Next Article in Journal
Heat and Mass Transfer in Structural Ceramic Blocks: An Analytical and Phenomenological Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Multifractal Analysis of the Mechanical PropOKerties of the Texture of Biopolymer-Inorganic Composites of Chitosan-Silicon Dioxide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System

School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 400301, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(19), 7148; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148
Submission received: 1 September 2022 / Revised: 24 September 2022 / Accepted: 25 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022

Abstract

This paper reviews the heat transfer model for geothermal reservoirs, the fracture network in reservoirs, and the numerical model of hydraulic fracturing. The first section reviews the heat transfer models, which contain the single-porosity model, the dual-porosity model, and the multi-porosity model; meanwhile the mathematical equations of the porosity model are summarized. Then, this paper introduces the fracture network model in reservoirs and the numerical method of computational heat transfer. In the second section, on the basis of the conventional fracture theory, the PKN (Perkins–Kern–Nordgren) model and KGD (Khristianovic–Geertsma–De Klerk) model are reviewed. Meanwhile, the DFN (discrete fracture network) model, P3D (pseudo-3D) model, and PL3D (planar 3D) model are reviewed. The results show that the stimulated reservoir volume method has advantages in describing the fracture network. However, stimulated reservoir volume methods need more computational resources than conventional fracture methods. The third section reviews the numerical models of hydraulic fracturing, which contains the finite element method (FEM), the discrete element method (DEM), and the boundary element method (BEM). The comparison of these methods shows that the FEM can reduce the computational resources when calculating the fluid flow, heat transfer and fracture propagations in a reservoir. Thus, a mature model for geothermal reservoirs can be developed by coupling the processes of heat transfer, fluid flow and fracture propagation.
Keywords: hot dry rock; porosity model; fracture network; hydraulic fracturing; numerical model hot dry rock; porosity model; fracture network; hydraulic fracturing; numerical model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, X.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, X.; Meng, N. A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System. Energies 2022, 15, 7148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148

AMA Style

Gao X, Li T, Zhang Y, Kong X, Meng N. A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System. Energies. 2022; 15(19):7148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Xiang, Tailu Li, Yao Zhang, Xiangfei Kong, and Nan Meng. 2022. "A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System" Energies 15, no. 19: 7148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148

APA Style

Gao, X., Li, T., Zhang, Y., Kong, X., & Meng, N. (2022). A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System. Energies, 15(19), 7148. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop