Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Setting Times of Concrete Using Electro-Mechanical Impedance Sensing Technique
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Oxygen Content in the Protective Gas on Pitting Corrosion Resistance of a 316L Stainless Steel Weld Joint
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: “Computational Mechanics of Structures and Materials”
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 16
10.3390/ma16165615
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete with Secondary Aluminum Ash Exposed to NaCl Action

by
Hong Jiang
1,
Kewei Wang
2 and
Hui Wang
2,*
1
School of Municipal and Transportation Engineering, Anhui Water Conservancy Technical College, Hefei 231603, China
2
School of Civil Engineering and Geographic Environment, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(16), 5615; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165615
Submission received: 17 July 2023 / Revised: 10 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 August 2023 / Published: 14 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Corrosion Resistance of Metal Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Secondary aluminum ash (SAA) is a type of common solid waste which leads to pollution without treatment. Due to its chemical reactivity, the application of SAA to reactive powder concrete (RPC) may help solidify this solid waste while increasing its performance. However, RPC is usually in active service when used with steel bars. NaCl can corrode the steel bars when reinforced RPC is used in a coastal environment. In this study, the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC was investigated. The specimens were exposed to an environment of NaCl with freeze–thaw cycles (F-Cs) and dry–wet alternations (D-As). The corresponding mass loss rates (MRs), the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) curves and the dynamic modulus of elasticity (DME) were measured. The results show that the MR and the DME of reinforced RPC decrease with increasing values of F-C and D-A. F-C and D-A increases lead to increased electrical resistance (R). The real part value corresponding to the extreme point of the EIS curve is increased by 0~213.7% when the SAA is added. The relationship between the imaginary part and the real part of the EIS fits the quadratic function. The equivalent circuit of the reinforced RPC is obtained from the EIS curves. The R of the rust is calculated by using the equivalent circuit. The rust’s R decreases in the quadratic function with the mass ratio of the SAA. After 200 NaCl F-Cs, the MR, the DME and the R vary within the ranges of 23.4~113.6%, −2.93~−4.76% and 4.92~13.55%. When 20 NaCl D-As are finished, the MR, the DME and the R vary within the ranges of 34.7~202.8%, −13.21~−14.93% and 120.48~486.39%. The corrosion area rates are 2.3~68.7% and 28.7~125.6% higher after exposure to 200 NaCl F-Cs and 20 NaCl D-As. When the SAA is mixed, the MR is decreased by 0~13.12%, the DME increases by 0~3.11%, the R of the reinforced RPC increases by 26.01~152.43% and the corrosion area rates are decreased by 21.39~58.62%. This study will provide a novel method for solidifying SAA while improving the chlorine salt resistance of RPC.

1. Introduction

Secondary aluminum ash (SAA) is a solid waste which can induce relatively serious environmental pollution [1,2]. The main method used for the disposal of aluminum ash is the magnetic separation method, which can separate parts containing high-iron minerals from primary aluminum ash [3,4]. The disposed aluminum ash can be further recovered and utilized [5,6]. Moreover, plasma technology has been applied in treating aluminum ash. The magnetic separation method shows the advantage of extracting highly pure aluminum, but due to the need to wash the aluminum ash before magnetic separation treatment, a large amount of water will be consumed during the washing process, resulting in a significant waste of water resources and a long washing time, which is not conducive to industrialization [7,8]. The acid leaching method has been applied in the processing of SAA. Furthermore, fused salt electrolysis can be used for the disposal of SAA. However, the acid leaching method and fused salt electrolysis present longer times and higher costs [9,10]. Although many methods can be used to extract metal aluminum, the cost of processing is high, and many oxides have not been used in a timely manner. Hence, the resource utilization of SAA is very important.
SAA shows high chemical reactivity, which is advantageous for the performance of cement matrices [11,12]. Several studies have investigated the use of SAA in cement materials [13,14]. The reactive oxygen species can promote cement hydration, thereby enhancing the hydration degree of cement and the mechanical strength of cement concrete. Several studies on the influence of SAA on improving mechanical strength have been reported [15]. Although SAA is beneficial for concrete’s mechanical properties, the influence of SAA on the durability of cement concrete has attracted little attention from researchers.
Reactive powder concrete (RPC) is manufactured using a large number of mineral admixtures, quartz sand and other materials and is made according to the maximum density theory [16,17,18,19]. The influence of waste fly ash, furnace ash and rice husk ash on mechanical strength and resistance to chloride erosion have been investigated by prior researchers. The addition of waste fly ash, furnace ash and rice husk ash can increase flexural strength with maximum increasing rates of compressive strength of 36.1%, 27.4 and 31.2%, while the corresponding increasing rates are 23.4%, 18.6% and 24.3%. Meanwhile, the corresponding mass loss rates are 21.2%, 18.6% and 11.3% after 200 NaCl freeze–thaw cycles [20,21,22].
The application of SAA in RPC can help solidify this solid waste while increasing its performance [23]. However, RPC is usually used in actual engineering environments after the placement of steel bars. Steel bars are corroded by NaCl action when reinforced RPC is used in a coastal environment [24]. Previous studies have pointed out that solid waste possessing high active substances can improve the compactness of RPC, thus improving the corresponding mechanical strength and the corrosion resistance [25,26]. When reinforced RPC is used in marine environments, the steel bars’ inner RPC is easily corroded by chloride ions in seawater [27]. The addition of SAA may have complex impacts on the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC. However, little attention has been paid to this research direction.
In this study, the effect of SAA on the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC is investigated. The specimens are exposed to a NaCl corrosion environment. The mass loss rates (MRs), AC electrical resistance (R), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) curves and dynamic modulus of elasticity (DME) of reinforced RPC are determined for the characterization of corrosion resistance. This study will provide a reference for the use of reinforced RPC with secondary aluminum ash in marine environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

For clarity, the abbreviations of all nouns in the text are presented in Table 1. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) provided by Guizhou Kunhao Yongsheng Trading Co., Ltd., Guiyang, China, was used for manufacturing the RPC. The OPC showed initial and final setting times of 121.4 min and 354.3 min.
Fly ash (FA) with a purity higher than 99% was provided by Emeishan Taixin Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Leshan City, China. The FA had high corrosion resistance, showing a density of 1.5 g/cm3 and a particle size of 0.05–0.20 μm. Secondary aluminum ash (SAA) with Al2O3 content ranging from 20% to 60% and SiO2 content below 8% was purchased from Anyang County Jiacheng Yenai Co., Ltd., Anyang, China. Quartz sand produced by Changxing Qingsheng Calcium Industry Co., Ltd., Changzhou, showed a SiO2 content of 99.7% and apparent density of 2.66 g/cm3. Level S95 blast furnace slag powder (BFS) with a density of 2.88 g/cm3, activity index above 95%, a specific surface area of 437.1 m2/g and a loss on ignition of 2.21%, manufactured by Hebei Chuangtian Engineering Materials Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China, was used as another mineral admixture. Three scales of quartz sand with particle sizes of 3.96~1.39 mm, 0.83~0.42 mm and 0.35~0.17 mm and with mass ratios of 1:1.5:1 were used as the aggregate. Liquid polycarboxylate water reducer with a solid content of 23.6% was provided by Anhui Huashi Nanotechnology Co., Ltd., Hefei, China, showing a water-reducing rate of 40.1%. The particle size and compositions of the cementitious materials are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The flowability of fresh RPC was adjusted by polycarboxylate superplasticizer, whose water-reducing rate was 37.8%.

2.2. The Manufacturing Process of Specimens

A UJZ-15 mixer was used for stirring the RPC. The dry materials were added to the mixer and stirred with a mixing speed of 60 ± 2 r/min for 2 min, and then water mixed with a water-reducing agent was added to the mixer. A mixing speed of 80 ± 2 r/min was used for manufacturing the RPC. Specimens with a size of 50 × 50 × 50 mm3 were used for the measurement of corrosion resistance. Steel bars and stainless steel wire mesh were used as the two electrodes of the specimen. The stainless steel wire mesh was vertically inserted into the back of the specimen and 5 mm away from the edge. The steel bars were vertically inserted into the center of the specimen, and the center of the steel bars was 25 mm away from the boundary of the specimen. The specimens were cured in the standard curing environment of 20.3 °C and relative humidity of 96.2%. Figure 1 shows the manufacturing process of the RPC samples. Meanwhile, the mixing proportions of SAA-RPC are shown in Table 3. Six specimens were used in each experiment.

2.3. NaCl Action on RPC

The specimens were immersed in a NaCl solution with 3% mass fraction for 4 days after 24 days’ standard curing. After this, the specimens were moved to the rapid freeze–thaw machine provided by Tianjin Gangyuan Test Instrument Factory, Tianjin, China, for the rapid freeze–thaw (F-C) test. A temperature range of −15 °C~ 8 °C was used for the experiment. The specimens were placed in plastic sleeves, which were filled with 3% NaCl solution. During the F-C test, the specimens underwent a total of 200 cycles, and specimens were taken out every 50 cycles to measure the MR, DME and R. Each F-C lasted for 3 h (2 h freezing and 1 h thawing). A dry–wet cyclic salt spray tester from Jiangsu Jiuyi Power Equipment Co., Ltd., Yangzhou, China, was used in the measurement of NaCl dry–wet (D-A) alternations. The MR, DME and R of specimens were measured after every 5 alternations. Each D-A cycle consisted of three steps totaling 48 h. The specimens with no excess water on the surface were dried at 80 °C for 36 h, and then the dried specimens were cooled for 2 h. Finally, the cooled specimens were immersed in NaCl solution for 10 h. After the measurements were taken, all specimens were returned. The measuring process lasted for a very short time, and the conditions for the specimens were not changed. Similar experimental methods can be found in the Chinese standard GB/T50082-2009 and Cao et al.’s studies [28,29].

2.4. The Corrosion Resistance Parameters

The initial masses of specimens were weighed using an electronic scale after being immersed in the NaCl solution for 4 days. The specimens were cleaned with water and wiped with a cloth after the NaCl D-A cycles. After NaCl exposure, the mass was weighed, and the mass loss rate (MR) was calculated using Equation (1) [29], where m1 is the initial mass of the RPC before NaCl action and mt is the mass of the RPC after a certain number of NaCl F-Cs or D-As.
M R = m 1 − m t m 1
An HC-U81 concrete ultrasonic detector (provided by Zhongjiao Jianyi Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for testing the dynamic modulus of elasticity (DME). The definition of dynamic moduli of elasticity can be found in the References and can be obtained from Equation (2) [30], where V1 is the initial ultrasonic velocity before NaCl action and Vt is the ultrasonic velocity of specimens after a certain number of NaCl F-Cs or D-As.
D M E = ( V t V 1 ) 2 × 100 %
A TH2811D LCR digital bridge was used for the measurement of the R of RPC with a testing frequency of 104 Hz and a voltage of 1 V. A Zhuodi electrochemical workstation substance qualitative and quantitative analysis instrument, purchased from Zhuodi Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, was used for the measurement of EIS with an AC voltage ranging from −10 mV to 10 mV. Steel bars and stainless steel wire mesh were used as the two electrodes of the specimen in the experiment. The voltage applied to the Tafer curves ranged from −0.15 V to 0.15 V. Due to the high resistance of the sample, the current magnitude inside the sample during testing was only within the range of 10−4~10−6 A/cm2, and the dynamic potential scanning process lasted for 5.96 s. The additional corrosion caused to the sample can be almost negligible, so it can be considered as non-destructive testing. The equipment measuring processes of the R and the EIS curves are shown in Figure 2. In this study, six specimens were selected for the corrosion resistance experiment. The average value of six specimens was considered to be the experimental result. Table 4 shows the number of specimens and the standard deviation for testing parameters. The measurement details can be found in Cao’s study [31].

3. Results and Discussion

When the steel bars of RPC corrode, the rust will increase the cracking of RPC, leading to an increase in the spalling of RPC. The increased cracks will prevent the propagation speed of electrons and sound waves, which will result in a decrease in the relative dynamic elastic modulus and an increase in electrical resistance. Therefore, the mass loss rate, the dynamic modulus of elasticity and the electrical resistance of reinforced RPC were measured to reflect the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC.

3.1. The Mass Loss Rate

The mass loss rates (MRs) of the reinforced RPC after different cycles of NaCl F-C and D-A are illustrated in Figure 3. In Figure 3, the left y-axis represents the mass loss rate, while the right y-axis represents the growth rate of the mass loss rate with the increasing cycles. The MR increases with an increasing number of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. This is ascribed to the fact that the NaCl F-C and D-A action can increase the crystallization stress of RPC by more than 200% and 300%, respectively, leading to an increase in spalling on the surface of the RPC specimens. Moreover, as the NaCl D-A cycle continues, the number of NaCl crystals in the RPC increases, which leads to the growth of the crystalline stress in the RPC and leads to the loss of the RPC specimen’s mass. In addition, the NaCl D-A cycles will lead to the enrichment of the NaCl solution in the pore solution of the RPC. After the specimen is dried, the moisture evaporates, and the crystallization of NaCl in RPC induces crystallization stress, which can cause RPC to crack and peel off, leading to a decrease in RPC mass. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 3, the addition of SAA can decrease the MR of the RPC after NaCl action. This is ascribed to the pozzolanic effect by the SAA in RPC, which can decrease the mass loss rate (MR) of RPC after NaCl F-Cs and D-As [32,33]. After 200 NaCl F-Cs and 20 NaCl D-As, the MR of RPC is decreased by 23.4~113.6% and 34.7~202.8%, respectively.

3.2. The Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Reinforced RPC

Equation (2) was applied to calculate the dynamic modulus of elasticity (DME) of the reinforced RPC in this study. The DME of reinforced RPC during NaCl F-Cs and D-As is shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4, the left y-axis represents the value of the dynamic modulus of elasticity (DME), while the right y-axis represents the loss rate of DME with the increasing cycles. The DME of RPC decreases with the increasing number of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. The frost heave stress and pore pressure caused by the NaCl F-Cs and the crystallization stress caused by the NaCl D-As can accelerate the number and expansion of cracks inside RPC, which can block the propagation of ultrasound [34,35]. Therefore, the DME decreased with an increasing number of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. After 200 NaCl F-Cs and 20 NaCl D-As, the DME was increased by adding SAA. As described in Wang’s studies, NaCl F-Cs and D-As can accelerate the number and width of cracks, which prevents the transmission of ultrasound and decreases the DME. Moreover, the chloride ions will penetrate into the RPC along the cracks to corrode the steel bars, further accelerating the expansion of the cracks and reducing the DME value. The DME is decreased with the decreasing rates of 2.93~4.76% and 13.21~14.93% after the effect of 200 NaCl F-Cs and D-As. Compared with the RPC mixed with waste fly ash, the DME of SAA-RPC was 1.3~2.6% higher after 200 NaCl F-Cs and 2.1~3.3% higher after 20 NaCl D-As [36,37,38].

3.3. The Electrical Parameters

The electrical resistance (R) of RPC during the NaCl F-Cs and D-As is shown in Figure 5. In Figure 5, the left y-axis represents the value of R, and the right y-axis represents the loss rate of R with the cycle increases. As shown in Figure 5, the R increases with the increasing numbers of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. This is ascribed to the fact that the NaCl F-Cs and D-As can accelerate the increase and expansion of internal cracks in RPC [39]. The increased inner cracks delay the propagation of electrons in the RPC. Therefore, the R is decreased by NaCl action, leading to an increase in the R of reinforced RPC [40,41]. When the dosages of SAA are increased, the initial R is increased and the increasing rates of R are decreased, indicating that the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC is improved by adding the SAA. Moreover, the RPC specimens subjected to the NaCl D-A effect showed a higher R rate than the RPC specimens subjected to the NaCl F-C effect, indicating that when the NaCl D-A effect is exerted on the reinforced RPC, the reinforcement corrodes more seriously than in the specimens subjected to NaCl F-Cs. After 200 NaCl F-Cs or 20 NaCl D-As, the AC electrical resistance increased by the rates of 4.92~13.55% and 120.48~486.39%, respectively. The AC electrical resistance was increased by 26.01~152.43% after the SAA was added.
Figure 6 shows the EIS curves of the reinforced RPC. In Figure 6, Zi represents the electrical reactance of reinforced RPC and Zr represents the corresponding electrical reactance. The relationship between Zi and Zr accords with quadratic function. The real part values corresponding to the extreme point of the EIS curves increase with the NaCl D-A and NaCl F-C effects. Moreover, the increasing amounts of SAA lead to the minimum points being increased. This is attributed to the increased F-C or D-A damage caused by NaCl D-A or NaCl F-C action [42]. Consequently, the R is increased. The R-squared values of the reinforced RPC’s EIS curves are 0.99 and 1.0, showing the reasonability of the fitting results.
The equivalent circuit of reinforced RPC is shown in Figure 7. It can be seen in Figure 7 that the equivalent circuit of reinforced RPC consists of four electrical components. R0 in the equivalent circuit represents the contact electrical resistance between the RPC matrix and the steel bar or the electrode, where Ri and Ci (i = 1, 2, 3) are the parallel resistances and capacitances of the pore solution, the rust on the surface of the steel bars and the RPC matrix. In Figure 7, R0 and the parallel resistances and capacitances of the pore solution, the rust on the surface of the steel bars and the RPC matrix are in series. The specific analysis of equivalent circuit diagrams can be found in the studies of Wang et al. [43].
The electrical resistivity of the rust is shown in Figure 8. In Figure 8, m means the ratio of SAA mass to the total mass of SAA and FA. As illustrated in Figure 8, the electrical resistivity of the rust increases with the increasing number of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. This is ascribed to the fact that the NaCl action can accelerate the steel bars’ corrosion, increasing the rust’s electrical resistivity [44]. Therefore, the NaCl action can accelerate the steel bars’ corrosion. Moreover, the increasing content of SAA can decrease the electrical resistivity of the rust, showing the fact that the SAA can improve the corrosion resistance of the reinforced RPC. Moreover, as shown in Figure 8, the rust’s electrical resistivity of the reinforced RPC after exposure to NaCl D-A action is higher than the rust’s electrical resistivity of the reinforced RPC after the NaCl F-C effect. The R-squared of the relationship between the electrical resistivity and the mass ratio of SAA is 0.99, which shows the accuracy of the fitting equations.
The Tafel curves of reinforced RPC under the NaCl F-Cs and D-As are shown in Figure 9. In Figure 9, the percentage means the proportion of the SAA mass to the total mass of SAA and FA. The voltage range applied to the electrode was −0.15 V to 0.15 V. Due to the high resistance of the specimen, the current inside the specimen during testing was very small, and the linear polarization scanning process took an extremely short time. The Tafel curves can be divided into two parts. Firstly, the electrical voltage of reinforced RPC is maintained at horizontal relationships with the logarithm of current. Then, the Tafel curves are changed into piecewise functions. As shown in Figure 9, the extreme points of the potential voltage range from −623 mV to −200 mV, and the addition of SAA can decrease the potential voltage values corresponding to the extreme points (each Tafel curve is composed of two curves; the bifurcation point of the two curves is the extreme point). Due to the fact that the addition of SAA can form calcium aluminate, which increases the compactness of the RPC hydration products, the penetration of chloride ions is prevented, leading to the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC being improved. Moreover, as shown in Figure 9, the reinforced RPC exposed to NaCl D-A action shows higher extreme point values of the potential voltage than that exposed to NaCl F-Cs.
The corrosion area rate of steel bars can be obtained by the Tafel curves as expressed in Equation (3) [45].
v = 10 m 9.65 × 10 4 3.6 N i = 3.73 × 10 − 4 m N i
where v is the corrosion rate of inner steel bars with the unit of g/m2h, m means the atomic weight of the metal with the unit of g, N represents the atomic valence of the metal and i represents the corrosion current density, whose unit is μA/cm2.
The corrosion area rate of the reinforced RPC’s inner steel bars is shown in Figure 10. As depicted in Figure 10, the corrosion area rate of the reinforced RPC’s inner steel bars increases with the increase in NaCl F-Cs and D-As. Moreover, the addition of SAA demonstrates a decreasing effect on the corrosion area rate of the reinforced RPC’s inner steel bars, thus indicating the fact that SAA can improve the corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC. Furthermore, as illustrated in Figure 10, the corrosion area rate of the reinforced RPC’s inner steel bars exposed to NaCl D-A is higher than that of specimens exposed to NaCl F-C.

4. Conclusions

The corrosion resistance of reinforced RPC with SAA was investigated in this study. The NaCl F-Cs and D-As were considered.
The mass of the reinforced RPC decreased during the NaCl F-C and D-A action. It was shown that 200 NaCl F-Cs and 20 NaCl D-As can increase the MR by 23.4~113.6% and 34.7~202.8%, respectively. Moreover, the DME was decreased by rates of 2.93~4.76% and 13.21~14.93%. The addition of SAA helped decrease the MR and increase the DME of the reinforced RPC. The MR was decreased by 0~13.12% and the DME was increased by 0~3.11% when SAA was added.
The AC electrical resistance of reinforced RPC before NaCl action was increased by adding the SAA. The NaCl F-Cs and D-As led to an increase in the electrical resistance of the reinforced RPC. After 200 NaCl F-Cs or 20 NaCl D-As, the AC electrical resistance increased by rates of 4.92~13.55% and 120.48~486.39%, respectively. The AC electrical resistance was increased by 26.01~152.43% after the SAA was added.
The AC electrical reactance varied in the quadratic function with the AC electrical resistance. The equivalent circuit of the reinforced RPC consisted of the contact electrical resistance between the electrode and the RPC matrix in series with three electrical components. The three electrical components were the parallel electrical resistance and reactance of the pore solution, the RPC matrix and the rust. The electrical resistance of the rust on the surface of steel bars was increased after exposure to NaCl action and decreased by adding the SAA.
The Tafel curves’ results show that the SAA can decrease the corrosion current, thus improving the corresponding corrosion resistance. The reinforced RPC corroded more seriously with the NaCl action. The NaCl D-As generated more severe corrosion on the reinforced RPC than the NaCl F-Cs. The addition of SAA decreased the corrosion area rates of the steel bars reinforced by RPC by 21.39~58.62%.
The coupling effect of multiple environments on the corrosion resistance of the reinforced SAA-RPC was not considered and will be studied in the future.

Author Contributions

Software, H.J. and K.W.; Validation, K.W.; Formal analysis, H.W.; Resources, H.J. and H.W.; Writing—original draft, H.J.; Writing—review & editing, H.W.; Visualization, K.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Project of Science and Technology for Public Welfare of Ningbo City (Grant no. 2023J086) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY22E080005].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

OPCOrdinary Portland cement
F-CFreeze–thaw cycle
D-ADry–wet alternation
MRMass loss rate
EISElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy
DMEDynamic modulus of elasticity
RAC electrical resistance
SAASecondary aluminum ash
BFSBlast furnace slag
FAFly ash

References

  1. Palma-Rojas, S.; Caldeira-Pires, A.; Nogueira, J.M. Environmental and economic hybrid life cycle assessment of bagasse-derived ethanol produced in Brazil. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2015, 22, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Russo, I.; Confente, I.; Scarpi, D.; Hazen, B.T. From trash to treasure: The impact of consumer perception of bio-waste products in closed-loop supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Padamata, S.K.; Andrey, Y. A Review of Secondary Aluminum Production and Its Byproducts. JOM 2021, 73, 2603–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eliche-Quesada, D.; Ruiz-Molina, S.; Pérez-Villarejo, L.; Castro, E.; Sánchez-Soto, P.J. Dust filter of secondary aluminium industry as raw material of geopolymer foams. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, M.S.; Vasumathi, M.; Begum, S.R.; Luminita, S.M.; Vlase, S.; Pruncu, C.I. Influence of B4C and industrial waste fly ash reinforcement particles on the micro structural characteristics and mechanical behavior of aluminium (Al–Mg–Si-T6) hybrid metal matrix composite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 1201–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tenorio, J.A.S.; Espinosa, D.C.R. Effect of salt/oxide interaction on the process of aluminum recycling. J. Light Metals. 2002, 2, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ünlü, N.; Drouet, M.G. Comparison of salt-free aluminum dross treatment processes. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2002, 36, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mahinroosta, M.; Allahverdi, A. A promising green process for synthesis of high purity activated-alumina nanopowder from secondary aluminum dross. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 179, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shriraksha, J.; Chandrashekar, A.R.; Sujay, R.N. Eco-concrete for sustainability: Utilizing AD and iron slag as partial replacement materials. Clean Tech. Environ. Policy 2017, 19, 2291–2304. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shen, H.L.; Liu, B.; Ekberg, C. Harmless disposal and resource utilization for secondary aluminum dross: A review. Total Environ. 2021, 760, 14368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ozerkan, N.G.; Maki, O.L.; Anayeh, M.W.; Tangen, S. The effect of aluminium dross on mechanical and corrosion properties of concrete. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 3, 9912–9922. [Google Scholar]
  12. Maria, G.; Nastasia, P.; Lidia, R.; Romanita, T.; Maria, R. Some contributions regarding technical and ecological compatibility of the secondary aluminium slags, with portland cement matrix. Rev. Rom. Mater. 2007, 37, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  13. Arimanwa, J.I.; Onwuka, D.O.; Arimanwa, M.C.; Onwuka, U.S. Prediction of the compressive strength of aluminum waste–cement concrete using Scheffe’s theory. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2012, 24, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meshram, A.; Singh, K.K. Recovery of valuable products from hazardous aluminum dross: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 130, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sunwoo, P.; Lian, M.M.; Lee, D.Y. Chemical and physical characteristics of hybrid alkaline cement composite after laser interaction. J. Build. 2023, 68, 106131. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hang, T.; Luca, S.; David, B. Development of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete recycling aluminum production waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 371, 130212. [Google Scholar]
  17. Satish Reddy, M.; Neeraja, D. Mechanical and durability aspects of concrete incorporating secondary aluminium slag. Resour. Effic. Technol. 2016, 2, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ewais, E.M.M.; Khalil, N.M.; Amin, M.S. Utilization of aluminum sludge and aluminum slag (dross) for the manufacture of calcium aluminate cement. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 3381–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kočí, V.; Vejmelková, E.; Koňáková, D.; Pommer, V.; Grzeszczyk, S.; Matuszek-Chmurowska, A.; Mordak, A.; Černý, R. Basic physical, mechanical, thermal and hygric properties of reactive powder concrete with basalt and polypropylene fibers after high-temperature exposure. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 374, 130922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, H. Influence of Mineral Powder and Fiber on Work and Mechanical Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete. Multipurp. Util. Miner. Resour. 2023, 2, 197–204. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ting, M.; Wong, K.; Rahman, M.; Joo, M.S. Mechanical and durability performance of marine sand and seawater concrete incorporating silicomanganese slag as coarse aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 254, 119195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alderete, N.; Joseph, A.; Van den Heede, P.; Matthys, S.; De Belie, N. Effective and sustainable use of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in concrete regarding strength and durability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zuo, Z.P.; Lv, H.; Li, R.B. A new approach to recover the valuable elements in black aluminum dross. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 174, 105768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, J.; Liu, S.; Song, L.; Qu, Z.; Wang, H. Influence of Carbon Dioxide Curing on the Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Cement Mortar under the External Erosion of NaCl Freeze–Thaw Cycle. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Assi, A.; Bilo, F.; Zanoletti, A.; Ponti, J.; Valsesia, A.; La Spina, R.; Zacco, A.; Bontempi, E. Zero-waste approach in municipal solid waste incineration: Reuse of bottom ash to stabilize fly ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, W.; Wang, H.; Tian, X. The Effect of Secondary Aluminum Ash on the Properties of Reactive Powder Concrete. Materials 2023, 16, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Cui, M.; Chen, G.; Han, W. Experimental study of the effects of graphene nanoplatelets on microstructure and compressive properties of concrete under chloride ion corrosion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 360, 129564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. GB/T50082-2009; Standard for Test Method of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2009.
  29. Tan, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z.; Xue, C.; He, R. Performances of Cement Mortar Incorporating Superabsorbent Polymer (SAP) Using Different Dosing Methods. Materials 2019, 12, 1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ohtsu, M. Nondestructive evaluation of damaged concrete due to freezing and thawing by elastic-wave method. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2005, 3, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cao, Z.; Wang, K.; Peng, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, R. Influence of NaCl Solution External Erosion on Corrosion Resistance of RPC Reinforced with Straw Fiber. Coatings 2023, 13, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Heidari, A.; Shourabi, F.N. Mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete based on reactive powder concrete: Effect of sand-to-cement ratio, adding glass fiber and calcium carbonate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 368, 130108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. David, O.; Opeyemi, J.; Adekunle, M.; Babatunde, F. Influence of secondary aluminum dross (SAD) on compressive strength and water absorption capacity properties of sandcrete block. Cogent. Eng. 2019, 6, 1608687. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sreekumaran, S.; Mohan, K. Low-Velocity impact resistance of reactive powder concrete modified using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 341, 127891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdulkareem, O.M.; Fraj, A.B.; Bouasker, M. Microstructural investigation of slag-blended UHPC: The effects of slag content and chemical/thermal activation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, J.; Zang, S.; Yang, F.; Zhang, M.; Li, A. Fracture Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete under Dry–Wet Cycle Sulfate Attack. Buildings 2022, 12, 1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, J.; Shu, Y.; Fang, A.; Qin, R.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J. Effect of dry-wet cycle on dynamic mechanical characteristics of EPS cement soil under different chloride salt environments. Case. Stud. Constr. Mat. 2023, 18, e02151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Yin, S.; Wang, F. Interfacial bonding performance of textile reinforced ECC and seawater sea-sand concrete under a dry-wet environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 368, 130384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Z.; Gong, R.; Zhang, H.; He, W. The Sustainability Performance of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Tunnel Lining Induced by Long-Term Coastal Environment. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, J.; Zhu, H.; Chen, L.; Qinglin, X.; Ying, G. Rebar corrosion investigation in rubberaggregate concrete via the chloride electro-accelerated test. Materials 2019, 12, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mi, T.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Dong, Z. The effect of carbonation on chloride redistribution and corrosion of steel reinforcement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 363, 129641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kępniak, M.; Woyciechowski, P.; Łukowski, P.; Kuziak, J.; Kobyłka, R. The Durability of Concrete Modified by Waste Limestone Powder in the Chemically Aggressive Environment. Materials 2019, 12, 1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Dai, J.; Yin, S.; Lin, F.; Dong, P. Study on bond performance between seawater sea-sand concrete and BFRP bars under chloride corrosion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 371, 130718. [Google Scholar]
  44. Shi, X.; Fay, L.; Peterson, M.; Yang, Z. Freeze-thaw damage and chemical change of a portland cement concrete in the presence of diluted deicers. Mater. Struct. 2010, 43, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J. Electrochemical Measurement Technology; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
Materials 16 05615 g001
Figure 1. The preparation of RPC specimens.
Figure 1. The preparation of RPC specimens.
Materials 16 05615 g001
Materials 16 05615 g002
Figure 2. The measuring process of electrical parameters. (a) The measurement of R; (b) the measurement of EIS and Tafer curves; (c) the specimens after NaCl action.
Figure 2. The measuring process of electrical parameters. (a) The measurement of R; (b) the measurement of EIS and Tafer curves; (c) the specimens after NaCl action.
Materials 16 05615 g002
Materials 16 05615 g003
Figure 3. The MR after different numbers of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. (a) After exposure to different F-Cs; (b) after exposure to different D-As.
Figure 3. The MR after different numbers of NaCl F-Cs and D-As. (a) After exposure to different F-Cs; (b) after exposure to different D-As.
Materials 16 05615 g003
Materials 16 05615 g004
Figure 4. The DME of RPC exposed to NaCl action. (a) The DME of RPC exposed to different F-Cs; (b) the DME of RPC exposed to different D-As.
Figure 4. The DME of RPC exposed to NaCl action. (a) The DME of RPC exposed to different F-Cs; (b) the DME of RPC exposed to different D-As.
Materials 16 05615 g004
Materials 16 05615 g005
Figure 5. The R of specimens after various numbers of NaCl effects. (a) After exposure to different F-Cs; (b) after exposure to different D-As.
Figure 5. The R of specimens after various numbers of NaCl effects. (a) After exposure to different F-Cs; (b) after exposure to different D-As.
Materials 16 05615 g005
Materials 16 05615 g006
Figure 6. The EIS curves of reinforced RPC. (a) Before NaCl erosion; (b) after NaCl F-C; (c) after NaCl D-A.
Figure 6. The EIS curves of reinforced RPC. (a) Before NaCl erosion; (b) after NaCl F-C; (c) after NaCl D-A.
Materials 16 05615 g006
Materials 16 05615 g007
Figure 7. The equivalent circuit of reinforced RPC.
Figure 7. The equivalent circuit of reinforced RPC.
Materials 16 05615 g007
Materials 16 05615 g008
Figure 8. The R of rust of the reinforced RPC.
Figure 8. The R of rust of the reinforced RPC.
Materials 16 05615 g008
Materials 16 05615 g009
Figure 9. The Tafel curves of reinforced RPC. (a) The Tafel curves of reinforced RPC before NaCl action; (b) the Tafel curves of reinforced RPC after NaCl F-C; (c) the Tafel curves of reinforced RPC after NaCl D-A.
Figure 9. The Tafel curves of reinforced RPC. (a) The Tafel curves of reinforced RPC before NaCl action; (b) the Tafel curves of reinforced RPC after NaCl F-C; (c) the Tafel curves of reinforced RPC after NaCl D-A.
Materials 16 05615 g009
Materials 16 05615 g010
Figure 10. The corrosion rate of the steel bars.
Figure 10. The corrosion rate of the steel bars.
Materials 16 05615 g010
Table 1. The accumulated pass rate of the powder materials (%).
Table 1. The accumulated pass rate of the powder materials (%).
TypesParticle Size/μm
0.30.614864360
OPC0.130.332.3615.2228.2593.11100.00
BFS0.040.123.2519.3135.0897.86100.00
FA31.1458.3382.17100.00100.00100.00100.00
Quartz sand0.000.000.000.000.0423.93100.00
SAA0.060.240.561.153.9225.987.25
Table 2. Composition of the powder materials (%).
Table 2. Composition of the powder materials (%).
TypesSiO2Al2O3FexOyMgOCaOSO3K2ONa2OTi2OLoss on Ignition
OPC20.775.473.881.6961.832.68---3.08
BFS33.815.10.69.736.70.43.7---
FA90.600.230.610.250.430.207.50---
Quartz sand99.9-0.1-------
SAA4.679.33.95.71.5--0.9--
Table 3. The mixing proportions of RPC (kg/m3).
Table 3. The mixing proportions of RPC (kg/m3).
WaterOPCSAAFABFSQuartz SandWater Reducer
241.96733.290.00366.60109.99968.1216.14
241.96733.2991.67274.92109.99968.1216.14
241.96733.29183.35183.35109.99968.1216.14
241.96733.29274.9291.67109.99968.1216.14
241.96733.29366.600.00109.99968.1216.14
Table 4. The number of specimens and the standard deviation for testing parameters.
Table 4. The number of specimens and the standard deviation for testing parameters.
Measuring ParametersNumber of Specimens Standard Deviation
MR60.091
DME60.087
R60.093
EIS60.098
Tafel experiment60.093
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, H.; Wang, K.; Wang, H. The Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete with Secondary Aluminum Ash Exposed to NaCl Action. Materials 2023, 16, 5615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165615

AMA Style

Jiang H, Wang K, Wang H. The Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete with Secondary Aluminum Ash Exposed to NaCl Action. Materials. 2023; 16(16):5615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165615

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Hong, Kewei Wang, and Hui Wang. 2023. "The Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete with Secondary Aluminum Ash Exposed to NaCl Action" Materials 16, no. 16: 5615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165615

APA Style

Jiang, H., Wang, K., & Wang, H. (2023). The Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete with Secondary Aluminum Ash Exposed to NaCl Action. Materials, 16(16), 5615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165615

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop