You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Article
  • Open Access

11 September 2022

Mechanisms Analysis for Fatal Accident Types Caused by Multiple Processes in the Workplace: Based on Accident Case in South Korea

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Safety Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
2
Department of Big Data, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
3
Department of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
4
Public Institution Assessment Bureau, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Ulsan 44429, Korea
This article belongs to the Special Issue Occupational Safety and Risks in Construction

Abstract

This study aimed to develop the accident mechanism of fatal accidents taking place in multiple processes at the workplace. Multiple processes were defined as the existence of multiple work types and work processes in the same workspace. Recently, various processes are frequently conducted simultaneously in one workplace with the participation of several companies, and more workers are increasingly experiencing industrial accidents while working in multiple processes. To prevent accidents in the multiple processes caused by the sameness of work period and space, the accident process was investigated by analyzing the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents in South Korea, and then the accident mechanism model was developed. By utilizing the developed model, the major safety measures to be taken by the contractor for each of the 8 types of accidents caused by the multiple processes were drawn. The roles and responsibilities of the contractor to be implemented in order to prevent accident occurrence in multiple processes were proposed through the accident mechanism of each type of fatal accident. It is expected that the accidents taking place in the multiple processes can be prevented with the drawn results.

1. Introduction

Recently, due to the enlargement, complication, and high-tech modernization of industries, various processes are frequently conducted simultaneously in one workplace, and several relevant contractors are frequently working simultaneously as a result of the generalization of contracted business. In such a case, interference in working space occurs in the work site due to the simultaneous processes, and as a result, the safety of the work decreases [1,2]. When at least two activities are executed within the same working space, workspace interference can occur. The problem of workspace interference has been considered through the overlapping period of activities; hence, many studies have been focused on solving workspace interference through scheduling activities [3]. In particular, workspace interference causes different challenges in a construction site, such as safety and productivity issues [4,5]. The project manager should consider the movability of the workspace and the criticality of an activity and resolve the problem of the workspace interference by an activity execution plan [6].
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the number of deaths in South Korea (henceforth, Korea) due to working and the number of deaths in the multiple processes, based on the preceding research of the authors [7]. Between 2016 and 2020, the number of deaths in the multiple processes amounted to 426 people, which is 7~14% of the total number of deaths by accidents each year. While the number of deaths by accidents due to working has been decreasing gradually, the number of deaths by accidents in the multiple processes has been increasing rapidly since 2017. In particular, the number of deaths due to the multiple processes increased in 2020 because 38 people died in a fire accident at the construction site of a new logistics center, called the Icheon Fire accident. The cause of the accident was an oil vapor explosion caused by simultaneous urethane foam work and metal cutting work, and it was classified as being due to multiple processes. As accidents are increasing in multiple processes, more efforts are being made to prevent the accidents by strengthening the contractor’s duty for safety and health management.
Figure 1. Percentage of fatalities caused by multiple processes in the workplace among work-related fatalities [7].
Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare implemented measures to prevent accidents occurring from working in the same place by appointing a safety and hygiene manager, and to maintain a general management system by appointing a specific original contractor in the construction and shipbuilding industries [8,9]. In Norway, it is required to appoint a general manager to take responsibility for the management of common safety in the common activities conducted simultaneously in the same place and in the common work site [10]. The Construction Design and Management Regulations in the UK (CDM 2015) assign responsibility to the original designer to plan and manage all of the stages of construction work to adjust matters related to health and safety, and if works are done simultaneously or consecutively, the designer has to consider the plan in the construction stage and the details of health and safety [11]. In Germany, an accident that has occurred by working in the same workplace as various subcontractors should be controlled [12,13].
Similar to other countries such as Japan, Norway, the UK, and Germany, Korea, too, is making efforts to prevent accidents caused by multiple processes with various systems. In Korea, accurate regulations on the prevention of accidents caused by multiple processes have recently been stipulated in the law based on cases in foreign countries. However, it is not based on research such as revealing the mechanism, as suggested in this study. As a first attempt to reduce accidents caused by multiple processes, the Korean government introduced the Safety and Health Coordinator System in 2017 for construction work sites and imposed the obligation to place a safety and health coordinator at the construction work site in order to prevent the industrial accidents that may occur due to the multiple processes conducted in the same place, for the contractor of a construction work where it is necessary to place two or more orders separately. The safety and health coordinator should grasp the details of the multiple processes of separately ordered works and the risk of the multiple processes, and should coordinate the work period and safety and health measures in order to prevent industrial accidents.
However, the Safety and Health Coordinator System in Korea is limited to construction works with the scale of 5 billion won or more, and there is a problem that the responsibility for safety is unclear at the time of occurrence of an accident due to the multiple processes and the multistage subcontract structure in most industries. Therefore, in Korea, the responsibility of the contractor for safety and health was strengthened by expanding the range of the places where the contractor should take safety and health measures, from 22 dangerous places with the possibility of collapse, fall, etc., to the dangerous places controlled and managed by the contractor, by having revisions in the major points of the Occupational Safety and Health Act in 2019. In addition, Article 64 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act was revised on 29 April 2021. As shown in Table 1, No. 7 and No. 8 were added in Article 64 to make it obligatory for the contractor to coordinate the work period, contents, etc., of the work of relevant contractors, in order to minimize the risk of the multiple processes [14].
Table 1. Occupational Safety and Health Act Article 64, Paragraph 18 (in Korea).
Workspace interference by multiple processes increases the potential safety and health risk. If workspace interference is not properly managed, accidents are still occurring. In construction, a more proactive method is being studied and applied to prevent the accident by workspace interference before construction. The building information method (BIM) is used as prevalent method to improve safety and health management in the construction industry [15]. Using BIM, potential safety hazards can be automatically identified and corresponding prevention methods can be applied from the design and planning stage before construction [16,17]. A BIM-based process can solve the workspace interference problem. In addition, it can monitor the workers’ unsafe behavior on site and enhance the current approach of the safety and health plan [18,19].
Though the responsibility of the contractor to take safety and health measures was strengthened and a more proactive active method was developed, accidents by workspace interference during multiple processes are still occurring. The safety measures of the contractor for multiple processes are still prescribed comprehensively and do not reflect the specific characteristics of the accidents. As it is necessary to consider the characteristics of the process of occurrence with the effect of the accident for prevention, it is important to understand the accident mechanism according to the time flow of the accidents [20]. In addition, as pointed out in the authors’ previous research [7], the existing accident mechanism does not correctly explain the accident process by multiple processes. Therefore, this study analyzed the investigation reports of fatal accidents caused by the multiple processes in order to discover a blind spot of safety and health caused by the multiple processes and to understand the characteristics of accidents, and it categorized the accident types to develop the accident mechanism.

2. Definition of Multiple Processes and Drawing of Accident Types

Four years’ worth of accident reports related to fatal accidents in the entire industries of Korea from 2016 to 2020 were examined based on the official accident data of the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the National Statistics Office, along with the report of the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA) on fatal accidents. KOSHA, which was established in 1987, is not only an organization standing at the front line to protect workers’ lives but also the only public organization for industrial accident prevention in Korea by conducting industrial accident prevention projects including R&D on industrial accident prevention techniques and providing technical guidance on occupational safety and health. The collected information on the accidents amounted to 4,641 cases in total. Among them, on the basis of the reports of accidents classified as accidents caused by the multiple processes, the reason for the accident, the process of accident occurrence, the original cause material, the cause of accident occurrence, the measures to prevent accidents, etc., were analyzed in order to draw the types of accidents caused by the multiple processes.

2.1. Definition of Multiple Processes in the Same Workplace

Multiple processes were defined as the existence of multiple work types and work processes in the same workspace through the analysis of process of accident occurrence in the investigation report of the accidents following the preceding research of the authors [7]. For the construction accident analysis model, many models have been developed such as the ConAC (Construction Accident Causation) framework, Bow-Tie, FTA (Fault Tree Analysis), and STAMP (System Theoretic Accident Model and Process) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. However, as pointed out in the authors’ previous research [7], the existing model is not correct for explaining the accident process by multiple process. This research used objective criteria for judgment of accident occurrence by the multiple processes in the same workplace, as presented in Table 2 below [7]. Based on the criteria, the process for determining the accident by multiple processes was drawn. The procedure for determining the accident by multiple processes is shown in Figure 2, and the notation for each decision criterion is shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Decision process criteria and notation of multiple processes in the workplace.
Figure 2. Procedures for determining accident by multiple processes in the workplace [7].
The procedure for determining the accident by multiple processes is divided into A, B, and C stages. A three-stage approach was proposed in the author’s previous study [7]. Since it may be difficult to generalize the path in multiple processes, the common criteria stakeholders, process, time, and space, were established as shown in Table 2 and Figure 2 to determine the accident by the multiple process. First, the A Stage is the stage of analyzing the relations of stakeholders. In this stage, an accident is classified into an accident between the contractor and the relevant contractor and an accident between the relevant contractors, aside from an independent accident of the contractor not prescribed in Article 64 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The B Stage is the stage of analyzing the work process. The cases were classified into an accident which occurred by the interference of two different processes and an accident which occurred by the different operations within one process. An example of a case of different processes conducted simultaneously is the operation of a machine while going through the maintenance. Lastly, the C Stage is the stage of analyzing the effect of the workspace and working time. The accidents occurring in the same working time and the accidents occurring in the same workspaces were classified, aside from the accidents which occurred during the independent operation of workers. Most accidents by the multiple processes occurred when both workspace and working time interfered; however, in other cases such as fire, explosion, and suffocation, some accidents occurred by the influence of residual toxic gas, etc., on the successive operation after the preceding operation conducted in the same workspace, even if the working time did not overlap.

2.2. Types of Accidents Caused by Multiple Processes

The accidents caused by the multiple processes were first classified into the construction industry, manufacturing industry, and other industries, and then classified into the 8 accident types that may be caused by the multiple processes, after analyzing the investigation report of fatal accidents. The classified accident types are ‘caught in equipment or machinery’, ‘collision’, ‘struck by the object (falling or flying)’, ‘fall’, ‘fire or explosion’, ‘crushed by machinery or equipment’, ‘collapse’, and ‘etc. (suffocation, poisoning, etc.)’, and the risks and characteristics of each accident type are shown in Table 3 below. The classification of the accident type is basically followed the general accident classification in Korea, and it is modified in detail by analyzing accident cases. The fatalities according to the considered accident type is tabulated in Table 4.
Table 3. Risks and characteristics of multiple processes in the workplace by accident types [7].
Table 4. Fatalities based on the accident type caused by multiple processes in the workplace (person).

3. Analysis of the Process of Accident Occurrence by Multiple Processes

Among the fatal accidents classified as caused by the multiple processes in the analysis of investigation reports on serious industrial accidents, the process of accident occurrence of 61 cases with relatively detailed descriptions of the cause of accident were analyzed regarding the workspace and working time, according to the accident types drawn in Section 2.2.

3.1. Cases of Risk in Fire and Explosion

The results of analysis of the process of accident occurrence by the multiple processes in the cases of fire and explosion through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents are in Table 5 below. In the analyzed cases, there are two types of occurrence of fire and explosion. The first type is a fire breaking out when welding in a space with inflammable gas or insulation material when different works are conducted in the same workspace. As welding and painting work, etc., are conducted simultaneously, a fire breaks out by the welding spark shooting up to inflammable gas or insulation material, which is vulnerable to fire. The second type is a fire or explosion breaking out in the successive work due to the preceding work when both are conducted consecutively in the same place. For example, when inflammable gas is accumulated from the preceding work, the workers in the successive work are not informed of the information and proceed with welding, and a fire breaks out as a result. In this case, the contractor must coordinate in advance to prevent the cause of fire or explosion caused by being conducted simultaneously with another work. If it is impossible to coordinate, it is necessary to check the safety measures of fire detector, etc., and to check and notify the risk of fire and explosion in the workspace of the successive work.
Table 5. Examples of fire and explosion accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.2. Cases of Being Caught in Equipment or Machinery

It was analyzed that most of the fatal accidents that are caused by being caught in machinery, equipment, etc., occur when two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same place (Table 6). The accidents occurred when the machine operated abruptly or another worker operated the machine while the maintenance work was being done, without turning off the power of the machine, or when another worker operated the machine due to miscommunication. Thus, the contractor must check a protection device when using the machines and equipment and check the safety measures of the procedure in operating the machines and equipment in order to prevent accidents that can be caused by the abrupt operation of the machines and equipment during work. The results of analysis of the risk of multiple processes in being caught by the machinery, equipment, etc., through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents are in Table 6 below.
Table 6. Cases for being caught in equipment or machinery by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.3. Cases of Collision with Vehicles for Unloading and Transporting, Construction Machines, etc.

The accidents classified as collision with vehicles for unloading and transporting, construction machines, etc., by the multiple processes occur when two or more works are conducted in the same space and at the same time, and it was analyzed that most of the accidents occurred when the construction machine collided with another worker during the transport, as the operator of the machine was not aware of the nearby worker. The contractor must put the priority on adjusting the working time, and if it is impossible to coordinate the working time, the contractor must control the entrance of workers into the working area around the construction machine and allocate a signal man (Table 7).
Table 7. Cases of collision accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.4. Cases of Risk in Fall Accidents

The cases of fall accidents by the multiple processes are divided into the accidents occurring in the same space and time and the accidents in a different time in the same space due to the different working times. For example, in an accident where a worker fell and died while working on a workbench installed by another subcontractor, the result of the preceding work affected the successive work. Additionally, in a case in which the chain of a tower crane was fractured and a worker in another workspace was struck and fell to his death, this showed that an accident which occurred in one work may affect a worker doing another work in the same place and result in his death by falling. The contractor needs to separate the workspace by considering the scope of impact of the different works (Table 8).
Table 8. Cases of fall accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.5. Cases of Being Struck by the Object Falling

Mostly, struck accidents by a falling or flying object by multiple processes occur by the work areas located above and below, but some fatal accidents occur by being struck by an object flying from the adjacent upper space. Thus, the contractor needs to take measures to prevent the falling object from the adjacent upper workspace. The results of analysis of the risk of multiple processes in the cases of workers being struck by a falling or flying object through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents are shown in Table 9 below.
Table 9. Cases of struck accidents by the object by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.6. Cases of Risk in Being Crushed by Machinery, Equipment, or Payload

Crushing accidents by machinery, equipment, or payload occur when two or more works are conducted in the same workspace and working time. In order to prevent accidents by the multiple processes, the contractor needs to implement the safety measures preventing workers being crushed by machinery, equipment, or payload and adjust the working time or workspace. The results of analysis of the risk of multiple processes in the cases of workers being crushed by the overturning of machinery, equipment, or payload through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents are shown in Table 10 below.
Table 10. Cases of crushed accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.7. Cases of Risk in Collapse of Payload such as Soil and Sand, Structure, etc.

The accidents of collapse of the payload such as soil and sand, etc., by the multiple processes occur when two or more works are conducted simultaneously or when the preceding work affects the successive work. For example, an accident occurred due to the collapse of the payload during maintenance work when not being aware of the payload in the inside, due to the miscommunication between the contractor and the subcontractor. In addition, a worker working at the lower area was buried due to the collapse of piled soil and sand during the successive work. The results of analysis of the risk of the multiple processes in the cases of collapse of the payload such as soil and sand, structure, etc., through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents are shown in Table 11 below.
Table 11. Cases of collapse accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

3.8. Other Risks (Suffocation, Poisoning by Toxic Gas, etc.)

It was shown in the accident investigation report that the risk of suffocation and poisoning by toxic gas occurred in various types of multiple processes (Table 12). This can be classified into the accidents occurring in the same working time and workspace; the accidents of being exposed to toxic gas by the multiple processes at the same time in separated work spaces; and finally, the cases in which the toxic gas accumulated in the preceding work affects the successive work. It is necessary for the contractor to grasp the hazardous works that can affect the workspace before working and allow the successive work to be conducted only after measuring the concentration of toxic gas in the workspace. In addition, it is necessary to take safety measures such as checking and blocking the path of toxic gas connected to another workspace and adjusting the working time.
Table 12. Cases of asphyxia or intoxication accidents by multiple processes in the workplace.

4. Development of Occurring Mechanism of Each Type of Fatal Accident by Multiple Processes

It is decided that fatal accidents occurring by multiple processes are caused by the chain reaction of various factors of accidents, as drawn in the analysis of risk in accident types. As mentioned earlier, the definition of multiple processes was drawn by conducting various work types and processes in the workspace. Therefore, in order to prevent accidents by multiple processes, it is important to grasp the safety measures that the contractor must implement for each accident type. This study examined first whether several works are conducted in the same workspace and working time and then developed the model of the accident occurring mechanism to judge the occurrence of accidents resulting from the safety measures by the contractor for each accident type (AMMP model).
The model of the accident occurring mechanism was developed on the basis of Event Tree Analysis (ETA), which is an inductive system analysis technique that grasps the process of accident occurrence as a chain process of the accident factors and expresses the chain progress from the triggering event of the accident to the actual occurrence of the accident in the shape of a branch. After analyzing the preceding research on the accident occurring mechanism, the basic event was grasped first by analyzing the root cause of the accident before using ETA technique, then the influence of the root cause on the accident was grasped and applied to the mechanism [29,30,31]. As the most basic condition of multiple processes presented in this study was the overlapping of the workspace and working time, the basic event was drawn on the basis of the flow of accident occurrence according to the overlapping of workspace and working time and the safety measures by the contractor analyzed in Chapter 3, through the investigation reports on serious industrial accidents.
The overall occurring mechanism of the accidents caused by the multiple processes was drawn by the following procedures on the basis of the basic definition of multiple processes.
(1)
Checking the overlapping workspace of the multiple processes
(2)
Checking the overlapping working time according to the overlapping workspace
(3)
Grasping the accident types according to the overlapping workspace and working time
The result of the analysis was “No Accident,” as no accidents occurred unless the works were conducted in the same place and at the same time, as part of the concept of multiple processes. The conditions for occurrence of each accident type are shown in Figure 3 below.
Figure 3. Accident occurrence mechanism by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model).

4.1. Occurring Mechanism of Fire and Explosion

It was analyzed that the fire and explosion caused by the multiple processes occur when several works are conducted at the same time in the same workspace and when works are conducted successively in the same workspace. The accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is presented in Figure 4 below. From the accident occurring mechanism, in order to prevent fire and explosion accidents, the contractor must adjust the working time or check the fire watchman and the safety measures, if two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, and must remove the inflammable gas generated in the preceding work for the successive works if not conducted simultaneously. If the contractor does not perform the presented roles, fire and explosion may be caused by the multiple processes.
Figure 4. Mechanism of fire and explosion caused by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model—fire and explosion).

4.2. Occurring Mechanism of Being Caught in Machinery, Equipment, etc.

The accidents of being caught in machinery, equipment, etc., caused by the multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is in Figure 5 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time or operate the machine after notifying other workers of the information of completion in the work and must check the safety measures in order to prevent accidents caused by the multiple processes. If the contractor does not perform the presented roles, the accidents of being caught in machinery, equipment, etc., may be caused by the multiple processes.
Figure 5. Mechanism of being caught in equipment or machinery by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model—caught).

4.3. Occurring Mechanism of Collision with Construction Machines, etc.

It was analyzed that the accidents caused by collision with construction machines, etc., in multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is shown in Figure 6 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must adjust the workspace. If it is impossible to adjust the workspace and the working time, the contractor must assign a watchman for the work, after checking the safety measures. If the contractor does not take such measures, the accidents of a collision with machines, etc., may be caused by the multiple processes.
Figure 6. Mechanism of collision by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model for collision).

4.4. Occurring Mechanism of Fall Accidents

It was analyzed that fall accidents caused by multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace and when works are conducted successively in the same place, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is shown in Figure 7 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must adjust the workspace. If the works are not conducted at the same time, the contractor must check what the preceding work is and then check the machinery and equipment in order to prevent fall accidents due to the insufficient safety inspection of machines and equipment. If the contractor does not take such measures, fall accidents may be caused by the multiple processes.
Figure 7. Mechanism of fall accident by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model for fall).

4.5. Occurring Mechanism of Being Struck by an Object

It was judged that the accidents of being struck by an object caused by multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace and when works are conducted in the upper and lower areas at the same time, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is shown in Figure 8 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must adjust the workspace. When works are conducted in the upper and lower areas at the same time, the accidents may occur due to the falling of an object from the upper workspace, and thus, it is necessary to take the safety measures.
Figure 8. Mechanism of being struck by an object by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model for struck).

4.6. Occurring Mechanism of Being Crushed by Machinery, Equipment, Payload, etc.

Accidents of being crushed by machinery, equipment, and payload occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is in Figure 9 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must adjust the workspace. If it is impossible to adjust the workspace and the working time, the contractor must check the machinery and equipment and conduct work only after checking the safety measures. If the contractor does not take such measures, the accidents of workers being crushed may be caused by multiple processes.
Figure 9. Mechanism of being crushed by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model for crushed).

4.7. Occurring Mechanism of Collapse of Soil and Sand and Payload

Accidents of collapse of soil and sand and payload by multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace and when works are conducted successively in the same workspace (Figure 10). If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must control the dangerous area, take the safety measures, and assign a watchman. In the case of successive works in the same workspace without overlapping working time, the successive work must be conducted only after receiving the information of the preceding work.
Figure 10. Mechanism of collapse by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model—collapse).

4.8. Occurring Mechanism of Suffocation and Poisoning by Toxic Gas

It was analyzed that the accidents of suffocation and poisoning by toxic gas by multiple processes occur when several works are conducted simultaneously in the same workspace and when works are conducted successively in the same workspace, as well as when works are conducted at the same time in different workspaces, and the accident occurring mechanism according to the role of the contractor is shown in Figure 11 below. If two or more works are conducted simultaneously in the same space, the contractor must adjust the working time, and if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must control the dangerous area, take the safety measures, and assign a watchman. In the case of successive works in the same workspace without overlapping working time, the successive work must be conducted after measuring the concentration of toxic gas inside the workspace after the completion of preceding work. Additionally, if the work that discharges toxic gas in another workspace is conducted simultaneously, it is necessary to check and control the toxic gas intake passage of the other workspace.
Figure 11. Mechanism of asphyxia or intoxication by multiple processes in the workplace (AMMP model for intoxication).

5. Conclusions

This study analyzed the risk of each accident type and developed the accident occurring mechanism for industrial accidents by the multiple processes that have been increasing recently. By analyzing the fatal accident reports on the basis of the definition of multiple processes and the accident types drawn in the preceding research, the characteristics of industrial accidents by multiple processes was investigated.
(1)
According to the developed accident occurring mechanism, the accidents of ‘being caught in equipment or machinery’, ‘collision with vehicles for unloading and transporting and construction machines’, and ‘falling and being crushed by machinery or equipment’ occur in the same workspace and working time, while ‘fire and explosion’, ‘fall accidents’, and ‘collapse of soil and sand and payload’ occur in the same workspace regardless of the working time. In addition, it was found that ‘being struck by an object’ occurs in the condition of works being conducted at the same time rather than being conducted in the same space, and ‘suffocation and poisoning’ occur in the condition of works either being in the same workspace or being conducted at the same time.
(2)
It was found that the role of the contractor is important for the reduction of risk of industrial accidents caused by multiple processes. The common role of the contractor in every accident type is to adjust the working time or separate the workspace, and to check the safety measures before proceeding with the work. If the works are conducted successively in the same space, it is necessary to give the information of the preceding work and notify the completion of the preceding work to the successive work, and to clean the environment of the workplace.
(3)
The major safety measures to be taken by the contractor for each of the 8 types of accidents caused by multiple processes were drawn as follows. If there is a risk of ‘fire and explosion’, the contractor must check if inflammable gas was generated in the preceding work conducted in the same place, and if there is inflammable gas, the contractor has to make sure that it has been removed. If the works are conducted at the same time, the working time must be adjusted. If there is a risk of ‘being caught in machinery, equipment, etc.’, the working time must be adjusted. If it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must instruct the facility operator to share the information on the starting and end times of the works to the other workers, take the safety measures, and assign a watchman. If there is a risk of ‘collision with construction machine’ and ‘being crushed by machinery or equipment’, the contractor must adjust the working time and workspace and must check the safety of machinery and equipment. In the case of ‘fall accidents’ and ‘collapse of soil and sand and payload’, the contractor must check the preceding work and then inform the workers of the successive work of the safety information generated in the preceding work. In the case of ‘being struck by a flying or falling object’, the contractor must approve working only after checking the installation of safety devices such as a safety net against falling objects, as damage may be caused by an object falling or flying from an adjacent space rather than from the same space. Lastly, in the case of ‘suffocation and poisoning by toxic gas’, if it is impossible to adjust the working time, the contractor must check the concentration of toxic gas in the workspace after the completion of the preceding work and must take the safety measures in the toxic gas intake passage, in order to prevent the intake of toxic gas due to the adjacent work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-H.W. and H.-J.J.; methodology, W.K.; validation, S.K. and S.-Y.K.; formal analysis, J.M.H. and J.-H.W.; investigation, J.-H.W. and J.M.H.; data curation, H.-J.J. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.H.; writing—review and editing, J.-H.W. and S.-Y.K.; visualization, H.-J.J.; supervision, J.M.H.; project administration, J.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute of Korea (2021-OSHRI-520).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moon, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, C.; Kang, L. Development of a schedule-workspace interference management system simultaneously considering the overlap level of parallel schedules and workspaces. Autom. Constr. 2013, 39, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gwak, H.-S.; Shin, W.-S.; Park, Y.-J. Space-constrained scheduling optimization method for minimizing the effects of stacking of Trades. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tao, S.; Wu, C.; Hu, S.; Xu, F. Construction project scheduling under workspace interference. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2020, 35, 923–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Charles, I.; Nasiri, F.; Hammad, A. Construction workspace management: Critical review and roadmap. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2022, 22, 1960–1973. [Google Scholar]
  5. Staub-French, S.; Khanzode, A. 3D and 4D modeling for design and construction coordination: Issues and lessons learned. J. Inf. Technol. Const. (ITcon) 2007, 12, 381–407. [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, B.; Lee, H.-S.; Park, M.; Cho, Y.K.; Kim, H. Framework for work-space planning using four-dimensional BIM in construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014, 140, 4014041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, S.-Y.; Min, S.; Kim, W.-S.; Won, J.-H.; Kang, Y.-J.; Kim, S. Types and Characteristics of Fatal Accidents Caused by Multiple Processes in the Workplace: Based on Actual Cases in South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, J.; Kang, K.-S. Improving domestic institutional research through the International Safety Management Practices - Focusing on safety and health management in Japan. J. Korea Saf. Manag. Sci. 2015, 17, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  9. Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Database Service such as Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Laws. 2021. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/hourei/ (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  10. Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion. Arbeidsmiljøloven. 2015. Available online: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/arbeidsliv/arbeidsmiljo-og-sikkerhet/innsikt/arbeidsmiljoloven/id447107/ (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  11. United Kingdom Department of Work and Pensions. The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, CDMR. 2015. Available online: https://www.hse.gov.uk/construction/cdm/2015/index.htm (accessed on 4 September 2021).
  12. Germany Federal Ministry of Justice. Act on the Implementation of Measures of Occupational Safety and Health to Encourage Improvements in the Safety and Health Protection of Workers at Work (Arbeitsschutzgesetz, ArbSchG). 2021. Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/arbschg/ (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  13. Germany Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung. Rules, Regulations and Informations: DGUV Regulation 2. 2021. Available online: https://www.dguv.de/en/prevention/rules_regulations/index.jsp (accessed on 3 September 2021).
  14. Korea Ministry of Employment and Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Act, Article 68 Safety and Health Coordinators. 2020. Available online: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=219125&chrClsCd=010203&urlMode=engLsInfoR&viewCls=engLsInfoR#0000 (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  15. Ganah, A.A.; John, G.A. BIM and project planning integration for on-site safety induction. J. Eng. Design Technol. 2017, 15, 341–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martínez-Aires, M.D.; López-Alonso, M.; Martínez-Rojas, M. Building information modeling and safety management: A systematic review. Saf. Sci. 2018, 101, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pham, K.-T.; Vu, D.-N.; Hong, P.L.H.; Park, C. 4D-BIM-Based Workspace Planning for Temporary Safety Facilities in Construction SMEs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fargnoli, M.; Lombardi, M. Building information modelling (BIM) to enhance occupational safety in construction activities: Research trends emerging from one decade of studies. Build 2020, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ganah, A.; John, G.A. Integrating building information modeling and health and safety for onsite construction. Saf. Health Work 2015, 6, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. He, Y.; Cui, J.; Liu, F.; Zhu, C. Risk-based quality accident ranking approach using failure mechanism and axiomatic domain mapping. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2018, 31, 847–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Michael, B.; Arthur, S. Application of the Loughborough Construction Accident Causation model: A framework for organizational learning. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2013, 31, 580–595. [Google Scholar]
  22. Winge, S.; Alberchtsen, E.; Mostue, B.A. Causal factors and connections in construction accidents. Saf. Sci. 2019, 112, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bellamy, L.J.; Ale, B.J.M.; Geyer, T.A.W.; Goossens, L.H.J.; Hale, A.R.; Oh, J.; Mud, M.; Bloemhof, A.; Papazoglou, I.A.; Whiston, J.Y. Storybuilder—A tool for the analysis of accident reports. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2007, 92, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ale, B.J.M.; Bellamy, L.J.; Baksteen, H.; Damen, M.; Goossens, L.H.J.; Hale, A.R.; Mud, M.; Oh, J.; Papazoglou, I.A.; Whiston, J.Y. Accidents in the construction industry in the Netherlands: An analysis of accident reports using Storybuilder. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, Q.; Xu, K. Statistical Analysis and Prediction of Fatal Accidents in the Metallurgical Industry in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, J.; Bian, H.; Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Bai, Y. Bayesian Network-Based Risk Assessment of Single-Phase Grounding Accidents of Power Transmission Lines. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Y.-J.; Tao, J.; Yang, F.-Q.; Chen, C. Construction Safety during Pandemics: Learning from the Xinjia Express Hotel Collapse during COVID-19 in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Chen, S. Cause Mechanism of Metro Collapse Accident Based on Risk Coupling. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, Q.; Meng, X.; Hassall, M.; Li, X. Accident-causing mechanism in coal mines based on hazards and polarized management. Saf. Sci. 2016, 85, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carrillo-Castrillo, J.; Trillo-Cabello, A.; Rubio-Romero, J. Construction accidents: Identification of the main associations between causes, mechanisms and stages of the construction process. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2016, 23, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zwęgliński, T. Conventional Event Tree Analysis on Emergency Release of Liquefied Natural Gas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.