Next Article in Journal
Influence of Low Temperature Plasma Oxidizing on the Bioactivity of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy for Medical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Wire and Arc Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Material
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Synthesis, Structure, and Luminescent Properties of TmMgB5O10 Crystals

by
Elena A. Volkova
1,*,
Victor V. Maltsev
1,
Alexander M. Antipin
2,
Dina V. Deyneko
3,
Ivan V. Nikiforov
3,
Dmitry A. Spassky
4,5,
Ekaterina I. Marchenko
1,
Diana D. Mitina
1,
Vladimir L. Kosorukov
1,
Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt
1,
Daniil A. Naprasnikov
1 and
Elizaveta V. Koporulina
1,6
1
Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, The Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
5
Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
6
Melnikov Research Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources, The Russian Academy of Sciences, 111020 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(18), 6084; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186084
Submission received: 10 August 2023 / Revised: 28 August 2023 / Accepted: 2 September 2023 / Published: 6 September 2023

Abstract

:
TmMgB5O10 spontaneous crystals were synthesized via the flux-growth technique from a K2Mo3O10-based solvent. The crystal structure of the compound was solved and refined within the space group P21/n. The first principles calculations of the electronic structure reveal that TmMg-pentaborate with an ideal not defected crystal structure is an insulator with an indirect energy band gap of approximately 6.37 eV. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements and powder X-ray diffraction studies of heat-treated solids show that TmMgB5O10 is an incongruent melting compound. A characteristic band of the Tm3+ cation corresponding to the 3H61D2 transition is observed in the photoluminescence excitation spectra of TmMg-borate. The as-obtained crystals exhibit intense blue emission with the emission peaks centered at 455, 479, 667, and 753 nm. The most intensive band corresponds to the 1D23F4 transition. TmMgB5O10 solids demonstrate the thermal stability of photoluminescence.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, a large amount of research has focused on the development of materials used as environmentally friendly light sources and phosphors, as well as laser and nonlinear optical materials. Future progress in science and technology is directly related to the search and further application of new compounds, as well as to the improvement of the parameters of existing materials. One of the promising classes of such compounds is rare-earth borates, which demonstrate high chemical stability, thermal and radiation resistance, wide transparency area, high laser threshold, etc. In addition, borates have a wide variety of chemical compositions and crystal structures due to the ability of the boron atom to form various anionic and polyanionic groups [1]. Nowadays, the search for borate materials that can be used as phosphors is an actual problem. There are many borate crystals that do not exhibit luminescent properties in their pure form, and their luminescent characteristics are associated with doping, such as the incorporation of rare-earth or transition metal cations into their structure.
In particular, among numerous borates, a group of rare-earth magnesium pentaborates can be used as phosphors to create powerful emitters of the visible range with ultraviolet (UV) excitation [2,3]. Rare-earth magnesium borates with the general chemical formula LnMgB5O10 (where Ln = La, Ce-Nd, and Sm-Er) were first synthesized by Saubat et al. in 1980 by the solid-phase method. LaMgB5O10 single crystals were then obtained by melting a mixture of La2O3, MgO, and B2O3 at 1200 °C with an excess of magnesium and boron oxides with respect to the stoichiometric amount to compensate for volatilization losses. The crystal structure of LaMgB5O10 was solved and refined within the space group (sp. gr.) P21/c [4]. The powder patterns of other polycrystalline LnMgB5O10 samples were also indexed in the same space group. These materials exhibit remarkable structural features: a weak atomic Ln/O ratio, well-isolated Ln chains separated by large polyborate anions, and a highly covalent matrix suggest the possibility of relatively low-concentration quenching. LnMgB5O10 is expected to be an excellent material as a phosphor host and a matrix for solid-state lasers.
The luminescent properties of this group of compounds were first described by the authors of [5,6] for LaMgB5O10 alloyed with Eu3+, Tb3+, and Ce3+. The luminescence parameters of Ce3+:LaMgB5O10 and Ce3+:YMgB5O10 powders [7], nanocrystalline (La,Gd)MgB5O10:Ce3+/Tb3+ thin films synthesized by the sol–gel method [8], and LaMgB5O10-based glasses, doped with Ce3+, Tb3+, and Mn2+ were studied later [9]. Recently, data on the luminescence of LaMg-pentaborate crystals doped with Tb3+ and Eu3+ ions were obtained by the authors of Ref. [3]. There are also a number of investigations on the characterization of large-size and high-quality LaMgB5O10, GdMgB5O10, and YMgB5O10 laser crystals doped with Yb3+, Er3+, and Nd3+ (see, for example, Refs. [5,6,7,8,9]). Based on an analysis of spectra and laser characteristics, it was shown that these borates are promising candidates for multi-wavelength laser crystals.
A review of previous studies on the synthesis and crystal growth of rare-earth pentaborates shows that the Li2O–B2O3–LiF mixed flux is the most commonly used to obtain LnMgB5O10 compounds by the solution growth on dipped seeds technique [10,11]. Recently, GdMgB5O10 single crystals were obtained from K2Mo3O10 flux [12]. The authors of Ref. [13] performed experiments in Li2O–B2O3–LiF- and K2Mo3O10-based systems to determine the most suitable one for the growth of LnMgB5O10 bulk crystals. It was shown that the K2Mo3O10 flux is preferable. The strong tendency of Li2O-B2O3-LiF melts toward glass formation, and the high volatility and reactivity of fluorides at high temperatures make reproducible growth of high-quality crystals difficult. It was also proposed to use pre-synthesized LnMgB5O10 tablets as a crystal-forming agent instead of the mixture of corresponding Ln2O3–MgO–B2O3 oxides.
Spontaneous TmMgB5O10 (TmMB) single crystals were obtained for the first time in the framework of the approach described in [13]. The present work is focused on the synthesis and study of the crystal structure, thermal behavior, and luminescent properties of TmMgB5O10 crystals.

2. Materials and Methods

Two subsequent routes were applied to obtain TmMg-borate: solid-state synthesis and flux-growth techniques. In both cases, a vertical resistance-heated furnace equipped with a Proterm-100 precision temperature controller and a set of Pt/Rh-Pt thermocouples was used. Tm2O3 (99.996%), H3BO3 (A.C.S. grade), and MgO (A.C.S. grade) were used as crystal-forming agents for the solid-state synthesis of polycrystalline TmMB. Calculated amounts of Tm2O3, MgO, and H3BO3 were weighted, mixed together, and pressed into tablets 15 mm in diameter. The compact TmMB tablets were heated in an alundum crucible at the temperature of 900 °C for 72 h, and then a furnace was gradually cooled to room temperature.
In solid-phase synthesis, crystal-forming components were initially weighed corresponding to the composition of TmMgB5O10. As a result, only the TmBO3 phase was formed. According to the Le Chatelier principle, an excess of one of the components shifts the direction of the reaction toward the formation of the desired phase. Further experiments were carried out using a non-stoichiometric load with 100% excess of MgO. This approach led to the formation of a nearly monophase TmMgB5O10 sample at 900 °C.
Spontaneous TmMB crystals were obtained from a high-temperature K2Mo3O10-based flux melt. The K2Mo3O10 solvent used was a stoichiometric mixture of K2MoO4 (A.C.S. grade) and MoO3 (A.C.S. grade). TmMB previously synthesized by the solid-state technique was taken as a crystal-forming component. A thoroughly mixed starting charge with a crystal phase-to-flux weight ratio of 30:70 wt.% was loaded into a 15 mL platinum crucible, placed in a furnace, heated to 900 °C and held for 24 h to ensure complete homogenization of the solution. Subsequently, the flux melt was cooled to 800 °C at a rate of 1 °C/h, followed by cooling at 10 °C/h to 300 °C.
K2Mo3O10-based solvents seem to be the most suitable for the growth of different borate crystals. Nevertheless, LnMgB5O10 solids dissolve incongruently in a K2Mo3O10 melt, and reactions between K2Mo3O10 and LnMgB5O10 result in new crystalline phases, mostly crystal-forming oxides, as well as LnBO3. The formation temperatures of these co-crystallizing phases depend on the borate type and its concentration in a flux melt. Small crystals of co-existing phases that appeared at high temperatures become the nucleation centers of spontaneous LnMgB5O10 crystals upon cooling. As a result of the incongruent dissolution of LnMg-borate, the melt is enriched in B2O3 and Ln2O3. Rare-earth metal oxides, in turn, cause the formation of LnBO3 with calcite- or vaterite-type structures depending on the temperature [14]. The temperature range for LnMB synthesis is restricted by the properties of K2Mo3O10-based high-temperature solutions and by borate stability in such a melt. Usually, the melting temperature of the charge does not exceed 1050 °C because of the significant increase in the borate decomposition rate. The lower temperature boundary (commonly ~800 °C) is determined by a significant increase in melt viscosity with a corresponding decrease in the crystal growth rate.
The morphological feature and elemental analysis were performed by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique using a JSM-IT500 microscope, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, equipped with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector X-Max-50, Oxford Instruments Ltd. (Abingdon, UK), GB (Laboratory of Analytical Techniques of High Spatial Resolution, Dept. of Petrology, Moscow State University).
Single-crystal X-ray studies were carried out using an Xcalibur diffractometer equipped with a CCD-detector (MoKα radiation). The XRD data were integrated using the CrysAlisPro 1.171.41.119a program software [15]. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) studies were carried out on a Rigaku MiniFlex-600 powder diffractometer (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan). PXRD datasets were collected in continuous mode at room temperature (CuKα radiation) in the range of 2θ = 3–90°, and a scan speed of 4° per minute.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed by means of a STA 449 F5 Jupiter (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) in the temperature range of 50–1200 °C with a heating rate of 20 °C/min in Ar gas flow. A PtRh20 crucible of 85 μL volume was used in the DSC experiments.
The band structure for TmMB was calculated within the framework of density functional theory using the pseudopotential plane wave basis of the Quantum Espresso v. 7.1 software package [16]. The electronic exchange correlations were treated by the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) approach under a generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [17]. Ultrasoft pseudopotentials were used to describe the interaction between electrons and ions [18]. The kinetic energy cut-off values of the wavefunctions were limited to 58 Ry. The integration calculation of the system in the Brillouin region uses the Monkhorst–Pack scheme, the k grid point is 3 × 3 × 3, and the cut-off energy of the plane wave of the system is set to 750 eV to ensure the convergence of energy and the configuration of the system at the level of quasi-complete plane wave base. In the self-consistent field operation, the Pulay density mixing method is adopted, and the self-consistent field is set to 1 × 10−6 eV/atom. The calculations did not include spin–orbit coupling. Full relativistic effects were taken for the nucleus states, and the scalar relativistic approximation was used for the valence states.
A Cary Eclipse (Agilent Technologies) fluorescence spectrometer equipped with a 75 kW xenon light source (pulse length τ = 2 μs, pulse frequency ν = 80 Hz, wavelength resolution 0.5 nm; PMT Hamamatsu R928) was used to record photoluminescence emission (PL) and excitation (PLE) spectra. All measurements were performed at room temperature and corrected for the sensitivity of the spectrometer. The quantum yield defined as the ratio of the number of emitted photons to the number of photons absorbed (QY, %) for the visible region was measured on an Edinburgh Instruments FS5 spectrofluorometer equipped with a SC-30 integrating sphere module and a Hamamatsu PMT R928P. The measurement was performed at room temperature.
Luminescence emission spectra under heating upon 500 K with the excitation in the UV region were measured using a 150 W xenon lamp (Oriel Instruments, Stratford, ON, USA) as an excitation source, an MDR-206 primary monochromator (Lomo, Saint Petersburg, Russia), and a LOT-Oriel MS-257 spectrograph (Oriel Instruments, Stratford, ON, USA) equipped with a Marconi CCD detector (Marconi Applied Technologies Limited, Chelmsford, UK). Samples were mounted into a Cryotrade LN-120 vacuum optical cryostat (Cryotrade Engineering, Moscow, Russia).

3. Results and Discussion

Spontaneous isometric crystals up to 1 mm in size were obtained from a K2Mo3O10-based flux melt (Figure 1). Preliminary XRD studies were performed to find the sample with the best diffraction reflection profile for a single-crystal X-ray study. Based on these pre-experiments, all tested specimens were crystal clusters or twin crystals.
Qualitative energy-dispersive X-ray analysis showed peaks corresponding to thulium, magnesium, boron, and oxygen (Figure 2).
The diffraction patterns of TmMgB5O10 were analyzed using the CrysAlisPro software v. 1.171.41.119a [15]. As a result, reflexes corresponding to two components with close unit cell parameters a1 = 8.476(1) Å, b1 = 7.577(1) Å, c1 = 9.368(1) Å, a2 = 8.474(2) Å, b2 = 7.572(2) Å, and c2 = 9.361(2) Å were revealed. No rigid regularities of the mutual orientation of the bases of these components, associated with a significant change in the size of the unit cell or sp. gr. (superstructure), were found (Figure 3).
The relationship between the components can be represented by the following vector equations:
a = (−0.711 × a′ − 0.29 × b′ + 0.547 × c′);
b = (0.578 × a′ + 0.136 × b′ + 0.644 × c′);
c = (−0.258 × a′ − 1.199 × b′ − 0.01 × c′).
The ratio of the two twin components is 75.1% and 23.0% of all registered reflections, respectively. The existence of two components for the TmMB single crystal slightly reduces the quality of the obtained structural model and leads to overestimated structure refinement factors. The model proposed is obtained from the experimental data of the first component (75.1% of the total number of reflections). It is not possible to correctly solve and refine the crystal structure of the second component due to the extremely high value of the parameter Rint2 = 79%.
The crystal structure model was determined and refined using the Jana2020 software package [19]. Structural patterns similar to those described in the literature [20,21] were obtained using the SuperFlip utility [22] within the sp. gr. P21/n. The experimental and crystallographic data and structural refinements of TmMB are summarized in Table 1.
The model of the structure consists of 17 independent atomic positions: one thulium position (Tm1), one magnesium position (Mg1), five boron atom positions (B1–B5), and ten oxygen positions (O1–O10). The low quality of the crystal and, as a result, of the diffraction experiment does not allow one to refine the parameters of anisotropic atomic displacements, which affects the value of the structure refinement factors and the values of the residual electron density. The atomic displacement parameters were refined isotropically for all localized positions; the occupancy of all positions is 100% (Table 2). The principle interatomic distances are listed in Table 3.
The thulium cations are coordinated by ten O atoms, forming distorted polyhedra that share a common edge and form one-dimensional zigzag chains extending along the b axis (Figure 4a). Magnesium atoms are located inside oxygen octahedra that form edge-sharing dimeric Mg2O10 groups. The adjacent Tm-O chains are linked together by dimeric Mg2O10, building Tm-Mg-O layers (Figure 4b). Boron atoms have a mixed coordination (3t + 2∆): Three B atoms are located inside oxygen tetrahedra and the other two B atoms are coordinated by three O atoms, forming a planar triangle. BO4 tetrahedra and BO3 triangles connected by corners form a pentaborate cluster [1]. Each B5O12 unit via a corner-sharing O atom between two neighboring clusters forms 4-membered rings, from which infinite two-dimensional B-O layers are further assembled (Figure 4c). Countless boron–oxygen layers are linked together by Tm and Mg cations forming a rigid three-dimensional framework (Figure 4d).
To determine the behavior and melting temperature of TmMg-borate, DSC measurements were performed. The calorimetric data in the temperature range of 50–1200 °C are shown in Figure 5. The DSC heating curve for the sample features one sharp endothermic peak with an onset temperature of ~1020 °C, but no exothermal peak was observed on the cooling curve. After melting, the residue was characterized by PXRD analysis, which showed that it was different from the initial compound powder, and the decomposition products of TmMB compound are a mixture of TmBO3 and Mg2B2O5. These results agreed with those previously obtained for Yb:YMgB5O10 crystals [24].
The PXRD dataset was collected to confirm that the crystal structure is representative of the entire experimental sample. The pattern fits well with that calculated from the cif file obtained from the structural studies and calculated from the cif file of YMaB5O10 (ICSD #4489) (Figure 6).
The band structure of the TmMB material was calculated to find out the electronic characteristics of the TmMgB5O10 model structure (Figure 7). The outcome of this analysis shows that TmMB is an insulator, as evidenced by the determination of an indirect energy gap of about 6.37 eV. This gap was determined by the A point at the maximum of the valence bands (VBM) and the Γ point at the minimum of the conduction band (CBM). However, it should be noted that GGA calculations have been shown to underestimate band gaps, and therefore, the experimental band gap for MgTmB5O10 may differ slightly from the calculated value. Notably, the VBM is a flat band, and the maximum values at Γ and A points in the Brillouin zone are quite close. This suggests that even a small concentration of defects in the simulated crystal structure could result in a direct band gap at the Γ point.
According to the calculated density of states (DOS) of MgTmB5O10 (Figure 8), the electronic structure in the energy range from −28.0 to 22 eV mainly comprises the Tm-s and O-s/p states with smaller contributions from the B-s/p and Mg-s/d/p states. The significant contribution to the lower conduction band comes from the Tm-d state, while O-s in the upper VB has a considerable effect on the dispersion.
The normalized photoluminescence excitation and photoluminescence emission spectra of the TmMgB5O10 compound are shown in Figure 9. On the PLE spectrum (Figure 9a) for TmMgB5O10 the typical transition of the Tm3+ ion is observed in the near-ultraviolet region. The sharp line with maxima centered at 358 nm corresponds to the transition 3H61D2 [25]. Since the indirect energy gap is about 6.37 eV, excitation with such higher transition energies is not possible in the 220–340 nm range. The standard sharp lines for Tm3+ were registered for the PL spectrum (Figure 9b). The maxima centered at 455, 479, 667, and 753 nm correspond to the 1D23F4, 1G43H6, 1G43F4, and 3H43H6 transitions according to [26]. The most intensive transition is observed for 1D23F4, which emits in the blue region. So, MgTmB5O10 demonstrates photoluminescence in the blue spectral region. Additionally, the integral intensity is significantly low and takes a few arb. units. Such behavior can be explained by the presence of a high concentration quenching effect in observed TmMgB5O10, which was registered in other hosts (see, for example, Refs. [27,28]. This is confirmed by the minor value of QY of approximately 3%. Such extremely low QY can indicate concentration quenching through all the resonance channels of cross-relaxation “upward” and “downward” [29] in a studied host. The calculated Tm–Tm distance in the structure (approximate value is 3.94 Å) leads to registered concentration quenching. However, in spite of DFT calculations of the MgTmB5O10 band structure for an ideal crystal model showing that this material is an insulator, contrasting these results with the experimental observations revealed the presence of PL peaks in the blue spectral range. Hence, it can be inferred that the presence of point defects in the crystal structure gives rise to additional electronic states. A similar conclusion was observed in [20], where the properties of the MgYB5O10 compound were investigated. Furthermore, observed crystals exhibit thermal stability of photoluminescence (Figure 10). As the temperature increases, the total integral intensity of the 1D23F4 transition decreases slowly, indicating the standard thermal quenching of photoluminescence for MgTmB5O10. The thermal stability of photoluminescence in this Tm3+-activated host is higher than in other hosts, for example, in crystals BaY2F8 [30] and powder YNbO4 [31]. It should be noted that other transitions in temperature dependence were not detected because of their low intensity.

4. Conclusions

Spontaneous crystals of TmMgB5O10 were synthesized by a two-step technique, where polycrystalline TmMB solids, previously obtained by solid-phase synthesis, were used as a crystal-forming agent for flux growth from a K2Mo3O10-based system. The obtained solids crystallize in the sp. gr. P21/n with unit cells parameters a = 8.476(1) Å, b = 7.577(1) Å, c = 9.368(1) Å, β = 94.035(3)°, V = 600.1(1) Å3, and z = 4. The electronic structure of TmMgB5O10 was calculated. A comprehensive study of TmMg-borate crystals was performed using scanning electron microscopy, the DSC technique, and luminescence spectroscopy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.V.; validation, E.A.V., V.V.M., A.M.A., D.V.D., I.V.N., D.A.S., E.I.M., D.D.M., V.L.K., V.O.Y., D.A.N. and E.V.K.; investigation, E.A.V., V.V.M., A.M.A., D.V.D., I.V.N., D.A.S., E.I.M., D.D.M., V.L.K., V.O.Y., D.A.N. and E.V.K.; resources, E.A.V., V.V.M., D.V.D., D.A.S., V.L.K. and V.O.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.V., A.M.A., D.V.D., I.V.N. and E.I.M.; writing—review and editing, E.A.V. and A.M.A.; visualization, E.A.V.; supervision, E.A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. CCDC reference 2286790.

Acknowledgments

X-ray diffraction data were obtained using the equipment of the Shared Research Centre FSRC «Crystallography and Photonics» RAS within the State assignment FSRC «Crystallography and Photonics» RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leonyuk, N.I.; Maltsev, V.V.; Volkova, E.A. Crystal chemistry of high-temperature borates. Molecules 2020, 25, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hölsä, J.; Leskelä, M. Fluorescence spectrum, energy level scheme and crystal field analysis of europium(+III) doped lanthanum magnesium borate LaMgB5O10:Eu3+. Mol. Phys. 1985, 54, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mitina, D.D.; Maltsev, V.V.; Deineko, D.V.; Volkova, E.A.; Koporulina, E.V.; Kuzmin, N.N.; Kosorukov, V.L.; Jiliaeva, A.I. Luminescent properties of lanthanum-magnesium pentaborate crystals doped by Tb3+ and Eu3+ ions. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023, 9, 117821. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saubat, B.; Vlasse, M.; Fouassier, C. Synthesis and structural study of the new rare earth magnesium borates LnMgB5O10 (Ln = La, …, Er). J. Solid State Chem. 1980, 34, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fouassier, C.; Saubat, B.; Hagenmuller, P. Self-quenching of Eu3+ and Tb3+ luminescencein LaMgB5O10: A host structure allowing essentially one-dimensional interactions. J. Lumin. 1981, 23, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saubat, B.; Fouassier, C.; Hagenmuller, P. Luminescent efficiency of Eu3+ and Tb3+ in LaMgB5O10—Type borates under excitation from 100 to 400 nm. Mater. Res. Bull. 1981, 16, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Knitel, M.J.; Dorenbos, P.; van Eijk, C.W.E.; Plasteig, B.; Viana, B.; Kahn-Harari, A.; Vivien, D. Photoluminescence, and scintillation/thermoluminescence yields of several Ce3+ and Eu2+ activated borates. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2000, 443, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, C.K.; Yu, M.; Pang, M.L.; Lin, J. Photoluminescent properties of sol–gel derived (La,Gd)MgB5O10:Ce3+/Tb3+ nanocrystalline thin films. Opt. Mater. 2006, 28, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El Jouhari, N.; Parent, C.; Le Flem, G. Photoluminescence of Ce3+, Tb3+, and Mn2+ in Glasses of Base Composition LaMgB5O10. J. Solid State Chem. 1996, 123, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Sun, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, G. Growth, thermal, spectral and laser properties of Nd:LaMgB5O10 crystal—A new promising laser material. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 646, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, S.; Wei, Q.; Li, B.; Shi, X.; Yuan, F.; Lou, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z.; Zhong, D.; Huang, Y.; et al. The YMgB5O10 crystal preparation and attractive multi-wavelength emission characteristics of doping Nd3+ ions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, Y.; Lou, F.; Sun, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z.; You, Z. Spectroscopy and laser performance of Yb3+:GdMgB5O10 crystal. J. Lumin. 2017, 188, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maltsev, V.V.; Mitina, D.D.; Belokoneva, E.L.; Volkova, E.A.; Koporulina, E.V.; Jiliaeva, A.I. Synthesis and flux-growth of rare-earth magnesium pentaborate crystals RMgB5O10 (R = Y, Gd, La, Tm and Yb). J. Cryst. Growth 2022, 587, 126628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leonyuk, N.I.; Leonyuk, L.I. Growth and characterization of RM3(BO3)4 crystals. Progr. Cryst. Growth Charact. 1995, 31, 179–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction. CrysAlis Pro Software System; Version 1.171.64.119a; Rigaku Corporation: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G.L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 395502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, J.S.; Qteish, A.; Payne, M.C.; Heine, V. Optimized and transferable nonlocal separableab initiopseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 4174–4180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petricek, V.; Dusek, M.; Palatinus, L. Crystallographic Computing System JANA2006: General features. Z. Kristallogr. 2014, 229, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Tao, X.; Cai, G.; Jin, Z. Phase relation, structure, and properties of borate MgYB5O10 in MgO–Y2O3–B2O3 system. Powder Diffr. 2017, 32, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Sun, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, W.; Wang, G.; Lin, Z. Growth, structure, spectral and laser properties of Yb3+:LaMgB5O10– a new laser material. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 7392–7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Palatinus, L. Ab initio determination of incommensurately modulated structures by charge-flipping in super space. Acta Cryst. A 2004, 60, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gorbachenya, K.N.; Yasukevich, A.S.; Lazarchuk, A.I.; Kisel, V.E.; Kuleshov, N.V.; Volkova, E.A.; Maltsev, V.V.; Koporulina, E.V.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Kuzmin, N.N.; et al. Growth and Spectroscopy of Yb:YMgB5O10 Crystal. Crystals 2022, 12, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, L.; Chen, G.; Yang, T.; Yuan, C.; Zhou, C. Energy transfer, optical and luminescent properties in Tm3+/Tb3+/Sm3+ tri-doped borate glasses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 28, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuwik, M.; Kowalska, K.; Pisarska, J.; Pisarski, W.A. Spectroscopic Properties of Pr3+, Tm3+, and Ho3+ in Germanate-Based Glass Systems Modified by TiO2. Materials 2023, 16, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borrego-Pérez, J.A.; González, F.; Meza-Avendaño, C.A.; De Los Santos, I.M.; López-Juárez, R.; Hernández, I.; Alonso-Guzman, E.M.; Martinez-Molina, W.; Chavez-Garcia, H.L. Structural, optical and photoluminescence properties of TiO2 and TiO2: Tm3+ nanopowders. Optik 2021, 227, 166083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guerbous, L.; Derbal, M.; Chaminade, J.P. Photoluminescence and energy transfer of Tm3+ doped LiIn (WO4)2 blue phosphors. J. Lumin. 2010, 130, 2469–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kozhan, T.M.; Kuznetsova, V.V.; Pershukevich, P.P.; Sergeev, I.I.; Khomenko, V.S.; Chernyavskii, V.A. Concentration dependence of the quantum yield of luminescence of Tm3+ ions in gadolinium oxychloride. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2004, 71, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Makhov, V.N.; Uvarova, T.V.; Kirm, M.; Vielhauer, S. Thermal quenching of luminescence of BaY2F8 crystals activated with Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 2016, 43, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Xu, S.; Yu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; Cheng, L.; Sun, J.; Chen, B. Temperature-dependent luminescence properties of Dy3+, Tm3+ single-/co-doped YNbO4 phosphors. Optik 2021, 238, 166524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TmMgB5O10 spontaneous crystals grown from a K2Mo3O10-based system.
Figure 1. TmMgB5O10 spontaneous crystals grown from a K2Mo3O10-based system.
Materials 16 06084 g001
Figure 2. Energy-dispersive X-ray qualitative analysis of TmMg-borate crystal.
Figure 2. Energy-dispersive X-ray qualitative analysis of TmMg-borate crystal.
Materials 16 06084 g002
Figure 3. Mutual orientation of two monoclinic components of Tm in reciprocal space.
Figure 3. Mutual orientation of two monoclinic components of Tm in reciprocal space.
Materials 16 06084 g003
Figure 4. Structure of TmMgB5O10: (a) zigzag chains of edge-sharing TmO10 distorted polyhedral extending along the b axis; (b) Tm-Mg-O layers, formed by linked Tm-O chains and dimeric Mg2O10 clusters, projection along the b axis; (c) 4-membered ring assembled from B5O12 neighboring clusters; (d) two-dimensional B-O layers, linked together by Tm and Mg cations, projection along b axis. The blue, orange, green, and red balls represent Tm, Mg, B, and O, respectively. Visualization by VESTA [23].
Figure 4. Structure of TmMgB5O10: (a) zigzag chains of edge-sharing TmO10 distorted polyhedral extending along the b axis; (b) Tm-Mg-O layers, formed by linked Tm-O chains and dimeric Mg2O10 clusters, projection along the b axis; (c) 4-membered ring assembled from B5O12 neighboring clusters; (d) two-dimensional B-O layers, linked together by Tm and Mg cations, projection along b axis. The blue, orange, green, and red balls represent Tm, Mg, B, and O, respectively. Visualization by VESTA [23].
Materials 16 06084 g004
Figure 5. DSC curve of TmMgB5O10 compound in the temperature range of 50–1200 °C.
Figure 5. DSC curve of TmMgB5O10 compound in the temperature range of 50–1200 °C.
Materials 16 06084 g005
Figure 6. PXRD patterns (a) of TmMgB5O10 solids, (b) calculated from the cif file obtained from the structural studies of a single crystal, and (c) calculated from the cif file of YMgB5O10 (ICSD #4489).
Figure 6. PXRD patterns (a) of TmMgB5O10 solids, (b) calculated from the cif file obtained from the structural studies of a single crystal, and (c) calculated from the cif file of YMgB5O10 (ICSD #4489).
Materials 16 06084 g006
Figure 7. The calculated band structure of MgTmB5O10.
Figure 7. The calculated band structure of MgTmB5O10.
Materials 16 06084 g007
Figure 8. The calculated density of states of MgTmB5O10.
Figure 8. The calculated density of states of MgTmB5O10.
Materials 16 06084 g008
Figure 9. (a) PLE (λem = 455 nm) and (b) PL (λem = 358 nm) spectra for MgTmB5O10.
Figure 9. (a) PLE (λem = 455 nm) and (b) PL (λem = 358 nm) spectra for MgTmB5O10.
Materials 16 06084 g009
Figure 10. The temperature dependence of Tm3+ photoluminescence (λem = 358 nm); the right figure shows the relative emission intensity as a function of temperature.
Figure 10. The temperature dependence of Tm3+ photoluminescence (λem = 358 nm); the right figure shows the relative emission intensity as a function of temperature.
Materials 16 06084 g010
Table 1. Crystallographic data, details relating to X-ray data collection, and structure refinements of TmMgB5O10.
Table 1. Crystallographic data, details relating to X-ray data collection, and structure refinements of TmMgB5O10.
Chemical FormulaTmMgB5O10
sp. gr., ZP21/n, 4
a, b, c, Å8.476(1)
7.577(1)
9.368(1)
β, °94.035(3)
V, Å600.1(1)
D, g/cm34.508
Radiation; λ, ÅMoKα; 0.71069
μ, mm−114.946
T, K295
DiffractometerXcalibur
Scan typeω
Absorption coefficient; Tmin/TmaxBy cut;
0.125/1.000
θmax, °30.61
Limitation of h, k, l–11 ≤ h ≤ 12;
–10 ≤ k ≤ 10;
–12 ≤ l ≤ 13
The number of reflections:
measured/independent (N1)/I > 3σ(I) (N2)
8445/1601/1303
Rint, %19.2
The method of refinementOLS by F2
The number of refined parameters71
Consideration of extinction, kType 2
R1/Rw2 on N10.0543/0.1045
R1/Rw2 on N20.0638/0.1056
S2.42
Δρmin/Δρmax–5.54/5.50
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic thermal parameters Ueq in the TmMgB5O10 structure.
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic thermal parameters Ueq in the TmMgB5O10 structure.
Atomx/ay/bz/cUeq, Å2
Tm10.3152(1) 0.6865(1)0.2582(1)0.0065(1)
Mg10.596(1)0.406(1)0.130(1)0.005(1)
B10.335(1)0.898(1)0.491(1)0.006(1)
B20.436(1)0.186(1)−0.089(1)0.006(1)
B3−0.084(1)0.573(1)0.254(1)0.008(1)
B40.517(1)0.676(1)0.602(1)0.003(1)
B50.224(1)−0.034(1)−0.056(1)0.006(1)
O10.250(1)0.945(1)0.370(1)0.006(1)
O20.320(1)0.124(1)−0.011(1)0.007(1)
O30.812(1)0.532(1)0.121(1)0.006(1)
O40.682(1)0.150(1)0.140(1)0.006(1)
O50.451(1)0.770(1)0.475(1)0.007(1)
O60.508(1)0.350(1)−0.073(1)0.006(1)
O70.490(1)0.093(1)−0.201(1)0.008(1)
O80.583(1)0.472(1)0.351(1)0.007(1)
O90.038(1)0.705(1)0.228(1)0.002(1)
O100.677(1)0.611(1)0.580(1)0.007(1)
Table 3. The main interatomic distances (Å) in the TmMgB5O10 structures.
Table 3. The main interatomic distances (Å) in the TmMgB5O10 structures.
AtomsDistance, ÅAtomsDistance, Å
Tm1–O12.304(7)B2–O21.347(13)
Tm1–O12.236(7)B2–O61.387(12)
Tm1–O22.747(7)B2–O71.363(13)
Tm1–O52.354(7)<B2–O>1.365
Tm1–O62.389(7)B3–O31.512(12)
Tm1–O72.441(7)B3–O41.456(13)
Tm1–O82.875(6)B3–O71.452(13)
Tm1–O92.355(6)B3–O91.467(12)
Tm1–O102.713(7)<B3–O>1.472
Tm1–O102.497(1)B4–O51.462(12)
<Tm1–O>2.4911B4–O81.492(12)
Mg1–O32.067(7)B4–O91.485(12)
Mg1–O42.071(8)B4–O101.472(12)
Mg1–O62.040(7)<B4–O>1.478
Mg1–O62.104(7)B5–O21.490(12)
Mg1–O82.137(7)B5–O41.455(13
Mg1–O92.371(7)B5–O81.504(11)
<Mg1–O>2.131B5–O101.483(13)
B1–O11.347(12)<B5–O>1.483
B1–O31.353(13)
B1–O51.398(12)
<B1–O>1.366
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Volkova, E.A.; Maltsev, V.V.; Antipin, A.M.; Deyneko, D.V.; Nikiforov, I.V.; Spassky, D.A.; Marchenko, E.I.; Mitina, D.D.; Kosorukov, V.L.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; et al. The Synthesis, Structure, and Luminescent Properties of TmMgB5O10 Crystals. Materials 2023, 16, 6084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186084

AMA Style

Volkova EA, Maltsev VV, Antipin AM, Deyneko DV, Nikiforov IV, Spassky DA, Marchenko EI, Mitina DD, Kosorukov VL, Yapaskurt VO, et al. The Synthesis, Structure, and Luminescent Properties of TmMgB5O10 Crystals. Materials. 2023; 16(18):6084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Volkova, Elena A., Victor V. Maltsev, Alexander M. Antipin, Dina V. Deyneko, Ivan V. Nikiforov, Dmitry A. Spassky, Ekaterina I. Marchenko, Diana D. Mitina, Vladimir L. Kosorukov, Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt, and et al. 2023. "The Synthesis, Structure, and Luminescent Properties of TmMgB5O10 Crystals" Materials 16, no. 18: 6084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186084

APA Style

Volkova, E. A., Maltsev, V. V., Antipin, A. M., Deyneko, D. V., Nikiforov, I. V., Spassky, D. A., Marchenko, E. I., Mitina, D. D., Kosorukov, V. L., Yapaskurt, V. O., Naprasnikov, D. A., & Koporulina, E. V. (2023). The Synthesis, Structure, and Luminescent Properties of TmMgB5O10 Crystals. Materials, 16(18), 6084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop