Next Article in Journal
Book Review for “Credit Default Swap Markets in the Global Economy” by Go Tamakoshi and Shigeyuki Hamori. Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2018; ISBN: 9781138244726
Previous Article in Journal
Are There Any Volatility Spill-Over Effects among Cryptocurrencies and Widely Traded Asset Classes?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11(4), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm11040067

Between ℙ and ℚ: The ℙ Measure for Pricing in Asset Liability Management

1
Ortec Finance, 3011 XB Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2
DIAM—Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
3
CWI—The Center for Mathematics and Computer Science, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 September 2018 / Revised: 18 October 2018 / Accepted: 21 October 2018 / Published: 24 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Finance)
Full-Text   |   PDF [455 KB, uploaded 24 October 2018]   |  

Abstract

Insurance companies issue guarantees that need to be valued according to the market expectations. By calibrating option pricing models to the available implied volatility surfaces, one deals with the so-called risk-neutral measure Q , which can be used to generate market consistent values for these guarantees. For asset liability management, insurers also need future values of these guarantees. Next to that, new regulations require insurance companies to value their positions on a one-year horizon. As the option prices at t = 1 are unknown, it is common practice to assume that the parameters of these option pricing models are constant, i.e., the calibrated parameters from time t = 0 are also used to value the guarantees at t = 1 . However, it is well-known that the parameters are not constant and may depend on the state of the market which evolves under the real-world measure P . In this paper, we propose improved regression models that, given a set of market variables such as the VIX index and risk-free interest rates, estimate the calibrated parameters. When the market variables are included in a real-world simulation, one is able to assess the calibrated parameters (and consequently the implied volatility surface) in line with the simulated state of the market. By performing a regression, we are able to predict out-of-sample implied volatility surfaces accurately. Moreover, the impact on the Solvency Capital Requirement has been evaluated for different points in time. The impact depends on the initial state of the market and may vary between −46% and +52%. View Full-Text
Keywords: insurance; Solvency II; risk-neutral models insurance; Solvency II; risk-neutral models
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Van Dijk, M.T.P.; De Graaf, C.S.L.; Oosterlee, C.W. Between ℙ and ℚ: The ℙ Measure for Pricing in Asset Liability Management. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11, 67.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Risk Financial Manag. EISSN 1911-8074 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top