Next Article in Journal
The Aumann–Serrano Performance Index for Multi-Period Gambles in Stock Data
Previous Article in Journal
A Hausman Test for Partially Linear Models with an Application to Implied Volatility Surface
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Advancements in Section “Economics and Finance”

Department of Economics and Finance, Gordon S. Lang School of Business and Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(11), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110289
Submission received: 13 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 20 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Economics and Finance)
The section “Economics and Finance” brings together a collection of papers that cover a variety of topics both in the areas of economics and finance. In particular we will showcase some of the published papers in this section that best capture the quality and the importance of these contributions as they cover many research areas of interest such as cryptocurrencies, primary and secondary corporate bond markets, new methods for modeling financial transactions, emerging markets, the link between real estate and stock markets, hedging and realized volatility to name a few. Below we present the main findings of these papers as they seem to span a wide area of applications in financial economics.
More specifically, Kyriazis (2019) provides a systematic survey on return and volatility spillovers of cryptocurrencies based on the empirical results of relevant academic literature and finds that that Bitcoin is the most influential among digital coins, mainly as a transmitter towards digital currencies, but also as a receiver of spillovers from virtual currencies and alternative assets. Goldstein et al. (2019) look at the herding of investors as one major risk factor that is typically ignored in statistical approaches to portfolio modelling and risk management and they stress promising and novel approaches of modelling herding risk which merit empirical analysis. Men et al. (2019) propose a variant of a threshold stochastic conditional duration (TSCD) model for financial data at the transaction level. They develop a novel Markov chain Monte Carlo method (MCMC) for parameter estimation of the model and simulations demonstrate that the proposed TSCD model and MCMC method work well in terms of parameter estimation and duration forecasting. The proposed model and method are applied to two classic data sets that have been studied in the literature, namely IBM and Boeing transaction data. Pinto and Rastogi (2019) examine whether a firm’s dividends are influenced by the sector to which it belongs. They find that size, profitability, and interest coverage ratios have a significant positive relationship to dividend policy, while business risk and debt reveal a significant negative relationship with dividends. The results of this study can be used by financial managers and policymakers in order to make appropriate dividend decisions and they can also help investors make portfolio selection decisions based on sectoral dividend paying behavior. Liow et al. (2019) revisit the relationship between securitized real estate and local stock markets by focusing on their time-scale co-movement and contagion dynamics across five developed countries, using a wavelet-based method allowing for the relationship between the two asset markets to be time–frequency varying. Leistikow and Chen (2019) investigate whether the traditional futures hedge ratio (hT) and the carry cost rate futures hedge ratio (hc) vary in accordance with the Sercu and Wu (2000) and Leistikow et al. (2019) “hc” theory and they find their results to be consistent with the theory. Finally, Eriksson et al. (2019) introduce a parsimonious and yet flexible semiparametric model to forecast financial volatility. The new model is semiparametric in the sense that the distributional and functional forms of its error component are partially unspecified and the statistical properties of the model are discussed. Extensive simulation studies were undertaken to validate the new method, the results of which suggest that it works reasonably well in finite samples. The out-of-sample forecasting performance of the proposed model was evaluated against a number of standard models, using data on S&P 500 monthly realized volatilities, concluding that the new model generally generates highly competitive forecasts relative to other methods.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eriksson, Anders, Daniel P. A. Preve, and Jun Yu. 2019. Forecasting Realized Volatility Using a Nonnegative Semiparametric Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Goldstein, Michael A., Edith S. Hotchkiss, and David J. Pedersen. 2019. Secondary Market Liquidity and Primary Market Pricing of Corporate Bonds. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2019. A Survey on Empirical Findings about Spillovers in Cryptocurrency Markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Leistikow, Dean, and Ren-Raw Chen. 2019. Carry Cost Rate Regimes and Futures Hedge Ratio Variation. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Leistikow, D., R. Chen, and Y. Xu. 2019. Spot Asset Carry Cost Rates and Futures Minimum Risk Hedge Ratios, SSRN Working Paper 3373739. In process. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liow, Kim Hiang, Xiaoxia Zhou, Qiang Li, and Yuting Huang. 2019. Time-Scale Relationship between Securitized Real Estate and Local Stock Markets: Some Wavelet Evidence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Men, Zhongxian, Adam W. Kolkiewicz, and Tony S. Wirjanto. 2019. Threshold Stochastic Conditional Duration Model for Financial Transaction Data. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pinto, Geetanjali, and Shailesh Rastogi. 2019. Sectoral Analysis of Factors Influencing Dividend Policy: Case of an Emerging Financial Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12: 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sercu, Piet, and Xueping Wu. 2000. Cross and Delta Hedges: Regression versus Price-Based Hedge Ratios. Journal of Banking and Finance 24: 737–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stengos, T. Recent Advancements in Section “Economics and Finance”. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110289

AMA Style

Stengos T. Recent Advancements in Section “Economics and Finance”. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2020; 13(11):289. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stengos, Thanasis. 2020. "Recent Advancements in Section “Economics and Finance”" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13, no. 11: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110289

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop