Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Periodic Spatial Perturbations on the Emission Rates of Quantum Dots near Graphene Platforms
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Properties and Microstructure of Concrete with Waste Basalt Powder Addition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Situ Growth Behavior of SiC Whiskers with High Aspect Ratio in the Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(16), 3502; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163502
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 25 July 2020 / Accepted: 29 July 2020 / Published: 8 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)

Abstract

:
Aiming to provide key materials in order to improve the fracture toughness of ZrB2 ceramics, ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ grown SiC whiskers were successfully synthesized via a simple molten-salt-assisted ferrous-catalyzed carbothermal reduction method. Thermodynamic calculations on the ZrO2-SiO2-B2O3-C-Fe system were carried out. The effects of heating temperature and ferrous catalyst amount on the growth behavior of SiC whiskers in ZrB2-SiC composite powders were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results showed that the aspect ratio of SiC whiskers and the relative content of ZrB2 particles increased with increasing heating temperature (1523–1723 K) and a molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 from 0:1 to 0.2:1. Phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders were obtained at 1723 K when the molar ratio of raw materials was 0.2:0.5:1:1.5:8.4 (Fe:NaCl:ZrSiO4:B2O3:C). Single crystalline β-SiC whiskers with a mean diameter of 0.15 μm and an aspect ratio of 70–120 were homogeneously distributed in the final composite powders. A molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed vapor–solid mechanism was promoted for the growth mechanism of in situ grown SiC whiskers.

1. Introduction

Owing to their unique advantages including low density, high melting point, and stable chemical properties, ZrB2 ultrahigh-temperature ceramics are promising materials for leading edges and propulsion components of hypersonic aerospace vehicles and advanced reusable atmospheric reentry vehicles [1,2,3]. However, they suffer from difficult densification, poor oxidation resistance, and low fracture toughness [4]. Incorporating SiC whiskers into the ZrB2 ceramic matrix was found to be effective in improving these performances, especially for fracture toughness [5,6,7]. For example, fracture toughness of monolithic ZrB2 ceramics was commonly only 3–4 MPa·m1/2 [8], while that increased to above 5 MPa·m1/2 through a bridging toughening mechanism if 20 vol % SiC whiskers were added [6]. However, except for the inevitable grinding damage, it was sometimes difficult to obtain the uniform dispersion of SiC whiskers, which limited the improvement of the performance of ZrB2-SiC composite ceramics. An effective way to overcome the problems is to synthesize ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ grown SiC whiskers.
ZrB2-SiC composite powders have been synthesized through various approaches [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Xie [10] synthesized spherical ZrB2-SiC composite powders ranging from 100 nm to 300 nm through a one-step reduction process of ZrO2, B4C, carbon black, and silicon. Li [11] prepared ZrB2-SiC composite powders by molten-salt-mediated reduction of ZrSiO4, B2O3, activated carbon, and Mg, which exhibited grain sizes of several microns and comprised SiC nanoparticles well distributed in the ZrB2 matrix. ZrB2-SiC composite powders were synthesized by Cao [12] via a combined sol–gel and microwave boro/carbothermal reduction process using zirconium oxychloride, boric acid, tetraethoxysilane, and glucose as starting materials; the resulting crystalline sizes of ZrB2 and SiC were about 58 and 27 nm, respectively. The as-prepared powders thus obtained were with isometric morphology. Some studies on anisotropic ZrB2-SiC composite powders were reported in recent years. Lin [15] prepared ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ rod-shaped ZrB2. As-prepared ZrB2-SiC composite powders were modified by Zhong [16] using in situ grown SiC nanowires with a diameter of 200 nm. However, studies on the preparation of ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ grown SiC whiskers have not been as widely reported.
SiC whiskers or nanowires were commonly prepared by molten-salt-assisted (using NaCl, KCl, or NaF) [17] or transition-metal-catalyzed (using ferrous, cobalt, or nickel) carbothermal reduction of silicon dioxide (SiO2) [18]. In this work, a simple molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed carbothermal reduction method was employed to synthesize ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ grown SiC whiskers using zircon, boron oxide, carbon black, ferrous powders, and NaCl as raw materials. Aiming to obtain SiC whiskers with ideal morphology (straight shape, small diameter, high aspect ratio, etc.) and clarify their in situ growth behavior in ZrB2-SiC composite powders, based on the thermodynamic calculations on the ZrO2-SiO2-B2O3-C-Fe system, the effects of heating temperature and ferrous catalyst amount on the phase and microstructure of as-prepared powders, especially on the morphology evolution of SiC whiskers were investigated. Further, growth mechanisms of in situ grown SiC whiskers were investigated. This work may serve as a theoretical basis for the preparation of anisotropic ZrB2-SiC composite powders.

2. Materials and Methods

Commercially available powders of zircon (ZrSiO4, 97.20%, ~14.3 μm, Chenyuan Powder, Zibo, Shandong, China), boron oxide (B2O3, 99.9999%, ~2.2 μm, Xingye Metal, Xingtai, Hebei, China), carbon black (C, 99.50%, ~3.6 μm, Meidi Family, Shanghai, China), ferrous metal s (Fe, 99.9999%, ~0.2 μm, Chengxin Metal, Qinghe, Hebei, China), and NaCl (99.50%, ~3.6 μm, Guoyao Chemical, Shanghai, China) were used as raw materials to synthesize ZrB2-SiC composite powders according to the following reaction:
ZrSiO4 (s) + B2O3 (l) +7C (s) = ZrB2 (s) +SiC (s) +7CO (g)
Molar ratios of raw materials are listed in Table 1. Excess boron oxide and carbon black were employed with a molar ratio of 1:1.5:8.4 (ZrSiO4:B2O3:C). A small amount of NaCl was added with a molar ratio of 0.5:1 (NaCl:ZrSiO4). Samples with different ferrous catalyst amounts with molar ratios of 0:1, 0.1:1, 0.2:1, 0.3:1, and 0.4:1 (Fe:ZrSiO4) were designed, and the corresponding products were referred to as ZS0, ZS1, ZS2, ZS3, and ZS4.
After dry mixing for 2 h, the mixed powders were put into a corundum crucible and heated at temperatures ranging from 1573 to 1773 K for 3 h under flowing argon gas (99.999%, 0.5 L/min) in a box atmosphere furnace. The heating rate was 10 K/min. The as-prepared powders were washed repeatedly with hot distilled water to remove residual salt and dried at 383 K for 24 h.
Thermodynamic calculations on the ZrO2-SiO2-B2O3-C-Fe system were performed using the Enthalpy–Entropy–Heat Capacity (HSC) Chemistry 6.0 software. The phase composition was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Shimadzu XRD-7000, Kyoto, Japan) with Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) at a scan rate of 5° (2θ)/min. The relative contents of crystalline phase were calculated by HighScore Plus software. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6390A, Kyoto, Japan) along with X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were used to analyze the morphology of composite powders and assist in phase identification, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, Kyoto, Japan) along with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were used to analyze the morphology of SiC whiskers.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermodynamic Calculation

Thermodynamic calculation of the ZrO2-SiO2-B2O3-C-Fe system was performed to predict the reaction production at different temperatures. It is known that pure ZrSiO4 starts decomposing into monoclinic ZrO2 (m-ZrO2) and amorphous SiO2 at a temperature above 1725 K [19]; however, this temperature may be practically lower because of the existence of NaCl molten salt and liquid B2O3 and the formation of low-temperature eutectic melts from impurities of zircon [20].
Main possible reactions in this work and their Gibbs free energies ( Δ r G ) at a temperature range of 1000–2000 K are presented in Table 2. Standard Gibbs free energies (   Δ r G θ ) of Reactions (2)–(6) at different temperatures were calculated using the HSC Chemistry 6.0 software, and CO partial pressure ( p c o ) was estimated to be equal to standard atmospheric pressure (   p θ ) during the reaction process under flowing argon gas; thus, the corresponding Gibbs free energy ( Δ r G ) results were obtained, as shown in Figure 1. Setting the Gibbs free energy to be zero, it was calculated that Reactions (2)–(6) could occur at 1776, 1793, 1940, 1503, and 1588 K, respectively, leading to the appearance of new phases ZrB2, SiC, ZrC, Fe2B, and FeB, respectively.
ZrO2 (s) + B2O3 (l) + 5C (s) = ZrB2 (s) + 5CO (g)
SiO2 (s) + 3C (s) = SiC (s) + 2CO (g)
ZrO2 (s) + 3C (s) = ZrC (s) + 2CO (g)
4Fe (l)+B2O3 (l)+3C (s) = 2Fe2B (s)+3CO (g)
2Fe (l)+B2O3 (l)+3C (s) = 2FeB (s)+3CO (g)

3.2. Phase Composition Evolution of Composite Powders

To determine the lowest heating temperature needed to obtain phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders, the XRD patterns and the relative contents of crystalline phase of sample ZS2 heated at temperatures ranging from 1573 to 1773 K for 3 h were studied, as shown in Figure 2.
Diffraction peaks of ZrB2 and β-SiC were observed at 1573 K, while no diffraction peaks of ZrSiO4 were detected (Figure 2a), indicating that ZrB2 and β-SiC had begun to nucleate and grow before 1573 K through Reactions (2) and (3), which was much lower than the thermodynamic temperatures of 1776 and 1793 K as shown in Figure 1. When increasing the temperature from 1573 to 1723 K, ZrB2 content increased continuously from 16 to 72% (Figure 2b). The slope of the line for Reaction (2) was negative in Figure 1, so increasing the temperature was helpful in forming ZrB2. Meanwhile, β-SiC content changed little, indicating that formation process of β-SiC through Reaction (3) had completed at a temperature lower than 1573 K, which was 150 K lower than that of Zhang [17] via molten-salt-assisted carbothermal reduction with silica fume and phenolic resin as raw materials and close to that of Guo [21] via nickel-catalyzed carbothermal reduction of polycarbosilane (PCS). The relative contents of ZrB2 and β-SiC showed no obvious changes when further raising the temperature to 1773 K. The weight ratio of ZrB2 to β-SiC was 72:28 (Figure 2b), which was close to the theoretical value of 74:26 calculated based on Reaction (1), suggesting that phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders were synthesized at 1723 K. This temperature was 50 K lower than that in the traditional carbothermal reduction of zircon [9]. Therefore, the lowest heating temperature to obtain phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders was set as 1723 K.
Ferrous catalyst amount is another important factor influencing the phase composition of as-prepared composite powders. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns and the relative contents of crystalline phase of samples ZS0–ZS4 heated at 1723 K for 3 h. With increasing molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4, ZrB2 peaks were increasingly strong (Figure 3a), and its relative contents increased significantly (Figure 3b). However, the relative contents of β-SiC changed little (Figure 3b), indicating that the effects of ferrous catalyst on promoting formation of β-SiC as reported in previous work [22] were negligible at a temperature as high as 1723 K. Hence, phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders were synthesized when the molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 was 0.2:1, in which the weight ratio of ZrB2 to β-SiC was 72:28 (Figure 3b). Further increasing the molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4, ZrC peaks appeared (Figure 3a). Therefore, the optimum molar ratio of raw materials to synthesize phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders was 0.2:0.5:1:1.5:8.4 (Fe:NaCl:ZrSiO4:B2O3:C), i.e., sample ZS2.

3.3. Microstructure of ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders with In Situ Grown SiC Whiskers

The microstructure of sample ZS2 heated at 1723 K for 3 h was examined using SEM and EDS, as shown in Figure 4.
There are mainly three morphologies shown in Figure 4a, including whiskers with a mean diameter of 0.15 μm and aspect ratio of 70–120, tabular grains with a diameter of 4–5 μm, and nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 0.03 μm. The EDS spectra at point 001 showed the existence of elements Si and C (Figure 4b), and the EDS spectra at point 002 showed the existence of elements Zr and B (Figure 4c), so the whiskers were SiC and tabular grains were ZrB2, which was confirmed by EDS mapping of the Si element (Figure 4d) and Zr element (Figure 4e) as well. Meanwhile, it is shown in Figure 4d that the nanoparticles in Figure 4a were SiC. It was seen that SiC whiskers were homogeneously distributed in the final composite powders.
There were minor spectra of Fe element at typical point 001, but no spectra of B element were seen, confirming that Fe element existed as neither Fe2B nor FeB, i.e., Reactions (5) and (6) did not occur owing to some dynamical factors, although thermodynamic temperatures of Fe2B and FeB (1503 and 1588 K) were lower than that of SiC (1776 K). Neither Fe2B nor FeB was found in the ZrB2 whiskers prepared by Khanr [23] using ZrO2, H3BO3, C, NaCl, and catalyst Ni/Co/Fe as raw materials, which was consistent with the results of this work.
The growth direction and crystal structure of SiC whiskers were further investigated by TEM, HRTEM, and SAED, as seen in Figure 5. The single SiC whisker was smooth and straight with a diameter of about 0.15 μm (Figure 5a). The lattice space value was measured to be 0.25 nm (Figure 5b), which was in agreement with the plane distance of the (111) plane [24], the close-packed planes of β-SiC, and so it was concluded that the whiskers preferentially grew along the <111> direction. The SAED patterns confirmed that the SiC whisker was single crystalline β-SiC (3C-SiC).

3.4. Morphology Evolution of SiC Whiskers

The morphology of SiC whiskers plays an important role in toughening mechanisms, including crack bridging, crack deflection, and pullout effects [5,6,7], and thus the morphology evolution of SiC whiskers was studied by comparing the microstructures of samples at different heating temperatures and ferrous catalyst amounts, as shown in Figure 6. Table 3 lists the morphology parameters of SiC whiskers in the composite powders.
With increasing heating temperature from 1623 to 1723 K (Figure 6a,d) and increasing molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 from 0:1 to 0.2:1 (Figure 6b–d), the aspect ratio of SiC whiskers increased while the diameter changed little. Since the relative contents of β-SiC changed little according to XRD analysis in Figure 2; Figure 3, it was concluded that, in the processing conditions above, the dominant growth behavior of SiC whiskers was one-dimensional growth along <111> rather than nucleation. When the molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 increased to 0.3:1, the morphology of SiC whiskers changed from straight and fine to bent and coarse. The whiskers made contact with each other under too many catalyst droplets, hence they could not grow continuously and evenly. Furthermore, when the molar ratio rose to 0.4:1, only a few short rods remained and serious grain agglomeration occurred. Therefore, ideal morphology of SiC whiskers was obtained when the molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 was 0.2:1 and heating temperature was 1723 K, which were the optimum processing conditions for the synthesis of phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders as well.
Some main stepwise reactions in Reaction (3) are listed as follows [24,25,26]:
SiO2 (s) +C (s) = SiO (g) + CO (g)
SiO (g) + 3CO (g) = SiC (s) + 2CO2 (g)
SiO (g) + 2C (s) = SiC (s) + CO (g)
C (s) + O2 (g) = 2CO (g)
Reaction (8) is the main reaction for nucleation of SiC whiskers, while Reaction (9) is the main reaction for nucleation of SiC particles. The morphology of SiC whiskers was determined by two important processes: (1) When the concentrations of SiO and CO released from Reactions (7) and (10) reached an appropriate range, SiC began to nucleate as a stable phase to reduce the system energy [27,28]. Reaction (10) occurred at a relatively higher temperature than Reaction (7) [26]. (2) With the continual provision of SiO gas and CO gas, SiC whiskers grew longer through Reaction (8) along a certain direction due to the lowest surface energy of β-SiC. It was concluded that high reaction rates of Reactions (7) and (8) were essential to obtain SiC whiskers with high aspect ratio.
The reactivity of SiO2, C, SiO gas, and CO gas were proportional to the reaction rate of Reactions (7) and (8). Based on the first-principles calculations, Wang [22] reported that the bond length in Si-O at the (101) plane of SiO2 became longer after adsorption of ferrous nanoparticles, indicating that iron could catalyze Reaction (7) by increasing the reactivity of SiO2. Wang [29] reported that the large distortion and strong interaction of nickel nanoparticles with C, SiO gas, and CO gas could promote their dissociation of atomic bonds, further making them more reactive. This conclusion could also explain the catalytic effects of ferrous powders in this work. Hence, the reaction rates of Reactions (7) and (8) were both promoted by the ferrous catalyst. A greater ferrous catalyst amount provided more active sites. The negative slope of Reaction (3) in Figure 1 also meant that increasing heating temperature effectively improved the reaction rate. That is why the aspect ratio of SiC whiskers increased with increasing ferrous catalyst amount and heating temperature, as shown in Figure 6a–d. In addition, the reaction rate of Reaction (9) was also promoted by ferrous catalyst.
The formation process of β-SiC through Reaction (3) was completed at 1573 K for sample Z2, as shown in Figure 2, which was due to the combined effects of the ferrous catalyst and NaCl molten salt [30], as well as high activity of amorphous SiO2 decomposed from ZrSiO4. For Reactions (2) and (4), increasing the ferrous catalyst amount was helpful in dissociating atomic bonds in carbon black and the further accelerating formation of ZrB2 and ZrC, as shown in Figure 3.

3.5. Growth Mechanisms of SiC Whiskers in ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders

The vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) mechanism was usually employed to explain the synthesis process of SiC whiskers with the addition of transition-metal catalysts [31,32]. The SiO gas and CO gas were absorbed into the catalyst droplet, and then SiC nucleated and grew along a direction on the interface between the nucleus and droplet. Lastly the catalyst droplets were left on the top of whiskers. However, there were no droplets found at the tips of whiskers in this work, suggesting that VLS growth mechanisms were not suitable to explain their growth behavior. Based on the XRD, SEM, EDS, TEM, HRTEM, and SAED analysis in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, a molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed vapor–solid (VS) mechanism is promoted in Figure 7 and described in detail as follows:
(1)
Preparation stage. At a low temperature, B2O3 and NaCl melted. They accelerated the decomposition of ZrSiO4 into m-ZrO2 and amorphous SiO2 by promoting the mass transfer of raw materials.
(2)
Nucleation stage. Ferrous particles catalyzed Reactions (7) and (8) by increasing the reactivity of SiO2, C, SiO gas, and CO gas, resulting in the nucleation of SiC whiskers at a certain temperature lower than 1573 K. Meanwhile, carbon black with high reactivity was beneficial to the nucleation of ZrB2 grains through Reaction (2). The effect of NaCl molten salt was not evident here because the temperature approached its boiling point.
(3)
Growth stage. SiC whiskers grew along <111> on the solid surface of the SiC nucleus through Reaction (8) on the condition of appropriate heating temperature and ferrous catalyst amount. Some SiC nuclei which nucleated on the carbon black particles through Reaction (9) were more likely to grow into SiC nanoparticles. ZrB2 tabular grains continued to nucleate and grow.

4. Conclusions

Phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders with in situ grown SiC whiskers were successfully synthesized by molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed carbothermal reduction, which has great potential application in improving the fracture toughness of ZrB2-SiC composite ceramics. The in situ growth behavior of SiC whiskers was studied. Conclusions are summarized as follows:
(1)
Phase-pure ZrB2-SiC composite powders were obtained when the molten ratio of raw materials was 0.2:0.5:1:1.5:8.4 (Fe:NaCl:ZrSiO4:B2O3:C) and the heating temperature was 1723 K, in which β-SiC whiskers were single crystalline with a mean diameter of 0.15 μm and aspect ratio of 70–120.
(2)
Heating temperature and ferrous catalyst amount obviously influenced the phase composition and microstructure of ZrB2-SiC composite powders, especially for the morphology of SiC whiskers. With increasing heating temperature (1523–1723 K) and molar ratio of Fe to ZrSiO4 (0:1 to 0.2:1), the aspect ratio of SiC whiskers increased significantly while the relative content of SiC phase changed little, and the relative content of ZrB2 phase increased continuously. Excess ferrous catalysts resulted in the formation of ZrC phase and serious grain agglomeration at 1723 K.
(3)
Molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed vapor–solid mechanism was promoted for the growth mechanism of in situ grown SiC whiskers in ZrB2-SiC composite powders. Ferrous catalysts played a major role in increasing the reactivity of SiO2, C, SiO gas, and CO gas, further realized by the low temperature nucleation and high aspect ratio of SiC whiskers.
Excess carbon black in the ZrB2-SiC composite powders prepared by molten-salt-assisted iron-catalyzed carbothermal reduction method was difficult to remove, which calls for further studies to increase the purity of composite powders. The later work should focus on the following two points:
(1)
Growth behavior of ZrB2-SiC composite powders with different molar ratios of ZrO2 to SiO2;
(2)
Evaluation of toughening effects of in situ grown SiC whiskers on ZrB2-SiC composite ceramics, as well as the corresponding toughening mechanisms.

Author Contributions

All authors discussed and agreed upon the idea and made scientific contributions: writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; experiment design, X.L. and X.W.; experiment performance, X.L. and X.H.; data analysis, X.L. and L.D.; writing—review and editing, X.H. and L.D.; methodology and resources, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province for Youth (No. 2017JQ5100) and the Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Education Department (No. 18JK0498).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fahrenholtz, W.G.; Hilmas, G.E.; Talmy, I.G.; Zaykoski, J.A. Refractory diborides of zirconium and hafnium. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 90, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fahrenholtz, W.G.; Hilmas, G.E. Ultra-high temperature ceramics: Materials for extreme environments. Scr. Mater. 2017, 129, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Squire, T.H.; Marschall, J. Material property requirements for analysis and design of UHTC components in hypersonic applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 3, 2239–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, S.Q. Densification of ZrB2-based composites and their mechanical and physical properties: A review. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silvestroni, L.; Sciti, D.; Melandri, C.; Guicciardi, S. Toughened ZrB2-based ceramics through SiC whisker or SiC chopped fiber additions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2155–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sciti, D.; Silvestroni, L. Processing, sintering and oxidation behavior of SiC fibers reinforced ZrB2 composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 1933–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bai, Y.H.; Sun, M.Y.; Li, M.X.; Fan, S.W.; Cheng, L.F. Improved fracture toughness of laminated ZrB2-SiC-MoSi2 ceramics using SiC whisker. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 8890–8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zimmermann, J.W.; Hilmas, G.E.; Fahrenholtz, W.G.; Monteverde, F.; Bellosi, A. Fabrication and properties of reactively hot pressed ZrB2–SiC ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 2729–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, S.; Cao, Y.N.; Zhang, Z.C.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, F.L.; Liu, L.L.; Zhang, S.W. Preparation of ZrB2–SiC composite powders by carbothermal reduction of ZrSiO4. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 42, 779–784. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xie, B.Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Gong, H.Y.; Zhang, W.M. Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC powders in one-step reduction process. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 19522–19525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, F.L.; Tan, C.; Liu, J.H.; Wang, J.K.; Jia, Q.L.; Zhang, H.J. Low temperature synthesis of ZrB2-SiC powders by molten salt magnesiothermic reduction and their oxidation resistance. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 9611–9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cao, Y.N.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, F.L.; Lu, L.L.; Zhang, S.W. Preparation and characterization of ultrafine ZrB2–SiC composite powders by a combined sol–gel and microwave boro-carbothermal reduction method. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 7823–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, J.B.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.G.; Fang, J.Y.; An, L.A. Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC nano-composite powder via polymeric precursor route. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ryu, H.Y.; Nersisyan, H.H.; Lee, J.H. Preparation of zirconium-based ceramic and composite fine-grained powders. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2012, 30, 33–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, Y.H.; Liu, J.H.; Song, S.L.; Liu, J.B.; Bashir, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhen, Q. Microstructure evolution and growth behavior of rod-shaped ZrB2 in situ preparation of ZrB2-SiC composite powders. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 4016–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhong, Z.X.; Yan, L.W.; Liu, L.; Xu, B.S. Fabrication of modified ultrahigh-temperature ceramic hybrid powders using in situ grown SiC nanowires. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 3462–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Jia, Q.L.; Lin, L.X.; Huang, J.T.; Zhang, S.W. Molten salt assisted synthesis of 3C–SiC nanowire and its photoluminescence properties. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 12614–12620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prakash, J.; Venugopalan, R.; Tripathi, B.M.; Ghosh, S.K.; Chakravartty, J.K.; Tyagi, A.K. Chemistry of one dimensional silicon carbide materials: Principle, production, application and future prospects. Prog. Solid State Chem. 2015, 43, 98–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kaiser, A.; Lobert, M.; Telle, R. Thermal stability of zircon (ZrSiO4). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 2199–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krishnarao, R.V. Preparation of ZrB2 and ZrB2-SiC powders in a single step reduction of zircon (ZrSiO4) with B4C. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, C.C.; Cheng, L.F.; Ye, F.; Li, Z.C.; Xu, Z.S. Synthesis and characterization of carbon-poor SiC nanowires via vapor-liquid-solid growth mechanism. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 6440–6446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.K.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Li, S.S.; Ge, S.T.; Song, J.B.; Zhang, H.I. Catalytic carbothermal reduction synthesis and mechanism of 3C-SiC from diatomite with Fe as catalyst. Chin. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 32, 767–774. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khanr, A.K.; Pathak, L.C.; Godkhindi, M.M. Carbothermal synthesis of zirconium diboride(ZrB2) whiskers. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2007, 37, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.G.; Huang, S.; Liu, S.; Qing, Z. EBSD characterization of the growth mechanism of SiC synthesized via direct microwave heating. Mater. Charact. 2016, 114, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, P.; Pan, R.Q.; Dong, S.; Jin, K.F.; Zhang, X.H. Several millimeters long SiC–SiOx nanowires synthesized by carbon black and silica sol. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 3625–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.Q.; Zhang, L.Y.; Li, X.; Chang, X.J.; Wu, Y.T.; Wang, X.F. Synthesis, characterization, and ceramization of a carbon-rich SiCw-ZrC-ZrB2 preceramic polymer precursor. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 16097–16104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, P.; Dong, S.; Zhang, D.Y.; Fang, C.; Zhang, X.H. Catalyst-assisted synthesis of core–shell SiC/SiO2 nanowires via a simple method. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 1581–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, D.; Xue, C.; Bai, H.; Jiang, N. Silicon carbide nanowires grown on graphene sheets. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 5473–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, H.F.; Li, H.S.; Zhang, H.J.; Bi, Y.; Liu, J.H.; Zhang, S.W. Nickel-catalyzed preparation of self-bonded SiC refractories with improved microstructure and properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 5219–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, Y.B.; Park, T.J.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, H.J.; Wong, S.S. Environmentally friendly methodologies of nanostructure synthesis. Small 2007, 7, 1122–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urretavizcaya, G.; López, P.J.M. Growth of SiC whiskers by VLS process. J. Mater. Res. 1994, 9, 2981–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Zhang, G.Q.; Tronstad, R.; Ostrovskic, O. Synthesis of SiC whiskers by VLS and VS process. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 5668–5676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Gibbs free energies ( Δ r G ) of Reactions (2)–(6) at different temperatures.
Figure 1. Gibbs free energies ( Δ r G ) of Reactions (2)–(6) at different temperatures.
Materials 13 03502 g001
Figure 2. Phase composition of sample ZS2 heated at 1573–1773 K for 3 h, n(Fe):n(NaCl):n(ZrSiO4):n(B2O3):n(C) = 0.2:0.5:1:1.5:8.4. (a) XRD patterns; (b) relative contents of the crystalline phase.
Figure 2. Phase composition of sample ZS2 heated at 1573–1773 K for 3 h, n(Fe):n(NaCl):n(ZrSiO4):n(B2O3):n(C) = 0.2:0.5:1:1.5:8.4. (a) XRD patterns; (b) relative contents of the crystalline phase.
Materials 13 03502 g002
Figure 3. Phase composition of samples ZS0–ZS4 heated at 1723 K for 3 h, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0:1, 0.1:1, 0.2:1, 0.3:1, and 0.4:1, respectively: (a) XRD patterns; (b) relative contents of the crystalline phase.
Figure 3. Phase composition of samples ZS0–ZS4 heated at 1723 K for 3 h, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0:1, 0.1:1, 0.2:1, 0.3:1, and 0.4:1, respectively: (a) XRD patterns; (b) relative contents of the crystalline phase.
Materials 13 03502 g003
Figure 4. Microstructure of sample ZS2 heated at 1723 K for 3 h: (a) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image; (b) energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra at point 001; (c) EDS spectra at point 002; (d) EDS mapping of Si element; (e) EDS mapping of Zr element.
Figure 4. Microstructure of sample ZS2 heated at 1723 K for 3 h: (a) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image; (b) energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra at point 001; (c) EDS spectra at point 002; (d) EDS mapping of Si element; (e) EDS mapping of Zr element.
Materials 13 03502 g004
Figure 5. Microstructure of a single SiC whisker in sample ZS2: (a) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image; (b) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM image); (c) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image.
Figure 5. Microstructure of a single SiC whisker in sample ZS2: (a) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image; (b) high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM image); (c) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image.
Materials 13 03502 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of samples at different processing conditions: (a) 1623 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.2:1; (b) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0:1; (c) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.1:1; (d) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.2:1; (e) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.3:1; (f) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.4:1.
Figure 6. SEM images of samples at different processing conditions: (a) 1623 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.2:1; (b) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0:1; (c) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.1:1; (d) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.2:1; (e) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.3:1; (f) 1723 K, n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4) = 0.4:1.
Materials 13 03502 g006
Figure 7. Illustrations of the possible growth process of SiC whiskers in the synthesis of ZrB2-SiC composite powders.
Figure 7. Illustrations of the possible growth process of SiC whiskers in the synthesis of ZrB2-SiC composite powders.
Materials 13 03502 g007
Table 1. Molar ratios of raw materials.
Table 1. Molar ratios of raw materials.
Sample No.Molar Ratios of Raw Materials
ZrSiO4B2O3CFeNaCl
ZS011.58.400.5
ZS111.58.40.10.5
ZS211.58.40.20.5
ZS311.58.40.30.5
ZS411.58.40.40.5
Table 2. Main possible reactions and their Gibbs free energies ( Δ r G ).
Table 2. Main possible reactions and their Gibbs free energies ( Δ r G ).
Reactions Δ r G   /KJ·mol−1
(2) Δ r G 2 = Δ r G 2 θ + 5 R T ln p c o p θ   ( Δ r G 2 θ = 170 ~ 621 )
(3) Δ r G 3 = Δ r G 3 θ + 2 R T ln p c o p θ   ( Δ r G 3 θ = 67 ~ 266 )
(4) Δ r G 4 = Δ r G 4 θ + 2 R T ln p c o p θ   ( Δ r G 4 θ = 19 ~ 322 )
(5) Δ r G 5 = Δ r G 5 θ + 3 R T ln p c o p θ   ( Δ r G 5 θ = 191 ~ 207 )
(6) Δ r G 6 = Δ r G 6 θ + 3 R T ln p c o p θ   ( Δ r G 6 θ = 180 ~ 264 )
Table 3. Morphology parameters of SiC whiskers in samples as shown in Figure 6.
Table 3. Morphology parameters of SiC whiskers in samples as shown in Figure 6.
Sample No.n(Fe):n(ZrSiO4)Temperature/KMorphology Parameters
ShapeMean Diameter/μmAspect Ratio
Z20.2:11623 Kstraight whisker0.1520–40
Z00:11723 Kstraight whisker0.1–0.320–40
Z10.1:11723 Kstraight whisker0.1540–50
Z20.2:11723 Kstraight whisker0.1570–120
Z30.3:11723 Kbent whisker0.35–10
Z40.4:11723 Kshort rod0.3<5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lian, X.; Hua, X.; Wang, X.; Deng, L. In Situ Growth Behavior of SiC Whiskers with High Aspect Ratio in the Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders. Materials 2020, 13, 3502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163502

AMA Style

Lian X, Hua X, Wang X, Deng L. In Situ Growth Behavior of SiC Whiskers with High Aspect Ratio in the Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders. Materials. 2020; 13(16):3502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lian, Xiaoqing, Xiaohu Hua, Xiaogang Wang, and Lirong Deng. 2020. "In Situ Growth Behavior of SiC Whiskers with High Aspect Ratio in the Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC Composite Powders" Materials 13, no. 16: 3502. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop