) transverse defects in sheets in the form of bending—(c) downward bending direction—positive, (d) upward bending direction—negative; (e) edge waviness in sheets. Own elaboration based on [7].
Materials 19 01053 g001
Figure 2. Dog-bone specimen used in the tests.
Figure 2. Dog-bone specimen used in the tests.
Materials 19 01053 g002
Figure 3. Averaged flow stress curves obtained from the results of the static tensile test: (a) S235JR + AR, (b) S500MC.
Figure 3. Averaged flow stress curves obtained from the results of the static tensile test: (a) S235JR + AR, (b) S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g003
Figure 4. Sheet scanning using a 3D laser scanner. Own elaboration.
Figure 4. Sheet scanning using a 3D laser scanner. Own elaboration.
Materials 19 01053 g004
Figure 5. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning for the steel grade S235JR + AR.
Figure 5. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning for the steel grade S235JR + AR.
Materials 19 01053 g005
Figure 6. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning for the steel grade S500MC.
Figure 6. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning for the steel grade S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g006
Figure 7. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning: (a) for steel grade S235JR + AR and (b) for steel grade S500MC.
Figure 7. Sheet surface from the end of the coil obtained by 3D laser scanning: (a) for steel grade S235JR + AR and (b) for steel grade S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g007
Figure 8. Graphical representation of the mathematical models of flow stress for the exemplary steel grade S235JR + AR (C—actual curve; E—Young’s modulus; F—four-parameter stress function; Ys—flow stress).
Figure 8. Graphical representation of the mathematical models of flow stress for the exemplary steel grade S235JR + AR (C—actual curve; E—Young’s modulus; F—four-parameter stress function; Ys—flow stress).
Materials 19 01053 g008
Figure 9. The flow stress value σf for temperatures 10–100 °C, strain rates 0.0001–100 s−1 and true strains in the range 0.0001–0.2 presented in tabular form: (a) steel S235JR + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Figure 9. The flow stress value σf for temperatures 10–100 °C, strain rates 0.0001–100 s−1 and true strains in the range 0.0001–0.2 presented in tabular form: (a) steel S235JR + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g009
Figure 10. Diagram of the roll straightener and the models used for computer simulation of sheet straightening: (a) five-roll, (b) seven-roll, (c) nine-roll.
Figure 10. Diagram of the roll straightener and the models used for computer simulation of sheet straightening: (a) five-roll, (b) seven-roll, (c) nine-roll.
Materials 19 01053 g010aMaterials 19 01053 g010b
Figure 11. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet five-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Figure 11. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet five-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g011
Figure 12. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet seven-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Figure 12. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet seven-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g012
Figure 13. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet nine-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Figure 13. Equivalent stress distribution during sheet nine-roll straightening: (a) steel S235 + AR, (b) steel S500MC.
Materials 19 01053 g013
Figure 14. The view of the areas (measuring points) in which measurement data were collected.
Figure 14. The view of the areas (measuring points) in which measurement data were collected.
Materials 19 01053 g014
Figure 15. Sample preparation diagram for the author’s method of assessing straightening effectiveness.
Figure 15. Sample preparation diagram for the author’s method of assessing straightening effectiveness.
Materials 19 01053 g015
Figure 16. Example result of strip bending measurement for a 3 mm thick sheet of S235JR steel.
Figure 16. Example result of strip bending measurement for a 3 mm thick sheet of S235JR steel.
Materials 19 01053 g016
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of analysed materials.
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.%) of analysed materials.
CSiMnPSAlFe
S235JR + AR0.220.051.620.0520.0480.014ball.
S500MC0.110.451.550.0210.0100.012ball.
Table 2. Designation of samples for hardness testing.
Table 2. Designation of samples for hardness testing.
Steel GradeSample DesignationSampling Location
S235JR + AR1 (b,m,e)middle
1_1 (b,m,e)edge
S500MC/32 (b,m,e)middle
2_1 (b,m,e)edge
Table 3. Hardness measurement results.
Table 3. Hardness measurement results.
Des.12345MeanStd. Dev.% Difference
1b127.7128.8128.9127.8128.5128.30.56
1_1b135.5136.7135.2133.4131.4134.42.074.75
2b229.8226.4226.3229.4227.1227.81.68
2_1b232.9235.7234.5237.6233.9234.91.813.13
1m126.3127.2127.9128.5129.7127.91.29
1_1m132.1131.0132.4134.2132.1132.41.163.47
2m228.9225.3226.5224.7225.1226.11.70
2_1m229.6230.1231.2234.6237.9232.73.512.91
1e128.7127.8128.9128.5129.7128.70.69
1_1e142.1144.2142.8138.0139.0141.22.629.71
2e231.8234.4233.4236.1234.1234.01.56
2_1e239.9238.7237.9238.5239.4238.90.782.10
Table 4. Anisotropy of the sheet made of S235JR + AR Steel.
Table 4. Anisotropy of the sheet made of S235JR + AR Steel.
Average Across WidthDifference, %
Beginning of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa238227248237.78.5
UTS, MPa3643533753645.9
Middle of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa231226234230.33.4
UTS, MPa353351352352.00.3
End of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa237230244237.05.7
UTS, MPa365346381364.09.2
Average along coil lengthYs, MPa235228242235.05.9
UTS, MPa361350369360.05.1
Ys, %0.32.01.6
UTS, %0.32.06.1
Table 5. Anisotropy of the sheet made of S500MC steel.
Table 5. Anisotropy of the sheet made of S500MC steel.
Average Across WidthDifference, %
Beginning of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa364353375364.05.9
UTS, MPa520499535518.06.7
Middle of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa353351352352.00.3
UTS, MPa510500506505.31.2
End of coil
Edge 1CenterEdge 2
Ys, MPa365346381364.09.2
UTS, MPa506489516503.75.2
Average along coil lengthYs, MPa360.7350.0369.3360.05.1
UTS, MPa512.0496.0519.0509.04.4
Ys, %0.32.01.6
UTS, %3.02.06.1
Table 6. Characteristics of averaged yield stress curves.
Table 6. Characteristics of averaged yield stress curves.
Steel GradeConventional Yield Strength
Ys, MPa
Tensile Strength
UTS, MPa
Young’s Modulus
E, GPa
Maximum Absolute Error
Δ, MPa
Maximum Relative Error
δ, %
S235JR + AR234360181±8.252.29
S500MC509582169±10.631.83
Table 7. Coefficients of Function (1) Defining the Flow Stress.
Table 7. Coefficients of Function (1) Defining the Flow Stress.
Steel GradeKm1m2m3
S235JR + AR4830.180.0011.8
S500MC7870.120.0010.01
Table 8. Geometric parameters of the sheet waviness measurement for the selected steel grades using the 3D laser scanning method after uncoiling.
Table 8. Geometric parameters of the sheet waviness measurement for the selected steel grades using the 3D laser scanning method after uncoiling.
Steel GradeSheet Thickness, mmSheet Width, mmAverage Waviness Height, mmWaviness Wavelength, mm
Center of the CoilEnd of the Coil
S235JR + AR3150015.221.5Irregular
S500MC3150029.734.8Irregular
Table 9. The values of the relative percentage differences.
Table 9. The values of the relative percentage differences.
Steel GradeTensile Force
F0.2
kN
Experiment
Tensile Force
F0.2
kN
FEM Table
Tensile Force
F0.2
kN
FEM Function
Difference
Experiment/FEM Table
%
Difference
Experiment/FEM Function
%
S235JR + AR13.96413.90312.389−0.4−4.2
S500MC30.17029.86626.238−1.0−2.7
Table 10. The results of stress and strain from the measurement points.
Table 10. The results of stress and strain from the measurement points.
S235StraighteningRollSumUpper Rolls Settings
12345678UR1UP2UP3UP4
Strain50.00290.00660.00570.0042xxxx0.019312.51.0xx
Stress5231.70252.97248.99241.25xxxx
Strain70.00250.00630.00730.00740.00650.0056xx0.03566.03.51.0x
Stress7227.73251.71255.99256.17252.83248.68xx
Strain90.00160.00430.00570.00620.00620.00600.00550.00500.04034.03.02.01.0
Stress9217.29241.66248.99251.54251.33250.31248.02245.45
S500MCStraighteningRollSumUpper Rolls Settings
12345678UR1UP2UP3UP4
Strain50.00330.00710.00630.0052xxxx0.021913.02.5xx
Stress5501.06517.00514.57510.42xxxx
Strain70.00270.00670.00770.00750.00710.0067xx0.03856.53.52.5x
Stress7454.44515.82518.44518.13516.97515.82xx
Strain90.00200.00530.00680.00740.00720.00680.00640.00610.04795.04.02.52.0
Stress9340.76510.85516.08517.76517.04515.86514.63513.61
Table 11. Example measurement results for the tested materials.
Table 11. Example measurement results for the tested materials.
GradeMeasurement DirectionDeflection Value, mmMean
12345678910
S235JRAlong the straightening1.821.150.951.231.060.861.321.261.461.481.26
Across straightening0.780.710.630.510.490.490.410.530.540.760.59
S500MCAlong the straightening1.551.891.211.471.511.411.741.411.631.271.51
Across straightening0.990.840.720.680.790.570.710.730.810.610.75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stradomski, G.; Mróz, S.; Szota, P.; Garstka, T.; Gróbarczyk, J.; Gryczkowski, R. Comparative Analysis of the Application of Five-, Seven- and Nine-Roll Sheet Straightening Using Numerical Tools. Materials 2026, 19, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061053

AMA Style

Stradomski G, Mróz S, Szota P, Garstka T, Gróbarczyk J, Gryczkowski R. Comparative Analysis of the Application of Five-, Seven- and Nine-Roll Sheet Straightening Using Numerical Tools. Materials. 2026; 19(6):1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stradomski, Grzegorz, Sebastian Mróz, Piotr Szota, Tomasz Garstka, Jakub Gróbarczyk, and Radosław Gryczkowski. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of the Application of Five-, Seven- and Nine-Roll Sheet Straightening Using Numerical Tools" Materials 19, no. 6: 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061053

APA Style

Stradomski, G., Mróz, S., Szota, P., Garstka, T., Gróbarczyk, J., & Gryczkowski, R. (2026). Comparative Analysis of the Application of Five-, Seven- and Nine-Roll Sheet Straightening Using Numerical Tools. Materials, 19(6), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop