Next Article in Journal
Pricing American Options with a Non-Constant Penalty Parameter
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulatory Restrictions on US Bank Funding Sources: A Review of the Treatment of Brokered Deposits
Previous Article in Journal
GARCH Generated Volatility Indices of Bitcoin and CRIX
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relative Efficiency of Canadian Banks: A Three-Stage Network Bootstrap DEA
Open AccessArticle

Microfinance Participation in Thailand

Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
Faculty of Economics, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(6), 122;
Received: 19 May 2020 / Revised: 7 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2020 / Published: 11 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Banking and the Economy)
Income inequality is a major problem in Thailand. A key determinant of income inequality in Thailand is the lack of financial access to financial institutions for low-income families. Microfinance institutions (MFIs) play an important role in enabling poor households to access financial resources at a reasonable cost. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors that affect Thai households participating in microfinance programs in Thailand. A multinomial logit model is used to investigate the factors that impact the Thai households’ access to microfinance. The study employs secondary data from the Thai Socioeconomic Survey (cross-sectional data in 2017) to identify factors affecting Thai household participation in microfinance programs. The results show that the Village Fund (VF) targets low-income rural households and encourages those with older household heads who have lower levels of education, and female household heads, to participate in their program. Larger households are more likely to access the VF. Households with higher dependency ratios are less likely to borrow from the VF. Households with well-educated, young household heads in regional areas are more likely to borrow money from Saving Groups for Production (SGPs). SGP borrower households have higher household incomes than VF borrower households. Our findings indicate that VFs and SGPs are credit sources in the rural credit market; these sources enable rural households to access credit to meet their needs. In addition, rural Thai households borrow from many sources so that they can rotate their loan repayments. Low-income households refinance their loans by borrowing from different sources. View Full-Text
Keywords: microfinance participation; Village Funds; Saving Groups for Production; Thailand; income inequality microfinance participation; Village Funds; Saving Groups for Production; Thailand; income inequality
MDPI and ACS Style

Hemtanon, W.; Gan, C. Microfinance Participation in Thailand. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 122.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop