Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of β-Titanium Ti-15Mo Alloy Produced by Combined Processing including ECAP-Conform and Drawing
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Coal Tar Pitches on Thermal Behaviour of a High-Volatile Bituminous Polish Coal
Previous Article in Journal
The Biomechanical Impact of Loss of an Implant in the Treatment with Mandibular Overdentures on Four Nonsplinted Mini Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanism of Anchored Bedding Rock Material under Impact Loading
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multi-Level Support Technology and Application of Deep Roadway Surrounding Rock in the Suncun Coal Mine, China

Materials 2022, 15(23), 8665; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238665
by Hengbin Chu 1,2, Guoqing Li 1,*, Zhijun Liu 2, Xuesheng Liu 1,3, Yunhao Wu 1 and Shenglong Yang 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8665; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238665
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Solving the problem of stability of mining operations is one of the most important issues in mining. The paper is current, well presented and with applicable results. Using the FLAC 3D program leads to good results that can lead to the identification of suitable support systems.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments on our manuscript.

Best regards.

Reviewer 2 Report

When I reviewed and evaluated the article with the title “Multi-level support technology and application of 2424 Upper-level roadway surrounding rock at -800m level in Suncun Coal Mine”, the deficiencies stated below in the article should be eliminated. If these major deficiencies are eliminated, it is appropriate for me to publish the article in "Materials".

 

1. The English of the paper is poor. Required to be checked by a native English speaker.

2. Numerical and analytical results should be given as tables and the results should be compared.

3. Line 81, Footwall and hanging wall can be used instead of coal rock

4. Adding the scheme of the project work area can make the paper more understandable.

5. Vertical stress of 29.05 MPa (Why?)

6. Figure1. Roadway section can be shown on the figure.

7. The support material used might be given as a table with its properties.

8. Tertiary support diagram can be given before numeric (FLAC-3D) figures.

 

9. In general, the paper should be written clearly and rearranged. Numerical studies can be given after analytical studies.

Best regards

 

 

Author Response

Thanks for your valuable advice, which not only gives us a clear understanding of the shortcomings and improvements of the paper but also points out the direction for the revision.

Responses to the comments from the reviewers. Please see attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your valuable advice, which not only gives us a clear understanding of the shortcomings and improvements of the paper but also points out the direction for the revision. 

Responses to the comments from the reviewers. Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop