Next Article in Journal
Microstructural Characterization of Fibric Peat Stabilized with Portland Cement and Silica Fume
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress of Polymeric Corrosion Inhibitor: Structure and Application
Previous Article in Journal
Fiber Aggregation in Nanocomposites: Aggregation Degree and Its Linear Relation with the Percolation Threshold
Previous Article in Special Issue
N+-Implantation on Nb Coating as Protective Layer for Metal Bipolar Plate in PEMFCs and Their Electrochemical Characteristics
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Application of Electrophoretic Deposition as an Advanced Technique of Inhibited Polymer Films Formation on Metals from Environmentally Safe Aqueous Solutions of Inhibited Formulations

Materials 2023, 16(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010019
by Natalia A. Shapagina * and Vladimir V. Dushik
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2023, 16(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010019
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors analyzed polymer films formed from aqueous solutions of organosilanes, corrosion inhibitors and their compositions. They try to introduce the EPD technique. However,  some issues should be addressed.

1. The title is too long and it is hard to read.

2. What's the disadvantage of EPD?

3.The authors should compared other techniques with EPD.

4. The language should be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, the authors presented a review of methods of polymer film formation and proposed the electrophoretic deposition EPD as an alternative method to form these polymer film coatings. This method is compared to traditional methods such as dipping and exposing the samples in a modifier solution. It is concluded that the EPD method can coat samples of different geometrical shapes with better performance and the risk of ignition of the materials used is reduced.

In the reviewer opinion, the paper can be recommended for publication in materials journal after addressing the following comments:

-  All the figures presented in the present manuscript are without any references. It is better to add the reference of each figure.

- It is recommended to replace in the title scheme 1 by figure 2.

- It is recommended that tables be added in each section to analyze the results and contributions of the various references in order to summarize these works and better see their contributions to the field.

- Figure 3: If possible, it is recommended to add a real figure of the process to better understand the EPD method.

- The comparison between APD and CPD presented at the end of section 3.1 can be presented in a table for greater clarity.

- Figure 6. Red circles are drawn in the figure to present the different defects. It is recommended to specify on the text the type of these defects and what is the cause.

- At the end of the manuscript, before the conclusion section, it is recommended to add a table comparing the different methods cited in the text, presenting the advantages and disadvantages of each technique and highlighting the alternatives proposed in the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept

Back to TopTop