Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant, Anti-α-Glucosidase, Antityrosinase, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Bioactive Components from Morus alba
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Supplementing Sea Buckthorn Leaves (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) and Chromium (III) in Broiler Diet on the Nutritional Quality and Lipid Oxidative Stability of Meat
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/antiox11112219
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Induced Toxicity in Rats

by
Sevgi Gençosman
1,*,
Deniz Ceylanlı
1,
Ahmet Özer Şehirli
2,
Kerem Teralı
3,
Furkan Bölükbaşı
4,
Şule Çetinel
4 and
Serkan Sayıner
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
2
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
3
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Cyprus International University, 99258 Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
4
Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, 34722 İstanbul, Turkey
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(11), 2219; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112219
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 2 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a chemotherapeutic agent involved in the treatment regimens for several malignancies such as colorectal cancer. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent used in the treatment of several diseases related to oxidative stress and inflammation. This study aimed at investigating whether NAC provides protection against hepatorenal and gastrointestinal tissue damage induced by CPT-11. Thirty-two Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups as control, NAC, CPT-11, and CPT-11+NAC. Following the experimental period, blood, and tissue samples (liver, kidney, stomach, and small intestine) were collected, and biochemical indicators, together with pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels were evaluated. Both the biochemical indicators and the pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMP, and MDA levels increased in animals treated with CPT-11, while SOD and GPx activities decreased. Histopathological evaluation revealed structural damage in all examined tissues. With NAC administration, significant improvements were observed, both biochemically and histologically. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that NAC treatment together with CPT-11 may have a beneficial effect on reducing CPT-11 toxicity in rats, by modulating inflammation and the oxidant–antioxidant balance. These results strongly promote further investigative studies.

1. Introduction

Globally, cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality. Chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) are currently the most effective and comprehensive approaches for cancer treatment [1]. However, they are known to have many adverse side effects, such as oral mucositis, gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hematopoietic system damage, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity, and for these reasons their clinical use is limited [2,3,4]. These adverse effects generally reduce the quality of life and cause tapering of therapy in cancer patients. Therefore, it is highly critical to develop effective approaches and strategies against the side effects of CT and RT [5].
Irinotecan (CPT-11), is a semi-synthetic derivative of the plant alkaloid camptothecin (7-ethyl-10-[4-(piperdino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin) acting as a topoisomerase inhibitor. It is one of the most important anti-tumour drugs developed in recent years. While CPT-11 is used as a chemotherapeutic-cytotoxic agent with EMA (European Medicines Agency, EU)/FDA (Food and Drug Administration, US) approval in patients with colorectal and pancreatic cancer, positive effects have been seen in clinical studies in ovarian, cervical, lung and stomach cancers [6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, as with other chemotherapeutic agents, one of the treatment-limiting factors of CPT-11′s use is the increased chances of hepatorenal, and gastrointestinal damage. These common negative side effects of chemotherapy currently have no known cure or prevention [12]. In liver, kidney, stomach and intestinal tissues, treatment is limited, due to the increased levels of the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde, decreases in the level of antioxidant enzymes, increases in cytokine levels such as TNF-α and IL-1β, and the activation of matrix metalloproteinase enzymes, causing epithelial cell damage and congestion [13,14]. As a result, the emergence of anti-inflammatory drugs with antioxidant properties is helping to ameliorate these negative side effects.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a mucolytic drug, first developed for acetaminophen (paracetamol) overdose, later gaining importance in many studies for its strong antioxidant effect. NAC is a small molecule with antioxidant capabilities that contains a thiol group [15]. NAC has been a widely used tool for investigating the redox sensitivity of biological or pathological processes [16]. It is known to increase the capacity to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In previous studies, NAC’s antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects have been shown to prevent tissue damage in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [17], chronic kidney failure [18], and mobile phone radiation-induced oxidative stress [19].
Irinotecan is a widely used anti-chemotherapeutic agent and has many known side effects [20]. Various agents against irinotecan toxicity have been established in previous studies [21]. However, the need to test different agents in various study models, especially animal models, remains current. In the light of all these observations, it was aimed to examine the protective effects of NAC, which is a strong antioxidant, by measuring the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokine expressions, proteolytic enzymes, and antioxidant enzymes on the toxicity of irinotecan on liver, kidney, stomach, and small intestine toxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The experimental protocol of this study was approved by the Local Animal Ethics Committee of Near East University (Protocol no. 127-2021/127). Thirty-two Wistar albino rats (250–300 g, male) were housed in a constant-temperature room (22 ± 1 °C) with a 12 h/12 h dark/light cycle. The rats had ad libitum access to food and drinking water.
The study animals were divided into four groups, with eight rats in each group (n = 8). Control group: the animals in this group were administered physiological saline solution (PSS) intraperitoneally (i.p.) on the first day and 0.01 mg/kg atropine subcutaneously (s.c.) (to prevent a possible cholinergic reaction to irinotecan) on the second day. CPT-11 group: PSS (i.p.) administered on day one to the animals in this group. On day two, atropine (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.) (to prevent a possible cholinergic reaction to irinotecan), followed by CPT-11 (125 mg/kg, i.p.) [22] administration. In the NAC group, animals were administered PSS (i.p.) on day one and atropine (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.) and a single dose of NAC (150 mg/kg, i.p.) [15]. CPT-11+NAC group: PSS (i.p.) administered on day one to the animals. On day two, atropine (0.01 mg/kg, s.c.) (to prevent a possible cholinergic reaction to irinotecan) followed by CPT-11 (125 mg/kg, i.p.) once [22], and a single dose of NAC (150 mg/kg, i.p.) [15], were administered.

2.2. Collection of Blood and Tissue Samples

Following the experimental period (48th hour after CPT-11 application), and following the loss of sensation after anaesthesia, the animals in all groups were euthanized by administering high-dose ketamine and xylazine (100 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively) [23]. Blood and tissue samples (liver, kidney, stomach, and intestine) were collected within 2–3 min for laboratory analysis. Blood samples were collected by cardiac vein puncture into vacuum tubes containing clot activators. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation (K241, BRK5324, Centurion Scientific, Chichester, West Sussex, UK), at 1500× g for 10 min, after coagulation. Serum samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Tissue samples (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) were collected for both biochemical and histopathological laboratory assays. After taking samples for biochemical analysis, erythrocytes were removed by perfusing with cold PSS. Then, the tissues were dried with filter paper and divided into two separate pieces for biochemical and histopathological analysis. Samples to be used for biochemical analysis were transferred to tissue sample cups with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and transferred to the laboratory.
Tissue samples were transferred to the laboratory for further processes. Tissues were homogenized, following the manufacturer’s protocol using RIPA lysis buffer (item no. 10010263, batch no. 0490889-1, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, US) and Dounce tissue grinder set (D8938, Lot. 3110, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) on ice. Then the homogenates were subjected to centrifugation at +4 °C at 10,000× g for 10 min (MIKRO 200R, Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany), and the supernatants were portioned and stored at −80 °C, prior to analysis. Tissue sections to be used for histopathological examination were placed in containers containing 10% formaldehyde and kept at −80 °C until analysed [24,25,26]. The Bradford method was performed to quantify protein concentrations in tissue homogenates [27].

2.3. Measurements of Serum Enzyme Activities and Metabolites

Alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), lipase and amylase enzyme activities and total protein (TP), albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine tests were determined in blood samples, according to The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry IFCC protocols. Test parameters were measured using an automated chemistry analyser (BS-240 Vet, Mindray, Shenzhen, China).

2.4. Measurements of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines

The concentrations of IL-1β and TNF-α in serum and tissue homogenates were determined by commercially available rat-specific ELISA assay kits (ELR-IL1β and ELR-TNF-α RayBiotech Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Measurements of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and TIMP-1

MMPs and TIMP-1, which play a role in many biological processes such as cancer and inflammation, were quantified in both tissue homogenates and serum, following the manufacturer’s instructions and the guidelines of the commercially available rat-specific ELISA assays (MMP-1 E-EL-R0617, Elabscience, Houston, TX, USA; MMP-2 ELR-MMP2; MMP-8 ELR-MMP8; TIMP-1 ELR-TIMP-1, RayBiotech Inc., Norcross, GA, USA).

2.6. Measurements of Antioxidant Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation

GPx and SOD activities were measured using ready-to-use assay kits in tissue homogenates (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) (RANSEL RS505, RANSOD SD125, Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, County Antrim, UK) by using an automated BS-240 VET Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, China).
MDA concentrations were measured in tissue homogenates (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) to assess lipid peroxidation status, using commercially available assay kits (TBARS Assay Kit, item no. 10009055, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The principal measurement was based on the reaction with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in boiling water for 60 min in an acidic medium, and measurement of the absorbance of the reaction mixture at 532 nm [28]. Absorbance was measured with VersaMax Tunable Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.7. Histopathological Evaluation

Tissues (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) obtained immediately after the experimental period were fixed in 10% neutral formalin for 48 h, dehydrated in ascending alcohol series, and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 5 μm thickness were cut from the tissues, and routine hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed. Sections were examined histopathologically, using an Olympus BX50 photomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using the GraphPad Prism software (version 7.04, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare groups of data, and these were subsequently examined using Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. A difference of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Serum Enzyme Activities and Metabolite Concentrations Restored by NAC

Serum enzyme activities (ALT, AST, ALP, LDH, amylase, lipase in U/L) and metabolite concentrations (BUN and creatinine in mg/dL; albumin and TP in g/dL) are shown in Table 1. ALT, AST, ALP and LDH activities, BUN and creatinine levels significantly increased in the CPT-11 group, compared with the control group (p < 0.001–0.0001). ALT, AST, ALP, and LDH activities, BUN and creatinine levels were significantly different between the CPT-11+NAC group and the CPT-11 group (p < 0.05–0.0001).

3.2. Activities of Tissue Antioxidant Enzymes and Concentration of Lipid Peroxidation Were Reduced by NAC

The activities of GPx, SOD, and the concentration of MDA in tissue homogenates (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) are represented as U/mg protein (GPx and SOD) and nmol MDA/mg protein (MDA) in Figure 1. In comparison with both control and NAC groups, administration of CPT-11 significantly reduced GPx and SOD activities in the CPT-11 groups, in all tissue homogenates (p < 0.05–0.001). In addition, the GPx (small intestine, liver, kidney) and SOD (stomach, kidney) activities of the CPT-11+NAC groups were elevated to the levels of the control and NAC groups, and were significantly different from the CPT-11 group (p < 0.05–0.001).
However, the activities of GPx (stomach, kidney) and SOD (small intestine, liver) in the CPT-11+NAC group were increased, compared with the CPT-11 group (p < 0.05–0.01), although there remained a major difference when compared with the control group (p < 0.05–0.01).
In all tissue homogenates, MDA concentrations were remarkably elevated in the CPT-11 groups, compared with the control and NAC groups (p < 0.001–0.0001). Furthermore, there was a noticeable difference when compared with the CPT-11 group, in the MDA concentration of the CPT-11+NAC groups (p < 0.01–0.001) and in the increased concentration levels of the control and NAC groups in all tissues.

3.3. NAC Administration Decreased IL-1β and TNF-α Levels

Serum and tissue-homogenate (stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney) levels of IL-1β and TNF-α are shown as pg/mL in serum and pg/mg Protein in tissue homogenates in Figure 2. In CPT-11 groups, CPT-11 administration significantly increased both serum and all tissue-homogenate levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, compared with both control and NAC (p < 0.05–0.0001) groups. IL-1β and TNF-α levels in the serum and all tissue homogenates reduced significantly in the CPT-11+NAC group, in comparison with the CPT-11 group (p < 0.05–0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the experimental groups of control and NAC in the serum and all tissue homogenates.

3.4. NAC Reverses MMPs Activities and TIMP-1 Levels

The serum and tissue-homogenate activities of MMPs and levels of TIMP-1 are shown as pg/mL and pg/mg protein, respectively, in Table 2. CPT-11 administration significantly increased MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-8 activities, and decreased TIMP-1 levels in the CPT-11 groups in serum and all tissue homogenates, compared with both control and NAC groups (p < 0.05–0.0001). Although there was a considerable difference in comparison with the CPT-11 group, the MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-8 activities of the CPT-11+NAC groups decreased, and the TIMP-1 levels of the CPT-11+NAC groups increased to the level of the control and NAC groups in the serum and all tissue homogenates (p < 0.05–0.0001).

3.5. Histopathological Findings

In the control group of the stomach, gastric tissue observations revealed a regular epithelial layer and gastric glands (Figure 3a). These structures were similar in the NAC group (Figure 3b). In the CPT-11 group, an irregular gastric epithelium and remarkable expansion of the gland structures were observed (Figure 3c). In the CPT11+NAC group, regression of openings of the gastric epithelial columns and improvement in gland structure were found (Figure 3d).
The stomach degeneration of the surface epithelium, disruptions in gland structures, and congestion scores increased considerably in the CPT-11 group when compared with the control and NAC groups (p < 0.01–0.0001). After treatment with NAC, the elevated stomach degeneration of the surface epithelium, disruptions in gland structures, and congestion scores, were significantly depressed (p < 0.05–0.0001) (Table 3).
The control intestinal group (Figure 4a) and NAC group (Figure 4b) exhibited regular epithelial cells with regular villi and intestinal gland structures. In the CPT-11 group, severe shedding of villous epithelial cells, disruptions in the intestinal gland epithelium, and occasional capillary intravascular congestion were observed (Figure 4c). In the CPT11+NAC group, it was observed that the shedding of the villus epithelial cells regressed, and the intestinal gland epithelium healed (Figure 4d).
The small intestine villus degeneration, congestion in the lamina propria, and disruption of the intestinal glands score in the CPT-11 group, were found to be notably higher than the control and NAC groups (p < 0.01–0.0001). When NAC was administered, the elevations in small intestine villus degeneration, congestion in the lamina propria, and disruption of the intestinal glands scores were significantly suppressed (p < 0.05–0.001) (Table 3).
Liver tissue was observed with smooth sinusoids and hepatocytes in the control group (Figure 5a). The NAC group also recorded images that were similar (Figure 5b). Severe enlargement of hepatocytes and loss of cytoplasm were observed in the CPT-11 group (Figure 5c). In the CPT-11+NAC group, it was observed that the loss of hepatocyte cytoplasm decreased, and sinusoids appeared (Figure 5d).
Control kidney tissue had smooth glomerular and tubular structures (Figure 6a) and tissues in the NAC group showed similar images (Figure 6b). In the CPT-11 group, in addition to severe congestion and shedding of tubule cells, caste formations were also observed (Figure 6c). While regeneration of tubular structures was observed in the CPT-11+NAC group, it was observed that intratubular caste formations continued where the congestion regressed (Figure 6d).
In the CPT-11 group, degeneration in hepatocytes, sinusoids, and tubular cells, and kidney congestion scores showed a drastic increase (p < 0.05–0.0001), compared with the control and NAC groups. Conversely, the increase in scores significantly recovered in the CPT-11+NAC groups (p < 0.05–0.001) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Today, despite all kinds of developments in the health sector, cancer cases are increasing, and the mortality rate remains high. Although significant progress has been made in cancer treatment through the application of chemotherapy, which began in the mid 20th century, the side effects of these chemotherapeutic agents are an important limiting factor in their use [29,30,31]. Therefore, both experimental and clinical studies on additional new drugs for the cancer treatment regimen, to reduce the negative effects of chemotherapeutic agents, are increasing. The chemotherapeutic agent CPT-11, a semisynthetic analogue of the natural alkaloid camptothecin, proved to be effective in patients with colorectal and pancreatic cancers, albeit with a high incidence of severe adverse effects. Hence, the purpose of this study was to investigate the possible ameliorating effect of NAC, a well-established antioxidant, on CPT-11-induced systemic toxicity in rats.
CPT-11 is metabolized by carboxylesterases (CESs) to form the pharmacologically active metabolites that bind and stabilize the topoisomerase I–DNA complex [32]. These metabolites are generally understood to be the main factors underlying the unique hepatorenal and GI toxicity of CPT-11 [17]. As is the case with other chemotherapeutic agents, CPT-11 has adverse effects. Hepatorenal and gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common issues caused by its use [33]. Currently, the major problem with CPT-11 use is that it causes hepatorenal injury and GI mucositis in patients; this is the most important factor limiting the dose of medication given to patients [34].
In the present study, it was observed that CPT-11 application changed AST, ALT, ALP and LDH activities, BUN, and creatinine levels in rat sera. It has been reported in the literature that increases in these parameters are evidence of changes at tissue and organ level [35,36]. Increases in AST, ALT, BUN, creatinine, LDH and ALP are markers of cellular damage in systemic tissues. Consistent with hepatorenal and gastrointestinal damage caused by CPT-11 application, a significant increase in serum enzyme activities was observed [36,37]. The serum activities of these markers were found to be significantly raised in the CPT-11 group, and NAC significantly reduced these increases and reversed CPT-11 toxicity. High activities of AST, ALT, LDH and ALP and high levels of BUN and creatinine in the blood may be an indicator of long-term systemic changes. Levels of these markers have been associated with hepatorenal and gastrointestinal tract damage [38]. Indeed, the histopathological findings obtained in this study support this observation. Other studies obtained similar histopathological findings, using different agents against the hepatorenal and gastrointestinal toxic effect of CPT-11 [39]. The CPT-11 application was determined to cause structural damage in stomach, small intestine, liver and kidney tissues, and this damage regressed following NAC treatment.
N-Acetylcysteine is a glutathione inducer and an antioxidant used for mucolytic purposes [18]. In addition to its mucolytic effects, it is used clinically, to scavenge the toxic metabolites that occur with the depletion of glutathione stores during paracetamol poisoning [40]. Many studies have shown NAC to have anti-inflammatory properties along with antioxidant properties, and for this purpose, it has been studied in various toxicity and inflammation models [17,18]. Although NAC reduces the toxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents, there are controversial findings suggesting it can reduce the effect of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients because reactive oxygen species (ROS) are required for the destruction of tumour cells. It is ironic that reactive oxygen species both cause and suppress cancer, as a result of chemotherapy. For example, in breast cancer cases, the survival of tumour cells depends on high ROS levels. Therefore, the reduction of these ROS levels is also important for the destruction of cancer cells. With these effects, NAC can show beneficial effects not only by looking at the negative effects of chemotherapy, but also by reducing the level of ROS needed by the cancer cell [41]. In this study, the main aim was to explore the protective effect of NAC against the toxicity caused by CPT-11, which has been used in cancer treatment in recent years. It was determined that inflammatory, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant and proteolytic enzyme markers examined with CPT-11 application were significantly negatively affected, whereas NAC application had a regenerative effect. In addition, the histopathological examination of stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney tissues found results to be compatible with biochemical results.
TNF-α and IL-1β are cytokines with pleiotropic effects [42]. While they have a protective impact on the body with their effects on pathogens, their excessive secretion causes an inflammatory response and leads to tissue damage [43]. Because of these properties, they are known to be the main regulatory molecules in the physiopathology of inflammation. Additionally, it has been shown that the expression of these cytokines is associated with the disruption of oxidant–antioxidant balance, and increases the activities of proteolytic enzymes such as MMPs [44]. It has been suggested that NAC reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in different experimental models [17,45]. In the current study, consistent with previous studies, it was observed that TNF-α and IL-1β levels increased in serum, liver, kidney, stomach, and intestinal tissues of rats, following CPT-11 treatment. However, NAC administration decreased cytokine expression in these tissues, thus providing supporting evidence for its anti-inflammatory effect.
MMPs are a family of proteolytic enzymes, and essential components of the extracellular matrix, with important roles in many processes, including tissue repair and inflammatory response [46]. Tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) are effective regulators of MMPs’ activities; in other words, they are natural MMP inhibitors [47]. They exert their inhibitory effects by non-specifically binding to MMPs [48]. Therefore, changes in MMP and TIMP levels determine the effectiveness of MMPs in contributing to tissue homeostasis [49]. Significant changes were detected in the levels of MMP-1, -2, -8 and TIMP-1, both in the blood serum as a reflection of the systemic response and in the hepatorenal and gastrointestinal tract tissues of animals treated with CPT-11. The relationship between MMP and TIMP levels in cases of inflammatory and oxidant–antioxidant imbalance has been shown in different study models [50]. On the other hand, it was found that these levels were reversed in the NAC-treated groups. Several models of inflammation have been used to study how NAC affects the activities of MMPs and the levels of TIMP-1 expression [51,52]. This suggests that CPT-11-derived MMPs are up-regulated and contribute to the damage, but NAC triggers down-regulation pathways with its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.
Disruption of the balance between oxidant and antioxidant molecules is defined as oxidative stress. It is known that the oxidant–antioxidant balance may be disrupted by drugs used in cancer treatment, and that organ damage develops as a result of this. Oxidative stress is known to play a major role in pathophysiological processes, and various biomarkers are being evaluated to demonstrate and monitor this [53]. Three of these, and the most studied ones, MDA, GPx and SOD, were measured in this study in order to assess the effects of CPT-11 and NAC. In some studies, the effect of CPT-11 was investigated in various tissues, including intestinal mucosa, and it was observed that levels of MDA increased and that the activities of GPx and SOD decreased, in these tissues [53,54]. In this study, MDA levels increased, with suppression of GPX and SOD activities in rats treated with CPT-11. As a sulfhydryl donor group, it was determined that MDA levels were significantly reduced in animals that received NAC, which revealed its antioxidant property, and were at the same level as the animals in the control group. This suggests that NAC is effective in reducing MDA levels by scavenging lipid peroxyl radicals. Furthermore, we feel that the significant increase in GPx and SOD activities in the CPT-11 and NAC-applied group is also an important finding. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanism of the effect of CPT-11 on these enzyme levels.

5. Conclusions

In line with the findings obtained in this study, the protective effect of NAC can be attributed to the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine expressions caused by CPT-11, proteolytic enzyme activation, and the correction of the deteriorated oxidant–antioxidant balance. These findings were also supported by histopathological examinations. Toxicity in cancer treatment is the most important limiting factor in its treatment. Although many studies have been carried out to date, this problem still remains. Although CPT-11 has been used in many cancer treatments in recent years, its damage to hepatorenal and gastrointestinal tissues is significant. Therefore, we believe that these results encourage the design of further detailed cancer studies using NAC.

Author Contributions

S.G.: Conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, resources, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; D.C.: methodology, resources, writing—review and editing; A.Ö.Ş.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; K.T.: conceptualization, investigation, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing; F.B.: methodology, resources, writing—review and editing; Ş.Ç.: data curation, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing; S.S.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and its later amendments were followed. Near East University Local Animal Experiments Ethics Committee approved the study (Protocol no. 127-2021/127 on 26 February 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chien, C.-R.; Hsia, T.-C.; Chen, C.-Y. Cost-Effectiveness of Chemotherapy Combined with Thoracic Radiotherapy versus Chemotherapy Alone for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Propensity-Score Matched Analysis. Thorac Cancer 2014, 5, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Çakır, T.; Baştürk, A.; Polat, C.; Aslaner, A.; Durgut, H.; Şehirli, A.Ö.; Gül, M.; Öğünç, A.V.; Gül, S.; Sabuncuoglu, M.Z.; et al. Does Alfa Lipoic Acid Prevent Liver from Methotrexate Induced Oxidative Injury in Rats? Acta Cir. Bras. 2015, 30, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bilginaylar, K.; Aykac, A.; Sayiner, S.; Özkayalar, H.; Şehirli, A.Ö. Evaluation of the Antiapoptotic and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Chitosan in Methotrexate-Induced Oral Mucositis in Rats. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 3237–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chukwunyere, U.; Mercan, M.; Sehirli, A.O.; Abacioglu, N. Possible Cytoprotective Mechanisms of Oxytocin against 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Gastrointestinal Mucositis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 4055–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. de Man, F.M.; van Eerden, R.A.G.; van Doorn, G.M.; Oomen-de Hoop, E.; Koolen, S.L.W.; Olieman, J.F.; de Bruijn, P.; Veraart, J.N.; van Halteren, H.K.; Sandberg, Y.; et al. Effects of Protein and Calorie Restriction on the Metabolism and Toxicity Profile of Irinotecan in Cancer Patients. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 109, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Milano, G.; Innocenti, F.; Minami, H. Liposomal Irinotecan (Onivyde): Exemplifying the Benefits of Nanotherapeutic Drugs. Cancer Sci. 2022, 113, 2224–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakamura, A.; Harada, M.; Watanabe, K.; Harada, T.; Inoue, A.; Sugawara, S. Phase II Study of S-1 and Irinotecan Combination Therapy in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0804 (NJLCG0804). Med. Oncol. 2022, 39, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawamoto, Y.; Yuki, S.; Sawada, K.; Nakamura, M.; Muto, O.; Sogabe, S.; Shindo, Y.; Ishiguro, A.; Sato, A.; Tsuji, Y.; et al. Phase II Study of Ramucirumab Plus Irinotecan Combination Therapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: HGCSG1603. Oncologist 2022, 27, e642–e649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mori, T.; Makino, H.; Okubo, T.; Fujiwara, Y.; Sawada, M.; Kuroboshi, H.; Tsubamoto, H.; Murakoshi, H.; Motohashi, T.; Kitawaki, J.; et al. Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Irinotecan and Nedaplatin Followed by Radical Hysterectomy and the Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced, Bulky Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Kansai Clinical Oncology Group Study (KCOG-G1201). J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019, 45, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tate, S.; Nishikimi, K.; Matsuoka, A.; Otsuka, S.; Kato, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Shozu, M. Tailored-Dose Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Irinotecan in Patients with Platinum-Refractory/Resistant Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: A Phase II Trial. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 32, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kciuk, M.; Marciniak, B.; Kontek, R. Irinotecan-Still an Important Player in Cancer Chemotherapy: A Comprehensive Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Q.Y.; Wang, F.X.; Jia, K.K.; Kong, L.D. Natural Product Interventions for Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy-Induced Side Effects. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pingili, R.B.; Pawar, A.K.; Challa, S.R.; Kodali, T.; Koppula, S.; Toleti, V. A Comprehensive Review on Hepatoprotective and Nephroprotective Activities of Chrysin against Various Drugs and Toxic Agents. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 308, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zeynali-Moghaddam, S.; Mohammadian, M.; Kheradmand, F.; Fathi-Azarbayjani, A.; Rasmi, Y.; Esna-Ashari, O.; Malekinejad, H. A Molecular Basis for the Synergy between 17-allylamino-17-demethoxy Geldanamycin with Capecitabine and Irinotecan in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells through VEFG and MMP-9 Gene Expression. Gene 2019, 684, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sener, G.; Tosun, O.; Sehirli, A.O.; Kacmaz, A.; Arbak, S.; Ersoy, Y.; Ayanoglu-Dulger, G. Melatonin and N-Acetylcysteine Have Beneficial Effects during Hepatic Ischemia and Reperfusion. Life Sci. 2003, 72, 2707–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhitkovich, A. N-Acetylcysteine: Antioxidant, Aldehyde Scavenger, and More. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 1318–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Uzun, M.A.; Koksal, N.; Kadioglu, H.; Gunerhan, Y.; Aktas, S.; Dursun, N.; Sehirli, A.O. Effects of N-Acetylcysteine on Regeneration Following Partial Hepatectomy in Rats with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Surg. Today 2009, 39, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sehirli, A.O.; Sayiner, S.; Velioğlu-Oğünç, A.; Serakinci, N.; Eksioglu-Demiralp, E.; Yegen, B.; Ercan, F.; Sener, G. The Influence of N-Acetylcysteine Alone and in Combination with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist on Systemic and Tissue Levels in Rats with Experimentally-Induced Chronic Renal Failure. Pak. J. Zool 2020, 52, 1263–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ozgur, E.; Güler, G.; Seyhan, N. Mobile Phone Radiation-Induced Free Radical Damage in the Liver Is Inhibited by the Antioxidants n-Acetyl Cysteine and Epigallocatechin-Gallate. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010, 86, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, Y.; Song, B.; Chen, Z. Efficacy and Side Effects of Irinotecan Combined with Nedaplatin versus Paclitaxel Combined with Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and Tumor Marker Analysis: Based on a Retrospective Analysis. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 2022, 5936773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, H.; Lu, C.; Gao, F.; Qian, Z.; Yin, Y.; Kan, S.; Chen, D. Selenium-Enriched Bifidobacterium Longum DD98 Attenuates Irinotecan-Induced Intestinal and Hepatic Toxicity in Vitro and in Vivo. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 143, 112192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fakiha, K.; Coller, J.K.; Logan, R.M.; Gibson, R.J.; Bowen, J.M. Amitriptyline Prevents CPT-11-Induced Early-Onset Diarrhea and Colonic Apoptosis without Reducing Overall Gastrointestinal Damage in a Rat Model of Mucositis. Support. Care Cancer 2019, 27, 2313–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stringer, A.M.; Gibson, R.J.; Bowen, J.M.; Logan, R.M.; Yeoh, A.S.-J.; Keefe, D.M.K. Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis: The Role of Gastrointestinal Microflora and Mucins in the Luminal Environment. J. Support. Oncol. 2007, 5, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, J.-Q.; Ding, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.-M. Protective Effects of Ursolic Acid in an Experimental Model of Liver Fibrosis through Nrf2/ARE Pathway. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2015, 39, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Doguc, D.K.; Gurbuz, N.; Aylak, F.; Savik, E.; Gultekin, F. Farklı Dozlarda Ardıç Yağının Sıçan Karaciğerinde Antioksidan Enzimler Üzerine Etkisi The Effect of Different Doses of Juniper Oil on the Antioxidant Enzymes in Rat Liver. SDU J. Health Sci. Inst. 2012, 3, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zahr, N.M.; Luong, R.; Sullivan, E.V.; Pfefferbaum, A. Measurement of Serum, Liver, and Brain Cytokine Induction, Thiamine Levels, and Hepatopathology in Rats Exposed to a 4-Day Alcohol Binge Protocol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2010, 34, 1858–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yagi, K. Assay for Lipid Peroxides in Animal Tissues by Thiobarbituric Acid Reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 95, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nurgali, K.; Jagoe, R.T.; Abalo, R. Editorial: Adverse Effects of Cancer Chemotherapy: Anything New to Improve Tolerance and Reduce Sequelae? Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arruebo, M.; Vilaboa, N.; Sáez-Gutierrez, B.; Lambea, J.; Tres, A.; Valladares, M.; González-Fernández, Á. Assessment of the Evolution of Cancer Treatment Therapies. Cancers 2011, 3, 3279–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Falzone, L.; Salomone, S.; Libra, M. Evolution of Cancer Pharmacological Treatments at the Turn of the Third Millennium. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Man, F.M.; Goey, A.K.L.; van Schaik, R.H.N.; Mathijssen, R.H.J.; Bins, S. Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2018, 57, 1229–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Ren, Y.; Lan, T.; Li, D.; Tian, J.; Jiang, W. Darunavir Alleviates Irinotecan-Induced Intestinal Toxicity in Vivo. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 834, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Riera, P.; Artigas-Baleri, A.; Salazar, J.; Sebio, A.; Virgili, A.C.; Arranz, M.J.; Páez, D. ABCB1 Genetic Variants as Predictors of Irinotecan-Induced Severe Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yokooji, T.; Kawabe, Y.; Mori, N.; Murakami, T. Effect of Genistein, a Natural Soy Isoflavone, on the Pharmacokinetics and Intestinal Toxicity of Irinotecan Hydrochloride in Rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 65, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vincenzi, B.; Imperatori, M.; Picardi, A.; Vespasiani Gentilucci, U.; Gallo, P.; Fausti, V.; Spalato Ceruso, M.; Santini, D.; Tonini, G. Liver Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line FOLFIRI-Containing Regimen: A Single Institution Experience. Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2015, 15, 971–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Mao, Y.; Huang, M.; Yuan, B.; Chu, Z.; Lu, G. Synergetic Toxicity of DATR, a Recombinant Soluble Human TRAIL Mutant, in Combination with Traditional Chemotherapeutics in Rats. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 64, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oršolić, N.; Benković, V.; Lisičić, D.; Đikić, D.; Erhardt, J.; Horvat Knežević, A. Protective Effects of Propolis and Related Polyphenolic/Flavonoid Compounds against Toxicity Induced by Irinotecan. Med. Oncol. 2010, 27, 1346–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boeing, T.; Gois, M.B.; de Souza, P.; Somensi, L.B.; Sant’Ana, D.M.G.; da Silva, L.M. Irinotecan-Induced Intestinal Mucositis in Mice: A Histopathological Study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fersahoğlu, M.M.; Özkan, E.; Velioğlu-Öğünç, A.; Sayıner, S.; Ercan, F.; Çilingir Kaya, Ö.T.; Şehirli, A.Ö. Impact of Pycnogenol on Acetaminophen-Induced Hepatorenal Damage. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 12, 8070–8080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kwon, Y. Possible Beneficial Effects of N-Acetylcysteine for Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Markov, A.V.; Sen’kova, A.V.; Babich, V.O.; Odarenko, K.V.; Talyshev, V.A.; Salomatina, O.V.; Salakhutdinov, N.F.; Zenkova, M.A.; Logashenko, E.B. Dual Effect of Soloxolone Methyl on LPS-Induced Inflammation In Vitro and In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Luthra, S.; Maroo, S.; Maroo, N.; Grover, H. The Pleotropic Role of Statins: Could It Be the Imminent Host Modulation Agent in Periodontics? Dent. Res. J. 2013, 10, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Aksoy, U.; Savtekin, G.; Şehirli, A.Ö.; Kermeoğlu, F.; Kalender, A.; Özkayalar, H.; Sayıner, S.; Orhan, K. Effects of Alpha-Lipoic Acid Therapy on Experimentally Induced Apical Periodontitis: A Biochemical, Histopathological and Micro-CT Analysis. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zmora, O.; Gutzeit, O.; Segal, L.; Boulos, S.; Millo, Z.; Ginsberg, Y.; Khatib, N.; Fainaru, O.; Ross, M.G.; Weiner, Z.; et al. Maternal N-acetyl-cysteine Prevents Neonatal Brain Injury Associated with Necrotizing Enterocolitis in a Rat Model. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2021, 100, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kermeoğlu, F.; Sayıner, S.; Şehirli, A.Ö.; Savtekin, G.; Aksoy, U. Does α-Lipoic Acid Therapeutically Effective against Experimentally Induced-Acute Pulpitis in Rats? Aust. Endod. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wen, W.; Zhu, S.; Ma, R.; Wang, L.; Shen, X.; Li, Y.; Feng, N.; Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Xie, L.; et al. Correlation Analysis of TGF-Β1, MMP-9, TIMP-1, IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Retrospective Study. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2022, 50, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ries, C. Cytokine Functions of TIMP-1. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Charzewski, Ł.; Krzyśko, K.A.; Lesyng, B. Structural Characterisation of Inhibitory and Non-Inhibitory MMP-9–TIMP-1 Complexes and Implications for Regulatory Mechanisms of MMP-9. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, B.; Abdel-Rahman, M.H.; Wang, T.; Pouly, S.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Cebulla, C.M. Retinal MMP-12, MMP-13, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 Expression in Murine Experimental Retinal Detachment. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sampilvanjil, A.; Karasawa, T.; Yamada, N.; Komada, T.; Higashi, T.; Baatarjav, C.; Watanabe, S.; Kamata, R.; Ohno, N.; Takahashi, M. Cigarette Smoke Extract Induces Ferroptosis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020, 318, H508–H518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kulshrestha, R.; Pandey, A.; Jaggi, A.; Bansal, S. Beneficial Effects of N-Acetylcysteine on Protease-Antiprotease Balance in Attenuating Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Rats. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020, 23, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Uyanık, Ö.; Gürbüz, Ş.; Çiftci, O.; Oğuztürk, H.; Aydın, M.; Çetin, A.; Başak, N.; Gökhan Turtay, M.; Yücel, N. Curcumin Protects against Testis-Specific Side Effects of Irinotecan. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 7440–7448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rtibi, K.; Selmi, S.; Grami, D.; Sebai, H.; Amri, M.; Marzouki, L. Irinotecan Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress: Underlying Causes of Disturbed Mucosal Water and Electrolyte Transport. Pathophysiology 2017, 24, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antioxidants 11 02219 g001 550
Figure 1. GPx, SOD activities and MDA concentration of stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney tissue in experimental groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001, ns: non-significant.
Figure 1. GPx, SOD activities and MDA concentration of stomach, small intestine, liver, and kidney tissue in experimental groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001, ns: non-significant.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g001
Antioxidants 11 02219 g002 550
Figure 2. Serum, stomach, small intestine, liver and kidney levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in experimental groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001, ns: non-significant.
Figure 2. Serum, stomach, small intestine, liver and kidney levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in experimental groups. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001, ns: non-significant.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g002
Antioxidants 11 02219 g003 550
Figure 3. Histological view of stomach: (a) Control group of *: regular gastric glands and ‣: regular gastric epithelium, (b) NAC group of *: regular gastric glands and ‣: regular gastric epithelium, (c) CPT-11 group of *: irregular and enlarged gastric glands and ‣: gastric epithelium and →: openings between gastric epithelial columns, (d) CPT-11+NAC group of ‣: regression of openings between gastric epithelial columns and →: gastric epithelium. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Figure 3. Histological view of stomach: (a) Control group of *: regular gastric glands and ‣: regular gastric epithelium, (b) NAC group of *: regular gastric glands and ‣: regular gastric epithelium, (c) CPT-11 group of *: irregular and enlarged gastric glands and ‣: gastric epithelium and →: openings between gastric epithelial columns, (d) CPT-11+NAC group of ‣: regression of openings between gastric epithelial columns and →: gastric epithelium. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g003
Antioxidants 11 02219 g004 550
Figure 4. Histological view of small intestine: (a) Control group of →: villi structures observed with smooth intestinal epithelial cells; (b) NAC group of →: villi with smooth epithelial cells similar to the control group; (c) CPT-11 group of *: disruptions in the intestinal glands, and ‣: capillary congestion, and →: severe shedding of epithelial cells in villus structures; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of *: regression of disorders in the intestinal glands, and →: healings in villus epithelial cells. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Figure 4. Histological view of small intestine: (a) Control group of →: villi structures observed with smooth intestinal epithelial cells; (b) NAC group of →: villi with smooth epithelial cells similar to the control group; (c) CPT-11 group of *: disruptions in the intestinal glands, and ‣: capillary congestion, and →: severe shedding of epithelial cells in villus structures; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of *: regression of disorders in the intestinal glands, and →: healings in villus epithelial cells. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g004
Antioxidants 11 02219 g005 550
Figure 5. Histological view of liver: (a) Control group of →: regular hepatocytes and central vein in the middle; (b) NAC group of →: central vein and sinusoids; (c) CPT-11 group of →: hepatocytes that are severely enlarged and have lost their cytoplasm; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of ‣: hepatocytes were observed to regenerate, and →: the sinusoids returned to their former structures. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Figure 5. Histological view of liver: (a) Control group of →: regular hepatocytes and central vein in the middle; (b) NAC group of →: central vein and sinusoids; (c) CPT-11 group of →: hepatocytes that are severely enlarged and have lost their cytoplasm; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of ‣: hepatocytes were observed to regenerate, and →: the sinusoids returned to their former structures. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g005
Antioxidants 11 02219 g006 550
Figure 6. Histological view of kidney: (a) Control group of →: regular tubular and ‣: glomerular structures; (b) NAC group of →: regular tubular structures; (c) CPT-11 group of *: capillary congestion and →: severe shedding and caste formations in tubular cells; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of *: regression in congestion, and →: decreased shedding of tubule cells. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Figure 6. Histological view of kidney: (a) Control group of →: regular tubular and ‣: glomerular structures; (b) NAC group of →: regular tubular structures; (c) CPT-11 group of *: capillary congestion and →: severe shedding and caste formations in tubular cells; (d) CPT-11+NAC group of *: regression in congestion, and →: decreased shedding of tubule cells. Hematoxylin & Eosin staining, 50 µm scale bar.
Antioxidants 11 02219 g006
Table
Table 1. Changes in serum enzymes and metabolites in the sera of rats (mean ± SD).
Table 1. Changes in serum enzymes and metabolites in the sera of rats (mean ± SD).
ControlNACCPT-11CPT-11+NAC
Albumin (g/dL)3.25 ± 0.253.27 ± 0.233.17 ± 0.252.91 ± 0.34
TP (g/dL)6.10 ± 0.636.15 ± 1.825.78 ± 1.604.76 ± 0.40
ALP (U/L)124.20 ± 54.96137.2 ± 45.55266.20 ± 57.47 ***,††153.00 ± 43.78 §§
ALT (U/L)47.36 ± 11.2774.58 ± 13.51157.80 ± 29.16 ****,††††85.91 ± 20.13 *,§§§§
AST (U/L)60.69 ± 23.3063.82 ± 20.94140.80 ± 23.23 ****,††††84.40 ± 19.59 §§
LDH (U/L)398 ± 140727 ± 1612392 ± 817 ****,††††901 ± 236 §§§§
BUN (mg/dL)12.97 ± 2.3214.87 ± 3.0223.49 ± 3.68 ****,†††17.86 ± 2.60 *,†
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.47 ± 0.130.51 ± 0.151.06 ± 0.19 ****, ††††0.56 ± 0.10 §§§§
Amylase (U/L)2096 ± 1281990 ± 1711910 ± 2521909 ± 270
Lipase (U/L)30.33 ± 2.2527.33 ± 1.6326.67 ± 1.8627.33 ± 5.28
* p < 0.05 *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001 compared with control; † p < 0.05 †† p < 0.01 ††† p < 0.001 †††† p < 0.0001 compared with NAC; §§ p < 0.01 §§§§ p < 0.0001 compared with CPT-11.
Table
Table 2. Changes in MMPs activities and TIMP-1 levels in the sera and tissues of rats (mean ± SD).
Table 2. Changes in MMPs activities and TIMP-1 levels in the sera and tissues of rats (mean ± SD).
ControlNACCPT-11CPT-11+NAC
MMP-1 (Serum pg/mL; Tissues pg/mg Protein)
Serum2.31 ± 0.44751.895 ± 0.48427.053 ± 1.871 ****,††††2.943 ± 1.06 §§§§
Stomach1.175 ± 0.52531.41 ± 0.48782.842 ± 0.975 ***,††1.81 ± 0.3281 §
Small Intestine0.5817 ± 0.2150.5533 ± 0.2431.165 ± 0.2037 ***,†††0.8033 ± 0.1646 §
Liver0.91 ± 0.38761.368 ± 0.28832.463 ± 0.5477 ****,†††1.687 ± 0.3654 *,§
Kidney1.572 ± 0.47821.551 ± 0.85033.873 ± 1.047 ***,†††2.247 ± 0.5629 §§
MMP-2 (Serum pg/mL; Tissues pg/mg Protein)
Serum21.51 ± 6.65820.00 ± 4.48453.63 ± 19.79 ***,†††32.67 ± 4.73§
Stomach1.393 ± 0.31011.645 ± 0.40542.552 ± 0.5098 ***,††1.685 ± 0.4281 §§
Small Intestine1.06 ± 0.28660.945 ± 0.35262.423 ± 0.4816 ****,††††1.615 ± 0.3868 †,§§
Liver0.905 ± 0.28180.9117 ± 0.35971.837 ± 0.3499 **,†1.188 ± 0.4857 §
Kidney0.8333 ± 0.5281.103 ± 0.41062.265 ± 0.3682 ***,††1.428 ± 0.4825 §
MMP-8 (Serum pg/mL; Tissues pg/mg Protein)
Serum80.67 ± 12.9084.75 ± 13.42222.60 ± 68.85 ****,††††114.00 ± 32.13 §§§
Stomach2.553 ± 1.5573.007 ± 1.6267.078 ± 2.104 ***,††4.195 ± 0.9386 §
Small Intestine1.407 ± 0.56061.307 ± 0.37083.44 ± 0.7098 ****,††††2.313 ± 0.4913 *,†,§§
Liver3.542 ± 0.74314.722 ± 0.7989.173 ± 1.768 ****,†††6.305 ± 2.086 *,§
Kidney4.475 ± 1.3035.152 ± 0.869511.08 ± 1.861 ****,††††6.343 ± 1.629 §§§§
TIMP-1 (Serum pg/mL; Tissues pg/mg Protein)
Serum1210 ± 368.2851.5 ± 221.8322.3 ± 87.42 ****,††742.7 ± 152.7 *,§
Stomach1261.0 ± 320.81143 ± 241.1685.9 ± 178.8 **,†1088 ± 182.7 §
Small Intestine518.40 ±49.80447.90 ± 73.52109.70 ± 39.56 ****,††††261.70 ± 73.67 ****,†††,§§
Liver276.10 ± 80.72274.90 ± 56.13101.60 ± 24.29 ***,†††190.20 ± 41.62 §
Kidney353.20 ± 81.03307.40 ± 63.7297.83 ± 21.72 ****,††††190.10 ± 25.94 ***,††,§
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 **** p < 0.0001 compared with control; † p < 0.05 †† p < 0.01 ††† p < 0.001 †††† p < 0.0001 compared with NAC; § p < 0.05 §§ p < 0.01 §§§ p < 0.001 §§§§ p < 0.0001 compared with CPT-11.
Table
Table 3. Scores of tissue homogenate (stomach, small intestine, liver, kidney) histomorphological measurements (Mean ± SD).
Table 3. Scores of tissue homogenate (stomach, small intestine, liver, kidney) histomorphological measurements (Mean ± SD).
ControlNACCPT-11CPT-11+NAC
Stomach
Degeneration of surface epithelium2.31 ± 0.451.90 ± 0.487.05 ± 1.87 ****,††††2.94 ± 1.06 §§§§
Disruptions in gland structures1.18 ± 0.531.41 ± 0.492.84 ± 0.98 ***,††1.81 ± 0.33 §
Congestion0.58 ± 0.220.55 ± 0.241.17 ± 0.20 ***,†††0.80 ± 0.16 §
Small Intestine
Villus degeneration21.51 ± 6.6620.00 ± 4.4853.63 ± 19.79 ***,†††32.67 ± 4.73 §
Congestion in lamina propria1.39 ± 0.311.65 ± 0.402.55 ± 0.51 ***,††1.68 ± 0.42 §§
Disruption of intestinal glands1.06 ± 0.290.95 ± 0.352.42 ± 0.48 ****,††††1.61 ± 0.39 †,§§
Liver
Degeneration in hepatocytes80.67 ± 12.9084.75 ± 13.42222.60 ± 68.85 ****,††††114.00 ± 32.13 §§§
Degeneration in sinusoids2.55 ± 1.563.01 ± 1.627.09 ± 2.10 ***,††4.20 ± 0.94 §
Kidney
Degeneration in tubular cells1210.0 ± 368.2851.5 ± 221.8322.3 ± 87.4 ****,††742.7 ± 152.7 *,§
Congestion1261.0 ± 320.81143.0 ± 241.0685.9 ± 178.8 **,†1088.0 ± 182.7 §
Caste formation in tubules518.4 ± 49.8447.9 ± 73.5109.7 ± 39.7 ****,††††261.7 ± 73.7 ****,†††,§§
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001 **** p < 0.001 compared with CTRL; † p < 0.05 †† p < 0.01 ††† p < 0.001 †††† p < 0.0001 compared with NAC; § p < 0.05 §§ p < 0.01 §§§ p < 0.001 §§§§ p < 0.0001 compared with CPT-11.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gençosman, S.; Ceylanlı, D.; Şehirli, A.Ö.; Teralı, K.; Bölükbaşı, F.; Çetinel, Ş.; Sayıner, S. Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Induced Toxicity in Rats. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112219

AMA Style

Gençosman S, Ceylanlı D, Şehirli AÖ, Teralı K, Bölükbaşı F, Çetinel Ş, Sayıner S. Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Induced Toxicity in Rats. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(11):2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gençosman, Sevgi, Deniz Ceylanlı, Ahmet Özer Şehirli, Kerem Teralı, Furkan Bölükbaşı, Şule Çetinel, and Serkan Sayıner. 2022. "Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Induced Toxicity in Rats" Antioxidants 11, no. 11: 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112219

APA Style

Gençosman, S., Ceylanlı, D., Şehirli, A. Ö., Teralı, K., Bölükbaşı, F., Çetinel, Ş., & Sayıner, S. (2022). Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against Irinotecan (CPT-11)-Induced Toxicity in Rats. Antioxidants, 11(11), 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11112219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop