1. Introduction
With the rapid development of China’s intercity high-speed railway, quality requirements for the intercity railway subgrade project have increased. High-strength, high-stiffness, uniformly changed subgrade with long-term stability is the prerequisite for ensuring the safe and stable operation of high-speed trains. The Chinese National Standards “Code for Design of Intercity Railway” (TB10623-2014) and “Code for Design of Railway Earth Structure” (TB10001-2016) stipulate that when fine-grained soil fillers are used for the subgrade bed of ballastless track subgrade and, below, the fine-grained soil filler should be improved prior to use [
1,
2]. Loess is widely distributed along the Xi’an–Hancheng intercity high-speed railway project and has become the main road construction material. Loess is porous and has low bearing capacity and high compressibility; it is also prone to significant settlement after immersion in water [
3]. Since loess is a fine-grained soil filler, it needs to be improved with cement. Key to the application of cement-modified loess (CML) is the accurate assessment of its strength characteristics and the factors influencing those characteristics.
Sumesh et al. investigated the mechanical strength of soil mixed with cement and observed that an appropriate amount of cement can effectively improve strength characteristics of soil. [
4]. Nilo et al. studied the influence of different cement contents on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cement-modified loess, noting that the UCS of cement soil increases linearly with increasing cement dosage at the same compaction level and the effect of water content on the compressive strength of cement soil is significantly greater than that of the cement dosage [
5]. Xing [
6], Mohamed [
7], and Yong et al. [
8] combined scanning electron microscopy with X-ray diffraction to determine the ions affecting the structure and strength of cement-modified soil: Al
3+, Ca
2+, Mg
2+, and others. Correia [
9] and Chore et al. [
10] used unconfined compressive strength tests and split tensile tests to, respectively, study the compressive and tensile strength characteristics of cement–soil mixed with fiber. Subramaniam et al. performed a series of resonant column tests and cyclic triaxial experiments to study the effects of effective confining pressure, curing stress, cement content, initial clay water content, and curing time on the shear modulus reduction and damping ratio of cement-treated marine clay [
11]. Liu et al. performed dynamic triaxial tests on cement and lime-modified soil blended at various ratios. Their results reveal that, after repeated freeze–thaw cycles, the performance of the modified soil was better than before the modification, and the cement-modified soil performance was superior to that of lime-modified soil [
12]. Xiao et al. used cement to treat mixed fill, studied the influence of curing time and cement dosage on the compressive strength of cement soil by controlling the water–cement ratio, and established a single-factor compressive strength prediction equation [
13]. Li observed that the mechanical properties of CML gradually improve with increasing cement dosage and denoted that the compressive strength of modified loess with a cement dosage of 3% was greater than 0.35 MPa, meeting the design requirements for the strength of the bottom filler for high-speed railway foundation [
14]. Combining the construction practice and indoor test results of railway subgrade engineering in collapsible loess areas, Chen suggested that a 4% cement dosage should be used for the improved loess filler at the bottom of the subgrade bed [
15]. For the Bao-lan Passenger Line foundation project, Fang et al. used unconfined compressive strength and axial split tests to analyze the effect of water content on the mechanical strength of the modified loess with a 5% cement dosage [
16].
Most of the above studies are based on the traditional heavy compaction test method (HCTM) and the static pressure compaction method (SPCM) to form specimens. The Chinese standard “Code for Design of Railway Earth Structure” and “Code for Soil Test of Railway Engineering” also use the HCTM to determine the optimal moisture content and maximum dry density and SPCM to form specimens [
2,
17]. UCS is used in evaluation of the performance of subgrade engineering and is an important parameter for determining the optimal cement dosage. The current heavy-duty compaction standard was established in the early 21st century to be compatible with compaction mechanical performance at that time, with characteristics of simple operation and low equipment cost. However, with the development of modern transportation and construction technology and the deepening of engineering practice, the traditional method has lagged behind actual practice. The optimal moisture content determined by the HCTM is too large, and the maximum dry density too small; the correlation between the strength of specimens formed by SPCM and the actual core strength of the road surface is less than 70% [
18]. To solve these problems, Jiang et al. studied the effects of compaction method on the mechanical properties of inorganic binder-stabilized materials [
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23]. They verified the reliability of VVCM in the compaction of cement-stabilized materials in the laboratory by optimizing the working parameters of the vertical vibration test equipment (VVTE). Their results show that the correlation between the mechanical strength of the cement-stabilized crushed stone specimens formed by VVCM and the mechanical strength of the on-site core could reach 93%. However, the effects of VVCM on the mechanical properties of CML have yet to be studied.
In addition, due to the widespread distribution of loess in China and its variable technical properties, there are many factors affecting the strength characteristics of CML. Even at a given cement dosage, the engineering characteristics of modified loess fillers in different regions will be different [
24]. There are few studies on the influence of the compaction coefficient on the mechanical strength of intercity railway subgrade fillers, preventing engineers from fully grasping the change law of CML subgrade strength characteristics. In addition, the relevant intercity railway subgrade design specifications use only seven-day-saturated UCS to control the cement dosage, and there is no specific requirement for the strength, stability, or durability of the subgrade [
1]. A single strength index cannot reflect the roadbed’s multi-functional requirements for CML filler. Empirical values for cement content are often used in engineering practice, even though they may not fully incorporate the strength and water stability of loess subgrade, leading to potential economic waste.
Therefore, in the context of the Xi’an–Hancheng intercity high-speed railway project, this paper first evaluates the applicability of VVCM by testing the mechanical strength of laboratory-formed specimens and on-site core specimens. Next, the effects of VVCM on the mechanical strength of CML, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and splitting strength (SS), are systematically studied, leading to construction of a strength prediction equation. The influences of the cement dosage, the compaction coefficient, and the curing time on the mechanical strength of CML are then analyzed. The research results provide a strong theoretical framework for the design of loess subgrade for intercity railways.
4. Conclusions
VVCM was used to form specimens to study the mechanical strength of CML and the factors that influence those properties. Based on laboratory mechanical tests of CML strength, the following conclusions are drawn:
The correlation between the mechanical strength of VVCM molded specimens and on-site core samples was as high as 85.8%, in contrast to the <70% corresponding correlation between SPCM molded specimens and on-site core samples. Clearly, VVCM molded specimens can more accurately simulate field construction and predict CML properties.
The unconfined compressive strength and splitting strength of CML showed a linear growth trend with increasing cement dosage and compaction coefficient. During the CML subgrade filling process, the dosage of cement can be appropriately reduced by increasing the subgrade filler’s compaction coefficient.
This linear growth trend in CML mechanical strength with increasing cement dosage and compaction coefficient holds for a variety of cement dosages and compaction coefficients. The mechanical strength growth rate in the early stage is significantly greater than in the later stage. Mechanical strength growth tends to slow down after 28 days.
The VVCM developed for the compaction of CML has higher reliability than the traditional SPCM and can accurately reflect the mechanical properties of CML. The influences of various factors on the mechanical strength of CML prepared by VVCM were studied, providing a basis for determining the amount of cement, the compaction coefficient, and the curing time required in any given VVCM engineering application. Two proposed strength prediction models can be used to predict CML mechanical strength for various curing times, thereby reducing the extent of ad hoc experimentation needed. However, the data measured in the laboratory and on-site still mismatch. To make the lab values better match the on-site values, we will propose correction factors through a large number of tests carried out in the future.