Next Article in Journal
Effects of Mixture Stratification on Combustion and Emissions of Boosted Controlled Auto-Ignition Engines
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution of the Baltic Sea Near-Shore Wave Power Potential along the Coast of Klaipėda, Lithuania
 
 
Article

Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model

1
Independent Researcher, Novi, MI 48377, USA
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504, USA
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Rd., Shanghai 200240, China
4
National Engineering Laboratory for Electric Vehicles and Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2017, 10(12), 2174; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122174
Received: 17 November 2017 / Revised: 5 December 2017 / Accepted: 12 December 2017 / Published: 19 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section D: Energy Storage and Application)
Researchers are in search of parameters inside Li-ion batteries that can be utilized to control their external behavior. Physics-based electrochemical model could bridge the gap between Li+ transportation and distribution inside battery and battery performance outside. In this paper, two commercially available Li-ion anode materials: graphite and Lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12 or LTO) were selected and a physics-based electrochemical model was developed based on half-cell assembly and testing. It is found that LTO has a smaller diffusion coefficient (Ds) than graphite, which causes a larger overpotential, leading to a smaller capacity utilization and, correspondingly, a shorter duration of constant current charge or discharge. However, in large current applications, LTO performs better than graphite because its effective particle radius decreases with increasing current, leading to enhanced diffusion. In addition, LTO has a higher activation overpotential in its side reactions; its degradation rate is expected to be much smaller than graphite, indicating a longer life span. View Full-Text
Keywords: Li-ion battery; anode materials; half-cell modeling Li-ion battery; anode materials; half-cell modeling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, R.; Zhou, X.; Fan, H.; Blaisdell, D.; Jagadale, A.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, R. Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model. Energies 2017, 10, 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122174

AMA Style

Fu R, Zhou X, Fan H, Blaisdell D, Jagadale A, Zhang X, Xiong R. Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model. Energies. 2017; 10(12):2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Rujian, Xuan Zhou, Hengbin Fan, Douglas Blaisdell, Ajay Jagadale, Xi Zhang, and Rui Xiong. 2017. "Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model" Energies 10, no. 12: 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122174

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop