Next Article in Journal
Recurrent Neural Network-Based Hourly Prediction of Photovoltaic Power Output Using Meteorological Information
Next Article in Special Issue
Disturbance Rejection Control Method of Double-Switch Buck-Boost Converter Using Combined Control Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Fuel Type and Operation Parameters on Combustion and NOx Emission of the Iron Ore Sintering Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Voltage Ride-Through Operation of Grid-Connected Microgrid Using Consensus-Based Distributed Control
Article Menu
Issue 2 (January-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2019, 12(2), 214;

Sequential Model Predictive Control of Three-Phase Direct Matrix Converter

Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW 2007, Sydney, Australia
College of Electric Power, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010000, China
Departamento de Ing. Electrica, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso 2390123, Chile
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 7500791, Chile
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 November 2018 / Revised: 28 December 2018 / Accepted: 6 January 2019 / Published: 10 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Control in Power Electronics)
Full-Text   |   PDF [8471 KB, uploaded 10 January 2019]   |  


The matrix converter (MC) is a promising converter that performs the direct AC-to-AC conversion. Model predictive control (MPC) is a simple and powerful tool for power electronic converters, including the MC. However, weighting factor design and heavy computational burden impose significant challenges for this control strategy. This paper investigates the generalized sequential MPC (SMPC) for a three-phase direct MC. In this control strategy, each control objective has an individual cost function and these cost functions are evaluated sequentially based on priority. The complex weighting factor design process is not required. Compared with the standard MPC, the computation burden is reduced because only the pre-selected switch states are evaluated in the second and subsequent sequential cost functions. In addition, the prediction model computation for the following cost functions is also reduced. Specifying the priority for control objectives can be achieved. A comparative study with traditional MPC is carried out both in simulation and an experiment. Comparable control performance to the traditional MPC is achieved. This controller is suitable for the MC because of the reduced computational burden. Simulation and experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. View Full-Text
Keywords: Matrix converter (MC); model predictive control (MPC); sequential model predictive control (SMPC); weighting factors Matrix converter (MC); model predictive control (MPC); sequential model predictive control (SMPC); weighting factors

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Norambuena, M.; Li, L.; Dorrell, D.; Rodriguez, J. Sequential Model Predictive Control of Three-Phase Direct Matrix Converter. Energies 2019, 12, 214.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top