Next Article in Journal
Can the Dimensional Optimisation of 3D FDM-Manufactured Parts Be a Solution for a Correct Design?
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Relative Humidity on Creep Behavior of Cement Paste Microprism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Steel Ball Impact on SiC/AlSi12 Interpenetrated Composite by Peridynamics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Alumina-Rich Spinel Exsolution on the Mechanical Property of Calcium Aluminate Cement-Bonded Corundum Castables

1
Henan Key Laboratory of High Temperature Functional Ceramics, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450004, China
3
Jiangsu Jingxin New Materials Co., Ltd., Yangzhou 225000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(2), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020405
Submission received: 23 December 2024 / Revised: 8 January 2025 / Accepted: 14 January 2025 / Published: 16 January 2025

Abstract

:
This study investigates the effect of the exsolution behavior of alumina-rich spinel on the formation and distribution of CA6 (CaAl12O19) in corundum castables bonded with calcium aluminate cement. In this study, alumina-rich spinel is substituted for tabular corundum in the same proportions and grain size. The matrices after curing were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The phase composition and microstructure of the matrices containing alumina-rich spinel were analyzed after firing at 1600 °C. These results showed that the addition of alumina-rich spinel significantly improved the mechanical strength of the castables. This improvement was attributed to the alumina produced by spinel exsolution during firing at 1600 °C, which reacted in situ with CA2 (CaAl4O7) to form CA6. CA6 connects the different particles and forms an interspersed interlocking structure within the spinel. The CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure replaces part of the CA6-Al2O3 structure and significantly improves the mechanical strength of the castables.

1. Introduction

Corundum-based castable is a type of unshaped refractory material [1], which typically exhibits outstanding mechanical strength and high-temperature performance [2,3,4,5,6]. Consequently, it finds extensive applications in high-temperature furnaces for the iron and steel, non-ferrous metal, glass, cement, and other industries [7,8]. With the rapid development of the steel industry, corundum-based castables with higher thermal shock resistance are required for ladle linings. To improve the thermal shock resistance of castables, a certain amount of magnesia–alumina spinel is usually added to the castables [9,10].
Magnesia–alumina spinel exhibits a high melting point, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, high resistance to slag, and low thermal conductivity [11,12,13,14]. The typical formula of magnesia–alumina spinel is MgAl2O4. However, the magnesia–alumina spinel is actually a limited solid solution of MgO and Al2O3 [15]. In addition, the magnesia–alumina spinel has a wide solid solution range for alumina at 1600 °C, ranging from 71 wt.% to 82 wt.% according to the magnesia–alumina phase diagram [16]. When the Al2O3 content of spinel is higher than 82 wt.% at 1600 °C, the spinel could undergo exsolution.
Calcium aluminate cement (CAC) serves as the primary binder for corundum castables due to its excellent strength and mechanical strength at high temperatures [17,18,19,20,21]. The main mineral phases of high-alumina CAC are CA (CaAl2O4) and CA2 (CaAl4O7). When water comes in contact with the surface of CAC particles, these mineral phases begin to hydrate, resulting in various hydration products such as C3AH6 (Ca3Al2O6·6H2O), AH3 (Al2O3·3H2O), CAH10 (CaAl2O4·10H2O), and C2AH8 (Ca2Al2O5·8H2O) [22,23,24,25]. As the heating temperature rises, these hydration products gradually dehydrate and react with Al2O3 in castables to form CA2 at 1200 °C, followed by the generation of CA6 (CaAl12O19) at above 1400 °C. CA6 is usually present in hexagonal flakes, and it binds the corundum phase to provide strength to the castable [26,27,28]. However, when spinel is introduced into the CAC-bonded corundum castables, if the Al2O3 content of spinel is higher than 82 wt.%, the spinel will exsolve Al2O3 during calcination. Then, the exsolved Al2O3 may preferentially be involved in generating CA6, which in turn changes the distribution of CA6 in the castables, thus affecting the performance of the castables.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of spinel addition on the properties of high-alumina refractories. For instance, Auvray et al. reported that incorporating spinel significantly enhances the corrosion resistance of high-alumina refractories [28]. Similarly, Diazl A observed that the addition of magnesia-rich spinel not only improved the strength of magnesia–spinel refractories but also increased their corrosion resistance, attributed to the in situ reaction between spinel and alumina leading to the formation of additional spinel [29]. This improvement is partially due to the volumetric expansion of spinel during its formation, which helps to fill the microscopic pores within the material, thereby enhancing its densification. Furthermore, Quan Z demonstrated that varying amounts of AR74 spinel (the spinel containing 74 wt.% alumina) could improve the corrosion resistance of Al2O3-SiO2-CaCO3 castables to different extents, further validating spinel’s effectiveness in enhancing the performance of refractory materials [30].
However, most of their studies focus on spinel with less than 82 wt.% alumina content, and the influence of spinel exsolution on the microstructure and mechanical properties of castable in the actual working environment is rarely investigated [6,31,32,33,34]. This work mainly aims to study the effect of the exsolved Al2O3 from MgAl2O4 on the formation and distribution of CA6 in CAC-bonded corundum–spinel castables. Various proportions (0, 5, 10, and 15 wt.%) of the spinel powders were added into CAC-bonded corundum-based castables, and the mechanical strength of castables and the phases and microstructure evolution of the matrix were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and the Preparation of Castables and Matrix

The fused magnesia–alumina spinel powders were supplied by Henan Hecheng Special Refractory Materials Co., Ltd. (Kaifeng, China). The theoretical alumina content of this spinel is 90 wt.%, which is far beyond the alumina proportion (72 wt.%) of stoichiometric spinel. The XRD and EDS analysis in Figure 1 demonstrates that this spinel contains a small proportion of α- and β-alumina, and the actual alumina content in the spinel phase is about 89.28 wt.%. The presence of alumina phases is attributed to the impurities in the raw materials and the slight exsolution of alumina from the spinel during cooling. As the actual alumina content of this spinel is much closer to 90 wt.%, it is still marked as MA-90 in this paper.
In the present work, corundum–spinel castable was prepared using tabular alumina (6-3 mm, 3-1 mm, 1-0.5 mm, 0.5-0 mm, Jiangsu Jingxin New Materials Co., Ltd., Yangzhou, China) as aggregate. The tabular alumina fine powders (≤45 μm, Jiangsu Jingxin New Materials Co., Ltd.), fused MA-90 fine powders (≤45 μm), calcium aluminate cement (CAC, Secar 71, Kerneos Aluminate Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), and reactive alumina micro-powders (HA115, Jiangsu Jingxin New Materials Co., Ltd) form the matrix. The particle size distribution of fused MA-90 fine powders and tabular alumina fine powders used in this study is shown in Figure 2. The chemical composition of the tabular alumina used in this study is shown in Table 1. The total water addition was 4 wt.%. In addition, ADS1 and ADW1 (Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) were selected as dispersants.
The formulations of castables with different contents of spinel are shown in Table 2. The weighed raw materials were dry-mixed in a laboratory mixer for 1 min and then wet-mixed for another 2 min. Subsequently, the mixtures were cast into molds with sizes of 40 × 40 × 160 mm under vibration and then cured at 25 °C for 24 h. After curing, the castables were demolded for drying at 110 °C for 24 h and then fired at 1600 °C for 3 h.
The matrices were prepared according to the formulations in Table 3. The mixture was cast into a cylindrical specimen with Φ 50 × 50 mm. After curing at 25 °C for 24 h, the specimens were demolded. And they were dried at 110 °C for 24 h and fired at 1600 °C for 3 h.

2.2. Methods

The cold modulus of rupture (CMOR) and cold compressive strength (CCS) of castables after drying and firing were determined in accordance with the Chinese standards GB/T 3001-2007 [35] and GB/T 5072-2023 [36], respectively. CMOR is measured using a three-point bending test, with the formula CMOR = 3 F L 2 b d 2 . Among them, F is the maximum load, L is the distance between the support points, b is the width of castables, and d is the thickness of castables. CCS is determined through a compression test, with the formula CCS = F A . Among them, F is the maximum load, and A is the stress area of castables.
The castables after firing at 1600 °C were used in the thermal shock resistance test according to the Chinese standard YB/T 4018-1991 [37]. The castables were held at 1100 °C for 30 min and then cooled to 25 °C in air for one cycle. After repeating the above cycle 3 times, the CMOR of the castables was tested. The residual CMOR was used to characterize the thermal shock resistance of castables with various contents of spinel. The mean of three samples was taken to determine the CCS, CMOR, and the remaining CMOR values.
XRD was used to analyze the phase compositions of MA-90 before and after calcination at 1600 °C for 3 h. Furthermore, the matrix samples’ composition was analyzed following firing at 1600 °C for 3 h. XRD analysis was conducted using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) at a scanning speed of 2° min−1 in the 2θ range from 10° to 80°. Semiquantitative XRD (SXRD) phase analysis of the matrices after firing was performed using the Rietveld method with Topas 6.0 software (Bruker, Germany) by refining parameters and fitting the peak areas.
The matrices after firing were embedded in resin and then polished using a metallographic polishing machine after solidification. The cross-section microstructure of the matrices with different contents of spinel was characterized by means of a scanning electron microscope (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany), equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Exsolution of MA-90

Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of MA-90 before and after firing at 1600 °C for 3 h. The crystal phases in MA-90 contain MgAl2O4 (MA), α-Al2O3, and β-Al2O3 before firing. After firing at 1600 °C, the predominant phases remain α-Al2O3, MA, and β-Al2O3. Furthermore, the diffraction peaks of β-Al2O3 in the sample have shown no significant change, while the diffraction peaks of α-Al2O3 at 25.67°, 35.37°, 43.54°, 52.76°, 57.69°, and 68.30° are significantly higher. Rwp (weighted profile R factor) is a parameter used in semi-quantitative XRD analysis to evaluate the quality of the fit between observed and calculated diffraction patterns, with lower values indicating a better fit. The semiquantitative analysis in Table 4 demonstrates that the content of α-Al2O3 in the sample increases from 6.3 wt.% to 42.9 wt.% after firing, demonstrating that MA-90 undergoes considerable exsolution after firing at 1600 °C.

3.2. Mechanical Strength

It can be postulated that exsolution of MA-90 after firing may impact the performance of the castables. In order to ascertain the effect of MA-90 exsolution on the mechanical strength of the castables, an investigation was conducted to determine the CMOR and CCS of the castables with varying contents of MA-90. As spinel powders were introduced by replacing the same proportion and particle size of tabular corundum powders, the flowability of the four groups of castables was basically similar. Therefore, the flowability of the castables has a fundamentally similar effect on the mechanical strength of the castables. Figure 4 presents the CMOR and CCS of castables added with MA-90 after firing at 1600 °C. As the MA-90 content is raised from 0 to 15 wt.%, the CMOR and CCS of castables after firing at 1600 °C increase. For instance, the CCS of castables improves from 147.3 MPa to 196.9 MPa as the MA-90 content increases from 0 to 15 wt.%. Meanwhile, the CMOR of castables grows by 74.3% from 24.9 MPa to 43.4 MPa. In summary, the addition of MA-90 can markedly improve the mechanical strength of CAC-bonded corundum castables.

3.3. Thermal Shock Resistance

The CMOR and ratio of residual CMOR of pre-treated specimens after firing are shown in Figure 5a,b. As shown in Figure 5a, the residual flexural strength of the castables increased slightly with the addition of MA-90. For example, the residual flexural strength of the control sample is 11.70 MPa, while the residual flexural strength of the castables containing 5 wt.% MA-90 is 16.17 MPa, resulting in a 38.2% increase. With the spinel content increased to 15 wt.%, the residual flexural strength of the castables improved to 19.27 MPa, which represents a 64.7% increase. However, as shown in Figure 5b, the residual flexural strength retention of the castables always remained at about 47%.
This may be due to the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between spinel (8.9 × 10−6 °C−1) and corundum (8.3 × 10−6 °C−1) at high temperatures; microcracks formed between the two interfaces during the rapid cooling of thermal shock resistance tests, resulting in reduced flexural strength. With the spinel content increased, more and more microcracks could be generated in the castables after the thermal shock test, so the castables’ flexural strength decreased significantly. It can be seen from Figure 5b that the ratio of residual CMOR slightly decreases as the spinel content increases from 0 to 15 wt.%. This also indicates that the addition of an excessive amount of MA-90 is not beneficial to the thermal shock resistance of the castables.

3.4. Phase Composition

Figure 6 and Figure 7 illustrate the XRD patterns and the results of semiquantitative analyses of matrices with varying MA-90 contents after firing at 1600 °C. As illustrated in Figure 6, the predominant phases in the control sample are corundum (Al2O3) and CaAl12O19 (CA6). And the main phases in M90-5, M90-10, and M90-15 are Al2O3, CA6, and MgAl2O4 (MA).
To determine the percentage of phase composition in each type of matrix, the XRD patterns shown in Figure 6 were analyzed using Rietveld refinement. The Rwp values of M90-0, M90-5, M90-10, and M90-15 are 14.22%, 13.6%, 14.53%, and 14.18%, respectively. Figure 7 shows that all specimens have a uniform CA6 content of about 47–49%. Since calcium aluminate cement is the only source of calcium, it entirely converts to CA6 upon firing at 1600 °C. According to Table 4, the amount of calcium aluminate cement in each sample is the same, and the amount of CA6 produced is equal. According to Figure 7 and Table 4, it can be calculated that the content of Al2O3 in the matrices decreases after firing. For example, the formation of CA6 in the control sample consumed 35.5% of Al2O3, while M90-5, M90-10, and M90-15 consumed 24.9%, 16%, and 9.6% of Al2O3, respectively. With the increase in MA content, the amount of corundum consumed in the matrix gradually decreases. This also indicates that the MA exsolves Al2O3 from the interior and replenishes the corundum in the matrix after firing. A portion of Al2O3 required to generate CA6 is derived from the matrix composition with spinel, while the exsolution of MA-90 provides the remainder. This result also proves that spinel exsolution occurred after firing at 1600 °C.
According to Figure 7 and Table 4, it can also be calculated that the spinel content in M90-5, M90-10, and M90-15 is reduced by 9.4%, 19.4%, and 22.6%, respectively. As the spinel content increases, more Al2O3 is exsolved from spinel.
In conclusion, the Al2O3 exsolved from MA participated in generating CA6. With the increase in MA addition, the content of exsolved Al2O3 in MA increased. Furthermore, the exsolution of Al2O3 from MA to generate CA6 is also increasing gradually.

3.5. Microstructure of the Matrix

It has been established that MA exsolves Al2O3 after firing. Then, the exsolved Al2O3 may react with CA2 to form CA6, which is most likely to change the internal microstructure of the castables. Therefore, the microscopic morphology of the matrix with different MA-90 contents added is observed, which in turn elucidates the reasons affecting the properties of the castables. Figure 8a illustrates the microscopic morphology of M90-0 after firing at 1600 °C. Figure 8c shows that Point (I) is corundum and Point (II) is CA6 as analyzed by EDS. After firing at 1600 °C, CA6 and corundum sintered together to form a CA6-Al2O3 structure. Figure 8c shows that CA6 primarily occurs between the corundum particles, forming a structure providing strength to the castable.
Figure 9a shows the phase distribution of M90-5 after firing at 1600 °C. The results of EDS analysis show that Point (III) is Al2O3, Point (IV) is MgAl2O4, and Points (V) and (VI) are CA6. As illustrated in Figure 9c, a portion of CA6 is generated at the edge of the spinel, and another portion of CA6 traverses the interior of the MA, forming a CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure. This can be attributed to the exsolution of Al2O3 from MA-90 during firing at 1600 °C. The exsolved alumina has higher reactivity, which reacts preferentially with calcium oxide, to form in situ the interspersed CA6 within the MA.
As demonstrated in Figure 9c, the Al2O3 content of MA-90 decreased from 89.28 wt.% to 82.9 wt.%, indicating that the MA undergoes exsolution after firing at 1600 °C. Furthermore, there is no direct link between corundum and spinel in Figure 9c. It is worth noting that the CA6-MA interlocked structure is tighter than the CA6-Al2O3 structure. The CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure replaced part of the CA6-Al2O3 structure when 5 wt.% spinel was added to the castables. Consequently, the cold strength of C90-5 is higher than that of C90-0.
Figure 10a depicts the microscopic morphology of M90-10 after firing at 1600 °C. Based on the EDS analysis, it can be deduced that Point (VII) is CA6, Point (IX) is Al2O3, and Point (VIII) is MgAl2O4. Point (X) demonstrates that CA6 is interspersed within MA. In addition, the alumina content of MA-90 decreased from 89.28 wt.% to 82.4 wt.%. This suggests that the alumina exsolution occurs within the alumina-rich spinel after firing. As illustrated in Figure 10b, the CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure in the matrix gradually increases with the increase in MA content.
Figure 11a depicts the microscopic morphology of M90-15 after firing at 1600 °C. Based on the EDS analysis, the principal phases present in the M90-15 matrix specimen are Al2O3, MA, and CA6. Figure 11c shows that CA6 is generated in MA, forming a CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure.
As MA content in the castables increases, more alumina has been exsolved from MA. More CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structures are generated in the matrix. Comparison of Figure 9b and Figure 10b with Figure 11b shows an increase in the replacement of the CA6-Al2O3 structure by the CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure in Figure 11b, which may have made the cold strength of C90-15 much higher than that of C90-5 and C90-10.

3.6. Mechanism of CA6 Formation and Distribution

Based on the above analysis, the mechanism of CA6 formation and distribution of CAC-bonded corundum castables containing alumina-rich spinel can be represented as Figure 12. Figure 12a shows the schematic microstructure of the sample matrix without MA addition, mainly consisting of CA6-Al2O3 structures. Figure 12b illustrates the castable’s microstructure after introducing a small quantity of MA-90. One portion of CA6 is attached to corundum particles, while the other portion is irregularly dispersed within MA, forming a CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure.
This phenomenon is attributed to the fact that the exsolution temperature of alumina-rich spinel is close to the formation temperature of CA6. When the firing temperature rises to 1400 °C, spinel begins to exsolve alumina. Simultaneously, CA2 reacts with the alumina to form CA6. Due to the higher reactivity of the exsolved alumina, it preferentially reacts with CA2, resulting in the uniform dispersion of the generated CA6 within the spinel particles. The CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure provides critical support and load-bearing functions during strength testing, effectively distributing external loads and enhancing the castables’ overall strength. Consequently, as the MA content gradually increases, the CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure also increases accordingly. The CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure gives the castable greater mechanical strength. With a further increase in spinel content in the castables, as shown in Figure 12c,d, the CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure gradually replaces the CA6-Al2O3 bonded structure, which significantly improves the post-firing strength of the castables.

4. Conclusions

The alumina-rich spinel exsolves Al2O3 after calcination at 1600 °C, resulting in a decrease in Al2O3 content from 89.28 wt.% to 82 wt.%. With the addition of MA-90 spinel to the castables, the exsolved alumina has higher reactivity, which reacts preferentially with CA2 to form CA6. As a result, CA6 is irregularly interspersed within the spinel particles, forming a CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure.
The CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure is tighter than the CA6-Al2O3 structures. When the CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structure replaces part of the CA6-Al2O3 structure, it enhances the mechanical strength of the castables. As the quantity of alumina-rich spinel incorporated into the castables increases, the content of exsolved alumina rises, forming more and more CA6-MA interspersed interlocking structures and improving the mechanical strength of the castables.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.H.; methodology, Z.Z.; software, Y.Z.; validation, Q.H.; formal analysis, Z.Z. and G.Y.; investigation, K.Y. and J.T.; resources, J.T.; data curation, Y.Z. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.M.; visualization, Y.M.; supervision, G.Y.; funding acquisition, J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52172030 and 52108258).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52172030 and 52108258) for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Jian He was employed by the company Jiangsu Jingxin New Materials Co., Ltd., and author Yuandong Mu was employed by the company China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Sun, W.; He, H.; Zhang, H.; Xiong, X.; Peng, Z. Effect of composite micro-powder added with α-Al2O3 and zirconium basic carbonate on the structure and properties of corundum castable. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 8058–8070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, W.; Liao, N.; Nath, M.; Ji, Z.; Dai, Y.; Pan, L.; Li, Y.; Jastrzębska, I.; Szczerba, J. Effects of curing time on the pore structure evolution and fracture behavior of CAC bonded alumina-spinel castables. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 25000–25010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, W.; Liao, N.; Nath, M.; Li, Y.; Dai, Y.; Pan, L. Effects of characteristic hydrates on the pore structure and fracture behavior of CAC bonded alumina-spinel castables. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 389, 131736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qi, X.; Fu, L.; Zou, Y.; Gu, H.; Huang, A.; Chen, D.; Yang, S. A novel low thermal conductivity refractory aggregate for high-temperature applications: Lightweight microporous alumina-rich spinel (Mg0.4Al2.4O4). Ceram. Int. 2024, 50 Pt B, 3526–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, P.; Zhu, B. Matrix microstructure optimization of alumina-spinel castables and its effect on high temperature properties. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, D.; Li, C.; Jiang, N.; Gao, J.; Touzo, B.; Yuan, W. Influence of powder characteristics of reactive alumina on properties of alumina-spinel castables. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 9984–9990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Xiao, J.; Wei, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, G.; Zhang, S.; Li, N. Degradation behaviors of cement-free corundum-spinel castables in Ruhrstahl Heraeus refining ladle: Role of infiltrated steel. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 32008–32014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, L. Enhancing mechanism of improved slag resistance of Al2O3-spinel castables added with pre-synthesized (Al,Cr)2O3 micro-powder. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 33322–33329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xuan, S.; Tian, Y.; Kong, X.; Hao, J.; Wang, X. Enhancement of thermal shock resistance of Al2O3–MgAl2O4 composites by controlling the content and distribution of spinel phase. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49 Pt A, 39908–39916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aksel, C.; Riley, F.L. Effect of the particle size distribution of spinel on the mechanical properties and thermal shock performance of MgO–spinel composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 23, 3079–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khalil, N.M. Recent Developments in Magnesia-Spinel Refractory Composites, Part 1. Interceram Int. J. Bricks Struct. Clay Prod. Refract. Pottery Fine Ceram. Abras. Spec. Ceram. 2008, 6, 57. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mohapatra, D.; Sarkar, D. Effect of in situ spinel seeding on synthesis of MgO-rich MgAl2O4 composite. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 7286–7293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zubrzycka, P.; Radecka, M.; Graule, T.; Trenczek-Zając, A.; Zientara, D.; Stuer, M. MgAl2O4 spinel with transmittance approaching theoretical value at reduced sintering temperatures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 6047–6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Ye, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Bai, W.; Tian, Y.; Qin, M. Low-cost preparation and characterization of MgAl2O4 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 7316–7319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Braulio, M.A.L.; Rigaud, M.; Buhr, A.; Parr, C.; Pandolfelli, V.C. Spinel-containing alumina-based refractory castables. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 1705–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, Q.; Zeng, J.; Mu, Y.; He, J.; Ye, G.; Tian, J. Effect of solid solution of magnesia-alumina spinel on the microstructure and mechanical properties of CAC-bonded corundum castables. Ceram. Int. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Liu, K.; Ding, D.; Zhang, J.; Ye, G. Effect of curing temperature on volume stability of CAC-bonded alumina-based castables. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 12066–12071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gungor, A.; Celikcioglu, O.; SAHIN, S. The physical and mechanical properties of alumina-based ultralow cement castable refractories. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 4189–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Parr, C.; Roesky, R.; Whrmeyer, C. Calcium aluminate cements for uushaped refractories. InterCeram Int. Ceram. Rev. 2001, 5, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gao, S.; Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Zhang, J.; Luan, J.; Ye, G.; Liao, G. Effect of CAC content on the strength of castables at temperatures between 300 and 1000 °C. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46 Pt A, 14957–14963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Mu, Y.; Liu, C.; Ye, G. Effect of pre-hydrated CAC suspensions on the hydration behavior of CAC pastes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 152, 105659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pacewska, B.; Nowacka, M. Studies of conversion progress of calcium aluminate cement hydrates by thermal analysis method. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 117, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Ye, G.; Gu, W.; Ding, D.; Chen, L.; Zhu, L. Conversion of calcium aluminate cement hydrates at 60 °C with and without water. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 2712–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bushnell-Watson, S.M.; Sharp, J.H. The effect of temperature upon the setting behaviour of refractory calcium aluminate cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 1986, 16, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ye, K.; Huang, G.; Zhao, Y.; Hou, Q.; Chen, J.; Tian, J.; Ye, G.; Mu, Y. Effect of CAC addition and pre-drying on the mechanical property of carbonated C2S(γ) mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 456, 139293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomba Martinez, A.G.; Luz, A.P.; Braulio, M.A.L.; Pandolfelli, V.C. CA6 impact on the corrosion behavior of cement-bonded spinel-containing refractory castables: An analysis based on thermodynamic simulations. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41 Pt B, 4714–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ukrainczyk, N.; Matusinović, T. Thermal properties of hydrating calcium aluminate cement pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Auvray, J.-M.; Gault, C.; Huger, M. Evolution of elastic properties and microstructural changes versus temperature in bonding phases of alumina and alumina–magnesia refractory castables. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 3489–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Díaz, L.A.; Torrecillas, R.; De Aza, A.H.; Pena, P. Effect of spinel content on slag attack resistance of high alumina refractory castables. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 4623–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Quan, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Dong, Y.; Deng, C.; Fu, G. Effects of different particle size of spinel and Y2O3 additive of the periclase-spinel refractory on the sintering densification and corrosion resistance to copper smelting slag. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 18180–18189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, W. Influence of light-burned spinel on the slag resistance of alumina-spinel refractory castables. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2014, 15, 441–446. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, H.; Zhao, L.; He, X.; Fang, W.; Lei, Z.X.; Chen, H. The fabrication of porous corundum spheres with core-shell structure for corundum-spinel castables. Mater. Des. 2015, 85, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pilli, V.; Sarkar, R. Effect of spinel content on the properties of Al2O3–SiC–C based trough castable. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42 Pt B, 2969–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fedorov, M.V.; Vasilieva, M.I. Study of phase transitions of ultradispersed spinel powder during solid-phase sintering at 1450 °C. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2022, 40, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. GB/T 3001-2017; Refractory Products-Determination of Modulus of Rupture at Ambient Temperture. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China (SAC): Beijing, China, 2017.
  36. GB/T 5072-2023; Refractory Products—Determination of Cold Compressive Strength. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China (SAC): Beijing, China, 2023.
  37. YB 4018-1991; Test Method for Thermal Shock Resistance of Refractory Products. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China (SAC): Beijing, China, 1991.
Figure 1. XRD (a) and EDS (b–d) analysis of MA-90.
Figure 1. XRD (a) and EDS (b–d) analysis of MA-90.
Materials 18 00405 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of 325 mesh tabular alumina (a) and 325 mesh MA-90 (b).
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of 325 mesh tabular alumina (a) and 325 mesh MA-90 (b).
Materials 18 00405 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MA-90 before and after firing at 1600 °C for 3 h.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MA-90 before and after firing at 1600 °C for 3 h.
Materials 18 00405 g003
Figure 4. Cold crushing strength (a) and cold modulus of rupture (b) of corundum–spinel castable after firing at 1600 °C for 3 h.
Figure 4. Cold crushing strength (a) and cold modulus of rupture (b) of corundum–spinel castable after firing at 1600 °C for 3 h.
Materials 18 00405 g004
Figure 5. Effect of MA-90 content on thermal shock resistance of corundum–spinel castable after heat-treating at 1100 °C: (a) CMOR before and after thermal shock test; (b) ratio of residual CMOR.
Figure 5. Effect of MA-90 content on thermal shock resistance of corundum–spinel castable after heat-treating at 1100 °C: (a) CMOR before and after thermal shock test; (b) ratio of residual CMOR.
Materials 18 00405 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the matrices after firing at 1600 °C.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the matrices after firing at 1600 °C.
Materials 18 00405 g006
Figure 7. Phase composition of the matrices after firing at 1600 °C.
Figure 7. Phase composition of the matrices after firing at 1600 °C.
Materials 18 00405 g007
Figure 8. Phase distribution of M90-0 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (d,e) EDS image.
Figure 8. Phase distribution of M90-0 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (d,e) EDS image.
Materials 18 00405 g008
Figure 9. Phase distribution of M90-5 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Figure 9. Phase distribution of M90-5 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Materials 18 00405 g009
Figure 10. Phase distribution of M90-10 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Figure 10. Phase distribution of M90-10 after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Materials 18 00405 g010
Figure 11. Phase distribution of 90-15 matrix after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Figure 11. Phase distribution of 90-15 matrix after firing at 1600 °C. (a) BSE image, (b,c) composite SE-EDS image, (df) EDS image.
Materials 18 00405 g011
Figure 12. Schematic of structure formation of CA6 in a matrix containing different proportions of alumina-rich spinel. (a) M90-0 (b) M90-5 (c) M90-10 (d) M90-15.
Figure 12. Schematic of structure formation of CA6 in a matrix containing different proportions of alumina-rich spinel. (a) M90-0 (b) M90-5 (c) M90-10 (d) M90-15.
Materials 18 00405 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of tabular alumina used in this work (wt.%).
Table 1. Chemical composition of tabular alumina used in this work (wt.%).
Al2O3SiO2Fe2O3Na2O
99.560.090.050.30
Table 2. Formulations of castables with different contents of spinel (wt.%).
Table 2. Formulations of castables with different contents of spinel (wt.%).
Raw MaterialsCastable Samples
C90-0C90-5C90-10C90-15
Tabular alumina6-3 mm28282828
3-1 mm22222222
1-0 mm20202020
d50 = 15.582 μm2015105
Reactive aluminaHA1156666
CementSecar 714444
MA-90d50 = 15.73 μm051015
DispersantADW1+0.4+0.4+0.4+0.4
ADS1+0.1+0.1+0.1+0.1
Table 3. Formulations of matrices with different contents of spinel (wt.%).
Table 3. Formulations of matrices with different contents of spinel (wt.%).
Raw MaterialsMatrix Samples
M90-0M90-5M90-10M90-15
Tabular aluminad50 = 15.582 μm675033.517
Reactive aluminaHA11520202020
CementSecar 7113131313
MA-90d50 = 15.73 μm01733.550
DispersantADW1+0.4+0.4+0.4+0.4
ADS1+0.1+0.1+0.1+0.1
Table 4. The percentage of phase composition in MA-90 obtained from semiquantitative analysis.
Table 4. The percentage of phase composition in MA-90 obtained from semiquantitative analysis.
SamplePhase Quantification/wt.%Agreement Factors
MAα-Al2O3β-Al2O3RWP/%
Before firing88.36.35.411.47
After firing51.342.95.812.02
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Ye, K.; Tian, J.; Mu, Y.; He, J.; Ye, G. The Effect of Alumina-Rich Spinel Exsolution on the Mechanical Property of Calcium Aluminate Cement-Bonded Corundum Castables. Materials 2025, 18, 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020405

AMA Style

Hou Q, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Ye K, Tian J, Mu Y, He J, Ye G. The Effect of Alumina-Rich Spinel Exsolution on the Mechanical Property of Calcium Aluminate Cement-Bonded Corundum Castables. Materials. 2025; 18(2):405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Qiqi, Zhongzhuang Zhang, Yaning Zhao, Kaiwei Ye, Jiajia Tian, Yuandong Mu, Jian He, and Guotian Ye. 2025. "The Effect of Alumina-Rich Spinel Exsolution on the Mechanical Property of Calcium Aluminate Cement-Bonded Corundum Castables" Materials 18, no. 2: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020405

APA Style

Hou, Q., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Ye, K., Tian, J., Mu, Y., He, J., & Ye, G. (2025). The Effect of Alumina-Rich Spinel Exsolution on the Mechanical Property of Calcium Aluminate Cement-Bonded Corundum Castables. Materials, 18(2), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop