Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study on Microstructural Characterization of Thick High Strength Low Alloy Steel Weld by Arc Welding and Laser Welding
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Microstructure Investigation, Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of the AA5083–WC Composite
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Shear Behavior and Failure Characteristics of Bolted Anisotropic Rock Joints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Improved Corrosion-Resistant AA5083—BN/WC Composites for Tribological Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 6
10.3390/ma16062209
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Si-La2O3 Coatings Deposited on 304 Stainless Steel by Microwave Cladding

by
Shashi Prakash Dwivedi
1,
Shubham Sharma
2,3,*,
Kanta Prasad Sharma
4,
Abhinav Kumar
5,
Ashish Agrawal
6,
Rajesh Singh
7,8 and
Sayed M. Eldin
9,*
1
G.L. Bajaj Institute of Technology & Management, Greater Noida 201310, India
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, University Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India
3
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China
4
Institute of Engineering & Technology, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
5
Department of Nuclear and Renewable Energy, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
6
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Udupi 576104, India
7
Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India
8
Department of Project Management, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, Campeche 24560, Mexico
9
Center of Research, Faculty of Engineering, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(6), 2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062209
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corrosion of Materials: Evaluation, Testing, Protection, and Failure Analysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this investigation, microwave radiation was used alongside a combination of Ni powder, Si powder, and La2O3 (Lanthanum oxide) powder to create surface cladding on SS-304 steel. To complete the microwave cladding process, 900 W at 2.45 GHz was used for 120 s. “Response surface methodology (RSM)” was utilized to attain the optimal combination of microwave cladding process parameters. The surface hardness of the cladding samples was taken as a response. The optimal combination of microwave cladding process parameters was found to be Si (wt.%) of 19.28, a skin depth of 4.57 µm, irradiation time of 118 s, and La2O3 (wt.%) of 11 to achieve a surface hardness of 287.25 HV. Experimental surface hardness at the corresponding microwave-cladding-process parameters was found to be 279 HV. The hardness of SS-304 was improved by about 32.85% at the optimum combination of microwave cladding process parameters. The SEM and optical microscopic images showed the presence of Si, Ni, and La2O3 particles. SEM images of the “cladding layer and surface” showed the “uniform cladding layer” with “fewer dark pixels” (yielding higher homogeneity). Higher homogeneity reduced the dimensional deviation in the developed cladding surface. XRD of the cladded surface showed the presence of FeNi, Ni2Si, FeNi3, NiSi2, Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases. The “wear rate and coefficient of friction” of the developed cladded surface with 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles were found to be 0.00367 mm3/m and 0.312, respectively. “Few dark spots” were observed on the “corroded surface”. These “dark spots” displayed “some corrosion (corrosion weight loss 0.49 mg)” in a “3.5 wt.% NaCl environment”.

1. Introduction

Steel is a widely used material on Earth. Further, steel offers diverse properties to meet a “wide range of applications”. Steel is used in various applications, such as electrical equipment (3%), domestic appliances (3%), metal products (11%), the automotive industry (12%), mechanical equipment, (15%), buildings and infrastructure (51%), and other forms of transport (5%). Steel is also used in buildings in addition to structural applications for heating ventilation and air conditioning systems, as well as items such as shelving, rails, and stairs [1,2]. SS-304 is nearly one of the most adaptable grades of stainless steel. The principle alloying element SS-304 is chromium other than ferrous. Chromium is present in SS-304 in the oxygen form, which creates a thin layer around the metal. This thin layer produces shielding from the outside environment. “Austenitic stainless steels” are a “non-magnetic material” and have a “BCC (Body-Centered Cubic) structure”. “Austenitic stainless steels” can be “work-hardened” but cannot be hardened by heat treatment. SS-304 is one of the most adaptable grades within the austenitic grades. SS-304 stainless steels are used in heat exchangers; automotive and aerospace components; doors and windows; architectural applications, such as cladding and roofing; fasteners and flange manufacturing; food processing equipment, such as wine making, milk processing, and beer brewing equipment. SS-304 stainless steels are also used in chemical containers, kitchen sinks, consumer durables, etc. [3,4].
The “tensile strength, compressive strength, and fatigue strength” of materials increase using ceramic reinforcement particles, and hardness increases with it. However, sometimes there is a need to significantly increase the “surface hardness of the material” as per the application. In such a situation, surface hardness cannot be significantly increased by the development of traditional composites [5]. In this situation, its surface property is improved by coating hard particles on the material. Today, the surface property of materials is being successfully increased using the microwave cladding technique [6].
Microwave energy applications can be observed in various sectors. However, it is currently being used extensively in food processing. Food is heated without any fuel by microwave energy [7]. Microwave energy applications can be also seen in the welding process over the last few years. The use of microwave energy in the welding process is also a very successful technique. Nowadays, microwave energy is also being used extensively in the surface cladding of materials [8]. The substrate undergoes partial dilution during cladding. Even so, microwave cladding is, at present, widely employed for surface engineering technology [9]. Microwave cladding on stainless steel employing a wide array of carbides, ceramic particles, and Ni powder has improved the material’s surface properties [10]. Microwave cladding is created by subjecting prepared powder to a “household microwave oven” with 2.45 GHz frequency and 900 W outputs for an extended length of time.
Metallic materials such as Ni have outstanding corrosion resistance properties at high temperatures and are used to make alloys, such as stainless steel. Metallic materials’ surface properties play inimitable roles in operating environments [11]. Surface coating with Ni metallic material can improve biocompatibility, oil/water separation, wear resistance, self-cleaning, anti-fouling, and corrosion resistance of stainless steel [12,13]. Further, surface coating is a competent and resource-reduction technique used to understand the metallic materials’ surface functionalization. Additionally, ceramic coating is environmentally friendly and has the merits of “mechanical durability, wear resistance, thermal stability, corrosion resistance, simple preparation and low cost” [14,15]. Ceramic materials are divided into two categories according to their compositions, namely non-oxide ceramics and oxide ceramics. Numerous oxide ceramics forms oxide films on the surface of metallic materials, which are beneficial for functional layers and the protection of metallic materials (for example, titanium alloys, stainless steel, and aluminum). Lanthanum oxide (La2O3) is rare earth element and an inorganic compound. Lanthanum oxide (La2O3) exhibits thermostability, possesses outstanding wear resistance properties, and has a wide range of applications in electronic and optics fields [16,17]. Furthermore, the corrosion resistance of La2O3 promoted its use as coating ceramic particles on steel. Similarly, Si is an extremely attractive coating material for metallic materials such as steel and is used as a corrosion and wear-resistant coating. Corrosion is usually found in steel [18]. Hence, protection against the corrosion of steel is very important for economic harmony and for the sake of the environment. A combination of Ni, La2O3, and Si coating on steel may prevent corrosion and enhance surface properties because of its good corrosion-resistance behavior [19]. A combination of Ni, La2O3, and Si provides a barrier on the surface of steel in the form of an “oxide layer” [20,21]. Due to these facts, in this study, a combination of Ni, La2O3, and Si was used so that the surface property of steel could be increased properly.
According to historical reports, only a small number of studies have employed microwave radiation to activate the mixture of Ni, Si, and La2O3 powder in the “surface cladding of SS-304”. For the cladding process, three different types of cladding particles were taken in this study, which were of Ni, Si, and La2O3 powder. However, when cladding with random weight percentages of Ni, Si, and La2O3 powder was performed, cracks and porosity were observed on the surface during cladding by the microwave technique. To avoid this problem, an attempt was made to find out the optimum microwave parameters using response surface methodology (RSM) so that a defect-free cladding layer could be obtained. The microstructure of the cladding layer, homogeneity, mechanical wear, and XRD behavior of the cladding surface were observed at an optimum combination of microwave parameters to identify the mixture of Ni, Si, and La2O3 powder cladding on SS-304.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Base Material

The basic metal used in this investigation was SS-304. Standard stainless steel 304 is often used. It has a nickel content of 8% to 10.5% and a chromium content of 18% to 20%. Austenitic stainless steel describes this material. When compared to carbon steel, it is a far less conductive substance both “thermally and electrically”. Nevertheless, SS-304 has a basic magnetic property that is lesser than that of steel. It resists corrosion far better than regular steel. Its malleability means it can be shaped for a broad range of purposes. However, corrosion in pits and crevices can develop in chloride-rich conditions. Above 60 °C, stress corrosion cracking might begin to appear. At temperatures of 870 °C in intermittent duty and 925 °C in continuous service, stainless steel 304 exhibits excellent oxidation resistance [22]. If corrosion resistance in water is a need, however, sustained exposure to temperatures between 425 and 860 °C is not suggested. Table 1 displays the observable properties of SS-304 up to 160 mm in diameter/thickness.

2.2. Primary Cladding Particle

Nickel in powdered form, with an “average particle size” of roughly 10 µm, is considered potential “cladding material”. Nickel is a transition metal that is both hard and ductile. In order to optimize the reactive surface area, nickel powder’s high chemical activity is highly beneficial [12]. However, nickel’s ability to passivate steel’s surface after coating it with a protective barrier also makes it resistant to surface corrosion. Because larger Ni pieces take longer to “react with air” under “ordinary circumstances”, an “oxide layer” is not formed on the surface, stopping any further “corrosion”. Only three other elements, “iron, cobalt, and gadolinium”, are magnetic at or near “room temperature”, making it one of the rarest of the rare. Above its “Curie temperature of 355 °C” (671 °F), “bulk nickel is no longer magnetic”. Ni, in comparison to other transition metals, has high thermal and electrical conductivity [23]. In order to determine the purity of the particles, powder XRD was performed on Ni powder used for this investigation. Figure 1 depicts the XRD pattern of Ni powder. When X-ray powder diffraction was performed on Ni powder, almost 99.9% pure Ni was detected. However, Fe phases may also be seen in the Ni powder that was chosen to be the principal cladding particles with SS-304.

2.3. Secondary Cladding Particle

Lanthanum oxide (28 µm of particle size) was used along with Ni. It is often used as a component of optical materials in some ferroelectric materials. It is also often used as feedstock for certain catalysts. La2O3 has an A-M2O3 hexagonal crystal structure at low temperatures [24]. Powder XRD of La2O3 particles used in the present study is shown in Figure 2. “Powder XRD” of “La2O3 powder” shows the “presence of La2O3 phases”.

2.4. Tertiary Cladding Particle

Silicon powder (Si) was taken as a tertiary cladding particle with an average particle size of 25 µm. It is a semiconductor and a tetravalent metalloid with a blue-grey metallic luster. It is a brittle crystalline that is solid and hard. Its melting temperature is 1414 °C. Silicon powder is inactive at normal temperatures, similar to carbon, but when heated, it reacts dynamically with the halogens (iodine, bromine, chlorine, and fluorine) to form halides and with certain metals to form silicides. Figure 3 shows the “powder XRD” of “Si powder”. “Powder XRD” shows the “presence of Si with a little amount of C”.

2.5. Development of Cladding

In this study, the “substrate (SS-304) was cleaned” with the help of “alcohol in an ultrasonic bath before deposition”. The mixture of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles was preheated at 100 °C for 24 h in a “muffle furnace”. “Preheating of the mixture” of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles was carried out to remove the “moisture content of the powder”. The preheated powder was uniformly distributed and preplaced on the “SS-304 substrate” with an “approximately uniform thickness”. However, the “interaction of microwaves” is a highly “material-dependent phenomenon”. In order to overcome the problem of the “microwave being reflected by the mixture of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles”, “clads” were developed using “charcoal” as the “susceptor material through microwave hybrid heating (MHH)” [25,26]. The schematic of MHH is shown in Figure 4. MHH was carried out in a “multimode microwave applicator” at 900 W using a “2.45 GHz frequency” [27,28].

2.6. Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

RSM was used to identify the optimum combination of microwave cladding process parameters [29,30,31]. In the present study, the central composite design (CCD) in DOE was employed for experimental work [32,33,34]. The weight percent of Si, skin depth, and irradiation time and La2O3 (wt.%) were obvious based on the “pilot-run investigation”. In the “pilot run”, the arbitrary weight percent of Si was selected as 5% for the microwave cladding process with Ni and La2O3. It was found that cladding surface hardness was not improved significantly. The weight percent of Si at 15% was found to be satisfactory. However, surface hardness significantly improved by taking 20 wt.% of SiC, along with Ni and La2O3. Further beyond the Si wt.% of 25, the surface hardness of the cladding layer began to decrease. “Keeping these facts in the mind”, the Si (wt.%) range was kept between 15–25%. Skin depth, irradiation time, and La2O3 (wt.%) ranges were decided in the same manner. Table 2 shows the “variable process parameters” of “microwave cladding with their ranges”. Table 3 shows the “design matrix table” used to conduct the experiment for surface hardness as response. Standard order (Table 3) shows the non-random sequence of the experimental runs for the fractional factorial design of the experiment in the present study.

2.7. Materials Testing Procedure

Microstructures of the clad samples were identified by taking an SEM image. Carbon tape was fixed on two sides of the clad samples, and the UHMWPE powder was sprinkled onto the surface. A light platinum, gold, or carbon coating was used (≈ 100 Å), and the clad samples were examined in an SEM chamber. A small diamond pyramid was used indenter, loaded with a small force of 100 gf for the Vickers hardness test of the clad samples [35,36]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) is the nondestructive instrument used to examine different types of substances, ranging from crystals to powders and fluids. Atoms scatter X-ray waves, first and foremost via the atoms’ electrons. XRD is used to observe the percentage of crystallinity, distinguish between crystalline and amorphous materials, detect a variety of polymorphic forms, and recognize crystalline material. A corrosion test was performed in the presence of 3.5 wt. percent NaCl over 120 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Variance for the Surface Hardness as a Response

Table 4 shows the ANOVA table used to obtain the “optimal combination of microwave cladding process parameters” for “surface hardness as a response”. In this case, Si (wt.%), skin depth, irradiation time, La2O3 (wt.%), Si (wt.%)2, skin depth2, irradiation time2, La2O3 (wt.%)2, interaction of Si (wt.%) and skin depth, interaction of Si (wt.%) and irradiation time, interaction of Si (wt.%) and La2O3 (wt.%), interaction of skin depth and irradiation time, interaction of skin depth and La2O3(wt.%), and interaction of irradiation time and La2O3 (wt.%) were significant model terms. The present result showed a ratio of 43.646. This model can be utilized to “navigate the design space”. Equation (1) shows the final equation in terms of actual factors.
Hardness (HV) = −84.39 + 9.73 × Si + 57.96 × Skin depth + 1.95 × Irradiation time + 4.05 × La2O3 − 0.16 × Si2 − 3.04 × Skin depth2 − 3.38 × 10−3 × Irradiation time2 − 0.06 × La2O32 − 0.28 × Si × Skin depth − 0.01 × Si × Irradiation time − 0.03 × Si × La2O3 − 0.18 × Skin depth × Irradiation time − 0.38 × Skin depth × La2O3 − 5.83 × 10−3 × Irradiation time × La2O3
The studentized residuals graph and the experimental predicted graph can be seen in Figure 5a,b, respectively. Through these graphs, it is known that the experiment that was conducted is correct through the design matrix table. The present study results show that both graphs appear to be plotted in a straight line of about 45 degrees.

3.2. Process Parameters Effect on Cladding Surface Hardness

3.2.1. Influence of “Silicon Powder Weight” Percent on Cladding Surface Hardness

The influence of “silicon powder weight percentage” on “surface hardness” can be seen in Figure 6a–c. A steady increase in surface hardness was observed when the weight percent of Si powder was taken up to the middle of the selected range. However, when the weight precept was further increased, surface hardness began to decrease. The reason for this may be that the increase in the weight percentage of Si caused some defects to arise during the “formation of the cladding layer”, due to which a “decrease in surface hardness” was observed [36,37,38].

3.2.2. Effect of Skin Depth of the Major Constituent on Cladding Surface Hardness

The effect of skin depth of the major constituent on surface hardness can be observed in Figure 6a,d,e. The value of surface hardness came out best when the “skin depth of the major constituent” was placed approximately between the selected process parameters (4 µm to 5 µm). Having a higher “skin depth of the major constituent” increases the chances of cracking of the substrate during the “cladding process”, resulting in a decrease in the “hardness of the surface” [39,40,41]. Therefore, during the cladding process, it is kept in mind that the “skin depth of the major constituent” should neither be too high nor too low. Keeping the “skin depth of the major constituent” low, sometimes proper cladding does not occur, due to which the required increase in surface hardness is not achieved.

3.2.3. Effect of Irradiation Time on Cladding Surface Hardness

The influence of irradiation time on “surface hardness” is displayed in Figure 6b,d,f. It is visible from Figure 6b,d,f that surface hardness also increases by increasing irradiation time. Microwave irradiation gives more time for cladding particles to bond with the surface, due to which the cladding surface is properly formed [42,43,44].

3.2.4. Effect of La2O3 Powder Weight Percent on Cladding Surface Hardness

It can be seen from Figure 6c,e,f that surface hardness continuously increases when the weight percentage of La2O3 increases. The reason for this is that La2O3 itself is a very hard particle and when its weight percent increases, it tries to increase the hardness of the substrate very well [45,46,47].

3.3. Microwave Cladding Optimum Parameters and Contribution

Figure 7 shows the “ramp function graph” for the “microwave cladding input parameters”. The “ramp function graph results” exhibit that if the values of Si (wt.%), skin depth of the major constituent, irradiation time, and La2O3 (wt.%) are about 19.28, 4.57 µm, 118 s, and 11, respectively, then the value of cladding surface hardness should be 287.25 HV with a desirability of 1. The prominence of the “microwave cladding parameters” can be ranked based on their F ratio as exhibited in Table 5 (ANOVA table). It can be inferred that La2O3 (wt.%) contributes the most, followed by Si (wt.%), irradiation time, and skin depth of the major constituent, as shown in Figure 8.

3.4. Metallurgical and Tribo-Corrosion Behaviour at Optimum Microwave Process Parameters

Microwave cladding of SS-304 was carried out at optimum microwave cladding process parameters (Si (wt.%) of 19.28, skin depth of 4.57 µm, and irradiation time of 118 s and La2O3 (wt.%) of 11). Figure 9 shows the photograph of the “microwave clad samples” developed at “optimum microwave process parameters”. Surface hardness, microstructure investigation, XRD behavior, wear behavior, and corrosion behavior of developed samples at optimum microwave process parameters (Si (wt.%) of 19.28, skin depth of 4.57 µm, irradiation time of 118 s, and La2O3 (wt.%) of 11) have been discussed as shown below.

3.4.1. Surface Hardness

The experimental surface hardness (average for five test samples) corresponding to the microwave cladding process parameters (Si (wt.%) of 19.28, skin depth of 4.57 µm, Irradiation time of 118 s, and La2O3 (wt.%) of 11) was found to be 279 HV. The ramp function graph shows that the theoretical value of surface hardness at the optimum microwave cladding process parameters is 287.25 HV. The results indicate that there is only a 2.96% error in the experimental and mathematical model results. The average hardness of the SS-304 alloy was observed to be 210HV. The outcomes exhibit that there is about a 32.85% enhancement in the “hardness of SS-304 alloy” after the “microwave cladding of the mixture” of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on “SS-304 at optimum process parameters” [29,30,31]. In Figure 10a–d, the SEM image displays the "microwave clad samples" produced using a "mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles" on "SS-304" that was developed under optimal cladding parameters. The surface of the "SS-304" exhibits a uniform distribution of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles. Additionally, the presence of La2O3 powder is visible on the steel surface. As demonstrated in Figure 11a–d, the use of Ni and Si powder as a coating material is effective in enhancing the surface properties of steel. The numerous “hard and carbide phases” developed after “microwave cladding”, such as the Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases (Figure 12a–c), were accountable for ornamental hardness [48,49,50].

3.4.2. Microstructure Investigation

Figure 10a–d shows the SEM image of the “microwave clad samples” developed using the “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”. “Uniform distribution of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles” can be observed on the “surface of SS-304”. The presence of La2O3 powder can be observed on the surface of the steel. “Ni and Si powder” itself is a “good coating material” that enhances the “surface property of steel” (Figure 11a–d). Figure 12a–c shows the “SEM image of the cladding layer and cladding surface”. Figure 12a,b show the “uniform cladding layer” with “fewer dark pixels” (yielding higher homogeneity). The uniform cladding layer and cladding surface were obtained by maintaining the optimum microwave parameters (Si (wt.%) of 19.28, skin depth of 4.57 µm, and Irradiation time of 118 s, and La2O3 (wt.%) of 11). By retaining the best microwave settings, a uniform cladding layer and surface were produced. The created cladding surface’s dimensional deviation was minimized with increased “cladding layer and cladding surface homogeneity” [30,31]. The hardness of the cladding surface is better distributed when there is less variation in its dimensions. The wear resistance and average hardness of the produced surface are both improved by uniform hardness distribution over the cladding surface. Some fissures between the cladding layer and substrate are seen in Figure 12c. Inconsistent variations in powder and microwave settings may have led to the development of the fracture [51,52,53]. Because of fissures that formed amid the “cladding layer and the substrate”, wear resistance was reduced. On the other hand, formed fissures between the cladding layer and substrate may also reduce hardness [54,55,56].

3.4.3. XRD Behavior

XRD is a prevailing nondestructive method intended to distinguish crystalline materials. It gives information of crystal defects, strain, crystallinity, average grain size, texture, phases, and structures [57,58,59]. Figure 13 shows the XRD of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”. XRD of cladded surface shows the presence of FeNi, Ni2Si, FeNi3, NiSi2, Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases. The “formation of hard and carbide phases”, such as the Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases, were accountable for ornamental “hardness of SS-304 alloy” after the “cladding of the mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” [32,33,34].

3.4.4. Wear Behavior

For the wear test, a “pin-on-disc machine” with a “sliding speed of 2 m/s, a sliding distance of 1000 m, and an axial load of 5 N” was used. The “wear rate and coefficient of friction” of the developed “cladded surface” with “69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” were observed to be 0.00367 mm3/m and 0.312, respectively, which is appropriate to be utilized anywhere. Nevertheless, the foremost purpose for “good wear resistance” is the “use of La2O3 with Ni and Si powder” in the development of the “cladding surface” [60,61,62]. The development of “hard phases such as Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases” (Figure 12) on the “surface of SS-304” with “microwave cladding of the mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” was responsible for increased “wear resistance”. However, “La2O3 is a hard particle” whose presence always promotes “wear resistance of the material”. Wear behavior of the cladding surface of steel depends on many factors, such as cladding thickness, adhesion of cladding to the substrate, layers form after cladding, microstructure (number and size of defects, phases, and grain sizes), thermal properties of cladding and substrate, mechanical properties of cladding and substrate (fatigue strength, tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and hardness), and surface roughness.

3.4.5. Corrosion Behavior

In the “existence of 3.5 wt. percent NaCl” over 120 h, the “corrosion test of SS-304” with “microwave cladding” of a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” was conducted. “Corrosion weight loss of SS-304” with “microwave cladding” of a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” was found to be 0.49 mg. Figure 14a,b shows the “SEM image of the corroded surface”. “Few dark spots” may be observed on the “corroded surface”. These “dark spots” indicate some “corrosion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl environment”.

4. Conclusions

The subsequent points can be concluded from the current work:
  • The “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” can be utilized on “SS-304 alloy for microwave cladding via microwave energy”.
  • RSM results show that if the values of Si (wt.%), skin depth of the major constituent, irradiation time, and La2O3 (wt.%) are about 19.28, 4.57 µm, 118 s, and 11, respectively, then the value of cladding surface hardness should be 287.25 HV with a desirability of 1. The ANOVA table shows that La2O3 (wt.%) contributes the most, followed by Si (wt.%), irradiation time, and skin depth of the major constituent.
  • An SEM image of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters” showed “uniform distribution of Ni, Si, and La2O3 particles”. A “Uniform cladding-layer” with “fewer dark pixels” was observed in between the “substrate and cladding surface”.
  • XRD of the cladded surface shows the presence of FeNi, Ni2Si, FeNi3, NiSi2, Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases.
  • The “hardness of the cladding surface” was enhanced by about 32.85%. The foremost purpose for the enhancement in “hardness is the various hard phases”, developed after “microwave cladding such as Ni3C, NiC, and La2O3 phases”.
  • The “wear rate and coefficient of friction” of developed “cladded surfaces” with a mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters were found to be 0.00367 mm3/m and 0.312, respectively.
  • “Few dark spots” were observed on the “corroded surface of SS-304” with the “microwave cladding of the mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles”. These “dark spots” displayed some “corrosion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl environment”.
  • Steel plate coating with 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 may be used in the application of condensers for power plants; central air conditioning; and tube sheets used for heat exchangers, reactor columns, and pressure vessels in the oil and gas chemical industries, such as those used in storage tanks, etc.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P.D. and S.S.; methodology, S.P.D. and S.S.; formal analysis, S.P.D. and S.S.; investigation, S.P.D. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.D. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S., K.P.S., A.K., A.A., R.S. and S.M.E.; supervision, S.S., K.P.S., A.K., A.A., R.S., and S.M.E.; project administration, S.S., K.P.S., A.K., A.A., R.S., and S.M.E.; funding acquisition, S.S. and S.M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, A.K.; Aravindhan, S.; Krishnamurthy, R. Microwaveglazing of alumina–titania ceramic composite coatings. Mater Lett. 2011, 50, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, S.; Zeng, X.; Qianwu, H.; Huang, S. Analysis of crackbehavior for Ni-based WC composite coatings by lasercladding and crack-free realization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 1646–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leonelli, R.C.; Veronesi, P.; Denti, L.; Gatto, A.; Iuliano, L. Microwaveassisted sintering of green metal parts. J. Mater. Process Technol. 2008, 205, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mateos, J.; Cuetos, J.M.; Fernandez, E.; Vijande, R. Tribologicalbehavior of plasma-sprayed WC coatings with and withoutlaser remelting. Wear 2000, 239, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roy Agrawal, D.; Cheng, J.; Gedevanishvili, S. Full sintering of powdered-metal bodies in a microwave field. Nature 1999, 339, 668–670. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mondal, A.; Upadhyaya, A.; Agrawal, D. Microwave sintering ofrefractory metals/alloys. J. Microw. Power Electromagn Energy 2009, 44, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chhillar, P.; Agrawal, D.; Adair, J.H. Sintering of molybdenummetal powder using microwave energy. Powder Met. 2008, 51, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zambon, A.; Ramous, E. Laser beam energy absorptionenhancement by means of coatings. Laser Eng. 1993, 2, 163–167. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gupta, D.; Sharma, A.K.; Bhovi, P.M.; Dutta, S. Development andcharacterization of microwave composite cladding. J. Manuf. Process 2012, 14, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Badigera, R.I.; Narendranath, S.; Srinath, M.S. Joining ofInconel-625 alloy through microwave hybrid heating and itscharacterization. J. Manuf. Process 2015, 18, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Toozandehjani, M.; Ostovan, F.; Jamaludin, K.R.; Amrin, A.; Matori, K.A.; Shafiei, E. Process−microstructure−properties relationship in Al−CNTs−Al2O3 nanocomposites manufactured by hybrid powder metallurgy and microwave sintering process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2020, 30, 2339–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amiri, E.; Ostovan, F.; Toozandehjani, M.; Shafiei, E.; Mohamed, I.F. Study and selection of most appropriate filler rod for GTAW of S32750 super duplex steel joints: A comprehensive study on microstructural, mechanical and corrosion properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 270, 124839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ostovan, F.; Shafiei, E.; Toozandehjani, M.; Mohamed, I.F.; Soltani, M. On the role of molybdenum on the microstructural, mechanical and corrosion properties of the GTAW AISI 316 stainless steel welds. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 13, 2115–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, S.K.; Chattopadhyaya, S.; Pramanik, A.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, S.M.; Walia, R.; Sharma, S.; Khan, A.M.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Singh, S.; et al. Effect of alumina oxide nano-powder on the wear behaviour of CrN coating against cylinder liner using response surface methodology: Processing and characterizations. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 16, 1102–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, G.; Sharma, S.; Mittal, M.; Singh, G.; Singh, J.; Changhe, L.; Khan, A.M.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Mushtaq, R.T.; Singh, S. Impact of post-heat-treatment on the surface-roughness, residual stresses, and micromorphology characteristics of plasma-sprayed pure hydroxyapatite and 7%-Aloxite reinforced hydroxyapatite coatings deposited on titanium alloy-based biomedical implants. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 1358–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, B.; Zafar, S. Microwave cladding for slurry erosion resistance applications: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2686–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prasad, C.D.; Lingappa, M.S.; Joladarashi, S.; Ramesh, M.; Sachin, B. Characterization and sliding wear behavior of CoMoCrSi + Flyash composite cladding processed by microwave irradiation. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2387–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, B.; Zafar, S. Understanding time-temperature characteristics in microwave cladding. Manuf. Lett. 2020, 25, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vishwanatha, J.; Hebbale, A.M.; Kumar, N.; Srinath, M.; Badiger, R.I. ANOVA studies and control factors effect analysis of cobalt based microwave clad. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 2409–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, K.P.; Mohanty, A.; Lingappa, M.S.; Srinath, M.; Panigrahi, S. Enhancement of surface properties of austenitic stainless steel by nickel based alloy cladding developed using microwave energy technique. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 256, 123657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, G.; Mittal, M.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Chohan, J.; Kumar, R. Effect of post coating processing on the morphological and mechanical properties of plasma Spray-reinforced hydroxyapatite coating. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 68, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Janney, M.A.; Calhoun, C.L.; Kimrey, H.D. Microwave sintering ofsolid oxide fuel cell materials. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1992, 75, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rocha, O.L.; Siqueira, C.A.; Garcia, A. Cellular spacing’s inunsteady-state directionally solidified Sn–Pb alloys. MaterSci. Eng. A 2003, 361, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kunlin, W.; Qingbo, Z.; Xingguo, W.; Yunming, Z. Rare-earthLa2O3modification of laser-clad coatings. J. Mater Sci. 1998, 33, 3573–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tlotleng, M.; Akinlabi, E.; Shukla, M.; Pityana, S. Microstructure, hardness and bioactivity of hydroxyapatite coatingsdeposited by direct laser melting process. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 43, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, J.; Chen, G.; Chen, Z.; Mu, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Qu, X.; Qin, X. Effects of doping route on microstructure and mechanical properties of W−1.0wt.%La2O3 alloys. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2020, 30, 3296–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dwivedi, S.P.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, S. Identification of Microwave Radiation Effect on Copper Welded Joint with Brass as Filler Material Using Response Surface Methodology. Mater. Perform. Charact. 2020, 9, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dwivedi, S.P.; Sharma, S.; Singh, T.; Kumar, N. Mechanical and Metallurgical Characterization of Copper-Based Welded Joint Using Brass as Filler Metal Developed by Microwave Technique. Ann. De Chim.-Sci. Des. Matériaux. 2020, 44, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, G.; Mittal, M.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Gill, A.; Chohan, J.; Kumar, R.; Joshi, A. Study on the morphological and mechanical properties of TaC reinforced plasma spray coating deposited on titanium alloy. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 68, A22–A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ganeshkumar, S.; Singh, B.K.; Kumar, S.D.; Gokulkumar, S.; Sharma, S.; Mausam, K.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tag Eldin, E.M. Study of Wear, Stress and Vibration Characteristics of Silicon Carbide Tool Inserts and Nano Multi-Layered Titanium Nitride-CoatedCutting Tool Inserts in Turning of SS304 Steels. Materials 2022, 15, 7994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Amer, A.; Abdelsalam, A.; Aryanfar, Y.; Assad, M.E.H.; Sharma, S.; Alayi, R. Reducing PV soiling and condensation using hydrophobic coating with brush and controllable curtains. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2022, 17, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, Y.; Sharma, S.; Singh, G.; Singh, G.; Singh, J.; Dwivedi, S.P.; Singh, S.; Kumar, R.; Chattopadhyaya, S.; Li, C. Studies on Physical, Micro-structural, and Slurry Erosion behaviour of Cold Sprayed Ni-20Cr+TiC+Re Coatings on SA516 steel for high-temperature applications. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Tameemi, H.A.; Al-Dulaimi, T.; Awe, M.O.; Sharma, S.; Pimenov, D.Y.; Koklu, U.; Giasin, K. Evaluation of Cutting-Tool Coating on the Surface Roughness and Hole Dimensional Tolerances during Drilling of Al6061-T651 Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sharma, S.; Dong, X.N.; Wei, P.; Long, C. Electro-Chemical Deposited Cu-Ni Binary and Cu-Ni-Mn Ternary Alloys from Sulphate Bath for Anti-Corrosive Coating Applications in Brine Environment: Effect of Corrosion Behaviour, Polarization Studies, Morphological and Structural Characterizations. Key Eng. Mater. 2020, 837, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sheng, C.; He, G.; Hu, Z.; Chou, C.; Shi, J.; Li, J.; Meng, Q.; Ning, X.; Wang, L.; Ning, F. Yarn on yarn abrasion failure mechanism of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fiber. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2021, 16, 1925832385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ning, F.; He, G.; Sheng, C.; He, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, R.; Ning, X. Yarn on yarn abrasion performance of high modulus polyethylene fiber improved by graphene/polyurethane composites coating. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2021, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuhua, C.; Yuqing, M.; Weiwei, L.; Peng, H. Investigation of welding crack in micro laser welded NiTiNb shape memory alloy and Ti6Al4V alloy dissimilar metals joints. Opt. Laser Technol. 2017, 91, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deng, H.; Chen, Y.; Jia, Y.; Pang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, S.; Yin, L. Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar NiTi/Ti6Al4V joints via back-heating assisted friction stir welding. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 64, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Long, X.; Guo, Y.; Su, Y.; Siow, K.S.; Chen, C. Unveiling the damage evolution of SAC305 during fatigue by entropy generation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2023, 244, 108087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, H.; Zhao, R. Isolated Ni atoms induced edge stabilities and equilibrium shapes of CVD-prepared hexagonal boron nitride on Ni(111) surface. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 17496–17504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, B.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Zheng, X. Inter-component synergetic corrosion inhibition mechanism of Passiflora edulia Sims shell extract for mild steel in pickling solution: Experimental, DFT and reactive dynamics investigations. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 29, 100821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shi, J.; Zhao, B.; He, T.; Tu, L.; Lu, X.; Xu, H. Tribology and dynamic characteristics of textured journal-thrust coupled bearing considering thermal and pressure coupled effects. Tribol. Int. 2023, 180, 108292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, P.; Liu, Z.; Yue, X.; Wang, P.; Zhai, Y. Water jet impact damage mechanism and dynamic penetration energy absorption of 2A12 aluminum alloy. Vacuum 2022, 206, 111532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, P.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.; Mai, Q.; Yue, X. Effect of aging plus cryogenic treatment on the machinability of 7075 aluminum alloy. Vacuum 2023, 208, 111692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fan, X.; Wei, G.; Lin, X.; Wang, X.; Si, Z.; Zhang, X.; Shao, Q.; Mangin, S.; Fullerton, E.; Jiang, L.; et al. Reversible Switching of Interlayer Exchange Coupling through Atomically Thin VO2 via Electronic State Modulation. Matter 2020, 2, 1582–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, K.; Gou, G.; Lv, H.; Shan, M. Jointing of CFRP/5083 Aluminum Alloy by Induction Brazing: Processing, Connecting Mechanism, and Fatigue Performance. Coatings 2022, 12, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fu, Z.; Yang, B.; Shan, M.; Li, T.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, C.; Zhang, X.; Gou, G.; Wang, Z.; Gao, W. Hydrogen embrittlement behavior of SUS301L-MT stainless steel laser-arc hybrid welded joint localized zones. Corros. Sci. 2020, 164, 108337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.L.; Gou, G.Q.; Gao, W.; Chen, J. Effect of heat input on interfacial characterization of the butter joint of hot-rolling CP-Ti/Q235 bimetallic sheets by Laser + CMT. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, Q.; Chen, J.; Gou, G.; Chen, H.; Li, P. Ameliorated longitudinal critically refracted—Attenuation velocity method for welding residual stress measurement. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 246, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Niu, X.; Zhu, S.-P.; He, J.-C.; Liao, D.; Correia, J.A.; Berto, F.; Wang, Q. Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: Size effect and probabilistic prospects. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 160, 106884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. He, J.; Zhu, S.; Luo, C.; Niu, X.; Wang, Q. Size effect in fatigue modelling of defective materials: Application of the calibrated weakest-link theory. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 165, 107213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, X.-K.; Zhu, S.-P.; Liao, D.; Correia, J.A.; Berto, F.; Wang, Q. Probabilistic fatigue modelling of metallic materials under notch and size effect using the weakest link theory. Int. J. Fatigue 2022, 159, 106788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, H.; He, T.; Zhong, N.; Zhao, B.; Liu, Z. Transient thermomechanical analysis of micro cylindrical asperity sliding contact of SnSbCu alloy. Tribol. Int. 2022, 167, 107362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Jia, H. Hybrid Dynamic Modeling and Analysis of High-Speed Thin-Rimmed Gears. ASME. J. Mech. Des. 2021, 143, 123401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liang, L.; Xu, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, T.; Tong, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Li, H. Effect of welding thermal treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based superalloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2021, 819, 141507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, J.; Mao, S.; Song, S.; Huang, L.; Belfiore, L.A.; Tang, J. Towards applicable photoacoustic micro-fluidic pumps: Tunable excitation wavelength and improved stability by fabrication of Ag-Au alloying nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 884, 161091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhao, J.; Gao, J.; Li, W.; Qian, Y.; Shen, X.; Wang, X.; Shen, X.; Hu, Z.; Dong, C.; Huang, Q.; et al. A combinatory ferroelectric compound bridging simple ABO3 and A-site-ordered quadruple perovskite. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Z.; Yang, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Ma, Q. Influence of CeO2 addition on forming quality and microstructure of TiCx-reinforced CrTi4-based laser cladding composite coating. Mater. Charact. 2021, 171, 110732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, T. Influence of Y2O3 addition on the microstructure of TiC reinforced Ti-based composite coating prepared by laser cladding. Mater. Charact. 2022, 189, 111962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dong, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Nie, Z.; Ma, H.; Liu, Q.; Li, J. First-Principles Study on the Adsorption Characteristics of Corrosive Species on Passive Film TiO2 in a NaCl Solution Containing H2S and CO2. Metals 2022, 12, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Singh, G.; Vasudev, H.; Bansal, A.; Vardhan, S.; Sharma, S. Microwave cladding of Inconel-625 on mild steel substrate for corrosion protection. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 026512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Singh, G.; Sharma, S.; Singh, J.; Aggarwal, V.; Mayilswamy, S. Influence of Nickel-Based Cladding on the Hardness and Wear Behavior of Hard-Faced Mild Steel Using E-7014 Electrode Using Shielded Metal Arc Welding; CRC Press-Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-0-367-52106-6. [Google Scholar]
Materials 16 02209 g001 550
Figure 1. Powder XRD of Ni powder.
Figure 1. Powder XRD of Ni powder.
Materials 16 02209 g001
Materials 16 02209 g002 550
Figure 2. Powder XRD of La2O3 powder.
Figure 2. Powder XRD of La2O3 powder.
Materials 16 02209 g002
Materials 16 02209 g003 550
Figure 3. Powder XRD of Si powder.
Figure 3. Powder XRD of Si powder.
Materials 16 02209 g003
Materials 16 02209 g004 550
Figure 4. Experimental procedure.
Figure 4. Experimental procedure.
Materials 16 02209 g004
Materials 16 02209 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Studentized residuals graph; (b) actual vs. predicted graph.
Figure 5. (a) Studentized residuals graph; (b) actual vs. predicted graph.
Materials 16 02209 g005
Materials 16 02209 g006 550
Figure 6. (a–f). Process Parameters Effect on Surface Hardness.
Figure 6. (a–f). Process Parameters Effect on Surface Hardness.
Materials 16 02209 g006
Materials 16 02209 g007 550
Figure 7. Ramp function graph for the input parameters Si (wt.%), skin depth, irradiation time, La2O3 (wt.%).
Figure 7. Ramp function graph for the input parameters Si (wt.%), skin depth, irradiation time, La2O3 (wt.%).
Materials 16 02209 g007
Materials 16 02209 g008 550
Figure 8. Percent Contribution of Input Parameters.
Figure 8. Percent Contribution of Input Parameters.
Materials 16 02209 g008
Materials 16 02209 g009 550
Figure 9. Photograph of the microwave clad samples.
Figure 9. Photograph of the microwave clad samples.
Materials 16 02209 g009
Materials 16 02209 g010 550
Figure 10. (a–d). SEM images of the “microwave clad samples” with mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Figure 10. (a–d). SEM images of the “microwave clad samples” with mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Materials 16 02209 g010
Materials 16 02209 g011 550
Figure 11. (a–d). SEM images of the “cladding layer surface” developed using a mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Figure 11. (a–d). SEM images of the “cladding layer surface” developed using a mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Materials 16 02209 g011
Materials 16 02209 g012 550
Figure 12. (a–c). SEM image of “cladding layer and cladding surface” of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Figure 12. (a–c). SEM image of “cladding layer and cladding surface” of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Materials 16 02209 g012
Materials 16 02209 g013 550
Figure 13. XRD of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Figure 13. XRD of the “microwave clad samples” developed using a “mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles” on “SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters”.
Materials 16 02209 g013
Materials 16 02209 g014 550
Figure 14. (a,b). Surface morphology of corroded clad sample developed using a mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters.
Figure 14. (a,b). Surface morphology of corroded clad sample developed using a mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles on SS-304 developed at optimum cladding parameters.
Materials 16 02209 g014
Table
Table 1. Properties of SS-304.
Table 1. Properties of SS-304.
S. No.PropertiesValues
1“Density (g/cm3)”8
2“Tensile Strength (MPa)”615
3“Melting Temperature (Degree centigrade)”1450
4“Vickers hardness (HV)”210
Table
Table 2. Variable process parameters with their ranges.
Table 2. Variable process parameters with their ranges.
S. No.Input ParametersRange
1Si (wt.%)15–25
2The skin depth (µm)4–5
3Irradiation time (s)90–120
4La2O3
(wt.%)		10–20
Table
Table 3. Design Matrix Table.
Table 3. Design Matrix Table.
Standard OrderRunA: Si (wt.%)B: The Skin Depth of the Major Constituent of the Hard-Facing Powder (µm)C: Irradiation Time (s)D: La2O3 (wt.%)Surface Hardness (HV)
14125412020280
1022549020276
183304.510515274
442559010285
252549010281
256204.510515286
13715412020277
288204.510515286
219204.57515279
1910203.510515281
1711104.510515265
2912204.510515284
2313204.51055285
161425512020275
2215204.513515285
2616204.510515284
12172559020277
2718204.510515284
3191559010278
82025512010285
62125412010286
2422204.510525274
2023205.510515283
9241549020270
52515412010280
11261559020273
72715512010282
1281549010271
152915512020275
3030204.510515286
Table
Table 4. ANOVA Table.
Table 4. ANOVA Table.
“Source”“Sum of Squares”“DF”“Mean Square”“F Value”“Prob > F”
Model910.28333331465.0202381137.689916<0.0001significant
A135.3751135.375286.6764706<0.0001
B7.04166666717.04166666714.911764710.0015
C70.04166667170.04166667148.3235294<0.0001
D187.04166671187.0416667396.0882353<0.0001
A2414.07440481414.0744048876.8634454<0.0001
B215.86011905115.8601190533.58613445<0.0001
C215.86011905115.8601190533.58613445<0.0001
D252.64583333152.64583333111.4852941<0.0001
AB7.562517.562516.014705880.0012
AC14.0625114.062529.77941176<0.0001
AD10.5625110.562522.367647060.0003
BC27.5625127.562558.36764706<0.0001
BD14.0625114.062529.77941176<0.0001
CD3.062513.06256.4852941180.0223
“Residual”7.083333333150.472222222
“Lack of Fit”1.083333333100.1083333330.0902777780.9992not significant
“Pure Error”651.2
“Cor Total”917.366666729
“Std. Dev.”0.687184271 “R-Squared”0.992278624
“Mean”279.5666667 “Adj R-Squared”0.985072006
“C.V.”0.245803364 “Pred R-Squared”0.983779659
“PRESS”14.88 “Adeq Precision”43.64638992
Table
Table 5. Wear and friction behavior of SS-304 with and without cladding of the mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles at a sliding speed of 2 m/s and a sliding distance of 1000 m.
Table 5. Wear and friction behavior of SS-304 with and without cladding of the mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 particles at a sliding speed of 2 m/s and a sliding distance of 1000 m.
Axial LoadWear Rate (mm3/m)Friction
SS-304The Mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 Particles Cladding on SS-304SS-304The Mixture of 69.72% Ni, 19.28% Si, and 11% La2O3 Particles Cladding on SS-304
2.50.004110.002920.0910.294
50.004560.003670.09560.312
7.50.004710.003970.09870.345
100.004900.004010.09940.398
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dwivedi, S.P.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, K.P.; Kumar, A.; Agrawal, A.; Singh, R.; Eldin, S.M. The Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Si-La2O3 Coatings Deposited on 304 Stainless Steel by Microwave Cladding. Materials 2023, 16, 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062209

AMA Style

Dwivedi SP, Sharma S, Sharma KP, Kumar A, Agrawal A, Singh R, Eldin SM. The Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Si-La2O3 Coatings Deposited on 304 Stainless Steel by Microwave Cladding. Materials. 2023; 16(6):2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dwivedi, Shashi Prakash, Shubham Sharma, Kanta Prasad Sharma, Abhinav Kumar, Ashish Agrawal, Rajesh Singh, and Sayed M. Eldin. 2023. "The Microstructure and Properties of Ni-Si-La2O3 Coatings Deposited on 304 Stainless Steel by Microwave Cladding" Materials 16, no. 6: 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop