Next Article in Journal
Low-Cost Maximum Power Point Tracking Strategy and Protection Circuit Applied to an Ayanz Wind Turbine with Screw Blades
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Grid Unbalances on Electric Vehicle Chargers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/en16176199
Review Report
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

NVH Analysis and Optimization of Construction Hoist Drive System

Energies 2023, 16(17), 6199; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176199
by Bo Huang *, Bangyu Tan, Jian Wang, Kang Liu and Yuhang Zhang
Reviewer 1:
Kun Qian
Reviewer 2:
Udochukwu B. Akuru
Reviewer 3:
Lia Elena Aciu
Energies 2023, 16(17), 6199; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176199
Submission received: 15 July 2023 / Revised: 21 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 26 August 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present and discuss their work on NVH analysis and optimization of construction hoist drive systems. The topic is within the scope of Applied Sciences. The work is systematic, complete, and well-organized. The results are convincing. Some minute details need to be adjusted.

Minor comments:

1）The derivation of formulas is too detailed, and the introduction of the underlying theory is too detailed, so please simplify it appropriately.

2）The font formatting of the text on page 27 is not uniform, please revise.

3）Section 3.4 Helical Gear Load Distribution Analysis Why only 40% and 100% conditions were used should be explained.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1, The algorithm implemented in the study for predicting noise should be clearly detailed in a workflow diagram.

2, Figures should be improved, text size on figure should be same as in-text.

3, Authors should provide validation of the obtained results.

The grammar appears satisfactory.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript deals with the improving of noisee, vibration and harshness  (NVH) level for the drive system of the construction hoist. The authors fould a gap in this domain, consisting in the expensive way used to evaluate the NVH performance. The research is a consistent one and implies a lot of effort using different sofware and simulation. The results seems to be important. I suggest to give some data concerning the previous research in the field to a better comparison of the values. Also I think that the first chapter should not mention the history but more interesting results obtained by other researchers. The mathematical part should not be so consistent and the focus on the obtained results compared with them could reveal the novelty of the research. In my opinion the authors can improve the presentation of their work in this manuscript. Please make sure that all abbreviations are explained, since the abstract.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop