Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigations of a Counter-Current Moving Bed Reactor for Thermochemical Energy Storage at High Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
A Cloud-Based In-Field Fleet Coordination System for Multiple Operations
Previous Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Wave Energy Resources Using Various Time Dependent Criteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dry Above Ground Biomass for a Soybean Crop Using an Empirical Model in Greece

Energy Footprint of Mechanized Agricultural Operations

Center for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd., 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
School of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(3), 769;
Received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 4 February 2020 / Accepted: 7 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supply Chain Management for Bioenergy and Bioresources)
The calculation of the energy cost of a cultivation is a determining factor in the overall assessment of agricultural sustainability. Most studies mainly examine the entire life cycle of the operation, considering reference values and reference databases for the determination of the machinery contribution to the overall energy balance. This study presents a modelling methodology for the precise calculation of the energy cost of performing an agricultural operation. The model incorporates operational management into the calculation, while simultaneously considering the commercially available machinery (implements and tractors). As a case study, the operation of tillage was used considering both primary and secondary tillage (moldboard plow and field cultivator, respectively). The results show the importance of including specific operation parameters and the available machinery as part of determining the accurate total energy consumption, even though the field size and available time do not have a significant effect. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural operations; energy use; assessment tool; workability; machinery agricultural operations; energy use; assessment tool; workability; machinery
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lampridi, M.; Kateris, D.; Sørensen, C.G.; Bochtis, D. Energy Footprint of Mechanized Agricultural Operations. Energies 2020, 13, 769.

AMA Style

Lampridi M, Kateris D, Sørensen CG, Bochtis D. Energy Footprint of Mechanized Agricultural Operations. Energies. 2020; 13(3):769.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lampridi, Maria, Dimitrios Kateris, Claus G. Sørensen, and Dionysis Bochtis. 2020. "Energy Footprint of Mechanized Agricultural Operations" Energies 13, no. 3: 769.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop