Next Article in Journal
Chronic Fatigue Exhibits Heterogeneous Autoimmunity Characteristics Which Reflect Etiology
Previous Article in Journal
Transthoracic Echocardiography-Based Prediction Model of Adverse Event Risk in Patients with COVID-19
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathophysiology
Volume 29
Issue 2
10.3390/pathophysiology29020015
pathophysiology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Expression Level of ABCC6 Transporter in Colon Cancer Cells Correlates with the Activation of Different Intracellular Signaling Pathways

by
Vittorio Abruzzese
1,
Caecilia H. C. Sukowati
2,
Claudio Tiribelli
2,
Ilenia Matera
1,
Angela Ostuni
1,* and
Faustino Bisaccia
1,*
1
Department of Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
2
Fondazione Italiana Fegato ONLUS, AREA Science Park Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathophysiology 2022, 29(2), 173-186; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology29020015
Submission received: 16 February 2022 / Revised: 4 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 12 May 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 6 transporter (ABCC6) is mainly found in the basolateral plasma membrane of hepatic and kidney cells. In hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells, ABCC6 was involved in cell migration. In the present study, we investigated the role of ABCC6 in colon cancer evaluating the effect of Quercetin and Probenecid, inhibitors of the ectonucleotidase NT5E and ABCC6, respectively, on migration rate of Caco2 and HT29 cell lines. Both drugs reduced cell migration analyzed by scratch test. Gene and protein expression were evaluated by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) and Western blot, respectively. In Caco2 cells, in which ABCC6 is significantly expressed, the addition of ATP restored motility, suggesting the involvement of P2 receptors. Contrary to HT29 cells, where the expression of ABCC6 is negligible but remarkable to the level of NT5E, no effect of ATP addition was detected, suggesting a main role on their migration by the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K)/Akt system. Therefore, in some colon cancers in which ABCC6 is overexpressed, it may have a primary role in controlling the extracellular purinergic system by feeding it with ATP, thus representing a potential target for a therapy aimed at mitigating invasiveness of those type of cancers.

1. Introduction

The ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 6 transporter (ABCC6) is an ATP-dependent transporter mainly found in the basolateral plasma membrane of the liver and kidney. Mutations in the ABCC6 gene are associated with pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE), an autosomal recessive disease characterized by a progressive ectopic calcification of elastic fibers in dermal, ocular, and vascular tissues [1,2,3,4]. Although the structural features of the protein have been quite characterized [5,6,7,8,9], a lot of evidence suggests that, apart from directly supplying the extracellular matrix with PPi, ABCC6 may be involved in other specific functions, such as cholesterol homeostasis [10,11].
Control of ABCC6 expression has also been studied and seems to be finely regulated. The promotor region revealed two evolutionary conserved sequence blocks, the first of which is under epigenetic control, since DNA methylation of the CpG islands are inversely correlated with ABCC6 expression in a cell-type-specific manner [12]. The promotor region also contains several transcriptional-factor binding sites such as for agonists of the retinoid X receptor (RXR) [13], for pleomorphic adenoma gene (PLAG) transcription factors [14] and for the zinc finger transcription factor specificity protein 1 (SP1), which may be responsible for TGF-β1-induced expression of ABCC6 and other genes [15]. Finally, a crucial role in regulation of ABCC6 transcription is played by the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4a) [16]. The activity of this transcription factor, which imprints a tissue-specific expression, can also be modulated through the interaction with other proteins or pathways, such as ERK cascade or the CCAAT/Enhancer binding protein ß (C/EBPß), which reduces or increases HNF4α binding to the promotor of ABCC6, thus ultimately regulating its expression [17,18].
Studies have revealed that the overexpression of ABCC6 in HEK293 cells results in the cellular efflux of ATP and other nucleoside triphosphates [19,20]. In the extracellular environment, ATP can be hydrolyzed into AMP by ENPP1 (ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1) and CD39 (ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1, NTPDase-1); in turn, AMP is dephosphorylated into adenosine by CD73 (ecto-5′-nucleotidase, Ecto5′NTase), a key regulator in some tumor processes such as invasion, migration, and metastasis [21,22]. Since PPi is an inhibitor of mineralization, it was proposed that the absence of circulating PPi in PXE patients results in the ectopic mineralization of soft tissues, a typical feature of PXE. In addition to supplying the extracellular environment with PPi, ABCC6 contributes to the extracellular adenosine pool. While ATP and ADP play important roles as extracellular signaling molecules acting on the P2X and P2Y receptors, adenosine activates P1 receptors. Both families of purinergic receptors could have a role in regulation of key basic cellular functions. Several studies have provided interesting evidence about the involvement of purine nucleotides in neoplasia onset and progression [23,24]. Our previous studies showed that ABCC6 knockdown, as well as its pharmacological inhibition by Probenecid, led to a reorganization of the cytoskeleton and downregulated the expression of CD73. The administration of adenosine or ATP restored the normal architecture of filopodia and migration rate, thus indicating that this effect was most likely due to a reduction in the extracellular ATP pool, through a modulation of ABCC6-mediated ATP efflux [25,26]. Quercetin decreased the expression of ABCC6 through the regulation of the AKT signaling pathway, thus also contributing to cytoskeleton rearrangement and reduced cell motility [27].
There is little information on the diagnostic or prognostic role of ABCC6 in some types of cancer [28,29,30,31], as well as, to the best of our knowledge, on the role of ABCC6 in colorectal cancer. According to Global Cancer Statistics 2020 [32], colorectal cancer ranks third in terms of incidence (10%) and second in terms of mortality (9.4%) in both sexes. In order to identify new biomarkers and to suggest new therapeutic approaches, for colorectal cancer, we studied the role of ABCC6 in colon cancer cell lines Caco2 and HT29. It has been reported that the ABCC6 gene was downregulated in colon adenocarcinoma, compared to control tissues [33]. Moreover, ABCC6 expression was found to be higher in human colon cancer-derived cell line Caco2, compared to normal intestine [34]. Involvement of ABCC6 in drug resistance in this type of cancer has been also reported, to some degree [35,36].
Extensive literature has been produced about the extracellular purinergic system in colon cancer. Nylund et al. have provided considerable evidence on the expression of functional ATP receptors in human colon adenocarcinoma-derived HT29 cells [37,38]. They also showed how members of the P2Y subfamily of receptors were significantly overexpressed in histological specimens from colon cancer patients, compared to tumor-free tissues [39]. It has been recently reported that ATP can promote invasion and migration in colon cancer cells and expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) related genes and tumor growth in vivo through the activation of the P2X7 receptor [40]. The effect of ATP seems to be dependent on concentration, since higher levels of ATP may inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis, reflecting the activation of different receptors with lower affinity [41]. This could also explain the contrasting results disclosed by other researchers, who also found an increase in cell death and reduction in proliferation following treatment of high concentrations of ATP [42,43]. Finally, the presence of active nucleotide-metabolizing enzymes has been demonstrated in Caco2 and HT29 cells [44,45].
The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of ABCC6 in the modulation of both the extracellular purinergic system and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway in colon cancer-derived Caco2 and HT29 cells. The main results obtained show that both pathways are involved in cell motility and that ABCC6 substantially contributes to the activation and modulation of the purinergic system by a coordinated expression with the NT5E/CD73 ectonucleotidase.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Treatments

Colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines Caco2 and HT29 were grown in high glucose (4.5 g/L) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L- glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a water-saturated atmosphere with 5% CO2. Cells were treated when they were approximately at 70% confluence. Cells lines were kindly provided by Prof. G. Grassi (University of Trieste). Quercetin and Probenecid were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 20 or 30 mg/mL, respectively, as stock solution. ATP was dissolved in water at a concentration of 100 mg/mL as a stock solution. Final concentration of DMSO did not exceed 0.25% or 0.5%, depending on the experiment. All compounds were purchased from Sigma (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Viability Assay

The effect of test compounds on cell viability was assessed by MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethyl thiazol-2yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. Then, 50,000 cells/cm2 were seeded onto a 96-well plate and were allowed to grow for 24 h. Then, they were treated with progressive dilution of Quercetin or Probenecid for 24 or 48 h, and afterward, they were incubated with fresh medium containing 0.75 mg/mL MTT for 4 h at 37 °C. Once the medium was removed, a stop solution of 1:1 DMSO and isopropanol with 1% of Triton X-100 was added to dissolve the formazan crystals, and absorbance at 570 nm with blank subtraction at 630 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Multiskan TM GO Microplate Spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Viability of treated cells was determined by comparing absorbance values with those of control cells treated with vehicle only.

2.3. Migration Assay

The effect of the test compounds on cell migration was assessed by in vitro wound healing assay, as previous described [27]. Briefly, Caco2 and HT29 were seeded onto a 6-well plate and was allowed to grow until they formed a nearly confluent monolayer. Then, they were treated with Quercetin 165 μM or Probenecid 250 μM in the presence or absence of ATP 500 μM for 12 h, and a linear scratch was performed in the cell monolayer with a sterile 10 μL plastic pipette tip. Cells were treated for further 24 h with the same treatments in the culture medium with a reduced percentage of FBS (1%). Pictures of the scratch were taken at the time of the scratch and at the end of the experiment using a Nikon Eclipse TS 100 inverted microscope equipped with a Nikon Coolpix P6000 digital camera (objective magnification 10x) (Minato, Tokyo, Japan) and were processed with free software Icy image to measure the area of the scratch. Scratch area filled after observation time was calculated as the difference in the area of a representative portion of the scratch at time 0 and after 24 h (AT0-AT24 h).

2.4. Western Blot

Cell pellets were suspended in Laemmli sample buffer (60 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.002% bromophenol blue) supplemented with a cocktail of proteases and phosphatase inhibitors and were sonicated to lyse the cell membranes. Cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE on an 8% gel and protein transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After a 1 h blocking at RT with 5% nonfat dried milk in PBS or TBS with 0.05% Tween 20, membranes were probed overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: 1:1000 anti-β-actin (a2066, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 1:50 anti-ABCC6 (MA1-26542, ThermoFisher 0, Waltham, MA, USA), 1:250 anti-CD73 (1D7, ThermoFisher Scientific), 1:1000 anti-α-tubulin (T9026, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 1:1000 anti-AKT (pan) (C67E7, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), 1:2000 anti-phospho-AKT (Ser 473) (D9E, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). The membranes were washed three times with PBST or TBST and incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h, and the signals were visualized by the ECL™ Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) or the SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), using the Chemidoc TM XRS detection system equipped with Image Lab Software for image acquisition (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Densitometric analysis was performed by using GelAnalyzer 2010 software (Debrecen, Hungary). Protein expression level in treated cells was expressed as a fold change of expression in control cells treated with vehicle only. p-AKT/AKT ratio was obtained by dividing fold change of phosphorylated form per that of total AKT.

2.5. Real-Time PCR

RNA was extracted from cell pellets by using the Quick-RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and was retrotranscripted to cDNA using random primers and the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA) as per producer’s protocol. cDNA was amplified using iTaqTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Waltham, MA, USA) with the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Primers were designed to span exon–exon junctions to prevent unwanted genomic DNA amplification (Table 1).
Quantification of transcripts was obtained with comparative threshold cycle method (2−ΔCt) with β-actin as the endogenous reference control.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All of the assays were performed at least three times independently. The standard error of the mean (sem) or the 95% confidence interval were reported as measures of variability. Statistical analysis was performed by one- or two-way ANOVA, followed by appropriate post hoc analysis, using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). A p value < 0.05 was used as the minimum level of significance.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on Cells Viability

In order to assess the effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on cell viability, an MTT assay was performed on Caco2 and HT29 cells. We treated the cells with various concentrations of test molecules for 24 h, and we obtained the effects on cell viability by comparing MTT reduction in cells treated with drugs or vehicle only (Figure 1).
We did not observe any toxic effects up to a concentration of 165 μM for Quercetin or 250 µM for Probenecid. Therefore, the highest non-toxic concentrations of both Quercetin and Probenecid were chosen for the following experiments.

3.2. Effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on ABCC6 Expression

In this set of experiments, we tested the effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on ABCC6 expression, involved in efflux of ATP from cells. Moreover, as in hepatoma cells, we found a correlation between ABCC6 and NT5E expression, the ectonucleotidase responsible for the production of adenosine, and we assessed basal level of expression of both genes. ABCC6 was about 25 times more expressed than NT5E in Caco2; NT5E expression was about 400 times higher than ABCC6 in HT29 cells (Figure 2a). In Caco2 cells, NT5E protein expression was not detected by primary monoclonal antibody, as no bands appeared in the Western blot (Figure 2b); both mRNA and protein expression of ABCC6 were significantly downregulated by Quercetin in Caco2 cells (Figure 2c,d). In HT29 cells, we found a relevant, yet not statistically significant reduction in both ABCC6 and NT5E transcripts induced by Quercetin (Figure 2e), while NT5E protein was significantly downregulated by Quercetin (Figure 2f).

3.3. Quercetin and Probenecid Affect the Cell Migration Rate: Role of PI3K/Akt and Purinergic Pathways

To study the effects of Quercetin and Probenecid on collective migration in Caco2 and HT29 cell lines, an in vitro scratch test was performed. As shown in Figure 3, both drugs markedly reduced the migration rate in the two cell lines. However, while in Caco2 cells the addition of ATP restored motility, no effect was detected on HT29 cells.
We tested the effects of both Quercetin and Probenecid on the modulation of the AKT pathway, which is among the main regulators of colon cancer cell motility. The results clearly show a significant reduction in the p-AKT/AKT ratio, consistent with a reduced activation of the AKT pathway in Quercetin- and Probenecid-treated HT29 cells; no effect was found in Caco2 cells (Figure 4).
Finally, we assessed the expression level of some relevant purinergic receptors in both cell lines and found the biggest difference in mRNA levels of three ATP receptors, P2RY1, P2RY2 and P2RY14, whose expression was significantly higher in Caco2, compared to HT29 cells (Figure 5).
Compared with HT29, Caco2 cells showed a higher expression level of P2 receptors. No significant differences in the expression level of some P1 receptors were observed.

4. Discussion

Studies performed by ours and other groups pointed out that ABCC6 may have different roles due to its activity of ATP efflux transporter [46]. Besides supplying the extracellular matrix with PPi, a strong inhibitor of mineralization, the transported ATP can contribute to the activation of the extracellular purinergic system, thus affecting cell migration and cytoskeleton rearrangement in cell lines derived from liver cancer, in which ABCC6 is normally expressed. Apart from the liver, it has also been reported that ABCC6 may be overexpressed in some extrahepatic tumors, where it can contribute to drug resistance, even if its role has been debated and is often considered marginal, compared to other ABC transporters.
In this study, we investigated the role of ABCC6 in two colon cancer cell lines, which exhibit different ABCC6 expressions. Migration was investigated, and activation of intracellular pathways have been suggested.
We found that ABCC6 was highly expressed in Caco2 cells and was almost absent in HT29 cells; the opposite was for NT5E, the rate-limiting enzyme in extracellular ATP metabolism. It is known that both cell lines express functional purinergic receptors and ectonucleotidases activity, thus suggesting that purinergic signaling could have a key role in controlling some important cancer aspects, such as proliferation, apoptosis and invasion [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Considered together, the different levels of components of the purinergic system of these two cell types suggest possible different pharmacological responses. We evaluated the effect on Caco2 and HT29 cells of Probenecid and Quercetin, compounds that inhibit the ectonucleotidases NT5E and ABCC6, respectively.
To the best of our knowledge, no effect of Probenecid has been evaluated on colorectal tumor; on the contrary, Quercetin anticancer properties have been investigated in a number of in vivo and in vitro studies that have proposed the involvement of different signaling pathways such as PI3K, MAPK and toll-like receptor 4/NF-κB [47].
Significant reductions in migration rate were observed in both cell types treated with either Probenecid or Quercetin. The restoration of migration rate in Caco2 cells following ATP addition suggests that, in these cells, migration may be dependent on extracellular ATP signaling. At the same time, our hypothesis that the extracellular ATP pool is controlled by ABCC6 is based on the evidence that Probenecid is an inhibitor of ABCC6 transport activity, while Quercetin downregulates its expression. As reported, Quercetin is an inhibitor of both HNF4 [48] and C/EBPβ [49], two key transcriptional regulators of ABCC6 [16,17,18]. As a consequence, both treatments might modulate the purinergic signal through the involvement of P2 receptors for purine nucleotides, which have been found to be significantly expressed in Caco2 compared to that of HT29. It is known that in Caco2 cells, activation of P2Y receptors triggers mitogen-activated protein kinases cascade, leading to the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK) and recruitment of downstream effectors [50,51], which can ultimately affect cell migration by controlling EMT-related gene expression [52] (Figure 6, upper panel).
In HT29 cells, where the expression of ABCC6 is negligible, the activation of the purinergic signal can be controlled by some auxiliary players. The overexpression of NT5E in these cells suggests a role of adenosine P1 receptors, which through the phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase (PI3K)/Akt system, may have a predominant role on their migration [53] (Figure 6, lower panel). The importance of this cell pathway in colon cancer progression has been clearly shown, since its downstream effector, the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin complexes 1 and 2 (mTOR1/2), are often overexpressed in advanced stages of colon cancer [54]. Their inhibition has been proposed as a strategy to mitigate invasion and migration of colon cancer cells, being involved in the regulation of EMT and cytoskeleton rearrangement, via RhoA and Rac1 signaling, which are members of the GTPases family that regulates actin filament assembly [55]. Many authors have reported that downregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway effectively inhibits migration in HT29 cells [56,57]. In HT29 cells, we found that Quercetin and Probenecid significantly reduced phosphorylation of AKT, which can explain an effect on cell motility independently from the involvement of P2 receptors. In both HT29 and HepG2 cells, the addition of ATP to the culture medium, together with Quercetin, did not restore the migration rate [27]. The inhibition of the migration rate induced by Probenecid in HT29 (not restored by ATP) and the decrease in the pAKT/AKT ratio might suggest some effect of Probenecid on this system as reported by different other studies [58,59].
In conclusion, the model we used in this work is particularly emblematic, since in Caco2 cells, in which ABCC6 is highly expressed, it may have a major role in controlling cell migration by feeding the extracellular purine pool with ATP. On the contrary, in HT29 cells, which are lacking ABCC6 expression, but show remarkable levels of NT5E expression, and probably higher ectonucleotidase activity, adenosine could have a predominant role on PI3K/AKT activation accordingly with what has been previously reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.B. and A.O.; formal analysis, V.A. and A.O.; investigation, V.A. and I.M.; methodology, C.H.C.S. and C.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.O. and V.A.; writing—review and editing, F.B. and A.O.; visualization, I.M.; supervision, F.B.; project administration, F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the INBIOMED PROJECT (MIUR, ARS01_01081). C.S. is supported by a grant from Fondazione Umberto Veronesi, Milan, Italy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Terry, S.F. The Human Face of ABCC6. FEBS Lett. 2020, 594, 4151–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Verschuere, S.; Van Gils, M.; Nollet, L.; Vanakker, O.M. From membrane to mineralization: The curious case of the ABCC6 transporter. FEBS Lett. 2020, 594, 4109–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lofaro, F.D.; Mucciolo, D.P.; Murro, V.; Pavese, L.; Quaglino, D.; Boraldi, F. A Case Report of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum with Rare Sequence Variants in Genes Related to Inherited Retinal Diseases. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, J.; Ralph, D.; Boraldi, F.; Quaglino, D.; Uitto, J.; Li, Q. Inhibition of the DNA Damage Response Attenuates Ectopic Calcification in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miglionico, R.; Gerbino, A.; Ostuni, A.; Armentano, M.F.; Monné, M.; Carmosino, M.; Bisaccia, F. New insights into the roles of the N-terminal region of the ABCC6 transporter J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2016, 48, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cuviello, F.; Tellgren-Roth, Å.; Lara, P.; Selin, F.R.; Monné, M.; Bisaccia, F.; Nilsson, I.; Ostuni, A. Membrane insertion and topology of the amino-terminal domain TMD0 of multidrug-resistance associated protein 6 (MRP6). FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 3921–3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostuni, A.; Miglionico, R.; Monné, M.; Castiglione Morelli, M.A.; Bisaccia, F. The nucleotide-binding domain 2 of the human transporter protein MRP6. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2011, 43, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ostuni, A.; Miglionico, R.; Castiglione Morelli, M.A.; Bisaccia, F. Study of the nucleotide-binding domain 1 of the human transporter protein MRP6. Protein Pept. Lett. 2010, 17, 1553–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, H.; Lara, P.; Ostuni, A.; Presto, J.; Johansson, J.; Nilsson, I.; Kim, H. Live-cell topology assessment of URG7, MRP6102 and SP-C using glycosylatable green fluorescent protein in mammalian cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 1587–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brampton, C.; Pomozi, V.; Chen, L.H.; Apana, A.; McCurdy, S.; Zoll, J.; Boisvert, W.A.; Lambert, G.; Henrion, D.; Blanchard, S.; et al. ABCC6 deficiency promotes dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ibold, B.; Tiemann, J.; Faust, I.; Ceglarek, U.; Dittrich, J.; Gorgels, T.G.M.F.; Bergen, A.A.B.; Vanakker, O.; Van Gils, M.; Knabbe, C.; et al. Genetic deletion of Abcc6 disturbs cholesterol homeostasis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arányi, T.; Bacquet, C.; de Boussac, H.; Ratajewski, M.; Pomozi, V.; Fülöp, K.; Brampton, C.N.; Pulaski, L.; Le Saux, O.; Váradi, A. Transcriptional regulation of the ABCC6 gene and the background of impaired function of missense disease-causing mutations. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ratajewski, M.; Bartosz, G.; Pulaski, L. Expression of the human ABCC6 gene is induced by retinoids through the retinoid X receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 350, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ratajewski, M.; de Ven, W.J.; Bartosz, G.; Pulaski, L. The human pseudoxanthoma elasticum gene ABCC6 is transcriptionally regulated by PLAG family transcription factors. Hum. Genet. 2008, 124, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiang, Q.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Li, K.; Uitto, J. Transcriptional regulation and characterization of the promoter region of the human ABCC6 gene. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Vető, B.; Bojcsuk, D.; Bacquet, C.; Kiss, J.; Sipeki, S.; Martin, L. The transcriptional activity of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha is inhibited via phosphorylation by ERK1/2. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. de Boussac, H.; Ratajewski, M.; Sachrajda, I.; Köblös, G.; Tordai, A.; Pulaski, L.; Buday, L.; Váradi, A.; Arányi, T. The ERK1/2-hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha axis regulates human ABCC6 gene expression in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22800–22808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ratajewski, M.; de Boussac, H.; Sachrajda, I.; Bacquet, C.; Kovács, T.; Váradi, A.; Pulaski, L.; Arányi, T. ABCC6 expression is regulated by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein activating a primate-specific sequence located in the first intron of the gene. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 2709–2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jansen, R.S.; Küçükosmanoglu, A.; de Haas, M.; Sapthu, S.; Otero, J.A.; Hegman, I.E.M.; Bergen, A.; Gorgels, T.; Borst, P.; Wetering, K. ABCC6 prevents ectopic mineralization seen in pseudoxanthoma elasticum by inducing cellular nucleotide release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20206–20211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jansen, R.S.; Duijst, S.; Mahakena, S.; Sommer, D.; Szeri, F.; Váradi, A.; Plomp, A.; Bergen, A.A.; Oude Elferink, R.P.; Borst, P.; et al. ABCC6-mediated ATP secretion by the liver is the main source of the mineralization inhibitor inorganic pyrophosphate in the systemic circulation-brief report. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 1985–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yegutkin, G.G. Enzymes involved in metabolism of extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides: Functional implications and measurement of activities. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 49, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Antonioli, L.; Novitskiy, S.V.; Sachsenmeier, K.F.; Fornai, M.; Blandizzi, C.; Haskó, G. Switching off CD73: A way to boost the activity of conventional and targeted antineoplastic therapies. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1686–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Antonioli, L.; Blandizzi, C.; Pacher, P.; Haskó, G. Immunity, inflammation and cancer: A leading role for adenosine. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 842–857. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Antonioli, L.; Blandizzi, C.; Pacher, P.; Haskó, G. The Purinergic System as a Pharmacological Target for the Treatment of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Pharmacol. Rev. 2019, 71, 345–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martinelli, F.; Cuviello, F.; Pace, M.C.; Armentano, M.F.; Miglionico, R.; Ostuni, A.; Bisaccia, F. Extracellular ATP regulates CD73 and ABCC6 expression in HepG2 Cells. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ostuni, A.; Carmosino, M.; Miglionico, R.; Abruzzese, V.; Martinelli, F.; Russo, D.; Laurenzana, I.; Petillo, A.; Bisaccia, F. Inhibition of ABCC6 Transporter Modifies Cytoskeleton and Reduces Motility of HepG2 Cells via Purinergic Pathway. Cells 2020, 9, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abruzzese, V.; Matera, I.; Martinelli, F.; Carmosino, M.; Koshal, P.; Milella, L.; Bisaccia, F.; Ostuni, A. Effect of Quercetin on ABCC6 Transporter: Implication in HepG2 Migration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruiz-Pinto, S.; Pita, G.; Patiño-García, A.; García-Miguel, P.; Alonso, J.; Pérez-Martínez, A.; Sastre, A.; Gómez-Mariano, G.; Lissat, A.; Scotlandi, K.; et al. Identification of genetic variants in pharmacokinetic genes associated with Ewing Sarcoma treatment outcome. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 1788–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salvia, A.M.; Cuviello, F.; Coluzzi, S.; Nuccorini, R.; Attolico, I.; Pascale, S.P.; Bisaccia, F.; Pizzuti, M.; Ostuni, A. Expression of Some ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Hematol. Rep. 2017, 9, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, X.; He, Z.; Zhou, F.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, G. Prognostic significance and molecular mechanisms of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily C members in gastric cancer. Medicine 2019, 98, e18347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, R.Q.; Xiong, G.Y.; Yang, K.W.; Zhang, L.; He, S.M.; Gong, Y.Q.; He, Q.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, Z.C.; Bao, Z.Q.; et al. Detection of urothelial carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma with gross hematuria using selected urine-DNA methylation biomarkers: A prospective, single-center study. Urol. Oncol. 2018, 36, 342.e15–342.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hlavata, I.; Mohelnikova-Duchonova, B.; Vaclavikova, R.; Liška, V.; Pitule, P.; Novák, P.; Bruha, J.; Vyčítal, O.; Holubec, L.; Třeška, V.; et al. The role of ABC transporters in progression and clinical outcome of colorectal cancer. Mutagenesis 2012, 27, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Maubon, N.; Le Vee, M.; Fossati, L.; Audry, M.; Le Ferrec, E.; Bolze, S.; Fardel, O. Analysis of drug transporter expression in human intestinal Caco-2 cells by real-time PCR. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2007, 21, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bu, Y.; Cai, G.; Shen, Y.; Huang, C.; Zeng, X.; Cao, Y.; Cai, C.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.; Liao, D.F.; et al. Targeting NF-κB RelA/p65 phosphorylation overcomes RITA resistance. Cancer Lett. 2016, 383, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, H.; Chi, C.H.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, B.; Jia, R.; Wang, B.J. Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors on ATP-binding cassette transporters in lung cancer A549 and colorectal cancer HCT116 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nylund, G.; Nordgren, S.; Delbro, D.S. Demonstration of functional receptors for noradrenaline and adenosine-5’-triphosphate, but not for prostaglandin E2, in HT-29 human colon cancer cell line. Auton. Autacoid Pharmacol. 2003, 23, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nylund, G.; Nordgren, S.; Delbro, D.S. Expression of P2Y2 purinoceptors in MCG 101 murine sarcoma cells, and HT-29 human colon carcinoma cells. Auton. Neurosci. 2004, 112, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nylund, G.; Hultman, L.; Delbro, D.S. P2Y2- and P2Y4 purinergic receptors are over-expressed in human colon cancer. Auton. Autacoid Pharmacol. 2007, 27, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, W.J.; Hu, C.G.; Luo, H.L.; Zhu, Z.M. Activation of P2×7 Receptor Promotes the Invasion and Migration of Colon Cancer Cells via the STAT3 Signaling. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 586555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Coutinho-Silva, R.; Stahl, L.; Cheung, K.K.; de Campos, N.E.; de Oliveira Souza, C.; Ojcius, D.M.; Burnstock, G. P2X and P2Y purinergic receptors on human intestinal epithelial carcinoma cells: Effects of extracellular nucleotides on apoptosis and cell proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2005, 288, 1024–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Souza, C.O.; Santoro, G.F.; Figliuolo, V.R.; Nanini, H.F.; de Souza, H.S.P.; Castelo-Branco, M.T.L.; Abalo, A.A.; Paiva, M.M.; Coutinho, C.M.L.M.; Coutinho-Silva, R. Extracellular ATP induces cell death in human intestinal epithelial cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yaguchi, T.; Saito, M.; Yasuda, Y.; Kanno, T.; Nakano, T.; Nishizaki, T. Higher concentrations of extracellular ATP suppress proliferation of Caco-2 human colonic cancer cells via an unknown receptor involving PKC inhibition. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 26, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schachter, J.; Alvarez, C.L.; Bazzi, Z.; Faillace, M.P.; Corradi, G.; Hattab, C.; Rinaldi, D.E.; Gonzalez-Lebrero, R.; Pucci Molineris, M.; Sévigny, J.; et al. Extracellular ATP hydrolysis in Caco-2 human intestinal cell line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2021, 1863, 183679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bahrami, F.; Kukulski, F.; Lecka, J.; Tremblay, A.; Pelletier, J.; Rockenbach, L.; Sévigny, J. Purine-metabolizing ectoenzymes control IL-8 production in human colon HT-29 cells. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 879895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bisaccia, F.; Koshal, P.; Abruzzese, V.; Castiglione Morelli, M.A.; Ostuni, A. Structural and Functional Characterization of the ABCC6 Transporter in Hepatic Cells: Role on PXE, Cancer Therapy and Drug Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darband, S.G.; Kaviani, M.; Yousefi, B.; Sadighparvar, S.; Pakdel, F.G.; Attari, J.A.; Mohebbi, I.; Naderi, S.; Majidinia, M. Quercetin: A functional dietary flavonoid with potential chemo-preventive properties in colorectal cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 6544–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Waizenegger, J.; Lenze, D.; Luckert, C.; Seidel, A.; Lampen, A.; Hessel, S. Dose-dependent induction of signaling pathways by the flavonoid quercetin in human primary hepatocytes: A transcriptomic study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1117–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shimizu, M.; Li, J.; Inoue, J.; Sato, R. Quercetin represses apolipoprotein B expression by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of C/EBPβ. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Buzzi, N.; Bilbao, P.S.; Boland, R.; de Boland, A.R. Extracellular ATP activates MAP kinase cascades through a P2Y purinergic receptor in the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009, 1790, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Buzzi, N.; Boland, R.; de Boland, A.R. Signal transduction pathways associated with ATP-induced proliferation of colon adenocarcinoma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1800, 946–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Avizienyte, E.; Brunton, V.G.; Fincham, V.J.; Frame, M.C. The SRC-induced mesenchymal state in late-stage colon cancer cells. Cells Tissues Organs 2005, 179, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, X.L.; Shen, M.N.; Hu, B.; Wang, B.L.; Yang, W.J.; Lv, L.H.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, A.L.; Sun, Y.F.; et al. CD73 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis via activating PI3K/AKT signaling by inducing Rap1-mediated membrane localization of P110β and predicts poor prognosis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rychahou, P.G.; Jackson, L.N.; Silva, S.R.; Rajaraman, S.; Evers, B.M. Targeted molecular therapy of the PI3K pathway: Therapeutic significance of PI3K subunit targeting in colorectal carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2006, 243, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gulhati, P.; Bowen, K.A.; Liu, J.; Stevens, P.D.; Rychahou, P.G.; Chen, M.; Lee, E.Y.; Weiss, H.L.; O’Connor, K.L.; Gao, T.; et al. mTORC1 and mTORC2 regulate EMT, motility, and metastasis of colorectal cancer via RhoA and Rac1 signaling pathways. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 3246–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Han, Y.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Fucoidan inhibits the migration and proliferation of HT-29 human colon cancer cells via the phosphoinositide-3 kinase/Akt/mechanistic target of rapamycin pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 3446–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wu, Y.Q.; Ju, C.L.; Wang, B.J.; Wang, R.G. PABPC1L depletion inhibits proliferation and migration via blockage of AKT pathway in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 3439–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.X.; Wang, S.N.; Chen, J.; Hu, J.G.; Lü, H.Z. A transcriptomic study of probenecid on injured spinal cords in mice. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lillo, M.A.; Gaete, P.S.; Puebla, M.; Burboa, P.C.; Poblete, I.; Figueroa, X.F. Novel Pannexin-1-Coupled Signaling Cascade Involved in the Control of Endothelial Cell Function and NO-Dependent Relaxation. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 2678134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of (a) Quercetin and (b) Probenecid on Caco2 and HT29 cell viability. Viability of treated cells was expressed as a percentage of the control group treated with vehicle alone (DMSO 0.5%) and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett correction for multiple comparisons. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Effects of (a) Quercetin and (b) Probenecid on Caco2 and HT29 cell viability. Viability of treated cells was expressed as a percentage of the control group treated with vehicle alone (DMSO 0.5%) and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett correction for multiple comparisons. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g001
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Relative mRNA expression levels of ABCC6 and NT5E gene in Caco2 and HT29 cells. Results are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. *** p < 0.001. (b) Representative Western blot of the effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on protein expression (D, DMSO 0.25%; Q, Quercetin 165 μM; p, Probenecid 250 μM). mRNA and protein expression levels of NT5E and ABCC6 in Caco2 (c,d) and HT29 (e,f) cells. Result are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Cells treated with vehicle only (DMSO 0.25%) were used as a control, and β-actin was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. (a) Relative mRNA expression levels of ABCC6 and NT5E gene in Caco2 and HT29 cells. Results are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. *** p < 0.001. (b) Representative Western blot of the effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on protein expression (D, DMSO 0.25%; Q, Quercetin 165 μM; p, Probenecid 250 μM). mRNA and protein expression levels of NT5E and ABCC6 in Caco2 (c,d) and HT29 (e,f) cells. Result are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean ± sem of at least three independent experiments. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Cells treated with vehicle only (DMSO 0.25%) were used as a control, and β-actin was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g002
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on Caco2 and HT29 cell migration rate. Caco2 (a,b) and HT29 (c,d) cells were treated with a test molecule for 12 h. Then, a scratch was made in the cell monolayer, and pictures were taken after 24 h, while the cells were still kept in contact with Quercetin (Q) or Probenecid (P). DMSO-treated cells (D) were used as a control. ATP 500 μM was added to both Quercetin- and Probenecid-treated cells. Representative pictures of the scratches are shown in (e,f) for Caco2 and HT29 cells, respectively. Scratch area filled after observation time (difference in the scratch area, highlighted in green, at time 0 and after 24 h) was expressed as the mean and the standard error of at least three replicates. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Effect of Quercetin and Probenecid on Caco2 and HT29 cell migration rate. Caco2 (a,b) and HT29 (c,d) cells were treated with a test molecule for 12 h. Then, a scratch was made in the cell monolayer, and pictures were taken after 24 h, while the cells were still kept in contact with Quercetin (Q) or Probenecid (P). DMSO-treated cells (D) were used as a control. ATP 500 μM was added to both Quercetin- and Probenecid-treated cells. Representative pictures of the scratches are shown in (e,f) for Caco2 and HT29 cells, respectively. Scratch area filled after observation time (difference in the scratch area, highlighted in green, at time 0 and after 24 h) was expressed as the mean and the standard error of at least three replicates. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.01.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g003
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of Quercetin and Probenecid treatment on AKT phosphorylation in (a) Caco2 and (b) HT29 cells. Cells treated with vehicle only (DMSO 0.25%) were used as a control. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Effects of Quercetin and Probenecid treatment on AKT phosphorylation in (a) Caco2 and (b) HT29 cells. Cells treated with vehicle only (DMSO 0.25%) were used as a control. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± sem of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett correction for multiple comparisons. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g004
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g005 550
Figure 5. Purinergic receptor mRNA expression. Relative mRNA expression levels of some relevant purinergic receptors in Caco2 and HT29 cells. The results are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean and standard error of at least three replicates. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Purinergic receptor mRNA expression. Relative mRNA expression levels of some relevant purinergic receptors in Caco2 and HT29 cells. The results are expressed as the 2−ΔCt and are presented as the mean and standard error of at least three replicates. β-actin was used as a reference gene. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g005
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g006 550
Figure 6. Proposed alternative pathways controlling colon cancer cell migration: role of ABCC6. In Caco2 cells (upper panel), ABCC6-secreted ATP activates P2Y receptors, causing an intracellular signaling cascade that controls cell migration. Quercetin and Probenecid reduce the extracellular ATP pool by inhibiting ABCC6 transport activity. In HT29 cells (lower panel), ATP is extruded through unspecified transporters and is converted into adenosine by ectonucleotidase enzymes CD39 and CD73. Activation of adenosine receptors triggers intracellular pathways leading to phosphorylation of AKT, which ultimately controls cell migration. Quercetin and Probenecid act downstream, reducing AKT phosphorylation through an unspecified mechanism. Quercetin also inhibits CD73 activity.
Figure 6. Proposed alternative pathways controlling colon cancer cell migration: role of ABCC6. In Caco2 cells (upper panel), ABCC6-secreted ATP activates P2Y receptors, causing an intracellular signaling cascade that controls cell migration. Quercetin and Probenecid reduce the extracellular ATP pool by inhibiting ABCC6 transport activity. In HT29 cells (lower panel), ATP is extruded through unspecified transporters and is converted into adenosine by ectonucleotidase enzymes CD39 and CD73. Activation of adenosine receptors triggers intracellular pathways leading to phosphorylation of AKT, which ultimately controls cell migration. Quercetin and Probenecid act downstream, reducing AKT phosphorylation through an unspecified mechanism. Quercetin also inhibits CD73 activity.
Pathophysiology 29 00015 g006
Table
Table 1. Primers used in reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay.
Table 1. Primers used in reverse transcription–quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay.
GenePrimer ForwardPrimer Reverse
ACTB5′-CCTGGCACCCAGCACAAT-3′5′-GCCGATCCACACGGAGTACT-3′
ABCC65′-ATCACTGATCCTTCCATCTTG-3′5′-ACCAGCGACACAGAGAAGAGG-3′
NT5E5′-GGGCGGAAGGTTCCTGTAG-3′5′-GAGGAGCCATCCAGATAGACA-3′
P2RY15′-TGTGGTGGTGGCGATCTCC-3′5′-TCGCAGGTACTCGTCTGAGG-3′
P2RY25′-TCAGCATTGTGTTCTTTGGG-3′5′-CTGGGAAATCTCAAGGACTG-3′
P2RY145′-TCAGCATTGTGTTCTTTGGG-3′5′-TGCTGTAACTCACTGACTGG-3′
ADORA2A5′-AACCTGCAGAACGTCACCAA-3′5′- GTCACCAAGCCATTGTACCG -3′
ADORA35′-GTCAGATACAAGAGGGTCAC-3′5′-GTCAGTTTCATGTTCCAGCC-3′
ADORA2B5′-GAGACACAGGACGCGCTGTACG-3′5′-CGGGTCCCCGTGACCAAACT-3′
ACTB, actin beta; ABCC6, ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 6; NT5E, 5′-Nucleotidase Ecto; P2RY1, purinergic receptor P2Y1; P2RY2, purinergic receptor P2Y2; P2RY14, purinergic receptor P2Y14; ADORA2A, adenosine A2a receptor; ADORA3, adenosine A3 receptor, ADORA2B, adenosine A2b receptor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abruzzese, V.; Sukowati, C.H.C.; Tiribelli, C.; Matera, I.; Ostuni, A.; Bisaccia, F. The Expression Level of ABCC6 Transporter in Colon Cancer Cells Correlates with the Activation of Different Intracellular Signaling Pathways. Pathophysiology 2022, 29, 173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology29020015

AMA Style

Abruzzese V, Sukowati CHC, Tiribelli C, Matera I, Ostuni A, Bisaccia F. The Expression Level of ABCC6 Transporter in Colon Cancer Cells Correlates with the Activation of Different Intracellular Signaling Pathways. Pathophysiology. 2022; 29(2):173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology29020015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abruzzese, Vittorio, Caecilia H. C. Sukowati, Claudio Tiribelli, Ilenia Matera, Angela Ostuni, and Faustino Bisaccia. 2022. "The Expression Level of ABCC6 Transporter in Colon Cancer Cells Correlates with the Activation of Different Intracellular Signaling Pathways" Pathophysiology 29, no. 2: 173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology29020015

APA Style

Abruzzese, V., Sukowati, C. H. C., Tiribelli, C., Matera, I., Ostuni, A., & Bisaccia, F. (2022). The Expression Level of ABCC6 Transporter in Colon Cancer Cells Correlates with the Activation of Different Intracellular Signaling Pathways. Pathophysiology, 29(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology29020015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop