Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Mixed Methods and Innovation Management Research
2.1. Definition of Mixed Methods Approach
2.2. The Application of Mixed Methods Research
2.3. The Advantages and Limitations of Mixed Methods
2.4. Innovation Management Research
3. Research Methodology
4. Characteristics of the Included Studies
5. Discussion of the Results of Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Source Title | Authors | Year | Cited by |
International Journal of Business Innovation and Research | Ahmadi M., Osman M.H.M. | 2020 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION SCIENCE | Almeida, Fernando; Kennedy, Andrew John; Lin, Brook; Nowak, Irina V. | 2019 | 0 |
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION | Barak, Miri; Usher, Maya | 2019 | 3 |
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE | Burleson, Grace; Tilt, Bryan; Sharp, Kendra; MacCarty, Nordica | 2019 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH | Duarte, Paulo; Pinho, Jose Carlos | 2019 | 3 |
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | Ghezzi, Antonio | 2019 | 3 |
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | Grimsby, Sveinung; Kure, Cathrine Finne | 2019 | 0 |
Journal of Cleaner Production | Hankammer S., Brenk S., Fabry H., Nordemann A., Piller F.T. | 2019 | 3 |
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE | Imran, Ahmed; Gregor, Shirley | 2019 | 0 |
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | Korneta, Piotr | 2019 | 0 |
INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION | Larsson, Zeynep Yetis; Di Gangi, Paul M.; Teigland, Robin | 2019 | 1 |
International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics | Lecossier A., Pallot M., Crubleau P., Richir S. | 2019 | 2 |
AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING | Lecossier, Adrien; Pallot, Marc; Crubleau, Pascal; Richir, Simon | 2019 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH | Luetjen, Heiner; Schultz, Carsten; Tietze, Frank; Urmetzer, Florian | 2019 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RETAIL DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER RESEARCH | Olsson, Annika; Paredes, Karla Marie B.; Johansson, Ulf; Roese, Malin Olander; Ritzen, Sofia | 2019 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | Shen, Yi | 2019 | 0 |
Management Research Review | Teixeira E.K., Oliveira M., Curado C. | 2019 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | van de Burgwal, Linda H. M.; Dias, Ana; Claassen, Eric | 2019 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | Vlok, Awie; Ungerer, Marius; Malan, Johan | 2019 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | Walwyn, David; Bertoldi, Andreas; Gable, Christian | 2019 | 1 |
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT | Al-edenat, Malek | 2018 | 3 |
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL | Al-Husseini, Sawasn; Elbeltagi, Ibrahim | 2018 | 0 |
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | Chasanidou, Dimitra; Sivertstol, Njal; Hildrum, Jarle | 2018 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURING | Corsi, Christian; Prencipe, Antonio | 2018 | 0 |
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISING COMMUNITIES-PEOPLE AND PLACES IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY | Cowell, Margaret; Lyon-Hill, Sarah; Tate, Scott | 2018 | 3 |
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT | Crammond, Robert; Omeihe, Kingsley Obi; Murray, Alan; Ledger, Kirstin | 2018 | 1 |
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE | Edling, Laura; Danks, Cecilia | 2018 | 1 |
LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL | Fu, Lihua; Liu, Zhiying; Liao, Suqin | 2018 | 1 |
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT | Harrison, Richard; Scheela, William; Lai, P. C.; Vivekarajah, Sivapalan | 2018 | 3 |
1ST ITB CENTENNIAL AND 4TH PLANOCOSMO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE | Holis, Y. M.; Syabri, I.; Prabatmojo, H. | 2018 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOUR & RESEARCH | Ilonen, Sanna; Heinonen, Jarna; Stenholm, Pekka | 2018 | 5 |
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL | Ituarte, Inigo Flores; Chekurov, Sergei; Tuomi, Jukka; Mascolo, Julien Etienne; Zanella, Alessandro; Springer, Patrick; Partanen, Jouni | 2018 | 3 |
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | JosephNg, P. S. | 2018 | 1 |
EDUCATION AND TRAINING | Kapasi, Isla; Grekova, Galina | 2018 | 3 |
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH | Kraus, Sascha; Kallmuenzer, Andreas; Stieger, Daniel; Peters, Mike; Calabro, Andrea | 2018 | 5 |
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION | Kruger, Claudia; Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes; Braga Franca, Sergio Luiz; Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo Luiz | 2018 | 6 |
R & D MANAGEMENT | McAdam, Maura; Debackere, Koenraad | 2018 | 10 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOUR & RESEARCH | Perenyi, Aron; Zolin, Roxanne; Maritz, Alex | 2018 | 8 |
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | Reinhardt, Ronny; Gurtner, Sebastian | 2018 | 3 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT | Tu, Mengru | 2018 | 10 |
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | Bala, Hillol; Venkatesh, Viswanath | 2017 | 2 |
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING | Berker, Thomas; Throndsen, William | 2017 | 1 |
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT | Bican, Peter M.; Guderian, Carsten C.; Ringbeck, Anne | 2017 | 12 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED DEVELOPMENT | Fellnhofer, Katharina | 2017 | 2 |
JOURNAL FOR INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT | Fellnhofer, Katharina | 2017 | 0 |
International Journal of Project Organisation and Management | Ghaben R.K., Jaaron A.A.M. | 2017 | 2 |
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | Grimpe, Christoph; Sofka, Wolfgang; Bhargava, Mukesh; Chatterjee, Rabikar | 2017 | 9 |
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | Kilkis, Siir | 2017 | 0 |
Journal of technology management & innovation | O’Dwyer, Clare; Cormican, Kathryn | 2017 | 1 |
ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW | Radovanovic, Nikola; Dmitrovic, Veljko; Joksimovic, Nevenka Zarkic | 2017 | 1 |
MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE | Saunila, Minna | 2017 | 6 |
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | Thomas, Ashish | 2017 | 0 |
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS | Ai, Chi-Han; Wu, Hung-Che | 2016 | 2 |
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT | Ai, Chi-Han; Wu, Hung-Che | 2016 | 5 |
EDUCATION AND TRAINING | Birdthistle, Naomi; Costin, Yvonne; Hynes, Briga | 2016 | 3 |
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | Boerchers, Morrissa; Fitzpatrick, Patricia; Storie, Christopher; Hostetler, Glen | 2016 | 3 |
R & D MANAGEMENT | Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira; Ghezzi, Antonio; Frank, Alejandro German | 2016 | 35 |
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH | Guidice, Rebecca M.; Mero, Neal P.; Matthews, Lucy M.; Greene, Juanne V. | 2016 | 6 |
RESEARCH POLICY | Hayter, Christopher S. | 2016 | 43 |
TECHNOVATION | Ho, Yuen-Ping; Ruan, Yi; Hang, Chang-Chieh; Wong, Poh-Kam | 2016 | 8 |
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | Klingebiel, Ronald; Joseph, John | 2016 | 14 |
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY | Kopcha, Theodore J.; Rieber, Lloyd P.; Walker, Brandy B. | 2016 | 5 |
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION | Lucas, Kristen; Kerrick, Sharon A.; Haugen, Jenna; Crider, Cole J. | 2016 | 3 |
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | McCarthy, Breda; Liu, Hong-Bo; Chen, Tingzhen | 2016 | 17 |
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT | Monsson, Christian Kjaer; Jorgensen, Soren Berg | 2016 | 8 |
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT | Purchase, Sharon; Kum, Christina; Olaru, Doina | 2016 | 4 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP | Swartz, Ethne; Amatucci, Frances M.; Coleman, Susan | 2016 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | Vicente-Oliva, Silvia; Martinez-Sanchez, Angel; Berges-Muro, Luis | 2016 | 0 |
WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | Abubakar, Habib Auwal | 2015 | 3 |
RESEARCH POLICY | Bakhshi, Hasan; Edwards, John S.; Roper, Stephen; Scully, Judy; Shaw, Duncan; Morley, Lorraine; Rathbone, Nicola | 2015 | 7 |
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT | Bouette, Martin; Magee, Florence | 2015 | 6 |
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | Hofmann, Rupert | 2015 | 7 |
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISING COMMUNITIES-PEOPLE AND PLACES IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY | Khosa, Risimati Maurice; Kalitanyi, Vivence | 2015 | 10 |
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY | Owusu-Manu, D.; Quaigrain, R.; Edwards, D. J. | 2015 | 1 |
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT | Singh, Vishal; Holmstrom, Jan | 2015 | 14 |
Research Journal of Business Management | Siripongdee S., Fongsuwan W. | 2015 | 2 |
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURING | Spiegel, Markus; Marxt, Christian | 2015 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2014 | Timma, Lelde; Blumberga, Andra; Blumberga, Dagnija | 2015 | 2 |
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING | Udawatta, Nilupa; Zuo, Jian; Chiveralls, Keri; Zillante, George | 2015 | 41 |
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS | Walravens, Nils | 2015 | 32 |
European Journal of Innovation Management | Yström A., Aspenberg H., Kumlin A. | 2015 | 5 |
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology | Jafarnejad A., Mohaghar A., Manteghi M., Yasaei M. | 2014 | 0 |
PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PT 1 | Titarenko, B.; Titov, S.; Titarenko, R. | 2014 | 5 |
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE | Dadfar, Hossein; Dahlgaard, Jens J.; Brege, Staffan; Alamirhoor, Amir | 2013 | 23 |
R & D MANAGEMENT | Teirlinck, Peter; Spithoven, Andre | 2013 | 19 |
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING | Hoffmann, Stefan | 2011 | 18 |
TECHNOLOGY PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION | Hu, Zhiwen; McGrath, Ian | 2011 | 18 |
International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management | Jensen K.R. | 2011 | 2 |
European Research Studies Journal | Lagos D., Kutsikos K. | 2011 | 1 |
Journal of Product Innovation Management | Blindenbach-Driessen F., Van Dalen J., Van Den Ende J. | 2010 | 52 |
International Journal of Production Research | Hwang R., Katayama H. | 2009 | 57 |
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY | Islam, Nazrul; Miyazaki, Kumiko | 2009 | 2 |
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | Santo, Marcio de Miranda; Coelho, Gilda Massari; dos Santos, Dalci Maria; Filho, Lelio Fellows | 2006 | 43 |
References
- Abubakar, Habib Auwal. 2015. Entrepreneurship development and financial literacy in Africa. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 11: 281–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, Meghdad, and Mohd Hassan Mohd Osman. 2020. Exploitative dominant balanced ambidexterity solving the paradox of innovation strategies in SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 21: 79–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AI, Chi Han, and Hung Che Wu. 2016a. Benefiting from external knowledge? A study of telecommunications industry cluster in Shenzhen, China. Industrial Management and Data Systems 116: 622–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AI, Chi Han, and Hung Che Wu. 2016b. Where does the source of external knowledge come from? A case of the Shanghai ICT chip industrial cluster in China. Journal of Organizational Change Management 29: 150–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-edenat, Malek. 2018. Reinforcing innovation through transformational leadership: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Change Management 31: 810–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Husseini, Sawasn, and Ibrahim Elbeltagi. 2018. The role of knowledge sharing in enhancing innovation: A comparative study of public and private higher education institutions in Iraq. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55: 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliaga-Isla, Rocío, and Alex Rialp. 2013. Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: Previous findings and ways forward. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 25: 819–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, Fernando, Andrew John Kennedy, Brook Lin, and Irina V. Nowak. 2019. Measuring innovation through a crowd source initiative. International Journal of Innovation Science 11: 471–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, Usama. 2019. Effects of buyer-supplier relationship on social performance improvement and innovation performance improvement. International Journal of Applied Management Science 11: 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, Usama. 2020. Industrial Ecology in Support of Sustainable Development Goals. In Responsible Consumption and Production, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Edited by W. Leal Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, P. Özuyar and T. Wall. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awan, Usama, Andrzej Kraslawski, and Janne Huiskonen. 2018. Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: The relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability 10: 4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Awan, Usama, Robert Sroufe, and Andrzej Kraslawski. 2019. Creativity enables sustainable development: Supplier engagement as a boundary condition for the positive effect on green innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 226: 172–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhshi, Hasan, John S. Edwards, Stephen Roper, Judy Scully, Duncan Shaw, Lorraine Morley, and Nicola Rathbone. 2015. Assessing an experimental approach to industrial policy evaluation: Applying RCT+ to the case of Creative Credits. Research Policy 44: 1462–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bala, Hillol, and Viswanath Venkatesh. 2017. Employees’ reactions to IT-enabled process innovations in the age of data analytics in healthcare. Business Process Management Journal 23: 671–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barak, Miri, and Maya Usher. 2019. The innovation profile of nanotechnology team projects of face-to-face and online learners. Computers and Education 137: 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazeley, Pat. 2015. Mixed methods in management research: Implications for the field. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 13: 27–35. [Google Scholar]
- Berker, Thomas, and William Throndsen.Throndsen. 2017. Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): Three types of maps for coordinated time travel. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19: 214–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, Michael, and Jacob Kogan. 2010. Text Mining: Applications and Theory, Text. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bican, Peter M., Carsten C. Guderian, and Anne Ringbeck. 2017. Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: An intellectual property perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management 21: 1384–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birdthistle, Naomi, Yvonne Costin, and Briga Hynes. 2016. Engendering entrepreneurial competencies in the youth of today: A teacher’s perspective. Education and Training 58: 766–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje, Jan Van Dalen, and Jan Van Den Ende. 2010. Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27: 572–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloch, Carter, Mads P. Sørensen, Ebbe K. Graversen, Jesper W. Schneider, Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt, Kaare Aagaard, and Niels Mejlgaard. 2014. Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach. Evaluation and Program Planning 43: 105–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blumberg, Boris, Donald Cooper, and Pamela Schindler. 2011. Business Research Methods. The International Journal of Accounting 42: 330–33. [Google Scholar]
- Boerchers, Morrissa, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Christopher Storie, and Glen Hostetler. 2016. Reinvention through regreening: Examining environmental change in Sudbury, Ontario. Extractive Industries and Society 3: 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouette, Martin, and Florence Magee. 2015. Hobbyists, artisans and entrepreneurs: Investigating business support and identifying entrepreneurial profiles in the Irish craft sector. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 22: 337–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryman, Alan. 2007. Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burleson, Grace, Bryan Tilt, Kendra Sharp, and Nordica MacCarty. 2019. Reinventing boiling: A rapid ethnographic and engineering evaluation of a high-efficiency thermal water treatment technology in Uganda. Energy Research and Social Science 52: 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, Roslyn. 2011. Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the ‘first generation’. Journal of Management and Organization 17: 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, Roslyn, and Jose F. Molina-Azorin. 2011. The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 19: 256–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camisón, César, and Ana Villar-López. 2014. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research 67: 2891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavanagh, Stephen. 1997. Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher 4: 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chasanidou, Dimitra, Njål Sivertstøl, and Jarle Hildrum. 2018. Exploring employee interactions and quality of contributions in intra-organisational innovation platforms. Creativity and Innovation Management 27: 458–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Hsiang. 2006. Flow on the Net-Detecting Web Users’ Positive Affects and Their Flow States. Computers in Human Behavior 22: 221–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, Henry William, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West. 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, Vicki Plano. 2005. Cross -Disciplinary Analysis of the Use of Mixed Methods in Physics Education Research, Counseling Psychology, and Primary Care. Lincoln: ETD Collection for University of Nebraska. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, R. Robert. 1990. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsi, Christian, and Antonio Prencipe. 2018. Internal funding, debt and external equity: Which of these effectively improve the growth of university spin-offs? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 10: 638–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira, Antonio Ghezzi, and Alejandro Germán Frank. 2016. Business model innovation and strategy making nexus: Evidence from a cross-industry mixed-methods study. R and D Management 46: 414–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowell, Margaret, Sarah Lyon-Hill, and Scott Tate. 2018. It takes all kinds: Understanding diverse entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Enterprising Communities 12: 178–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crammond, Robert, Kingsley Obi Omeihe, Alan Murray, and Kirstin Ledger. 2018. Managing knowledge through social media: Modelling an entrepreneurial approach for Scottish SMEs and beyond. Baltic Journal of Management 13: 303–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Creswell, John, and David Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. New York: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, John, and Vicki Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. New York: SAGE Publications, lnc. [Google Scholar]
- Currall, Steven C., and Annette J. Towler. 2003. Research methods in management and organizational research: Toward integration of qualitative & quantitative techniques. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 513–26. [Google Scholar]
- Dadfar, Hossein, Jens J. Dahlgaard, Staffan Brege, and Amir Alamirhoor. 2013. Linkage between organisational innovation capability, product platform development and performance: The case of pharmaceutical small and medium enterprises in Iran. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 24: 819–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Miranda Santo, Marcio, Gilda Massari Coelho, Dalci Maria dos Santos, and Lélio Fellows Filho. 2006. Text mining as a valuable tool in foresight exercises: A study on nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 1013–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denscombe, Martyn. 2008. Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2: 270–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dosi, Giovanni. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11: 147–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, Paulo, and José Carlos Pinho. 2019. A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption. Journal of Business Research 102: 140–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edling, Laura, and Cecilia Danks. 2018. To adopt or not to adopt? Insights on energy transitions from a study of advanced wood heating. Energy Research and Social Science 45: 331–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faems, Dries. 2020. Moving forward quantitative research on innovation management: A call for an inductive turn on using and presenting quantitative research. R&D Management 50: 352–63. [Google Scholar]
- Fellnhofer, Katharina. 2017a. Financing entrepreneurship by risk capital—Evidence revisited. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development 10: 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fellnhofer, Katharina. 2017b. Evidence revisited: Literature on smart specialisation calls for more mixed research designs. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 8: 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores Ituarte, Iñigo, Sergei Chekurov, Jukka Tuomi, Julien Etienne Mascolo, Alessandro Zanella, Patrick Springer, and Jouni Partanen. 2018. Digital manufacturing applicability of a laser sintered component for automotive industry: A case study. Rapid Prototyping Journal 24: 1203–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frias, Kellilynn M., and Deidre Popovich. 2020. An experiential approach to teaching mixed methods research. Journal of Education for Business 95: 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Lihua, Zhiying Liu, and Suqin Liao. 2018. Is distributed leadership a driving factor of innovation ambidexterity? An empirical study with mediating and moderating effects. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 39: 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geyskens, Inge, Rekha Krishnan, Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp, and Paulo V. Cunha. 2009. A Review and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis Practices in Management Research. Journal of Management 35: 393–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghaben, Rawan K., and Ayham A. M. Jaaron. 2017. Identifying and assessing innovation factors in construction projects in Palestine: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management 9: 350–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghezzi, Antonio. 2019. Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146: 945–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goffin, Keith, Pär Åhlström, Mattia Bianchi, and Anders Richtnér. 2019. Perspective: State-of-the-art: The quality of case study research in innovation management. Journal of Product Innovation Management 36: 586–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Greene, Jennifer C., Valerie J. Caracelli, and Wendy F. Graham. 1989. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11: 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimpe, Christoph, Wolfgang Sofka, Mukesh Bhargava, and Rabikar Chatterjee. 2017. R&D, Marketing Innovation, and New Product Performance: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34: 360–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grimsby, Sveinung, and Cathrine Finne Kure. 2019. How open is food innovation? The crispbread case. British Food Journal 121: 950–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guidice, Rebecca M., Neal P. Mero, Lucy M. Matthews, and Juanne V. Greene. 2016. The influence of individual regulatory focus and accountability form in a high-performance work system. Journal of Business Research 69: 3332–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, Praveen, and Brett E. Trusko. 2014. Global Innovation Science Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
- Hankammer, Stephan, Sebastian Brenk, Hannah Fabry, Anne Nordemann, and Frank T. Piller. 2019. Towards circular business models: Identifying consumer needs based on the jobs-to-be-done theory. Journal of Cleaner Production 231: 341–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, Richard, William Scheela, P. C. Lai, and Sivapalan Vivekarajah. 2018. Beyond institutional voids and the middle-income trap: The emerging business angel market in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 35: 965–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hayter, Christopher S. 2016. Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy 45: 475–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hearst, Marti A., and Daniela Rosner. 2008. Tag clouds: Data analysis tool or social signaller? Paper presented at Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, January 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, Yuen Ping, Yi Ruan, Chang Chieh Hang, and Poh Kam Wong. 2016. Technology upgrading of Small-and-Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) through a manpower secondment strategy—A mixed-methods study of Singapore’s T-Up program. Technovation 57–58: 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffmann, Stefan. 2011. Anti-consumption as a means to save jobs. European Journal of Marketing 45: 1702–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hofmann, Rupert. 2015. Visionary competence for long-term development of brands, products, and services: The trend receiver concept and its first applications at Audi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101: 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holis, Ym, Ibnu Syabri, and Hastu Prabatmojo. 2018. An Examination of Regional Competitiveness: Early Findings from Banten, Indonesia. Paper presented at 1st Itb Centennial and 4th Planocosmo Internationa l Conference, Bandung, Indonesia, April 3–5; vol. 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Zhiwen, and Ian McGrath. 2011. Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education 20: 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Reakook, and Hiroshi Katayama. 2009. A multi-decision genetic approach for workload balancing of mixed-model U-shaped assembly line systems. International Journal of Production Research 47: 3797–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilonen, Sanna, Jarna Heinonen, and Pekka Stenholm. 2018. Identifying and understanding entrepreneurial decision-making logics in entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 24: 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imran, Ahmed, and Shirley Gregor. 2019. Conceptualising an IT mindset and its relationship to IT knowledge and intention to explore IT in the workplace. Information Technology and People 32: 1536–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, Nazrul, and Kumiko Miyazaki. 2009. NanoSI: Exploring nanotechnology research conflation and nano-innovation dynamism in the case of Japan. Science and Public Policy 36: 170–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iturrioz, Cristina, Cristina Aragón, and Lorea Narvaiza. 2015. How to foster shared innovation within SMEs’ networks: Social capital and the role of intermediaries. European Management Journal 33: 104–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafarnejad, Ahmad, Ali Mohaghar, Manochehre Manteghi, and Mehrdad Yasaei. 2014. Explore critical success factors of new product development in Iranian’s food industry. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 8: 1052–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, Karina R. 2011. Creating Global Innovation Opportunities through Cross-cultural Collaboration. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management: Annual Review 10: 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jick, Todd D. 1979. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johnson, R. Burke, and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33: 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- JosephNg, Poh Soon. 2018. EaaS Optimization: Available yet hidden information technology infrastructure inside medium size enterprise. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 132: 165–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapasi, Isla, and Galina Grekova. 2018. What do students think of self-determined learning in entrepreneurship education? Education and Training 60: 841–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kılkış, Şiir. 2017. Sustainable R&D and innovation system comparisons of India, Russia, Mexico and Turkey. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 28: 315–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchenham, Barbara. 2004. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele: Keele University. [Google Scholar]
- Klingebiel, Ronald, and John Joseph. 2016. Entry timing and innovation strategy in feature phones. Strategic Management Journal 37: 1002–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopcha, Theodore J., Lloyd P. Rieber, and Brandy B. Walker. 2016. Understanding university faculty perceptions about innovation in teaching and technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 47: 945–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korneta, Piotr. 2019. Critical success factors for Polish agricultural distributors. British Food Journal 121: 1565–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraus, Sascha, Andreas Kallmuenzer, Daniel Stieger, Mike Peters, and Andrea Calabrò. 2018. Entrepreneurial paths to family firm performance. Journal of Business Research 88: 382–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruger, Claudia, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, Sergio Luiz Braga França, and Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas. 2018. A holistic model integrating value co-creation methodologies towards the sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production 191: 400–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagos, Dimitrios, and Konstadinos Kutsikos. 2011. The role of IT-focused business incubators in managing regional development and innovation. European Research Studies Journal 14: 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lecossier, Adrien, Marc Pallot, Pascal Crubleau, and Simon Richir. 2019a. Towards radical innovations in a mature company: An empirical study on the UX-FFE model. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 33: 172–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lecossier, Adrien, Marc Pallot, Pascal Crubleau, and Simon Richir. 2019b. Construction of an instrument to evaluate the user eXperience of a group of co-creators in the upstream innovation process. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics 10: 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leech, Nancy L., and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2009. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity 43: 265–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, Ana Paula Vilas Boas Viveiros, Kumiko Oshio Kissimoto, Mario Sergio Salerno, Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, and Fernando José Barbin Laurindo. 2016. Innovation management: A systematic literature analysis of the innovation management evolution. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 13: 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lotka, Alfred. 1926. The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity. Washington, DC: Washington Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
- Lucas, Kristen, Sharon A. Kerrick, Jenna Haugen, and Cole J. Crider. 2016. Communicating entrepreneurial passion: Personal Passion vs. Perceived Passion in venture pitches. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 59: 363–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lütjen, Heiner, Carsten Schultz, Frank Tietze, and Florian Urmetzer. 2019. Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research 104: 506–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malan, Leoné, Mark Hamer, Rolandvon Känel, Markus P. Schlaich, Manja Reimann, Nancy Frasure Smith, Gavin W. Lambert, Walthard Vilser, Brian H. Harvey, and Faans Steyn. 2019. Chronic depression symptoms and salivary NOx are associated with retinal vascular dysregulation: The SABPA study. Nitric Oxide 55–56: 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mason, Jennifer. 2006. Mixing Methods in a Qualitatively Driven Way, Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, vol. 6, pp. 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maurice Khosa, Risimati, and Vivence Kalitanyi. 2015. Migration reasons, traits and entrepreneurial motivation of african immigrant entrepreneurs: Towards an entrepreneurial migration progression. Journal of Enterprising Communities 9: 132–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAdam, Maura, and Koenraad Debackere. 2018. Beyond triple helix toward quadruple helix models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice. R&D Management 48: 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- McCarthy, Breda, Hong Bo Liu, and Tingzhen Chen. 2016. Innovations in the agro-food system: Adoption of certified organic food and green food by Chinese consumers. British Food Journal 118: 1334–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-Azorin, José F., Donald D. Bergh, Kevin Corley, and David J. Ketchen Jr. 2017. Mixed methods in the organizational sciences: Taking stock and moving forward. Organizational Research Methods 20: 179–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monsson, Christian Kjær, and Søren Berg Jørgensen. 2016. How do entrepreneurs’ characteristics influence the benefits from the various elements of a business incubator? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 23: 224–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morse, Janice M. 1991. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 40: 120–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nambisan, Satish, and Priya Nambisan. 2008. How to profit from a better Virtual Customer Environment. MIT Sloan Management Review 49: 53–61. [Google Scholar]
- Newbert, Scott L. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 28: 121–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niglas, Katrin. 2004. The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Ph.D. thesis, Tallinn Pedagogical University, Tallinn, Estonia. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242406001_The_Combined_Use_of_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Methods_in_Educational_Research/citations (accessed on 20 October 2020).
- O’Dwyer, Clare, and Kathryn Cormican. 2017. Regulation—Do or die: An analysis of factors critical to new product development in a regulatory context. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 12: 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okoń-Horodyńska, Ewa, Anna Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, Rafal Wisła, and Tomasz Sierotowicz. 2020. New approach to create more effective teams in the innovation process in enterprises. Journal of Business Economics and Management 21: 805–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsson, Annika, Karla Marie Karla, Ulf Johansson, Malin Olander Roese, and Sofia Ritzén. 2019. Organizational climate for innovation and creativity—A study in Swedish retail organizations. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 29: 243–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owusu-Manu, D., R. Quaigrain, and D. J. Edwards. 2015. Barriers constraining management innovation (MI) adoption in the Ghanaian construction consulting sector: A case study. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 13: 612–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, Dina, and João Leitão. 2016. Absorptive capacity, coopetition and generation of product innovation: Contrasting Italian and Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management 71: 10–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perenyi, Aron, Roxanne Zolin, and Alex Maritz. 2018. The perceptions of Australian senior entrepreneurs on the drivers of their entrepreneurial activity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 24: 81–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, Derek John de Solla. 1986. Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
- Radovanović, Nikola, Veljko Dmitrović, and Nevenka Žarkić Joksimović. 2017. From knowledge to innovation and back: Empirical testing of knowledge-intensive industries in Serbia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 5: 119–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reinhardt, Ronny, and Sebastian Gurtner. 2018. The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 132: 268–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritala, Paavo, Sabrina Schneider, and Snejina Michailova. 2020. Innovation management research methods: Embracing rigor and diversity. R&D Management 50: 297–308. [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie, Jane, Jane Lewis, Carol McNaughton Nicholls, and Rachel Ormston, eds. 2013. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Rousseau, Denise M., Joshua Manning, and David Denyer. 2008. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals 2: 475–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandelowski, Margarete, and Julie Barroso. 2003. Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research 52: 226–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunila, Minna. 2017. Understanding innovation performance measurement in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence 21: 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawhney, Mohanbir, and Emanuela Prandelli. 2000. Communities of Creation: Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets. California Management Review 42: 24–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shea, Christine M. 2005. Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management—JET-M 22: 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Yi. 2019. Create synergies and inspire collaborations around the development of intelligent infrastructure for human-centered communities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70: 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, Vishal, and Jan Holmstrom. 2015. Needs and technology adoption: Observation from BIM experience. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 22: 128–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siripongdee, Surapong, and Wanno Fongsuwan. 2015. Thailand’s provincial electricity authority queuing performance management system. Research Journal of Business Management 9: 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spiegel, Markus, and Christian Marxt. 2015. Understanding and breaking innovation lock-in effects. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 7: 266–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Straka, Milan, and Jana Straková. 2017. Tokenizing, POS Tagging, Lemmatizing and Parsing UD 2.0 with UDPipe 88–99. Available online: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/K17-3009.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2020).
- Swartz, Ethné, Frances M. Amatucci, and Susan Coleman. 2016. Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 8: 48–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna. 2020. Management Theory, Innovation, and Organisation. A Model of Managerial Competencies. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna, and Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz. 2014. Managerial Competencies and Innovations in the Company—The Case of Enterprises in Poland. Business, Management and Education 12: 266–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tashakkori, Abbas, and John Creswell. 2007. The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Teirlinck, Peter, and André Spithoven. 2013. Formal R&D management and strategic decision making in small firms in knowledge-intensive business services. R and D Management 43: 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, Eduardo Kunzel, Mirian Oliveira, and Carla Curado. 2019. Linking knowledge management processes to innovation: A mixed-method and cross-national approach. Management Research Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, Ashish. 2017. Multivariate hybrid pathways for creating exceptional customer experiences. Business Process Management Journal 23: 822–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thurston, Wilfreda E., Leslie Cove, and Lynn M. Meadows. 2008. Methodological congruence in complex and collaborative mixed method studies. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 2: 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tidd, Joe, and John Bessant. 2018a. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Tidd, Joe, and John Bessant. 2018b. Innovation management challenges: From fads to fundamentals. International Journal of Innovation Management 22: 1840007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timma, Lelde, Andra Blumberga, and Dagnija Blumberga. 2015. Combined and Mixed Methods Research in Environmental Engineering: When Two is Better Than One. In Energy Procedia. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd., pp. 300–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Titarenko, Boris, Sergey Titov, and Roman Titarenko. 2014. Risk Management in Innovation Projects. Applied Mechanics and Materials 640: 2338–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranfield, David, David Denyer, and Palminder Smart. 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management 14: 207–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Mengru. 2018. An exploratory study of internet of things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management a mixed research approach. In International Journal of Logistics Management. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., pp. 131–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udawatta, Nilupa, Jian Zuo, Keri Chiveralls, and George Zillante. 2015. Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 101: 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van de Burgwal, Linda H. M., Ana Dias, and Eric Claassen. 2019. Incentives for knowledge valorisation: A European benchmark. Journal of Technology Transfer 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman. 2010. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 1635–51. [Google Scholar]
- Vicente-Oliva, Silvia, Ángel Martínez-Sánchez, and Luis Berges-Muro. 2016. Enhancing the outcomes in R&D collaborative projects: An empirical analysis of the middle ebro valley in Spain. International Journal of Innovation Management 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wach, Krzysztof. 2016. Innovative Behaviour of High-Tech Internationalized Firms: Survey Results from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 4: 153–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walravens, Nils. 2015. Mobile city applications for Brussels citizens: Smart City trends, challenges and a reality check. In Telematics and Informatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd., pp. 282–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walwyn, David, Andreas Bertoldi, and Christian Gable. 2019. Building the hydrogen economy through niche experimentation and digitalisation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 30: 1179–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheelwright, Steven C., and Kim B. Clark. 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
- Wipulanusat, Warit, Kriengsak Panuwatwanich, Rodney Anthony Stewart, and Jirapon Sunkpho. 2020. Applying Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Design to Innovation Management. In The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management. Singapore: Springer, pp. 485–95. [Google Scholar]
- Yetis Larsson, Zeynep, Paul M. Di Gangi, and Robin Teigland. 2019. Sharing my way to success: A case study on developing entrepreneurial ventures using social capital in an OSS community. Information and Organization 29: 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yström, Anna, Hedvig Aspenberg, and Annika Kumlin. 2015. Exploring the creative climate in an open innovation arena: Identifying challenges and possibilities. European Journal of Innovation Management 18: 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bracio, K.; Szarucki, M. Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110252
Bracio K, Szarucki M. Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2020; 13(11):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110252
Chicago/Turabian StyleBracio, Klaudia, and Marek Szarucki. 2020. "Mixed Methods Utilisation in Innovation Management Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Summary" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13, no. 11: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110252