Next Article in Journal
Systematic Review of Laryngeal Fractures and Trends in Operative Management
Previous Article in Journal
Complicated Facial Lacerations: Challenges in the Repair and Management of Complications by a Facial Trauma Team
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent

by
Krishan Sarna
1,2,*,
Tom Mulama Osundwa
1,2,
Martin Kamau
1,2 and
Khushboo Jayant Sonigra
1,2
1
Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 30197-00100, Kenya
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2023, 16(1), 55-61; https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221077005
Submission received: 1 November 2021 / Revised: 1 December 2021 / Accepted: 1 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022

Abstract

Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional. Objective: To establish anthropometric norms and test the validity of four neoclassical canons among Kenyans of Indian descent. Methods: Using direct anthropometric landmarks, 3 vertical and 4 horizontal measurements were made on the faces of 130 adult Kenyans of Indian descent. The mean of each anthropometric measurement was calculated and a student t-test was used to identify significant gender differences. These results were compared to four neoclassical canons and the percentage of each canon and its variants were recorded. A chi-square test was then performed to assess any gender differences between these findings. Results: When comparing sexes, the anthropometric means of males were larger than those of females except for eye fissure length. In addition, only the upper third displayed sexual dimorphism. As for the neoclassical canons, the orbital canon was found to apply to 20.0% of males and 21.6% of females, followed by the naso-oral canon found in 16.4% of males and 17.6% of females, and the orbito-nasal canon present in 14.5% of males and 18.9% of females. The vertical canon was not found to be applicable to any participant. Conclusion: The facial morphometricmeasurements in this population differ from the described neoclassical canons since they do not apply to the majority of these individuals. Therefore surgeons should be guided by the observed populationspecific differences during reconstructive and facial aesthetic surgery.
Keywords: anthropometry; proportions; neoclassical canons; Indian Kenyans; normative values anthropometry; proportions; neoclassical canons; Indian Kenyans; normative values

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarna, K.; Osundwa, T.M.; Kamau, M.; Sonigra, K.J. Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2023, 16, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221077005

AMA Style

Sarna K, Osundwa TM, Kamau M, Sonigra KJ. Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2023; 16(1):55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221077005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarna, Krishan, Tom Mulama Osundwa, Martin Kamau, and Khushboo Jayant Sonigra. 2023. "Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 16, no. 1: 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221077005

APA Style

Sarna, K., Osundwa, T. M., Kamau, M., & Sonigra, K. J. (2023). Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 16(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221077005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop