Next Article in Journal
Regulating AI in the Energy Sector: A Scoping Review of EU Laws, Challenges, and Global Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Evaporative Condensation Air-Conditioning Unit with Microchannel Heat Exchanger: An Experimental Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Simulation Study of Gas–Water Adsorption Behavior and Mobility Evaluation in Ultra-Deep, High-Pressure Fractured Tight Sandstone Reservoirs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development

Faculty of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
Energies 2025, 18(9), 2357; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092357
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 30 April 2025 / Published: 6 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development)

Abstract

:
The development of geo-energy resources, including oil, gas, and geothermal reservoirs, is being transformed through the creation of low-energy processes and innovative technologies. This Special Issue compiles cutting-edge research aimed at enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and recovery during geo-energy extraction. The published studies explore a diverse range of methodologies, such as the nanofluidic analysis of shale oil phase transitions, deep electrical resistivity tomography for geothermal exploration, and hybrid AI-driven production prediction models. Their key themes include hydraulic fracturing optimization, CO2 injection dynamics, geothermal reservoir simulation, and competitive gas–water adsorption in ultra-deep reservoirs, and these studies combine advanced numerical modeling, experimental techniques, and field applications to address challenges in unconventional reservoirs, geothermal energy exploitation, and enhanced oil recovery. By bridging theoretical insights with practical engineering solutions, this Special Issue provides a comprehensive foundation for future innovations in low-energy geo-energy development.

1. Introduction

Geo-energy resources, which include conventional fossil fuels (e.g., oil and natural gas) and unconventional resources (e.g., geothermal, shale gas, and tight oil), remain indispensable to global energy systems [1,2,3]. These resources are broadly classified as either extractive (hydrocarbons) and renewable (geothermal) [4,5,6], with each playing a critical role in meeting energy demands and balancing environmental sustainability [7,8]. With industrialization and economic recovery driving energy consumption, optimizing the extraction and utilization of these resources through low-energy technologies has become a pivotal focus of current research [9,10,11].
In conventional hydrocarbon development, advancements in drilling, completion, and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies have significantly improved the efficiency of these processes and reduced their energy intensity [12,13,14]. Innovations such as intelligent well systems, high-performance fracturing fluids, and CO2 injection techniques are reshaping the stimulation and production of reservoirs [15,16]. For instance, polymer flooding and steam-assisted methods are now being adapted to unconventional reservoirs in order to address challenges like low permeability and reservoir heterogeneity [17,18]. Meanwhile, numerical modeling [19,20,21] and big data analytics [22,23,24] are enabling precise reservoir management, minimizing the energy wasted during extraction.
The exploitation of unconventional geo-energy resources, such as geothermal and shale gas, demands even greater innovation [25,26]. Geothermal systems, vital for achieving carbon neutrality, require better heat extraction methods, including better approaches to reservoir fracturing and advanced well designs [8]. Similarly, shale gas and tight oil reservoirs benefit from low-energy hydraulic fracturing, gas–water flow optimization, and the in situ upgrading of their technology [27,28]. Emerging approaches like electromagnetic heating and solar–thermal integration further underscore the shift toward sustainable extraction [29,30,31].
This collection, which is in conversation with the Special Issue of Energies, places an emphasis on fundamental innovations and has compiled 10 new publications on the original application of new ideas and on methodologies that will lead to new advances in low-energy processes for geo-energy development.

2. Review of the Research Presented in This Special Issue

The papers featured in this Special Issue showcase state-of-the-art advancements in low-energy technologies used for geo-energy development. These innovations span three critical areas: unconventional hydrocarbon recovery, geothermal resource exploitation, and intelligent simulation techniques that enhance oil and gas production while minimizing energy consumption.

2.1. Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development Using Low-Energy Technologies

Unconventional reservoirs, such as shale reservoirs and tight formations, require innovative approaches to minimize energy consumption while maximizing recovery. Several studies in this Special Issue address critical challenges in hydraulic fracturing, phase behavior, and gas–water interactions. To study the behavior of fluids in shale oil reservoirs at the nanoscale, Lu et al. [32] investigated wax precipitation dynamics in shale oil reservoirs during hydraulic fracturing. Their nanofluidic experiments revealed that the fracturing fluid alters phase transitions, with wax accumulating in microcracks and reducing gas mobility. This insight helps optimize the design of fracturing fluids to mitigate formation damage. Meanwhile, Hu et al. [33] advanced our understanding of CO2 injection dynamics by visualizing nanoscale salt precipitation in shale pores, which revealed dissolution rates slower than classical theory predicts—a critical insight for mitigating formation damage in CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects.
Jia et al. [34] developed a semi-analytical model of the gas–water flow in hydraulically fractured shale that incorporates water invasion effects. Their findings suggest that residual fracturing fluids hinder gas production, highlighting the need for improved flowback strategies. Liu et al. [35] used molecular dynamics to study CH4 and H2O interactions in ultra-deep tight sandstone. Their results show that water adsorption significantly restricts the flow of gas, particularly at high water saturations, providing guidance for production optimization in water-bearing formations.

2.2. Geothermal Resource Exploitation Using Low-Energy Technologies

Efficient geothermal energy extraction requires advanced reservoir characterization and stimulation techniques and optimized heat extraction methods. This Special Issue highlights innovative approaches to improving single-well heating efficiency and the performance of enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs). Sáez Blázquez et al. [36] demonstrated the effectiveness of geoelectrical methods in identifying medium-to-low-enthalpy geothermal resources. Their 2D/3D subsurface models revealed fractured carbonate formations with high geothermal potential, significantly reducing the uncertainty of exploration. Zhu et al. [37] conducted simulations using the TOUGH2-BIOT program to analyze EGS reservoir stimulation and compare heat extraction methods. Their results show that horizontal wells achieve higher heat recovery ratios than traditional double-well systems and double-pipe heat exchange configurations, providing a more sustainable solution for long-term geothermal exploitation. Feng et al. [38] evaluated a closed-loop single-well system in Northeast China. By optimizing key injection parameters, they maximized the system’s heat extraction efficiency. Their simulations confirmed the system’s viability for district heating applications in low-temperature environments. Additionally, TOUGHREACT modeling revealed that reducing the injection flow rate, injection temperature, and Mg2+/K+ concentrations in the injected water can suppress secondary mineral formation and delay near-well reservoir clogging, further improving the system’s longevity [39].

2.3. Intelligent Technologies and Numerical Simulation Innovations for Low-Energy Oil and Gas Development

Artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced numerical modeling are revolutionizing low-energy geo-energy development by enabling more efficient and accurate optimization strategies. Kong et al. [40] developed a hybrid two-stage decomposition–LSTM model for oil production forecasting in complex volcanic reservoirs. Their approach significantly outperforms conventional methods, delivering higher-precision predictions to support data-driven reservoir management. When applied to the Jinlong oilfield, optimized injection–production parameters reduced inefficient fluid cycling, enhancing the efficiency of oil recovery. Liu et al. [41] addressed the challenge of limited early-time pressure data in tight reservoirs by developing a physics-constrained workflow that enhances permeability and skin factor estimation, thereby improving the characterization of tight oil reservoirs. Together, these AI-driven and modeling innovations demonstrate the transformative potential of integrating cutting-edge computational approaches into geo-energy engineering.

3. Conclusions

Many academics from a variety of fields, from natural sciences to engineering, have been researching the recovery of unconventional hydrocarbons, geothermal energy exploitation, and intelligent simulation techniques. New theories and technology are presented in this Special Issue. These new experimental methods, numerical simulation technology, and pilot cases can help readers better understand and be inspired by the cutting-edge technologies being used in the field of low-energy geo-energy development.

Acknowledgments

I sincerely appreciate the invaluable guidance and support provided by the editorial team throughout this process. I would also like to extend my deepest gratitude to the contributing academic editors for their expertise and dedication. Finally, I wish to thank the authors for their outstanding contributions and the anonymous reviewers for their rigorous evaluations and insightful feedback, which were instrumental in shaping this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wan, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhou, C.; Liu, L. Multiphysics coupling in exploitation and utilization of geo-energy: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2023, 10, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Unconventional resources: Provenance analysis, sediment transport, reservoir evaluation, geo-energy. Front. Earth Sci. 2024, 12, 1530200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, J.; Xie, H.-P.; Matthai, S.K.; Hu, J.-J.; Li, C.-B. The role of natural fracture activation in hydraulic fracturing for deep unconventional geo-energy reservoir stimulation. Pet. Sci. 2023, 20, 2141–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, M.; Yuan, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Guo, W. Dynamic prediction of fracture propagation in horizontal well hydraulic fracturing: A data-driven approach for geo-energy exploitation. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 241, 213182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khaleghi, K.; Livescu, S. A review of vertical closed-loop geothermal heating and cooling systems with an Emphasis on the importance of the subsurface. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2023, 220, 111137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Darko, C.K.; Liu, Y.; Wei, M.; Bai, B.; Schuman, T. Enhancing geothermal efficiency: Experimental evaluation of a high-temperature preformed particle gel for controlling preferential fluid flow. Renew. Energy 2024, 235, 121417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Winterfeld, P.; Bai, B.; Wu, Y.-S. Using Preformed Particle Gels to Control Transport in Geothermal Reservoirs: Mathematical Modeling. In Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Galveston, TX, USA, 25–27 March 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.-B.; Qin, H.; Wang, Y.-L.; Hu, J.-Q.; Sun, D.-L.; Yu, B. Experimental study of the temporary plugging capability of diverters to block hydraulic fractures in high-temperature geothermal reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 2023, 20, 3687–3699. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fassihi, M.R.; Kovscek, A.R. Low-Energy Processes for Unconventional Oil Recovery; Society of Petroleum Engineers: Richardson, TX, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xiong, R.; Guo, J.; Kiyingi, W.; Gao, C.; Wang, L.; Luo, J.; Song, H.; Wang, X. Technical transformation of heavy/ultra-heavy oil production in China driven by low carbon goals: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 458, 142531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Lin, H.; Li, S.; Yang, E.; Ding, Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, Y. Accurate gas extraction (AGE) under the dual-carbon background: Green low-carbon development pathway and prospect. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 377, 134372. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, D.-Y.; Fang, X.-Y.; Sun, R.-X.; Xu, Z.-H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.-Y. Development of degradable pre-formed particle gel (DPPG) as temporary plugging agent for petroleum drilling and production. Pet. Sci. 2021, 18, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, D.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, P.; Lu, J.; Yang, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, T. Laboratory Evaluation of Antileakage Performance against CO2 of Alkali-Activated Gel-Reinforced Cement for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage. SPE J. 2025, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, D.; Qin, J.; Gao, Y.; Guo, S.; Bai, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, H. Black Nanosheet-Enhanced Low-Salinity Water System for Improving Oil Recovery in a Low-Permeability Conglomerate Reservoir. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 11893–11901. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bai, L.; Shi, C.; Tang, K.; Xie, H.; Yang, S.; Zhu, D. Study on migration and plugging performance of polymer gel in fractured cores using nuclear magnetic resonance technology. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 227, 211891. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shah, M.S.; Shah, S.N. Comparative assessment of mechanical and chemical fluid diversion techniques during hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells. Pet. Sci. 2023, 20, 3582–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seright, R. Potential for polymer flooding reservoirs with viscous oils. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2010, 13, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, D.; Bai, B.; Hou, J. Polymer gel systems for water management in high-temperature petroleum reservoirs: A chemical review. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 13063–13087. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Y.-Z.; Cao, R.-Y.; Jia, Z.-H.; Wang, B.-Y.; Ma, M.; Cheng, L.-S. A multi-mechanism numerical simulation model for CO2-EOR and storage in fractured shale oil reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 1814–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, G.-C.; Sheng, K.-M.; He, Y.-B.; Yang, L.-L.; Dong, T.-F.; Sun, Z.; Jiang, K.-L. Numerical simulation of the temporal and spatial evolution of sandstone pore type reservoir damage types and severity. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 25401. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cai, J.; Qin, X.; Xia, X.; Jiao, X.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Xia, Y. Numerical modeling of multiphase flow in porous media considering micro-and nanoscale effects: A comprehensive review. Gas Sci. Eng. 2024, 131, 205441. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiao, Y.; Ji, J.; Yang, Y.; Yin, H. Big data and artificial intelligence-based numerical simulation and optimization of microbial enhanced oil recovery: Model development, algorithm application, and prospects. Adv. Resour. Res. 2025, 5, 551–568. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawal, A.; Yang, Y.; He, H.; Baisa, N.L. Machine learning in oil and gas exploration: A review. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 19035–19058. [Google Scholar]
  24. Favour, D.A. Petroleum Industry Value Chain Optimization: The Inevitability of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science in Midstream and Downstream Development. In Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, 5–7 August 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, G.; Song, X.; Shi, Y.; Wang, G.; Huang, Z. Current status and construction scheme of smart geothermal field technology. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2024, 51, 1035–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xue, L.; Xu, S.; Nie, J.; Qin, J.; Han, J.-X.; Liu, Y.-T.; Liao, Q.-Z. An efficient data-driven global sensitivity analysis method of shale gas production through convolutional neural network. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 2475–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lobo, F.L.; Wang, H.; Huggins, T.; Rosenblum, J.; Linden, K.G.; Ren, Z.J. Low-energy hydraulic fracturing wastewater treatment via AC powered electrocoagulation with biochar. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 309, 180–184. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, Z.; Wang, H. Feasibility study of energy storage using hydraulic fracturing in shale formations. Appl. Energy 2024, 354, 122251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liao, Q.; Wang, B.; Chen, X.; Tan, P. Reservoir stimulation for unconventional oil and gas resources: Recent advances and future perspectives. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2024, 13, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bera, A.; Babadagli, T. Status of electromagnetic heating for enhanced heavy oil/bitumen recovery and future prospects: A review. Appl. Energy 2015, 151, 206–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, B.; Ma, T.; Guo, C. Modeling microwave heating for enhanced shale gas recovery: Fully coupled two-phase flows with heat transfer and electromagnetism in deformable reservoirs. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2024, 248, 123190. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lu, Z.; Wan, Y.; Xu, L.; Fang, D.; Wu, H.; Zhong, J. Nanofluidic Study of Multiscale Phase Transitions and Wax Precipitation in Shale Oil Reservoirs. Energies 2024, 17, 2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiong, H.; Wang, Z.; Duan, H.; Yao, J.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L.; Song, W.; et al. Direct Visualization of Nanoscale Salt Precipitation and Dissolution Dynamics during CO2 Injection. Energies 2022, 15, 9567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, P.; Niu, L.; Li, Y.; Feng, H. A Practical Model for Gas–Water Two-Phase Flow and Fracture Parameter Estimation in Shale. Energies 2023, 16, 5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Y.; Pei, X.; Yang, F.; Zhong, J.; Dai, L.; Wang, C.; Zhou, T.; Li, Y.; Xiao, S. Molecular Simulation Study of Gas–Water Adsorption Behavior and Mobility Evaluation in Ultra-Deep, High-Pressure Fractured Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. Energies 2025, 18, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sáez Blázquez, C.; Martín Nieto, I.; Carrasco, J.; Carrasco, P.; Porras, D.; Maté-González, M.Á.; Farfán Martín, A.; González-Aguilera, D. Applying Deep Electrical-Resistivity Tomography Techniques for the Exploration of Medium- and Low-Geothermal Energy Resources. Energies 2024, 17, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, J.; Cui, Z.; Feng, B.; Ren, H.; Liu, X. Numerical Simulation of Geothermal Reservoir Reconstruction and Heat Extraction System Productivity Evaluation. Energies 2023, 16, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Feng, B.; Ren, H.; Yang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Zhao, J. Comparative Analysis of Heating Efficiency of a Single-Well Geothermal System in the Cold Region of Northeast China. Energies 2023, 16, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, B.; Cui, Z.; Liu, X.; Shangguan, S.; Qi, X.; Li, S. Effects of Water–Rock Interaction on the Permeability of the Near-Well Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System. Energies 2022, 15, 8820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kong, X.; Liu, Y.; Xue, L.; Li, G.; Zhu, D. A Hybrid Oil Production Prediction Model Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. Energies 2023, 16, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, T.; Jiang, L.; Liu, J.; Ni, J.; Liu, X.; Diwu, P. A Novel Workflow for Early Time Transient Pressure Data Interpretation in Tight Oil Reservoirs with Physical Constraints. Energies 2023, 16, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, D. New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development. Energies 2025, 18, 2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092357

AMA Style

Zhu D. New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development. Energies. 2025; 18(9):2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Daoyi. 2025. "New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development" Energies 18, no. 9: 2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092357

APA Style

Zhu, D. (2025). New Advances in Low-Energy Processes for Geo-Energy Development. Energies, 18(9), 2357. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop