Next Article in Journal
Operation Optimization of Steam Accumulators as Thermal Energy Storage and Buffer Units
Previous Article in Journal
Risk Assessment Method of UHV AC/DC Power System under Serious Disasters
Open AccessArticle

Thermo-Economic Comparison and Parametric Optimizations among Two Compressed Air Energy Storage System Based on Kalina Cycle and ORC

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Antonio Calvo Hernández
Energies 2017, 10(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010015
Received: 25 September 2016 / Revised: 12 December 2016 / Accepted: 14 December 2016 / Published: 23 December 2016
The compressed air energy storage (CAES) system, considered as one method for peaking shaving and load-levelling of the electricity system, has excellent characteristics of energy storage and utilization. However, due to the waste heat existing in compressed air during the charge stage and exhaust gas during the discharge stage, the efficient operation of the conventional CAES system has been greatly restricted. The Kalina cycle (KC) and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) have been proven to be two worthwhile technologies to fulfill the different residual heat recovery for energy systems. To capture and reuse the waste heat from the CAES system, two systems (the CAES system combined with KC and ORC, respectively) are proposed in this paper. The sensitivity analysis shows the effect of the compression ratio and the temperature of the exhaust on the system performance: the KC-CAES system can achieve more efficient operation than the ORC-CAES system under the same temperature of exhaust gas; meanwhile, the larger compression ratio can lead to the higher efficiency for the KC-CAES system than that of ORC-CAES with the constant temperature of the exhaust gas. In addition, the evolutionary multi-objective algorithm is conducted between the thermodynamic and economic performances to find the optimal parameters of the two systems. The optimum results indicate that the solutions with an exergy efficiency of around 59.74% and 53.56% are promising for KC-CAES and ORC-CAES system practical designs, respectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: integrated energy storage system; CAES; Kalina cycle; ORC; thermo-economic integrated energy storage system; CAES; Kalina cycle; ORC; thermo-economic
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, R.; Wang, H.; Yao, E.; Zhang, S. Thermo-Economic Comparison and Parametric Optimizations among Two Compressed Air Energy Storage System Based on Kalina Cycle and ORC. Energies 2017, 10, 15.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop