Next Article in Journal
Terahertz Shielding Properties of Carbon Black Based Polymer Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Processing and Thermal Properties of Functional Core/Multi-Shell ZnAl/Ni/NiP Microparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers Created by Proton Implantation in a Diamond

by
Mariusz Mrózek
1,*,
Mateusz Schabikowski
2,
Marzena Mitura-Nowak
2,
Janusz Lekki
2,
Marta Marszałek
2,
Adam M. Wojciechowski
1 and
Wojciech Gawlik
1
1
Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Kraków, Poland
2
Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(4), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040833
Submission received: 29 December 2020 / Revised: 27 January 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 9 February 2021

Abstract

:
We present an experimental study of the longitudinal and transverse relaxation of ensembles of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV ) centers in a diamond monocrystal prepared by 1.8 MeV proton implantation. The focused proton beam was used to introduce vacancies at a 20 µ m depth layer. Applied doses were in the range of 1.5 × 10 13 to 1.5 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 . The samples were subsequently annealed in vacuum which resulted in a migration of vacancies and their association with the nitrogen present in the diamond matrix. The proton implantation technique proved versatile to control production of nitrogen-vacancy color centers in thin films.

1. Introduction

Negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV ) color centers in a diamond have been a focus of recent research due to their outstanding properties which make them promising candidates for fluorescent markers in biological systems [1,2] and for numerous applications e.g., in quantum information [3,4], magnetometry [5,6], and temperature sensing [7,8]. Successful application thus requires a sound knowledge of interaction of the NV centers with the environment. This motivates recent efforts to study the relaxation dynamics of the NV electron-spin polarization. Particularly, measurements of the longitudinal relaxation time T 1 (the decay lifetime for NVs population initialized to a ground-state magnetic sublevel) enable development of new techniques which use NV as a spin probe [9]. The spin phase coherence time ( T 2 ) is a critical figure of merit for the emerging quantum-based applications—for example, for ensemble magnetometry, the sensitivity scales as ( N S T 2 ) 1 / 2 , where N S is the number of interrogated spins [10]. In quantum computing, T 2 constrains the minimum gate operation time and limits the performance of quantum error correction protocols [11]. The phase coherence time ( T 2 ) is generally limited by stochastic processes, such as phonon interactions, which cause irreversible changes in the axial spin projection. Such processes are known as longitudinal relaxation with a characteristic timescale, T 1 [12].
For many sensing applications, thin and dense layers of NV centers are desired in order to maximize the signal while maintaining sufficiently short distance between the source and the sensing spins. Such layers have already been used for wide-field magnetic field imaging [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Although some NV centers and nitrogen atoms are always present in diamonds, the NV concentration can be substantially increased in a desired region by means of nitrogen ions’ implantation. A common alternative technique is the irradiation of the a priori nitrogen-rich sample (entire diamond or a doped layer) with electrons, protons, or ions [20,21,22,23]. It creates vacancies in the lattice and is followed by high-temperature (600 C) annealing that allows their migration and recombination with nitrogen present in the diamond sample. Importantly, the spatial- and ion-energy control of the implantation process enables tailoring of the local NV concentration distribution towards specific applications. As the implantation and irradiation processes cause lattice damage, particularly at high fluence, these processes should be well controlled to efficiently create NV centers while avoiding crystal damage and related spin-lifetime shortening. Continuous in-situ annealing during the irradiation/implantation has been used in Ref. [24] to enable efficient nitrogen to NV-center conversion with reduced vacancy clustering.
In this work, we analyze creation of NV centers using high-energy (1.8 MeV) proton implantation in nitrogen-rich ( [ N ] 50 ppm) diamonds. At such energies, protons penetrate up to ∼20 µ m into the diamond, which is sufficient to create vacancies in typically used NV sensing layers that have a thickness of 0.1–10 µ m. On the other hand, the limited proton range, as opposed to that of high-energy electrons ( 500 µ m at the energy of 5 MeV), efficiently reduces creation of vacancies and NV centers in the deeper layers of a bulk diamond, which may be favorable for limiting the background fluorescence. The work presented here builds upon the research carried out in Ref. [25]. A similar type of implantation was performed in [26] and the photoluminescence was studied. Here, we report on an investigation of the longitudinal T 1 and transverse T 2 spin relaxation times of NV ensembles as a function of proton implantation dose. This information is vital for numerous applications, for example in magnetometry [27].

2. Sample Preparation

The proton implantation was performed on two 3.0 × 3.0 × 0.3 mm 3 sized type Ib mono-crystalline diamond samples synthesized by the high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) technique. The (100)-oriented one side polished diamond samples were purchased from Element Six. The initial nitrogen concentration in both samples was [ N i ] 50 ppm.
Protons were implanted on the polished side of the samples using the ion beam from a Van de Graaff accelerator (located in the Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland) at the energy of 1.8 MeV with the spot of an approximately 20 µ m diameter. The samples were labeled as HEN1 and HEN2. Detailed information about the preparation of sample HEN1 can be found in Ref. [25]. The doses applied to both samples are listed in Table 1. Spots 1–6 refer to the sample HEN1 and spots 7–8 to sample HEN2.
After implantation, the samples were annealed for 2 h in a vacuum system at about 900 C in order to increase the diffusion of vacancies and stimulate the formation of NV centers.
Figure 1 shows photographs of two samples. Spots 1–6 and 7–8 are visible in Figure 1a,b, respectively. Spots 7–8 are characterized by the highest dose of protons. Figure 1c shows the fluorescence spectrum from individual marked points.
For the simulations of proton implantation in the diamond matrix, we used the SRIM 2013 suite [28] with the following parameters: ion energy 1.8 MeV, dose 1.5 × 10 16 cm 2 , atomic density 3.52 g/cm 3 , and the displacement threshold energy of 37.5 eV for the (100) direction (Ref. [29]). Figure 2 presents the simulated damage (created vacancies) due to the proton impact on the diamond sample for the dose of 1.5 × 10 16 cm 2 . As can be seen, for a 1.8 MeV proton beam, most vacancies are generated around the depth of 20 µ m. The dashed line in Figure 2 shows the nitrogen content in the tested diamond samples. For this dose of protons, the concentration of created vacancies exceeds the nitrogen concentration everywhere up to this depth.
Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra taken for five locations at spot 8. The characteristic Raman mode for a diamond crystals is not visible (1332 cm 1 ), only the N V 0 peak is seen at 1428 cm 1 [30]at this particular spot. We attribute it to an overwhelming contribution of the NV signal at this location. The spectra measured outside of the dark area are qualitatively very similar to each other and have a strong peak characteristic to the NV color centers at 3132 cm 1 . For the midpoint (number 3) the signal was amplified 5x.

3. Experiment

The experimental system is a confocal fluorescence microscope shown schematically in Figure 4a. A microscope objective (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Japan, UPLFLN 40×, NA = 0.75, WD = 0.51 mm) was used for focusing the green laser (Lighthouse Photonics, San Jose, Ca, USA, Sprout-G, 532 nm) excitation beam, as well as for the collection of fluorescence light. A dichroic mirror (Thorlabs Inc., Bergkirchen, Germany, DMLP567) and an optical long-pass filter (Thorlabs Inc., Bergkirchen, Germany FEL0600) allow for the detection of light with a wavelength in the range of approximately 600–850 nm using either an avalanche photodiode (Thorlabs Inc., Bergkirchen, Germany, APD130A) or a compact optical spectrometer (Thorlabs Inc., Bergkirchen, Germany, CCS175). Our study was performed in room temperature. Raman spectra were recorded by a spectrometer (Witec GmbH, Ulm, Germany, Alpha 300).
For relaxation time measurements, a microwave (MW) signal of the frequency of 2.87 GHz from a generator (Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA, SRS SG396) is fed to a high-power amplifier (Mini-Circuits, Brooklyn, NY, USA, ZHL-16W-43+) and delivered to a loop-gap type antenna structure on a printed circuit board (PCB). The antenna structure is similar to the one described in the reference [31] and is designed to produce a uniform magnetic-field distribution in the range of ∼ 1 mm diameter around its center while maintaining a central hole diameter of 3 mm. Samples were placed on glass coverslips directly on the antenna boards. For the T 1 and T 2 measurements, the MW power was delivered in the form of pulses produced and controlled by a programmable pulse generator.
The T 1 measurements were based on the “relaxation in the dark method”, [12,32], whereas T 2 was measured with the help of the Hahn spin-echo [33]. Figure 4b,c show the timing sequence of the MW and optical pulses used in the experiments to measure T 1 and T 2 . For the T 1 and T 2 measurements, the length of the microwave π pulse was 50 ns.

4. Results

Our initial measurements focused on the examination of the fluorescence level of samples exposed to various irradiation doses at a constant power of the pumping laser (a 1-mW green laser). As the implantation dose increases, the signal level of fluorescence increases too until no more nitrogen–vacancy color centers can be created. Figure 5a shows this specific case (the black squares for the sample HEN1). These data are consistent with those presented in the paper [25]. The elongated shape of the irradiated areas on HEN2 results from an instability of the proton beam throughout the prolonged implantation. The red asterisks show the results for the sample HEN2. It can be seen that the level of fluorescence for spots 7 and 8 (Figure 1b) is similar to the level of HEN1 though somehow higher than for the trend of HEN1. This is because the implemented doses no longer produce vacancies in the sample but only damage the diamond structure, which may additionally contribute to the background of scattered light. That damage is seen in Figure 1b in the form of a black spot in the middle of the measuring point. A similar observation of a fluorescence–intensity stabilization for high implantation doses was also presented in [34].
In addition to a standard fluorescence measurements, we have also conducted an Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance (ODMR) study with the investigated samples. Figure 5b shows the contrast level of ODMR versus the implantation dose of protons and its decrease with the increase of the dose (the data for points 7 and 8 are lower than the expectation from the HEN1 trend, which is consistent with our interpretation as local sample damage by the stronger doses). A similar effect was observed in Ref. [35], where the influence of local strain in diamond induced by interstitial carbon atoms was studied at a high density of NV centers. The authors of [35] developed a model taking into account the lattice swelling due to interstitial carbon atoms and explained the evolution of ODMR spectra at elevated NV densities. Our findings are also in agreement with this model.
An important consequence of any high-energy particle irradiation is the creation of vacancies in diamond which may later be bound to nitrogen and form the NV centers. After annealing, the NV density is increased, which substantially enlarges the fluorescence intensity observed from the stronger irradiated samples (Figure 1). On the other hand, the local increase in defect density enhances the spin relaxation relative to the non-irradiated area because of the dipole–dipole interactions between NV center and paramagnetic defects that scale with the distance as r 3 . The NV distance to such defects is, in turn, a function of the density ρ which for low-defect density can be assumed to scale as r ρ 1 / 3 . However, that scaling fails when more impurities occur in the diamond lattice and a number of processes such as annealing, Frenkel-pair recombination, vacancy clustering, migration to the surface, etc. take place. To determine the effect of proton–beam irradiation on relaxation, we measure the longitudinal, T 1 , and transverse, T 2 , relaxation times and their dependencies on implantation doses.
Figure 6 shows the relaxation rates (inverse of the relaxation time) obtained in our experiment. The data for longitudinal relaxation rate [Figure 6a] and the transverse one [Figure 6b] increase with the implantation doses and can be fitted to linear functions (in logarithmic scales). For Figure 6a, the slope of the dose dependence of the 1 / T 1 rate was 0.16, which is twice as large as for the 1 / T 2 dependence shown in Figure 6b, where the slope was 0.08. These results appear to be consistent with the earlier observations [26,36,37,38,39] where the role of dipolar interaction in dense samples was identified. In Ref. [40], the dephasing solely due to the NV–NV dipolar interaction for [NV] 45 ppm concentration was estimated to be around 2 π × 100 kHz, which is also consistent with our results after their rescaling to NV density of our samples. When discussing the effects of relaxation, however, the role of other (mainly P1 and N3) centers must not be forgotten at higher densities at higher densities [41,42,43,44].
In Table 2, we collected data for these experiments. The presented references do not contain nitrogen implantation, only the ions used to create the vacancy. The last row in the table is for non-implanted samples.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this work presents the characterization of spin relaxation in NV centers produced by 1.8 MeV proton implantation with doses ranging from 1.5 × 10 13 to 1.5 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 followed by annealing of the diamond sample. The proton implantation results in an interesting depth profile of the vacancy distribution: starting from 1 micrometer below the surface, the vacancy density slowly increases with the depth up to about 16 µ m, where it starts to rapidly increase, peaking at around 20 µ m. This opens up a possibility of using proton implantation for creating NV centers with a relatively uniform depth profile when the nitrogen-doped layer is a few micrometers thin. For many sensing applications, thin and dense layers of NV centers are desired in order to maximize the signal while maintaining sufficiently short distance between the source and the sensing spins. Therefore, high-energy protons seem particularly suitable for the creation of vacancies in typically used NV sensing layers that have a thickness of 0.1–10 µ m.
Additionally, spectroscopic analysis of the irradiated samples revealed diamond damage caused by the largest applied doses, correlated with the drop of the fluorescence of the affected areas, which indicates limitations of the useful doses.
Finally, the measurements of the longitudinal and transverse relaxation times demonstrated their dependence on the implantation doses, which we attributed to dipole–dipole interactions. These results are comparable with the literature values for similar, nitrogen-rich diamond samples, although implanted with different ions or irradiated with electrons. The presented measurements should help to guide the preparation of microscale diamond NV sensors for magnetometry or bio-magnetometry, either thin diamond plates, or shallow nitrogen-doped layers overgrown on a high quality diamond or in micrometer-sized diamonds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and A.M.W.; Formal analysis, M.M. (Mariusz Mrózek); Funding acquisition, W.G.; Investigation, M.M. (Mariusz Mrózek) and M.M.-N.; Resources, M.S. and J.L.; Software, M.M. (Mariusz Mrózek); Supervision, M.M. (Marta Marszałek), A.M.W. and W.G.; Visualization, M.M. (Mariusz Mrózek); Writing—original draft, M.M. (Mariusz Mrózek), A.M.W.; Writing—review & editing, M.S., M.M.-N., J.L., M.M. (Marta Marszałek), and W.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Polish National Science Centre under Grant No. 2016/21/B/ST7/01430 and 2020/04/X/ST2/00074, and the Foundation for Polish Science under the project Team-NET No. POIR.04.04.00-00-1644/18.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Polish National Science Centre under Grant Nos. 2016/21/B/ST7/01430 and 2020/04/X/ST2/00074, and the Foundation for Polish Science under the project Team-NET No. POIR.04.04.00-00-1644/18.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hall, L.; Simpson, D.; Hollenberg, L. Nanoscale sensing and imaging in biology using the nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. MRS Bull. 2013, 38, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumar, R.; Pandit, P.; Pal, P.; Dhakate, S.R.; Pant, R.P.; Kumar, R.; Avasthi, D.K.; Singh, D.K. Engineering bright fluorescent nitrogen-vacancy (NV) nano-diamonds: Role of low-energy ion-irradiation parameters. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 085023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Unden, T.; Balasubramanian, P.; Louzon, D.; Vinkler, Y.; Plenio, M.B.; Markham, M.; Twitchen, D.; Stacey, A.; Lovchinsky, I.; Sushkov, A.O.; et al. Quantum Metrology Enhanced by Repetitive Quantum Error Correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 230502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rembold, P.; Oshnik, N.; Müller, M.M.; Montangero, S.; Calarco, T.; Neu, E. Introduction to quantum optimal control for quantum sensing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. AVS Quantum Sci. 2020, 2, 024701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Acosta, V.M.; Bauch, E.; Ledbetter, M.P.; Santori, C.; Fu, K.M.C.; Barclay, P.E.; Beausoleil, R.G.; Linget, H.; Roch, J.F.; Treussart, F.; et al. Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen-vacancy centers for magnetometry applications. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 115202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Taylor, J.M.; Cappellaro, P.; Childress, L.; Jiang, L.; Budker, D.; Hemmer, P.R.; Yacoby, A.; Walsworth, R.; Lukin, M.D. High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution. Nat. Phys. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kucsko, G.; Choi, S.; Choi, J.; Maurer, P.C.; Zhou, H.; Landig, R.; Sumiya, H.; Onoda, S.; Isoya, J.; Jelezko, F.; et al. Critical Thermalization of a Disordered Dipolar Spin System in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 023601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kehayias, P.; Mrózek, M.; Acosta, V.M.; Jarmola, A.; Rudnicki, D.S.; Folman, R.; Gawlik, W.; Budker, D. Microwave saturation spectroscopy of nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 245202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Page, M.R.; McCullian, B.A.; Purser, C.M.; Schulze, J.G.; Nakatani, T.M.; Wolfe, C.S.; Childress, J.R.; McConney, M.E.; Howe, B.M.; Hammel, P.C.; et al. Optically detected ferromagnetic resonance in diverse ferromagnets via nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 124902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Acosta, V.M.; Bauch, E.; Jarmola, A.; Zipp, L.J.; Ledbetter, M.P.; Budker, D. Broadband magnetometry by infrared-absorption detection of nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 174104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ladd, T.D.; Jelezko, F.; Laflamme, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Monroe, C.; O’Brien, J.L. Quantum Comput. Nature 2010, 464, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mrózek, M.; Rudnicki, D.; Kehayias, P.; Jarmola, A.; Budker, D.; Gawlik, W. Longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond. EPJ Quantum Technol. 2015, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pham, L.M.; Le Sage, D.; Stanwix, P.L.; Yeung, T.K.; Glenn, D.; Trifonov, A.; Cappellaro, P.; Hemmer, P.R.; Lukin, M.D.; Park, H.; et al. Magnetic field imaging with nitrogen-vacancy ensembles. New J. Phys. 2011, 13, 045021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chipaux, M.; Tallaire, A.; Achard, J.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Jacques, V.; Roch, J.F.; Debuisschert, T. Magnetic imaging with an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Eur. Phys. J. D 2015, 69, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Le Sage, D.; Arai, K.; Glenn, D.R.; DeVience, S.J.; Pham, L.M.; Rahn-Lee, L.; Lukin, M.D.; Yacoby, A.; Komeili, A.; Walsworth, R.L. Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature 2013, 496, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Simpson, D.A.; Tetienne, J.P.; McCoey, J.M.; Ganesan, K.; Hall, L.T.; Petrou, S.; Scholten, R.E.; Hollenberg, L.C.L. Magneto-optical imaging of thin magnetic films using spins in diamond. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Smits, J.; Berzins, A.; Gahbauer, F.H.; Ferber, R.; Erglis, K.; Cebers, A.; Prikulis, J. Estimating the magnetic moment of microscopic magnetic sources from their magnetic field distribution in a layer of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centres in diamond. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 73, 20701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nowodzinski, A.; Chipaux, M.; Toraille, L.; Jacques, V.; Roch, J.F.; Debuisschert, T. Nitrogen-Vacancy centers in diamond for current imaging at the redistributive layer level of Integrated Circuits. Microelectron. Reliab. 2015, 55, 1549–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tetienne, J.P.; Dontschuk, N.; Broadway, D.A.; Stacey, A.; Simpson, D.A.; Hollenberg, L.C.L. Quantum imaging of current flow in graphene. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Aharonovich, I.; Santori, C.; Fairchild, B.A.; Orwa, J.; Ganesan, K.; Fu, K.M.C.; Beausoleil, R.G.; Greentree, A.D.; Prawer, S. Producing optimized ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy color centers for quantum information applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 124904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Botsoa, J.; Sauvage, T.; Adam, M.P.; Desgardin, P.; Leoni, E.; Courtois, B.; Treussart, F.; Barthe, M.F. Optimal conditions for NV- center formation in type-1b diamond studied using photoluminescence and positron annihilation spectroscopies. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 125209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. McLellan, C.A.; Myers, B.A.; Kraemer, S.; Ohno, K.; Awschalom, D.D.; Bleszynski Jayich, A.C. Patterned Formation of Highly Coherent Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers Using a Focused Electron Irradiation Technique. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 2450–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Barry, J.F.; Schloss, J.M.; Bauch, E.; Turner, M.J.; Hart, C.A.; Pham, L.M.; Walsworth, R.L. Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2020, 92, 015004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Choi, J.; Choi, S.; Kucsko, G.; Maurer, P.C.; Shields, B.J.; Sumiya, H.; Onoda, S.; Isoya, J.; Demler, E.; Jelezko, F.; et al. Depolarization Dynamics in a Strongly Interacting Solid-State Spin Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 093601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schabikowski, M.; Wojciechowski, A.M.; Mitura-Nowak, M.; Mrózek, M.; Kruk, A.; Rajchel, B.; Gawlik, W.; Marszałek, M. Optical characterization of nitrogen-vacancy centers created by proton implantation in diamond. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, H.; Bettiol, A.A. Influence of thermal annealing on the properties of proton implanted diamond waveguides. Carbon 2021, 171, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shin, C.S.; Avalos, C.E.; Butler, M.C.; Trease, D.R.; Seltzer, S.J.; Peter Mustonen, J.; Kennedy, D.J.; Acosta, V.M.; Budker, D.; Pines, A.; et al. Room-temperature operation of a radiofrequency diamond magnetometer near the shot-noise limit. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 124519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ziegler, J.F.; Ziegler, M.; Biersack, J. SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms. 2010, 268, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Koike, J.; Parkin, D.M.; Mitchell, T.E. Displacement threshold energy for type IIa diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 60, 1450–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Turaga, S.P.; Jin, H.; Teo, E.J.; Bettiol, A.A. Cross-sectional hyperspectral imaging of proton implanted diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 021904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sasaki, K.; Monnai, Y.; Saijo, S.; Fujita, R.; Watanabe, H.; Ishi-Hayase, J.; Itoh, K.M.; Abe, E. Broadband, large-area microwave antenna for optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2016, 87, 053904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jarmola, A.; Acosta, V.M.; Jensen, K.; Chemerisov, S.; Budker, D. Temperature- and Magnetic-Field-Dependent Longitudinal Spin Relaxation in Nitrogen-Vacancy Ensembles in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 197601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hahn, E.L. Spin Echoes. Phys. Rev. 1950, 80, 580–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pezzagna, S.; Naydenov, B.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Meijer, J. Creation efficiency of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 065017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Levchenko, A.O.; Vasil’ev, V.V.; Zibrov, S.A.; Zibrov, A.S.; Sivak, A.V.; Fedotov, I.V. Inhomogeneous broadening of optically detected magnetic resonance of the ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond by interstitial carbon atoms. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 102402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jarmola, A.; Berzins, A.; Smits, J.; Smits, K.; Prikulis, J.; Gahbauer, F.; Ferber, R.; Erts, D.; Auzinsh, M.; Budker, D. Longitudinal spin-relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy centers in electron irradiated diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 242403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Trofimov, S.D.; Tarelkin, S.A.; Bolshedvorskii, S.V.; Bormashov, V.S.; Troshchiev, S.Y.; Golovanov, A.V.; Luparev, N.V.; Prikhodko, D.D.; Boldyrev, K.N.; Terentiev, S.A.; et al. Spatially controlled fabrication of single NV centers in IIa HPHT diamond. Opt. Mater. Express 2020, 10, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Stepanov, V.; Takahashi, S. Determination of nitrogen spin concentration in diamond using double electron-electron resonance. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 024421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Van Wyk, J.A.; Reynhardt, E.C.; High, G.L.; Kiflawi, I. The dependences of ESR line widths and spin - spin relaxation times of single nitrogen defects on the concentration of nitrogen defects in diamond. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 1997, 30, 1790–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Choi, S.; Choi, J.; Landig, R.; Kucsko, G.; Zhou, H.; Isoya, J.; Jelezko, F.; Onoda, S.; Sumiya, H.; Khemani, V.; et al. Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system. Nature 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Alsid, S.T.; Barry, J.F.; Pham, L.M.; Schloss, J.M.; O’Keeffe, M.F.; Cappellaro, P.; Braje, D.A. Photoluminescence Decomposition Analysis: A Technique to Characterize N-V Creation in Diamond. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 12, 044003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bauch, E.; Singh, S.; Lee, J.; Hart, C.A.; Schloss, J.M.; Turner, M.J.; Barry, J.F.; Pham, L.; Bar-Gill, N.; Yelin, S.F.; et al. Decoherence of dipolar spin ensembles in diamond. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.08763. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bauch, E.; Hart, C.A.; Schloss, J.M.; Turner, M.J.; Barry, J.F.; Kehayias, P.; Singh, S.; Walsworth, R.L. Ultralong Dephasing Times in Solid-State Spin Ensembles via Quantum Control. Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8, 031025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lei, C.; Peng, S.; Ju, C.; Yung, M.H.; Du, J. Decoherence Control of Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Sci. Rep. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wojciechowski, A.M.; Karadas, M.; Osterkamp, C.; Jankuhn, S.; Meijer, J.; Jelezko, F.; Huck, A.; Andersen, U.L. Precision temperature sensing in the presence of magnetic field noise and vice versa using nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 013502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kleinsasser, E.E.; Stanfield, M.M.; Banks, J.K.Q.; Zhu, Z.; Li, W.D.; Acosta, V.M.; Watanabe, H.; Itoh, K.M.; Fu, K.M.C. High density nitrogen-vacancy sensing surface created via He+ ion implantation of 12C diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 202401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Genish, H.; Ganesan, K.; Stacey, A.; Prawer, S.; Rosenbluh, M. Effect of radiation damage on the quantum optical properties of nitrogen vacancies in diamond. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 109, 108049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rondin, L.; Tetienne, J.P.; Hingant, T.; Roch, J.F.; Maletinsky, P.; Jacques, V. Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 056503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The proton-irradiated samples: (a) the sample HEN1 with six areas of the implanted doses in the range of 1.5 × 10 13 to 1.5 × 10 16 ions/cm 2 ; (b) the sample HEN2 with two areas of the implanted dose range of 4.5 × 10 16 to 1.5 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 ; (c) the fluorescence spectra from the marked individual spots. The zero-phonon line (ZPL) is marked with a dotted line.
Figure 1. The proton-irradiated samples: (a) the sample HEN1 with six areas of the implanted doses in the range of 1.5 × 10 13 to 1.5 × 10 16 ions/cm 2 ; (b) the sample HEN2 with two areas of the implanted dose range of 4.5 × 10 16 to 1.5 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 ; (c) the fluorescence spectra from the marked individual spots. The zero-phonon line (ZPL) is marked with a dotted line.
Materials 14 00833 g001
Figure 2. The graph shows the number of vacancies produced by proton irradiation with a dose 1.5 × 10 16 cm 2 depending on the depth in the sample. It can be seen that the largest number of vacancies is generated at a depth of 20 µ m. The dashed line indicates the amount of nitrogen in the tested samples. The inset shows the same plot but with a linear scale.
Figure 2. The graph shows the number of vacancies produced by proton irradiation with a dose 1.5 × 10 16 cm 2 depending on the depth in the sample. It can be seen that the largest number of vacancies is generated at a depth of 20 µ m. The dashed line indicates the amount of nitrogen in the tested samples. The inset shows the same plot but with a linear scale.
Materials 14 00833 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectra collected in five locations, shown in the inset, at spot 8 of HEN2. The signal for location 3 was magnified five times for clarity. The vertical dashed line represents the peak of the Zero Phonon Line (ZPL) for the nitrogen-vacancy color center (3132 cm 1 ).
Figure 3. Raman spectra collected in five locations, shown in the inset, at spot 8 of HEN2. The signal for location 3 was magnified five times for clarity. The vertical dashed line represents the peak of the Zero Phonon Line (ZPL) for the nitrogen-vacancy color center (3132 cm 1 ).
Materials 14 00833 g003
Figure 4. Schematics of the measurement setup: (a) the confocal setup, D—detector, L—lens, F—filter, DM—dichroic mirror, MO—microscope objective, S—sample, A—MW antenna, AOM—acusto-optical modulator. The optical and microwave pulse sequence used for T 1 (b) and T 2 (c) measurements. The upper (green) rectangles mark the optical excitation, whereas the lower (blue) ones represent the MW pulses.
Figure 4. Schematics of the measurement setup: (a) the confocal setup, D—detector, L—lens, F—filter, DM—dichroic mirror, MO—microscope objective, S—sample, A—MW antenna, AOM—acusto-optical modulator. The optical and microwave pulse sequence used for T 1 (b) and T 2 (c) measurements. The upper (green) rectangles mark the optical excitation, whereas the lower (blue) ones represent the MW pulses.
Materials 14 00833 g004
Figure 5. The fluorescence level from different spots versus the implantation dose of protons (black squares-HEN1, red stars-HEN2) (a) and the ODMR contrast versus an irradiation dose (b).
Figure 5. The fluorescence level from different spots versus the implantation dose of protons (black squares-HEN1, red stars-HEN2) (a) and the ODMR contrast versus an irradiation dose (b).
Materials 14 00833 g005
Figure 6. The longitudinal relaxation rate (a) and the transverse relaxation rate (b) as a function of an implantation dose (black squares-HEN1, red stars-HEN2). Linear functions were fitted to the data on the graphs. The slope for (a) was 0.16 and was twice as large as for the data from (b) 0.08.
Figure 6. The longitudinal relaxation rate (a) and the transverse relaxation rate (b) as a function of an implantation dose (black squares-HEN1, red stars-HEN2). Linear functions were fitted to the data on the graphs. The slope for (a) was 0.16 and was twice as large as for the data from (b) 0.08.
Materials 14 00833 g006
Table 1. Proton–dose values of all implanted spots.
Table 1. Proton–dose values of all implanted spots.
Spot NumberDose [ions/cm 2 ]
1 1.5 × 10 13
2 1.5 × 10 14
3 4.5 × 10 14
4 1.5 × 10 15
5 4.5 × 10 15
6 1.5 × 10 16
7 4.5 × 10 16
8 1.5 × 10 17
Table 2. Table comparing type of diamond, initial N concentration, energy of incident particles, type of implantation, depth of penetration, dose, value of longitudinal, and transverse relaxation time for selected references.
Table 2. Table comparing type of diamond, initial N concentration, energy of incident particles, type of implantation, depth of penetration, dose, value of longitudinal, and transverse relaxation time for selected references.
Type of DiamondInitial N Concentration [ppm]Energy [MeV]Type ImplantationDepth [ μ m]Dose [cm 2 ] T 1 [ms] T 2 [ μ s]Authors
HPHT2000.2electron20 1.1 × 10 19 2.5 × 10 21 4.8–0.83 Jarmola et al. [36]
CVD0.11electron 1 × 10 15 5 × 10 19 5.5100–300Alsid et al. [41]
CVD101.8He + 1 1 × 10 15 1 ( T 2 * )Wojciechowski et al. [45]
HPHT CVD50–0.50.05He + 0.25 1 × 10 10 0.3 ( T 2 * )Trofimov et al. [37]
CVD0.0010.15–0.05He + 0.1 1 × 10 9 1 × 10 13 1.5 ( T 2 * )Kleinsasser et al. [46]
CVD0.0052He + 3.4 1 × 10 12 1 × 10 15 150Genish et al. [47]
CVD2002proton25 1 × 10 15 1 × 10 16 Jin et al. [26]
HPHT501.8proton20 1.5 × 10 13 1.5 × 10 17 6–1.252.5–1.1This paper
HPHT CVD100
0.001
non implantation 1 × 10 10 1
300
Rodin et al. [48]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mrózek, M.; Schabikowski, M.; Mitura-Nowak, M.; Lekki, J.; Marszałek, M.; Wojciechowski, A.M.; Gawlik, W. Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers Created by Proton Implantation in a Diamond. Materials 2021, 14, 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040833

AMA Style

Mrózek M, Schabikowski M, Mitura-Nowak M, Lekki J, Marszałek M, Wojciechowski AM, Gawlik W. Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers Created by Proton Implantation in a Diamond. Materials. 2021; 14(4):833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040833

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mrózek, Mariusz, Mateusz Schabikowski, Marzena Mitura-Nowak, Janusz Lekki, Marta Marszałek, Adam M. Wojciechowski, and Wojciech Gawlik. 2021. "Nitrogen-Vacancy Color Centers Created by Proton Implantation in a Diamond" Materials 14, no. 4: 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040833

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop