Next Article in Journal
Application of an Adsorption Process on Selected Materials, Including Waste, as a Barrier to the Pesticide Penetration into the Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Layer Rubber-Based Composite Material and UHMWPE with High Wear Resistance
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dynamic Tensile Behavior of Woven C/SiC Composite: Experiments and Strain-Rate-Dependent Yield Criterion

Materials 2022, 15(13), 4679; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134679
by Jingwei Yu 1,2, Peiwei Zhang 1,2,*, Qiang Chen 1,2 and Qingguo Fei 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Materials 2022, 15(13), 4679; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134679
Submission received: 24 May 2022 / Revised: 18 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 4 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Authors did not show even a single image of the composite that they have fabricated. Figure 1 is purely a schematic. Add laboratory fabricated composite pictures in the manuscript.

2. Cite the standards utilized in the reference section.

3. English grammar and typos need a significant change/modification.

4. Not enough references are there.

5. Introduction must be broadened to attract more readers.

6. Cite the mentioned latest articles on woven based composites and SiC:

- 2021. Effect of functionalized silicon carbide nano‐particles as additive in cross‐linked PVA based composites for vibration damping application. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology27(4), pp.920-932.

- 2018. Recent progress in the development of SiC composites for nuclear fusion applications. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 511, pp.544-555.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is very interesting and well written as well explained. However, some aspects must be improved to be accepted to be published.

 

Comment #1:

Experiments

The process of the manufacture of the materials are not well explained. Please include pictures of the process and the properties of each raw material and the final C/SiC composites must be given.

 

Comment #2:

Figure 2c)

Figure of the strain gauge is not perceptible. Please include a Test sample as Figure 2b) with the strain gauge.

 

Comment #3:

Figure 4

Please explain each layer of Figure 4. It is not explained the difference between a,b,c and e,f,g

 

Conclusions:

Quantitatively analysis must be given and not only qualitatively.

Future improved work must be given.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept as is.

Reviewer 2 Report

The request changes were made and accepted by the reviewer.

Back to TopTop