Next Article in Journal
Towards Efficient Energy Management of Smart Buildings Exploiting Heuristic Optimization with Real Time and Critical Peak Pricing Schemes
Previous Article in Journal
A New Model for Describing the Rheological Behavior of Heavy and Extra Heavy Crude Oils in the Presence of Nanoparticles
Review

Insertion of Mono- vs. Bi- vs. Trivalent Atoms in Prospective Active Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Batteries: An ab Initio Perspective

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Block EA #07-08, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2017, 10(12), 2061; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061
Received: 30 October 2017 / Revised: 29 November 2017 / Accepted: 30 November 2017 / Published: 5 December 2017
Rational design of active electrode materials is important for the development of advanced lithium and post-lithium batteries. Ab initio modeling can provide mechanistic understanding of the performance of prospective materials and guide design. We review our recent comparative ab initio studies of lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, and aluminum interactions with different phases of several actively experimentally studied electrode materials, including monoelemental materials carbon, silicon, tin, and germanium, oxides TiO2 and VxOy as well as sulphur-based spinels MS2 (M = transition metal). These studies are unique in that they provided reliable comparisons, i.e., at the same level of theory and using the same computational parameters, among different materials and among Li, Na, K, Mg, and Al. Specifically, insertion energetics (related to the electrode voltage) and diffusion barriers (related to rate capability), as well as phononic effects, are compared. These studies facilitate identification of phases most suitable as anode or cathode for different types of batteries. We highlight the possibility of increasing the voltage, or enabling electrochemical activity, by amorphization and p-doping, of rational choice of phases of oxides to maximize the insertion potential of Li, Na, K, Mg, Al, as well as of rational choice of the optimum sulfur-based spinel for Mg and Al insertion, based on ab initio calculations. Some methodological issues are also addressed, including construction of effective localized basis sets, applications of Hubbard correction, generation of amorphous structures, and the use of a posteriori dispersion corrections. View Full-Text
Keywords: lithium ion battery; sodium ion battery; potassium ion battery; magnesium ion battery; aluminum ion battery; intercalation; diffusion; ab initio modeling; energy storage lithium ion battery; sodium ion battery; potassium ion battery; magnesium ion battery; aluminum ion battery; intercalation; diffusion; ab initio modeling; energy storage
Show Figures

Figure 1

  • Externally hosted supplementary file 1
    Doi: N/A
    Link: http://N/A
    Description: permissions to reuse some figures
MDPI and ACS Style

Kulish, V.V.; Koch, D.; Manzhos, S. Insertion of Mono- vs. Bi- vs. Trivalent Atoms in Prospective Active Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Batteries: An ab Initio Perspective. Energies 2017, 10, 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061

AMA Style

Kulish VV, Koch D, Manzhos S. Insertion of Mono- vs. Bi- vs. Trivalent Atoms in Prospective Active Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Batteries: An ab Initio Perspective. Energies. 2017; 10(12):2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulish, Vadym V., Daniel Koch, and Sergei Manzhos. 2017. "Insertion of Mono- vs. Bi- vs. Trivalent Atoms in Prospective Active Electrode Materials for Electrochemical Batteries: An ab Initio Perspective" Energies 10, no. 12: 2061. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop