Next Article in Journal
The Use of the Acoustic Emission Method to Identify Crack Growth in 40CrMo Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Variational and Deep Learning Segmentation of Very-Low-Contrast X-ray Computed Tomography Images of Carbon/Epoxy Woven Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Concrete Columns Reinforced with New Developed High-Strength Steel under Eccentric Loading
Previous Article in Special Issue
X-ray Computed Tomography for Characterization of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam
Open AccessArticle

Quantification of Uncertainty and Best Practice in Computing Interfacial Curvature from Complex Pore Space Images

Department of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(13), 2138; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12132138
Received: 11 June 2019 / Revised: 24 June 2019 / Accepted: 25 June 2019 / Published: 3 July 2019
Recent advances in high-resolution three-dimensional X-ray CT imaging have made it possible to visualize fluid configurations during multiphase displacement at the pore-scale. However, there is an inherited difficulty in image-based curvature measurements: the use of voxelized image data may introduce significant error, which has not—to date—been quantified. To find the best method to compute curvature from micro-CT images and quantify the likely error, we performed drainage and imbibition direct numerical simulations for an oil/water system on a bead pack and a Bentheimer sandstone. From the simulations, local fluid configurations and fluid pressures were obtained. We then investigated methods to compute curvature on the oil/water interface. The interface was defined in two ways; in one case the simulated interface with a sub-resolution smoothness was used, while the other was a smoothed interface extracted from synthetic segmented data based on the simulated phase distribution. The curvature computed on these surfaces was compared with that obtained from the simulated capillary pressure, which does not depend on the explicit consideration of the shape of the interface. As distinguished from previous studies which compared an average or peak curvature with the value derived from the measured macroscopic capillary pressure, our approach can also be used to study the pore-by-pore variation. This paper suggests the best method to compute curvature on images with a quantification of likely errors: local capillary pressures for each pore can be estimated to within 30% if the average radius of curvature is more than 6 times the image resolution, while the average capillary pressure can also be estimated to within 11% if the average radius of curvature is more than 10 times the image resolution. View Full-Text
Keywords: pore-scale imaging; multiphase flow; capillary pressure; interfacial curvature; direct numerical simulation pore-scale imaging; multiphase flow; capillary pressure; interfacial curvature; direct numerical simulation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Akai, T.; Lin, Q.; Alhosani, A.; Bijeljic, B.; Blunt, M.J. Quantification of Uncertainty and Best Practice in Computing Interfacial Curvature from Complex Pore Space Images. Materials 2019, 12, 2138.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop