Next Article in Journal
Environmental Analysis of Waste-to-Energy—A Portuguese Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Classification of Many Abnormal Events in Radial Distribution Feeders Using the Complex Morlet Wavelet and Decision Trees
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Wearable Device Technology and Its Applications to the Mining Industry

Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 608-737, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(3), 547; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030547
Submission received: 6 February 2018 / Revised: 25 February 2018 / Accepted: 28 February 2018 / Published: 4 March 2018

Abstract

:
This paper reviews current trends in wearable device technology, and provides an overview of its prevalent and potential deployments in the mining industry. This review includes the classification of wearable devices with some examples of their utilization in various industrial fields as well as the features of sensors used in wearable devices. Existing applications of wearable device technology to the mining industry are reviewed. In addition, a wearable safety management system for miners and other possible applications are proposed. The findings of this review show that by introducing wearable device technology to mining sites, the safety of mining operations can be enhanced. Therefore, wearable devices should be further used in the mining industry.

1. Introduction

A considerable amount of attention has been paid to wearable (electronic) devices since Google Inc. recently launched head-mounted displays [1]. Wearable devices have managed to garner a position of significance in the consumer electronics market in a short time, and are considered a new means of addressing the needs of many industries. For example, the construction industry has studied the use of wearable devices in the workplace for health and safety management by proximity detection and physiological monitoring of construction workers [2]. The logistics industry has begun using wearable barcode scanner gloves called ProGloves to simplify work that does not involve the use of hands [3], and some insurance companies are promoting the use of wearable devices to encourage healthier eating habits and improve corporate wellness among workers [4]. Furthermore, several wearable devices, such as fitness trackers, are used by medical professionals to acquire physiological, behavioral, and contextual data for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of chronic diseases [5,6,7]. Although many studies are underway to determine how these devices can be best adapted to different industries, it is expected that the applications of wearable device technology will rapidly expand in the near future [8].
In recent years, some applications of wearable devices have been reported in the mining industry to support production process control in hard rock mines [9], health and safety management in coal mines [10,11,12], and environmental quality monitoring in industrial mineral mines [13]. For example, a smart safety helmet with methane and carbon monoxide gas sensors was developed to alert underground coal mine workers when the concentration of harmful gases exceeded a given limit [10]. Because many accidents in underground coal mines are caused by gas leakages, the smart safety helmet shows how wearable device technology can be adapted to the mining industry for health and safety management. However, no study to date has summarized cases where wearable devices have been used in mining, so that their current and potential uses can be understood easily.
The purpose of this study is to review trends in wearable device technology and its applications to the mining industry. This paper presents a classification of wearable devices and features of sensors that can be attached to them. Current cases of the use of wearable devices in mining sites are reported, and possible applications including a wearable safety management system for miners are proposed.

2. Classification of Wearable Devices

Wearable devices can be classified based on their function, appearance, proximity to the human body, and other parameters [14,15]. This study classifies them according to their functional properties and capabilities to further explain their applications to industrial sectors, as shown in Table 1.

2.1. Smartwatch

Smartwatches are computerized devices or small computers intended to be worn on the wrist, and have expanded functionality that is often related to communication. Most current smartwatch models are based on a mobile operating system. Some operate as smartphone-paired devices and provide an additional screen with which to inform the wearer of new notifications, such as messages received, calls, or calendar reminders. Manufacturers continue to develop their products and add features, such as waterproof frames, global positioning system (GPS) navigation systems, and fitness/health tracking features [16]. With the addition of reliable, sensitive inertial sensors on them, smartwatches can now be used to capture and analyze hand gestures, such as smoking or other activities [17].

2.2. Smart Eyewear

Another category of wearable devices, smart glasses or smart goggles are used for various applications in optical head-mounted displays (OHMDs), heads-up displays (HUDs), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), Mixed Reality (MR), and smart contact lenses. Despite differences in functionality and design, all smart glasses can be divided into two groups: those paired with a smartphone, needed to see images on the smartphone screen, or separate ones, which require a wired connection with a source device [16]. The displays of smart glasses can be monocular if the information is displayed for a single eye or binocular if an image is displayed for both.

2.3. Fitness Tracker

Fitness trackers, also known as activity trackers, are typically worn on the wrist, chest, or ears, and are designed to monitor and track outdoor sport activities and measure fitness-related metrics, such as the speed and distance of running, exhalation, pulse rate, and sleeping habits [18]. Some studies in [19,20,21] examined a number of activity trackers and measured their accuracy and reliability at counting steps. The conclusion was that some trackers perform well indoors and provide valid results, whereas others are more suitable for outdoor activities. Researchers suggest that trackers provide health empowerment for users [22], and their adoption can encourage overweight children to exercise more [23]. Professional soccer teams in Europe and the United States have used the activity tracker miCoach, manufactured by Adidas to quantify the physical performance of players [24].

2.4. Smart Clothing

Although aspects of smart clothing are similar to other types of wearable devices that monitor the physical condition of the wearer, they include a broad list of wearables, ranging from sportswear and consumer sports apparel (smart shirts and body suits) to chest straps, medical apparel, work wear monitoring apparel, military apparel, and e-textiles [25]. Smart clothing consists of a range of articles, although it is typically in the form of shirts, socks, yoga pants, shoes, bow ties with secret cameras, helmets, and caps with a wide range of sensors and features. Wearable smart biometric devices have attracted the attention of professional sports leaders in golf, soccer, athletics, racing, basketball, and baseball, and teams and athletes are already benefitting from the application of wearables to monitor the physical condition of players while training, to reduce the number of injuries and enhance team performance [26]. Smart clothing has the potential to be exceedingly beneficial for firefighters [27], at construction sites [28,29], and for transportation [30,31].

2.5. Wearable Camera

In contrast to conventional cameras, the user-friendly design, mobility, and flexibility of wearable cameras have attracted significant interest from consumers. The appeal of these cameras is that they are well-suited for creating first-person videos and photos in real time. Two major types of wearable cameras are used: small cameras that can be attached to either the body or clothes, or can even be worn in the ear, and larger cameras with mounting attachments to affix to caps or helmets [16]. Some researchers have shown the significance of wearable cameras for fall detection [32] and monitoring ecological environments [33].

2.6. Wearable Medical Device

A wearable medical device typically consists of one or more biosensors used to monitor a variety of physiological data to prevent disease, provide early diagnoses, and facilitate treatment and home rehabilitation [34,35]. Digital healthcare wearable devices are often grouped together with other wearables, such as activity monitors, smartwatches, smart clothing, and patches, and are all intended to help gather important data concerning the health of the patient using non-invasive sensors installed on the device.

3. Features of Sensors Used in Wearable Devices

Various types of sensors are used in wearable devices depending on the intended application. Many manufacturers around the world produce such sensors for individuals or professional developers. Because sensors are important components of wearable devices best-suited to the mining industry, this paper reviews the features of sensors by dividing them into four major groups: environmental sensors, biosensors, location tracking sensors, and other sensors.

3.1. Environmental Sensors

Environmental sensors are used for measuring, monitoring, and recording environmental conditions or properties [36], such as barometric pressure, relative humidity, luminosity, temperature, dust, and water level. Light sensors (see Figure 1a) that can be used to detect light are widespread in scientific applications and everyday consumer products, such as motion light sensors, ambient light sensors, outside lights, security lights, and traffic light sensors. Sound sensors or microphones (see Figure 1b) are employed to determine the sound intensity of an environment. They come in multiple forms including condensers, ribbons, carbon, and dynamic microphones [37]. The most common type consists of dynamic microphones that measure noise levels in decibels at frequencies to which humans are sensitive.
A humidity sensor (see Figure 1c) measures the relative humidity in the air for use in moisture and temperature measurements [38]. These are sometimes referred to as humidity/dew sensors, and can be found in heating, ventilation, or air conditioning systems in buildings. Flame sensors (see Figure 1d) are used to detect open flames or fire, and are more sensitive and accurate than commonly used smoke or heat detectors. Fume sensors (see Figure 1e) perform a similar function in detecting smoke, alcohol, and other harmful airborne gases.

3.2. Biosensors

The scope of biosensors has expanded with the increasing demand for health monitoring. These sensors allow people to be aware of their health status at all times, and are used by healthcare professionals in the early diagnosis and prevention of disease [39,40]. Examples include body temperature sensors, heart-rate-monitoring sensors, electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG) sensors, blood pressure sensors, and glucose level sensors.
A heart-rate-monitoring module (Figure 2a) can be used to measure the electrical activity of the heart, and is intended for use in extracting, amplifying, and filtering bio-potential signals to generate the heart rate [41]. Typically, heart monitors require the use of biomedical sensor pads and cables. The finger-clip heart rate sensor shown in Figure 2b is a high-performance optical biosensor that measures the change in the movement of blood in the body. Biosensors are common in medical electronics intended for indoor use to monitor the patient’s health [42].

3.3. Position- and Location-Tracking Sensors

Location- and position-tracking sensors [43] (i.e., GPS, altimeter, magnetometer, compasses, and accelerometers) are the most common type of sensors on wearable devices, such as activity trackers, smartwatches, and even medical wearables where they are used to check the physical activity and health of patients. A GPS module (see Figure 3a) is a three-axis sensor used in spatial navigation that can determine location, altitude, and speed at any time and in most weather conditions. However, in the mining industry, there are few examples of the use of GPS (only in outdoor open-pit mines) modules for tracking purposes [44,45,46,47]. Because signals needed for GPS modules are not available indoors, they are considered unsuitable for underground tracking systems. A compass (see Figure 3b) is a simple magnetometer that defines the direction of the climatic magnetic field.
A magnetometer sensor can be used to measure the magnetic field at a specific location. As it can detect ferrous metals, it can be used for tracking metallic vehicles [48] and human body motions (when jointly used with accelerometer and/or smartphones) [49,50,51]. Another common type of inertial sensor is an accelerometer, which has an extended range of sensing capability. They are available in one-, two-, three-, or six-axis implementations (see Figure 3c), and have high capability in fall detection and safety management applications.

3.4. Other Sensors

Other sensors include a variety of detectors and sensors available on the market, usually found on consumer wearable devices. Wearable cameras and smart glasses are often described together with camera sensors as the main part of these devices. Communication sensor modules (i.e., Bluetooth, Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID), Wi-Fi, etc.) provide communication and data exchange features to wearable devices. These sensors are being adopted in the mining industry for tracking and other purposes [52]. Motion sensors, speed sensors, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors (compound unit of accelerometer, gyroscope, and, sometimes, magnetometers), ultrasonic sensors, and infrared receiver (IR) sensors (small microchips with photocells to catch infrared light) are also used as electronic components of wearable devices.

4. Applications of Wearable Devices to the Mining Industry

4.1. Current Applications in the Mining Sector

Vandrico Solutions Inc. in Canada is developing a head-mounted device similar to Google Glass that is described as the first SmartGlass application intended for the mining sector [9]. The project is expected to be used in 50 mines around the world where the Metrics Manager™ by Motion Metrics International Corp. is currently being used. This collaboration enables the project to offer special features, and improve the efficiency and safety of operations in hard rock mining. Examples of the applications supported by the smart eyewear include time management for controlling mining equipment, free access to the most commonly accessed information, and production process control and monitoring, such as conveyor belt loading supervision. The core of the application is based on the identification of location by GPS and information exchange through the communication features of the glass. Although the hardware of the project has not yet been decided, the company focuses on the smart HUD system of glasses by Recon Instruments. The smart display is intended to allow each user to interact with the environment hands-free and notify about the mining operation most needed. The camera on the device can be used to take images or videos in emergency situations, such as mine machine maintenance or repair, and send them to administration staff for supervision or advice.
Deloitte Wearables is another Canadian company with a mining-site-focused wearable project [11]. It is different from other similar companies as they are targeting safety goals with another type of wearable smart helmet. This new wearable device is lightweight, and can be attached to the back or front of a miner’s helmet. It contains sensors to detect levels of hazardous gases in the air, a radiation sensor, a temperature and humidity sensor, and other sensors depending on the type of mine. In addition to providing an alert system with yellow to red lights for emergency situations, the helmet facilitates communication between managers and miners. The accompanying software platform will allow managers to track the device and monitor the actions of workers. This project is being developed in partnership with two other companies, Cortex Design and Vandrico. In turn, the Vandrico team built the software platform with a tracking system for the workforce and Cortex Design produced the project’s hardware system [11]. The Cortex team visited a mine in Sudbury and held close conversations with the miners to ask for suggestions for designing the device to meet challenges at the mining site. The tracking system is based on radio frequency identification tags for the administration to obtain information about the locations of workers for better management. The device is fully rechargeable, and can be controlled even with gloves on. The smart gadget senses body gestures to accomplish tasks.
In South Africa, the mining safety systems company Expert Mining Solutions is developing the “Life” wearable, which incorporates sensors and actuators to acquire the brain activities of equipment drivers (haul trucks, excavators, dozers, graders, and water trucks) and monitor fatigue at coal mines operated by Anglo American Metallurgical Coal [12]. The Life can accurately measure brainwaves of the wearer and store data for medical analysis. The device targets mine operators to focus on possible risks in the mining environment. It detects the lack of signals in the brain, such as to determine sleepiness (the system uses an advanced measurement tool for the operator’s resistance to sleep), diet, or medical conditions that may cause fatigue in workers. When this device is deployed, it is expected that the rate of accidents will be reduced and the awareness of vehicle drivers will increase. The technology in Life was developed at four universities, and has now been certified to detect fatigue with an almost 95% accuracy. The device has been used in trials over the past five years in mines operated by Assmang in the Northern Cape, which was the first official use of wearables in the South African mining industry.
Respirable silica dust, also known as respirable crystalline silica (RCS), is a natural substance found in rocks during the mining process, and is a major harmful contaminant for miners. This fine dust causes lung-related chronic diseases [53,54]. To analyze the most hazardous areas of a mine site and develop prevention tactics, a wearable dust assessment technology known as the Helmet-Cam has been tested at two industrial mineral mines [13]. The device consists of a video camera attached to the helmet, a real-time, data-logging, respirable dust monitor on the worker’s belt or backpack, a video monitor, and a safety vest to hold the entire system. When the captured video and dust data are uploaded to software, it automatically analyzes the concentration of respirable silica dust in the air.

4.2. Application to Mine Safety Management

The approaches described thus far are one-sided or do not address complex needs in areas of safety, communication, and occupational health in the mining industry. Therefore, from the perspective of providing wearable devices for mine workers to improve safety, this study proposes a wearable safety management system for miners (Figure 4). The system includes the combined utilization of several wearables (Figure 5) and is intended to improve safety, provide hands-free operation, and help monitor occupational health. The system consists of the following: a sensor-equipped safety vest (Figure 5a), smart eyewear (Figure 5b,c), a smart helmet (Figure 5d), and a commercially available Android system smartwatch (Figure 5e). The proposed system can be expanded by additional sensors or electronic equipment, or reduced in complexity according to the specific needs of the worker and mine operations.
The safety helmet is worn by all mine workers during work shifts regardless of the type of mine, underground or open pit. Therefore, almost all main sections of the system (data transmission and controller board parts) are designed on the helmet, and other wearables are connected to the board through wireless connection modules using either Bluetooth or RFID. As Arduino is a widely used hardware and easy-to-use open-source software platform in most electronics projects, the Arduino Uno board was used as an example to control the microcontroller board in the proposed system. To allow the worker to operate without worrying about turning the light emitting diode (LED) head lamp on and off on the helmet or changing brightness according to the luminosity of the environment, a lighting section not displayed on the safety helmet (see Figure 4) can be included as part of the system using a pair of light sensors.
If there is need for brain activity sensors, the inside flat border of the helmet is the most appropriate location for sensor installation as it is in permanent contact with the head of the wearer. The equipment for the detection of temperature, humidity, sound, air quality, and fumes should be mounted on the helmet in a special waterproof enclosure. Because the miner needs to be aware of the sensor results at any given time, the information should be displayed as numbers or words on a screen, or liquid crystal display (LCD), attached to the safety vest. The alert system, which can be also supported, sounds a loud alarm (the structure of the emergency notifications is explained in detail below) in emergency situations to notify miners of danger.
Although there is no commercial wearable clothing for the mining industry in particular, the regular safety vests of miners can form a kind of smart clothing when smart electronic components are used. The attached environmental sensors (sound sensor to measure the noise level of the environment and dust sensor to check the concentration of hazardous particles in the air) and biosensors (body temperature sensor and pulse rate sensor to monitor the miner’s basic physiological conditions) enable the real-time measurement of both environmental conditions and the health of the wearer.
The most important part of the system is the smart glasses that, as they do not require operation with the hands, enhance efficiency and boost the decision-making abilities of the workforce. In this system, eyeglasses are intended for use in mining sites with four goals:
  • a screen displaying important notifications (the notifications are sent to the glass by mobile phone over Bluetooth);
  • the scanning of the situation through the glasses and providing specific guidelines to follow (for example, in site supervision and monitoring conveyor belt operations);
  • using the eyewear as a first-person camera to capture videos and photos for job-related purposes (in cases when there are no smart glasses, a small wearable camera suited for mounting on the helmet can be used for the same purpose);
  • using the screen as a navigation display for location (not suitable for underground mines).
To achieve the above targets via smart glasses, a special software package should be developed with these features to freely and securely exchange data with applications on the mobile phone.
The mobile software package is a portal that bridges all components of the system and stores data acquired from them for further processing and analysis. For the mobile software package of the proposed system, the Android Operating System (Android OS) by Google Inc. was selected, as the company also has an operating system for smartwatches called Android Wear. The smartwatch performs similar functions to the smartphone in terms of notifications and monitoring. However, as the watch also has an internal heart rate sensor, this is proposed as another health indicator featured by the system.
The application displays values for the entire system and provides notifications of risk events for the staff to monitor and manage. To evaluate the degree of engineering risk in a hazardous mining environment and facilitate greater interaction and awareness among the mine workers, alert notifications are divided into three modules: (1) notification of personal risk; (2) notification of risks in the area; and (3) notification of risks in other areas (neighborhoods) (see Figure 6).
The tasks include tracking the device to ensure the staff are not in risky situations (real-time proximity detection), checking the mining conditions (temperature, humidity, hazardous gas, and fume levels in the air), providing information on health indicators (heart pulse, body temperature, blood pressure), and, in case of emergency, providing an evacuation alert or initiating other accident prevention techniques. The system is expected to support various wireless technologies, such as RFID, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi to transmit the collected data from the sensors to the management-monitoring system.

4.3. Other Possible Applications

Other possible applications of wearable devices with sensors in mining are suggested in Table 2. In the multitasking environment of mining sites, operators and supervisors can benefit from the use of smartwatches as notification alert tools or communication gadgets to accomplish their work duties more effectively or report on important issues directly from their watches. With a specially developed software package for mining sites, smartwatches can also be used as terminals to show navigation information for logistics. In mines, if mining equipment needs to be repaired, which usually requires a long time and partly stops the mining operation, this can be carried by the site workforce using smart glasses. The mine worker has only to follow the instructions on the display. The eyewear gadgets can be used to continuously monitor conveyor belt operations, control task achievement, and even for site supervision.
In mining sites, wearable cameras can be applied for many purposes according to the characteristics of the mine operation. In underground mines, they can be used for dust monitoring, supply chain management, and safety monitoring. In outdoor environments, the cameras in most cases are useful tools for site supervision and process control. Nearly no smart clothing products are available on the market for the mining sector to wear in a workplace. However, attaching some biosensors to miners’ safety vests for health checks, radiation and gas sensors on the safety helmet, and a belt with unique proximity detection features can lead to a healthier workforce, provide a safer work environment, and, consequently, enhance the job satisfaction of the miners.
As most activity trackers have step counting and accelerometers, they can be useful in fall detection systems for emergency situations encountered by mine workers. Furthermore, the biosensors in the fitness trackers are well-suited to measure the daily health status of the staff, which prevents occupational disorders. At present, most wearable medical devices are used to log people’s activities and exercise regimens, and measure core biomedical data. However, some support an expanded range of possible measurements. For example, the remote monitoring of mine workers using wearable medical devices helps the early diagnosis of illnesses and timely treatment.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a review of wearable device technology and its potential deployment in the mining industry was conducted. It also suggested a wearable safety management system for miners and other possible applications to the mining industry. A few initiatives are underway to introduce wearable technology to mining. The successful utilization of these advanced devices in other sectors suggests that they can be used to provide practical solutions.
In mines around the globe, a lack of communication and safety issues frequently cause miners to experience life-long injuries and even death [55]. It was difficult to analyze actual mining environments due to the use of vague techniques and unpredictable mining conditions therein. However, the deployment of advanced technologies in the form of wearable devices can help regularly monitor the mining process, create a healthier and safer workplace, and improve the professionalism of personnel. If wearable technologies are successful in addressing the challenges of safety, occupational health, and communication at mining sites, there is potential for the conventional concept of a “hazardous mine” to evolve into a modern and safe “innovative workplace” featuring high efficiency and increased production. Therefore, wearable devices should be further used in the mining industry.
Some conditions need to be considered when proposing wearable device technology for mining. In the first, as electronic devices usually contain a variety of metals and chemical compounds, such as beryllium, cadmium, metal chromium, and lead, there is a risk of exposure and serious harm to users’ health [56]. The second features specific government regulations and rules in each country for the use of electronic devices in mining. Because of environments containing flammable materials, strict regulations are in place for the use of electronics in underground coal mines in most countries. According to the Occupational Health and Safety Act of Underground Mining Regulations in Canada, portable, flameproof electrical equipment can be installed if certified by an engineer 12 months before its first use at a mining site in zones with no risk of explosion (the equipment should be designed not to come into contact with coal dust below 150 °C), and can only be used by trained personnel [57]. In the US, the use of some electronic devices in mining sites is carried out after specific testing according to rules laid out by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) of the Department of Labor [58]. Similar restrictions apply to the use of signal apparatuses in underground mines in the Mines, Quarries, Works and Machinery Regulations of Botswana [59]. Although some restrictions are in place on the use of electronic devices in underground mines, the global mining community still thinks that the industry can benefit from technological advances in terms of efficiency and management [60,61,62,63,64].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by (1) Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01061290) and (2) Korea Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering Program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of Korea.

Author Contributions

Yosoon Choi conceived and designed the review; Mokhinabonu Mardonova collected and reviewed papers; Mokhinabonu Mardonova and Yosoon Choi wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wrzesińska, N. The use of smart glasses in healthcare—Review. MEDtube Sci. 2015, 3, 31–34. [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, B.; Hwang, S.; Lee, S.H. What drives construction workers’ acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace? Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health. Autom. Constr. 2017, 84, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Audi Uses Wearables in Logistics. Available online: https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/news/2016/11/Audi_Wearables.html (accessed on 5 February 2018).
  4. TECHZONE360. Available online: http://www.techzone360.com/topics/techzone/articles/2016/06/27 /422510-6-insurance-companies-investing-wearable-technology.htm# (accessed on 20 November 2017).
  5. Heintzman, N.D. A Digital Ecosystem of Diabetes Data and Technology: Services, Systems, and Tools Enabled by Wearables, Sensors, and Apps. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mercer, K.; Giangregorio, L.; Schneider, E.; Chilana, P.; Li, M.; Grindrod, K. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2016, 4, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chiauzzi, E.; Rodarte, C.; DasMahapatra, P. Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC Med. 2015, 13, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chan, M.; Estève, D.; Fourniols, J.-Y.; Escriba, C.; Campo, E. Smart wearable systems: Current status and future challenges. Artif. Intell. Med. 2012, 56, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Motion Metrics Partners with Vandrico to Develop Smartglass Application for Mining|Motion Metrics. Available online: http://www.motionmetrics.com/press/motion-metrics-partners-with-vandrico-to-develop-smartglass-application-for-mining/ (accessed on 1 February 2018).
  10. Hazarika, P. Implementation of smart safety helmet for coal mine workers. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, Delhi, India, 4–6 July 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deloitte Smart Helmet|Wearable Device|Vandrico Inc. Available online: https://vandrico.com/wearables/device/deloitte-smart-helmet (accessed on 1 February 2018).
  12. Fatigue-Monitoring Solution Implemented at Anglo Coal. Available online: http://www.miningweekly.com/article/fatigue-monitoring-solution-implemented-at-anglo-coal-2017-07-07/rep_id:3650 (accessed on 5 February 2018).
  13. Haas, E.J.; Cecala, A.B.; Hoebbel, C.L. Using Dust Assessment Technology to Leverage Mine Site Manager-Worker Communication and Health Behavior: A Longitudinal Case Study. J. Progress. Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 3, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Chatterjee, A.; Aceves, A.; Dungca, R.; Flores, H.; Giddens, K. Classification of wearable computing: A survey of electronic assistive technology and future design. In Proceedings of the 2016 Second International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN), Kolkata, India, 23–25 September 2016; pp. 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. International Electrotechnical Commission. Available online: http://www.iec.ch/about/brochures/pdf/technology/printed_electronics_lr.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2017).
  16. Khoa, T.V.A. Wearable Smart Technologies: New Era of Technology. Master’s Thesis, Lapland University of Applied Sciences, Lapland, Finland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Parate, A.; Ganesan, D. Detecting Eating and Smoking Behaviors Using Smartwatches. In Mobile Health; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 175–201. ISBN 978-3-319-51393-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cadmus-Bertram, L. Using Fitness Trackers in Clinical Research: What Nurse Practitioners Need to Know. J. Nurse Pract. 2017, 13, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fokkema, T.; Kooiman, T.J.M.; Krijnen, W.P.; Van Der Schans, C.P.; De Groot, M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers depend on walking speed. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2017, 49, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Evenson, K.R.; Goto, M.M.; Furberg, R.D. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shih, P.C.; Han, K.; Poole, E.S.; Rosson, M.B.; Carroll, J.M. Use and Adoption Challenges of Wearable Activity Trackers. In Proceedings of the iConference Proceedings 2015, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 24 March 2015; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson, E.C.; Verhagen, T.; Noordzij, M.L. Health empowerment through activity trackers: An empirical smart wristband study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 62, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wilson, M.; Ramsay, S.; Young, K.J. Engaging Overweight Adolescents in a Health and Fitness Program Using Wearable Activity Trackers. J. Pediatr. Health Care 2017, 31, e25–e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wearables.com. Available online: http://www.wearables.com/5-wearable-tech-pro-sports-micoach-zebra-catapult/ (accessed on 20 November 2017).
  25. Hanuska, A.; Chandramohan, B.; Bellamy, L.; Burke, P.; Ramanathan, R.; Balakrishnan, V. Smart Clothing Market Analysis, 2016. Smart-Clothing-Market-Analysis-Report.pdf. Available online: http://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/Smart-Clothing-Market-Analysis-Report.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2018).
  26. Borges, L.M.; Rente, A.; Velez, F.J.; Salvado, L.R.; Lebres, A.S.; Oliveira, J.M.; Araújo, P.; Ferro, J. Overview of progress in smart-clothing project for health monitoring and sport applications. In Proceedings of the 2008 1st International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, (ISABEL 2008), Aalborg, Denmark, 25–28 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
  27. Futuristic Firefighter Suit Has Sensors, Head-up Display—IEEE Spectrum. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/consumer-electronics/portable-devices/futuristic-firefighter-suit-has-sensors-headup-display (accessed on 5 February 2018).
  28. Teizer, J. Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: Self-Monitoring Alert and Reporting Technology for Hazard Avoidance and Training (SmartHat). J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2015, 20, 295–312. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mayton, B.; Dublon, G.; Palacios, S.; Paradiso, J.A. TRUSS: Tracking Risk with Ubiquitous Smart Sensing. Proc. IEEE Sens. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohd Rasli, M.K.A.; Madzhi, N.K.; Johari, J. Smart helmet with sensors for accident prevention. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and System Engineering (ICEESE 2013), Selangor, Malaysia, 4–5 December 2013; pp. 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thakre, K.; Waskar, P.; Sawant, P.; Naik, S.; Chandak, S. Smart Helmet. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 2015, 5, 408–410. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ozcan, K.; Velipasalar, S. Wearable Camera- and Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection on Portable Devices. IEEE Embed. Syst. Lett. 2016, 8, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Delabrida, S.E.; Dangelo, T.; Oliveira, R.A.R.; Loureiro, A.A.F. Towards a wearable device for monitoring ecological environments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC 2015), Foz do Iguacu, Brazil, 3–6 November 2015; pp. 148–153. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lymberis, A. Smart wearables for remote health monitoring, from prevention to rehabilitation: Current R&D, future challenges. In Proceedings of the Itab 2003: 4th International Ieee Embs Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, Conference Proceedings: New Solutions for New Challenges, Birmingham, UK, 24–26 April 2003; pp. 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Patel, S.; Park, H.; Bonato, P.; Chan, L.; Rodgers, M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 2012, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jones, K.W. Environmental Sensors. In Sensors Set: A Comprehensive Survey; Göpel, W., Hesse, J., Zemel, J.N., Eds.; Weinheim, Germany, 2008; Volume 8, pp. 451–489. ISBN 9783527620180. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wild, G.; Hinckley, S. Acousto-ultrasonic optical fiber sensors: Overview and state-of-the-art. IEEE Sens. J. 2008, 8, 1184–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yeo, T.L.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Fibre-optic sensor technologies for humidity and moisture measurement. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2008, 144, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Monošík, R.; Streďanský, M.; Šturdík, E. Biosensors—Classification, characterization and new trends. Acta Chim. Slov. 2012, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J. Electrochemical biosensors: Towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 21, 1887–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, H.; Peng, D.; Wang, W.; Sharif, H.; Chen, H.H.; Khoynezhad, A. Resource-aware secure ECG healthcare monitoring through body sensor networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2010, 17, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fletcher, R.R.; Kulkarni, S. Clip-on wireless wearable microwave sensor for ambulatory cardiac monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC’10, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010; pp. 365–369. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kung, H.T.; Vlah, D. Efficient location tracking using sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, New Orleans, LA, USA, 16–20 March 2003; Volume 3, pp. 1954–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xie, X.; Ma, W.-Y. Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web—WWW ’09, Madrid, Spain, 20–24 April 2009; p. 791. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, X.; Biagioni, J.; Eriksson, J.; Wang, Y.; Forman, G.; Zhu, Y. Mining large-scale, sparse GPS traces for map inference. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining—KDD ’12, Beijing, China, 12–16 August 2012; p. 669. [Google Scholar]
  46. Johnson, L. GPS in mining. Min. Mag. 1998, 178, 387–389. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yin, P.; Ye, M.; Lee, W.C.; Li, Z. Mining GPS data for trajectory recommendation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 8444 (LNAI), pp. 50–61. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wahlström, N.; Gustafsson, F. Magnetometer modeling and validation for tracking metallic targets. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2014, 62, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, K.; Shin, H.; Cha, H. Smartphone-based pedestrian tracking in indoor corridor environments. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2013, 17, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, H.; Stone, T.; Hu, H.; Harris, N. Use of multiple wearable inertial sensors in upper limb motion tracking. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yun, X.; Bachmann, E.R. Design, Implementation, and Experimental Results of a Quaternion-Based Kalman Filter for Human Body Motion Tracking. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2006, 22, 1216–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baek, J.; Choi, Y.; Lee, C.; Suh, J.; Lee, S. BBUNS: Bluetooth Beacon-Based Underground Navigation System to Support Mine Haulage Operations. Minerals 2017, 7, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chisholm, J. Respirable dust and respirable silica concentrations from construction activities. Indoor Built Environ. 1999, 8, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Verma, D.K.; Rajhans, G.S.; Malik, O.P.; Des Tombe, K. Respirable dust and respirable silica exposure in Ontario gold mines. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2014, 11, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X. Mine safety information technology in the framework of Digital Mine. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 846–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Greenpeace Toxic Tech: The dangerous chemicals in electronic products. Greenpeace Brief. 2014, 7, 1–21.
  57. Underground Mining Regulations—Occupational Health and Safety Act (Nova Scotia). Available online: https://novascotia.ca/just/regulations/regs/ohsmine.htm#TOC2_190 (accessed on 2 February 2018).
  58. Mine Safety and Health Administration-MSHA. Available online: https://arlweb.msha.gov/regs/30cfr/ (accessed on 12 January 2018).
  59. Mines, Quarries, Works and Machinery: Subsidiary Legislation. Government of Botswana, 1978. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/12921/94916/F1585757103/BWA12921.pdf (accessed on 17 January 2018).
  60. Solomon, F.; Katz, E.; Lovel, R. Social dimensions of mining: Research, policy and practice challenges for the minerals industry in Australia. Resour. Policy 2008, 33, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Humphreys, D. Sustainable development: Can the mining industry afford it? Resour. Policy 2001, 27, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qiuping, W.; Shunbing, Z.; Chunquan, D. Study on Key Technologies of Internet of Things Perceiving Mine. Procedia Eng. 2011, 26, 2326–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Laurence, D. Establishing a sustainable mining operation: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Worrall, R.; Neil, D.; Brereton, D.; Mulligan, D. Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 1426–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Environmental sensors and their parts: (a) light sensor; (b) sound sensor; (c) humidity sensor; (d) flame sensor; (e) fume sensor.
Figure 1. Environmental sensors and their parts: (a) light sensor; (b) sound sensor; (c) humidity sensor; (d) flame sensor; (e) fume sensor.
Energies 11 00547 g001
Figure 2. Optical biosensors: (a) electrocardiogram (ECG) heart-monitoring sensor; (b) finger-clip heart rate sensor.
Figure 2. Optical biosensors: (a) electrocardiogram (ECG) heart-monitoring sensor; (b) finger-clip heart rate sensor.
Energies 11 00547 g002
Figure 3. Location-tracking sensors: (a) global positioning system (GPS) module; (b) 6-axis accelerometer and compass; (c) digital compass.
Figure 3. Location-tracking sensors: (a) global positioning system (GPS) module; (b) 6-axis accelerometer and compass; (c) digital compass.
Energies 11 00547 g003
Figure 4. Wearable technology-integrated embedded wearable safety communication system.
Figure 4. Wearable technology-integrated embedded wearable safety communication system.
Energies 11 00547 g004
Figure 5. Proposed embedded wearable system shown at a mining site: (a) sensor-equipped mine safety vest; (b) miner wearing Recon Jet Smart Eyewear; (c) miner using Epson Moverio BT-2200; (d) sensor-equipped safety helmet; (e) smartwatch.
Figure 5. Proposed embedded wearable system shown at a mining site: (a) sensor-equipped mine safety vest; (b) miner wearing Recon Jet Smart Eyewear; (c) miner using Epson Moverio BT-2200; (d) sensor-equipped safety helmet; (e) smartwatch.
Energies 11 00547 g005
Figure 6. Group management and improved risk awareness among miners.
Figure 6. Group management and improved risk awareness among miners.
Energies 11 00547 g006
Table 1. Classification of wearable technologies, along with their properties, capabilities, and sectors of application.
Table 1. Classification of wearable technologies, along with their properties, capabilities, and sectors of application.
TypePropertiesCapabilitiesApplications
Smartwatch-low operating power
-user-friendly interface with both touch and voice commands
-displays specific information
-payment
-fitness/activity tracking
-communication
-navigation
-business, administration
-marketing, insurance
-professional sport, training
-education
-infotainment
Smart eyewear-controlled by touching the screen, head movement, voice command, and hand shake
-low operating power
-sends sound directly to the ear
-visualization
-language interpretation
-communication
-task coordination
-surgery
-aerospace and defense
-logistics
-education
-infotainment
Fitness tracker-high accuracy
-waterproof
-lightweight
-wireless communication
-physiological wellness
-navigation
-fitness/activity tracking
-heart rate monitor
-fitness
-healthcare
-professional sport
-outdoor/indoor sport
Smart clothing-no visual interaction with user via display or screen
-data are obtained by body sensors and actuators
-heart rate, daily activities, temperature, and body position tracking
-heating or cooling the body
automatic payment
-professional sport-fitness
-medicine
-military
-logistics
Wearable camera-making first-person capture
attachable on clothes or body
-smaller dimensions
-night vision
-captures real-time first-person photos and videos
-live streaming
-fitness/activity tracking
-defense
-fitness
-industry
-education
Wearable medical device-pain management
-physiological tracking
-glucose monitoring
-sleep monitoring
-brain activity monitoring
-cardiovascular diseases
-physiological disorders
-chronic diseases; diabetes
-surgery
-neuroscience
-dermatology
-rehabilitation
-fitness
-cardiovascular medicine
-psychiatry
-surgery
-oncology
-dermatology
-respirology
Table 2. Possible applications of wearable devices and sensors in the mining industry.
Table 2. Possible applications of wearable devices and sensors in the mining industry.
Wearable DeviceSensorApplication
S.W. 1S.E. 2W.C. 3S.C. 4F.T. 5M.W.D. 6
IMU 7 sensor, control sensor, IR 8 sensormining equipment management
camera sensor, navigation module, accelerometer, speed sensor, magnetometer, position sensortransport and logistics management
proximity/motion sensor, ultrasonic sensor, IR sensor, camera sensorprocess monitoring & reporting
camera sensor, control sensor, navigation module, IMU sensorsite supervision
supply chain management
task achievement monitoring
conveyor belt monitoring
camera sensor, IMU sensor, navigation modulelabor education and training
emergency preparedness
communication module, camera sensorcommunication & data management
camera sensor, motion/proximity sensor, temperature sensor, humidity sensor, gas sensor, air pressure sensor, radiation sensorrisk and change management
operational safety monitoring
mine rescue training/operations
pulse rate sensor, ECG 9 sensor, EEG 10 sensor, body temperature sensor, sound sensor, blood pressure sensor, glucose level sensor, exhalation sensoroccupational health monitoring
occupational disease prevention
camera sensor, dust sensor, humidity sensordust monitoring
camera sensor, sound sensornoise monitoring
temperature sensor, gas/fume sensor, humidity sensor, exhalation sensorair flow monitoring (ventilation)
light sensor, camera sensor, control sensorfacility management (lights, pump etc.)
mine equipment service and maintenance
1 S.W.—smartwatch; 2 S.E.—smart eyewear; 3 W.C.—wearable cameras; 4 S.C.—smart clothing; 5 F.T.—fitness trackers; 6 M.W.D.—medical wearable devices; 7 IMU sensor—inertial measurement unit sensor; 8 IR—infrared receiver sensor; 9 ECG—electrocardiogram; 10 EEG—electroencephalogram.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mardonova, M.; Choi, Y. Review of Wearable Device Technology and Its Applications to the Mining Industry. Energies 2018, 11, 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030547

AMA Style

Mardonova M, Choi Y. Review of Wearable Device Technology and Its Applications to the Mining Industry. Energies. 2018; 11(3):547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030547

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mardonova, Mokhinabonu, and Yosoon Choi. 2018. "Review of Wearable Device Technology and Its Applications to the Mining Industry" Energies 11, no. 3: 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030547

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop