Next Article in Journal
The Distribution of Cross Sectional Momentum Returns When Underlying Asset Returns Are Student’s t Distributed
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Economic Freedom on Economic Growth? New European Dynamic Panel Evidence
Open AccessArticle

Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study

1
College of Management and Technology, School of Management, Walden University, 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA
2
School of Management, International School of Management Paris, 17 Boulevard Raspail, 75007 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sophia Velez has worked over 16 years as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with large banks providing consulting services. As a CPA, she worked for firms such as PriceWaterhoCoopers LLP (PwC) where she performed financial audits and attestation services for large banks.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13020028
Received: 30 December 2019 / Revised: 28 January 2020 / Accepted: 29 January 2020 / Published: 5 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Banking and Finance)
Compliance measures emphasized in the Dodd-Frank Bill 2010, Section 165 is a response to the 2008 financial crisis, that requires large banks to maintain a minimum capital ratio. The Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) regulates capital of Bank Holding Companies (BHC) through compliance Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP) 2009 and Comprehensive Capital Adequacy Review (CCAR) 2011 annual stress test of capital. The Fed imposed a minimum capital ratio of 8% that has derailed the risk management objective of capital adequacy, as bank managers are forced to take on more risk to meet the capital ratio. This study concerns senior manager practices that can be effective in meeting compliance requirements posed by the Fed for BHCs. Through a qualitative e-Delphi study, 10 banking finance experts were convened to build consensus on senior manager’s practices that can be effective in meeting compliance requirements. Data were collected from three electronic questionnaires submitted through Qualtrics. Data were analyzed using theoretical triangulation, coding, and thematic analysis. Four important considerations were identified that could bolster compliance measures effectiveness: (a) emphasis placed on understanding regulatory consultant compliance, (b) maintenance of effective and independent compliance align to organizational objectives, (c) clear definition of data source for compliance analytics. These considerations of compliance practices may help senior bank managers reduce risky behaviors and investments that cause significant bank losses. View Full-Text
Keywords: BHC; compliance; capital regulation; risk management; compliance analytics BHC; compliance; capital regulation; risk management; compliance analytics
MDPI and ACS Style

Velez, S.; Neubert, M.; Halkias, D. Banking Finance Experts Consensus on Compliance in US Bank Holding Companies: An e-Delphi Study. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop