Expected Global Warming Impacts on the Spatial Distribution and Productivity for 2050 of Five Species of Trees Used in the Wood Energy Supply Chain in France
Abstract
:1. Context and Problematic
2. Material and Methods
- A model to assess the spatial distribution of the most suitable areas, for the current (2015) and future (2050) climate situations, related to the climatic behavior of the selected tree species; and
- A model of the Net Primary Productivity (NPP) proposed by Leith [13] to assess its variation towards 2050 and for the identification of the potential risk on biomass availability.
2.1. Model of Suitable Areas Assessment for Plant Growth
- The effect of an ecological factor on a plant’s frequency follows a unimodal trend, defining an optimum frequency of plant occurrences in a portion of the range of a climatic variable;
- the effect of an environmental factor on a plant is gradual, even if the distribution of the plant in the range of the climatic variable is intermittent; and
- a plant is a better indicator of an environmental factor if its occurrences are concentrated in a specific portion of the range of the climatic variable. In other words, if two plants are distributed in the same range of a climatic variable, the most indicative one shows the highest frequencies at one or more levels of the range.
- Silver fir may have a decrease of 29% of the total amount of its suitable areas, with a decrease of 61% in high probable areas and a decrease of 64% in average probabilities. There could be an increase of 63% of low probabilities to find suitable areas for this tree. This result underlines a risk of reduction of the areas of this tree and a potential risk of stress in the locations where this species is observed currently and should not find a high level of probabilities of suitable areas in 2050;
- Scots pine and beech may have a low decrease of their amount of suitable areas (−11% and −7%). However, this decrease would affect only high probabilities to find suitable areas for these taxa. A potential increase of the average of low probabilities could be possible in the future. These results attest a risk for these trees in terms of stress in the areas where the probabilities to find a suitable environment may decrease in the future;
- Spruce may have a significant decrease (−53%) of its probabilities to find suitable areas in 2050, especially for high and average probabilities (−58% and −71%, respectively), which could underline a high risk for this species to expand and to grow in the half part of its current distribution; and
- Italian poplar could have a little decrease (−8%) of the potential suitable areas, but this reduction should affect only low and average probabilities. This tree may have an increase of its high probabilities (+11%) to find suitable areas that may compensate the decline of some probabilities of occurrence.
2.2. Model of Net Primary Productivity Assessment
3. Results and Discussion on the Potential Development and Use of the Five Tree Species for Energy Purpose within 2050
- Abies alba Mill. (Silver fir), Fagus sylvatica L. (Beech), and Pinus silvestris L. (Scots pine): These three species should have around 90% of their plots distributed in very low and low BDI classes. They would have, respectively, 10%, 7%, and 6% of their plots that should be located into the highest classes of the BDI in 2050 (high and very high probabilities of development and productivity of forest);
- Picea excelsa (Lam.) Lk. (Spruce): This tree should have around 80% of its plots distributed in very low and low BDI classes in 2050 and 21% of its plots distributed into high and very high levels of BDI; and
- Populus nigra L. (Italian poplar): This tree should have around 95% of its plots located into areas with a slightly low or a medium probability of development and productivity of forest (BDI levels 3 and 4) in 2050. Unlike the other four tree species, Italian poplar should have less than 2% of its plots located into high levels of BDI in 2050, which would represent a significant issue for the development and use of such a species for energy purposes.
4. Conclusions and Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cavaud, D.; Coléou, Z.; Guggemos, F.; Reynaud, D. Chiffres clés des énergies renouvelables; Service de l’observation et des statistiques (SOeS): Nancy, France, 2017; p. 76. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- CIBE. Retour sur la saison de chauffe: bilan sur l’approvisionnement. Enjeux et perspectives: Recensement des installations, Bilan du Fond Chaleur, Valorisation des cendres; Comité interprofessionnel du Bois Energie (CIBE): Paris, French, 2017; p. 22. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- IGN. La forêt française: Etat des lieux et évolutions récentes. Panorama des résultats de l’inventaire forestier; Institution National de L’information Geographique et Forestiere: Paris, French, 2018; p. 56. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Talandier, M.; Jousseaume, V.; Nicot, B.-H. Two centuries of economic territorial dynamics: The case of France. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 2016, 3, 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Part B: Regional Aspects; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; p. 696. [Google Scholar]
- Woodward, F.I. Climate and Plant Distribution; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1987; p. 174. [Google Scholar]
- Ozenda, P.; Borel, J.-L. An Ecological Map of Europe: Why and How? C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II Sci. Vie 2000, 323, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thuiller, W.; Lavorel, S.; Sykes, M.T.; Araújo, M.B. Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbolino, E.; Daniel, W.; Hinojos Mendoza, G.; Sanseverino-Godfrin, V. Anticipating climate change effect on biomass productivity and vegetation structure of Mediterranean Forests to promote the sustainability of the wood energy supply chain. In Proceedings of the 25th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–15 June 2017; pp. 17–29. [Google Scholar]
- Barney, J.N.; Di Tomaso, J.M. Bioclimatic predictions of habitat suitability for the biofuel switchgrass in North America under current and future climate scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellarby, J.; Wattenbach, M.; Tuck, G.; Glendining, M.J.; Smith, P. The potential distribution of bioenergy crops in the UK under present and future climate. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 1935–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuck, G.; Glendining, M.J.; Smith, P.; House, J.I.; Wattenbach, M. The potential distribution of bioenergy crops in Europeunder present and future climate. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lieth, H. Modelling the primary productivity of the world, nature and resources. Indian For. 1972, 98, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
- Garbolino, E.; De Ruffray, P.; Brisse, H.; Grandjouan, G. Relationships between plants and climate in France: Calibration of 1874 bio-indicators. C. R. Biol. 2007, 330, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbolino, E. Les bio-indicateurs du climat: Principes et caractérisation; Presses des MINES: Paris, French, 2014; p. 129. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Garbolino, E.; Sanseverino-Godfrin, V.; Hinojos-Mendoza, G. Describing and predicting of the vegetation development of Corsica due to expected climate change and its impact on forest fire risk evolution. Saf. Sci. 2016, 88, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbayes, H.R. Les conifères introduits en Bretagne. Penn Ar Bed 1966, 46, 262–274. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Pourtet, J.; Duchaufour, P.; Duval, A. Notes forestières sur la Bretagne et le Cotentin; Ecole Nationale des Eaux et des Forêts: Nancy, France, 1947; p. 51. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Ciais, P.; Reichstein, M.; Viovy, N.; Granier, A.; Ogeé, J.; Allard, V.; Aubinet, M.; Buchmann, N.; Bernhofer, C.; Carrara, A.; et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 2005, 437, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fink, A.H.; Brücher, T.; Krüger, A.; Leckebusch, G.C.; Pinto, J.G.; Ulbrich, U. The 2003 European summer heatwaves and drought? Synoptic diagnosis and impacts. Weather 2004, 59, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reichstein, M. Severe Impact of the 2003 European Heat Wave on Ecosystems. Available online: https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/archive/2005/severe-impact-of-the-2003-european-heat-wave-on-ecosystems (accessed on 20 April 2018).
- Niu, S.; Luo, Y.; Li, D.; Cao, S.; Xia, J.; Li, J.; Smithe, M.D. Plant growth and mortality under climatic extremes: An overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 8, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, E.M. The Role of Land–Atmosphere Interactions for European Summer Heat Waves: Past, Present and Future. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lindner, M.; Fitzgerald, J.B.; Zimmermann, N.E.; Reyer, C.; Delzon, S.; van der Maaten, E.; Schelhaas, M.J.; Lasch, P.; Eggers, J.; van der Maaten-Theunissen, M.; et al. Climate change and European forests: What do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 146, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez-Salguero, R.; Camarero, J.J.; Gutiérrez, E.; González Rouco, F.; Gazol, A.; Sangüesa-Barreda, G.; Andreu-Hayles, L.; Linares, J.C.; Seftigen, K. Assessing forest vulnerability to climate warming using a process-based model of tree growth: Bad prospects for rear-edges. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 2705–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Favre, C.-M.; Renaud, J.-P. Réseau systématique de suivi des dommages forestiers. Observations de la campagne 2006. Available online: https://www.google.com.sg/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjZtdrTlPneAhVIw7wKHfoaDZEQFjAAegQICRAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fagriculture.gouv.fr%2Ftelecharger%2F45428%3Ftoken%3D09f7c633f8ded65b4263945ce104bd02&usg=AOvVaw3612bwWdfN8PPS1fLJDtlJ (accessed on 29 October 2018).
- Lebourgeois, F.; Gomez, N.; Pinto, P.; Mérian, P. Mixed stands reduce Abies alba tree-ring sensitivity to summer drought in the Vosges mountains, western Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 303, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cailleret, M.; Dvi, H. Effects of climate on diameter growth of co-occurring Fagus sylvatica and Abies alba along an altitudinal gradient. Trees 2011, 25, 265–276. [Google Scholar]
- IGN. The Role of Fench Forests and the Forestry Sector in Climate-Change Mitigation. Opportunities and Deadblocks by 2050. Summary of a Case Study Conducted by INRA and IGN for the Ministry of Agriculture and Food—June 2017. Available online: https://inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/IMG/pdf/419860-c1d9a-resource-etude-forets-bois-changement-climatique-resume-anglais.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2018).
- Lempereur, M.; Martin-StPaul, N.K.; Damesin, C.; Joffre, R.; Ourcival, J.M.; Rocheteau, A.; Rambal, S. Growth duration is a better predictor of stem increment than carbon supply in a Mediterranean oak forest: Implications for assessing forest productivity under climate change. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.B.; Pulkki, R.; Shahi, C.; Upadhyay, T.P. Economic Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains: A Case Study of Four Competing Bioenergy Power Plants in Northwestern Ontario. ISRN Renew. Energy 2012, 2012, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Meyer, A.; Cattrysse, D.; Rasinmäki, J.; Van Orshoven, J. Methods to optimize the design and management of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 31, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edel, M.; Thraen, D. The Economic Viability of Wood Energy Conversion Technologies in Germany. Int. J. For. Eng. 2012, 23, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eliasson, L.; Eriksson, A.; Mohtashami, S. Analysis of factors affecting productivity and costs for a high-performance chip supply system. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, R.L.; English, B.C.; Noon, C.E. A Geographic Information System-based modeling system for evaluating the cost of delivered energy crop feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 18, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamimura, K.; Kuboyama, H.; Yamamoto, K. Wood biomass supply costs and potential for biomass energy plants in Japan. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 36, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, P.; Sgobbi, A.; Nijs, W.; Thiel, C. The JRC-EU-TIMES Model. Bioenergy Potentials for EU and Neighbouring Countries; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; p. 172. [Google Scholar]
- Viana, H.; Cohen, W.B.; Lopes, D.; Aranha, J. Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS-based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fired power plants in Portugal. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 2551–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abatzoglou, J.T.; Williams, A.P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11770–11775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keenan, R.J. Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: A review. Ann. For. Sci. 2015, 72, 145–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Abies alba | Amount of IFN plots= | 3931 |
Proba. classes | IFN plots in proba. classes | % IFN plots in proba. classes |
low proba | 29 | 1 |
average proba | 371 | 9 |
high proba | 3531 | 90 |
Fagus sylvatica | Amount of IFN plots= | 6825 |
Proba. classes | IFN plots in proba. classes | % IFN plots in proba. classes |
low proba | 31 | 0 |
average proba | 592 | 9 |
high proba | 6202 | 91 |
Picea excelsa | Amount of IFN plots= | 4378 |
Proba classes | IFN plots in proba. classes | % IFN plots in proba. classes |
low proba | 148 | 3 |
average proba | 1144 | 26 |
high proba | 3086 | 70 |
Pinus silvestris | Amount of IFN plots= | 3217 |
Proba. classes | IFN plots in proba. classes | % IFN plots in proba. classes |
low proba | 57 | 2 |
average proba | 823 | 26 |
high proba | 2337 | 73 |
Populus nigra | Amount of IFN plots= | 1962 |
Proba. classes | IFN plots in proba. classes | % IFN plots in proba. classes |
low proba | 0 | 0 |
average proba | 632 | 32 |
high proba | 1330 | 68 |
Abies alba | 2015 | 2050 | diff | diff % |
all classes 2015 | 643,868 | 455,297 | −188,571 | −29 |
low proba | 173,813 | 283,478 | 109,665 | 63 |
average proba | 353,171 | 126,359 | −226,812 | −64 |
high proba | 116,884 | 45,460 | −71,424 | −61 |
Fagus sylvatica | 2015 | 2050 | diff | diff % |
all classes 2015 | 734,287 | 650,278 | −84,009 | −11 |
low proba | 152,052 | 166,362 | 14,310 | 9 |
average proba | 341,095 | 390,912 | 49,817 | 15 |
high proba | 241,140 | 93,004 | −148,136 | −61 |
Picea excelsa | 2015 | 2050 | diff | diff % |
all classes 2015 | 465,780 | 217,597 | −248,183 | −53 |
low proba | 224,312 | 136,329 | −87,983 | −39 |
average proba | 159,495 | 46 859 | −112,636 | −71 |
high proba | 81,973 | 34,409 | −47,564 | −58 |
Pinus silvestris | 2015 | 2050 | diff | diff % |
all classes 2015 | 740,099 | 689,576 | −50,523 | −7 |
low proba | 168,819 | 190,661 | 21,842 | 13 |
average proba | 362,532 | 410,182 | 47,650 | 13 |
high proba | 208,748 | 88,733 | −120,015 | −57 |
Populus nigra | 2015 | 2050 | diff | diff % |
all classes 2015 | 738,069 | 679,247 | −58,822 | −8 |
low proba | 41,393 | 29,481 | −11,912 | −29 |
average proba | 264,039 | 168,343 | −95,696 | −36 |
high proba | 432,637 | 481,423 | 48,786 | 11 |
NPP | Amount of Plots = | 795,616 |
---|---|---|
Classes of difference | plots | % of plots |
[−121, −1] | 738,465 | 92.8 |
[−1, 1] | 453 | 0.1 |
[1, 180] | 56,698 | 7.1 |
BDI Values | Abies alba | Fagus sylvatica | Picea excelsa | Pinus silvestris | Populus nigra | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
plots | % δ% | plots | % δ% | plots | % δ% | plots | % δ% | plots | % δ% | |
1 | 283,478 | 62 ± 12 | 478,056 | 74 ± 25 | 136,210 | 63 ± 7 | 189,093 | 27 ± 8 | 10,469 | 2 |
2 | 124,027 | 27 ± 5 | 111,565 | 17 ± 6 | 35,422 | 16 ± 2 | 408,326 | 59 ± 18 | 242,894 | 36 ± 7 |
3 | 5077 | 1 | 14,962 | 2 ± 1 | 287 | <1 | 47,927 | 7 ± 2 | 415,789 | 61 ± 12 |
4 | 90 | <1 | 39 | <1 | 342 | <1 | 17 | <1 | 333 | <1 |
6 | 2494 | 1 | 4543 | 1 | 11,127 | 5 ± 1 | 1 153 | <1 | 9604 | 1 |
9 | 40,131 | 9 ± 2 | 41,113 | 6 ± 2 | 34,209 | 16 ± 2 | 43,060 | 6 ± 2 | 158 | <1 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garbolino, E.; Daniel, W.; Hinojos Mendoza, G. Expected Global Warming Impacts on the Spatial Distribution and Productivity for 2050 of Five Species of Trees Used in the Wood Energy Supply Chain in France. Energies 2018, 11, 3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123372
Garbolino E, Daniel W, Hinojos Mendoza G. Expected Global Warming Impacts on the Spatial Distribution and Productivity for 2050 of Five Species of Trees Used in the Wood Energy Supply Chain in France. Energies. 2018; 11(12):3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123372
Chicago/Turabian StyleGarbolino, Emmanuel, Warren Daniel, and Guillermo Hinojos Mendoza. 2018. "Expected Global Warming Impacts on the Spatial Distribution and Productivity for 2050 of Five Species of Trees Used in the Wood Energy Supply Chain in France" Energies 11, no. 12: 3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123372