Next Article in Journal
Review of Fault Detection and Diagnosis Techniques for AC Motor Drives
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Situation Awareness Measurement Method for Analyzing the Operators’ Situation Awareness of Multi-Module High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Different Doses of Organic Waste on Prairie Cordgrass (Spartina Pectinata L.) Yield and Selected Energy Parameters

by
Elżbieta Malinowska
* and
Beata Wiśniewska-Kadżajan
Faculty of Agrobioengineering and Animal Husbandry, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 14 Street, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(15), 5599; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155599
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 22 July 2023 / Accepted: 24 July 2023 / Published: 25 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section A: Sustainable Energy)

Abstract

:
Increasingly cultivated all over the world, energy crops, with their large biomass production, can be used to produce liquid biofuel and biogas. The aim of the research was to evaluate the yield and selected energy parameters of prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata L.) treated with different doses of municipal sewage sludge and mushroom substrate. Heat of combustion, calorific values and ash content were investigated in the first three years of its cultivation. Carried out between 2018 and 2020, the research was based on a field experiment established at an experimental facility in Central-Eastern Poland. Organic waste doses, each of them introducing 170 kg N ha−1, were applied once in spring 2018 before planting pieces of Spartina pectinata rhizomes. The experimental factors (organic waste doses and years of research) significantly affected the yield of prairie cordgrass. Significantly, the highest yield of its biomass was produced in response to municipal sewage sludge applied together with mushroom substrate (O25 + PP75) and in response to mushroom substrate applied on its own (SMS). Those values, averaged over three years of research, were, respectively, 4.23 and 4.18 Mg ha−1. Organic waste treatment had a significant impact on ash content in dry matter. On average, the highest ash content in dry matter was recorded in response to mushroom substrate (5.73%) and the lowest (4.98%) in plants treated with the highest dose of sewage sludge together with the lowest dose of mushroom substrate (O75 + PP25). The higher dry matter content in plant biomass was, the better the energy parameters were.

1. Introduction

The world’s energy needs are constantly increasing. In 2021, global demand for primary energy increased by almost 6%. This was due to, among other factors, the economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of global economy as well as global warming. As a result, energy needs for heating and cooling in the world have increased. The ever-increasing demand for energy also caused an increase in CO2 emission, which in 2021 reached a historic level of 36.3 gigatons [1,2]. Energy from plant biomass is considered environmentally friendly because the amount of carbon dioxide produced in the combustion process is compensated by the photosynthesis of energy crops. Thus, the production of energy from plant biomass contributes to the reduction in CO2 emission, thereby lowering the greenhouse effect [3]. Energy crops can be divided into four groups. Annual plants such as cereals, rapeseed, corn and sugar cane belong to the first one. The second group comprises woody plants of short rotation, i.e., willow, poplar and aspen. The third is constituted by fast-growing perennial grasses like giant miscanthus, reed canary grass, prairie cordgrass and switchgrass [4]. The last of the abovementioned groups of energy crops consists of perennials, e.g., Jerusalem artichoke. Plant biomass varies greatly in terms of dry matter content and chemical composition, which are both important from an energy point of view. The yield and calorific value, but also the content of ash, which remains as waste after combustion, are also important. Ash left after the combustion of plant biomass can be used as mineral fertilizer [5]. Organic waste containing plant nutrients can be successfully applied to energy crops. Materials used this way are sewage sludge, a byproduct of wastewater treatment; mushroom substrate [6,7,8,9], a waste product in the cultivation of white two-spore mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) and digestate from biogas plants [10,11]. The natural management of organic waste is important both from environmental and economic perspectives [12,13,14]. Agricultural use of waste organic materials contributes to increasing plant yield and improving soil physicochemical properties [15,16].
The aim of the experiment was to evaluate yield and selected energy parameters of prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata L.) in response to different doses of municipal sewage sludge and mushroom substrate. The following research hypothesis was formulated: the application of organic waste of fertilizing character increases the yield of Spartina pectinata L. and affects selected energy parameters.

2. Methodology

2.1. Description of the Experiment

The field experiment was conducted on the premises of the experimental facility of the University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce (52°17′ N, 22°28′ E) on soil classified as anthropogenic (A) culture-earth type (AK) and hortisol subtype (AKho) [17]. The soil had developed from glaciofluvial sand, and it had a heavy sandy loam texture with fine sandy loam in the subsoil. The plant used in the experiment was prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata L.). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with three replications, according to the following scheme:
  • Control (no fertilizer treatment);
  • Municipal sewage sludge, introducing 170 kg N ha−1 (0.907 kg of sludge per plot, i.e., 4.54 Mg ha−1), (SS);
  • Municipal sewage sludge + mushroom substrate, introducing 170 kg N ha−1, 75% was sewage sludge and 25% mushroom substrate (0.683 kg + 1.40 kg per plot, i.e., 3.38 Mg ha−1 + 7 Mg ha−1), (SS75 + SMS25);
  • Municipal sewage sludge + mushroom substrate, introducing 170 kg N ha−1, 50% was sewage sludge and 50% mushroom substrate (0.454 kg + 2.80 kg per plot, i.e., 2.25 Mg ha−1 + 14 Mg ha−1), (SS50 + SMS50);
  • Municipal sewage sludge + mushroom substrate, introducing 170 kg N ha−1, 25% was sewage sludge and 75% mushroom substrate (0.227 kg + 4.20 kg per plot, i.e., 1.13 Mg ha−1 + 21 Mg ha−1), (SS25 + SMS25);
  • Mushroom substrate, introducing 170 kg N ha−1 (5.60 kg per plot, i.e., 28 Mg ha−1), (SMS).
In the spring of 2018, microplots with an area of 2 m2 were arranged. Grass rhizomes were obtained by cutting the root system into pieces and plating them by hand at a depth of 15–20 cm, with three rhizomes per 1 m2. Waste organic materials were applied once, in the spring, before planting prairie cordgrass rhizomes. The choice of the abovementioned organic materials to be applied to the plant was dictated by a number of factors. The cultivation of bispore mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) is a dynamically developing branch of production in Poland, and in the Siedlce region it had developed intensively compared to other parts of the country. The research on the agricultural use of mushroom substrate in this area was extremely important because of the need for its disposal. Municipal sewage sludge was obtained from the sewage treatment plant in Siedlce. The capacity of the treatment plant was 24,000 m3 day−1 with 1897 Mg of sewage sludge produced a year, an average of 5.2 Mg day−1. In each year, mechanical weed control was used on the plots since herbicides would have damaged young shoots of plants.

2.2. Soil and Organic Materials Analysis

Before the experiment was established, a soil air-dry representative sample was collected from the arable layer (20 cm), and the following were determined:
  • Granulometric composition, using the Bouyoucosa–Casagrande aerometric method in the Prószyński modification in accordance with the Polish Standard PN-R-04033 [18] and with the Classification System of Soil Texture and Mineral Materials [19];
  • pH value in H2O and in 1 mol KCl dm−3, using the potentiometric method;
  • Total nitrogen (TN), carbon (TC) and hydrogen content, by elemental analysis using the PerkinElmer Series II 2400 CHNS/O Analyzer with the thermal conductivity detector (TCD);
  • The total content of P, K, Cd, Pb, Zn, Cr, Cu and Ni, by mineralizing soil samples with aqua regia and using the inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES) method at Eurofins OBiKŚ Polska Ltd. in Katowice, formerly the Centre for Environmental Research and Control.
Soil pH value in H2O was 6.93, but in 1 mol KCl dm−3 it was 6.60. Total N and C content in the soil (gkg−1) was 2.85 and 40.50, respectively. Soil content of the majority of heavy metals (Cr, Cd, Cu and Ni) before the experiment was several times lower than the amounts provided in the Regulation of the Ministry of the Environment [20] for light soils when applying municipal sewage sludge plants not intended for consumption or feed production. On the other hand, the content of Zn and Pb was within the standards. The content of heavy metals in the soil was (mgkg−1) Pb—48.89, Cd—0.959, Cr—8.95, Cu—18.85, Zn—149.7, Ni—5.53.
In representative samples of municipal sewage sludge and mushroom substrate the following were determined:
  • Dry matter, by drying the sample at 105 °C until constant weight was obtained;
  • pH value in H2O and 1 mol KCl dm−3, by the potentiometric method;
  • Total nitrogen (TN), by the modified Kjeldahl method, mineralizing samples in concentrated sulfuric acid (VI) in the presence of selenium mixture [21];
  • Organic carbon (Corg), by the oxidation–titration method [22];
  • Total content of macroelements (P and K) and heavy metals (Co, Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Zn and Ni), by mineralizing soil samples with aqua regia and using the inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP–OES) method.

2.3. Biomass

Prairie cordgrass biomass was harvested in January 2018 and 2019 and in February 2020, with the yield of fresh matter determined using the weight method. During the harvest, a representative sample of five shoots with leaves was collected from each plot to determine dry matter content and to perform chemical analyses. Dry matter yield was determined after drying plant material at 105 °C to obtain a constant weight. In representative samples of plants, after prior shredding and grinding, ash content (PN-ISO 117:2002), heat of combustion (PN-G-04513:1981) and calorific value in the natural and dry states were determined (PN-91/G-04510) in the Energy Company in Siedlce. Heat of combustion was determined after complete combustion of the samples in a pressurized oxygen atmosphere in the bomb calorimeter (constant volume), and the measurement of temperature rise was made in the vessel calorimeter.

2.4. Meteorological Conditions

Meteorological conditions from 2018–2020 were assessed on the basis of data made available by the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, National Research Institute (PIB) in Warsaw. In order to determine temporal variability and the impact of precipitation and air temperature on the growth and development of plants, Sielianinov’s hydrothermal coefficient (K) was determined according to the following formula:
K = P 0.1 Σ t
where:
P—monthly rainfall,
Σt—the sum of daily air temperature values in a given month [23].
Then, ten classes of hydrothermal conditions were established using Sielianinov’s coefficient (K):
K ≤ 0.4 extreme drought (ed),
0.4 < K ≤ 0.7 severe drought (sd),
0.7 < K ≤ 1.0 drought (d),
1.0 < K ≤ 1.3 moderate drought (md),
1.3 < K ≤ 1.6 optimal (o),
1.6 < K ≤ 2.0 moderately wet (mw),
2.0 < K ≤ 2.5 wet (w),
2.5 < K ≤ 3.0 severely wet (sw),
K > 3.0 extremely wet (ew) [24].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The results were subjected to statistical processing using analysis of variance for a two-factor experiment. The significance of the effect of experimental factors on the value of the examined parameters was assessed on the basis of the Fisher–Snedecor F test. The value of LSD0.05 (for a detailed comparison of means) was calculated with Tukey’s test. The Statistica StatSoft 13.1 [25] program was used for the calculations. Pearson linear correlation coefficients between the calorific value of the biomass and the selected energy parameters for p ≤ 0.05 were calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

Sielianinov’s coefficient (K) indicated that optimal hydrothermal conditions for the growth and development of prairie cordgrass were only in June, July and October in the first year of research (Table 1). The first year was the only one during the experiment in which optimal weather prevailed for a few months. The most difficult conditions for the growth and development of plants were in the second year, when, with the exception of May, extremely dry to quite dry months prevailed. In the third year of research, hydrothermal conditions were not favorable either. The month of April was extremely dry, while May and June were extremely wet. July was very dry, and August and September were quite dry. For many years, not only in Poland, problems related to long-term periods of drought have been observed [26,27].
Municipal sewage sludge applied to prairie cordgrass contained high amounts of dry matter (93%) and selected macroelements (Table 2). Its C/N ratio of 7.8 was beneficial for soil microorganisms and for plants. Its content of N, P and K was similar to that reported by other authors [28]. According to the literature [29], potassium content in municipal sewage sludge is usually low. Similarly, in the present experiment, its content was low, with 2.56 g kg−1. Sewage sludge usually contains high amounts of nutrients having a positive effect on the soil, i.e., on its chemical, biological and physical properties, and when applied to various plants, it may be more effective than mineral fertilizers [30,31]. The content of heavy metals in the sludge was relatively low (Table 3). Acceptable standards for their content are provided in the Regulation of the Ministry of the Environment [20]. The organic waste did not exceed them, which allowed its use in the cultivation of Spartina pectinata.
The 30% dry matter content of mushroom substrate was relatively high (Table 2 and Table 3), which was confirmed by many authors [32,33]. Organic carbon content, an indicator of soil biological activity, was 284 g kg−1. Mushroom substrate contained high amounts of nitrogen, with 20.9 g kg−1, and the C/N ratio was 13.6. Its reaction was close to neutral (pH 6.5). Its chemical composition determined in the experiment was confirmed by many reports in the literature on the nutritional value of mushroom substrate left after the cultivation of white mushrooms [34,35,36].
Years of research and doses of organic materials significantly affected the yield of fresh and dry biomass (Table 4). The lowest value was recorded in the first year of research, but with subsequent years it increased; a similar tendency was noted in the research of Kowalczyk-Juśko [37]. In the third year, the yield of dry matter was more than five times higher than in the first one and amounted on average to 7.18 Mg ha−1 DM. According to Kowalczyk-Juśko [37], the yield of prairie cordgrass ranged from 0.78 Mg ha−1 in the first year to 10.95 Mg ha−1 in the third. Studies conducted in Ireland and England by El Bassam [38] also indicated very low yield of the grass in the first year after planting. In the present experiment, the highest yield was noted in response to the combination of municipal sewage sludge applied with mushroom substrate at a dose of O25 + PP75 and in response to mushroom substrate applied on its own (SMS). Dry matter yield in those plots was 4.23 and 4.18 Mg ha−1, respectively, with 2.76 Mg ha−1 in the control plot.
Figure 1 presents the hygroscopic moisture of Spartina pectinata biomass in the natural state by year. It ranged from 3.78% to 5.76%, with the average value of 4.74% in the first year of research, 4.25% in the second, the lowest of all, and 5.58% in the third. According to Kowalczyk-Juśko [5], natural moisture content varied across different plant species, and for thornless rose it was 14.6%, for tuberous sunflower 9.7%, for Pennsylvania mallow 8.3% and 13.5% for prairie cordgrass. Excessive moisture can significantly reduce the calorific value of plant biomass.
Average ash content was lower in the Spartina pectinata natural state (5.03%) than in the dry state (5.30%) (Table 5). Treatment combinations significantly affected grass ash content in the dry state. According to Wilk [39], ash content in woody biomass ranged from 0.3 to 7.4% and from 4.3 to 10.4% in cereal straw. In contrast, in the biomass of various plants grown in Portugal and Spain, like Cytisus multiflorus (L’Hér.) Sweet, Erica australis (L.), Ulex europaeus (L.) and Pterospartum tridentatum (L.), ash content was significantly lower and ranged between 1.32 and 1.58% [40]. In turn, Miscanthus sacchariflorus contained 4.3% of ash in the dry state [41]. In the light of the present results, it can be concluded that Spartina pectinata ash content was not high and was within the range of average values for other energy crops.
Heat of combustion and calorific value are the main characteristics determining the suitability of crops for energy production [42]. The highest heat of combustion of prairie cordgrass biomass in the dry state as well as in the natural state, as an average from treatment combinations, was recorded in the second year of research, while it was the lowest in the first (Table 6). Natural-state biomass heat of combustion was lower than in the dry state. The heat of combustion of prairie cord grass in the natural state, averaged across years and treatment combinations, was 18,382 kJ kg−1, with 19,334 kJ kg−1 in the dry state. According to Kolowca and Knapik [43], Miscanthus gigantia heat of combustion was at a slightly higher level of 21.6 MJ kg−1. In turn, Kościk [44] observed a lower value of prairie cordgrass heat of combustion at the level of 17.3 MJ kg−1. For dry-state biomass from the control plot, heat of combustion was significantly higher than for plants treated with both sewage sludge and mushroom substrate at a dose of O25 + PP75. Lower heat of combustion values were recorded for other fertilizer plots than for the control plot, but these differences were not statistically significant.
The calorific value of prairie cordgrass in the dry state was 17,994 kJ kg−1 and was much higher than in the natural state (17,116 kJ kg−1) (Table 7). According to the literature, the calorific value of cereal straw was at a similar level: from 16.1 MJ kg−1 for barley to 17.3 MJ kg−1 for wheat [45], and for sugar miscanthus it was 16,743 kJ kg−1 [41]. Treatment did not cause significant differences in Spartina pectinata calorific value. For plants treated with organic waste, it was higher than for control ones, but the differences were not statistically significant. On the other hand, years of research significantly affected this feature, with the lowest calorific value in the first year.
The relationship between calorific value and other parameters of prairie cordgrass is presented in the form of linear correlation coefficients (Table 8). A weak negative relationship between ash content and moisture on the one hand and the calorific value on the other was found. The correlation coefficients were, respectively, r = −0.058 and r = −0.042, which indicates that the higher the ash content, the lower the calorific value was. Similarly, as biomass moisture increased, there was a decrease in calorific value, which was confirmed by the research of Wilk [39]. A statistically significant positive relationship was noted between heat of combustion and calorific value (r = 0.988). This means that as one of them increased, the other also increased, i.e., the greater the heat of combustion, the greater the calorific value. A significant positive relationship was also found between ash content and biomass moisture. According to Bilandzija et al. [46], calorific value of all energy crops depends on their moisture content and increases with increasing dry matter content. A significant negative relationship (r = −0.516) was found between prairie cordgrass ash content and moisture content.

4. Conclusions

Municipal sewage sludge and mushroom substrate applied to Spartina pectinata in various combinations, each dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1, significantly increased the biomass yield compared to the control plot. The combination of municipal sewage sludge with mushroom substrate at a dose of O25 + PP75 and mushroom substrate applied on its own (SMS) resulted in the highest yield (on average over years). More than 50% higher amounts of Spartina pectinata were recorded in those plots than in the control.
Ash content in prairie cordgrass biomass was not high. In the natural state, its average value was 5.03%, while in the dry state it was 5.30%. On average, the highest ash content was recorded in plants treated with mushroom substrate (5.73%) and the lowest (4.98%) in those treated with the highest dose of sludge together with the smallest dose of mushroom substrate (O75 + PP25). Ash content is very important for planning the use of plant biomass in the process of combustion on its own or with coal. Combined application of both sewage sludge and mushroom substrate is more effective than applying mushroom substrate only.
Heat of combustion and calorific value of prairie cordgrass significantly varied across growing seasons. Biomass energy parameters in the first year were slightly lower than in the second. The application of organic materials did not significantly affect calorific value. Due to varied yield and parameter content results of the studies on application of waste organic substances to energy crops, further research in this area is needed. The outcomes of such research are useful to the energy sector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.; Methodology, E.M.; Validation, B.W.-K.; Formal analysis, E.M.; Writing–original draft, B.W.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research carried out as part of the research theme No. 134/B/21 was financed by the science grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Statistical Review of World Energy 2022. Available online: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  2. IEA. 2022. Available online: https://www.iea.org/news/global-co2-emissions-rebounded-to-their-highest-level-in-history-in-2021 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  3. Cosentino, S.L.; Copani, V.; Patanè, C.; Mantineo, M.; D’Agosta, G.M. Agronomic, energetic and environmental aspects of biomass energy crops suitable for Italian environments. Ital. J. Agron. 2008, 3, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Blanco-Canqui, H. Energy crops and their implications on soil and environment. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kowalczyk-Juśko, A. Ash from different energy crops. Proc. ECOpole 2009, 3, 159–164. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  6. Demirbas, A.; Edris, G.; Alalayah, W.M. Sludge production from municipal wastewater treatment in sewage treatment plant. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2017, 39, 999–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antonkiewicz, J.; Baran, A.; Pałka, R.; Wisła-Świder, A.; Nowak, E.; Konieczka, P. A mixture of cellulose production waste with municipal sewage as new material for an ecological management of wastes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antonkiewicz, J.; Kołodziej, B.; Bielińska, E.J.; Witkowicz, R.; Tabor, S. Using Jerusalem artichoke to extract heavy metals from municipal sewage sludge amended soil. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jankowski, J.K.; Kołodziej, B.; Dubis, B.; Sugier, B.; Antonkiewicz, J.; Szatkowski, J. The effect of sewage sludge on the energy balance of cup plant biomass production. A six-year field experiment in Poland. Energy 2023, 276, 127478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lukehurst, C.T. Biogas from AD as a key technology for nutrient management in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In The Future of Biogas in Europe II Proceedings Report of the European Biogas Workshop 2003, October 2–4; Al Seadi, T., Holm-Nielsen, J.B., Eds.; University of Southern Denmark: Esbjerg, Denmark, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Losak, T.; Hlusek, J.; Zatloukalova, A.; Musilova, L.; Vitezova, M.; Skarpa, P.; Zlanalova, T.; Fryc, J.; Vitez, T.; Marecek, J.; et al. Digestate from biogas plants is an attractive alternative to mineral fertilisation of kohlrabi. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst. 2014, 2, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gasco, G.; Martinez-Inigo, M.; Lobo, M. Soil organic matter transformation after a sewage sludge application. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. EJEAFChe 2004, 3, 716–723. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bai, Y.; Zang, C.; Gu, M.; Gu, C.; Shao, H.; Guan, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhan, X.; Shan, Y.; Feng, K. Sewage sludge as an initial fertility driver for rapid improvement of mudflat salt-soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 578, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dingaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, W.; Jang, J.; Gong, C. Primary research on agricultural effect of sludge—Impact of sludge application on crop seeds germination and seeding growth. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 16, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Malinowska, E.; Kalembasa, S. Effect of liming and application of sludge on the content of nitrogen and carbon in test plants and in soil in a four-year pot experiment. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A. 2012, 19, 873–886. [Google Scholar]
  17. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, 4th ed.; International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS): Vienna, Austria, 2022; pp. 1–236. ISBN 979-8-9862451-1-9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Polish Standard PN-R-04033; Soils and Mineral Formations—Divisi on into Fractions and Granulometric Groups. Polish Committee for Standardization (PKN): Warszawa, Poland, 1998.
  19. Polish Society of Soil Science. Grading classification of soils and mineral formations. Roczn. Glebozn. 2009, 60, 5–16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of February 6, 2015 on the use of municipal sewage sludge. Dz.U. 2015 poz. 257. Dz.U. 2022 poz. 89. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20150000257 (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  21. Kalembasa, S.; Carlson, R.W.; Kalembasa, D. A new method for the reduction in nitrates in total nitrogen determination according to the Kjeldahl method. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 1989, 22, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalembasa, S.; Kalembasa, D. A quick method for determination of C/N ratio in mineral soils. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 1992, 25, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, A. Comparison of selected indices for the assessment of atmospheric drought in the Podkarpackie Province in the years 1901–2000. Woda-Sr.-Obsz. Wiej. 2012, 12, 365–376. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  24. Skowera, B.; Puła, J. Pluviometric extreme conditions in spring season in Poland in the years 1971–2000. Acta Agroph. 2004, 1, 171–177. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  25. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 13.1; StatSoft, Inc.: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2021. Available online: www.ststsoft.com(accessed on 25 May 2023).
  26. Devincentis, A.J. Scales of Sustainable Agricultural Water Management. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Seleiman, M.F.; Sautanen, A.; Aäkëla, P.S. Recycling sludge on cropland as fertilizers Advantages and risks. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chojnacka, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Szopa, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; Moustaks, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A. Management of biological sewage sludge: Fertilizer nitrogen recovery as the solution to fertilizer crisis. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 236, 116602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grobelak, A.; Stępień, W.; Kacprzak, M. Sewage sludge as an ingredient in fertilizers and soil substitutes. Inż. Ekolog. 2016, 48, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Antoniadis, V.; Koutroubas, S.D.; Fotiadis, S. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium availability in manure-and sewage sludgeapplied soil. Communic. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2015, 46, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soudani, L.; Maatoug, M.; Heilmeier, H.; Kharytonov, M.; Wiche, O.; Moschner, C.; Onyshchenkoc, E.; Bouchenafa, N. Fertilization value of municipal sewage sludge for eucalyptus camaldulensis plants. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 13, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jordan, S.N.; Mullen, G.J.; Murphy, M.C. Composition variability of spent mushroom compost in Ireland. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Czop, M.; Kłapcia, E. Evaluation of the suitability to organic recycling of the base coming from champignon mushroom farming. Arch. Gosp. Odpad. Ochr. Środ. 2015, 17, 139–150. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  34. Salomez, J.; De Bolle, S.; Sleutel, S.; De Neve, S.; Hofman, G. Nutrient legislation in flanders (Belgium). In Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium of CIEC; More Sustainability in Agriculture: New Fertilizers and Fertilization Management, Rome, Italy, 8–12 November; 2009; pp. 546–551. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan, B. Impact of different spent mushroom substrate doses on compactness and regrowth different kind of lawns mixtures. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric. Aliment. Pisc. Zootech. 2013, 305, 75–82. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  36. Jasińska, A.; Prasad, R.; Lisiecka, J.; Roszak, M.; Stoknes, K.; Mleczak, M.; Niedzielski, P. Combined dairy manure-food waste digestate as a medium for Pleurotus djamor—Mineral composition in substrate and bioaccumulation of elements in fruiting bodies. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kowalczyk-Juśko, A. Biometric and energetic parameters of cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link.) In the first three years of growth. Probl. Agric. Eng. 2013, 2, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  38. El Bassam, N. Energy Plant Species; James and James Science Publishers: London, UK, 1998; p. 321. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wilk, B. Determination of the Dependence of Calorific Value on Selected Physic Chemical Properties of Biomass. Matt. Seminar. “Analytical Techniques and Research Procedures in Application to New Legal Conditions in the Energy Sector”; IChPW: Zabrze, Poland, 2006. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  40. Viana, H.; Vega-Nieva, D.J.; Torres, L.O.; Lousada, J.; Aranha, J. Fuel characterization and biomass combustion properties of selected native woody shrub species from central Portugal and NW Spain. Fuel 2012, 102, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kowalczyk-Juśko, A. Chemical composition and energetic characteristics of Miscanthus sacchariflorus biomass as used for generation of Energy. Przemysł Chem. 2016, 95, 2326–2329. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  42. Bałuch-Małecka, A.; Olszewska, M.; Alberski, J. Yielding and energy value in selected species of tall grasses. Łąkarstwo w Polsce 2017, 20, 7–24. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  43. Kolowca, J.; Knapik, P. Właściwości mechaniczne źdźbła miskanta olbrzymiego. Inż. Roln. 2008, 9, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kościk, B. (Ed.) Energy Crops; Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie: Lublin, Polish, 2003; p. 146. ISBN 83-7259-091-5. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  45. Niedziółka, I.; Zuchniarz, A. Quality assessment for plant biomass-based briquettes produced using worm type compacting unit. Inż. Roln. 2006, 14, 79–86. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  46. Bilandzija, N.; Jurisic, V.; Voca, N.; Leto, J.; Matin, A.; Sito, S.; Kricka, T. Combustion properties of Miscanthus x giganteus biomass—Optimization of harvest time. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Hygroscopic moisture (%) of Spartina pectinata in the natural state by year.
Figure 1. Hygroscopic moisture (%) of Spartina pectinata in the natural state by year.
Energies 16 05599 g001
Table 1. Value of Sielianinov’s hydrothermal coefficient (K) in individual months of in 2018–2020.
Table 1. Value of Sielianinov’s hydrothermal coefficient (K) in individual months of in 2018–2020.
YearMonth
AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
Year 1 (2018)1.07 (md)0.50
(sd)
1.38
(o)
1.58
(o)
0.44
(sd)
0.92 (d)1.52
(o)
Year 2 (2019)0.32 (ed)2.83
(sw)
0.44
(sd)
1.72
(d)
1.21 (md)1.01 (md)0.62
(sd)
Year 3 (2020)0.29 (ed)3.24 (ew)3.02 (ew)0.69
(sd)
1.09 (md)1.06 (md)2.73
(sw)
md—moderate drought, ed—extreme drought, sd—severe drought, sw—severely wet, ew—extremely wet, o—optimal, d—drought, md—moderate drought.
Table 2. Chemical composition of organic materials used in the experiment.
Table 2. Chemical composition of organic materials used in the experiment.
Organic WastepHDM (%)Corg
(g kg−1)
C/NN
(g kg−1)
P
(g kg−1)
K
(g kg−1)
municipal sewage sludge (SS)6.4093.03487.8040.519.82.56
mushroom substrate (SMS)6.4130.028413.620.98.8611.2
Table 3. Content of selected heavy metals in organic materials used in the experiment.
Table 3. Content of selected heavy metals in organic materials used in the experiment.
Type of Organic WasteHeavy Metal Content (mg kg−1 DM)
CoPbCdCrZnNi
municipal sewage sludge (SS)3.5836.121.8115.44987.244.23
mushroom substrate (SMS)0.4153.980.2873.08156.94.84
Table 4. Biomass yield of Spartina pectinata (Mg ha−1) in the first three years of cultivation.
Table 4. Biomass yield of Spartina pectinata (Mg ha−1) in the first three years of cultivation.
Year of Research (B)Experimental Plot (A)Mean
Control Plot SSSS75 + SMS25SS50 + SMS50SS25 + SMS75SMS
Fresh Matter
Year 1 1.201.511.631.471.891.781.58
Year 22.313.894.603.473.684.103.68
Year 3 6.899.548.549.1410.129.748.99
Mean3.474.984.924.695.235.214.75
LSD0.05      A-0.980; B-0.563; A/B-1.70; B/A-1.38
dry matter
Year 1 0.961.221.301.211.471.421.26
Year 21.963.073.772.782.913.242.96
Year 3 5.377.356.757.438.307.897.18
Mean2.763.883.943.814.234.183.80
LSD0.05         A-0.333; B-0.191; A/B-0.469; B/A-0.341
SS—municipal sewage sludge dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1; SMS—mushroom substrate dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1; SS75 + SMS25; SS50 +SMS50; SS25 + SMS75—municipal sewage sludge used together with mushroom substrate in various proportions, each dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1.
Table 5. Ash content (%) in the Spartina pectinata biomass in the natural and dry states.
Table 5. Ash content (%) in the Spartina pectinata biomass in the natural and dry states.
Year of Research (B)Experimental Plot (A)Mean
Control Plot SSSS75 + SMS25SS50 + SMS50SS25 + SMS75SMS
Biomass in the Natural State
Year 1 5.175.335.115.615.315.205.29
Year 2 5.315.095.695.375.595.825.48
Year 3 5.084.133.413.574.684.984.31
Mean5.194.854.744.855.195.335.03
LSD0.05    A-NS        B-0.449       A/B-NS        B/A-NS
Biomass in the dry state
Year 1 5.395.605.385.865.585.515.55
Year 2 5.545.315.965.615.836.085.72
Year 3 5.394.383.613.724.955.614.61
Mean5.445.104.985.065.455.735.30
LSD0.05 A-0.721            B-0.414      A/B-1.25       B/A-1.01
SS—municipal sewage sludge dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1; SMS—mushroom substrate dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1; SS75 + SMS25; SS50 +SMS50; SS25 + SMS75—municipal sewage sludge used together with mushroom substrate in various proportions, each dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1, NS—not significant difference.
Table 6. Heat of combustion (kJ kg−1) of Spartina pectinata biomass in the natural and dry states.
Table 6. Heat of combustion (kJ kg−1) of Spartina pectinata biomass in the natural and dry states.
Year of Research (B)Experimental Plot (A)Mean
Control Plot SSSS75 + SMS25SS50 + SMS50SS25 + SMS75SMS
Biomass in the Natural State
Year 1 18,36017,25918,14318,46018,09018,13018,074
Year 2 19,00318,73418,87918,87718,58118,87418,825
Year 3 18,18318,87818,53817,95618,03717,89618,248
Mean18,51618,29018,52018,43118,23618,30018,382
LSD0.05         A-NS                  B-309.3           A/B-932.6          B/A-757.5
Biomass in the dry state
Year 1 19,46218,23619,20819,10918,86118,88618,960
Year 2 19,81719,54319,76219,73519,36919,72919,660
Year 3 19,63120,03219,64318,96019,07718,96019,383
Mean19,63719,27019,53919,26819,10119,19219,334
LSD0.05      A-502.2                B-288.4          A/B-869.8          B/A-706.5
SS—municipal sewage sludge dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1; SMS—mushroom substrate dose introducing 170 kg Nha−1; SS75 + SMS25; SS50 +SMS50; SS25 + SMS75—municipal sewage sludge used together with mushroom substrate in various proportions, each dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1, NS—not significant difference.
Table 7. Calorific value (kJ kg−1) of Spartina pectinata biomass in the dry and natural states.
Table 7. Calorific value (kJ kg−1) of Spartina pectinata biomass in the dry and natural states.
Years of Research (B)Experimental Plot (A)Mean
Control Plot SSSS75 + SMS25SS50 + SMS50SS25 + SMS75SS
Biomass in the Natural State
Year 1 17,07016,00116,84117,09716,80616,86016,779
Year 2 17,73417,46117,61017,60517,31617,60817,556
Year 3 17,23817,58617,24716,65116,74416,60517,012
Mean17,34717,01617,23317,11816,95517,02417,116
LSD0.05    A-NS                   B-306.9             A/B-925.5       B/A-751.8
Biomass in the dry state
Year 1 18,24217,04517,94717,86417,62717,66417,732
Year 2 18,59818,32118,54818,51718,15418,51718,109
Year 3 18,41018,79818,39917,71817,78317,73718,141
Mean17,75018,05518,29818,03317,85517,97317,994
LSD0.05    A-NS                   B-360.6          A/B-883.2         B/A-1087
SS—municipal sewage sludge dose introducing 170 kg Nha−1; SMS—mushroom substrate dose introducing 170 kg Nha−1; SS75 + SMS25; SS50 +SMS50; SS25 + SMS75—municipal sewage sludge used together with mushroom substrate in various proportions, each dose introducing 170 kg N ha−1, NS—not significant difference.
Table 8. Linear correlation coefficients between calorific value, moisture, ash content and heat of combustion of Spartina pectinata biomass.
Table 8. Linear correlation coefficients between calorific value, moisture, ash content and heat of combustion of Spartina pectinata biomass.
Biomass Energy Parameter Calorific ValueMoistureAsh ContentHeat of Combustion
Calorific value1.00
Moisture−0.0421.00
Ash content−0.058−0.516 *1.00
Heat of combustion0.988 *−0.029−0.0771.00
* significant relationship p ≤ 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malinowska, E.; Wiśniewska-Kadżajan, B. The Effects of Different Doses of Organic Waste on Prairie Cordgrass (Spartina Pectinata L.) Yield and Selected Energy Parameters. Energies 2023, 16, 5599. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155599

AMA Style

Malinowska E, Wiśniewska-Kadżajan B. The Effects of Different Doses of Organic Waste on Prairie Cordgrass (Spartina Pectinata L.) Yield and Selected Energy Parameters. Energies. 2023; 16(15):5599. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malinowska, Elżbieta, and Beata Wiśniewska-Kadżajan. 2023. "The Effects of Different Doses of Organic Waste on Prairie Cordgrass (Spartina Pectinata L.) Yield and Selected Energy Parameters" Energies 16, no. 15: 5599. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16155599

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop